Making "It" in Hollywood: Clara Bow, Fandom, and Consumer Culture
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Hollywood and the Hero
Hollywood and the Hero: Solving a Case of Mistaken Identity by Shannan Palma English 167 Professor Lunsford 18 March 2004 SOURCE: Andrea A. Lunsford, Book Companion Site for The Everyday Writer Palma 1 Outline Thesis statement: Recent films strongly suggest that the hero of the twenty-first century will most likely appear not as a Hollywood star or a mythical manifestation but as a combination of mortal and machine--in short, a cyborg. I. Originally relying on earlier heroes from the realms of myth and history, Hollywood studios gradually developed a system for transforming actors into star- heroes. A. Moviegoers began to identify a favorite hero-character with the particular actor who played him or her. B. The studios recognized the financial possibilities of the mass idolization of a commercialized hero and set out to manufacture this “product” efficiently. 1. The persona that a studio developed to turn an actor into a star was the only public identity that actor was allowed to have. 2. Early examples of the star-hero included Douglas Fairbanks and Mary Pickford. II. As the studio system disintegrated in the 1950s and 1960s, and the stars lost the publicity shield it had provided, the problems of stardom became obvious to the public. A. Films from this period show that the movie industry was self-mockingly aware of its pitfalls. 1.Sunset Boulevard showed what happened when a hero-image was no longer popular and the system abandoned the star it had made. SOURCE: Andrea A. Lunsford, Book Companion Site for The Everyday Writer Palma 2 2.A StarStar Is Born showed how the system created a perfect image and forced a human being to become it. -
HOLLYWOOD – the Big Five Production Distribution Exhibition
HOLLYWOOD – The Big Five Production Distribution Exhibition Paramount MGM 20th Century – Fox Warner Bros RKO Hollywood Oligopoly • Big 5 control first run theaters • Theater chains regional • Theaters required 100+ films/year • Big 5 share films to fill screens • Little 3 supply “B” films Hollywood Major • Producer Distributor Exhibitor • Distribution & Exhibition New York based • New York HQ determines budget, type & quantity of films Hollywood Studio • Hollywood production lots, backlots & ranches • Studio Boss • Head of Production • Story Dept Hollywood Star • Star System • Long Term Option Contract • Publicity Dept Paramount • Adolph Zukor • 1912- Famous Players • 1914- Hodkinson & Paramount • 1916– FP & Paramount merge • Producer Jesse Lasky • Director Cecil B. DeMille • Pickford, Fairbanks, Valentino • 1933- Receivership • 1936-1964 Pres.Barney Balaban • Studio Boss Y. Frank Freeman • 1966- Gulf & Western Paramount Theaters • Chicago, mid West • South • New England • Canada • Paramount Studios: Hollywood Paramount Directors Ernst Lubitsch 1892-1947 • 1926 So This Is Paris (WB) • 1929 The Love Parade • 1932 One Hour With You • 1932 Trouble in Paradise • 1933 Design for Living • 1939 Ninotchka (MGM) • 1940 The Shop Around the Corner (MGM Cecil B. DeMille 1881-1959 • 1914 THE SQUAW MAN • 1915 THE CHEAT • 1920 WHY CHANGE YOUR WIFE • 1923 THE 10 COMMANDMENTS • 1927 KING OF KINGS • 1934 CLEOPATRA • 1949 SAMSON & DELILAH • 1952 THE GREATEST SHOW ON EARTH • 1955 THE 10 COMMANDMENTS Paramount Directors Josef von Sternberg 1894-1969 • 1927 -
Hollywood Cinema Walter C
Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Publications Department of Cinema and Photography 2006 Hollywood Cinema Walter C. Metz Southern Illinois University Carbondale, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cp_articles Recommended Citation Metz, Walter C. "Hollywood Cinema." The Cambridge Companion to Modern American Culture. Ed. Christopher Bigsby. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. (Jan 2006): 374-391. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Cinema and Photography at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “Hollywood Cinema” By Walter Metz Published in: The Cambridge Companion to Modern American Culture. Ed. Christopher Bigsby. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006. 374-391. Hollywood, soon to become the United States’ national film industry, was founded in the early teens by a group of film companies which came to Los Angeles at first to escape the winter conditions of their New York- and Chicago-based production locations. However, the advantages of production in southern California—particularly the varied landscapes in the region crucial for exterior, on-location photography—soon made Hollywood the dominant film production center in the country.i Hollywood, of course, is not synonymous with filmmaking in the United States. Before the early 1910s, American filmmaking was mostly New York-based, and specialized in the production of short films (circa 1909, a one-reel short, or approximately 10 minutes). At the time, French film companies dominated global film distribution, and it was more likely that one would see a French film in the United States than an American-produced one. -
Marilyn Monroe's Star Canon: Postwar American Culture and the Semiotics
University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--English English 2016 MARILYN MONROE’S STAR CANON: POSTWAR AMERICAN CULTURE AND THE SEMIOTICS OF STARDOM Amanda Konkle University of Kentucky, [email protected] Digital Object Identifier: http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/ETD.2016.038 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Konkle, Amanda, "MARILYN MONROE’S STAR CANON: POSTWAR AMERICAN CULTURE AND THE SEMIOTICS OF STARDOM" (2016). Theses and Dissertations--English. 28. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/english_etds/28 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the English at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--English by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. -
Rory Tell Undergraduate Seminar Shifting Attitudes On
Rory Tell Undergraduate Seminar Shifting Attitudes on Masculinity in 1930s American Film Introduction: The interaction between politics and film in the 1930s is at the core of this work. In the thirties, the cultural significance of movies was strengthened by its connection to the political circumstances of the era. The year 1933 acts as a watershed moment: there was a Depression and a New Deal, there was a pre-code cinema (films made after the advent of sound in 1929, but before the enforcement of the Motion Picture Production Code censorship guidelines) and a self- censored cinema (films made during Motion Picture Production Code censorship guidelines), and therein lies the symbolic connection of political history and film. The connection of these events requires further investigation, as film studios were not passive participants of New Deal culture; instead, there was a similar ideological function, and an interchange, between politics and films. In the 1930s, Warner Brothers received worldwide recognition for the movies they had been producing. Harry Warner used his film’s success to expand the company so that by the end of the decade, Warner Bros. owned 51 subsidiary companies, including 93 film exchanges and 525 theaters in 188 American cities. Warner Bros. executives, and in specific, co-head of production and one of the founding members, Jack Warner, supported Franklin Roosevelt and the socially progressive platforms of the New Deal. The Warner brothers worked to help elect Roosevelt in 1932 by staging rallies for him in Los Angeles that they broadcasted over radio stations. They contributed to his campaign with financial and promotional support, and Roosevelt, in turn, promised to make Jack Warner the Los Angeles Chairman of the National Recovery Administration, which turned out to be a key component of Roosevelt’s New Deal. -
Disparities for Women Filmmakers in the Film Industry Bobbie Lucas
Vassar College Digital Window @ Vassar Senior Capstone Projects 2015 Behind Every Great Man There Are More Men: Disparities for Women Filmmakers in the Film Industry Bobbie Lucas Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalwindow.vassar.edu/senior_capstone Recommended Citation Lucas, Bobbie, "Behind Every Great Man There Are More Men: Disparities for Women Filmmakers in the Film Industry" (2015). Senior Capstone Projects. Paper 387. This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Window @ Vassar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of Digital Window @ Vassar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Vassar College “Behind Every Great Man There Are More Men:” Disparities for Women Filmmakers in the Film Industry A research thesis submitted to The Department of Film Bobbie Lucas Fall 2014 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS “Someday hopefully it won’t be necessary to allocate a special evening [Women in Film] to celebrate where we are and how far we’ve come…someday women writers, producers, and crew members will be so commonplace, and roles and salaries for actresses will outstrip those for men, and pigs will fly.” --Sigourney Weaver For the women filmmakers who made films and established filmmaking careers in the face of adversity and misogyny, and for those who will continue to do so. I would like to express my appreciation to the people who helped me accomplish this endeavor: Dara Greenwood, Associate Professor of Psychology Paul Johnson, Professor of Economics Evsen Turkay Pillai, Associate Professor of Economics I am extremely grateful for the valuable input you provided on my ideas and your willing assistance in my research. -
Actor Familiarity and Likeability Effects on Emotional Mimicry of Cinematic Displays
Article What’s the value of a star? Actor familiarity and likeability effects on emotional mimicry of cinematic displays ELEN LOTMAN, Tallinn University, Estonia, [email protected] ALAN VOODLA, Tartu University, Estonia, [email protected] ANDERO UUSBERG, Tartu University, Estonia, [email protected] 4 10.2478/bsmr-2019-0001 BALTIC SCREEN MEDIA REVIEW 2019 / VOLUME 7 / ARTICLE ABSTRACT Researchers and practitioners have long been intrigued by the role of stars in the film industry (McDonald 2005). Actors with star status can enhance the economic prospects of a film (Wallaceet al. 1993). For instance, replacing average stars with top stars has been shown to increase revenue (Nelson, Glotfelty 2012). A meta-analysis of 61 studies collating data from 1545 films has shown the significant effect of commercial star power on Hollywood films’ revenues (Hofmann,et al. 2017). The Hollywood movie industry can be viewed as a system that maintains and regulates the popularity of existing and emerging stars through agents, producers and award systems (McDonald 2013). Yet it is unclear why the phenomenon of on the European star system consider it stardom arises. According to one hypoth- a rare phenomenon (Hedling 2009), sug- esis, the fact that stardom is more evident gesting that European stardom should be in Hollywood revenue-dependent filmmak- appreciated differently (Soila 2009), that ing than in independent filmmaking, sug- one of the differences comes from the lack gests that stars activate some psychologi- of the industrial construction of the star’s cal inclinations that motivate people to see image (Vincendeau 2000). Yet, the poten- a movie (Cutting et al. -
The Development of Child Stars in the Studio System of the 1930S Through '50S
University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work 5-2011 "Daddy Dearest": The Development of Child Stars in the Studio System of the 1930s through '50s Brittany N. Dalton [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Part of the Child Psychology Commons, and the Film and Media Studies Commons Recommended Citation Dalton, Brittany N., ""Daddy Dearest": The Development of Child Stars in the Studio System of the 1930s through '50s" (2011). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/1437 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 “Daddy Dearest”: The Development of Child Stars in the Studio System of the 1930s through the ‘50s Written by Brittany N. Dalton Special Thanks: Julia A. Malia, Ph. D., C.F.L.E. May 10, 2011 Abstract 2 The purpose of this paper is to analyze the effects growing up in the studio system had on child stars from the 1930s through 1950s. I chose to focus my research and analysis on three child stars in particular: Judy Garland, Elizabeth Taylor, and Shirley Temple. These three actresses each had different experiences in their careers and relationships to the studio; however, they were all well-known and influential child stars. -
The Photoplay Or the Pickaxe: Extras, Gender, and Labour in Early Hollywood Author(S): Denise Mckenna Source: Film History, Vol
The photoplay or the pickaxe: extras, gender, and labour in early Hollywood Author(s): Denise McKenna Source: Film History, Vol. 23, No. 1, Art, Industry, Technology (January 2011), pp. 5-19 Published by: Indiana University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/filmhistory.23.1.5 . Accessed: 15/06/2011 09:03 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at . http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=iupress. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Indiana University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Film History. http://www.jstor.org Film History, Volume 23, pp. -
The Star System in South Africa 29 May 2020
The Star System in South Africa 29 May 2020 Page 1 of 72 DOCUMENT INFORMATION Document title: THE STAR SYSTEM IN SOUTH AFRICA May 2020 Prepared by: Urban-Econ Development Economists Contact details: 37 Hunt Road Glenwood Durban 4062 South Africa Tel: +27 (0)31 202 9673 e-mail: [email protected] Contact Person: Eugene de Beer Prepared for: KZN Film Commission 115 Musgrave Road,13th Floor Musgrave Towers, Berea, Durban 4001 Tel: 031 325 0200 Contact Person: Dr N. Bhebhe Manager: Research and Development Email: [email protected] 031 325 0216 Page 2 of 72 CONTENTS 5.7 EXTENDING THE SCOPE OF LABOUR REGULATIONS .................. 46 2 5.8 THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE BILLS .............................................. 46 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................... 6 5.9 CONCLUSION................................................................................ 47 2. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 8 5. THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK OF THE PROPOSED SYSTEM .... 49 2.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................ 8 6.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 49 2.2 METHODOLOGY .............................................................................. 8 6.2 STRUCTURE AND FORM ................................................................ 49 2.3 REPORT STRUCTURE ........................................................................ -
The Gossip Industry
Copyright by Anne Helen Petersen 2011 The Dissertation Committee for Anne Helen Petersen Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: THE GOSSIP INDUSTRY: PRODUCING AND DISTRIBUTING STAR IMAGES, CELEBRITY GOSSIP, AND ENTERTAINMENT NEWS 1910 - 2010 Committee: Janet Staiger, Supervisor Thomas Schatz Michael Kackman Susan McLeland Mary Desjardins THE GOSSIP INDUSTRY: PRODUCING AND DISTRIBUTING STAR IMAGES, CELEBRITY GOSSIP, AND ENTERTAINMENT NEWS 1910 - 2010 by ANNE HELEN PETERSEN, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2011 Dedication For my mother, who has always modeled intelligence with verve. Acknowledgements I would not be the scholar I am today without the tremendous and ongoing support of a number of professors, all of whom have modeled the type of mentorship, scholarship, and dedication to the field that I try to emulate. From my first semester as an undergrad to my final semester as a Ph.D. student, Janet Staiger, Thomas Schatz, and Michael Kackman at the University of Texas, Michael Aronson at the University of Oregon, and Robert Sickels at Whitman College have served as models, mentors, colleagues, and friends. The dissertation-writing process was an arduous one made enjoyable by the efficiency and editorial guidance of Janet Staiger and the keen eyes of my committee members. I am particularly grateful to Susan McLeland and Mary Desjardins for their close readings and insight on early versions of various chapters. -
Film Terms Glossary Cinematic Terms Definition and Explanation Example (If Applicable) 180 Degree Rule a Screen Direction Rule T
Film Terms Glossary Cinematic Terms Definition and Explanation Example (if applicable) a screen direction rule that camera operators must follow - Camera placement an imaginary line on one side of the axis of action is made must adhere to the (e.g., between two principal actors in a scene), and the 180 degree rule 180 degree rule camera must not cross over that line - otherwise, there is a distressing visual discontinuity and disorientation; similar to the axis of action (an imaginary line that separates the camera from the action before it) that should not be crossed Example: at 24 fps, 4 refers to the standard frame rate or film speed - the number projected frames take 1/6 of frames or images that are projected or displayed per second to view second; in the silent era before a standard was set, many 24 frames per second films were projected at 16 or 18 frames per second, but that rate proved to be too slow when attempting to record optical film sound tracks; aka 24fps or 24p Examples: the first major 3D feature film was Bwana Devil (1953) [the first a film that has a three-dimensional, stereoscopic form or was Power of Love (1922)], House of Wax appearance, giving the life-like illusion of depth; often (1953), Cat Women of the Moon (1953), the achieved by viewers donning special red/blue (or green) or MGM musicalKiss Me Kate polarized lens glasses; when 3-D images are made (1953), Warner's Hondo (1953), House of 3-D interactive so that users feel involved with the scene, the Wax (1953), a version of Hitchcock's Dial M experience is