DOCSLIB.ORG

Archived Content Contenu Archivé

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Archived Content Contenu Archivé ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. The Myth of Security at Canada’s Airports Report of the Standing Senate Committee on National Security and Defence Committee Members Sen. Colin Kenny – Chair Sen. J. Michael Forrestall – Deputy Chair Sen. Norman K. Atkins Sen. Tommy Banks Sen. Jane Cordy Sen. Joseph A. Day Sen. Michael A. Meighen Sen. David P. Smith, P.C. Sen. John (Jack) Wiebe Second Session Thirty-Seventh Parliament January 2003 (Ce rapport est disponible en français) Information regarding the Committee can be obtained through its web site: www.senate-senat.ca/defence.asp Questions can be directed to: Toll free: 1-800-267-7362 Or via e-mail: The Committee Clerk: [email protected] The Committee Chair: [email protected] Media inquiries can be directed to: [email protected] The Myth of Security at Canada’s Airports Standing Senate Committee on National Security and Defence January 2003 MEMBERSHIP 37th Parliament – 2nd Session STANDING COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL SECURITY AND DEFENCE The Honourable Colin Kenny, Chair The Honourable J. Michael Forrestall, Deputy Chair And The Honourable Senators: Atkins Banks Cordy Day Meighen Smith, P.C. Wiebe *Carstairs, P.C. (or Robichaud, P.C.) *Lynch-Staunton (or Kinsella) *Ex Officio Members TABLE OF CONTENTS PLASTIC KNIVES DON’T CUT IT.............................................. 6 SYMBOLISM AND REALITY ....................................................... 7 IS YOUR MONEY BEING WISELY INVESTED? ..................... 8 OUT OF SIGHT, OUT OF MIND ................................................. 9 LOOSE LIPS SINK SHIPS............................................................ 11 CANADIANS SHOULD KNOW WHAT THE BAD GUYS KNOW ................................................ 13 I. TRAINING AIR CREW, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS OFFICIALS, AND MAINTENANCE STAFF TO DEAL WITH POTENTIAL THREATS....................................... 15 IS WHAT YOU SEE WHAT YOU GET? ............................................. 16 CREWS WANT TRAINING, NOT A WING AND A PRAYER............... 18 TO DEAL WITH THE PROBLEMS OUTLINED IN SECTION I, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS: ....................................... 25 II. IMPROVING IN-FLIGHT SECURITY ................................ 27 INFORMED FLIGHT CREWS.............................................................. 27 THE WHOLE TEAM MUST KNOW ................................................... 28 LET’S ROLL TOGETHER ................................................................... 30 SECURING COCKPIT DOORS............................................................ 30 TO DEAL WITH THE PROBLEMS OUTLINED IN SECTION II, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS: ....................................... 35 III. DEALING WITH POTENTIAL THREATS CONCEALED IN CHECKED BAGGAGE, PARCELS AND MAIL................ 37 The Myth of Security at Canada’s Airports CHECKED BAGGAGE ....................................................................... 38 SNIFFING OUT TROUBLE ................................................................. 40 CANADA TWO YEARS BEHIND ....................................................... 41 MAIL AND PACKAGES..................................................................... 43 WHY SHOULD MAIL BE EXEMPT? .................................................. 47 TO DEAL WITH THE PROBLEMS OUTLINED IN SECTION III, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS: ....................................... 55 IV. DEALING WITH THE THREAT OF UNDERCOVER TERRORISTS OPERATING INSIDE A TERMINAL............. 57 GOOD APPLES AND BAD................................................................. 59 FRONT TIGHT, BACK SLACK ........................................................... 60 HOW SECURITY CHECKS WORK. SOMETIMES. ............................... 62 HAIL MARY PASSES ........................................................................ 63 IS THIS A SECURITY CULTURE? ....................................................... 65 “RANDOM” MEANS WILLY-NILLY ................................................ 67 TO DEAL WITH THE PROBLEMS OUTLINED IN SECTION IV, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS: ....................................... 75 V. DEALING WITH THE THREAT OF SUBVERSIVES OPERATING FROM THE OUTSKIRTS OF THE AIRPORT........77 AIRPORT NEIGHBOURS WITH NEIGHBOURLY ACCESS TO RAMPS AND RUNWAYS................................................ 80 PRIVATE AIRCRAFT ......................................................................... 83 MAIL CARRIERS, FREIGHT FORWARDERS ....................................... 86 TO DEAL WITH THE PROBLEMS OUTLINED IN SECTION V, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS: ....................................... 91 VI. DEALING WITH THE THREAT OF TERRORISTS ATTACKING AIRCRAFT FROM BEYOND THE PERIMETER OF AN AIRPORT................................................... 93 2 The Myth of Security at Canada’s Airports VII. IMPROVING AIRPORT POLICING................................ 97 THREATS GROW, POLICE SHRINK................................................... 99 ONE FORCE FOR AIRPORT SECURITY? .......................................... 100 TO DEAL WITH THE PROBLEMS OUTLINED IN SECTION VII, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS: ..................................... 107 VIII. IMPROVING THE GOVERNANCE OF CANADA’S AIRWAYS....................................................................................... 109 THE SHELL GAME ......................................................................... 111 THE ROLE OF CATSA................................................................... 113 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CATSA AND TRANSPORT CANADA ....................................................................................................... 117 TURF WARS OVER SECURITY......................................................... 120 TO DEAL WITH THE PROBLEMS OUTLINED IN SECTION VIII, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS: ..................................... 125 IX. ASSURING FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY ............. 127 WHAT ARE LOCAL AIRPORT AUTHORITIES SPENDING ON SECURITY? ..................................................................................... 130 TO DEAL WITH THE ISSUES RAISED IN SECTION IX, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS: ..................................... 135 X. THE NEED FOR A NEW TRANSPARENCY.................... 137 RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT IS PREDICATED ON THE PUBLIC’S RIGHT TO KNOW ........................................................................... 138 HONEST PEOPLE CAME FORWARD............................................... 139 TO DEAL WITH THE ISSUES RAISED IN SECTION X, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS: ..................................... 141 3 The Myth of Security at Canada’s Airports RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................. 143 ORDER OF REFERENCE.......................................................... 151 WHO THE COMMITTEE HEARD FROM............................. 153 WHO WE SAW AND WHAT WE HEARD........................... 158 SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS ................................................. 166 SECURITY RESPONSIBILITIES AT PEARSON AIRPORT. 170 GREATER TORONTO AIRPORT AUTHORITY .................. 173 LEGAL OPINIONS PROVIDED TO THE COMMITTEE .... 186 PEEL REGIONAL POLICE SERVICE..................................... 190 EXHIBITS..................................................................................... 191 STATISTICS................................................................................. 194 MEDIA ACTIVITIES.................................................................. 196 BIOGRAPHIES OF MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE....... 198 BIOGRAPHIES OF COMMITTEE SECRETARIAT .............. 213 INDEX ............................................................................................. 223 4 The Myth of Security at Canada’s Airports “You take away a hat pin, you take away some nail clippers, and everybody leaves the airport saying “Oh, isn’t that wonderful, they are so zealous . we don’t have to worry. And it is all nonsense. Absolute nonsense.” Aviation Company Owner “The current status of airport security is not very good. I could take anyone in this room in two minutes and train you on how to put a bomb on an airplane for any city in the world. If you are willing to pay the first-duty shipping fee, we can guarantee what flight you will be on – it
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Debates of the Senate
    CANADA Debates of the Senate 3rd SESSION . 40th PARLIAMENT . VOLUME 147 . NUMBER 74 OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, December 7, 2010 ^ THE HONOURABLE NOËL A. KINSELLA SPEAKER CONTENTS (Daily index of proceedings appears at back of this issue). Debates Services: D'Arcy McPherson, National Press Building, Room 906, Tel. 613-995-5756 Publications Centre: David Reeves, National Press Building, Room 926, Tel. 613-947-0609 Published by the Senate Available from PWGSC ± Publishing and Depository Services, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0S5. Also available on the Internet: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1504 THE SENATE Tuesday, December 7, 2010 The Senate met at 2 p.m., the Speaker in the chair. Diefenbaker. That was when I first met Hugh John Flemming. It was the first in a long string of campaigns for Norman. Most of Prayers. them resulted in great successes, although as Senator Meighen can attest, not all of them did. VISITORS IN THE GALLERY Honourable senators, it is impossible to hear the words ``Big Blue Machine'' and not think of Norman Atkins. He was The Hon. the Speaker: Honourable senators, I wish to draw National Campaign Chair for former Prime Minister the Right your attention to the presence in the gallery of family and friends Honourable Brian Mulroney, who produced two majority of former Senator Atkins, including his beloved partner, Mary governments in 1984 and 1988. He also brought his LeBlanc; his sons, Peter, Geoffrey and Mark; and other members considerable talents to the campaigns of the Right Honourable of his family and friends. Robert Stanfield, former Ontario Premier William Davis and former Manitoba Premier Duff Roblin.
    [Show full text]
  • Report EN Intro
    Defence of North America: A Canadian Responsibility Report of the Standing Senate Committee on National Security and Defence Chair The Honourable Colin Kenny Deputy Chair The Honourable J. Michael Forrestall September 2002 MEMBERSHIP 37th Parliament - 1st Session THE STANDING SENATE COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL SECURITY AND DEFENCE The Honourable Colin Kenny, Chair The Honourable J. Michael Forrestall, Deputy Chair And The Honourable Senators: Atkins Banks *Carstairs, P.C. (or Robichaud, P.C.) Cordy Day LaPierre *Lynch-Staunton (or Kinsella) Meighen Wiebe *Ex Officio Members The following Senators also served on the Committee during its study: The Honourable Senators Baker and Taylor. -------------------- DEFENCE OF NORTH AMERICA: A CANADIAN RESPONSIBILITY TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.............................................................................. 5 NORAD Stands Alone...................................................... 5 National Policy Needed..................................................... 6 Canada’s Self-Interest....................................................... 6 Efficient Use of Resources................................................ 7 PART I DEFENDING CANADA’S COASTS................................................. 9 Coastal Challenges ........................................................... 9 Ad Hoc Policing..............................................................10 Improving Both Planning and Operational Capacity ..........11 RECOMMENDATIONS: Defence of Canada’s Territorial Waters .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Debates of the Senate
    CANADA Debates of the Senate 3rd SESSION . 40th PARLIAMENT . VOLUME 147 . NUMBER 92 OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, March 8, 2011 ^ THE HONOURABLE NOËL A. KINSELLA SPEAKER CONTENTS (Daily index of proceedings appears at back of this issue). Debates Services: D'Arcy McPherson, National Press Building, Room 906, Tel. 613-995-5756 Publications Centre: David Reeves, National Press Building, Room 926, Tel. 613-947-0609 Published by the Senate Available from PWGSC ± Publishing and Depository Services, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0S5. Also available on the Internet: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1937 THE SENATE Tuesday, March 8, 2011 The Senate met at 2 p.m., the Speaker in the chair. the vote, especially in his beloved Toronto — to advising prime ministers and planning grand national campaigns. He never lost Prayers. perspective on himself or what he was doing. Keith Davey was a man of rock-solid convictions and, above SENATORS' STATEMENTS all, of great loyalty and dedication to the Liberal Party of Canada, to the many prime ministers he served, to the Yankees, the Blue Jays and even the Maple Leafs. VISITORS IN THE GALLERY Senator Davey's warmth was enveloping. The many obituaries The Hon. the Speaker: Honourable senators, I wish to draw and eulogies from across the political spectrum attest to the deep your attention to the presence in the gallery of Mrs. Dorothy and genuine respect and affection that so many Canadians had Davey and family members of our former colleague, the for him. One headline expressed this particularly well: ``Rain he Honourable Senator Keith Davey. made, sunshine he gave.'' On behalf of all honourable senators, welcome to the Senate of Keith Davey had an extraordinary gift for finding talented Canada and thank you for being here as we move to tributes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Elected Women on Parliamentary Debate and Policymaking in Canada
    Women in the House: The Impact of Elected Women on Parliamentary Debate and Policymaking in Canada by Erica Jane Rayment A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Political Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Erica Jane Rayment 2020 Abstract Women in the House: The Impact of Elected Women on Parliamentary Debate and Policymaking in Canada Doctor of Philosophy, 2020 Erica Jane Rayment Graduate Department of Political Science University of Toronto This study examines the impact of elected women in Canada on patterns and processes of parliamentary debate and policymaking from 1968 to 2015. It argues that women’s presence in parliament matters for the substantive representation of women, particularly under conditions of threat to women’s equality. The study refines core concepts in the literature on women’s political representation to explain how the substantive representation of women occurs in Canadian parliamentary institutions. It disaggregates the concept of substantive representation and expands the scope of the critical actors framework to include actions that defend women’s equality against regressive policy initiatives. Building on these refinements, the study argues that gender is a key factor in determining whether an MP will represent women in parliamentary debate, but the institutional role MPs occupy and the political context in which they operate influence the mechanisms they use to advocate for women’s equality in policymaking and their chances of success. Through an automated analysis of the content of nearly 50 years of parliamentary debate, the study finds that women MPs, regardless of party affiliation, are consistently more likely than their male colleagues to make representative claims about women.
    [Show full text]
  • Debates of the Senate
    CANADA Debates of the Senate 2nd SESSION . 40th PARLIAMENT . VOLUME 146 . NUMBER 41 OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, June 3, 2009 ^ THE HONOURABLE NOËL A. KINSELLA SPEAKER CONTENTS (Daily index of proceedings appears at back of this issue). Debates Service: D'Arcy McPherson, Chambers Building, Room 943, Tel. 613-995-5756 Publications Centre: David Reeves, Chambers Building, Room 969, Tel. 613-947-0609 Published by the Senate Available from PWGSC ± Publishing and Depository Services, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0S5. Also available on the Internet: http://www.parl.gc.ca 974 THE SENATE Wednesday, June 3, 2009 The Senate met at 1:30 p.m., the Speaker in the chair. provincial election. This election resulted in a great victory for the Progressive Conservative party led by Hugh John Flemming who Prayers. was later elected to Parliament and served in the cabinet of the Right Honourable John George Diefenbaker. For Norman, this was the beginning of a lifetime in politics, in more federal and DISTINGUISHED VISITORS IN THE GALLERY provincial elections than he can probably count — although I bet he can count them. The Hon. the Speaker: Honourable senators, before calling for Senators' Statements, I wish to draw your attention to the presence in the gallery of the Honourable Dan Hays, my All honourable senators know of his long and accomplished predecessor as Speaker of the Senate of Canada; the career behind the scenes and on the front lines of Canadian Honourable Mabel DeWare; the Honourable Erminie Cohen; political life well before he came to this place. He served as a and the Honourable Alasdair Graham.
    [Show full text]
  • SUCESIÓN Y BALANCE DE PODER EN CANADÁ ENTRE GOBIERNOS LIBERALES Y CONSERVADORES Administraciones Y Procesos Partidistas Internos (1980-2011)
    SUCESIÓN Y BALANCE DE PODER EN CANADÁ ENTRE GOBIERNOS LIBERALES Y CONSERVADORES Administraciones y procesos partidistas internos (1980-2011) COORDINACIÓN DE HUMANIDADES CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIONES SOBRE AMÉRICA DEL NORTE UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO SUCESIÓN Y BALANCE DE PODER EN CANADÁ ENTRE GOBIERNOS LIBERALES Y CONSERVADORES Administraciones y procesos partidistas internos (1980-2011) Oliver Santín Peña UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO Centro de Investigaciones sobre América del Norte México, 2014 Primera edición, 20 de octubre de 2014 D.R. © 2014 UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO Ciudad Universitaria, deleg. Coyoacán, C. P. 04510, México, D.F. CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIONES SOBRE AMÉRICA DEL NORTE Torre II de Humanidades, pisos 1, 7, 9 y 10 Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, México, D.F. Tels.: (55) 5623 0000 al 09 http://www.cisan.unam.mx [email protected] ISBN 978-607-02-6035-3 Diseño de portada: Patricia Pérez Ramírez Queda prohibida su reproducción total o parcial, impresa o en cualquier medio electrónico, sin el permiso por escrito del editor. Impreso en México / Printed in Mexico ÍNDICE INTRODUCCIÓN ............................................................................................... 11 EL SISTEMA POLÍTICO CANADIENSE .................................................................... 21 Origen y desarrollo del federalismo canadiense ....................................... 24 Primeros años de los partidos políticos en Canadá .................................. 39 Gobiernos
    [Show full text]
  • To Download the PDF File
    NOTE TO USERS Page(s) missing in number only; text follows. Page(s) were scanned as received. 127 This reproduction is the best copy available. ® UMI Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Small Screen, Big Impact: A Historical Examination of the Effects of Television on the 1988 Federal Election Campaign by William Peter Stos, B.J. (Com. Hons). A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario August 8, 2006 © copyright 2006, William Peter Stos Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-18301-4 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-18301-4 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce,Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve,sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet,distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform,et/ou autres formats.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Mardi 26 Mars 2002
    CANADA 1ère SESSION • 37e LÉGISLATURE • VOLUME 139 • NUMÉRO 102 COMPTE RENDU OFFICIEL (HANSARD) Le mardi 26 mars 2002 PRÉSIDENCE DE L’HONORABLE DAN HAYS TABLE DES MATIÈRES (L’index quotidien des délibérations se trouve à la fin du présent numéro.) LE COMPTE RENDU OFFICIEL RECTIFICATION L’honorable Jane Cordy: Honorables sénateurs, je voudrais moi aussi revenir à une chose que j’ai dite le jeudi 21 mars 2002; je parlais alors des soins palliatifs. J’avais déclaré que la lettre avait été déposée au Sénat par le sénateur Kirby le 5 décembre 2002, ce qui était impossible. Il s’agissait du 5 décembre 2001. Je tenais à apporter cette rectification. RECTIFICATION [Note de l’éditeur] Dans le hansard du lundi 25 mars 2002, à la page 2515, colonne de droite, deuxième paragraphe, on dit par rapport au projet de loi C-52: «La motion est adoptée et le projet est lu une deuxième fois avec dissidence». Relativement à l’ajournement du débat par l’honorable sénateur Tkachuk, il faudrait plutôt lire «La motion est adoptée, avec dissidence». Débats et publications: Édifice Chambers, pièce 959, tél.: 992-8143 Publié par le Sénat En vente: Groupe Communication Canada — Édition, Travaux publics et Services gouvernementaux Canada, Ottawa K1A 0S9 Aussi disponible sur Internet: http://www.parl.gc.ca 2528 LE SÉNAT Le mardi 26 mars 2002 La séance est ouverte à 14 heures, le Président étant au du mérite civique de Toronto, le prix de l’entrepreneur de l’année fauteuil. du Conseil national des associations de gens d’affaires et de professionnels canadiens d’origine ethnique, l’Ordre du mérite Prière.
    [Show full text]
  • Friday, March 17, 2000
    CANADA VOLUME 136 S NUMBER 066 S 2nd SESSION S 36th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, March 17, 2000 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire'' at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 4805 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, March 17, 2000 The House met at 10 a.m. must be levelled not only against those outside the House who have made in camera material public, but must also identify the source of the leak within the House itself. It is not only a question of privilege for myself but especially for _______________ the members of the committee on citizenship and immigration who have worked very hard over the past two or three months, and on Wednesday or Thursday of this week continued to do that work, Prayers and, as I said, it was work in progress. Unfortunately the member for Lakeland and his colleague _______________ decided not to participate in those meetings and hence have done this. I think this is an important question of privilege, a privilege that affects each and every member of the House. It is incumbent D (1005 ) upon us, because we all cannot sit on each other’s committees, that we do work on behalf of each other in these committees. [English] Therefore, until such time as the document is released to the House, it is rather unfair that the members of the House of PRIVILEGE Commons do not get to see these reports before they are leaked to the public and, in this case, with intent and purpose as reported by the news media.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday, April 23, 1996
    CANADA 2nd SESSION 35th PARLIAMENT VOLUME 135 NUMBER 9 OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, April 23, 1996 THE HONOURABLE GERALD R. OTTENHEIMER SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE This issue contains the latest listing of Officers of the Senate, the Ministry, Senators and Members of the Senate and Joint Committees. CONTENTS (Daily index of proceedings appears at back of this issue.) Debates: Victoria Building, Room 407, Tel. 996-0397 Published by the Senate Available from Canada Communication Group — Publishing, Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa K1A 0S9, at $1.75 per copy or $158 per year. Also available on the Internet: http://www.parl.gc.ca 177 THE SENATE Tuesday, April 23, 1996 The Senate met at 2:00 p.m., the Speaker pro tempore in the Jean Le Moyne was a gentleman of great principles, humour Chair. and passion for Canada. When we said farewell to him on his retirement from the Senate in 1988, I noted: Prayers. Through all of the issues in the last 20 years that have THE LATE HONOURABLE JEAN LE MOYNE touched on the unity of our country Senator Le Moyne’s loyalty to his province, inside a larger loyalty to his country, TRIBUTES is a very touching and rare attribute in a Canadian politician. Hon. Joyce Fairbairn (Leader of the Government): He received many honours throughout his life for his writing, Honourable senators, I rise today on behalf of those on this side including the Governor General’s award, the Athanas David of the house to express our feelings of deep sadness at the loss of Award in 1962, the Molson Award in 1968 and the Order of our former colleague Jean Le Moyne, who, as colleagues know, Canada in 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservative Party and the 2004 Election
    The Conservative Party and the 2004 Election Laura B. Stephenson University of Western Ontario London, Ontario N6A 5C2 [email protected] Abstract In the 2004 federal election, the right-wing interests of Canadians were represented by a new party, the Conservative Party of Canada, the result of a recent merger between the Progressive Conservatives and the Canadian Alliance. This party, despite having only chosen a leader in March and not having an official constitution, did very well in the election (29.6% of the popular vote, 99 seats), at times appearing to be in sight of winning a majority government. The Conservative Party’s popularity and success suggest that voters were able to identify with the party despite their lack of experience with it - even though the party did not have clear statements of its overall ideology, many voters aligned themselves with the party and voted accordingly. What factors contributed to this outcome? In this paper, I address this question by looking at how voters perceived the new party. Did they see it as a reincarnation of the Canadian Alliance or the Progressive Conservatives? Did the familiarity of the party label add a level of recognition? Or, alternatively, was the party simply seen as the only viable alternative to the governing Liberals? These issues are discussed through an analysis of poll and survey data from the 2004 election. Paper prepared for delivery at the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, June 2-4, 2005. 1 In December 2003 it seemed like the future of the political right in Canada was brighter than it had been in years.
    [Show full text]
  • Campaign by Commercial: a Study of Advertising Strategy As Reflected In
    Bibliotheque nationale du Canada Acquisitions and Direction des acquisitions et Bibliographic Services Branch des services bibliographiques 395 Welllngton Street 395, rue Welllngton Ottawa. Ontario Ottawa (Ontarlo) KlA ON4 KIA ON4 NOTICE The quality of this microform is La qualite de cette mieroforme heavily dependent upon the depend grandement de la qualite quality of the original thesis de la th6se soumise au submitted for microfilming. microfilmage. Nous avons tout Every effort has been made to fait pour assurer une qualite ensure the highest quality of superieure de reproduction. reproduction possible. If pages are missing, contact the S'il manque des pages, veuillez university which granted the communiquer avec I'universit8 degree. qui a confere !e grade. Some pages may have indistinct La qualite d'irnpression de print especially if the original certaines pages peut laisser a pages were typed with a poor desirer, surtout si les pages typewriter ribbon or if the originales ont 6te university sent us an inferior dactylographiees a I'aide d'un photocopy. ruban use ou si I'universite nous a fait parvenir une photocopie de qualite inferieure. Reproduction in full or in part of La reproduction, m6me partielle, this microform is governed by de cette w~icroformeest soumise the Canadian Copyright Act, a la Lsi canadienne sur le droit R.S.C. 1970, c. C-30, and d'auteur, SRC 1970, c. C-30, et subsequent amendments. ses amendements subsequents. CAMPAIGN BY COMMERCIAL: A STUDY OF ADVERTISING STRATEGY AS REFLECTED IN POLITICAL ADVERTISING BROADCAST DURING THE 1988 CANADIAN GENERAL ELECTION Arlene Shwetz B.A. (Special), University of Alberta, 1983 Diploma (Radio & Television Arts), Northern Alberta Institute of Technology, 1977 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department 0 f Communication @ Arlene Shwotz 1990 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY June 1990 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]