DOCSLIB.ORG

Multinational

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Multinational AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FUND MULTINATIONAL A SUB-REGIONAL HIV/AIDS PROGRAMME FOR THE REFUGEES, INTERNALLY DISPLACED POPULATION AND THEIR HOST COMMUNITIES IN THE MANO RIVER UNION BASIN COUNTRIES AND CÔTE D’IVOIRE APPRAISAL REPORT SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OCSD CENTRAL AND WEST REGIONS JULY 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET, CURRENCY AND MEASURES, LISTS OF TABLES, LIST OF ANNEXES, LIST OF ABREVIATIONS, BASIC DATA SHEET, PROJECT LOGICAL FRAMEWORK AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i-ix 1. PROJECT ORIGIN AND BACKGROUND....................................................................1 1.1 Origin and History of the Project……………………………………………………1 2. THE MANO RIVER UNION ..........................................................................................2 2.1 An overview...............………………………………………………………………2 2.2 The Status of the HIV/AIDS Epidemic in the Sub-Region ........................................3 2.3 MRU Governments’ Sector Policies and Strategies ..................................................5 2.4 Institutional Framework of STI/HIV/AIDS Control..................................................5 2.5 Health Systems in the Mano River Basin Countries..................................................6 2.6 Interventions of Development Partners in STI/HIV/AIDS control ...........................7 2.7 Challenges and Constraints........................................................................................8 3. THE PROGRAMME......................................................................................................10 4. THE PROJECT...............................................................................................................11 4.1 Project Concept and Rationale................................................................................11 4.2 Project Area and Beneficiaries.................................................................................13 4.3 Strategic Context......................................................................................................14 4.4 Project Objective......................................................................................................15 4.5 Project Description...................................................................................................15 4.6 Environmental Impact..............................................................................................18 4.7 Project Costs............................................................................................................18 4.8 Sources of Finance and Expenditure Schedule........................................................19 5. PROJECT EXECUTION................................................................................................21 5.1 Executing Agency....................................................................................................21 5.2 Institutional Arrangements.......................................................................................21 5.3 Implementation Schedule.........................................................................................24 5.4 Procurement Arrangements .....................................................................................24 5.5 Disbursements arrangements ...................................................................................27 5.6 Monitoring and Evaluation......................................................................................27 5.7 Financial and Audit Reports ....................................................................................28 5.8 Aid Co-ordination....................................................................................................28 6. PROJECT SUSTAINABILITY AND RISKS................................................................29 6.1 Recurrent Expenses..................................................................................................29 6.2 Project Sustainability ...............................................................................................29 6.3 Key Risks and Mitigation Measures........................................................................30 7. PROJECT BENEFITS....................................................................................................30 7.1 Economic Impact.....................................................................................................30 7.2 Impact on Gender.....................................................................................................30 7.3 Impact on Poverty Reduction...................................................................................31 TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont’d) 8. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS...........................................................31 8.1 Conclusion ...............................................................................................................31 8.2 Recommendations and Conditions ..........................................................................32 This report is based on the findings of a Joint ADB/UNAIDS/Mano River Union Secretariat mission that visited the Mano River Union Countries and Cote D’Ivoire from 21 March to 01 April 2004. The ADB mission comprised Pap J. Williams, Principal Health Specialist and Team Leader (OCSD.1), Ms. A. Amine, Principal Social Sector Specialist (HIV/AIDS Focal Person) POPR.1 and a Consultant Costing Specialist. Inquiries should be addressed to Mr. M. YOUSSOUF, Manager, OCSD.1, Ext. 2110 or Ms. Z. El Bakri, Director, OCSD, Ext. 2045. i AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FUND HEADQUARTERS TEMPORARY RELOCATION AGENCY 01 BP 1387, ABIDJAN 01 BP 3236 - 1002 TUNIS Belvedere Côte d’Ivoire Tunisia Tel.: (225) 20 20 44 44 Tel: (216) 71 333 511 Fax: (225) 20 21 77 53 Fax: (216) 71 351 933 PROJECT INFORMATION Date: April 2004 The information given hereunder is intended to provide some guidance to prospective suppliers, contractors, consultants and all persons interested in the procurement of goods and services for projects approved by the Boards of Directors of the Bank Group. More detailed information may be obtained from the Executing Agency of the Recipient. 1. COUNTRIES: Republic of Sierra Leone Republic of Guinea Republic of Liberia Republic of Côte D’Ivoire 2. NAME OF PROJECT: ADF financed Project in support of A Sub Regional HIV/AIDS Programme For the Refugees, Internally Displaced Population And Their Host Communities in the Mano River Basin Countries And Côte D’Ivoire 3. GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION: Danane (Côte D’Ivoire), Nimba (Liberia), Gueckedou (Guinea) and Kenema (Sierra Leone). 4. BENEFICIARIES: Refugees, Internally Displaced Populations and their host communities in Mano River Basin Countries and Western Côte D’Ivoire 5. EXECUTING AGENCY: Executive Secretariat of the Mano River Delco House, 12 Ligthfoot Boston Street, PM Box: 133; Freetown, Sierra Leone. Tel: 232-226-883 Fax : 223-226-883 Email:[email protected] 6. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project will support three components: (i) Strengthening of HIV/AIDS/STI prevention, control and treatment; (ii) Promotion of Multi-Sectoral and Sub-Regional Co-ordination of HIV/AIDS/STI activities; and (iii) Project Management. ii 7. TOTAL PROGRAMME COST : UA 22.82 million i) Foreign Exchange : UA 15.06 million ii) Local Currency : UA 7.76 million 8. BANK GROUP’S SUPPORT ADF Grant : UA 5.00 million 9. OTHER SOURCES OF FINANCE: Global Fund : UA 17.56 million Governments : UA 0.26 million 10. APPROVAL DATE : 2nd quarter 2004 11. ESTIMATED START-UP DATE January 2005 AND DURATION : 3 years 12. PROCUREMENT OF GOODS, WORKS AND SERVICES: Goods: Direct procurement of quality controlled and timely delivery of basic equipment, medical and pharmaceutical consumables at the lowest available prices from UNIPAC. Works: National competitive bidding: for the rehabilitation and/or construction of Voluntary Counselling Centres (VTCs). Services: Direct negotiations: with United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) for technical assistance in the administrative, technical and financial management of the project and also with UNIPAC for the procurement of medical equipment and supplies. Shortlist: for the recruitment for the auditing firm for auditing project accounts and reputable local NGOs and CBOs for local training in HIV/AIDS prevention, control and treatment; (ii) the harmonisation of the training modules; and (iii) the preparation of IEC/BCC materials and messages; and iv) coordination and consolidation of information on the implementation of country level activities. National competitive bidding: contracting for the rehabilitation/construction of Voluntary Counselling and Testing (VCTs) centres. iii CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (March 2004) UA 1 = US$ 1.4807 WEIGHTS AND MEASURES Metric System FISCAL YEAR From 1 January to 31 December LIST OF TABLES Page 2.1 A summary of Major Development Partners in STIs/HIV/AIDS Control In the MRU Countries and Côte d’Ivoire (2004) 8 3.1 MRU HIV/AIDS Programme Costs by Source of Finance and Currency Type 11 4.1 Summary of ABF Project Costs by Component 18 4.2 Project Costs by Category of Expenditure 19 4.3 ADF Project Costs by Source of Finance 19 4.4 Project Costs by Source of Finance and by Category of Expenditure 20 4.5 Expenditure Schedule by Category of Expenditure 20 4.6 Expenditure Schedule by Source of Financing 20 5.1 Project Implementation Schedule 24 5.2 Provisions for the Procurement of Goods and Services 25 LIST OF ANNEXES NNo.o. ooff ppagesages Annex 1 Map of Project Sites 1 Annex II Detailed Project Costs by Component 5 Annex III Provisional
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Profile of Internal Displacement : Sierra Leone
    PROFILE OF INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT : SIERRA LEONE Compilation of the information available in the Global IDP Database of the Norwegian Refugee Council (as of 15 October, 2003) Also available at http://www.idpproject.org Users of this document are welcome to credit the Global IDP Database for the collection of information. The opinions expressed here are those of the sources and are not necessarily shared by the Global IDP Project or NRC Norwegian Refugee Council/Global IDP Project Chemin Moïse Duboule, 59 1209 Geneva - Switzerland Tel: + 41 22 799 07 00 Fax: + 41 22 799 07 01 E-mail : [email protected] CONTENTS CONTENTS 1 PROFILE SUMMARY 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 CAUSES AND BACKGROUND OF DISPLACEMENT 9 BACKGROUND TO THE CONFLICT 9 CHRONOLOGY OF SIGNIFICANT EVENTS SINCE INDEPENDENCE (1961 - 2000) 9 HISTORICAL OUTLINE OF THE FIRST EIGHT YEARS OF CONFLICT (1991-1998) 13 CONTINUED CONFLICT DESPITE THE SIGNING OF THE LOME PEACE AGREEMENT (JULY 1999-MAY 2000) 16 PEACE PROCESS DERAILED AS SECURITY SITUATION WORSENED DRAMATICALLY IN MAY 2000 18 RELATIVELY STABLE SECURITY SITUATION SINCE SIGNING OF CEASE-FIRE AGREEMENT IN ABUJA ON 10 NOVEMBER 2000 20 CIVIL WAR DECLARED OVER FOLLOWING THE FULL DEPLOYMENT OF UNAMSIL AND THE COMPLETION OF DISARMAMENT (JANUARY 2002) 22 REGIONAL EFFORTS TO MAINTAIN PEACE IN SIERRA LEONE (2002) 23 SIERRA LEONEANS GO TO THE POLLS TO RE-ELECT AHMAD TEJAN KABBAH AS PRESIDENT (MAY 2002) 24 SIERRA LEONE’S SPECIAL COURT AND TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION START WORK (2002-2003) 25 MAIN CAUSES OF DISPLACEMENT 28 COUNTRYWIDE DISPLACEMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Productive and Decent Work for Youth in the Mano River Union: Guinea
    UNIDO AFRICAN UNION YEN UNOWA Productive and Decent Work for Youth in the Mano River Union: Guinea, Liberia, Sierra Leone and in Côte d’Ivoire 4.5 million youth need employment: An agenda for a multi-stakeholder programme ISSUES PAPER February 2007 CONTENTS Introduction I. Youth Employment - a stimulus to peace and economic stability II. What has been achieved? • Job creation for youth: Past and on-going efforts by Governments and various stakeholders • Gaps and missing links III. The Way Ahead • Balancing demand and supply • Exploring new productive opportunities • Best practices IV. Funding Mechanisms Annexes a. Youth unemployment rates in MRU and Côte d’Ivoire b. Policy initiatives: - Inclusion of youth employment in PRSPs/budgets - Inclusion of youth in national employment policies and other initiatives c. Examples of youth-targeted programmes to increase demand for labour d. Examples of youth-targeted programmes to improve the supply of labour e. Proposed initiatives in the Mano River Union and in Côte d’Ivoire Introduction This Issues Paper is intended to guide the discussions at the UNIDO/African Union (AU) High-Level Consultative Meeting, organized in cooperation with The United Nations Office for West Africa (UNOWA), and the United Nations Secretary-General’s Youth Employment Network (YEN) on Productive and Decent Work for Youth, in the countries of the Mano River Union (MRU): Sierra Leone, Liberia, Guinea, and in Côte d’Ivoire. The Issues Paper: Addresses the urgent need to create employment for 4.5 million youth aged between
    [Show full text]
  • The Meaning of a Militia: Understanding the Civil Defence Forces of Sierra Leone
    African Affairs, 106/425, 639–662 doi: 10.1093/afraf/adm054 C The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal African Society. All rights reserved ! THE MEANING OF A MILITIA: UNDERSTANDING THE CIVIL DEFENCE FORCES OF SIERRA LEONE DANNY HOFFMAN ABSTRACT This article is an adapted, narrative version of an expert witness report the author wrote for the Defence of one of the accused before the Spe- cial Court for Sierra Leone. The case against the Civil Defence Forces militia was predicated in part on the argument that the CDF was a mil- itary organization with military-style command and control. Based on a close reading of the Prosecution’s military expert witness report and the author’s ethnographic research with the militia, the article outlines a case for understanding the CDF as the militarization of a social network rather than as a military organization. This framing has implications not only for post-conflict adjudication, but for how we think about and intervene in violent contexts throughout contemporary West Africa. ON 14 JUNE 2005 COLONEL RICHARD IRON TOOK THE WITNESS STAND in the case against the Civil Defence Forces at the Special Court for Sierra Leone. The Court was trying those accused of bearing ‘greatest responsi- bility for serious violations of humanitarian law and Sierra Leonean law’ during the latter half of the country’s ten-year war. Iron, a British officer, was in Freetown to answer the Defence’s challenge to a report he wrote on behalf of the Prosecution. Iron’s report did not speak directly to the ultimate issue, the Court’s terminology for the guilt or innocence of the accused.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mano River Union Trade Facilitation Study
    REQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST (CONSULTING SERVICES) AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK NEPAD, REGIONAL INTEGRATION AND TRADE DEPARTMENT ATR B, 5th Floor 13 Avenue de Ghana, B.P. 323 - 1002 Tunis-Belvédère, Tunisia The Mano River Union Trade Facilitation Study The African Development Bank invites Consultants to express their interest in undertaking a Trade Facilitation Needs Assessment Study for the Mano River Union (MRU). The services included under this assignment are: A review of relevant background materials on the MRU, including the Treaty and its Protocols that define the legal framework, principles and polices for intra-union trade; A review of state of trade and integration in the MRU; the trends, patterns of trade flows, including informal trade; Identification trade policy handicaps, including human; institutional; non-tariff barriers that hinder movements of goods, services and persons - Rules of Origin, Customs Procedures, Technical Barriers, Regulations and administrative measures etc. A review of relevant trade facilitation regulations; Assessment of critical trade facilitation needs, especially in the areas of transport and transit corridor facilitation, border operations and management, legal issues associated with transit border management; customs procedures, systems connectivity and automation, the legal/regulatory frameworks, This should also be linked to the new concept of the MRU growth triangle programme; Assessment of and situate the MRU roles in the overall trade policy and trade facilitation process vis-à-vis
    [Show full text]
  • Final Declaration of the Sub-Regional Meeting on Lassa Fever Control in the Mano River Union Countries, Freetown, Sierra Leone, 13-14 September 2004
    Final Declaration of the Sub-Regional Meeting on Lassa Fever Control in the Mano River Union Countries, Freetown, Sierra Leone, 13-14 September 2004 The Ministers of Health of the Mano River Union Countries, namely, Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone, held a meeting in Freetown on 13-14 September 2004 with the goal to adopt a joint Sub-Regional strategy for Lassa fever control in the MRU countries, 2004-2008. The Ministers of Health of the Mano River Union Countries: Alarmed by the continued endemic and epidemic transmission of Lassa virus in the Sub-Region Concerned about the recent epidemics in Sierra Leone and Liberia Recognising the need to protect 58 million population potentially at risk of contracting Lassavirus infection in West Africa The Ministers of Health of the Mano River Union Countries adopt the following Declaration on Lassa fever prevention and control in the Mano River Union Countries and commit themselves as follows: 1. Implement the adopted “Sub-Regional Strategic Plan of Action for Lassa Fever Prevention and Control, 2004-2008.” 2. Convene annual Sub-Regional meetings, to be rotated among MRU and other interested countries. 3. Encourage the inclusion of additional, potentially affected countries. 4. Convene periodic meetings of the technical groups to address specific issues The Parties will jointly pursue the following objectives: 5. Among others, the technical groups will collaborate on the following issues: a. Exchange of scientific information and materials. b. Address cross-cutting activities 6. Collaboration in the area of patient management, namely— a. Adopt a standardised clinical case definition b. Common treatment guidelines c.
    [Show full text]
  • Guinea Côte D'ivoire Liberia
    Mount Nimba Ecosystem Roger W. Luke and Saye Thompson [email protected] +231777397418/+231886576131 and +2317770242935 Liberia, Ivory Coast and Guinea Size: Total 3 countries: 29,093 ha (290,93 km2) Guinea: 12,540 ha, Côte d'Ivoire: 5,000 ha, and Liberia: 11,553 hectares Côte d'Ivoire Guinea Liberia Page 1 of 5 Participants in coordinating the ongoing transboundary cooperation: National Government: • Liberian (Forestry Development Authority (FDA)) • Guinean (CEGENS) • Ivorian Government Local Government: • Nimba County Protected area administration: • East Nimba Nature Reserve Management (ENNR) • ENNR Co-management Committee International NGOs: • Conservation International • Fauna and Flora International National NGOs: • East Nimba Nature Reserve Co-management Committee (CMC) • Skills and Agriculture Development Services (SADS) • Rural Integrated Center for Community Empowerment (RICCE) Local NGOs: • Agriculture Relief Services (ARS) Intergovernmental organizations: • Mano River Union (MRU) Multi-National Corporations: • United National Development Program (UNDP) Community-based Organizations: • Gbalay-geh Youth Association Objectives: The Transboundary Collaboration is characterized by a composition of natural ecosystems evolving from several ecological and geo- physical processes that have obtained to the creation of many habitat types such as montane gallery forest, secondary thickets, or woody grass land, secondary hill forests, moist evergreen forest, swamp or wetter secondary forests. As a result of the diverse vegetative uniqueness of the site, accommodation is provided for many species of conservation relevance including the endemic Nimba Toad, endangered Nimba Otter Shrew, and African Swallow-tail butterfly; socially the area main habitants are the Mano and the Gio. Despite of the three countries they have the same culture and are intermarriage. Very common and spongy borders and conduct their local trade by frequent crossing and transacting their economic activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy & Practice Brief
    ISSUE # 006 Policy & Practice Brief May Knowledge for durable peace 2011 A REGIONAL APPROACH TO PEACEBUILDING - THE MANO RIVER REGION1 Dorcas Ettang, Grace Maina and Warigia Razia “Contemporary conflict creates a web of interlocking conflicts involving the transfer of populations, arms, armies, finances, and conflict goods across increasingly porous borders”2 UN Cartographi THE MANO RIVER REGION Nouakchott The boundaries and names shown and the designations MAURITANIA used on this map do not imply official endorsement or Sen Rosso ega Tombouctou acceptance by the United Nations. l 'Ayoûn C Kaédi el 'Atroûs� Néma Se Gao Saint-Louis C tio NIGER N Thiès Tahoua CHAD Departme Diourbel Dakar Kaolack SENEGAL Kayes MALI Zinder Diffa Gambia Tambacounda Niamey GAMBIA Maradi Lake r ige Dosso Banjul N Chad N Ziguinchor Bamako BURKINA FASO Niger t of Ouagadougou Birnin Kebbi Kano Maiduguri Bissau F Potiskum iel GUINEA- Dabola D BISSAU Sikasso Boke Bobo-Dioulasso S Kaduna U G U INEA pport BENIN Gombe Kindia Kankan e Djougou nu A NIGERIA e Conakry B Volta Abuja T Korhogo Tamale Sokode Parakou L SIERRA Freetown LEONE A Ogbomosho CÔTE D'IVOIRE Lake O Savalou Bo Bouaké Ngaoundéré N Volta G Oshogbo Lac de O T Bonthe Kossou GHANA T Ibadan I Kumasi Enugu B Benin City Yamoussoukro a Lagos C LIBERIA n d Monrovia a Koforidua Porto-Novo m Agboville Lomé Buchanan Gagnoa a CAMEROON Bight of Benin Port Calabar O Accra Harcout C Abidjan Sassandra C Takoradi a Douala Yaoundé E pe Th A Cape Palmas ree Malabo N Points E Q Gulf of Guinea U 0 100 200 300 400 500 km Bight of A T Campo Biafra O R SAO TOME I 0 100 200 300 mi AL CONGO AND PRINCIPE GUINEA GABON Map No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kimberley Process: Conflict Diamonds, WTO Obligations, and the Universality Debate Tracey Michelle Price
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Minnesota Journal of International Law 2003 The Kimberley Process: Conflict Diamonds, WTO Obligations, and the Universality Debate Tracey Michelle Price Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mjil Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Price, Tracey Michelle, "The Kimberley Process: Conflict Diamonds, WTO Obligations, and the Universality Debate" (2003). Minnesota Journal of International Law. 115. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mjil/115 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Minnesota Journal of International Law collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Articles The Kimberley Process: Conflict Diamonds, WTO Obligations, and the Universality Debate Tracey Michelle Price" "Diamondsare forever, it is often said. But lives are not. We must spare people the ordeal of war, mutilations and death for the sake of conflict diamonds."' INTRODUCTION At the hands of rebels, dictators, and terrorists, diamonds have crystallized into a source of financing for conflict and civil wars, which have caused the deaths of more than two million people.2 These "conflict" diamonds have additionally threatened to tarnish the legitimate diamond trade by associating dia- monds with hardened brutality. The international community has attempted to curb the trade of conflict diamonds and pro- mote peace and stability in Angola, the Mano River Union states,3 and the Great Lakes region 4 of Africa. In the last two * LL.M. Candidate, Georgetown University Law Center; J.D., 1997, University of Baltimore School of Law; B.A., University of Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004-11-01, Press Release, Lurd Rebel Factions Meet In
    UNAMSIL United Nations Mission in Sierra Leone PRESS RELEASE Ref No UNAMSIL/PIO/PR/ 198/2004 Date: 01 November 2004 LURD REBEL FACTIONS MEET IN FREETOWN IN EFFORTS TO RESOLVE DISPUTE Freetown, Sierra Leone – Under the chairmanship of Sierra Leone’s President Ahmad Tejan Kabbah and the facilitation of the United Nations, members of the two factions in the former rebe l Liberians United for Reconciliation and Development (LURD), including their disputed leader Sheku Damate Konneh and his challenger Kabineh Janneh, who is also Minister of Justice in the National Transitional Government of Liberia, yesterday reached “an a greement on broad principles” following a two-day meeting in Freetown aimed at resolving their differences. According to a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed at the President’s Lodge in Freetown, the two sides agreed to “work as one united entity,” agreeing that LURD would be transformed into a political movement. They expressed concern at the composition of the Liberian National Commission for Disarmament, Demobilisation, Reintegration and Resettlement (NCDDRR), which they say does not adequately a ddress the needs of their members, calling for the inclusion of senior former faction members to be appointed at senior level within the Commission. The MoU also expressed concern at recent disturbances in the Liberian capital, Monrovia, asking that an independent assessment mission be established and sent to review the disarmament process in that country. Earlier, President Ahmad Tejan Kabbah said he was optimistic the agreement would hold, adding that he had spoken on the phone with the estranged wife of Mr. Konneh, who strongly contests her husband’s leadership, and she pledged her support for the outcome of the talks.
    [Show full text]
  • Mano River Union (MRU)
    No. 13608 LIBERIA and SIERRA LEONE Mano River Declaration establishing the Mano River Union between Liberia and Sierra Leone. Concluded at Malema on 3 October 1973 First Protocol to the above-mentioned Declaration: Principles and procedures for the adoption of Pro tocols. Concluded at Bo on 3 October 1974 Second Protocol to the above-mentioned Declaration: Institutions of the Mano River Union. Concluded at Bo on 3 October 1974 Third Protocol to the above-mentioned Declaration: Celebration of the signing of the Declaration. Con cluded at Bo on 3 October 1974 Fourth Protocol to the above-mentioned Declaration: Financial arrangements of the Mano River Union. Concluded at Bo on 3 October 1974 Fifth Protocol to the above-mentioned Declaration: General Convention on privileges and immunities of the Mano River Union. Concluded at Bo on 3 October 1974 Sixth Protocol to the above-mentioned Declaration: Registration of the Mano River Declaration and its Protocols with the Secretariats of the Organization of African Unity and the United Nations Organization. Concluded at Bo on 3 October 1974 Authentic texts: English. Registered by the Secretary-General of the Mano River Union, acting on behalf of the Parties, on 1 November 1974. Vol.952,1-13608 266 United Nations — Treaty Series • Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 1974 THE MANO RIVER DECLARATION1 We, the Presidents of Liberia and Sierra Leone, Desiring to establish a firm economic foundation for lasting peace, friendship, freedom and social progress between our countries, In pursuance of our determination as already affirmed in the Joint Statements issued on 16th March, 1971, and 28th January,.
    [Show full text]
  • HUMAN SECURITY in the MANO RIVER UNION Empowering Women to Counter Gender-Based Violence in Border Communities
    HUMAN SECURITY IN THE MANO RIVER UNION Empowering women to counter gender-based violence in border communities Richard Reeve May 2010 Understanding conflict. Building peace. About International Alert International Alert is an independent peacebuilding organisation that has worked for over 20 years to lay the foundations for lasting peace and security in communities affected by violent conflict. Our multifaceted approach focuses both in and across various regions; aiming to shape policies and practices that affect peacebuilding; and helping build skills and capacity through training. Our field work is based in Africa, South Asia, the South Caucasus, Latin America, Lebanon and the Philippines. Our thematic projects work at local, regional and international levels, focusing on cross- cutting issues critical to building sustainable peace. These include business and economy, gender, governance, aid, security and justice. We are one of the world’s leading peacebuilding NGOs with more than 125 staff based in London and our 13 field offices. To learn more, visit www.international-alert.org. © International Alert 2010 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without full attribution. Layout by D. R. Ink, [email protected] Front cover image: © Sando Moore Human security in the Mano River Union Empowering women to counter gender-based violence in border communities 2 International Alert Author profile Richard Reeve Richard Reeve is Security Manager with International Alert’s Peacebuilding Issues Programme. He has researched, written and taught on security and justice issues and peace support interventions in West Africa since 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • LAND RESOURCES in the MANO RIVER UNION AREA Final Report of the Land Resources Survey Project, Mano River Union W.J. Veldkamp
    LAND RESOURCES IN THE MANO RIVER UNION AREA Final report of the Land Resources Survey project, Mano River Union Scanned from original by ISRIC - World Soil Information, as ICSU World Data Centre for Soils. The purpose is to make a safe depository for endangered documents and to make the accrued information available for consultation, following Fair Use Guidelines. Every effort is taken to respect Copyright of the materials within the archives where the identification of the Copyright holder is clear and, where feasible, to contact the originators. For questions please contact [email protected] W.J. Veldkamp indicating the item reference number concerned. Land Resources Survey project Economic Affairs Division Mano River Union Freetown, Monrovia Sierra Leone, Liberia October 1980 - 1 - Land resources in the Mano River Union area; final report of the Land Resources Survey project of the Mano River Union. CONTENTS Page Summary 3 Introduction General characterization of the Mano River Union (MRU-) area Generalized picture of the soils in the MRU-area 11 3•1 Interior Basement Complex 11 3.2 Coastal Plain 23 Existing information and results from the Land Resources Survey project 27 k.1 Reconnaissance or smaller scale 28 k.2 Semi-detailed scale 32 k.3 Detailed and very detailed scale 3U Conclusions and recommendations k3 5.1 Conclusions k3 5.1.1 General U3 5.1.2 Technical k3 5.1.3 Suitability k6 5.1.*+ Specific hi 5.2 Recommendations k& References 51 This report can be obtained through the Mano River Union, P.M.B. 133, Freetown, Sierra Leone P.O.Box 9050, Monrovia, Liberia.
    [Show full text]