DOCSLIB.ORG

D2.1 State of the Art and Requirements Analysis V1 Project Deliverable

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
D2.1 State of the Art and Requirements Analysis V1 Project Deliverable Collective Wisdom Driving Public Health Policies Del. no. – D2.1 State of the Art and Requirements Analysis v1 Project Deliverable This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Programme (H2020-SC1-2016-CNECT) under Grant Agreement No. 727560 D2.1 State of the Art and Requirements 29/09/2017 Analysis v1 D2.1 State of the Art and Requirements Analysis v1 Work Package: WP2 Due Date: 01/09/2017 Submission Date: 29/09/2017 Start Date of Project: 01/03/2017 Duration of Project: 36 Months Partner Responsible of Deliverable: SIEMENS Version: 1.0 Final Draft Ready for internal Review Status: Task Leader Accepted WP leader accepted Project Coordinator accepted Dimosthenis Kyriazis (UPRC), Ilias Maglogiannis (UPRC), Christos Xenakis (UPRC), Argyro Mavrogiorgou (UPRC), Athanasios Kiourtis (UPRC), George Peppas (UPRC), Carlos Cavero (ATOS), Santiago Aso (ATOS), Antonio De Nigro (ENG), Francesco Torelli (ENG), Domenico Martino (ENG), George Moldovan (SIEMENS), Kosmin- Septimiu Nechifor (SIEMENS), Salvador Tortajada Velert (HULAFE), Sokratis Nifakos (KI), Tanja Tomson (KI), Jan Janssen (DFKI), Serge Autexier (DFKI), Petrina Smyrli (BIO), Andreas Menychtas (BIO), Author name(s): Christos Panagopoulos (BIO), Chris Orton (ICE), Usman Wajid (ICE), Thanos Kosmidis (CRA), Ricardo Jimenez-Peris (LXS), Patricio Martinez (LXS), Marta Patino-Martinez (UPM), Rafael Fernandez (UPM), Michael Boniface (IT-INN), Vegard Engen (IT- INN), Daniel Burns (IT-INN), Mitja Lustrek (JSI), Maroje Soric (ULJ), Patrick Weber (EFMI), John Mantas (EFMI), Konstantinos Perakis (SILO), Spyros Mantzouratos (SILO), Stelios Pantelopoulos (SILO), Dalibor Stanimirovic (NIJZ) Reviewer(s): Carlos Cavero (ATOS), Santiago Aso (ATOS), Mitja Lustrek (JSI) Nature: R – Report D – Demonstrator PU – Public Dissemination level: CO – Confidential RE – Restricted REVISION HISTORY Version Date Author(s) Changes made 0.1 04/07/2017 SIEMENS Initial ToC 0.2 04/07/2017 UPRC Updated ToC & Assignments 0.3 11/08/2017 SIEMENS Initial inputs integrated 0.4 21/08/2017 SIEMENS Updated inputs integrated 0.5 23/08/2017 SIEMENS Fixed references 0.6 28/08/2017 SIEMENS Version for internal review submitted 0.7 04/09/2017 SIEMENS Integrated new inputs based on review 2/171 D2.1 State of the Art and Requirements 29/09/2017 Analysis v1 comments 0.8 18/09/2017 SIEMENS Integrated additional inputs based on review comments 1.0 29/09/2017 SIEMENS Final version 3/171 D2.1 State of the Art and Requirements 29/09/2017 Analysis v1 Executive Summary This ample report examines the state of the art in the realization the mechanisms and algorithms the CrowdHEALTH platform – a secure ICT platform that will incorporate the collective knowledge about health that emerges from multiple heterogeneous source - will be based on, namely of the holistic health care records, of the heterogeneous data aggregation systems and algorithms, of the big data analysis and storage, mining, forecasting and visualization, as well as of the policy development toolkits. Security and privacy enhancing and enforcing mechanisms are also presented and an overview is provided as well. Alongside the state of the art, the enhancements to the previously mentioned mechanisms and toolkits that are planned for CrowdHEALTH will be presented, in order to provide a clear overview of the contributions added and validated through the run of the project. A second major goal of this report is to provide a comprehensive requirements list, which will be considered during the development of the platform, and which will be later evaluated during the implementation of the pilot programs. More specifically, the requirements will help the research and development efforts by providing support and guiding the decisions and strategies adopted during the specific work packages. 4/171 D2.1 State of the Art and Requirements 29/09/2017 Analysis v1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ 4 Table of Contents .................................................................................................................... 5 Table of Figures ...................................................................................................................... 7 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 8 2. Terminology ................................................................................................................... 10 3. Requirements ................................................................................................................. 11 3.1. Use cases requirements .......................................................................................... 12 3.1.1. Use Case #1: Overweight and obesity control .................................................. 12 3.1.2. Use Case #2: Chronic disease management ................................................... 18 3.1.3. Use Case #3: Online coaching for cancer patients ........................................... 29 3.1.4. Use Case #4: SLOfit ........................................................................................ 34 3.1.5. Use Case #5: Cardiobox .................................................................................. 45 3.1.6. Use Case #6: Nutrition and Activities ............................................................... 52 3.2. Technical requirements ........................................................................................... 60 3.2.1. Holistic health records & clusters of HHRs ....................................................... 60 3.2.2. Gateways for data sources ............................................................................... 70 3.2.3. Data quality assessment and cleaning ............................................................. 75 3.2.4. Aggregation ...................................................................................................... 84 3.2.5. Interoperability ................................................................................................. 86 3.2.6. Big data storage and analytics ......................................................................... 88 3.2.7. Visualization ..................................................................................................... 92 3.2.8. Public health policies modelling and evaluation ................................................ 95 3.2.9. Risk models and models execution .................................................................. 97 3.2.10. Clinical pathway mining .............................................................................. 100 3.2.11. Multimodal forecasting ................................................................................ 103 3.2.12. Causal analysis .......................................................................................... 105 3.2.13. Context analysis ......................................................................................... 106 3.2.14. Policy development toolkit .......................................................................... 107 3.2.15. Trust management and reputation modelling .............................................. 108 5/171 D2.1 State of the Art and Requirements 29/09/2017 Analysis v1 3.2.16. Anonymization, authentication, authorization, and access control............... 110 4. State of the Art Analysis ............................................................................................... 112 4.1. Holistic health records ........................................................................................... 112 4.1.1. State of the Art ............................................................................................... 112 4.1.2. Advancements in CrowdHEALTH .................................................................. 115 4.2. Gateways for data sources .................................................................................... 116 4.2.1. State of the Art ............................................................................................... 116 4.2.2. Advancements in CrowdHEALTH .................................................................. 117 4.3. Data quality assessment and cleaning .................................................................. 117 4.3.1. State of the Art ............................................................................................... 117 4.3.2. Advancements in CrowdHEALTH .................................................................. 118 4.4. Aggregation ........................................................................................................... 119 4.4.1. State of the Art ............................................................................................... 119 4.4.2. Advancements in CrowdHEALTH .................................................................. 120 4.5. Interoperability ...................................................................................................... 121 4.5.1. State of the Art ............................................................................................... 121 4.5.2. Advancements in CrowdHEALTH .................................................................. 127 4.6. Big data storage and analytics .............................................................................. 128 4.6.1. State of the Art ..............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 11 AC Group's 2007 Annual Report the Digital Medical Office Of
    Chapter 11 AC Group’s 2007 Annual Report The Digital Medical Office of the Future Performance A. Methodology The majority of previous EMR evaluations have been limited to self-reported functionality. Although high rankings in this arena often indicate a superior product, the reviewers are aware that in some cases this correlation does not always hold. There may be some highly ranked products offering the full range of functionality that from the end user’s point of view may have features, organization or display that are limiting. The converse may also occur where a product that achieves a lower ranking because it offers less that full functionality nonetheless offers highly innovative features that would be advantageous for all end users. In short, although scores from self-reported functionality are extremely useful, they do not capture rich qualitative information that could significantly influence the practitioner’s decision of which system to choose. The purpose of this document is to help a physician evaluate a vendor’s solution. The document is divided into separate product demonstrations. If the practice is interested in one fully integrated system, then have the vendor complete and interact with this entire document. If the practice is only interested in a Document Image Management solution, complete sections B and D. If the practice is only interested in a comprehensive EMR/EHR application, then complete sections B and E. Speed is essential Time the execution of the tasks and record how long they take. You may be surprised at the significant difference in the results. Speed is extremely important during physician documentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Healthcare It Industry Update │ Q3 2016
    HEALTHCARE IT INDUSTRY UPDATE │ Q3 2016 www.harriswilliams.com Investment banking services are provided by Harris Williams LLC, a registered broker-dealer and member of FINRA and SIPC, and Harris Williams & Co. Ltd, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Harris Williams & Co. is a trade name under which Harris Williams LLC and Harris Williams & Co. Ltd conduct business. 0 HEALTHCARE IT INDUSTRY UPDATE | Q3 2016 HEALTHCARE IT PRACTICE OVERVIEW CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . WHAT WE’RE READING Harris Williams & Co. is pleased to present our review of Q3 Healthcare IT . KEY HEALTHCARE MACRO activity. This report provides commentary and analysis on current capital market INDICATORS trends and merger and acquisition dynamics within the Healthcare IT industry. PUBLIC MARKETS . PUBLIC COMPARABLES We hope you find this edition helpful and encourage you to contact us directly if . M&A ACTIVITY you would like to discuss our perspective on current industry trends and M&A . PRIVATE PLACEMENT ACTIVITY opportunities or our relevant industry experience. IPO ACTIVITY OUR PRACTICE CONTACTS Sam Hendler Harris Williams & Co. is a leading advisor to the Healthcare IT industry. Our global Managing Director practice includes professionals across the firm from Harris Williams & Co.’s [email protected] Technology, Media & Telecom Group and Healthcare & Life Sciences Group. +1 (617) 654-2117 Jeff Bistrong HW&Co. Healthcare IT Taxonomy Managing Director [email protected] +1 (617) 654-2102 . Patient-Facing Solutions Mike Wilkins . Care Delivery: Managing Director Operational Efficiency [email protected] +1 (415) 271-3411 . Care Delivery: Clinical / Acute Thierry Monjauze Managing Director . Care Delivery: [email protected] Clinical / Non-Acute +44 20 7518 8901 CARE DELIVERY EMPLOYERS ORGANIZATIONS PATIENTS .
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from The
    Ideas from the NHS Dr. Francis Wong, MBBS, MBA, MPH www.franciswong.com September 2018 Purpose Background: The NHS (National Health System) is the largest single-payer system in the world and was ranked #1 in the Commonwealth Fund’s Health Care System Performance Rankings in 20171 (US placed #11). It achieved particularly high scores in Care Process (prevention, safe care, coordination & patient engagement), Access (timeliness & affordability) and Equity. The NHS is also one of the world’s largest employers with around 1.5m staff nationwide. In 2014, the UK spent 9.8% of GDP on healthcare2. Of course, it is not without shortcomings, but I am immensely proud of the NHS and stand behind its founding principles. As a physician who has worked in both UK and US, I believe there is much that the countries can learn from each other. My goals for this document are: • Outline several examples of successful, promising and even controversial innovations in the UK’s National Health Service with an emphasis on primary care. • Briefly describe their impact on care delivery in the UK. • Hypothesize how these innovations might be applied to a US employer-based model. 1 Commonwealth Fund: Mirror, Mirror 2017 2 NHS spends about EU average as percentage of GDP on health Primary Care as Gatekeeper Overview Impact Relevance In England, there are approximately 340M GP Primary care as a gatekeeper to specialists is The gatekeeping role of primary care in the UK consultations a year with an average of 6 visits not a novel concept in the US and is a defining originated over 100 years ago, prior to the per year.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Thesis
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Big data approaches to investigating Child Mental Health disorder outcomes Downs, Jonathan Muir Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 07. Oct. 2021 BIG DATA APPROACHES TO INVESTIGATING CHILD MENTAL HEALTH DISORDER OUTCOMES JOHNNY DOWNS Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2017 Department of Psychological Medicine Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience King’s College London ABSTRACT Background: In the UK, administrative data resources continue to expand across publically funded youth-orientated health, education and social services.
    [Show full text]
  • NHS Data: Maximising Its Impact on the Health and Wealth of the United Kingdom Saira Ghafur, Gianluca Fontana, Jack Halligan James O’Shaughnessy & Ara Darzi Contents
    NHS data: Maximising its impact on the health and wealth of the United Kingdom Saira Ghafur, Gianluca Fontana, Jack Halligan James O’Shaughnessy & Ara Darzi Contents 02 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 04 FOREWORD 05 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 08 INTRODUCTION: MAXIMISING THE IMPACT OF NHS DATA 12 PUBLIC OPINION AND ENGAGEMENT 16 DATA GOVERNANCE AND LEGAL FRAMEWORKS 20 DATA QUALITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE 24 CAPABILITIES 26 INVESTMENT SUGGESTED CITATION Ghafur S, Fontana G, Halligan J, O’Shaughnessy J, Darzi A. NHS data: Maximising its impact 28 VALUE SHARING on the health and wealth of the United Kingdom. Imperial College London (2020) doi: 10.25561/76409 34 REFERENCES Acknowledgements We would like to thank the following people who contributed to this document through interviews/ attendance at a round table and have agreed to be acknowledged: NAME ORGANISATION Dr. Natalie Banner * Understanding Patient Data Professor Sir John Bell * The Academy of Medical Sciences Kate Cheema British Heart Foundation Professor Diane Coyle University of Cambridge Douglas de Jager * Human.ai Rachel Dunscombe * NHS Digital Academy Dr. Andrew Elder Albion Capital Lord Valerian Freyberg * House of Lords John Godfrey * Legal & General Joanne Hackett * Genomics England Dr. Hugh Harvey * Hardian Health Eleonora Harwich * Reform A total of 26 one-to-one interviews were held with individuals with a strong Geoff Heyes Mind interest in this topic. Interviewees included representatives from government, Dr. Dominic King Google Health the NHS, academia, industry (technology and life sciences), research Dr. Jack Kreindler * Centre for Health & Human Performance institutions, charities and data privacy organisations. We have not consulted the public or healthcare professionals for the purposes of this paper, as we Michael MacDonnell * Google Health chose to focus on experts in the data policy and governance space.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Health in the UK: an Industry Study for the Office of Life Sciences
    Digital Health in the UK An industry study for the Office of Life Sciences September 2015 Contents Foreword 1 Executive summary 2 Part 1. Market introduction 6 Part 2. Telehealthcare 10 Part 3. mHealth 21 Part 4. Data Analytics 32 Part 5. Digitised health systems 39 Part 6. Conclusions on the digital health UK competitive position 45 Monitor Deloitte team 51 References 52 Foreword Welcome to the Monitor Deloitte report on Digital Health. This is one of a series of reports reflecting work commissioned by Office of Life Sciences in March 2015 on key healthcare and life science industry segments in the United Kingdom. Digital Health is an emerging industry arising from the intersection of healthcare services, information technology and mobile technology. Digital health innovations are only just starting to be more widely accepted as necessary for the future of efficient healthcare service delivery. As we address the behaviour, social, legal and technical challenges, over time, digital health advances have the potential to help increase access, decrease healthcare system costs and improve health outcomes. This report analyses trends in the digital health industry based on discussions with stakeholders, literature reviews and our work across the sector. It focuses on the United Kingdom but in the context of the global market and draws on examples from other countries. The report considers the challenges to growth, barriers to adoption, shifting dynamics and how the emergent industry is developing. The intention is to provoke discussion and offer readers an overview of the industry challenges and dynamics in the United Kingdom. We welcome your feedback and comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Landscape of UK Health Data Research & Innovation
    Mapping the Landscape of UK Health Data Research & Innovation A snapshot of activity in 2017 Dr Ekaterini Blaveri October 2017 CONTENTS Foreword 5 1. Background to this review 7 1.1. Aims 8 1.2. Scope and sections 8 1.3. Approach 9 1.4. Challenges 10 1.5. Acknowledgements 10 2. Overview of major informatics investments by Funder 11 2.1. MRC 12 2.1.1. The Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research 12 2.1.2. MRC Medical Bioinformatics initiative 16 2.1.3. MRC Capital Investment in Genomics England Data Infrastructure 19 2.2.1. The NIHR Biomedical Research Centres 21 2.2.2. The NIHR Health Informatics Collaborative programme 22 2.2.3. The NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care 25 2.3. Department of Health and Social Care 26 2.3.1. Academic Health Science Centres 26 2.3.2. Genomics England | 100,000 Genomes Project 27 2.4. NHS 28 2.4.1. Academic Health Science Networks 28 2.4.2. NHS Genomic Medicine Centres 30 2.4.3. NHS Global Digital Exemplars 31 2.5. ESRC’s investments in Big Data 32 2.5.1. Administrative Data Research Network 32 2.6. EPSRC’s health data research investments 33 3. Key informatics investments by Research Organisation 35 England – East Anglia and Midlands 38 University of Cambridge 41 EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute 48 Wellcome Sanger Institute 52 University of Birmingham 56 University of Leicester 62 University of Warwick 68 England – London 74 Imperial College London 76 King’s College London 85 London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine 94 Queen Mary University of London 98 University
    [Show full text]
  • Orion Health Group Limited Independent Adviser’S Report and Independent Appraisal Report
    Orion Health Group Limited Independent Adviser’s Report and Independent Appraisal Report September 2018 STATEMENT OF INDEPENDENCE KordaMentha confirms that it: (a) has no conflict of interest that could affect its ability to provide an unbiased report; and (b) has no direct or indirect pecuniary or other interest in the proposed transaction considered in this report, including any success or contingency fee or remuneration, other than to receive the cash fee for providing this report. KordaMentha has satisfied the Takeovers Panel, on the basis of the material provided to the Panel, that it is independent under the Takeovers Code for the purposes of preparing this report. Independent New Zealand firm internationally affiliated with KordaMentha Contents 1 Terms of the Proposed Transactions ........................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 The Proposed Transactions ................................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Shareholder Approval .......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Purpose of the Report .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • EMIS Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018 the UK Leader in Connected Strategic Report 1 Highlights 2 at a Glance Healthcare Software and Services
    EMIS Group plc EMIS Group Annual report and accounts 2018 and accounts Annual report ENERGISED FOCUSSED& EMIS Group plc Annual report and accounts 2018 The UK leader in connected Strategic report 1 Highlights 2 At a glance healthcare software and services. 4 Chairman’s statement 6 Chief Executive Officer’s statement ENERGISED 10 Business model 12 Markets EMIS Group’s energy is directed towards growth in both 14 Strategy the core NHS markets and the business-to-business (B2B) 18 Key performance indicators 20 Alternative performance measures enterprise healthcare market, through the delivery of 22 Principal risks and uncertainties exciting technology innovations. 28 Operational review 34 Financial review 38 Our people FOCUSSED 41 Sustainability policy EMIS Group is focussed on delivering connected healthcare, Governance through high-quality technology products and services, 42 Board of Directors putting patient care and clinical standards at the heart 44 Corporate governance of everything it does. 51 Report of the audit committee 56 Report of the nomination committee 58 Report of the remuneration committee 61 Directors’ remuneration report 72 Directors’ report 75 Viability statement “The business performed well 76 Statement of Directors’ responsibilities with growing revenues across Financial statements 77 Independent auditor’s report 82 Group statement of comprehensive income all our key segments.” 83 Group and parent company balance sheets 84 Group and parent company Andy Thorburn statements of cash flows Chief Executive Officer 85 Group and parent company statements of changes in equity 86 Notes to the financial statements 110 Five-year Group financial summary 111 Shareholder information 112 Directors and advisers Highlights FINANCIAL No.
    [Show full text]
  • EMIS Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020
    EMIS Group plc EMIS Group Annual report and accounts 2020 and accounts report Annual Supporting our customers EMIS Group plc Annual report and accounts 2020 The UK leader in connected healthcare software and systems SUPPORTING CUSTOMERS GROWTH EMIS Group supports the healthcare sector EMIS Group delivered resilient results during with technology that drives improvements to the pandemic, maintaining its track record of efficiency and enables better patient outcomes. increasing dividends every year since flotation. Strategic report Governance Financial statements 1 Highlights 46 Board of Directors 82 Independent auditor’s report 2 At a glance 48 Chair’s introduction to governance 88 Group statement of 4 Covid-19 response 49 Corporate governance statement comprehensive income 6 Chair’s statement 55 Report of the audit committee 89 Group and parent company balance sheets 8 Chief Executive Officer’s statement 60 Report of the nomination committee 90 Group and parent company 10 Business model 62 Report of the remuneration committee statements of cash flows 12 Stakeholder engagement 65 Directors’ remuneration report 91 Group and parent company statements 16 Markets 77 Directors’ report of changes in equity 18 Strategy 80 Viability statement 92 Notes to the financial statements 20 Key performance indicators 81 Statement of Directors’ responsibilities 115 Five-year Group financial summary 22 Alternative performance measures 116 Shareholder information 24 Operational review IBC Glossary 28 Principal risks and uncertainties 34 Sustainability 42 Financial
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Healthcare Research
    November 2015 Independent Technology Research Report DIGITAL HEALTHCARE Important disclosures appear at the back of this report GP Bullhound LLP is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority Local Challenges, Global Opportunities Digital technology is coming of age in the healthcare sector Governments, insurers, employers and most importantly patients and their physicians recognise that digital technology is the key to meeting the challenges of healthcare provision in the 21st Century. The most relevant and exciting digital services and applications are being developed by fast growing SMEs. Healthcare systems worldwide are facing unprecedented challenges Global healthcare spend accounts for 10.6% of GDP. Spend is forecast to grow more than 5% annually to 2018 as the global proportion of those aged over 60 increases from 12% in 2013 to 21% in 2050. The nature of the challenges faced varies across national markets, but the impetus for new models of healthcare is clear globally. Digital enables transformational models of admin, funding and care Cloud software, smartphone applications, online marketplaces and data analytics are established technologies that the healthcare sector is only now embracing. They are key as healthcare seeks to become more efficient and patient centric, paying for outcomes delivered and with much care and treatment provided remotely. B2B models are best placed – but sales strategies must be multifaceted Digital healthcare companies selling to, or partnering with, enterprise level clients will be the winners in the medium term. SMEs must sell in at the board and departmental, national and local level to maximise their chances of success. SMEs must be healthcare experts as well as digital natives Healthcare is incredibly complex – from heavy regulation to labyrinthine decision making to multi-layered payment systems.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Document Overview
    Ref. Ares(2016)4844807 - 29/08/2016 C3-Cloud “A Federated Collaborative Care Cure Cloud Architecture for Addressing the Needs of Multi-morbidity and Managing Poly-pharmacy” PRIORITY Objective H2020-PHC-25-2015 - Advanced ICT systems and services for integrated care D8.1 Use Cases and Requirements Specifications of the Pilot Application Work Package: WP8 C3-Cloud Pilot Application Development & Deployment Due Date: 31 August 2016 Actual Submission Date: 29 August 2016 Project Dates: Project Start Date: 01 May 2016 Project End Date: 30 April 2020 Project Duration: 48 months Deliverable Leader: RJH Project funded by the European Commission within the Horizon 2020 Programme (2014-2020) Dissemination Level PU Public X CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) EU-RES Classified Information: RESTREINT UE (Commission Decision 2005/444/EC) EU-CON Classified Information: CONFIDENTIEL UE (Commission Decision 2005/444/EC) EU-SEC Classified Information: SECRET UE (Commission Decision 2005/444/EC) 689181 – C3-Cloud Document History: Version Date Changes From Review V0.1 2016-05-11 Initial Document ORU All Consortium V0.2 2016-06-29 4.1.2, 5.1 and 5.2 added RJH/KG/ All Consortium OSAKIDETZA V0.3 2016-07-01 Restructuring of the overall document with SRDC All Consortium introduction of new sections and update of existing ones. V0.4 2016-08-26 Merging input from different partners and RJH All Consortium answers to raised questions, minor structural changes. Adding list of definitions, abbreviations and executive summary and PAR-57 to PAR-60 (section 5) and moved PDFs etc. to the addendum (section 7) V0.5 2016-08-26 SRDC Review SRDC All Consortium V0.6 2016-08-28 Quality review of all the document and ORU RJH and extensive revisions to the descriptions of the Warwick ICT landscape in RJH.
    [Show full text]