Controlling Nonspecific Adsorption of Proteins at Bio-Interfaces for Biosensor and Biomedical Applications
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-2009 Controlling Nonspecific Adsorption of Proteins at Bio-Interfaces for Biosensor and Biomedical Applications Harshil D. Dhruv Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering Commons Recommended Citation Dhruv, Harshil D., "Controlling Nonspecific Adsorption of Proteins at Bio-Interfaces for Biosensor and Biomedical Applications" (2009). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 276. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/276 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONTROLLING NONSPECIFIC ADSORPTION OF PROTEINS AT BIO- INTERFACES FOR BIOSENSOR AND BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS by Harshil D. Dhruv A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Biological Engineering Approved: __________________________ __________________________ David W. Britt Anhong Zhou Committee Chairman Committee Member __________________________ __________________________ Soonjo Kwon Marie K. Walsh Committee Member Committee Member __________________________ __________________________ Silvana Martini Byron R. Burnham Committee Member Dean of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNVERSITY Logan, Utah 2009 ii Copyright © Harshil D. Dhruv 2009 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Controlling Nonspecific Adsorption of Proteins at Bio-interfaces for Biosensor and Biomedical Applications by Harshil D. Dhruv, Doctor of Philosophy Utah State University, 2009 Major Professor: Dr. David W. Britt Department: Biological and Irrigation Engineering Partitioning of poly(ethyleneglycol) (PEG) molecules in 2-D and 3-D systems is presented as a self-assembly approach for controlling non-specific adsorption of proteins at interfaces. Lateral restructuring of multi-component Langmuir monolayers to accommodate adsorbing proteins was investigated as a model 2-D system. Ferritin adsorption to monolayers containing cationic, nonionic, and PEG bearing phospholipids induced protein sized binding pockets surrounded by PEG rich regions. The number, size, and distribution of protein imprint sites were controlled by the molar ratios, miscibility, and lateral mobility of the lipids. The influence of PEG chain length on the ternary monolayer restructuring and protein distribution was also investigated using DSPE-PEGx (x= 7, 16, 22). Monolayer miscibility analysis demonstrated that longer PEG chains diminished the condensed phase formation for a fixed ratio of lipids. Thus, incorporation of longer PEG chains, iv intended to diminish protein adsorption outside of the imprint sites of cationic / non-ionic lipids, leads to dramatic changes in monolayer phase behavior and protein distribution in this 2-D system. The assembly of PEG-amphiphiles at elastomer surfaces and subsequent protein adsorption was investigated as a model 3-D system. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrates were modified with block copolymers comprised of PEG and PDMS segments by two methods: (1) the block copolymer was mixed with PDMS during polymerization; (2) the block copolymer diffused into solvent swollen PDMS monoliths. Hydrophilic surfaces resulted for both approaches that, for 600 D block copolymer, exhibited up to 85% reduction in fibrinogen adsorption as compared to native PDMS. Higher MW block copolymers (up to 3000 D) resulted in less hydrophilic surfaces and greater protein adsorption, presumably due to diffusion limitations of copolymer in the PDMS monolith. All modified PDMS surfaces were dynamic and restructured when cycled between air and water. PDMS transparency also decreased with increase in block copolymer concentration for both methods, limiting this modification protocol for applications requiring high polymer transparency. The 2-D system presents a bottom-up approach, where adsorbing protein constructs the binding site, while the 3-D system presents a top down approach, where protein-binding elements may be introduced into the PEG-bearing polymer for fabrication of surfaces with controlled protein adsorption. (220 pages) v To my parents Dinesh B. Dhruv and Poornima D. Dhruv and my loving wife Nikita Zaveri vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my professor and mentor, Dr. David W. Britt, for giving me the opportunity to dream, create, and discover in his laboratory during my PhD work. I would also like to thank other professors on my committee, including Dr. Marie K. Walsh, Dr. Anhong Zhou, Dr. Silvana Martini, and Dr. Soonjo Kwon, for their valuable support and advice during the course of my work. I am heartily thankful to the late Dr. Lyman S. Willardson for giving me the opportunity to study at Utah State University. I am thankful to all my colleagues at Dr. Britt’s lab for their help and discussion in improving my dissertation. I gratefully acknowledge the help given by Mr. Bradley Tuft for collecting stability study data for PDMS samples. I am also thankful to all my friends at Utah State University for giving me a friendly environment during the course of my studies. Finally, I would like to thank my parents, my sister, and my wife for their continuous support and encouragement they have provided me during these years, without which this journey would not have been possible for me. Harshil Dhruv vii CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT....................................................................................................................... iii DEDICATION................................................................................................................... vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................ vii LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................ xii LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... xiii LIST OF SCHEMES....................................................................................................... xxii LIST OF SYMBOLS, NOTATIONS, AND DEFINITIONS........................................ xxiii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1 1.1 Background...............................................................................................1 1.2 Hypothesis and Objectives........................................................................3 1.3 Dissertation Outline..................................................................................4 1.4 References.................................................................................................5 2 LITERATURE REVIEW........................................................................................8 2.1 Protein Adsorption to Biologically Relevant Surfaces .............................8 2.1.1 Specific Protein Adsorption..........................................................9 2.1.2 Non-specific Protein Adsorption ................................................10 2.1.2.1 Causes of Non-specific Protein Adsorption.................10 2.1.2.2 Consequences of Non-specific Protein Adsorption....................................................................14 2.2 Surface Modification to Prevent Non-specific Protein Adsorption........17 2.3 Protein Repellent/Nonfouling Coating Materials ...................................18 2.3.1 Biomemetic Materials.................................................................19 2.3.1.1 Phosphorylcholines (PC).............................................20 viii 2.3.1.2 Oligo/Polysaccharides..................................................21 2.3.2 Synthetic Polymers .....................................................................23 2.3.2.1 Polyacrylates................................................................23 2.3.2.2 Oligo- and Poly(ethyleneglycol)s ................................25 2.4 Poly(ethyleneglycol) (PEG)....................................................................25 2.4.1 PEG Properties............................................................................26 2.4.1.1 The Physical View of Fouling Resistance ...................27 2.4.1.2 The Chemical View of Fouling Resistance .................28 2.5 Traditional PEG Surface Immobilization Methods ................................30 2.5.1 Graft Copolymerization ..............................................................31 2.5.2 Chemical Coupling.....................................................................35 2.5.3 Non-covalent Immobilization .....................................................38 2.5.3.1 Physisorption................................................................39 2.5.3.2 Langmuir and Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) Technique.....................................................................40 2.5.3.2.1 Langmuir Monolayers................................40 2.5.3.2.2 Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) Films..................43 2.5.3.2.3 Langmuir and LB Films for Protein Repellent Coatings.....................................44 2.6 Langmuir and LB Films for Protein Patterning ......................................45 2.7 Poly(Dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS)............................................................49