DOCSLIB.ORG

European Parliament Eu-Ukraine Parliamentary Cooperation Committee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
European Parliament Eu-Ukraine Parliamentary Cooperation Committee EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT EU-UKRAINE PARLIAMENTARY COOPERATION COMMITTEE MINUTES of the TWELTH MEETING 24 - 25 February 2009 BRUSSELS CONTENTS 1. Adoption of draft agenda PE 412.693.....................................................................3 2. Adoption of the minutes of the 11th meeting of the EU-Ukraine PCC in Kyiv and Yalta on 2-3 October 2008.............. .......................................................................3 3. State of play of the EU-Ukraine relations, including the negotiations on the Association Agreement and talks on the Free Trade Area (FTA) agreement.........3 4. Political and economic situation in Ukraine and the EU, following the global financial crisis and in the view of respective political and institutional reforms....3 Joint Debate on points 3 and 4 with statements by - Government of Ukraine - Presidency-in-Office of the Council of the European Union - European Commission 5. Energy cooperation, especially regarding the security of energy supply...............6 6. Implementation of the EU-Ukraine visa facilitation and readmission agreement and perspectives of a visa-free regime and people-to-people contacts...................8 7. Cooperation in the common neighbourhood, including the launching of the Eastern Partnership and the setting up of an EU Neighbourhood East Parliamentary Assembly (EURO-NEST)................................................................9 8. Follow-up of the final statement and recommendations of the 11th EU-Ukraine PCC meeting..........................................................................................................10 9. Adoption of the final statement and recommendations.........................................10 10. Any other business.................................................................................................10 11. Date and place of the next meeting........................................................................11 Annex: List of participants ________________ PV\798204EN.doc 1 PE 428.999 The EU-Ukrainian Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (PCC) 12th meeting opened on 24 February 2009 at 15.30 under the co-chairmanship of Mr. Adrian SEVERIN (European Parliament) and Mr. Borys TARASYUK, Chairman of the Verkhovna Rada (Ukrainian Parliament). Mr. SEVERIN opened the meeting and welcomed all the participants. He expressed his hope that the 12th EU-Ukraine PCC would be fruitful and good and would deepen the EU-Ukraine cooperation. The speaker noted that the meeting was taking place in turbulent times, in the midst of global crisis and in the aftermath of Ukraine-Russia gas dispute, which had raised deep concern in the EU and had forced the EU to rethink its overall energy policy. Mr. SEVERIN also spoke about the continuing political instability in Ukraine because of the power struggle between the President and the Prime Minister. He expressed his believes that Ukraine's closer integration with the EU would direct the country towards the development of a real democracy, of a functioning market economy and of a free society. The speaker also encouraged the Ukrainian delegation members to inform the Committee about the current economic and political unstable situation in Ukraine and to suggest how the EU could help in that regard. Mr. SEVERIN then briefly introduced the agenda of the meeting showing the common purpose of the both delegations. He also called on Ukraine to be more united and to show more European consistency at the same time. Mr. TARASYUK took the floor and welcomed all the members of the EU delegation and presented the members of the Verkhovna Rada delegation. He noted that it was the last PCC meeting before the European Parliament elections and wished success to the EP colleagues during the campaign. Mr. TARASYUK said that the beginning of political crisis in Ukraine was partly overcome with the help of global economic and financial crises because the parliamentary elections had been postponed and new trilateral coalition had emerged in the Ukrainian Parliament. The speaker noted that it had not been Ukraine that had initiated the recent gas crisis and that it had been Russia that cut off gas supply. He thanked the EU for being the facilitator in the resolution of the crisis. Mr. TARASYUK also mentioned the Association Agreement and expressed his believes that it would fully emerge by its contents as the result of current negotiations. The speaker also welcomed the initiative of Eastern Partnership and declared that Ukraine was ready to participate in the EU Neighbourhood East Parliamentary Assembly (EURO-NEST) as it had been expressed in the reply-letter of Mr Volodymyr Lytvyn, Chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, to the EP President Poettering. The speaker also mentioned the EU-Ukraine visa facilitation and readmission agreement and expressed his hopes that the Committee would prepare the draft statement and resolution in the same fruitful way as it had done before. Mr. SEVERIN took the floor. ________________ PV\798204EN.doc 2 PE 428.999 1. Adoption of draft agenda The draft agenda of the 12th PCC meeting was adopted. 2. Adoption of the minutes of the 11th meeting of the EU-Ukraine PCC in Kyiv and Yalta on 2-3 October 2008 Minutes of the 11th PCC meeting were adopted. Mr. SEVERIN also declared that for the draft joint statement of the 12th PCC meeting all text proposals and amendments should be presented during the PCC itself. Eventual amendments, if any, would have to be submitted to the Delegation Secretariat by 18h00, 24 February. Joint Debate: 3. State of play of the EU-Ukraine relations, including the negotiations on the Association Agreement and talks on the Free Trade Area (FTA) agreement 4. Political and economic situation in Ukraine and the EU, following the global financial crisis and in the view of respective political and institutional reforms Mr. SEVERIN then opened the floor for a joint debate. Ambassador Andriy VESELOVSKY, Head of the Ukrainian Mission to the EU, made a statement on behalf of the Government of Ukraine. He started by saying that although there were legislative controversies and institutional imperfections in Ukraine, the political and economic reforms were underway to address European standards. He noted that European integration was perceived as political platform by major political forces in Ukraine. Ambassador VESELOVSKY said that global economic crisis had its strong impact on Ukraine. The Government had undertaken relevant measures to support financial institutions and prevent their break-down. A comprehensive anti-crisis package had been created to stabilise the situation in finance and banking sector, to support industry and to increase the flow of investments. Ambassador VESELOVSKY then spoke on Ukraine-EU relations. He said that Ukraine was the only country in Eastern Europe that enjoyed a very close relationship with the EU. The speaker noted that the items on the agenda of the meeting were important for Ukraine and briefly informed the Committee on Ukraine's progress on the items. He also encouraged the EU to meet Ukrainian expectations. The speaker concluded by saying that he hoped that Ukraine would continue its deep and comprehensive dialogue with the EU. Mr. John KJAER, Head of Unit for relations with Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova and the South Caucasus, intervened on behalf of the European Commission. He started by talking about Ukraine-EU relations. He mentioned the EU-Ukraine summit in Paris in 2008 and the successful negotiations on energy, environment, justice and home affairs, human rights and democratisation and people to people contacts. He talked about progress at the EU-Ukraine visa-free regime, the Association Agreement, the Free Trade Area (FTA) Agreement and new Action Plan Agreement negotiations. ________________ PV\798204EN.doc 3 PE 428.999 Mr. KJAER also reminded that Ukrainian territorial integrity and sovereignty was very important. He spoke as well on the assistance provided by the EU and its constant growth. Mr. KJAER then raised the issue of economic and political situation in Ukraine. He acknowledged that Ukrainian Government took leadership in much needed reforms and the speaker encouraged further reforms. He highlighted that recent gas dispute had been very damaging. He concluded by saying that Ukraine was a key strategic partner for the EU and key political and economic reforms in Ukraine would make it able to rise to the challenges the whole world was facing at the moment. Ambassador Milena VICENOVA, Permanent Representative of the Czech Republic to the EU, intervened on behalf of the Presidency-in-Office of the Council of the European Union. She started by welcoming all the participants and by saying that Ukraine was the topical issue for the Council of the European Union. During Czech Presidency the priority would be given to deep Free Trade Agreement. The speaker also highlighted the importance of the Association Agreement and the Eastern Partnership negotiations. She expressed her hope that further progress would be reached in bringing Ukraine and other Eastern European countries closer to Europe. Mr. TARASYUK reminded the Committee that the EU had been very helpful in resolving the recent gas dispute. He noted that the Association Agreement, which would bring Ukraine closer to the EU membership; Free Trade Agreement and its quality; visa-free regime; in-depth regional cooperation and European common foreign and security policy were the most important areas of EU-Ukraine negotiations. Mr. SEVERIN posed a question both to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Future for Ukraine?
    OÂRODEK STUDIÓW WSCHODNICH Centre for Eastern Studies Dokàd zmierzasz, Ukraino? What Future for Ukraine? Anna Górska Warszawa, czerwiec 2005 / Warsaw, June 2005 © Copyright by OÊrodek Studiów Wschodnich © Copyright by Centre for Eastern Studies Redaktor serii / Series editor Anna ¸abuszewska Opracowanie graficzne / Graphic design Dorota Nowacka T∏umaczenie / Translation Izabela Zygmunt Wydawca / Publisher OÊrodek Studiów Wschodnich Centre for Eastern Studies ul. Koszykowa 6a Warszawa / Warsaw, Poland tel./phone + 48 /22/ 525 80 00 fax: +48 /22/ 525 80 40 Spis treÊci / Contents Dokàd zmierzasz, Ukraino? / 5 I. Trudny okres przejmowania w∏adzy / 6 II. Paƒstwo demokratyczne / 9 III. Paƒstwo prawa / 11 IV. Gospodarka rynkowa / 14 V. Czy Zachód mo˝e wspomóc Ukrain´ / 16 Za∏àcznik I / 18 Za∏àcznik II / 24 What Future for Ukraine? / 27 I. Difficult Period of the Transfer of Power / 28 II. A Democratic State / 31 III. A State of Law / 34 IV. Market Economy / 37 V. Can the West help Ukraine / 38 Appendix No 1 / 41 Appendix No 2 / 47 Dokàd zmierzasz, Ukraino? Min´∏o sto dni od inauguracji prezydenta Ukrainy Wiktora Juszczenki i po- wo∏ania nowego rzàdu z Julià Tymoszenko na czele, co tradycyjnie sk∏a- nia do pierwszych podsumowaƒ i oceny polityki nowych w∏adz. W przy- padku Ukrainy jest to szczególnie interesujàce. Zmiana w∏adzy nastàpi∏a w du˝ej mierze w wyniku antysystemowego protestu spo∏ecznego, okre- Êlanego jako pomaraƒczowa rewolucja1. W zasadzie Majdan nie formu- ∏owa∏ pozytywnych hase∏ programowych, a jedynie wyraziÊcie okreÊla∏, czego spo∏eczeƒstwo ju˝ nie akceptuje – samowoli w∏adzy, korupcji, bie- dy, k∏amstwa w najwy˝szych gabinetach i mediach, przedmiotowego traktowania spo∏eczeƒstwa, o którym w∏adza przypomina sobie jedynie w kampaniach wyborczych, ale i tak nie respektuje woli wyborców.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Political Corruption in Ukraine
    NATIONAL SECURITY & DEFENCE π 7 (111) CONTENTS POLITICAL CORRUPTION IN UKRAINE: ACTORS, MANIFESTATIONS, 2009 PROBLEMS OF COUNTERING (Analytical Report) ................................................................................................... 2 Founded and published by: SECTION 1. POLITICAL CORRUPTION AS A PHENOMENON: APPROACHES TO DEFINITION ..................................................................3 SECTION 2. POLITICAL CORRUPTION IN UKRAINE: POTENTIAL ACTORS, AREAS, MANIFESTATIONS, TRENDS ...................................................................8 SECTION 3. FACTORS INFLUENCING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COUNTERING UKRAINIAN CENTRE FOR ECONOMIC & POLITICAL STUDIES POLITICAL CORRUPTION ......................................................................33 NAMED AFTER OLEXANDER RAZUMKOV SECTION 4. CONCLUSIONS AND PROPOSALS ......................................................... 40 ANNEX 1 FOREIGN ASSESSMENTS OF THE POLITICAL CORRUPTION Director General Anatoliy Rachok LEVEL IN UKRAINE (INTERNATIONAL CORRUPTION RATINGS) ............43 Editor-in-Chief Yevhen Shulha ANNEX 2 POLITICAL CORRUPTION: SPECIFICITY, SCALE AND WAYS Layout and design Oleksandr Shaptala OF COUNTERING IN EXPERT ASSESSMENTS ......................................44 Technical & computer support Volodymyr Kekuh ANNEX 3 POLITICAL CORRUPTION: SCALE AND WAYS OF COUNTERING IN PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS AND ASSESSMENTS ...................................49 This magazine is registered with the State Committee ARTICLE of Ukraine for Information Policy, POLITICAL
    [Show full text]
  • Temptation to Control
    PrESS frEEDOM IN UKRAINE : TEMPTATION TO CONTROL ////////////////// REPORT BY JEAN-FRANÇOIS JULLIARD AND ELSA VIDAL ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// AUGUST 2010 /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// PRESS FREEDOM: REPORT OF FACT-FINDING VISIT TO UKRAINE ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 2 Natalia Negrey / public action at Mykhaylivska Square in Kiev in November of 2009 Many journalists, free speech organisations and opposition parliamentarians are concerned to see the government becoming more and more remote and impenetrable. During a public meeting on 20 July between Reporters Without Borders and members of the Ukrainian parliament’s Committee of Enquiry into Freedom of Expression, parliamentarian Andrei Shevchenko deplored not only the increase in press freedom violations but also, and above all, the disturbing and challenging lack of reaction from the government. The data gathered by the organisation in the course of its monitoring of Ukraine confirms that there has been a significant increase in reports of press freedom violations since Viktor Yanukovych’s election as president in February. LEGISlaTIVE ISSUES The government’s desire to control journalists is reflected in the legislative domain. Reporters Without Borders visited Ukraine from 19 to 21 July in order to accomplish The Commission for Establishing Freedom the first part of an evaluation of the press freedom situation. of Expression, which was attached to the presi- It met national and local media representatives, members of press freedom dent’s office, was dissolved without explanation NGOs (Stop Censorship, Telekritika, SNUJ and IMI), ruling party and opposition parliamentarians and representatives of the prosecutor-general’s office. on 2 April by a decree posted on the president’s At the end of this initial visit, Reporters Without Borders gave a news conference website on 9 April.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Intelligence” Endorsed Three Bills, Prepared by His Staff, Aimed at Reducing the Autonomy of Local and Regional Last Issue Authorities
    N°41 - September 27 2007 Published every two weeks/International Edition CONTENTS ELECTION P. 1-2 Politics & Government c ELECTION On the Eve of the Battle c On the Eve of the Battle With only a few days to go before the snap legislative election on September 30, tension is mount- INTERVIEW ing in Kyiv. Ukraine’s three main political protagonists – Viktor Yushchenko, Viktor Yanukovich c Roman Zvarych : «Let’s govern with Timoshenko» and Yulia Timoshenko – are getting ready for the fray, and pretending to ignore the agitation in their respective camps, brought on by the uncertainty of the vote. The Prime Minister, who is now devoting himself full-time to the campaign, is trying to regain the upper hand, after a summer’s P. 3-4 Business & Networks end dominated by the president, who was frequently in the press, and systematically countered FOCUS any government initiative (UI n°39 of August 30 3007). Viktor Yanukovich, on visit in Crimea on c Media, Politics and Money September 21, set the tone when he warned the president against any electoral or post electoral ALERT c Commerzbank Gains manipulation. Otherwise, he saw fit to add, “Some people may not have time to leave the country”. Foothold in Ukraine Two days earlier, the Party of Regions had published a communiqué warning that it could boycott REGIONS the vote if its opponents continued with their “cynical provocations”. The party also brandished c Odessa, the New Epicenter the threat of impeaching Viktor Yushchenko if he opposes a referendum on the status of the Russ- of the Power Struggle bet- ian language and on Ukraine’s neutrality.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights in Ukraine – 2005
    HUMAN RIGHTS IN UKRAINE – 2005 HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS REPORT UKRAINIAN HELSINKI HUMAN RIGHTS UNION KHARKIV HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION GROUP KHARKIV «PRAVA LUDYNY» 2006 1 BBK 67.9(4) H68 In preparing the cover, the work of Alex Savransky «Freedom is on the march» was used Designer Boris Zakharov Editors Yevgeny Zakharov, Irina Rapp, Volodymyr Yavorsky Translator Halya Coynash The book is published with the assistance of the International Renaissance Foundation and the Democracy Fund of the U.S. Embassy, Kyiv The views of the authors do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Government Human Rights in Ukraine – 2005. Report by Human Rights Organizations. / Editors H68 Y.Zakharov, I.Rapp, V.Yavorsky / Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union, Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group – Kharkiv: Prava Ludyny, 2006. – 328 p. ISBN 966-8919-08-4. This book considers the human rights situation in Ukraine during 2005 and is based on studies by various non-governmental human rights organizations and specialists in this area. The first part gives a general assessment of state policy with regard to human rights in 2005, while in the second part each unit concentrates on identifying and analysing violations of specific rights in 2005, as well as discussing any positive moves which were made in protecting the given rights. Current legislation which encour- ages infringements of rights and freedoms is also analyzed, together with draft laws which could change the situation. The conclusions of the research contain recommendations for eliminating
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine and NATO: Deadlock Or Re-Start? Ukraineukraine and and NATO: NATO: Ukraine Has Over the Past Ten Years Developed a Very Close Partnership with NATO
    Ukraine and NATO: Deadlock or Re-start? UkraineUkraine and and NATO: NATO: Ukraine has over the past ten years developed a very close partnership with NATO. Key areas of Deadlock or Re-start? consultation and co-operation include, for instance, peacekeeping operations, and defence and Deadlock or Re-start? security sector reform. NATO’s engagement serves two vital purposes for Ukraine. First, it enhan- Jakob Hedenskog ces Ukraine’s long-term security and serves as a guarantee for the independence of the state; and JAKOB HEDENSKOG second, it promotes and encourages democratic institutionalisation and spreading of democratic norms and values in the country. JAKOB HEDENSKOG Ukraine and NATO: Deadlock or Re-start NATO’s door for Ukraine remains open. The future development of the integration depends on Ukraine’s correspondence to the standards of NATO membership, on the determination of its political leadership, and on an effective mobilisation of public opinion on NATO membership. This report shows that Ukraine has made progress in reaching the standards for NATO membership, especially in the spheres of military contribution and interoperability. However the absence of national consensus and lack of political will and strategic management of the government hamper any effective implementation of Ukraine’s Euro-Atlantic integration. It is also crucial to neutralise Russia’s influence, which seriously hampers Ukraine’s Euro-Atlantic course. Leading representati- ves of the current leadership, especially Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych and his Party of Regions of Ukraine, prefer for the moment continued stable relations with Russia rather than NATO mem- ? bership. Jakob Hedenskog is a security policy analyst at the Swedish Defence Re- search Agency (FOI) specialised on Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Radical Nationalist Parties and Movements in Contemporary Ukraine Before and After Independence: the Right and Its Politics, 1989-1994
    Nationalities Papers, Vol. 25, No. 2, 1997 RADICAL NATIONALIST PARTIES AND MOVEMENTS IN CONTEMPORARY UKRAINE BEFORE AND AFTER INDEPENDENCE: THE RIGHT AND ITS POLITICS, 1989-1994 Taras Kuzio Introduction The radical right in the Ukrainian political spectrum is dominated by three move- ments—the Nationalist Union Ukrainian State Independence (DSU), the Ukrainian National Assembly (UNA, formerly the Ukrainian Inter-Party Assembly, UMPA) and the Congress of Ukrainian Nationalists (KUN). The UNA is dominated by the highly secretive Ukrainian Nationalist Union (UNS) which grew out of the national- ist wing of the Association of Independent Ukrainian Youth (SNUM). The KUN was launched in 1992 in Ukraine as the overt arm of the emigre Organisation of Ukrainian Nationalists-Bandera faction (known commonly as OUN revolutionaries, or OUNr). Other organisations, such as SNUM and the more radical eastern Ukrainian-based Association of Ukrainian Youth (SUM), increasingly adopted "revolutionary nationalism" as their ideology in 1990-1991, with nationalists propagating a "youth cult" to attract the younger generation (both for members and intellectual support).1 It is also often pointed out that Ukrainian nationalism will have a large appeal among the youth of tomorrow.2 Other nationalist groups, though smaller, have also emerged, such as the Ukrainian National-Radical Party (UNRP) and the Organisation for the Liberation of Ukraine,3 but they have remained largely insignificant. The UNRP was established at the end of 1990 in L'viv, joined the Ukrainian Inter-Party Assembly (UMPA) but remained underground. Its leader, Mykhailo Stasiuk, launched the nationalist and widely read journal Derzhavnist in 1991, claiming the highly inflated membership figure of 500 members.4 The Ukrainian National Party (UNP) and the Ukrainian People's Democratic Party (UNDP), the founders of the UMPA, amalga- mated into the Ukrainian National Conservative Party (UNKP) in 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 February 20, 2005
    INSIDE:• Obituary: Dr. Mary V. Beck, political activist — page 4. • Yushchenko addresses students, rectors in Lviv — page 5. • Wine bearing image of Stalin taken off shelves — page 10. Published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal non-profit association Vol. LXXIIITHE UNo.KRAINIAN 8 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, FEBRUARYW 20, 2005 EEKLY$1/$2 in Ukraine New $9by Helen million Smindak Ukrainian Museum in New York is blessed Special to The Ukrainian Weekly NEW YORK – The new $9 million Ukrainian muse- um building that will house and exhibit a rich trove of Ukrainian artifacts received its official blessing on Sunday, February 6. In an exciting prelude to the muse- um’s inaugural opening on April 3, visitors were wel- comed inside the three-story brick and glass structure for the first time since construction was completed last year. There was elation in the air as close to 500 people stood in the street outside the building at 222 E. Sixth St., listening intently as prelates of the Ukrainian Catholic and Ukrainian Orthodox Churches performed blessing rituals near the entrance. Police cars at two positions blocked off motor traffic. Bishop Basil Losten of the Stamford Eparchy of the Ukrainian Catholic Church, and Archbishop Antony of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the U.S.A., concele- brated the blessing with solemn rites and prayers, sprin- kling holy water on the edifice. They were assisted by clergy from local churches: the Revs. Bernard Panczuk and the Mario Dacechen of St. George Ukrainian Catholic Church, the Rev. John Leshyk of St. Volodymyr Ukrainian Orthodox Cathedral, the Revs.
    [Show full text]
  • Tymoshenko Tells US That Ukraine Is In
    INSIDE: • U.S. ambassadors receive honors from Ukraine — page 3. • More on Yulia Tymoshenko’s U.S. visit — pages 4-7. • Music in North America, contemporary art in Kyiv — centerfold. HE KRAINIAN EEKLY T PublishedU by the Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal non-profitW association Vol. LXXV No. 10 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, MARCH 11, 2007 $1/$2 in Ukraine Foreign policy objectives Tymoshenko tells U.S. that Ukraine remain frozen in Ukraine is in “deep constitutional crisis” by Zenon Zawada Russia’s Black Sea Fleet Kyiv Press Bureau The MARS-75 radio-navigation sta- KYIV – Though the Ukrainian winter tion is the latest in repeated refusals by was unusually mild, the country’s foreign the Russian Federation to adhere to policy remained largely frozen in recent Ukrainian court orders requiring that its months, characterized by ongoing government transfer Black Sea Fleet Russian interference and Ukraine’s mini- property to the Ukrainian government. mal progress Westward. Last year, the Sevastopol Economic Russian soldiers on March 5 refused to Court ordered the Russian Federation to allow Ukrainian government officials to transfer control of 77 lighthouses and enter the MARS-75 navigation station in navigational sites to Ukraine’s Ministry the Kherson Oblast in order to deliver a of Defense. Russia never compiled. court order that the soldiers withdraw, in At the MARS-75 station in Henichesk, adherence with Ukrainian law. Russian soldiers are violating the Black Meanwhile, in Brussels, European Sea Fleet arrangement with their pres- leaders continued to keep Kyiv at arm’s ence on Ukrainian territory 200 kilome- length, stressing the need for Ukraine to ters away from their Sevastopol base, join the World Trade Organization, estab- said Oleh Yatsenko, leader of the Student lish a free trade zone and engage in fur- Brotherhood (Studentske Bratstvo).
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 2006, No.45
    www.ukrweekly.com INSIDE:• Court rules against dubbing of films into Ukrainian — page 3. • North American scholarly institutions meet — page 5. • Book by Zbigniew Brzezinski released in Ukrainian — page 9. Published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal non-profit association Vol. LXXIV HE No.KRAINIAN 45 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2006 EEKLY$1/$2 in Ukraine VerkhovnaT RadaU OKs resignations W Ukraine to join WTO no sooner than early 2007, of Ministers Zvarych and Likhovyi by Zenon Zawada Ukraine bloc would enter the opposition, says economyby Zenon Zawada minister inW rebufTO wouldf todecide Yushchenko Ukraine’s member- Kyiv Press Bureau despite President Viktor Yushchenko’s Kyiv Press Bureau ship. urgings to return to the negotiating table. Although Mr. Makukha is an inde- KYIV – Fed up with the Our Ukraine In relieving the two ministers, the KYIV – Ukraine can expect to join the pendent politician, he was appointed to bloc’s political indecisiveness, the coun- Party of the Regions demonstrated that World Trade Organization (WTO) no his post by Prime Minister Viktor try’s coalition government led by the its patience had run out with Our sooner than February 2007, said Minister Yanukovych, the leader of the Party of Party of the Regions let go two of the Ukraine, a political force that it doesn’t of the Economy Volodymyr Makukha, the Regions, which staunchly supports bloc’s ministers from their posts. need because it has enough votes in derailing President Viktor Yushchenko’s pro-Russian cultural and military poli- American-born Minister of Justice Parliament after uniting in a coalition plan to join by late December.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Assembly Assemblée Parlementaire
    Parliamentary Assembly Assemblée parlementaire Committee on Rules of Procedure, Immunities and Institutional Affairs Commission du Règlement, des immunités et des affaires institutionnelles Committee on Rules of Procedure, Immunities and Institutional Affairs Commission du Règlement, des immunités et des affaires institutionnelles AS/Pro (2012) 03 def 24 January 2012 ardoc03_2012 Committee on Rules of Procedure, Immunities and Institutional Affairs Challenge on procedural grounds of the still unratified credentials of the Ukrainian parliamentary delegation Report presented by Mr Egidijus Vareikis, Chairperson, on behalf of the committee A. Opinion to the President of the Parliamentary Assembly 1 1. On 23 January 2012, the still unratified credentials of the parliamentary delegation of Ukraine were challenged on procedural grounds, in accordance with Rule 7 of the Assembly’s Rules of Procedure, on the ground that the composition of the delegation did not satisfy the criterion of fair representation of the political parties or groups. 2. At its meeting on 24 January 2012, the Committee on Rules of Procedure, Immunities and Institutional Affairs examined the various objections raised and established that the Ukrainian delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly was appointed in compliance with Article 25 of the Statute of the Council of Europe and Rule 6 of the Assembly's Rules of Procedure, as regards the fair representation of political parties and groups in the delegation. 3. Consequently, the Committee concludes that the credentials of the Ukrainian parliamentary delegation should be ratified. 4. However, the Committee notes that the list of members of the Ukrainian delegation as transmitted to the President of the Parliamentary Assembly contains misleading information in particular as regards the political affiliation of three members: Mr Valeriy Pysarenko, representative, and MM Oleksandr Feldman and Volodymyr Pylypenko, substitutes, listed as members of the Yuliya Tymoshenko Bloc, actually sit in the parliament under other political labels.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Stage of the Judicial Reform in Ukraine
    NATIONAL SECURITY & DEFENCE CONTENT π 2-3 (139-140) JUDICIAL REFORM IN UKRAINE: CURRENT RESULTS, PROSPECTS AND RISKS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL STAGE 2013 (The Razumkov Centre’s Аnalytycal Report) ......................................................... 2 Founded and published by: 1. COURT WITHIN THE SYSTEM OF STATE GOVERNANCE: INTERNATIONAL NORMS AND STANDARDS .......................................................... 3 INTERNATIONAL NORMS ENSURING THE HUMAN RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL AS WELL AS THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY AS AN IMPORTANT CONDITION FOR ITS IMPLEMENTATION (Annex) .................................................... 9 UKRAINIAN CENTRE FOR ECONOMIC & POLITICAL STUDIES 2. THE 2010 JUDICIAL REFORM: GOALS AND PROGRESS ...........................................15 NAMED AFTER OLEXANDER RAZUMKOV SEQUENCE OF EVENTS THAT PRECEDED THE JUDICIAL REFORM OF 2010 (Annex)... 29 Director General Anatoliy Rachok 3. SECOND (CONSTITUTIONAL) STAGE OF THE JUDICIAL REFORM: Editor Valeriya Klymenko PROSPECTS AND RISKS ..................................................................................... 35 Layout and design Oleksandr Shaptala 4. CONCLUSIONS AND PROPOSALS ........................................................................ 56 Technical support Volodymyr Kekukh EXPERT ASSESSMENTS THE JUDICIAL REFORM AND STATE OF THE JUDICIARY IN UKRAINE ......................... 62 This journal is registered with the State Committee NATIONWIDE SURVEY of Ukraine for Information Policy, COURTS AND JUDICIAL REFORM IN UKRAINE: PUBLIC OPINION ..............................
    [Show full text]