DOCSLIB.ORG

TAR and Non-Benefit List: Codes 40000 Thru 49999 Page Updated: January 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TAR and Non-Benefit List: Codes 40000 Thru 49999 Page Updated: January 2021 tar and non cd4 1 TAR and Non-Benefit List: Codes 40000 thru 49999 Page updated: January 2021 Surgery Digestive System Note: Refer to the TAR and Non-Benefit: Introduction to List in this manual for more information about the categories of benefit restrictions. Lips Excision Code Description Benefit Restrictions 40490 Biopsy of lip Assistant Surgeon services not payable Other Procedures Code Description Benefit Restrictions 40799 Unlisted procedure, lips Requires TAR, Primary Surgeon/ Provider Vestibule of Mouth Incision Code Description Benefit Restrictions 40800 Drainage of abscess/cyst, mouth, simple Assistant Surgeon services not payable 40801 Drainage of abscess/cyst, mouth, complicated Assistant Surgeon services not payable 40804 Removal of embedded foreign body, mouth, simple Assistant Surgeon services not payable 40805 Removal of embedded foreign body, mouth, Assistant Surgeon complicated services not payable 40806 Incision labial frenum Non-Benefit Excision Code Description Benefit Restrictions 40808 Biopsy, vestibule of mouth Assistant Surgeon services not payable 40810 Excision of lesion mucosa/submucosa, mouth, without Non-Benefit repair Part 2 – TAR and Non-Benefit List: Codes 40000 thru 49999 tar and non cd4 2 Page updated: January 2021 Excision (continued) Code Description Benefit Restrictions 40812 Excision of lesion mucosa/submucosa, mouth, simple Assistant Surgeon repair services not payable 40816 Excision of lesion, mouth, mucosa/submucosa, Assistant Surgeon complex services not payable 40819 Excision of frenum, labial or buccal Assistant Surgeon services not payable 40820 Destruction of lesion/scar by physical methods Assistant Surgeon services not payable Repair Code Description Benefit Restrictions 40830 Closure of laceration, vestibule of mouth, 2.5 cm or Assistant Surgeon less services not payable Other Procedures Code Description Benefit Restrictions 40899 Unlisted procedure, vestibule of mouth Requires TAR, Primary Surgeon/ Provider Tongue, Floor of Mouth Incision Code Description Benefit Restrictions 41000 Intraoral incision and drainage of abscess; lingual Assistant Surgeon services not payable 41005 Intraoral incision and drainage of abscess; sublingual, Assistant Surgeon superficial services not payable 41007 Intraoral incision and drainage of abscess; submental Assistant Surgeon space services not payable 41008 Intraoral incision and drainage of abscess; Assistant Surgeon submandibular space services not payable 41009 Intraoral incision and drainage of abscess; masticator Assistant Surgeon space services not payable 41010 Incision lingual frenum Assistant Surgeon services not payable Part 2 – TAR and Non-Benefit List: Codes 40000 thru 49999 tar and non cd4 3 Page updated: January 2021 Incision (continued) Code Description Benefit Restrictions 41016 Extraoral incision and drainage of abscess; submental Assistant Surgeon services not payable 41017 Extraoral incision and drainage of abscess; Assistant Surgeon submandibular services not payable 41018 Extraoral incision and drainage of abscess; masticator Assistant Surgeon space services not payable Excision Code Description Benefit Restrictions 41100 Biopsy of tongue, anterior two-thirds Assistant Surgeon services not payable 41105 Biopsy of tongue, posterior one-third Assistant Surgeon services not payable 41108 Biopsy of floor of mouth Assistant Surgeon services not payable 41115 Excision of lingual frenum Non-Benefit 41116 Excision, lesion of floor of mouth Assistant Surgeon services not payable Repair Code Description Benefit Restrictions 41250 Repair of laceration, 2.5 cm or less; floor of mouth Assistant Surgeon and/or anterior two-thirds of tongue services not payable 41251 Repair of laceration, 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Disease and Staging of Cancers in Adult Patients with Gastroenterological Or Oncological Disease: Guidelines
    TITLE: Endoscopic Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Disease and Staging of Cancers in Adult Patients with Gastroenterological or Oncological Disease: Guidelines DATE: 26 February 2014 RESEARCH QUESTION What are the evidence-based guidelines for the use of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of disease and staging of cancers in adult patient with gastroenterological or oncological disease? KEY MESSAGE Thirteen evidence-based guidelines regarding the use of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of disease and staging of cancers in adult patient with gastroenterological or oncological disease were identified. METHODS A limited literature search was conducted on key resources including PubMed, The Cochrane Library (2014, Issue 2), University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) databases, Canadian and major international health technology agencies, as well as a focused Internet search. Methodological filters were applied to limit retrieval to guidelines. The search was also limited to English language documents published between January 1, 2009 and February 11, 2014. Internet links were provided, where available. The summary of findings was prepared from the abstracts of the relevant information. Please note that data contained in abstracts may not always be an accurate reflection of the data contained within the full article. RESULTS Thirteen evidence-based guidelines regarding the staging and diagnosis of cancer and of gastrointestinal diseases were identified. Additional references of potential interest are provided in the appendix. Disclaimer: The Rapid Response Service is an information service for those involved in planning and providing health care in Canada. Rapid responses are based on a limited literature search and are not comprehensive, systematic reviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Adjustable Gastric Banding
    7 Review Article Page 1 of 7 Adjustable gastric banding Emre Gundogdu, Munevver Moran Department of Surgery, Medical School, Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey Contributions: (I) Conception and design: All authors; (II) Administrative support: All authors; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: All authors; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: All authors; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: All authors; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors. Correspondence to: Emre Gündoğdu, MD, FEBS. Assistant Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical School, Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]. Abstract: Gastric banding is based on the principle of forming a small volume pouch near the stomach by wrapping the fundus with various synthetic grafts. The main purpose is to limit oral intake. Due to the fact that it is a reversible surgery, ease of application and early results, the adjustable gastric band (AGB) operation has become common practice for the last 20 years. Many studies have shown that the effectiveness of LAGB has comparable results with other procedures in providing weight loss. Early studies have shown that short term complications after LAGB are particularly low when compared to the other complicated procedures. Even compared to RYGB and LSG, short-term results of LAGB have been shown to be significantly superior. However, as long-term results began to emerge, such as failure in weight loss, increased weight regain and long-term complication rates, interest in the procedure disappeared. The rate of revisional operations after LAGB is rapidly increasing today and many surgeons prefer to convert it to another bariatric procedure, such as RYGB or LSG, for revision surgery in patients with band removed after LAGB.
    [Show full text]
  • OBESITY SURGERY: INDICATIONS, TECHNIQUES, WEIGHTLOSS and POSSIBLE COMPLICATIONS - Review Article
    REFERENCES: 1. Makauchi M, Mori T, Gunven P, et 3. Belghiti J, Noun R, Malafosse R, et T, Sauvanet A. Portal triad clamping or al. Safety of hemihepatic vascular occlusion al. Continuous versus intermittent portal hepatic vascular exclusion for major liver during resection of the liver. Surg Gynecol triad clamping for liver resection. A resection. A controlled study. Ann Surg. Obstet 1989; 130:824–831. controlled study. Ann Surg 1999; 229:369 1996 Aug; 224(2):155-61 2. Wobbes T, Bemelmans BLH, –375. 6. PE Clavien, S Yadav, d. Syndram, R. Kuypers JHC, et al. Risk of postoperative 4. J.R. Hiatt J.Gabbay,R W. Busuttil. Bently. Protective Effects of Ischemic septic complications after abdominal Surgical Anatomy of the Hepatic Arteries Preconditioning for Liver Resection surgery treatment in relation to in 1000 Cases. Ann Surg.1994 Vol. 220, Performed Under Inflow Occlusion in preoperative blood transfusion. Surg No. 1, 50-52 Humans. Ann Surg Vol. 232, No. 2, 155– Gynecol Obstet 1990; 171: 5. Belghiti J, Noun R, Zante E, Ballet 162 Corresponding author: Ludmil Marinov Veltchev, MD PhD Mobile: +359 876 259 685 E-mail: [email protected] Journal of IMAB - Annual Proceeding (Scientific Papers) 2009, book 1 OBESITY SURGERY: INDICATIONS, TECHNIQUES, WEIGHTLOSS AND POSSIBLE COMPLICATIONS - Review article Ludmil M. Veltchev Fellow, Master’s Program in Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Henri Bismuth Hepatobiliary Institute, 12-14, avenue Paul Vaillant-Couturier, 94804 Villejuif Cedex SUMMARY type of treatment is the only one leading to a lasting effect. In long-term perspective, the conservative treatment Basically, two mechanisms allow the unification of all of obesity is always doomed to failure and only the surgical known methods into three categories: method allows reducing obesity.
    [Show full text]
  • Three-Way Comparative Study of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided
    Surgical Endoscopy (2019) 33:1260–1270 and Other Interventional Techniques https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6406-7 Three-way comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural gallbladder drainage using lumen-apposing metal stents versus endoscopic transpapillary drainage versus percutaneous cholecystostomy for gallbladder drainage in high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: clinical outcomes and success in an International, Multicenter Study Ali Siddiqui1 · Rastislav Kunda3 · Amy Tyberg2 · Mustafa A. Arain4 · Arish Noor1 · Tayebah Mumtaz1 · Usama Iqbal1 · David E. Loren1 · Thomas E. Kowalski1 · Douglas G. Adler5 · Monica Saumoy2 · Monica Gaidhane2 · Shawn Mallery4 · Eric M. Christiansen4 · Jose Nieto6 · Michel Kahaleh2 Received: 9 November 2017 / Accepted: 24 August 2018 / Published online: 12 September 2018 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Background Percutaneous cholecystostomy tube (PTGBD), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with trans- papillary gallbladder drainage (TP), and endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural gallbladder drainage (EGBD) using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have been offered for gallbladder decompression for acute cholecystitis in high-risk surgical patients. Yet, there are limited data comparing these therapies. Our aim was to compare the safety and efficacy of EGBD to TP and PTGBD for gallbladder drainage. Methods We retrospectively collected high-risk surgical patients from six centers with acute cholecystitis who underwent gallbladder drainage by EGBD, TP, or PTGBD. Data included technical success (gallbladder drainage), clinical success (acute cholecystitis resolution), adverse events (AE), and follow-up. Results From 2010 to 2016, 372 patients underwent gallbladder drainage, with 146 by PTGBD, 124 by TP, and 102 drained by EGBD. Technical (98% vs. 88% vs. 94%; p = 0.004) and Clinical (97% vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Preoperative Endoscopic Ultrasound in Surgical Oncology
    REVIEW Impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound in surgical oncology Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has a strong impact on the imaging and staging of solid tumors within or in close proximity of the upper GI tract. Technological developments during the last two decades have increased the image quality and allowed very detailed visualization of local tumor spread and lymph node affection. Current indications for EUS of the upper GI tract encompass the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions, the staging of esophageal, gastric and pancreatic cancer, and the procurement of a biopsy specimen through fine-needle aspiration. Various technical innovations during the past two decades have increased the diagnostic quality and have simultaneously strengthened the role of EUS in the clinical setting. This article will give a compressed summary on the current state of EUS and possible further technical developments. 1 KEYWORDS: 3D imaging elastosonography endoscopic ultrasound miniprobes Sascha S Chopra & oncologic surgery Michael Hünerbein† 1Department of General & Transplantation Surgery, Charité Campus Virchow-Clinic, Berlin, Conventional endoscopic ultrasound the so-called ‘miniprobes’ into the biliary system Germany Linear versus radial systems or the pancreatic duct in order to obtain high-res- †Author for correspondence: Department of Surgery & Surgical Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with flex- olution radial ultrasound images locally. Present Oncology, Helios Hospital Berlin, ible endoscopes is an important diagnostic and mini probes show a diameter of 2–3 mm and oper- 13122 Berlin, Germany Tel.: +49 309 417 1480 therapeutic tool, especially for the local staging ate with frequencies between 12 and 30 MHz. Fax: +49 309 417 1404 of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, the differen- The main drawbacks of these devices are the lim- michael.huenerbein@ tiation between benign and malignant tumors, ited durability and the decreased depth of penetra- helios-kliniken.de and interventional procedures, such as biopsies tion (~2 cm).
    [Show full text]
  • Cigna Medical Coverage Policies – Radiology Neck Imaging Effective November 15, 2018
    Cigna Medical Coverage Policies – Radiology Neck Imaging Effective November 15, 2018 ______________________________________________________________________________________ Instructions for use The following coverage policy applies to health benefit plans administered by Cigna. Coverage policies are intended to provide guidance in interpreting certain standard Cigna benefit plans and are used by medical directors and other health care professionals in making medical necessity and other coverage determinations. Please note the terms of a customer’s particular benefit plan document may differ significantly from the standard benefit plans upon which these coverage policies are based. For example, a customer’s benefit plan document may contain a specific exclusion related to a topic addressed in a coverage policy. In the event of a conflict, a customer’s benefit plan document always supersedes the information in the coverage policy. In the absence of federal or state coverage mandates, benefits are ultimately determined by the terms of the applicable benefit plan document. Coverage determinations in each specific instance require consideration of: 1. The terms of the applicable benefit plan document in effect on the date of service 2. Any applicable laws and regulations 3. Any relevant collateral source materials including coverage policies 4. The specific facts of the particular situation Coverage policies relate exclusively to the administration of health benefit plans. Coverage policies are not recommendations for treatment and should never be used as treatment guidelines. This evidence-based medical coverage policy has been developed by eviCore, Inc. Some information in this coverage policy may not apply to all benefit plans administered by Cigna. These guidelines include procedures eviCore does not review for Cigna.
    [Show full text]
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound: What Is It and When Should It Be Used?
    CMJ0906-Willert.qxd 11/10/09 7:54 PM Page 539 ■ CLINICAL PRACTICE Clinical Medicine 2009, Vol 9, No 6: 539–43 Endoscopic ultrasound: what is it and when should it be used? Yogananda Reddy and Robert P Willert ABSTRACT – Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is an increasingly There are two types of commonly used echoendoscopes each available diagnostic and therapeutic tool used within the UK. with differing characteristics. Radial EUS was the first to be It has wide applications both in the gastrointestinal tract and developed and provides a 360-degree view in a plane perpendic- mediastinum with its current main uses being in the staging ular to that of the scope, similar to a computed tomography (CT) of luminal malignancies and assessment of pancreatic and image (Fig 2). Linear EUS provides a localised oblique image subepithelial lesions. The emergence of linear EUS has parallel to the scope and enables therapeutic intervention under opened up new therapeutic avenues with fine needle aspira- ultrasound (Fig 3). High frequency EUS mini-probes are also tion, trucut biopsies, coeliac plexus blocks and transmural available which can be passed down a standard biopsy channel of pseudocyst drainage all now possible. Future developments an endoscope in cases where strictures cannot be passed using a include localised brachytherapy/chemotherapy and alcohol standard EUS scope. ablation of unresectable pancreatic malignancies and EUS- guided endoscopic surgery. Indications for endoscopic ultrasound KEY WORDS: cancer staging, endoscopic ultrasound, fine The indications for EUS can be divided into several categories: needle aspiration • staging of GI malignancies • evaluating pancreaticobiliary disease Introduction • evaluating subepithelial abnormalities • evaluating extraluminal abnormalities Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was developed in the 1980s • staging of lung cancer but was rarely used within most of the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Policy Bariatric Surgery
    Medical Policy Bariatric Surgery Subject: Bariatric Surgery Background: Morbid obesity (also called clinically severe obesity) is a serious health condition that can interfere with basic physical functions such as breathing or walking and reduce life expectancy. Individuals who are morbidly obese are at greater risk for serious medical complications including hypertension, coronary artery disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, sleep apnea, gastroesophageal reflux disease and osteoarthritis. While the immediate cause of obesity is caloric intake that persistently exceeds caloric output, a limited number of cases may also be caused by illnesses such as hypothyroidism, Cushing's disease, and hypothalamic lesions. Nonsurgical strategies for achieving weight loss and weight maintenance (e.g., caloric restriction, increased physical activity, behavioral modification) are recommended for most overweight and obese persons. Bariatric (weight loss) surgery is a major surgical intervention and is indicated for adults and adolescents who have completed bone growth and are morbidly obese. Bariatric surgery procedures modify the anatomy of the gastrointestinal tract and cause weight loss by restricting the amount of food the stomach can hold, causing malabsorption of nutrients. Bariatric procedures can often cause hormonal and metabolic changes that result from gastric and intestinal surgery. Contraindications for bariatric surgeries include cardiac complications, significant respiratory dysfunction, non- compliance with medical treatment, psychological disorders that a psychologist/psychiatrist determines are likely to exacerbate or interfere with long-term management, significant eating disorders, and severe hiatal hernia/gastroesophageal reflux. Authorization: Prior authorization is required for bariatric surgeries provided to members enrolled in commercial (HMO, POS, PPO) products. Bariatric procedures can only be done at fully accredited centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band As a Revision Surgery for Failed Vertical Gastric Sleeve Or Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass
    Lincey Alexida, Xiaohua Qi, Patrick B. Asdell, José M. Martínez Landrón, Samarth B. Patel, Faustino Allongo. Frederick Tiesenga. Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band as a Revision Surgery for Failed Vertical Gastric Sleeve or Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. IAIM, 2017; 4(12): 37-42. Original Research Article Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band as a Revision Surgery for Failed Vertical Gastric Sleeve or Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Lincey Alexida1*, Xiaohua Qi2, Patrick B. Asdell3, José M. Martínez Landrón4, Samarth B. Patel5, Faustino Allongo6, Frederick Tiesenga7 14th year Medical Student, Saint James School of Medicine, 1480 Renaissance Drive, Suite 300, Park Ridge, IL 60068, USA 23rd year Medical Student, Saint James School of Medicine, 1480 Renaissance Drive, Suite 300, Park Ridge, IL 60068, USA 33rd year Medical Student, Saint James School of Medicine, 1480 Renaissance Drive, Suite 300, Park Ridge, IL 60068, USA 44th year Medical Student, American University of St. Vincent, 17950 Preston Rd #420, Dallas, TX 75252 53rd year medical student, Saint James School of Medicine, 1480 Renaissance Drive, Suite 300, Park Ridge, IL 60068, USA 63rd year medical student, Windsor University School of Medicine, 332 S Austin Blvd #2E, Oak Park Il, 60304 7 Medical Doctor, Department of Surgery, West Suburban Medical Center, 1950 N Harlem Ave, Elmwood Park, IL 60707, USA *Corresponding author email: [email protected] International Archives of Integrated Medicine, Vol. 4, Issue 12, December, 2017. Copy right © 2017, IAIM, All Rights Reserved. Available online at http://iaimjournal.com/ ISSN: 2394-0026 (P) ISSN: 2394-0034 (O) Received on: 02-11-2017 Accepted on: 16-11-2017 Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None declared.
    [Show full text]
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Placement of the Lumen-Apposing Self-Expandable Metallic Stent for Gallbladder Drainage: a Promising Technique
    REVIEW ARTICLE Annals of Gastroenterology (2016) 29, 162-167 Endoscopic ultrasound-guided placement of the lumen-apposing self-expandable metallic stent for gallbladder drainage: a promising technique Rashmee Patila, Mel A. Onab, Charilaos Papafragkakisc, Sury Anandb, Sushil Duddempudib Mount Sinai Health Systems New York, USA; The Brooklyn Hospital Center Academic Affiliate of The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Clinical Affiliate of The Mount Sinai Hospital, Brooklyn, New York; MD Anderson Cancer Center Academic and Clinical Affiliate of the University of Texas, Houston, USA Abstract Acute cholecystitis and other clinical problems requiring gallbladder removal or drainage have conventionally been treated with surgery, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or percutaneous transhepatic drainage of the gallbladder and/or extrahepatic bile duct. Patients unable to undergo these procedures due to functional status or anatomical anomalies are candidates for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided gallbladder drainage with stent placement. The aim of this review was to evaluate the technical feasibility and efficacy of EUS-guided placement of the recently developed lumen-apposing self-expandable metallic stent (LASEMS). A literature review was performed to identify the studies describing this technique. In this review article we have summarized case series or reports describing EUS-guided LASEMS placement. The indications, techniques, limitations and complications reported are discussed. A total of 78 patients were included across all studies described thus far in the literature. Studies have reported near 100% technical and clinical success rates in selected cases. No major complications were reported. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage and LASEMS placement can be a safe and effective alternative approach in the management of selected patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Gastrocolic Fistulae
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk REVIEW brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector International Journal of Surgery 10 (2012) 129e133 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect International Journal of Surgery journal homepage: www.theijs.com Review Gastrocolic fistulae; From Haller till nowadays Michael Stamatakos a,*, Ioannis Karaiskos b, Ioannis Pateras b, Ioannis Alexiou c, Charikleia Stefanaki d, Konstantinos Kontzoglou c a Generasl Surgeon, N. Athinaion M.D., Hospital, Athens, Greece b 1st Department of Surgery, Medical School, University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece c 2nd Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Medical School, University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece d Medic. Athens, Greece article info abstract Article history: Gastrocolic Fistula is, in the majority of cases the pathological communication between stomach and Received 5 April 2011 transverse colon, because cases involved with the small intestine, pancreas and skin have been also Received in revised form documented, even though are rare. It occurs mostly in adults, but they can be present to infants, as well, as 14 February 2012 a result of congenital abnormalities or iatrogenic procedures (i.e. migration of PEG tube that placed before). Accepted 15 February 2012 In the Western Countries, the most common cause is the adenocarcinoma of the colon, while in Japan, Available online 20 February 2012 adenocarcinoma of the stomach is the most frequent cause. It seldom appears, as a complication of a benign peptic ulcer, in Crohn’s disease and as a result of significant intake of steroids or NSAIDs. Keywords: fi Gastrocolic fistula The typical symptoms of a gastrocolic stula are abdominal pain, nausea-vomiting, diarrhea and Colocutaneous fistula weight loss.
    [Show full text]
  • ODONTOGENTIC INFECTIONS Infection Spread Determinants
    ODONTOGENTIC INFECTIONS The Host The Organism The Environment In a state of homeostasis, there is Peter A. Vellis, D.D.S. a balance between the three. PROGRESSION OF ODONTOGENIC Infection Spread Determinants INFECTIONS • Location, location , location 1. Source 2. Bone density 3. Muscle attachment 4. Fascial planes “The Path of Least Resistance” Odontogentic Infections Progression of Odontogenic Infections • Common occurrences • Periapical due primarily to caries • Periodontal and periodontal • Soft tissue involvement disease. – Determined by perforation of the cortical bone in relation to the muscle attachments • Odontogentic infections • Cellulitis‐ acute, painful, diffuse borders can extend to potential • fascial spaces. Abscess‐ chronic, localized pain, fluctuant, well circumscribed. INFECTIONS Severity of the Infection Classic signs and symptoms: • Dolor- Pain Complete Tumor- Swelling History Calor- Warmth – Chief Complaint Rubor- Redness – Onset Loss of function – Duration Trismus – Symptoms Difficulty in breathing, swallowing, chewing Severity of the Infection Physical Examination • Vital Signs • How the patient – Temperature‐ feels‐ Malaise systemic involvement >101 F • Previous treatment – Blood Pressure‐ mild • Self treatment elevation • Past Medical – Pulse‐ >100 History – Increased Respiratory • Review of Systems Rate‐ normal 14‐16 – Lymphadenopathy Fascial Planes/Spaces Fascial Planes/Spaces • Potential spaces for • Primary spaces infectious spread – Canine between loose – Buccal connective tissue – Submandibular – Submental
    [Show full text]