DOCSLIB.ORG

Collectanea Rerum Memorabilium ; Fationes Primum Vetusta, Deinde Novicia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Collectanea Rerum Memorabilium ; Fationes Primum Vetusta, Deinde Novicia ^ C. IYLII SOLINI COLLECTANEA RERVM MEMORABILIVM. ITEEVM EECENSVITj TH. MOMMSEN. I b 8 3 S ?. BEROLINI APUD WEIDMANNOS MDCCCXCV BIBLIOTHECIS GVELFERBYTANAE LEIDENSI PARISINAE QVAEVM BENIFICIO APVD EDITOREM TRES SOUNI OPTIMI CODICES FVERVNT SIMVL DOMI ET DVM LIBELLVS EXCVDITVR MANSERVNT GRA.TO ANTMO EDITOR BEROLINENSIS LIBRI ADHIBITI classis primae: 14-216) R = Vaticanus 3342 saec. X (deficit p. 197,2-202, 14. 203, descriptus ex R, collatus [R] = Vaticanus reginac 1875 Baec. XIV ubi is deficit; ipse finit p. 214, 4 C = Casinas 391 saec. XI JV = Havniensis 444 saec. XI H = Heidelbergensis saec. XI cousentientes *H = idem et Anonymus Leidensis Voss. fol. 113 dissentiens [H] = Heidelbergensis ab Anonymo Leidensi classis secundae: L = Leidensis Voss. quart. 87 saec. IX (deficit p. 194, 15) saec. XIII (incipit p. 191, 15) [L] = eiusdem libri supplementum a 12 31= Parisinus 7230 saec. X corruptus vel deficiens inde p. 174, Q = Parisinus 7230,4 saec. X collatus ibi ubi deficit M G = Guelferbytanus Gudianus 163 saec. X inde a p. 28,15 B = Basileensis F II 33 saec. XIV hic illic adhibitus classis tertiae: S = Sangallensis 187 saec. X 10-166, o) A = Angelomontanus saec. X (deficit p. 60, 20-63, 2. 163, XI/XII, colla- F = Florentinus Laurentianus S. Crucis 20 sin. 2 saec. tus ibi ubi deficit A P = Parisinus 6810 saec. X 117. 118. 139. 140. 150. 151. Libri reliqui adhibiti p. 7. 8. 14-16. 22-24. 30. habent in recensu (infra 164. 207—216 designantur numeris iis quos p. XXX - LII. LVI. LVII) notam significant lectionem a a b minusculae litterae adiectae ad codicis ab eadem (b); altera utra prima manu positam (a), deinde emendatam consentit cum textu ubi sola ponitur, lectio quae non ponitur adiecti ad codicis notam Bignificant lectio- l. 2 minusculi numeri similiter emendatam a manu diversa (2) nem a prima manu positam (1), deinde in similiter adiectae distinguunt duas lectiones t v minusculae litterae varia lectione (v) codice reperiri, alteram in textu (0,. alteram pro coniectura. * asterisco in textu notavimus locos emendatos I. AVCTOR ET AVCTORITATES C. lulii Solini tria nomina plena habet cotlex classis secundaeAuctonsno M tam in inscriptione libri quam in subscriptione laterculi praemissi reliquis eiusdem classis libris aut mutilis aut auctoris nomine destitutis. eadem tria nomiua agnoscunt libri ordinis tertii omnes. Iulium Solinum auctorem appellant libri ordinis primi in subscriptione omnes (CNII deficiente R) itemque Aldlielmus etOicuil. epistulae, quae praefationis locum obtinet, libri boni omnes excepto uno H solum Solini vocabulum praescri- bunt. denique Romanae aetatis auctores qui Solinum laudant omnes Genea- logus a. 455 Prisciauus Isidorus solum cognomeu ponunt. — Temere omnino coniecit Valesius (ad Dionem 74, S) auctorem huius libri esse nominatum a Dione (72, 12. 74, 2) Iulium Solonem infimae dignitatis senatorem caesum Severi iussu a. 193. inter personas honestiores Soli- num cognomen equidem non depreliendi et admodum rarum est apud plebeios quoque: invenitur tamen C. Iulius Solinus in titulo Asturi- ricensi C. I. L. II, 2650, Solinus nude in Britannico C. VII, 31 et in vasculis C. VII, 1331, 104. 1336, 1081. 1082. XII, 5686, 847. — Grammaticus auctor dicitur in subscriplione libioium classium secundae et lertiae, potest- que appellatio ea prolicisci aut ab auclore ipso aut a Iibrario aequaevo, u t Prisciani laudibus in Anastasium subscriptum est 'dictae a Prisciano 1 grammatico et librarius aequalis arti grammaticae eius subscribens eum appellat eloquentissimum grammaticum doctorem suum. sane scho- lasticum arguit libellus universus, scilicet hominem qui totum se libris neque iis multis manciparit nec quicquam umquam ipse conspicatus expertusve sit: non indigna tali auctore praecipua admiratio fascium domum professoris pulsare veritorum (c. 1, 122). at de ea re neque quicquam certo sciri potest nec multum interest. Adventus, cuius nominis viro auctor libellum inscripsit, cognomen Advontus. est non frequens et servorum fere (C. I. L. VIII, 3288. 3291. X, 6575) VI 2. V, 436. VI, 10576. VIII, 4609. 8119. vel plebeiorum (1. c. III, 6010, demum saeculo secundo admissum X 7369. XII, 813. XIV, 2714) exeunte inveniuntur eo cognomine tam An- inter senatoria, scilicet usi esse Postumius Aquilinus titulorum listii, nimirum Q. Antistius Adventus consul imperante Marco, Thibilitanorum (C. 1. L. VIII S, 18893. 18906), post gregalem militiam et quam Oclatinii, nempe Oclatinius Adventus a. 218 (Hirschfeld Verw. equestres dignitates factus consul ordinarius libellum olim rettulit Dodwellus (tam gesch. 1, 232). et ad hunc quidem praemissae 71 seq. quam apud Hudsonem geogr. Gr. min. t. II diss. p. lettres. Amstelaedami 1717 p. 37seq.). in eph. hist. crit. de la rep. des quod epislula dedicatoria non so- obstat autem ei similive coniecturae, sed ne viri clarissimi lum dignitatis publicae nullum indicium facit, qua Solinum scripsisse quidem titulum nomini addit, id quod ea aetate, Adventi vocabulum pariter at- veri simile est, omitti non debuit. itaque magis convenit quam florenti, ita que aucloris ipsius ut labenti aetati ad tempora accuratius definienda parum valet. non intellegitur, nisi quod Quo loco libellus scriptus sit, ex ipso emineat, inde conicere possis cum provinciae omnes memorentur, nulla auctorem scripsisse Romae vel certe m ltaba. aetate, qua scripsit Solinus. vixisse eum De soiini Magis refert quaerere de aetate inde apparet, quod class.s - aliquantum ante Theodosium II (401-450) familiam Heidelbergensis duct. sunt ab primae libri ii qui pertinent ad Theodosii invictissimi principis, exemplo scripto studio et diligentia d. n. quod ex scriptoribus aetatis certae, (vide infra p. XCVIII). eodem redit, est, sicut infra XXV) quos Solino usos esse constat, antiquissimus (p. de civitate dei scriptis c. a. 426, videbimus, Augustinus in commentariis laudetGenealogus a. 455. nam cum nomine eum eorum qui extant primus tertium saeculum revocarent, sed Capellam fuerunt quidem nuper, qui ad certa protulerunt et ipsa Sohni neque eius opinationis argumenta satis a quinto demum saeculo adh.biti expilatio auctoris praeterea quod sciamus quinto saeculo Solini liber iam pervulgatus parum ei favet. quare cum Latinarum aevo tam rerum e.us exil.tas fuerit a feliciore autem litterarum quaerendum, utrum saeculo quainsermonis infantia abhorreat, hoc restat quarto. quorum equidem illud praetuler.m. tertio probabilius adscrihatur an 79. non Constantinopol.m Byzantium ibi tantum nominari (c. 1, 10,17), D.ocletianae et neque ullum adesse vestigium provinciarum divisionis opere compilato, tamen suadet Constantinianae, etsi non flagitat, ut in suadet idem praenomen, siqu.dem ut auctor vixerit ante Constantinum. rarescens. christianae rehg.o- vere habuit auctor, quarto saeculo iam referre nulla: nam quam poss.s eo nis praeterea vestigia adsunt VII Gomorr. (c. 35,8 einerescentibus Sodomi et narrationem de pomis invenitur non sohun apud omnino ludaicae, eius notitia iam Ss (h,t. 7. etiam apud dpsum Tac.tum 5 (bell. lud. 4, 8, 4), sed Io ephum fac.t, Latini Solinum a Pnsc.ano ritari ut testem sermonis TZZ similiter il.e aeUeg at illum habeamus: quamquam te ,s "cen m et VegeUum vKe.Hmcu Ulpianum, sed etiam Ammianum „ um quorum e Byzantiis lectttat, et explanat, omnino auctores in scholis Priscianum mterdum se msi- fuisse crediderim, apud Zero Solinum qu antiquiorum et vere recep , inter testimonia auctorum I adm.ttunt, u ad sint, tamen con.uucta vu = omnia licet singula infirma al,a, qu.bus doct. Solinum detrudamus. - Argumen.a i a I nu sunt vere certiora mc c,a ohn. ae.atem definire sibi visi r Graec. 7 geogr 2 nam quod DodweUo (apud Hudsonem suppeditant. esse Hierichunl.s expugnatorem (c. 35 7) in mentem venit Artaxerxem Persarum, contra quem .eUum us nllis regem lUa ^~de H.enchunte cred.b.hs equidem quo pertineat parum Alexander Sol.no Salmasius, hoc scio neque a farrtio non magis cio quam Artaxerxen nlum att.g.sse aetate gesta neque u q"am te ia citari ipsius .u prolegomen loco c. 54, 13 Sahnas.us Pa aestinam. deinde quod ex nominalos esse .taque scribere uondam Parlhos effeci Persas Solinum q Alexandrum, hoc argumentum ne eum aliquantum post Severum Se melionbus l.br.s collat, totum evanuit, postquam pe se satis f.rmum res vertitur, pa«U*m «* est auonaam, in quo tola o abu.um (1 uod apparet Persarum Parthorumque : unde iam oroficisci ab interpolatore usurparat P.iniu. paullo g SS Solinum non aliter usurpare atque Phn.ana 5 s™ Solinus c. 50, 2 referens 6 ) = indicium praebet quod holoser.c.s certe etia.n v.ros ns uti: matronar m vestibus addit nunc (218-222) teste b.og.a- Romanorum usus esse fertur E.agabaK, primus hcet sub- vita Tac. 10; Dio 43, 24 , cf. vita Sev. Alex. 40; pho ( • 26 videantur ne< d.n^serva um , viris antea in usu fuisse , ^cae etiam ne tectum (Tac. ann. 2, 33, D.o 57, 15), senatusconsultum a. p. C. 16 Becker mGalo (Sueton. Gai. 52 ; Dio59,26; es rTca vTri uterentur t.anslat.onem n auctor scribit de ca.nehs post 3 56 his adde quae circi spectacul, trahentibus (c. 49, 11), de peregr a ca facile' morbos si placet, seni.em uorutn (c. 45, 12), deniqne, **V™*™££ causa nemo na ca ur aevi obiurgatiouem, quo exemph a mi.ationem et sui m- habebis sane labent, saecub non minor parentibus suis (c. 1, 90): m- magisque digna Valenan. et Gall.en. t dicia nec dubla nec pauca l.ceat tamen ad cert.ora progred. v,x poribus quam Antoninorum, ut propter ipsam auctoris exilitatem. VIII oiini liber cho- ' Scripsit aiiteni Solinus sub indice Collectaneorum rerum memorabilium rographia. j- nam ] nlnc neq ue a ]j um ullum libello ab eo inscriptum esse infra (p. XCVII) docebitur) chorograpbiani ita comparatam, ut in singulis locis non tam ad utilia et scilu necessaria attenderet quam, ut ipse ait, ad memora- bilia, quo quid significet, exponit satis accurate in praefatione. ordinem locorum sequitur eum, ut primum proponat Europam incipiens ab urbe et Italia cum insulis (c. 1 — 6), post has Graeciam cum Tbessalia Ma- cedonia Thracia insulisque Graecis (c.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Junta De Estudiantes
    t LEAN READ EL TUCSOHENSE" EL TUCSONENSE 10 mat antiguo f mslot periódico El Tucsonsns U dedicated - Con noticias hasta el último tnlnu unity and friendship. The Southwest' oldest and finest Newspaper pub-lishe- i"1 printed In Spanish. Is d fvnr In n n I f I cart v rtm 1 Irt ' LjH Semi Weekly. Anifiirüiia. with articles of Interest Alio Vol. LXIV (11 Tucson, Arizona. Vlern s ; de Muyo íc XXXV - uVO 19"0 Números del Día 5c Atrasados 10c Esta Semana Apela Anael "LA SITUACION ES MAS GRAVE AHORA" B. Serna Ante La Corte PE Suprema De Este País Dice Bradley "Pro-Ang- De Comité el ESTA NOCHE, FIESTA DEL 5 DE MAYO Jefe Nuestra Nuevas del B. Serna" Plana Mayor Mundo Entero Muerto Aquí, En En El Casino Washington, D. C. Mayo 3 El General Omar N. Brad- Accidente de Junta de Ballroom, Todos ley, Jefe Militar de Estados IOWr ISABEL, TEXAS Estudiantes Unidos urgió ayer al Congre Mexico detuvo a o barcos Trafico Invitados! so Nacional que exLienda la de pesca americana, alegando ley de servicio selectivo obli- - que estaban pescando en Ayer jueves, un Jurado Kn dos ediciones anteriores gatorio, contra la amenaza due- Menor, ai practicar la autop- Periodismo, publicamos el programa de de ataques de armados de aguas territoriales. Los Mañana Rusia ños ue los narcos uiceu que Ii sia del caüáver del Sargento m la Fiesta del 5 de Mayo en y dijo, que la expansion rusa esiauan pescanao a UU nan- de Estado Mayor de Aviavion Tucson, que tendrá lugar esta ha creado "una muy mala Wallin, 26 En En en Casino as ue ia cosía.
    [Show full text]
  • Map 86 Paphlagonia Compiled by C
    Map 86 Paphlagonia Compiled by C. Foss, 1995 Introduction The map comprises ancient Paphlagonia, and extends into eastern Bithynia and the northernmost part of Galatia. Evidence for the ancient topography is most abundant on the coast, along the Roman roads, and in Galatia. Arrian’s Periplus Ponti Euxini (written c. A.D. 132), together with an earlier text by Menippus (c. 20 B.C.) and a related Late Antique anonymous work, describe the coast in great detail. Most of the sites named in these works can be located at least approximately, although a few resist identification; Müller’s commentary in GGM I remains valuable. For the Roman roads, ItMiller is uncritical; French (1981) is far more useful, but treats only one major road. The roads of Paphlagonia are presented in admirable detail by TIB Paphlagonien, those of northern Galatia likewise by TIB Galatien. The interior of Paphlagonia is a remote, mountainous country, cut off from the regions to the south by long, parallel ranges. Communication east and west is relatively easy; north and south, it is much more difficult. The country contains a few long, wide plains and river valleys, some of considerable fertility. In antiquity, the mountains were heavily forested. For the most part, the region was never densely populated. For a general description, see Leonhard (1915); and for an excellent account of some areas (including eastern Bithynia), with discussion of specific problems, note Robert (1980). RE Paphlagonia gives a full list of all named sites (cols. 2537-50) and of physical remains (2498-2510, 2515). Some features listed there do not appear on the map because of limited significance or uncertainty of dating.
    [Show full text]
  • Victor Parker University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
    ELECTRUM * Vol. 25 (2018): 187–208 doi: 10.4467/20800909EL.18.009.8929 www.ejournals.eu/electrum DEIOTARUS: ZUR KARRIERE EINES RÖMISCHEN KLIENTELKÖNIGS* Victor Parker University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand Abstract: The article traces the see-sawing fortunes of the Galatian ruler Deiotarus, how he gained and lost and regained control over various territories (the three Galatian tetrarchies; Lesser Armenia; and an unnamed coastal strip of land between Galatia and Lesser Armenia) from 63 BC until his death in ca. 40 BC. It also examines Cicero’s rhetorical strategy in his speech in Deio- tarus’ defence before Caesar and argues that much in the speech cannot be taken at face value – many remarks of Cicero’s about Deiotarus are two-edged and should not be used uncritically in reconstructing Deiotarus’ career. Key words: Deiotarus, Galatia, Cicero, Caesar, Roman-Galatian relations. Aus verschiedenen Überlegungen heraus ernannten oder duldeten die Römer eine An- zahl formal unabhängiger Könige in Territorien, in denen ungeachtet der jeweiligen rechtlichen Situation Rom in Wirklichkeit das Wort führte. Man hat sich daran gewöhnt, von Klientelkönigen zu reden. Oft genug sind diese Klientelkönige für uns kaum mehr als bloße Namen, denn historisch wichtig waren sie nicht. Als sich ihrer sechs in den frü- hen 40er Jahren n.Chr. in dem palästinischen Städtchen Tiberias trafen – Antiochus IV. von Kommagene, Sampsigeramus von Emesa, Kotys von Kleinarmenien, Polemon II. von Pontos, Herodes von Chalkis im Libanon und Herodes Agrippa I. von Judäa – wußte der Statthalter Syriens, C. Vibius Marsus, wie mit ihnen umzugehen war. Er befahl ihnen, unverzüglich ihrer Wege zu gehen, denn mit solchen Spielchen hatte er wenig Geduld; und die folgsamen Klientelkönige taten brav, wie ihnen geheißen (Jos.
    [Show full text]
  • Intercultural Anthroponomy in Hellenistic and Roman Galatia with Maps Drafted by Michael Grün and April Ross
    GEPHYRA 9 2012 51–68 Altay COŞKUN Intercultural anthroponomy in Hellenistic and Roman Galatia with maps drafted by Michael Grün and April Ross Abstract: From 278 BC, Celtic mercenaries started to be involved in the dynastic wars of Asia Mi- nor and began to settle in eastern Phrygia as ‘Galatians’. From there they ruled substantial parts of central and western Anatolia until the creation of the Roman province of Galatia in 25 BC. De- spite their historical importance, little is known about their cultural identity, so that a closer look at their personal names helps to fill some of the gaps in our knowledge. After a general intro- duction to the onomastic resources for central Anatolia, it is pointed out that Celtic compound names dominated among the aristocracy of Hellenistic Galatia. Prosopographical information is then employed to explain that the rare use of foreign names in the course of the 1st century BC was mainly due to intermarriage with the nobility of neighbouring territories. Despite the growing im- pact of Hellenization and Romanization in the same period, Greek and Roman personal names be- came more popular than Celtic names only in the latter half of the 1st century AD, though Celtic names only disappear in the course of the 3rd century. Surprising is the resurgence of Phrygian names in imperial inscriptions, which may at least partly be explained by the amalgamation of the priestly elite of Pessinus and the Tolistobogian nobility. But in some places, there seems to have been a continuity of Phrygian settlement that may go back to the early Hellenistic period if not beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology of the Galatians at Ancyra from the Hellenistic Period Through the Roman Era
    ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE GALATIANS AT ANCYRA FROM THE HELLENISTIC PERIOD THROUGH THE ROMAN ERA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF THE MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY DERYA ULUSOY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN DEPARTMENT OF SETTLEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY JULY 2006 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Sencer AYATA Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Dr. Numan TUNA Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Asst. Prof. Dr. D. Burcu ERCİYAS Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Vedat TOPRAK (METU, GEOE) Asst. Prof. Dr. D. Burcu ERC İYAS (METU, SA) Dr. Çi ğdem ATAKUMAN (METU, STM) ii I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name :DERYA ULUSOY Signature : iii ABSTRACT ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE GALATIANS AT ANCYRA FROM THE HELLENISTIC PERIOD THROUGH THE ROMAN ERA Ulusoy, Derya M.S., Department of Settlement Archaeology Supervisor: Asst. Prof. Dr. D. Burcu ERC İYAS July 2006, 118 pages Galatians who entered into Anatolia in about 280 B.C., in order to help the Bithynian king Nicomedes I against his brother Zipoetas, had a significant role in the history of the ancient Asia Minor.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stratagems, and the Aqueducts of Rome, with an English Translation
    Jyau'M ^«voi Presented to the LIBRARIES of the UMVERSITY OF TORONTTO by MARGARET PHILLIPS THE LOEB CLASSICAL LIBRARY p:j)iTKn UY E. CAPPS, PH.D., LL.D. 1', E. PAGE, mtt.d. \V. H. D. ROUSE. LiTT.i). FRONTIXUS FRONTINUS THE STRATAGEMS AXl) THE AQUEDUCTS OF ROME WITH AN ENGLISH TRANSLATION P.V CHARLES E. BENNETT I.ATK GOI.DWltJ SMITH PROFESSOR OF LATIN IS CORNELL UNIVERSITY TlIK TliA.VSLATION OF THE AQUEDUCTS BEING A REVISION OF THAT OF CLEMENS HERSCHEL EDITED AND PREPARED FOR THE PRESS BV MARY B. M(ELWAIN PROFESSOR OF LATIK IN SMITH COLLEGE LONDON : W1LLL\M HEINEMANN NEW YORK : G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS MCMXXV Printed in Great Britain PREFACE Befoke his death in May 1921, Professor Bennett had finished the draft of his translation of the Strategemala and of liis revision of Clemens Herschel's transhition of the De Aquia. He had also, through various footnotes, indicated clearly his attitude toward the texts he had adopted as the basis for his trans- lation. For the editorial revision of the versions, the introductory material, the index, many of the footnotes and the general matters of typography, the responsibility should rest with the undersigned. The references to the sources of the Strategemala have been selected for the most part from those cited in Gundermann's conspectus locoriim. The translation of the Sfrafegemata is based upon Gundermann's text, Leipzig, 1888, with ver\' few changes, which are indicated in the footnotes. The brackets indicating glosses or conjectures have been omitted for the sake of appearance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeological. Record of the Galatians in Anatolia
    THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL. RECORD OF THE GALATIANS IN ANATOLIA, 278-63 B..C. by Lucia Frances Nixon A.B., Bryn Maw College, 1971 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR -THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of Classics s, We accept this thesis as;conforming to the required standard THE..UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA August, 1977 © Lucia Frances Nixon, 1977 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of . Glassies The University of British Columbia 2075 Wesbrook Place Vancouver, Canada V6T 1W5 Date pphmary 3fir 1 Q7ft ii ABSTRACT The Galatians were a group of Celts who arrived in Anatolia from the west in 278 B.C. According to the historical sources, they earned their livelihood by plundering and by serving as mercenaries in the eastern Medit• erranean. Ancient authors state that the Galatians constituted a definite threat to the cities of western Asia Minor before they were settled in central Anatolia. Galatia became a Roman province in 25 B.C.; by that time, the Galatians had been thoroughly absorbed by the local population. The purpose of this paper is to see what archaeological evidence exists for the presence of the Galatians in Anatolia during the pre-provincial per• iod, and how that evidence can be obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annexation of Galatia Reviewed
    ADALYA 22, 2019 The Annexation of Galatia Reviewed Julian BENNETT* Abstract Öz This article reconsiders the accepted views Bu makalede, Galatia’nın ilhakı ve “eyaletleş- on the annexation and ‘provincialisation’ of mesi” hususunda kabul edilegelmiş görüşler Galatia by expanding on the military-related askeri ilintili etkenler de dahil edilerek tekrar factors involved. It is argued that the annexa- mercek altına alınmaktadır. İlhak ile insangücü tion helped provide Rome with the necessary de dahil olmak üzere Roma’ya Augustus’un resources, including manpower, to maintain MÖ 30 ile 25 arasında kurduğu ‘Yeni Model’ Augustus’ ‘New Model’ Army as established be- ordusunu sürdürmek için gereken kaynakla- tween 30 and 25 BC, as well as providing land rın temin edildiği ve lejyoner veteranların ileri for the future discharge of legionary veterans. tarihte terhisleri için toprak sağladığı öne sü- The achievements of the known governors of rülmektedir. MÖ 25 ila MS 14 yılları arasında Galatia for 25 BC-AD 14 are reviewed also, Galatia valiliği yaptıkları bilinen şahısların işleri noting how their senatorial status as pro-prae- de gözden geçirilmekte ve komuta ettikleri gar- tor or pro-consul had no bearing on the type nizon türü üzerinde pro-praetor veya pro-con- of garrison they commanded. The process of sul olarak senatoryal statülerinin bir önemi ol- establishing the Augustan coloniae ‘in Pisidia’ madığına dikkat çekilmektedir. Bundan sonra is then re-examined, as is the evidence for the Pisidia’da Augustus colonia’larının kurulması character of Ancyra, Pessinus, and Tavium in süreci ve de ilhakın öncesi ve hemen sonrasın- the pre- and immediate post-annexation pe- da Ankyra, Pessinos ve Tavion’un karakteri için riod.
    [Show full text]
  • Indirici Bir Gelişme Olarak Vurgulamak Istiyorum
    , ..·.. ;. Antikçağ Ancİdolusu'.n�::._. : Savaşçı �avmi GALATLAR Antikçağ Anadolusu' nun Savaşçı Kavmi GALATLAR Murat ARSLAN T ARKEOLOJİ VE SANAT YAYINLARI ARKEOLOJİ VE SANAT YAYINLARI Deneme, Eleştiri ve Tarih Dizisi: 23 Murat Arslan Antikçağ Anadolusu'nun Savaşçı Kavmi GALATLAR Yayınlayan ve Yöneten Nezih BAŞGELEN Kapak Düzeni GÜNÜBEK Cem Baskı Kanaat Matbaası 2000,İ stanbul ISBN: 975-6899-62-X Her türlü yayın hakkı saklıdır. © 2000Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınlan Hayriye Cad. Çorlu Apt. 3/4, Galatasaray, 80060, İstanbul Tel.: Fax: O 212 293 03 78 - 245 6838 O 212 245 68 77 e-mail: [email protected] www.arkeolojisanat.com İÇİNDEKİLER SUN UŞ........................................................................................................................................ IX ÖNSÖ Z ....................................................................................................................................... XVII GİRİ Ş................ ........................................................................................................................... A. KeltDü nya sına Genel Bak ış ......................................................................... B. Ga latlar la İlgiliAn tik Kaynak lar ın veMod em Literatürün Du rumu ......................................................................................................................... 12 I. SİYA SA L GE Lİ ŞM ELER ........................................................................... ....... ... 31 A. İsk en der' in Ölümünd en So nra General leriAra
    [Show full text]
  • University of Cincinnati
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date: 7-Jul-2010 I, Shannan M. Stewart , hereby submit this original work as part of the requirements for the degree of: Doctor of Philosophy in Classics It is entitled: Gordion After the Knot: Hellenistic Pottery and Culture Student Signature: Shannan M. Stewart This work and its defense approved by: Committee Chair: Kathleen Lynch, PhD Kathleen Lynch, PhD 8/23/2010 1,077 Gordion After the Knot: Hellenistic Pottery and Culture A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy in the Department of Classics of the College of Arts and Sciences by Shannan Marie Stewart July, 2010 B.A. University of Minnesota, 2001 M.A. University of Wisconsin, 2003 Committee Chair: Kathleen M. Lynch, Ph.D. Abstract The archaeological site of Gordion is located in central Anatolia, near the confluence of the Sakarya and Porsuk Rivers. Settlement at the site extended from the Early Bronze Age (third millennium B.C.E.) through the Hellenistic period (late fourth through early second centuries B.C.E.). Gordion is perhaps best known for its most famous king Midas, who ruled the Phrygian Empire in the late eighth century B.C.E., and for its most famous visitor, Alexander the Great, who cut the Gordian Knot in 333 B.C.E. Through the success of his military campaigns, Alexander established an empire stretching from Greece to the Himalayas and inaugurated a new cultural and historical era, the Hellenistic period. The material culture of Hellenistic Anatolia has received only limited attention from researchers, leaving a vast lacuna in our view of the Hellenistic world, which this dissertation begins to emend by documenting and analyzing the Hellenistic pottery recovered during the Rodney S.
    [Show full text]
  • Theceltsintheeast
    Voronino z Lugii–Trocmi cemetery D Celtic names and La Tène material zTrostjantitsa in Anatolia, the eastern Balkans, zD and the Pontic Steppes Velemichi I Az Mokhovo Az Goroshkov La Tène jewellery z Middle La Tène cemetery J Burial outside the Celtic Late La Tène oppidum _ area with La Tène finds D Galatian barrows Zalesye Fortified site outside the Celtic D area with La Tène finds Place-name in -dunum D z A B Other La Tène finds B Place-name in -briga R La Tène D horsebits Place-name in duro- (knebeltrensen) £ Place-name in -nemeton N LUGII Battles and raids involving Galatians (Galatae/Galli) > Approximate boundaries £ of Trocmi, Tectosages, and B La Tène pottery zDubljany £ Tolistobogii B Chariot burial Galatia under Deiotaros D B Galatian fortified site G 63–40 BC Pekaryz B B B z £ £ B Melnikovka Dz Pirogovo COTINI cemetery Lipljava D z B A £ B £ JIzkovce Zemplín_ £ B Bodroghalom J Galis- B A OSI _Lovocka Rud'z z D?Karrodunon[LU] £ Malaja Sakharna A ANARTI--- z Ciumesti¸ D Foeni Sanislau JJ J Dindesti¸ Piscolt¸ JJJ B J Valaea Iui Mihai A A B Curtuiuseni¸ D A ce J JCepari IA Ghiris¸ Tarian COSTOBOCI H TEURISCI --- T Y z Dabîca JGalatii¸ Bistritei C Marjevka J J J Dipsa¸ A> ApahidaJ J S A Olbia £A J Fîntînele Bandul de Cimpie z c. 200 BC Dezmir BASTARNAEKalfa A JPapiu-Ilarian£ JAiud Cristurul Secuiesc Silivas¸J JBratei J z nr. Nikolskoe Seica¸ Mica D MAEOTIS Toarcla Sea of Azov A Britolagai zPoiana BRITOLAGAI _Luncani E B pSarmizegetusa Kerch Tyrambe BlAliobrix Panticapaeum A z Zidovar A z SARMATIA _ DlNoviodunum zPhanagoria Neapolis£
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerio. Del Ejercito
    ~\ /. A110 LXXI.-Núm. M1 \; Domingo, 23 de octubre de 1960 ,~ Tomo N.-Pág. 305 . {, 1> ........, / DEL. MINISTERIO. DEL EJERCITO naaho.· Angel Fernñndez Abad, Alber­ Brigada. de Infantería D. Manuel ORDENES to Hernáridez SUárez, José Algara. candelas Segura, para. Sil hijo don Rulz. Manuel L6pez 'I;ópez. Francis· Luis Manuel Candt.las Dedo. co Dom!n8l1ez PéJlez, Alejo Ca.lles Brigada. de Infanter!!). 1>. CI?S~N!O ~anueco . Carlos Herrero Gonzáli!Z y Moreno Moreno, para. Sil hijo don Felipe T<lste U6n!áíez, y non-la. losé Luis Moreno Vicario. PI~1,tÓ!l~~4111~,,_de ..SlI.U. :Francisco del Brigada de Infantería. D. Abllio Ou. Risca .tcanar~)" D1~go Espinosa. t1érrez F~mández, pera. su hijo don !ula"rlguez. ' .. ¡uUán Gutlérrez Manjón. Madl'ld, 7 de octuboo de 1960. Sargento de Artlll~r1a D. ' Luclnno i · González Moral, para. su hiJo don BARROSO losó Lula González Romo. CUERPO ECLESIASTICO Suboficial especialista. D. Angel ________.. I ••• +~I.!I'.. ------ -- Mansllle. Pa.la..clos, pat18. su hijo don , DEL EJERCITO Félix Mansilla Alonso. Brigada especlal1sta D. Vrctor Ca.­ llistfntivos listado Mayor Central rrera. PInedo. para Sil hijo· D. ¡esús María. Carrera. Be.rrto. Se eonce<le el d1&tintivo de Pro­ dll Ej'rdf~ Brigada. d.e In!anter1&. D~ Francisco Ieeor&4o, cl'eado por Decreto de 2i Htlrrero Guerra, para su hiJa dofia. de marzo de 1915 (.. C. L... núm. 28), MarIa SOladad H~rrero Femández. Orden ctrClll/lr do 2f' de mayo de lU31 Brigada de Infanterla D. LuIs Ca.­ :·C. L.. núm. 279) y Ordel\ comunl­ mare.ro <la.mIa, ·para.
    [Show full text]