National Tracking Poll 2005100

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

National Tracking Poll 2005100 National Tracking Poll #2005100 May 22-26, 2020 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted from May 22-26, 2020, among a national sample of 1986 Registered Voters. The interviews were conducted online and the data were weighted to approximate a target sample of Registered Voters based on age, race/ethnicity, gender, educational attainment, and region. Results from the full survey have a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points. Table Index 1 Table P1: Now, generally speaking, would you say that things in the country are going in the right direction, or have they pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track? .................. 8 2 Table P3: Now, thinking about your vote, what would you say is the top set of issues on your mind when you cast your vote for federal offices such as U.S. Senate or Congress? . 11 3 Table POL1: Thinking about the November 2020 general election for president, Congress, and statewide offices, how enthusiastic would you say you are in voting in this year’s election? . 15 4 Table POL2: Compared to previous elections, are you more or less enthusiastic about voting than usual? 18 5 Table POL3: And how important do you think the November 2020 general election for president, Congress, and statewide offices will be? .................................. 21 6 Table POL4: Based on what you’ve seen, read, or heard, who do you think will win the November 2020 presidential election? ............................................ 24 7 Table POL5_1: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following issues? The economy . 27 8 Table POL5_2: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following issues? Jobs . 30 9 Table POL5_3: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following issues? Health care . 33 10 Table POL5_4: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following issues? Immigration . 36 11 Table POL5_5: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following issues? The environment . 39 12 Table POL5_6: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following issues? Energy . 42 13 Table POL5_7: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following issues? Education . 45 14 Table POL5_8: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following issues? National security . 48 15 Table POL5_9: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following issues? Sexual harassment and misconduct in the workplace ........................................ 51 16 Table POL5_10: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following issues? Gun policy . 54 17 Table POL5_11: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following issues? Protecting Medicare and Social Security ............................................. 57 18 Table POL5_12: Who do you trust more to handle each of the following issues? Coronavirus . 60 19 Table POL6_1: How important of a priority should each of the following be for Congress? Passing a healthcare reform bill ........................................... 63 20 Table POL6_2: How important of a priority should each of the following be for Congress? Passing a bill to address climate change ....................................... 66 21 Table POL6_3: How important of a priority should each of the following be for Congress? Passing a bill to reduce economic inequality ..................................... 69 2 National Tracking Poll #2005100, May, 2020 22 Table POL6_4: How important of a priority should each of the following be for Congress? Passing an infrastructure spending bill ........................................ 72 23 Table POL6_5: How important of a priority should each of the following be for Congress? Passing an immigration reform bill .......................................... 75 24 Table POL6_6: How important of a priority should each of the following be for Congress? Constructing a wall along the U.S. / Mexico border ................................... 78 25 Table POL6_7: How important of a priority should each of the following be for Congress? Passing a bill that grants young people who were brought to the United States illegally when they were children, often with their parents, protection from deportation ........................... 81 26 Table POL6_8: How important of a priority should each of the following be for Congress? Reducing the federal budget deficit .......................................... 85 27 Table POL6_9: How important of a priority should each of the following be for Congress? Passing legislation placing additional restrictions on gun ownership ....................... 88 28 Table POL6_10: How important of a priority should each of the following be for Congress? Regulating tech companies ............................................... 91 29 Table POL6_11: How important of a priority should each of the following be for Congress? Controlling the spread of the coronavirus in the US .................................. 94 30 Table POL6_12: How important of a priority should each of the following be for Congress? Stimulating the economy to recover from the coronavirus pandemic .......................... 97 31 Table POL7_1: If former Vice President Joe Biden selected each of the following as his vice presidential candidate in the November 2020 presidential election, would you be more likely to vote for him, less likely to vote for him, or would it make no difference in your vote? Stacey Abrams . 100 32 Table POL7_2: If former Vice President Joe Biden selected each of the following as his vice presidential candidate in the November 2020 presidential election, would you be more likely to vote for him, less likely to vote for him, or would it make no difference in your vote? Elizabeth Warren . 104 33 Table POL7_3: If former Vice President Joe Biden selected each of the following as his vice presidential candidate in the November 2020 presidential election, would you be more likely to vote for him, less likely to vote for him, or would it make no difference in your vote? Amy Klobuchar . 108 34 Table POL7_4: If former Vice President Joe Biden selected each of the following as his vice presidential candidate in the November 2020 presidential election, would you be more likely to vote for him, less likely to vote for him, or would it make no difference in your vote? Kamala Harris . 112 35 Table POL7_5: If former Vice President Joe Biden selected each of the following as his vice presidential candidate in the November 2020 presidential election, would you be more likely to vote for him, less likely to vote for him, or would it make no difference in your vote? Gretchen Whitmer . 116 36 Table POL7_6: If former Vice President Joe Biden selected each of the following as his vice presidential candidate in the November 2020 presidential election, would you be more likely to vote for him, less likely to vote for him, or would it make no difference in your vote? Tammy Baldwin . 120 3 Morning Consult 37 Table POL7_7: If former Vice President Joe Biden selected each of the following as his vice presidential candidate in the November 2020 presidential election, would you be more likely to vote for him, less likely to vote for him, or would it make no difference in your vote? Catherine Cortez Masto . 124 38 Table POL7_8: If former Vice President Joe Biden selected each of the following as his vice presidential candidate in the November 2020 presidential election, would you be more likely to vote for him, less likely to vote for him, or would it make no difference in your vote? Val Demings . 128 39 Table POL7_9: If former Vice President Joe Biden selected each of the following as his vice presidential candidate in the November 2020 presidential election, would you be more likely to vote for him, less likely to vote for him, or would it make no difference in your vote? Michelle Lujan Grisham . 132 40 Table POL8_1: How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coronavirus? Presi- dent Donald Trump ............................................136 41 Table POL8_2: How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coronavirus? Vice President Mike Pence ...........................................139 42 Table POL8_3: How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coronavirus? Congress142 43 Table POL8_4: How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coronavirus? Con- gressional Democrats ...........................................145 44 Table POL8_5: How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coronavirus? Con- gressional Republicans ...........................................148 45 Table POL8_6: How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coronavirus? The World Health Organization (WHO) ....................................151 46 Table POL8_7: How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coronavirus? The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) ............................154 47 Table POL8_8: How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coronavirus? Your state’s governor ...............................................157 48 Table POL8_9: How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coronavirus? Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases . 160 49 Table POL9_1: Based on what you’ve seen, read, or heard, do you think each of the following has done too much, not enough, or the right amount in response to the coronavirus outbreak? The Trump administration ...............................................163 50 Table POL9_2: Based on what you’ve seen, read, or heard, do you think each of the following has done too much, not enough, or the right amount in response to the coronavirus outbreak? The WHO (World Health Organization) ...........................................167 51 Table POL9_3: Based on what you’ve seen, read, or heard, do you think each of the following has done too much, not enough, or the right amount in response to the coronavirus outbreak? The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) ..................................171 52 Table POL9_4: Based on what you’ve seen, read, or heard, do you think each of the following has done too much, not enough, or the right amount in response to the coronavirus outbreak? Congress .
Recommended publications
  • Biden's Agenda and Indiana Needs
    V26, N2 Thursday, Aug. 20, 2020 Biden’s agenda and Indiana needs to evolve, too, with HPI analyzes Dem’s additional steps to come so that we agenda; Harris’s meet the growing economic shocks. idealogical moorings We must prepare By BRIAN A. HOWEY now to take further INDIANAPOLIS – With Joe decisive action, in- Biden accepting the Democratic cluding direct relief, presidential nomination tonight, that will be large in Howey Politics Indiana reviewed his scale and focused campaign’s policy positions. We will on the broader do the same with President Trump health and stability and Vice President Pence next week of our economy.” during the virtual Republican Na- He added, “The tional Convention. American people Two areas that could have deserve an urgent, a major impact in Indiana are his robust, and profes- proposed pandemic response, and sional response to how the former vice president and the growing public senator will approach the epidemic health and economic that has receded from public view crisis caused by the over the past six months, the one coronavirus (CO- dealing with opioids. VID-19) outbreak. On the pandemic, Biden Continued on page 3 said, “This is an evolving crisis and the response will need Holcomb and race By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – By any measure, Gov. Eric Holcomb’s mid-day address on Tuesday was extraordinary. Stating that Indiana stands at an “inflection point” and promising Hoosiers that he is prepared to become a racial “Donald Trump hasn’t grown “barrier buster,” the governor traced the nation’s racially charged lineage from Thomas Jefferson’s “Declaration of into the job because he can’t.
    [Show full text]
  • This Table Was Generated on 3/24/21. ID # Committee Name Total
    This table was generated on 3/24/21. PAC Table 3a* Independent Expenditure-Only Political Committees (Super PACs) January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2020 Closing ID # Committee Name Total Receipts Total Disbursements Total IEs Made Debts Owed Cash on Hand C00571703 SENATE LEADERSHIP FUND $475,353,507 $476,355,109 $293,723,598 $0 $5,166,674 C00484642 SMP $372,293,747 $372,290,232 $229,911,901 $5,000,000 $406,686 C00504530 CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUND $165,741,326 $165,923,057 $142,784,335 $0 $409,100 C00637512 AMERICA FIRST ACTION, INC. $150,128,473 $149,372,836 $133,820,069 $0 $3,318,486 C00756882 PRESERVE AMERICA PAC $105,322,042 $104,430,334 $102,983,484 $0 $891,709 C00487363 AMERICAN CROSSROADS $81,809,711 $83,373,696 $79,476,089 $0 $137,498 C00487470 CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION $71,990,842 $71,233,305 $65,439,435 $0 $1,259,660 C00492140 AB PAC $85,463,766 $84,733,025 $59,719,707 $101,645 $877,636 C00532705 INDEPENDENCE USA PAC $67,713,621 $68,024,060 $56,530,454 $96,837 $188,579 C00725820 THE LINCOLN PROJECT $87,404,908 $81,956,298 $49,186,930 $73,778 $5,448,609 C00687103 AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ACTION, INC.(AFP AC $60,382,095 $60,576,641 $47,633,481 $1,231,653 $2,340,817 C00486845 LCV VICTORY FUND $61,134,693 $61,173,937 $42,267,573 $0 $151,596 C00701888 UNITE THE COUNTRY $49,938,340 $48,980,275 $38,923,630 $0 $958,065 C00762377 PEACHTREE PAC $38,000,000 $37,945,073 $37,845,512 $0 $54,927 C00473918 WOMEN VOTE! $46,750,933 $46,927,077 $36,769,794 $0 $46,096 C00609388 BLACK PAC $44,044,054 $42,039,018 $31,783,484 $512,944 $2,352,147 C00688655 EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY VICTORY FUND (EVE$32,396,481 $32,309,097 $21,202,308 $6,618 $87,797 C00571588 RESTORATION PAC $25,107,533 $24,158,040 $19,777,020 $0 $1,834,748 C00741710 NRA VICTORY FUND, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Analysis of the US Election: August 2020 Insights from Pressrelations 2020 Introduction
    2020 Media Analysis of the US Election: August 2020 Insights from pressrelations 2020 Introduction In cooperation with the Fraunhofer Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics FKIE and NewsGuard, pressrelations is conducting am in-depth media analysis that sheds light on the role of disinformation in the 2020 US election. Time window of the qualitative analysis Link to the InfoBoard The basis for this quantitative, fully automated media analysis is formed by 426 online media sources from five countries. The data from 16 of those media sources was coded by pressrelations analysts, according to qualitative criteria. The selected media sources included eight US media sources and eight online media sources from Germany, Austria and Switzerland (D-A-CH), which were analyzed for the period from August 1 to August 31, 2020. In addition, TV coverage of CNN, FOX News and ARD was examined. 9/24/2020 PAGE 2 2020 Methodology This analysis includes the assessment and mapping of the media landscape from different perspectives and is based on extensive data collection from media reports made public on the Internet or on TV channels. The amount of news about the 2020 US election campaign is immense. The volume of articles therefore made it necessary to restrict the media set to a few select media sources. The selection of media was based on the potential reach and the volume of contributions of the respective sources. Despite this restriction, a total of 13,203 posts were coded in August alone. All articles that addressed at least one of the four candidates running for the American presidency and vice presidency were examined.
    [Show full text]
  • Friday, July 10Th, 2020 TO: Interested Parties FROM: Reed Galen RE: State of the Race “Over These Next 11 Months, Our Efforts
    Friday, July 10th, 2020 TO: Interested Parties FROM: Reed Galen RE: State of the Race “Over these next 11 months, our efforts will be dedicated to defeating President Trump and Trumpism at the ballot box and to elect those patriots who will hold the line. We do not undertake this task lightly, nor from ideological preference. We have been, and remain, broadly conservative (or classically liberal) in our politics and outlooks. Our many policy differences with national Democrats remain, but our shared fidelity to the Constitution dictates a common effort.” The Lincoln Project The New York Times December 17, 2019 The Lincoln Project launched six months ago in a different time and place in America. The country was preparing to experience its third impeachment trial in the history of the United States. The impeachment of President Donald J. Trump for abuse of power ended in political farce as Mitch McConnell and his supine Senate majority looked away from the clear evidence that President Trump had extorted a foreign government to assist his re-election. It is in that context, and the previous three years of Trump’s administration that The Lincoln Project began its efforts with a clear message: To rid American politics of Donald Trump and Trumpism in the November general election. At that moment, saving the Republic from the worst of Trump’s behavior was paramount. That goal was ambitious, but we knew even then that it would be an uphill fight. As the coronavirus made its way to our shores, Donald Trump’s inability to lead changed our outlook on how to conduct our efforts against him.
    [Show full text]
  • Dupree Pleads to Dealing Meth
    SPORTS COOK OF THE WEEK NESHOBA CENTRAL LADY LEONE INFLUENCED ROCKETS READY FOR TOURNEY BY GRANDMOTHER Basketball — Page 4B Alexis Leone — Page 1B Established 1881 — Oldest Business Institution in Neshoba County Philadelphia, Mississippi Wednesday, February 17, 2021 140th Year No. 7 **$1.00 FACING LIFE IN PRISON Dupree pleads to dealing meth By DUNCAN DENT Acting Special Agent in the result of an exten- nation’s primary tool felony pursuit, expired license Mississippi Bureau of Nar- [email protected] Charge of U.S. Immigration sive investigation, for disrupting and dis- tag, suspended driver's license, cotics, with assistance from and Customs Enforcement’s dubbed “Operation mantling major drug no insurance, possession of Drug Enforcement Adminis- A Philadelphia man has Homeland Security Investiga- Highlife,” which trafficking organiza- marijuana, vehicle, improper tration, Bureau of Alcohol, pleaded guilty to federal tions in New Orleans. began as an operation tions, targeting license tag- altered, possession Tobacco, Firearms and Explo- charges of possession with Although Dupree had pre- targeting illegal nar- national and regional of a controlled substance. He sives, Philadelphia Police intent to distribute metham- viously been convicted of sell- cotics distribution in level drug trafficking faced felony possession of a Department, Neshoba County phetamine and faces life in ing cocaine in Neshoba Coun- central Mississippi that organizations, and firearm in 2005. And in 2013 Sheriff’s Department, Nesho- prison, the Justice Department ty, he again sold and distrib- involved the distribu- Landon coordinating the nec- faced charges of conspiracy to ba County District Attorney’s announced. uted drugs (methampheta- tion of methampheta- essary law enforcement commit murder.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LINCOLN PROJECT Embargoed For: Contact
    THE LINCOLN PROJECT Embargoed for: Contact: Tuesday, May, 12, 2020 Keith Edwards, 646-334-7929, [email protected] Press Release / Media Availability The Lincoln Project Expands Viral Ad "Mourning In America" to Target More Voters in Swing States: Ohio, Florida, and Wisconsin Tues., May 12, 2020 — The Lincoln Project today expanded the ad buy for “Mourning in America” — which so far has generated more than 20 million impressions among voters and the ire of President Trump — to four more cities, in three swing states. “Mourning in America" contrasts Ronald Reagan's 1984 iconic and optimistic political ad "Morning in America" with the devastation brought on by the Trump presidency. This next ad buy by the Lincoln Project will target voters in Wausau, WI; La Crosse WI; Columbus, OH; and Fort Meyers, FL. The Lincoln Project founders George Conway, Reed Galen, Jennifer Horn, Mike Madrid, Ron Steslow, John Weaver, Rick Wilson, Sarah Lenti, are available for comment. In 1984 Ronald Reagan’s campaign launched an iconic and memorable political ad called “Morning in America.” ‘Morning’ highlighted the positive impact of a first term Reagan presidency and presented an optimistic vision of an America that was prosperous and peaceful. Under Donald Trump, we instead face “Mourning in America.” “The Lincoln Project video highlights the effects of President Trump’s failure as a President and how he’s left the nation weaker, sicker, and teetering on the verge of a new Great Depression. In a time of deep suffering and loss, Donald Trump continues with his failed leadership and his inability to put the country before himself,” said Jennifer Horn, co-founder of The Lincoln Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Times: Diehard Trump Republicans on Collision Course
    Diehard Trump Republicans on collision course with US business Companies reconsider support and funding for politicians who back overturning of election result Diehard Trump Republicans on collision course with US business | Financial Times (ft.com) Andrew Edgecliffe-Johnson in New York and James Politi and Courtney Weaver in Washington Wednesday, January 6, 2021 Republicans supporting Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the election are on a collision course with US business leaders, as companies reconsider support and funding for politicians they deem to be a threat to national stability. The decision by 13 Republican senators to join most House Republicans in refusing to certify Joe Biden’s victory on Wednesday was quickly denounced by business groups, whose leaders voiced alarm at the threat it posed to a democracy that most had taken for granted. Their action “undermines our democracy and the rule of law”, warned the US Chamber of Commerce, as a small business coalition blasted the “shameful complicity” of elected officials trying to help Mr Trump “undermine the will of the voters”. Attempts to thwart the orderly transfer of power to Mr Biden ran “counter to the essential tenets of our democracy”, added more than 180 New York executives including Accenture’s Julie Sweet, BlackRock’s Larry Fink and KKR’s Henry Kravis. Pointedly, several of the statements argued that indulging baseless conspiracy theories — including that Mr Biden only won thanks to mass voter fraud — was bad for business at a time when executives want Washington to tackle the economic fallout from Covid-19. Sowing further distrust in the political system “threatens the economic recovery .
    [Show full text]
  • Embracing Creative Transience: from Political Remix Video to Digital Collage
    Media-N | The Journal of the New Media Caucus Winter 2021: Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 99–129 Media-N | ISSN: 1942-017X Embracing Creative Transience: From Political Remix Video to Digital Collage DIRAN LYONS Assistant Professor, Porterville College ABSTRACT In this essay, I explore my latest series of digital collages titled Notes and Narratives. These works utilize additive, subtractive, and substitutive remix strategies to integrate Gothic, Renaissance, and Baroque paintings with visages of Donald Trump and his associates. The series appropriates historical masterworks to interrelate the theologico-political foundations of the original paintings with the political turbulence experienced under the Trump administration. Notes and Narratives foregrounds remix as a powerful and potent tool for disruption, change, and communication in the continuum of pedagogic praxes and remix studies. My previous artistic work was dedicated to creating political remix videos, and this body of work represents a fork in my creative practice. The immediacy of the collages draws upon intertextuality and remix strategies to reveal passionate polemical positions, positing contentious criticisms of the political leadership in the United States. INTRODUCTION I encountered Jorge Luis Borges’s short story “The Garden of Forking Paths” for the first time in 2003, while pursuing graduate studies in the Department of Art at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Borges’s ideas were routinely integrated into discussions about interactive digital media, video art, and film studies. Many of the UCSB faculty shared a scholarly fascination with, if not fervent commitment to, a philosophical lexicon derived from thinkers like Leibniz, Nietzsche, and Deleuze that explores a reverberant interconnectivity of time, events, and the immanence of creative potential.
    [Show full text]
  • Michelle Hackman, Wall Street Journal Shirley Hoogstra, Council for Christian Colleges & Universities Robert P
    LEADING THE WAY An American Approach to Immigration Monday, November 16 to Thursday, November 19, 2020 3-5pm EST A Virtual Convening OUR VISION The National Immigration Forum is a non-partisan advocacy organization, building trusted relationships to create a shared vision for immigration in America. Our innovative approach leads the conversation on the value of immigration for a stronger, richer, and more vibrant America. MAKING IMPACT We are a forum We activate people We are creating a 21st century immigration system We lead, convene, and guide a Through media and events, we meaningful immigration debate, gather thinkers, leaders, We develop and advance innovative with the purpose of influencing policy-makers, legislators, immigration policy solutions that policy. and everyday people to take action serve the needs of the American to advance informed immigration worker and their family. policy. IMPACT 2019 20,964 357 250+ Faith, Law Enforcement Events Meetings with and Business Leaders Members of Congress 300+ 1.5 million businesses employees LEADING THE WAY November 16-19, 2020 | A Virtual Convening Leading the Way will bring together an exclusive group of moderate and conservative faith, law enforcement, and business leaders to network, advocate, and hear from high profile, influential leaders about the role of immigrants and immigration in America. We invite you to join them. Two hours of This year’s panels: interactive virtual Day 1: Monday, November 16th Election 2020 and the Path Forward sessions over 4 days – Day 2: Tuesday, November 17th allowing for an The New American Identity expanded audience. Day 3: Wednesday, November 18th The New Economics of Immigration Day 4: Thursday, November 19th The Ones to Watch 2020 CONFIRMED SPEAKERS & MODERATORS Mindy Belz, World News Group Michael A.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Financial Stewardship Report
    2020 STEWARDSHIP REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER FROM THE TRANSITION ADVISORY COMMITTEE 03 OUR BEGINNINGS 05 OUR STRATEGY 07 OUR CASE STUDIES 10 OUR OWNED CHANNELS 14 OUR DONORS 22 OUR FUTURE 24 OUR FINANCIAL DETAILS 28 2 0 LETTER FROM THE TRANSITION ADVISORY COMMITTEE The Lincoln Project has played an outsized role in confronting Trump and Trumpism in Although Donald Trump was defeated, the threat of Trumpism still lingers – necessitating America – taking an unconventional approach to voter engagement, content production, the continuation of The Lincoln Project’s mission. Given the organization’s past success and even using an "audience of one" strategy. In an election post-mortem, Trump’s own and present reach, the Transition Advisory Committee has recommended implementing pollster credited Trump’s defeat to the groups targeted by The Lincoln Project: college- new measures, including the creation of a new Financial Comptroller position that will educated voters, Independents and soft Republicans. provide focused assistance with oversight over financial processes at The Lincoln Project, the establishment of a new Donor Advisory Committee selected by the Board of Directors As part of its ongoing governance and operational review, The Lincoln Project Board of to offer advice and counsel for the organization, and the issuance of an Annual Report, in Directors formed the Transition Advisory Committee to help strengthen the organization’s addition to the internal operational changes already underway at The Lincoln Project prior management and operations. One of the responsibilities the Committee has been tasked to the commissioning of the Committee. with is the production and distribution of this Financial Stewardship Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 117 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 117 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 167 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, MARCH 1, 2021 No. 38 House of Representatives The House met at noon and was resources, a history founded on faith in REPLANT ACT IS PRACTICAL called to order by the Speaker pro tem- You and invested in the noble prin- LEGISLATION pore (Mr. BEYER). ciples of the American experiment. (Mr. PANETTA asked and was given f And yet, we confess that we have al- permission to address the House for 1 lowed these endowments to be de- minute and to revise and extend his re- DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO stroyed by moths of malice and mis- TEMPORE marks.) direction. We acknowledge before You Mr. PANETTA. Madam Speaker, The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- that we have tolerated and even taken what I am about to show you are the fore the House the following commu- delight in the corrosive rust of rival- examples of the cycle of destruction nication from the Speaker: ries and debate. from the climate crisis in my home dis- WASHINGTON, DC, Forgive us for taking for granted the trict on the central coast of California. March 1, 2021. precious gifts of life, liberty, and hap- Last year, my district was victim to I hereby appoint the Honorable DONALD S. piness, and letting them slip from our a brutal wildfire season in which al- BEYER, Jr. to act as Speaker pro tempore on care, only to be stolen by pride and most 650,000 acres were burned.
    [Show full text]
  • Studying the Memers Among Trump Supporters in the 2020 US Presidential Election on Twitter Via Hashtags #Maga and #Trump2020
    “Make A-meme-rica great again!”: Studying the memers among Trump supporters in the 2020 US presidential election on Twitter via hashtags #maga and #trump2020 by Huu Dat Tran B.S., Vietnam National University in Ho Chi Minh City, 2018 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE A.Q. Miller School of Journalism and Mass Communications College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2021 Approved by: Major Professor Jacob Groshek, PhD. Copyright © Huu Dat Tran 2021. Abstract The study, consisting of three parts and based on the theoretical framework of social network analysis, political spamming, and framing theory, analysed a corpus of 220,336 tweets from 96,820 unique users posted on Twitter between October 27 and November 2, 2020. It investigates the participation of social media, particularly Twitter, and internet memes in political discourse, positioning such concepts in the political context of the 2020 US presidential election. The study attempts to better understand Donald Trump, his community of supporters, and their political discourse and activities during the 2020 US presidential election; thus, an investigation into their Twitter social network should prove fruitful. By probing into the community of supporters of the incumbent Donald Trump, specifically the group of internet memers (an internet slang describing people who create or distribute memes), on Twitter during the 2020 US presidential election, the study reveals the most active and influential users within the network, the likelihood of those users being spamming bots, and their tweets’ content. Such analysis is relevant in understanding Twitter users related to the hashtags, their affiliations, and the nature of such accounts.
    [Show full text]