Politics and Policies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Politics and Policies Politics and Policies Rowland-Hite Health Planning Seminar May 6, 2011 2012 Presidential • Obama polls improving – 50% threshold – Tax deal in December – Move to the center – Unhappy base, but no challenger • Republicans – No clear front runner (historic) – Late starting – Significant divisions Political leverage…Senate • What‟s at stake? – 33 seats 23 Democrats 10 Republicans • Democratic vulnerabilities – States where John McCain won in 2008 Joe Manchin (D-WV)…+13 Claire McCaskill (D-MO)…+0.1 Ben Nelson (D-NE)…+14.9 John Tester (D-MT)…+2.3 – States where GOP flipped Senate seats this year Sherrod Brown (D-OH)…Rob Portman (R) Bob Casey (D-PA)…Pat Toomey (R) [Kent Conrad (D-ND)]…Jon Hoeven (R) Herb Kohl (D-WI)…Ron Johnson (R) Political leverage…House 31 new GOP (of 62) representatives who represent districts won by President Obama • FLORIDA • NEW HAMPSHIRE • TEXAS – Daniel Webster – Charlie Bass – Francisco Canseco – Allen West – Frank Guinta – Blake Farenthold • ILLINOIS • NEW JERSEY • VIRGINIA – Robert Dold – Jon Runyan – Scott Rigell – Adam Kinzinger • NEW YORK • WASHINGTON – Randy Hultgren – Ann Marie Buerkle – Jamie Herrera – Bobby Schilling – Chris Gibson • WISCONSIN – Joe Walsh – Richard Hanna – Sean Duffy • KANSAS – Nan Hayworth – Reid Ribble – Kevin Yoder • NORTH CAROLINA • MICHIGAN – Renee Elmers – Dan Benishek • OHIO – Tim Walberg – Steve Chabot • MINNESOTA – Steve Stivers – Chip Cravaack • PENNSYLVANIA • NEVADA – Lou Barletta – Joe Heck – Mike Fitzpatrick – Pat Meehan Multiple opportunities for reducing spending Legislative Platforms • Continuing resolution(s) on appropriations • Debt limit extension(s) • Congressional Budget Resolutions Congressional Budget Resolution • Not a law…does NOT require Presidential signature • Congressional work-plan… guides committees with Rep. Ryan Sen. Conrad jurisdiction over spending and revenues – Does not come up with specific legislation (policy) • Congress sometimes does NOT agree on a budget resolution – This year likely to be very difficult to resolve House and Senate versions • Significance: – Vehicle for using reconciliation process Senate rules (50 votes) – Key marker for framing long-term issues Medicare and Medicaid = 22.6 percent Debt limit extension(s) Updated Version Commitment to American Prosperity Act S. 245 COSPONSORS Lamar Alexander (R-TN) Richard Burr (R-NC) Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) Mike Crapo (R-ID) Jim Inhofe (R-OK) Johnny Isakson (R-GA) Mark Kirk (R-IL) Jon Kyl (R-AZ) Joe Lieberman (D-CT) Joe Manchin (D-WV) Bob Corker Claire McCaskill John McCain (R-AZ) (R-TN) (D-MO) Corker-McCaskill • Limits total federal spending to no more than 20.6 percent of GDP – Phase-in to that level 2023 • Automatic, across-the-board cuts (sequester) to close gap if Congress does not act to reach targets − Revenue increases not included − Impact of sequester over first nine years: Social Security (-$1.3 trillion) Medicare (-$856 billion) Medicaid (-$547 billion) Key issues Caps and Enforcement Mechanisms • What is the goal? – Balanced budget – Percent of deficit/debt as proportion of GDP – Percent of government spending as proportion of GDP • How will sequestration work? – Defense – Social Security – Medicare – Medicaid – Revenues Another option… Gang of Six • Democrats – Kent Conrad (ND)* – Dick Durbin (IL)* – Mark Warner (VA) • Republicans – Mike Crapo (ID)* – Tom Coburn (OK)* – Saxby Chambliss (GA) “I can‟t wait for the blood bath in April…when debt limit time comes, they‟re going to look around and say „What the hell do we do now? We‟ve got guys who will not approve the debt limit extension unless we give „em a piece of meat, real meat‟, meaning spending cuts. And boy, the blood bath will be extraordinary…there will be hair and eyeballs all over the floor” Alan Simpson “We‟re going to have to deal with it as adults…whether we like it or not, the federal government has obligations, and we have obligations on our part.” Rep. John Boehner (R-OH) Speaker of the House House Budget Resolution Chairman Ryan’s Proposal • Reduces spending $6 trillion over 10 years • Federal spending as percentage of GDP: – 20.25 in 2022 – 20.75 in 2030 House Budget Resolution “Assumptions” in Chairman’s Proposal • Repeal of ACA (-$1.4 trillion) – Medicaid expansions – Subsidies for individuals to purchase private insurance in exchanges – But keep the provider payment cuts • Extension of Bush (Obama) tax cuts • Medicare premium support • Medical liability reform • Medicare physician payment fix • Eliminates Independent Payment Advisory Board • Enforcement mechanism • Medicaid block grants with reductions and 2 percent increase per year (-$750 billion) President’s Proposal (1.0) Health Care • $62 billion for two year patch on Medicare physician payment reductions – Funded by specific savings from: Medicaid Reducing ability of states to use Medicaid provider taxes in 2015 ($18.3 billion) Rebase/extend Medicaid DSH allotments in 2021 ($4.1 billion) Limit Medicaid DME payment to Medicare levels ($6.4 billion) Pharmaceutical proposals ($12.8 billion) Program “integrity” ($13.9 billion) Program “efficiencies” ($6.4 billion) – Most savings do not go to reducing the deficit ($7.6 billion) President’s Proposal (1.0) Other Highlights • Children‟s GME ($317 million in FY 2012) • No major changes to restructure entitlement programs such as Medicare, Medicaid or Social Security President’s Proposal (2.0) • Builds on 1.0 • Reduces spending by $4 trillion over 12 years…deficits would be no more than 2.5-2.8 percent of GDP − “Failsafe” budget trigger beginning in 2014 if targets not achieved: Entitlement benefits exempt from sequester Revenues increases included • Equalizes Medicaid payments to states • Medicare Independent Payment Advisory Board scope expanded: − Limits Medicare per capita growth to GDP plus 1 percent from 2014-2017 − GDP plus 0.5 percent in 2018 and beyond (-$480 billion over 12) − Fast-track recommendations − Hospitals excluded until 2019 Gang of Sixteen? • House – Republicans Eric Cantor (VA) Majority Leader – Democrats Jim Clyburn (SC) Assistant Minority Leader Chris Van Hollen (MD) Ranking Member, Budget Committee • Senate – Democrats Max Baucus (MT) Finance Committee Chair Daniel Inouye (HI) Appropriations Committee Chair – Republicans Jon Kyl (AZ) Assistant Minority Leader Budget Enforcement Mechanisms ISSUE SIMPSON- CORKER- PRESIDENT HOUSE BOWLES McCASKILL OBAMA BUDGET (RYAN PLAN) TARGETS Budget (excluding Caps on federal Total budget: estimates Caps on federal interest) is in primary spending as a that proposal will reduce spending as a balance by 2015 OR percentage of GDP. deficits as to 2.5 percent percentage of the debt held by public has Phases down to: of GDP in 2015 and on GDP: stabilized • 22.5 in 2013 a declining path toward • 20.25 in 2022 • 21.70 in 2014 2.0 percent by end of • 20.75 in 2030 • 21.20 in 2015 decade. A trigger will • 18.75 in 2040 • 20.6 in 2023 ensure that it does not • 14.75 in 2050 exceed 2.8 percent. Medicare: limits Medicare per-capita growth to GDP plus 1 percent from 2014 - 2017; and GDP plus .05 percent in 2018 and beyond FASTRACK Reconciliation like Congress may take Yes; special procedures Yes MECHANISM process actions to avoid for Medicare using IPAB sequester under regular procedures AUTOMATIC No • Does not include • Includes revenue • Does not include ACROSS-THE revenue increases increases revenue BOARD CUTS • Includes cuts in • Includes increases entitlement entitlement • Includes cuts in (SEQUESTER) programs programs with entitlement limits (protects programs benefits) President Gang of Chairman Obama 2.0 Six Ryan • IPAB with • Repeal ACA but enforcement keep hospital cuts mechanism (Medicare) • Block grant and cut Medicaid • Restrict use of Medicaid provider • Medicare premium taxes support • Budget caps and • Budget caps and enforcement enforcement mechanisms mechanisms Our strategy • Arbitrary targets and triggers are not the answer • Already made a significant contribution (ACA) − Reductions − Performance penalties − Reforms − Other sectors deserve examination − Impact of state level reductions − Regulatory actions (coding offset) Alternatives • Liability reform • “Real” comparative effectiveness • Care at the end of life • Administrative simplification • Medicare cost sharing restructuring • Adjusting Medicare eligibility age • Revenues – Junk food taxes…obesity – Medicare (FICA) rate adjustments – Limiting deductibility of health insurance premiums Medicaid • Phase out of additional FMAP funding American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 • “Flexibility:” pressure from governors – Block grants – Maintenance of effort for eligibility • Elimination of provider taxes “If we could get Medicaid as a block grant with total flexibility to run the program as we see fit, I would be willing to take a cap on growth of 2 percent a year. Many governors feel that way.” Governor Haley Barbour (R-MS) Immediate Past Chair Republican Governors Association Medicaid alternatives • Applying ACA options – Accountable care organizations – Bundled payments – Medical homes – Pay for performance • Coordinated care for dually eligible • Coordinate care for chronic conditions • Increased use of generic drugs • Tax incentives for long-term care • Restructure copayments • Program integrity FY 2012 Medicare Inpatient PPS Proposed Rule Key Issues • Readmissions • Quality: efficiency measures and VBP • Rural floor • Coding offset Proposed Medicare Inpatient Rule: FY 2012 Our Strategy • Timetable – Comment period until June 20 – Final rule expected
Recommended publications
  • 114TH CONGRESS / First Session Available at Frcaction.Org/Scorecard
    FRC ACTION VOTE SCORECARD 114TH CONGRESS / First Session Available at FRCAction.org/scorecard U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate Dear Voter and Friend of the Family, FRC Action presents our Vote Scorecard for the First Session of the 114th Congress. This online Scorecard contains a compilation of significant votes on federal legislation affecting faith, family, and freedom that FRC Action either supported or opposed. These recorded votes span the 2015 calendar year and include the greatest number of pro-life votes in history, after the U.S. House increased its Republican membership and the U.S. Senate was returned to Republican control. The year began with a bipartisan effort in the House to prohibit federal funds from being used to pay for abortion coverage under Obamacare. Congress successfully fought to restrict FDA approval of some forms of embryo-destructive research. The House, once again, passed legislation that would prevent late abortions on 5 month old pain-capable unborn children, and although the Senate was unable to pass the bill due to the 60 vote threshold, for the first time, a majority of Senators voted in favor of the bill. The public release of videos revealing Planned Parenthood’s organ harvesting practices renewed efforts to defund this scandal-ridden organization and redirect funding towards community health centers. In an unprecedented victory, the House and Senate passed a budget reconciliation bill, the Restoring Ameri- cans’ Healthcare Freedom Reconciliation Act, which would have eliminated a significant portion of Planned Parenthood’s funding—roughly 80%— and repealed key provisions of Obamacare.
    [Show full text]
  • Limited Appearance Statement Of
    July 26, 2013 By US Mail Commissioner Allison M. Macfarlane U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop 0-16G4 Washington, DC 20555 Dear Allison M. Macfarlane, Enclosed is a copy of "Generating Influence," Common Cause/New York's comprehensive study of Entergy Corporation's political spending and public relations campaign to secure new operating licenses for the Indian Point nuclear power plant in Buchanan, New York. As you are well aware, Entergy is currently in the late stages of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission license renewal process that began in 2007. While Common Cause takes no position on the relicensing of Indian Point, we strongly believe that the final decision should be based on objective analysis of the costs and benefits and not unduly shaped by the well-funded lobbying, campaign contributions, and publicity campaigns of Entergy Corporation. As such, it is crucial that NRC officials are fully aware of the extraordinary extent to which the appearance of "public support" for the Indian Point nuclear power plant appears to have been generated by the deceptive strategies of Entergy Corporation. In addition to the "inside game" of lobbying and campaign contributions, Entergy has engaged in an extensive "outside game" of public relations and grassroots "astroturfing" strategies. From making targeted campaign contributions and hiring former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani to appear in an advertising campaign, to cultivating influential"front group" coalitions of business interests, unions, local political leaders, and non-profits (NY AREA and SHARE), Entergy is working the full spectrum of lobbying and publicity strategies in an all-out effort to keep Indian Point open.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Section
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 116 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 166 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, JULY 29, 2020 No. 134 Senate The Senate met at 10 a.m. and was Our two countries, as you know, have the institutions of American life can- called to order by the President pro a centuries-old relationship. That rela- not stay totally shut down until our tempore (Mr. GRASSLEY). tionship will be further strengthened race for a vaccine hits the finish line. f by a comprehensive deal that presents Our Nation needs to smartly and economic opportunities for our farm- safely reopen while keeping up the PRAYER ers, our manufacturers, and our service medical battle. We need to get kids The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- providers to the benefit of both sides of safely back to school and adults safely fered the following prayer: the Atlantic. back to work without losing ground in Eternal God, You have taken care of I will continue to insist that an the healthcare fight. us in the years that have gone. We agreement reached between our two The coronavirus does not care that honor You for Your glory and strength. countries will allow us to reach our full we are divided. The coronavirus will May we place our hope in You and potential as trading partners, particu- not care if Washington Democrats de- never forget that You can also sustain larly when it comes to agricultural cide it suits their partisan goals to let us in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • 167 Representatives on FY 07 Animal Welfare Funding Letter
    167 Representatives on FY 07 Animal Welfare Funding Letter Arizona Hawaii Missouri Pennsylvania Rep. Raul Grijalva (D) Rep. Ed Case (D) Rep. Russ Carnahan (D) Rep. Robert Brady (D) Rep. Ed Pastor (D) Rep. William Lacy Clay (D) Rep. Mike Doyle (D) Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D) Rep. Phil English (R) Illinois Rep. Chaka Fattah (D) Arkansas Rep. Judy Biggert (R) Rep. Vic Snyder (D) Rep. Jerry Costello (D) Nevada Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick (R) Rep. Danny Davis (D) Rep. Shelley Berkley (D) Rep. Jim Gerlach (R) Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D) Rep. Todd Platts (R) California Rep. Lane Evans (D) Rep. Allyson Schwartz (D) Rep. Howard Berman (D) New Hampshire Rep. Curt Weldon (R) Rep. Mary Bono (R) Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D) Rep. Charles Bass (R) Rep. Lois Capps (D) Rep. Dan Lipinski (D) Rep. Bobby Rush (D) Rhode Island Rep. Susan Davis (D) New Jersey Rep. Anna Eshoo (D) Rep. Janice Schakowsky (D) Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D) Rep. John Shimkus (R) Rep. Robert Andrews (D) Rep. James Langevin (D) Rep. Sam Farr (D)* Rep. Jerry Weller (R) Rep. Mike Ferguson (R) Rep. Bob Filner (D) Rep. Rush Holt (D) Rep. Elton Gallegly (R) Rep. Frank LoBiondo (R) South Carolina Rep. Michael Honda (D) Indiana Rep. Frank Pallone, Jr. (D) Rep. James Clyburn (D) Rep. Tom Lantos (D) Rep. Dan Burton (R) Rep. Bill Pascrell, Jr. (D) Rep. John Spratt (D) Rep. Barbara Lee (D) Rep. Julia Carson (D) Rep. Joe Wilson (R) Rep. Donald Payne (D) Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D) Rep. Jim Saxton (R) Rep. Doris Matsui (D) Iowa Rep. Christopher Smith (R) South Dakota Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Bipartisan Legislation to Amend Title VII of Dodd-Frank Act in 113Th Congress House Committee on Agriculture
    Bipartisan Legislation to Amend Title VII of Dodd-Frank Act in 113th Congress House Committee on Agriculture 1. H.R. 677: Inter-Affiliate Swap Clarification Act • Would provide that inter-affiliate transactions, when the parties to the transaction are under common control, will not be regulated as swaps. • Regulating inter-affiliate swaps provides no additional risk-reduction, but it does substantially raise costs for corporations. • Ensures that transactions between affiliates within a single corporate group are not regulated as swaps. • Regulators are considering requiring that inter-affiliate swaps are treated the same as all other swaps—requiring margin, clearing, and price reporting. • Many companies use one affiliate to conduct swaps, and then allocate that risk to other affiliates within their corporate structure. • If these inter-affiliate transactions are subject to the same regulation as other swaps, companies could be subject to double margin, and this centralized trading model may become cost- prohibitive. 113th Congress: Introduced February 13, 2013 . Sponsored by Reps. Steve Stivers (R-OH), Gwen Moore (D-WI), Chris Gibson (R-NY) and Marcia Fudge (D-OH). 112th Congress: H.R. 2779, Sponsored by Reps. Steve Stivers, Marcia Fudge, Chris Gibson and Gwen Moore. Passed Financial Services on November 30, 2011: 53 Yeas, 0 Nays. Passed Agriculture on January 25, 2012 by voice vote. Passed House on March 26, 2012: 357 Yeas, 36 Nays. 2. H.R. 634: Business Risk Mitigation and Price Stabilization Act of 2013 • Would provide an exemption from Dodd-Frank margin requirements for swaps transactions that qualify for the end-user clearing exemption. • Congress never intended for end-users to be subject to expensive margin requirements, which would require companies to take capital away from their businesses and hinder their ability to make job-creating investments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Digital Political Advertising Network
    PLATFORMS AND OUTSIDERS IN PARTY NETWORKS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE DIGITAL POLITICAL ADVERTISING NETWORK Bridget Barrett A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at the Hussman School of Journalism and Media. Chapel Hill 2020 Approved by: Daniel Kreiss Adam Saffer Adam Sheingate © 2020 Bridget Barrett ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Bridget Barrett: Platforms and Outsiders in Party Networks: The Evolution of the Digital Political Advertising Network (Under the direction of Daniel Kreiss) Scholars seldom examine the companies that campaigns hire to run digital advertising. This thesis presents the first network analysis of relationships between federal political committees (n = 2,077) and the companies they hired for electoral digital political advertising services (n = 1,034) across 13 years (2003–2016) and three election cycles (2008, 2012, and 2016). The network expanded from 333 nodes in 2008 to 2,202 nodes in 2016. In 2012 and 2016, Facebook and Google had the highest normalized betweenness centrality (.34 and .27 in 2012 and .55 and .24 in 2016 respectively). Given their positions in the network, Facebook and Google should be considered consequential members of party networks. Of advertising agencies hired in the 2016 electoral cycle, 23% had no declared political specialization and were hired disproportionately by non-incumbents. The thesis argues their motivations may not be as well-aligned with party goals as those of established political professionals. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES .................................................................................................................... V POLITICAL CONSULTING AND PARTY NETWORKS ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 General Primary Write-Ins
    2016 General Primary Election Official Write-In Results Precinct Precinct Name Party Office Candidate Votes Number BELLEFONTE 171ST - 01 DEM BENNINGHOF 1 NORTH REPRESENTATIVE IN GA BELLEFONTE ALT. DELEGATE TO NAT'L 01 REP HOSTERMAN, TROY 1 NORTH CONVENTION BELLEFONTE ALT. DELEGATE TO NAT'L 01 REP JOYCE HAAS 1 NORTH CONVENTION BELLEFONTE 01 DEM AUDITOR GENERAL ANTHONY EDMONDSON 1 NORTH BELLEFONTE 01 REP CONGRESS - 5TH JOHN ADAMS 1 NORTH BELLEFONTE 01 REP CONGRESS - 5TH MICKEY MOUSE 1 NORTH BELLEFONTE DELEGATE TO NATIONAL 01 DEM ASH KHARE 1 NORTH CONVENTION BELLEFONTE DELEGATE TO NATIONAL 01 DEM C. ARNOLD MCCLURE 1 NORTH CONVENTION BELLEFONTE DELEGATE TO NATIONAL 01 DEM JAMES KLEIN 1 NORTH CONVENTION BELLEFONTE DELEGATE TO NATIONAL 01 REP WILL REED 1 NORTH CONVENTION BELLEFONTE 01 DEM PRESIDENT BEN CARSON 1 NORTH BELLEFONTE 01 DEM PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP 1 NORTH BELLEFONTE 01 DEM PRESIDENT TED CRUZ 1 NORTH BELLEFONTE 01 DEM STATE TREASURER RICHARD FORNICOLA 1 NORTH BELLEFONTE 01 REP STATE TREASURER RICH FORICOLA 1 NORTH BELLEFONTE 01 REP US SENATOR STEVEN HAIR 1 NORTH 171ST - 02 BELLEFONTE NE DEM KERRY BENNINGHOFF 2 REPRESENTATIVE IN GA 171ST - 02 BELLEFONTE NE REP GERALD RETIZ 1 REPRESENTATIVE IN GA ALT. DELEGATE TO NAT'L 02 BELLEFONTE NE REP BARRY CASPER 1 CONVENTION ALT. DELEGATE TO NAT'L 02 BELLEFONTE NE REP DREW CURTIN 1 CONVENTION ALT. DELEGATE TO NAT'L 02 BELLEFONTE NE REP GERALD RETIZ 1 CONVENTION ALT. DELEGATE TO NAT'L 02 BELLEFONTE NE REP JAMES KLENE 1 CONVENTION ALT. DELEGATE TO NAT'L 02 BELLEFONTE NE REP JIM WORTHINGTON 1 CONVENTION ALT.
    [Show full text]
  • 115Th Congress Roster.Xlsx
    State-District 114th Congress 115th Congress 114th Congress Alabama R D AL-01 Bradley Byrne (R) Bradley Byrne (R) 248 187 AL-02 Martha Roby (R) Martha Roby (R) AL-03 Mike Rogers (R) Mike Rogers (R) 115th Congress AL-04 Robert Aderholt (R) Robert Aderholt (R) R D AL-05 Mo Brooks (R) Mo Brooks (R) 239 192 AL-06 Gary Palmer (R) Gary Palmer (R) AL-07 Terri Sewell (D) Terri Sewell (D) Alaska At-Large Don Young (R) Don Young (R) Arizona AZ-01 Ann Kirkpatrick (D) Tom O'Halleran (D) AZ-02 Martha McSally (R) Martha McSally (R) AZ-03 Raúl Grijalva (D) Raúl Grijalva (D) AZ-04 Paul Gosar (R) Paul Gosar (R) AZ-05 Matt Salmon (R) Matt Salmon (R) AZ-06 David Schweikert (R) David Schweikert (R) AZ-07 Ruben Gallego (D) Ruben Gallego (D) AZ-08 Trent Franks (R) Trent Franks (R) AZ-09 Kyrsten Sinema (D) Kyrsten Sinema (D) Arkansas AR-01 Rick Crawford (R) Rick Crawford (R) AR-02 French Hill (R) French Hill (R) AR-03 Steve Womack (R) Steve Womack (R) AR-04 Bruce Westerman (R) Bruce Westerman (R) California CA-01 Doug LaMalfa (R) Doug LaMalfa (R) CA-02 Jared Huffman (D) Jared Huffman (D) CA-03 John Garamendi (D) John Garamendi (D) CA-04 Tom McClintock (R) Tom McClintock (R) CA-05 Mike Thompson (D) Mike Thompson (D) CA-06 Doris Matsui (D) Doris Matsui (D) CA-07 Ami Bera (D) Ami Bera (D) (undecided) CA-08 Paul Cook (R) Paul Cook (R) CA-09 Jerry McNerney (D) Jerry McNerney (D) CA-10 Jeff Denham (R) Jeff Denham (R) CA-11 Mark DeSaulnier (D) Mark DeSaulnier (D) CA-12 Nancy Pelosi (D) Nancy Pelosi (D) CA-13 Barbara Lee (D) Barbara Lee (D) CA-14 Jackie Speier (D) Jackie
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Political Contributions
    2011 POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS 2011 Lilly Political Contributions 2 Government actions such as price controls, pharmaceutical manufacturer rebates, the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA), and access to Lilly medicines affect our ability to invest in innovation. Lilly has a comprehensive government relations operation to have a voice in the public policymaking process at both the state and federal levels. Lilly is committed to participating in the political process as a responsible corporate citizen to help inform the U.S. debate over health care and pharmaceutical innovation. As a company that operates in a highly competitive and regulated industry, Lilly must participate in the political process to fulfill its fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders, and its overall responsibilities to its customers and its employees. Corporate Political Contribution Elected officials, no matter what level, have an impact on public policy issues affecting Lilly. We are committed to backing candidates who support public policies that contribute to pharmaceutical innovation and healthy patients. A number of factors are considered when reviewing candidates for support. The following evaluation criteria are used to allocate political contributions: • Has the candidate historically voted or announced positions on issues of importance to Lilly, such as pharmaceutical innovation and health care? • Has the candidate demonstrated leadership on key committees of importance to our business? • Does the candidate demonstrate potential for legislative leadership?
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Redistricting and Congressional Control Following the 2012 Election
    Redistricting and Congressional Control Following the 2012 Election By Sundeep Iyer On Election Day, Republicans maintained control of the House of Representatives. While two Congressional races remain undecided as of November 20, it appears that Democrats may have picked up about eight seats during the 2012 election,1 falling well short of the 25 seats Democrats needed to take back control of the House. Before the election, the Brennan Center estimated that redistricting would allow Republicans to maintain long-term control of 11 more seats in the House than they would have under the previous district lines.2 Now that the election is complete, it is worth re-examining the influence of redistricting on the results of the 2012 election. This brief assesses how the new district lines affected the partisan balance of power in the House. The report is the prologue to more extensive analyses, which will examine other aspects of redistricting, including the fairness of the process and its effect on minority representation, among others. Based on our initial analysis of the 2012 election, several important trends emerge: • Redistricting may have changed which party won the election in at least 25 House districts. Because of redistricting, it is likely that the GOP won about six more seats overall in 2012 than they would have under the old district lines. • Where Republicans controlled redistricting, the GOP likely won 11 more seats than they would have under the old district lines, including five seats previously held by Democrats. Democrats also used redistricting to their advantage, but Republicans redrew the lines for four times as many districts as Democrats.
    [Show full text]
  • TK Transcribers 1518 W Porter Street Philadelphia, PA 19145 609-440-2177 2
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA - - - LOUIS AGRE, : CIVIL NO. 17-4392 et al., : Plaintiff : : : : : v. : : : : : THOMAS W. WOLF, : Philadelphia, Pennsylvania et al., : December 5, 2017 Defendant : 1:03 p.m. - - - TRANSCRIPT AFTERNOON SESSION OF TRIAL DAY 2 BEFORE THE HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, D. BROOKS SMITH, AND PATTY SHWARTZ UNITED STATES JUDGES - - - APPEARANCES: For the Plaintiffs: ALICE W. BALLARD, ESQUIRE Law Office of Alice W. Ballard, P.C. 123 S Broad Street Suite 2135 Philadelphia, PA 19109 THOMAS H. GEOGHEGAN, ESQUIRE MICHAEL P. PERSOON, ESQUIRE SEAN MORALES-DOYLE, ESQUIRE Despres, Schwartz & Geoghegan LTD 77 W Washington St Suite 711 Chicago, IL 60602 TK Transcribers 1518 W Porter Street Philadelphia, PA 19145 609-440-2177 2 1 APPEARANCES: (Continued) 2 BRIAN A. GORDON, ESQUIRE Gordon & Ashworth, P.C. 3 One Belmont Avenue Suite 519 4 Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004 5 For the Defendants: MARK A. ARONCHICK, ESQUIRE 6 MICHELE D. HANGLEY, ESQUIRE Hangley, Aronchick, Segal & 7 Pudlin One Logan Square 8 27th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19103 9 For the Intervenor JASON B. TORCHINSKY, ESQUIRE 10 Defendants: Holtzman, Vogel, Josefiak, Torchinsky, PLLC. 11 45 North Hill Drive Suite 100 12 Warrenton, VA 20186 13 BRIAN S. PASZAMANT, ESQUIRE Blank Rome 14 One Logan Square Philadelphia, PA 19103 15 KATHLEEN A. GALLAGHER, ESQUIRE 16 Cipriani & Werner, P.C. 650 Washington Road 17 Suite 700 Pittsburgh, PA 15228 18 - - - 19 Audio Operator: Janice Lutz 20 Transcribed By: Michael T. Keating 21 - - - 22 Proceedings recorded by electronic sound 23 recording; transcript produced by computer-aided transcription service. 24 - - - 25 Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Representatives 1. Alabama A. Bradly Byrne (Republican) I
    House of Representatives 1. Alabama a. Bradly Byrne (Republican) i. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/byrneforalabama ii. Twitter: https://twitter.com/repbyrne b. Martha Roby (Republican) i. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Representative.Martha.Roby ii. Twitter: https://twitter.com/repmartharoby c. Mike Rogers (Republican) i. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Mike-Rogers/6406874733 ii. Twitter: https://twitter.com/repmikerogersal d. Robert Aderholt (Republican) i. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RobertAderholt ii. Twitter: https://twitter.com/robert_aderholt e. Mo Brooks (Republican) i. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RepMoBrooks ii. Twitter: https://twitter.com/repmobrooks f. Gary Palmer (Republican) i. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PalmerforAlabama ii. Twitter: https://twitter.com/palmer4alabama g. Teri Sewell (Democrat) i. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RepSewell ii. Twitter: https://twitter.com/repterrisewell 2. Alaska a. Don Young (Republican) i. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RepDonYoung ii. Twitter: https://twitter.com/repdonyoung 3. Arizona a. Ann Kirkpatrick (Democrat) i. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RepKirkpatrick ii. Twitter: https://twitter.com/repkirkpatrick b. Martha McSally (Republican) i. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MarthaMcSally ii. Twitter: https://twitter.com/marthamcsally c. Raul Grijalva (Democrat) i. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Rep.Grijalva ii. Twitter: https://twitter.com/repraulgrijalva d. Paul Gosar (Republican) i. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/repgosar ii. Twitter: https://twitter.com/repgosar e. Matt Salmon (Republican) i. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RepMattSalmon ii. Twitter: https://twitter.com/repmattsalmon f. David Schweikert (Republican) i. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/repdavidschweikert ii. Twitter: https://twitter.com/repdavid g. Ruben Gallego (Democrat) i. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/GallegoforArizona ii.
    [Show full text]