The Alberta Province Tax Specifically Targets Professional Hockey Players in Order to Help Finance Its Professional Franchises Alan Pogroszewski
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Marquette Sports Law Review Volume 14 Article 8 Issue 2 Spring Is Canada Overstepping Its Borders? The Alberta Province Tax Specifically Targets Professional Hockey Players in order to Help Finance Its Professional Franchises Alan Pogroszewski Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/sportslaw Part of the Entertainment and Sports Law Commons Repository Citation Alan Pogroszewski, Is Canada Overstepping Its Borders? The Alberta Province Tax Specifically Targets Professional Hockey Players in order to Help Finance Its Professional Franchises, 14 Marq. Sports L. Rev. 509 (2004) Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/sportslaw/vol14/iss2/8 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IS CANADA OVERSTEPPING ITS BORDERS? THE ALBERTA PROVINCE TAX SPECIFICALLY TARGETS PROFESSIONAL HOCKEY PLAYERS IN ORDER TO HELP FINANCE ITS PROFESSIONAL FRANCHISES ALAN POGROSZEWSKI In the fall of 2002, the Canadian province of Alberta implemented a 12.5% tax on all income earned by National Hockey League (NHL) players 1 who play games in the province's two NHL cities of Edmonton and Calgary. This first-in-Canada tax on professional hockey players is designed to help the province's struggling NHL teams, without using the province's taxpayer money.2 The tax, which will apply only to NHL players, and will not apply to coaches, trainers, or visiting management, is expected to result in a gross revenue stream of U.S. $5,000,000.00 per year,3 which will be made available to the teams, less the cost of administration. 4 The tax will be imposed on NHL players who perform services in the province of Alberta from August 31, 5 2002, until December 31, 2005. There are roughly 700 players currently playing in the NHL.6 With nearly all NHL players scheduled to play in either Edmonton or Calgary over the next season, each one of these athletes will need guidance on how they are affected by this tax. NHL players need to be educated on the potential tax credits available to them, as well as to any double taxation issues. Professional sports are a big business, and athletes need to be aware of their current financial and tax landscape. Knowledge of how this tax affects NHL players and the 1. Alberta Revenue, Tax and Revenue Administration, Alberta PersonalIncome Tax Act - NHL Players Tax -Information Circular, Sept. 10, 2002, at www.revenue.gov.ab.ca/publications/tax_ rebates/nhl/nhl I.html. 2. John Cotter, Alberta to Bring Tax on Visiting NHL Players to Help Oilers, Flames, YAHOO! CANADA SPORTS, Mar. 5, 2002, at http://ca.sports.yahoo.com/020306/6/km8u.html. 3. All currency figures used in this article will be in U.S. dollars. 4. Alberta Personal Income Tax Act, R.S.A. ch. A-30, § 48.1(1)(d) (2002) (Can.), available at http://www.canlii.org/ab/sta/csa/20030217/r.s.a.2000c.a-30/whole.html (last visited Feb. 17, 2004). 5. Id. § 48.6(b). 6. NATIONAL HoCKEY LEAGUE, OFFICIAL GUIDE & RECORD BooK/2002 338-599 (2002). MARQUETTE SPORTS LA W REVIEW [Vol. 14.2 education to protect these athletes from being over taxed is just as important in the current market place as securing their next big contract. Athletes performing services in other international leagues that have franchises based in Canada should also be aware of the Alberta NHL tax. As Alberta Premier Ralph Klein points out, "I'm sure that other provincial jurisdictions that have NHL teams will look at it as well, based on the Alberta model." 7 It is plausible that other Canadian provinces may look to implement similar taxes on other professional athletes, affecting the tax structure of athletes who perform in not only the NHL, but in addition, Major League Baseball and the National Basketball Association. Furthermore, the Alberta NHL tax also affects U.S. tax revenue. Under 26 U.S.C. § 901(a), the U.S. provides a tax credit reducing U.S. income tax on a dollar-for-dollar basis on foreign taxes paid. Consequently, through a foreign tax credit for U.S. resident NHL players, U.S. tax revenue is reduced by the same amount of tax that has been paid to Alberta. In essence, the U.S., through 26 U.S.C. § 901(a), is aiding the Alberta Premier in collecting revenue for his struggling NHL franchises. This article will begin with the history of financial difficulties affecting the Alberta NHL teams that led to the implementation of this provision. This will be followed by a review of the NHL Players' Association's (NHLPA) objection to the tax, along with an overview of the Alberta NHL tax. Since the Alberta NHL tax is in some respects similar to current U.S. state income tax currently subjected to NHL players, a comparison between the two taxes will follow. This section will outline who is subject to tax and how each jurisdiction apportions the percentage of compensation earned in its state or province. The article then examines the potential for double taxation, as well as the ability of U.S. residents to claim a foreign tax credit. Finally, the article concludes with a look at the potential ramifications of this tax, while reiterating the importance for NHL players to be aware of who is subject to the Alberta NHL tax and what tax credits are available to them. SECTION II HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Over the past ten years, Canadian hockey teams, specifically the two teams based in Alberta, have had financial difficulty competing against the teams based in the U.S. Two major reasons behind this difficulty include the 7. Cotter, supra note 2. 2004] IS CANADA OVERSTEPPING ITS BORDERS? devaluation of the Canadian dollar and the increase in players' salaries.8 In 1991 the Canadian dollar was worth 0.87 in comparison to the U.S. dollar.9 In the ten years since, the Canadian dollar has dropped 34% in value, with it currently (2001) worth 0.64 to the U.S. dollar (see Exhibit 1). In that same time period, NHL salaries have escalated from an average of U.S. $368,000.00 in 1991 to U.S. $1,434,885.00 for the 2000-01 NHL season (see Exhibit 2). l0 The combination of these two factors has made it increasingly difficult for Canadian teams, such as Edmonton and Calgary, to compete in the U.S.-dominated NHL. I1 EXHIBIT 1 Canada/U.S. Exchange Rate 1991-200112 EXCHANGE RATE 1 ]! co S 0.50.7 ----- - 0i: 0.4,0.6 0=.3- ........ S 0.1 0 1 1 1 2 2001 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 8. Nat'l Hockey League v. Nat'l Hockey League Players' Ass'n 9 (Mar. 3, 2003) (Parker, Arb.) (unpublished arbitration decision) (on file with author). 9. Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Canada and United States Interest Rates and Exchange Rate, 1974-2002, at www.agric.gov.ab.ca/economic/yearbook/interest.pdf (last visited Jan. 13, 2004). 10. NHL Players' Ass'n, Average NHL League Salary (unpublished manuscript, on file with author). 11. Twenty-four of the thirty teams currently in the NHL are based in the U.S. 12. Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, supra, note 9. MARQUETTE SPORTS LAW REVIEW [Vol. 14.2 It is within this economic landscape that on January 18, 2000, the Canadian Federal Government proposed to subsidize the six Canadian teams out of general government funds. 13 Within three days, the proposal died following strenuous opposition from provincial government leaders and the general public. Canadian Industry Minister John Manley speculated that the death of the proposal could prompt some Canadian teams, including the 14 Flames and Oilers, to relocate to the U.S. EXHIBIT 2 Average NHL Salary 1991-200015 AVERAGE LEAGUE SALARY All currency in US.dollars S$600,000 SL400,000 $1,00,000 S600,000 ... $00,000 -, -- . .... - ----- S 9 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 202000 Following the failure of the government's proposal, the Calgary Flames and the Edmonton Oilers proposed their own "Visiting Player Tax" to the Alberta parliament. 16 Calgary Flames CFO Michael Holditch even suggested that the levy be called a "tax" rather than a "fee" to increase the likelihood that 13. Nat ' Hockey League, supra note 8, at 5. 14. Id. 15. NHL Players' Ass'n, supra note 10. 16. Nat 'l Hockey League, supra note 8, at 6. 2004] IS CANADA OVERSTEPPING ITS BORDERS? players on American teams would be entitled to a U.S. tax credit. 17 The primary element of the proposal is to impose a tax, which is the same as what all Alberta residents are subject to, on all NHL players from visiting teams that play hockey in the province. The tax would raise approximately $5,000,000.00, which would be split evenly between the Edmonton Oilers and the Calgary Flames to help cover the cost of their operation of facilities in Alberta. 18 Alberta's idea is not a novel one. U.S. states have long looked to increase revenue through the taxation of visiting athletes performing services in their jurisdictions. Over the past decade the number of U.S. states that have required nonresident athletes to pay tax on income earned in their jurisdictions has increased dramatically. The attraction in taxing the income of nonresident, professional athletes, specifically professional hockey players, is clear. 19 First, as Exhibit 2 indicates, the income of NHL players has increased substantially over the past decade.