The Battle of Pinkie Cleugh 1547

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Battle of Pinkie Cleugh 1547 David Pilling relives Black Saturday, one of Scotland’s worst historic military defeats THE BAttLE OF Pinkie Cleugh 1547 he Battle of Pinkie Cleugh, fought Right: Duke of Somerset on the banks of the River Esk on 10 September 1547, was one of the Tworst military defeats in Scotland’s history and is remembered in Scotland today as Black Saturday. The battle was fought as part of a war known as the ‘Rough Wooing’ whereby the government of England attempted to force the Scots hand over their child-Queen Mary for betrothal to Prince Edward, only son of Henry VIII. The Scots were reluctant to In September 1547 Somerset personally led an army be forced into an alliance with England, into Scotland, supported by a large well-equipped fleet and when diplomacy failed Henry sent an army into Scotland to force the issue. After Henry died in January 1547 the guns, but these were not as mobile or well awareness of the superior English artillery Duke of Somerset, who was appointed manned as Somerset’s. The only cavalry and equipment, Arran tried to avoid a Protector of England until Prince Edward, available to the Scots were 2000 Borderers, pitched battle by sending two challenges now Edward VI, came of age, continued fine soldiers in their way but unreliable to his opponent. One was for Arran and the ‘Rough Wooing’. Somerset shared and only lightly equipped. Somerset to settle the issue by single Henry’s ambition of coercing Scotland As soon as his army was ready Arran combat and the other for 20 champions into an alliance, and also of imposing marched to block Somerset’s advance and to be picked from both sides to decide the Anglican Reformation on the Scottish deployed his men on the west bank of the the matter. Somerset, equally aware that church. Thus in September 1547 Somerset River Esk, where his flanks were protected he held all the advantages, declined both personally led an army into Scotland, by the Firth of Forth on his left and an proposals. Battle was now unavoidable. supported by a large well-equipped fleet. impassable bog to his right. Arran also On the morning of 10 September The English army was partially had some fortifications built and mounted Somerset made the first move, advancing composed of traditional levies armed with them with cannons, some pointing out his army towards Inveresk. Meanwhile longbows and bills (a kind of curved bill- towards the Forth to ward off the English Arran hurried his army across the Esk and hook mounted on a short stave) but also fleet. Arran’s cause was not helped by one marched rapidly in three massive columns had modern elements. These included of his lieutenants, the Earl of Home, who of pikes to meet the English, hoping to German mercenaries armed with an early contrived to lose most of the Scottish close with them before their artillery could form of handgun known as the arqebus, cavalry in a pointlessly chivalrous gesture. deploy. Abandoning his fortified position a formidable artillery train and thousands On 9 September a division of Somerset’s on the banks of the Esk meant that his of armoured cavalry, including a troop army moved to occupy Falside Hill, own guns could not protect his army from of Spanish mounted gunmen. This large three miles east of Arran’s main position. being fired upon by English warships, and and well-equipped army formed a stark Home chose this moment to lead 1500 his left wing was raked with cannon fire. contrast to that of the Scots, which largely horsemen towards the English camp and The columns of pikes began to consisted of the same kind of pikemen challenge an equal number of English disintegrate as shot tore through their and Highland archers that had fought at cavalry to a fight. The English accepted tightly packed ranks and the lightly Bannockburn centuries before. and sent out 1000 men-at-arms and 500 armed Highlanders broke and fled almost Somerset marched along the east coast lancers to engage the Scottish Borderers, immediately. The survivors pushed of Scotland, intending to stay in touch whose light armour and shaggy hill ponies into Arran’s own division in the centre, with his fleet and so avoid running were no match against the tide of heavy impeding but not halting their advance, out of supplies. Lightly armed Scottish horses, sabres, lances and arqebuses. After and the bulk of the Scottish army horseman, most of them from the lawless a short and brutal melee the Borderers continued to plough onwards, much to Border regions, harried his army as it broke and fled west, and were pursued the surprise of the English who were not marched but could do nothing to check and cut down all the way back to the yet ready to meet them. its progress. In the meantime the Regent main Scottish encampment. This bloody Desperate to give his infantry and of Scotland, the Earl of Arran, hastily skirmish decimated the Scottish cavalry artillery time to deploy, Somerset threw scraped together as many men as possible. and rendered them virtually useless as a his cavalry against the Scots. Heavily Other than the pikeman and Highland fighting force. armoured, equipped with lances, archers he managed to assemble some Perhaps because of this setback and his swords and maces and mounted on EAST LOTHIAN LIFE 46 EAST LOTHIAN LIFE 47 English cavalry, Lord Grey, galloped out of the dreadful melee bleeding heavily from a pike wound to his mouth and throat, soon followed by the remnants of his cavalry who abandoned their futile efforts to break through the pikes and retreated up Fawside Brae. With the ground before them strewn with dead and the English cavalry in full flight, the Scots for a moment glimpsed victory. But it was an illusion: having ruthlessly sacrificed his cavalry, Somerset used the time they gave him to organise his artillery, archers and arquebusiers. They were now drawn up in disciplined formation right in front of the Scots, and at Somerset’s order began to fire at massed point-blank range into the dense blocks of pikemen. At the same time the English warships resumed their bombardment and Arran’s hapless army was exposed to a rolling barrage of shot, shell, bullets and arrows tearing into its front, flank and rear. Unable to advance into the storm of missiles and abandoned by the remnants of their cavalry, who spent the battle greedily eyeing the English baggage train but making no move to help, the Scots had no option but to stand and endure the storm. Brave as they were, it was impossible to bear the storm for long and they began to waver, and then broke Above: ‘Mary Queen of Scots (1542-1587) seen here powerful warhorses, the English cavalry into headlong flight. The rout was led in adulthood. As a child she was smuggled out of were formidable but unlikely to break by Arran, who leaped aboard the nearest Scotland and betrothed to the Dauphin of France’ the disciplined wall of Scottish pikes. horse and quit the field as his army died Below: ‘An arquebusier or handgunner loading Nonetheless they galloped full tilt into around him. his weapon: these new type of firearms gave the English a decisive advantage over the less well- the pikemen, who by now were partially This was the signal for the English equipped Scots’ obscured by a pall of gunsmoke from the cavalry, which had reformed on the cannon fire of the English warships. slopes of Fawside Brae, to launch a second Beneath the thundering impact of charge that smashed through the tottering the English charge the Scottish line remnants of the Scottish pikes and put the was seen to buckle and waver, but it whole to flight. Enraged by the casualties refused to break. An Englishman named they had suffered, the horsemen went William Patten, Somerset’s secretary after the fugitives in a pursuit so merciless and an eyewitness of the battle, noted that even Somerset was shocked into the admirable discipline of the Scottish recalling them. pikemen. Somerset had won a resounding victory, ‘They thrust shoulders (he wrote) nigh but in the long run it counted for little. together, the fore rank, well nigh to Despite the slaughter of their army the kneeling, stood low before their fellows Scottish government refused to submit behind holding their pikes in both to English demands for the infant Queen hands…the one end of the pike against Mary to be handed over, and instead their right foot, the other against the smuggled her out of the country to enemy breast high’ France to be betrothed to the Dauphin Against this impenetrable hedge of Francis. Somerset reacted by occupying pikes the English cavalry soon came to the Lowlands and filling Scottish towns grief, many having their horses speared and strongholds with English soldiers, from under them while others, described but this achieved nothing except an as ‘a few lewd soldiers’ by Patten, gave exhausting drain on the English treasury. up the unequal fight and fled. The more The English garrisons were surrounded by determined among them attempted hostile Scots and exercised no authority to batter down the pikes with swords beyond town and castle walls, and in the and maces, but achieved little. At one end Somerset was forced to admit defeat point the bearer of the Royal Standard, and evacuate Scotland. Thus the Battle of Sir Andrew Flammack, was surrounded Pinkie Cleugh is an interesting example and almost pulled from his horse, but of a ‘modern’ army defeating one armed was rescued by a fellow cavalryman and with virtually obsolete weaponry, but its managed to hack a path to safety, still political significance was negligible and clutching the Standard that had been must be considered a pointless slaughter torn from its staff.
Recommended publications
  • The History of Scotland from the Accession of Alexander III. to The
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT LOS ANGELES THE GIFT OF MAY TREAT MORRISON IN MEMORY OF ALEXANDER F MORRISON THE A 1C MEMORIAL LIBRARY HISTORY OF THE HISTORY OF SCOTLAND, ACCESSION OF ALEXANDEB III. TO THE UNION. BY PATRICK FRASER TYTLER, ** F.RS.E. AND F.A.S. NEW EDITION. IN TEN VOLUMES. VOL. X. EDINBURGH: WILLIAM P. NIMMO. 1866. MUEKAY AND OIBB, PUINTERS. EDI.VBUKOII V.IC INDE X. ABBOT of Unreason, vi. 64 ABELARD, ii. 291 ABERBROTHOC, i. 318, 321 ; ii. 205, 207, 230 Henry, Abbot of, i. 99, Abbots of, ii. 206 Abbey of, ii. 205. See ARBROATH ABERCORN. Edward I. of England proceeds to, i. 147 Castle of, taken by James II. iv. 102, 104. Mentioned, 105 ABERCROMBY, author of the Martial Achievements, noticed, i. 125 n.; iv. 278 David, Dean of Aberdeen, iv. 264 ABERDEEN. Edward I. of England passes through, i. 105. Noticed, 174. Part of Wallace's body sent to, 186. Mentioned, 208; ii. Ill, n. iii. 148 iv. 206, 233 234, 237, 238, 248, 295, 364 ; 64, ; 159, v. vi. vii. 267 ; 9, 25, 30, 174, 219, 241 ; 175, 263, 265, 266 ; 278, viii. 339 ; 12 n.; ix. 14, 25, 26, 39, 75, 146, 152, 153, 154, 167, 233-234 iii. Bishop of, noticed, 76 ; iv. 137, 178, 206, 261, 290 ; v. 115, n. n. vi. 145, 149, 153, 155, 156, 167, 204, 205 242 ; 207 Thomas, bishop of, iv. 130 Provost of, vii. 164 n. Burgesses of, hanged by order of Wallace, i. 127 Breviary of, v. 36 n. Castle of, taken by Bruce, i.
    [Show full text]
  • Bowl Round 4 Bowl Round 4 First Quarter
    NHBB C-Set Bowl 2017-2018 Bowl Round 4 Bowl Round 4 First Quarter (1) In 1858, this object was recast in Whitechapel, after which a team spent 18 hours hauling this object to its belfry. This object was silenced following the death of Margaret Thatcher, and is currently disconnected during renovations of Elizabeth Tower. \Quarter bells" that play the Westminster Chimes every 15 minutes accompany, for ten points, what massive bell that names an iconic London clock tower? ANSWER: Big Ben (accept descriptive answers about the bell in Big Ben that say \Big Ben;" prompt on descriptive answers like \the bell in Westminster" that don't say \Big Ben;" prompt on the Great Bell) (2) Hermogenes recounts this man's desire to die relatively young in order to escape the afflictions of old age in an account of this man's Apology by Xenophon. This husband of Xanthippe was put to death by an Athenian tribunal by drinking hemlock on charges of corrupting the youth. For ten points, name this classical philosopher whose namesake \method" employs rigorous questioning and who mentored Plato. ANSWER: Socrates (3) This case was briefly interrupted when judge Robert Jackson suffered a heart attack. The \massive resistance" movement attempted to circumvent this case's ruling, which was to be carried out with \all deliberate speed." Thurgood Marshall argued for the plaintiffs in this case, which struck down Plessy vs. Ferguson. For ten points, name this Supreme Court case that overturned the \separate but equal" principle in public schools. ANSWER: Brown vs Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas (4) During this battle, heavy fighting took place near Papelotte and La Haye Sainte.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Environment Scotland Statement of Significance
    Property in Care (PIC) ID: PIC013 Designations: Scheduled Monument (SM90043) Taken into State care: 1973 (Ownership) Last reviewed: 2017 HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT SCOTLAND STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE BROUGHTY CASTLE We continually revise our Statements of Significance, so they may vary in length, format and level of detail. While every effort is made to keep them up to date, they should not be considered a definitive or final assessment of our properties. Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT SCOTLAND STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE BROUGHTY CASTLE CONTENTS 1 Summary 2 1.1 Introduction 2 1.2 Statement of significance 2 2 Assessment of values 3 2.1 Background 3 2.2 Evidential values 6 2.3 Historical values 7 2.4 Architectural and artistic values 9 2.5 Landscape and aesthetic values 12 2.6 Natural heritage values 13 2.7 Contemporary/use values 13 3 Major gaps in understanding 14 4 Associated properties 15 5 Keywords 15 Bibliography 15 APPENDICES Appendix 1: Timeline 16 Appendix 2: A contribution on the 19th- and 20th-century 22 defences of Broughty Castle Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH 1 1 Summary 1.1 Introduction Broughty Castle is an imposing stronghold situated on a promontory at the mouth of the Tay estuary, unusually combining elements of medieval and Victorian military architecture. Its history reflects several turbulent episodes in Scotland’s last 500 years of history, and encapsulates the story of the defence of the Tay estuary.
    [Show full text]
  • 126613796.23.Pdf
    SC5». S, f # I PUBLICATIONS OF THE SCOTTISH HISTORY SOCIETY THIRD SERIES VOLUME LI WIGTOWNSHIRE CHARTERS I960 WIGTOWNSHIRE CHARTERS Edited by R. C. REID, LL.D. EDINBURGH Printed by T. and A. Constable Ltd. Printers to the University of Edinburgh for the Scottish History Society 1960 Printed in Great Britain PREFACE This volume represents some ten years voluntary work undertaken for the National Register of Archives since that body was first formed. It has involved the examination, calendaring and indexing of all documents prior to the year 1600 of the following collections presently lodged in the Register House: Charters of the Earl of Galloway, Lochnaw (Agnew) Charters, Logan (McDowell) Charters, and Barnbarroch (Vaus) Charters; in addition to the following collections, still in private hands, Mochrum Park (Dunbar) Charters, Myrton (McCulloch) Charters, Monreith (Maxwell) Charters, the Craichlaw and Shennanton Papers, and the Cardoness and Kirkconnell Charters, as well as much unpublished material in the Scottish Record Office. I have to express my thanks to the owners and custodians for giving me the necessary access and facilities. In the presentation and editing of these documents I have received ready assistance from many quarters, but I would fail in my duty if I did not mention especially Mrs. A. I. Dunlop, LL.D., and Dr. Gordon Donaldson, who have ungrudgingly drawn on their wide experience as archivists, and Mr. Athol Murray, LL.B., of the Scottish Record Office, who has called my attention to documents and entries in the public records and even undertaken a search of the Registers of the Archbishops of York.
    [Show full text]
  • On Your Doorstep
    Heritage on your doorstep 1–17 SEPTEMBER 2017 east lothian Archaeology & Local History Fortnight BOOKING ESSENTIAL Book online: www.eastlothian.gov.uk/archaeologyfortnight Events (unless marked ) JOINING INSTRUCTIONS GIVEN ON BOOKING FRI 1ST – SUN 10TH SEPT The Big Waggonway Dig East Lothian Archaeology & Local History Fortnight is organised annually by East Lothian Council’s Archaeology Service. Find out more about what we Cockenzie Harbour 10am – 4pm do and events throughout the year at www.eastlothian.gov.uk/archaeology Book your dig session: Led by the 1722 Waggonway Heritage The fortnight is part of Archaeology Scotland’s annual Scottish Archaeology EventsGroup, come and try your hand at COCKENZIE HARBOUR COVER ILLUSTRATION: © ALAN BRABY ILLUSTRATION: COVER Month. For more information visit www.archaeologyscotland.org.uk archaeology as we uncover the remains FRI 1ST – SUN 3RD of part of the Cadell’s 1815 iron railway FRI 8TH & SAT 9TH at Cockenzie Harbour. There are loads DIG SESSIONS of different tasks to help with, from 10am – 3pm Disabled access Primarily for adults 16+ digging to cleaning finds and with Or drop in for a quick try! Partial disabled access Family event ‘living history’ salt making at Cockenzie House & Gardens, storytelling from No disabled access Sturdy footwear/ appropriate clothing Tim Porteus and much, much more. There’s something for all the family. COCKENZIE HOUSE & GARDENS NO DOGS PLEASE EXCEPT GUIDE DOGS. FRI 1ST – SUN 10TH Drop by any time to see the dig, or join a guided tour of the site, daily at 11:30.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of Selected Scottish Battlefields
    Scotland’s Historic Fields of Conflict Gazetteer: page 1 GAZETTEER OF SELECTED SCOTTISH BATTLEFIELDS LIST OF CONTENTS ABERDEEN II ............................................................................................................. 4 ALFORD ...................................................................................................................... 9 ANCRUM MOOR...................................................................................................... 19 AULDEARN .............................................................................................................. 26 BANNOCKBURN ..................................................................................................... 34 BOTHWELL BRIDGE .............................................................................................. 59 BRUNANBURH ........................................................................................................ 64 DRUMCLOG ............................................................................................................. 66 DUNBAR II................................................................................................................ 71 DUPPLIN MOOR ...................................................................................................... 79 FALKIRK I ................................................................................................................ 87 FALKIRK II ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Feuding, Factionalism, and Religion in the Chaseabout Raid
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Honors Program in History (Senior Honors Theses) Department of History March 2008 Their Nation Dishonored, the Queen Shamed, and Country Undone: Feuding, Factionalism, and Religion in the Chaseabout Raid Rachel Omansky [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hist_honors Omansky, Rachel, "Their Nation Dishonored, the Queen Shamed, and Country Undone: Feuding, Factionalism, and Religion in the Chaseabout Raid" (2008). Honors Program in History (Senior Honors Theses). 10. https://repository.upenn.edu/hist_honors/10 A Senior Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Honors in History. Faculty Advisor: Margo Todd This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hist_honors/10 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Their Nation Dishonored, the Queen Shamed, and Country Undone: Feuding, Factionalism, and Religion in the Chaseabout Raid Abstract The mid-sixteenth century witnessed religious and political upheaval across much of Western Europe, particularly in the British Isles. In 1565, a good portion of the Scottish nobility rebelled against their sovereign, Mary, Queen of Scots. The roles played and decisions made by the nobles during this revolt, known as the Chaseabout Raid, provide important insights concerning the converging issues of feuding, factionalism, and religion in Scotland. My reconstructed narrative of the Chaseabout Raid indicates that there were, in fact, no firm factions determined yb ideology, but rather shifting allegiances in the midst of conflict, determined yb complex and interrelated factors, personalities, and motivations. The primary motivation for the coalitions formed during the Chaseabout Raid was selfish personal ambition—base desire for individual gain still superseded any proto-nationalistic ideas or purely ideological commitments.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Scottish De Quencys of Fawside and Leuchars. by William W
    SCOTTIS E QUENCYSHD F FAWSIDO ' E AND LEUCHARS. 5 27 . II . NOTES ON THE SCOTTISH DE QUENCYS OF FAWSIDE AND LEUCHARS. BY WILLIAM W. IKELAND, M.D., F.S.A. SOOT. Nothing is more striking than the rapid degeneracy of the Germanic races who settled amongst the Latinised peoples of Western Europe. e descendantTh e conquerorth f o s s fel a prel n theii y e r th tur o t n incursions of the Northmen who occupied various parts of England and Scotland d foundean , a dpowerfu l dukedo e nortth f Eranceo hn mi . But instead of sinking into sensuality and sloth, the Normans showed a spirit of heroic adventure which lasted through many generations. It is a signal proof of the superiority of the race that many of them found successful careers beyon e countriedth s which they conquered. Norman soldier f fortuno s e sought foreign lands, gained powe wealthd an r d an , founded great familie eved an sn royal dynasties e pitilesTh . s spoliation e Saxonoth f s afte Normae th r n Conques f Englano t d might well have mad rulere eth f neighbourino s g countries war f allowinyo gfootina o gt those encroaching adventurers, yet we find the Gaelic kings of Scotland, who gave a refuge to the fugitives from the cruelty of William the Conqueror, welcoming Normans amongs e Saxoth t n populatioe th f o n Border counties. Tha e nobilitth t f Englano y s e Normath wa d s wa n resul f conquesto t , thae nobleo manth s t f f Scotlano o ys d werf o e Norman origi s e electioowin e th Scottisnwa th o t gf no h kings.
    [Show full text]
  • Trickery, Mockery and the Scottish Way of War
    Trickery, Mockery and the Scottish Way of War By Alastair J. Macdonald University of Aberdeen Published by The University of Aberdeen – Aberdeen University Research Archive (AURA) October 2013 http://aura.abdn.ac.uk Published in AURA with the kind permission of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland Trickery, Mockery and the Scottish Way of War This article seeks to examine two prominent themes, those of trickery and mockery, in how warfare against England was represented in Scottish historical narratives of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. Careful analysis of these specific themes allows a variety of insights to be presented. It will show some of the rich uses to which such texts can be put by exploring them in a historically informed context. One aspect of this is the endeavour to illuminate ways in which these sources, although treacherous in relation to specifics, can provide accurate, and previously unnoticed, more general insights into the cultures of war embraced by the Scots. Analysis of the texts also demonstrates the complex and changing ways in which perceptions about the practice of war have shaped Scottish senses of identity. It becomes clear that ideas about their mode of war were vital in how the Scots saw themselves. And such ideas were also fundamental in shaping the much more hostile view of them developed by their regular enemies, the English. The main sources given consideration are the Gesta Annalia II, once attributed to John of Fordun (composed c1363) (Chron Fordun)1, John Barbour’s The Bruce (c1376) (Barbour, Bruce), the ‘Anonymous Chronicle’ (probably early 1390s)2, Andrew of Wyntoun’s Original Chronicle (completed c1424) (Chron Wyntoun), Walter Bower’s Scotichronicon (completed 1447) (Chron Bower) and Blind Hary’s The Wallace (c1476-8) (Hary, Wallace).
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Loretto
    The History of Loretto 1. The Early Years 2. Pinkie House 3. The Langhornes, 1825 - 1862 4. Hely Hutchinson Almond, 1862 - 1903 5. Loretto School Limited 6. H.B. Tristram 1903 - 1908 7. A.R. Smith, 1908 - 1926 8. Dr J.R.C Greenlees, 1926 - 1945 9. Loretto School Trustees 10. D.F. Mackintosh, 1945 - 1960 11. R.B. Bruce Lockhard, 1960 - 1976 12. D.B. McMurray, 1976 - 1984 13. The Rev. N.W. Drummond, 1984 - 1995 14. K.J. Budge, 1995 - 2000 15. M.B. Mavor, 2001 - 2008 This History of Loretto appears in the published book The Loretto Register 1825-2000, but has been here updated to take account of the events since its original publication 1. The Early Days The history of Eskmouth, Muscilbury or Musselburgh, for the town has borne all three names at various periods, goes back to the Roman occupation of Britain. It is established beyond doubt that the Romans fortified the hill of Inveresk, which flanks Musselburgh on the south, and we may suppose that Musselburgh and the valley of the Esk were even in those early times fairly populous places. At the time of the Roman occupation, however, it is quite likely that the site which is now occupied by Loretto School was, if not actually covered by the sea at high tide, at least little more than foreshore. We may picture it perhaps as mounds of blown sand covered with bents and coarse grass, fertilised from time to time by deposits from the overflow of the Esk or the Pinkie Burn.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedoms Sword
    The Scottish Wars against England Male lust and a mole can be blamed for the opening of the Scottish Wars of Independence. The male lust was in the breast of Alexander the Third, The King of Scots. (Note that the ruler is not King of Scotland but King of Scots.) Alexander had a new French wife, Yolande, and longed throughout the council meeting in Edinburgh to be back with his wife across the storm lashed Firth of Forth in Fife. Against all advice, Alexander set out for Fife and barely made it across the Forth by boat before galloping off with two attendants. In the storm the riders lost sight of each other and next morning the body of the king was found at the foot of the cliffs at Kinghorn. Legend has it that his horse was startled by a mole and both rider and horse fell over the cliff. The good news was that there was an heir but she was a mere female child and the granddaughter of the King of Norway. Not ideal for a faction driven Scotland but even this lifeline was lost when the Maid of Norway died shortly after landing in Scotland. Two factions now contended for the throne namely the Balliols and the Bruces who represented the most powerful noble sin the land. Into this argument came Edward the First of England who agreed to adjudicate as an honest and impartial broker. To be fair to Edward, his decision to award John Balliol the crown was probably the right one as he just about had a stronger claim.
    [Show full text]
  • The Clan Macdougall Society of North America Representing Clan Macdowall and Clan Macdougall
    The Correct Crest-Badge of MacDowall Clansmen Today THE CLAN OF THE MACDOWALLS OF GALLOWAY MacDowall Tartan Hunting Stewart (A New Tartan) (Also Worn By MacDowalls) The Clan MacDougall Society of North America Representing Clan MacDowall and Clan MacDougall Invites You To Visit Our Website At www.macdougall.org Prof. Fergus Macdowall of Garthland Chief of the MacDowalls Personal Coat of Arms of Chief of the MacDowalls, Drawn by The Correct Crest-Badge of Prof. Walter M. Macdougall MacDowall Clansmen Today The Clan of the MacDowalls of Galloway CHIEF Prof. Fergus Day Hort Macdowall is currently Chief of the Name and Arms of MacDowall, feudal baron of Garthland and next heir-male of Prince Fergus Lord of Galloway. Prince Fergus was the grandfather-in-law of King Somerled of Argyll and the Isles the patriarch of the MacDougalls of Argyll et al. who were not otherwise intermarried with MacDowalls. Professor Macdowall is an Honorary President of the Clan MacDougall Society of North America which has a strong membership of MacDowalls (however spelt) who are recognized as a clan by the Standing Council of Scottish Chiefs. BRANCHES AND EXTENDED NAMES The Family name was derived as “Macdougall” from Prince Fergus’ grandson, Duegald, second son of Uchtred Lord of Galloway and who was killed (1185) while fighting on the side of his brother Roland in a feudal reconquest of Galloway. The Galloway name of “Macdougall” was transliterated to “Macdowyl” in July 1292 under Edward I of England and Macdowall has persisted over the eight centuries since with many (about 76) variations. The early armigerous baronial stock of the MacDowall Family on surviving records starts from the Macdougalls of Garochloyne with Lougan-Elrig and continues through a century to the Macdowylls / Macdowalls of these lands and also of Garthland.
    [Show full text]