Monitoring and Survey of Cymopterus Williamsii (Williams’ Springparsley), North-Central Wyoming

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Monitoring and Survey of Cymopterus Williamsii (Williams’ Springparsley), North-Central Wyoming Monitoring and survey of Cymopterus williamsii (Williams’ springparsley), north-central Wyoming Prepared for Bureau of Land Management Wyoming State Office by Joy Handley Wyoming Natural Diversity Database Dept. 3381,University of Wyoming Laramie, WY 82071 July 2019 BLM Cooperative Agreement No. L16AC00389 Supplement 5 ABSTRACT Cymopterus williamsii (Williams’ springparsley), a Wyoming endemic, was surveyed for detailed information about known occurrences and to initiate monitoring in selected occurrences 2016-2018. Specific location, population distribution, and habitat data were collected for four occurrences that were only known from specimen collections, while more extensive mapping and data were gathered for seven other known populations. One new occurrence was found by chance. Status assessment, monitoring results, and conservation concerns are provided based on prior knowledge, current and future land uses, and new understanding gained from these surveys. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Collections and taxonomic work by Ronald Hartman, of the Rocky Mountain Herbarium (RM), remains central to understanding current taxonomy and status. Collections by B.E. “Ernie” Nelson and graduate students have contributed greatly to current knowledge. The facilities and resources of RM were fundamental to this study. Walter Fertig surveyed and addressed the species status in previous reports, and worked with Rob Thurston to develop and refine a potential distribution model for Cymopterus williamsii through Wyoming Natural Diversity Database (WYNDD). Kaylan Hubbard, of WYNDD, assisted with fieldwork and photography. Trey Davis and Josh Criswell, of The Nature Conservancy (TNC) Tensleep Preserve, provided lodging and facilities, as well as logistical and vehicle assistance, during the fieldwork. Robin Jones, of Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, made recommendations for the materials site along Bighorn Mountain Road. Robin and Sunny Taylor, owners of Flying Diamond Ranch, granted me access to Barnum Mountain Road in Johnson County, allowing me to survey an area of Cymopterus williamsii known only from a 1975 collection. James Wolf, of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Wind River/Bighorn Basin District, provided information about the Brokenback Fire. Tanya Skurski, BLM Wyoming State Office; Karen Hepp, BLM Worland Field Office; Charlotte Darling, BLM Buffalo Field Office; and Bonnie Heidel, WYNDD; provided project coordination. This project was conducted as a challenge cost-share between BLM and WYNDD. Report citation: Handley, J. 2019. Monitoring and survey of Cymopterus williamsii (Williams’ springparsley), north-central Wyoming. Report prepared for Bureau of Land Management - Wyoming State Office by Wyoming Natural Diversity Database - University of Wyoming Laramie, Wyoming Cover photo and all other photos by the author unless labeled otherwise ii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................... 1 2016............................................................................................................................................. 1 2017............................................................................................................................................. 2 2018............................................................................................................................................. 3 SPECIES INFORMATION ............................................................................................................ 3 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Geographical Distribution ........................................................................................................... 4 Habitat ......................................................................................................................................... 9 Population Biology and Demography ....................................................................................... 15 MONITORING ............................................................................................................................. 16 Transects ................................................................................................................................... 16 Discussion ................................................................................................................................. 28 CONSERVATION CONSIDERATIONS .................................................................................... 31 Potential Threats to Currently Known Populations .................................................................. 31 Notes Regarding Present or Anticipated Activities .................................................................. 33 Summary ................................................................................................................................... 35 LITERATURE CITED ................................................................................................................. 36 Appendix A. Element Occurrence Records and Maps for Cymopterus williamsii and a New Element Occurrence Record and Map for Physaria didymocarpa var. lanata Appendix B. Transect Maps and Coordinates Appendix C. 2016 - 2018 Transect Datasheets Appendix D. 2017 and 2018 Censuses of EO #008 Appendix E. Deadman Butte Materials Site Correspondence iii FIGURES Figure 1. Cymopterus williamsii in flower. Figure 2. Rangewide distribution of Cymopterus williamsii. Figure 3. Cymopterus williamsii habitat ca 2 miles southwest of Deadman Butte, ca 6 miles north of Arminto (EO #001). Figure 4. Cymopterus williamsii habitat along the E-K Trail, near the heads of E-K Creek and Cottonwood Creek (EO #003). Figure 5. Cymopterus williamsii habitat along Thirty-three Mile Road (County Road 110) between Eagle Creek and Buffalo Creek (EO #004). Figure 6. Cymopterus williamsii habitat along Slip/Mayoworth Slope Road (County Road 67). between Red Spring Hill and the head of Martin Draw (EO #007). Figure 7. Cymopterus williamsii habitat along Barnum Mountain Road (EO #010). Figure 8. Cymopterus williamsii habitat along Billy Creek Road (BLM Road 6207) (EO #020). Figure 9. Cymopterus williamsii habitat above Middle Fork Powder River, Outlaw Cave Campground (EO #032), part of the 2006 Outlaw 2 Fire. Figure 10. Cymopterus williamsii habitat on the ridge between Billy and Canyon creeks, and Bader Gulch (EO #033). Figure 11. Comparison of average temperatures (°F) at Ten Sleep 16 SSE weather station. Figure 12. Comparison of snowfall (inches) at Ten Sleep 16 SSE weather station. Figure 13. Comparison of precipitation (inches) at Ten Sleep 16 SSE weather station. Figure 14. Occurrences of Cymopterus williamsii with monitoring transects established in 2016- 2017. Figure 15. Transect at EO #001 start. Figure 16. Transect at EO #001 end. Figure 17. Transect at EO #008 start (edge of 1996 North Brokenback Fire). Figure 18. Transect at EO #008 end. Figure 19. Unburned transect at EO #020 start. Figure 20. Unburned transect at EO #020 end. Figure 21. Burned transect at EO #020 start (2003 Big Spring Fire). Figure 22. Burned transect at EO #020 end. Figure 23. Transect at EO #027 start. Figure 24. Transect at EO #027 end. Figure 25. Unburned transect at EO #032 start. Figure 26. Unburned transect at EO #032 end. Figure 27. Burned transect at EO #032 start (2006 Outlaw 2 Fire). Figure 28. Burned transect at EO #032 end. Figure 29. Transects established in 2016 and reread in 2017. Figure 30. Transects read all three years. Figure 31. Transects read in both 2017 and 2018. Figure 32. 2015 remains of the 1996 North Brokenback Fire, in the vicinity of EO #008. iv Figure 33. Cymopterus williamsii in the 2016 remains of the 2006 Outlaw 2 Fire, EO #032. Figure 34. Livestock trailing and road in EO #015. Figure 35. Slash pile near EO #022, private land nearby. The Cymopterus williamsii population is principally on and around the dolomite outcrop near the center of the photo. Figure 36. EO #015 DEQ Deadman Butte Materials Site. Figure 37. Cymopterus williamsii habitat between Red Fork Powder River and North Fork Little Canyon Creek (EO #027). TABLES Table 1. Location information for known occurrences of Cymopterus williamsii. Table 2. Summary of 2016 transect data for Cymopterus williamsii. Table 3. Summary of 2017 transect data for Cymopterus williamsii. Table 4. Summary of 2018 transect data for Cymopterus williamsii. Table 5. Change in plant numbers in the EO # 020 paired transects. Table 6. Change in plant numbers in the EO # 032 paired transects. v INTRODUCTION Cymopterus williamsii (Williams’ springparsley) is endemic to the southern Big Horn Mountains in north-central Wyoming and is a Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Sensitive Species (USDI BLM 2001, 2010). The status of C. williamsii was previously addressed in three reports (Fertig 1993, 1999; Handley 2016) and in a state species abstract (Fertig 2000). Need for renewed surveys in the BLM Buffalo and Casper Field Offices and initiation of monitoring were identified based on: a lack of surveys on the east side of the Big Horn Mountains since 1992; the potential for more detailed field mapping with the Global Positioning System (GPS); and
Recommended publications
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1. Species Summaries and Element Occurrence Records For
    Appendix 1. Species summaries and element occurrence records for Campanula uniflora, Cymopterus evertii, Descurainia torulosa Helictotrichon hookeri, Papaver kluanense, and Thalictrum alpinum in the Carter Mountain Area of Critical Environmental Concern UYC»4ING NATURAL DIVERSITY DATABASE - The Nature Conservancy Key to Selected Fields in the Element Occurrence Database SNAME - The scientific name, in Latin, used in Wyoming (may be different in another state). SCOMNAME - The common name used in Wyoming. GRANK - The global rank assigned by TNC's network of Heritage Programs, based on world-wide distribution and threats. Ranks vary from G1, very rare or greatly threatened, through GS, common and secure. SRANK- The state rank assigned by each state Heritage Program, based on distribution within the state. Again, these ranks vary from S1, very rare or threatened, through SS, common and secure. These ranks may be different from state to state depending on the range of the taxon in each state. WYPLANT L!Sl-- WYNDD maintains a state lis~ where plants of special concern in the state appear on List 1, High Priority (rare, threatened, or endangered), List 2, Medium Priority, or List 3, Low Priority. PRECISION - The degree of refinement for an occurrence when it is mapped on a USGS quad; S=within seconds, M=within minutes, G=general (somewhere on the cited quad). COUNTYNAME - The county where the occurrence is located. QUADNAME - The name of the USGS 7.5 minute quad. MARG NUM indicates the dot on the map at the WYNDD office. LAT, LONG - Central latitude and longitude of the location if known from mapping procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Cymopterus Williamsii (Williams' Springparsley)
    Status of Cymopterus williamsii (Williams’ springparsley), north-central Wyoming Prepared for Bureau of Land Management Worland Field Office and Wyoming State Office by Joy Handley Wyoming Natural Diversity Database Dept. 3381,University of Wyoming Laramie, WY 82071 January 2016 BLM Cooperative Agreement No. L12AC20036 Supplement 4 ABSTRACT Cymopterus williamsii (Williams’ springparsley), a Wyoming endemic, was surveyed for detailed information about known occurrences and to locate possible new occurrences. A potential distribution model and aerial photointerpretation of habitat were used to identify areas for new surveys. Specific location, population distribution, and habitat data were collected for two occurrences that were only known from specimen collections, while more extensive mapping and data were gathered for two other known populations. Three new occurrences were found, providing some verification for the potential distribution model. Species information, status assessment, and management recommendations are provided based on prior knowledge, current and future land uses, and new understanding gained from these surveys. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Collections and taxonomic work by Ronald Hartman of the Rocky Mountain Herbarium (RM) remains central to understanding current taxonomy and status. Collections by B.E. “Ernie” Nelson and graduate students have contributed greatly to current knowledge. The facilities and resources of RM were fundamental to this study. Walter Fertig surveyed and addressed the species status in previous reports, and worked with Rob Thurston to develop and refine a potential distribution model for Cymopterus williamsii through Wyoming Natural Diversity Database (WYNDD). Trey Davis and Josh Criswell of The Nature Conservancy (TNC) Tensleep Preserve provided lodging and facilities during the surveys. Brooks Jordan of the Wyoming State Parks Medicine Lodge Archeological Site furnished important information about access in the park.
    [Show full text]
  • ICBEMP Analysis of Vascular Plants
    APPENDIX 1 Range Maps for Species of Concern APPENDIX 2 List of Species Conservation Reports APPENDIX 3 Rare Species Habitat Group Analysis APPENDIX 4 Rare Plant Communities APPENDIX 5 Plants of Cultural Importance APPENDIX 6 Research, Development, and Applications Database APPENDIX 7 Checklist of the Vascular Flora of the Interior Columbia River Basin 122 APPENDIX 1 Range Maps for Species of Conservation Concern These range maps were compiled from data from State Heritage Programs in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Utah, and Nevada. This information represents what was known at the end of the 1994 field season. These maps may not represent the most recent information on distribution and range for these taxa but it does illustrate geographic distribution across the assessment area. For many of these species, this is the first time information has been compiled on this scale. For the continued viability of many of these taxa, it is imperative that we begin to manage for them across their range and across administrative boundaries. Of the 173 taxa analyzed, there are maps for 153 taxa. For those taxa that were not tracked by heritage programs, we were not able to generate range maps. (Antmnnrin aromatica) ( ,a-’(,. .e-~pi~] i----j \ T--- d-,/‘-- L-J?.,: . ey SAP?E%. %!?:,KnC,$ESS -,,-a-c--- --y-- I -&zII~ County Boundaries w1. ~~~~ State Boundaries <ii&-----\ \m;qw,er Columbia River Basin .---__ ,$ 4 i- +--pa ‘,,, ;[- ;-J-k, Assessment Area 1 /./ .*#a , --% C-p ,, , Suecies Locations ‘V 7 ‘\ I, !. / :L __---_- r--j -.---.- Columbia River Basin s-5: ts I, ,e: I’ 7 j ;\ ‘-3 “.
    [Show full text]
  • Cymopterus Evertii Hartman & Kirkpatrick (Evert’S Springparsley): a Technical Conservation Assessment
    Cymopterus evertii Hartman & Kirkpatrick (Evert’s springparsley): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project November 19, 2004 Lynn Moore1 and Sandy Friedley2 1Windom Floristics 361 South Camino Del Rio #222 Durango, CO 81303 2Ecosphere Environmental Services 2257 Main Avenue Durango, CO 81301 Peer Review Administered by Society for Conservation Biology Moore, L. and S. Friedley. (2004, November 19). Cymopterus evertii Hartman & Kirkpatrick (Evert’s springparsley): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/cymopterusevertii.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank Tessa Dutcher and Bonnie Heidel of the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database for their assistance and prompt responses to our inquiries. Thanks go to Kent Houston of the Shoshone National Forest for providing management information. Gratitude goes to Ron Hartman for patiently and promptly answering emails concerning the systematics and taxonomy of Cymopterus evertii. We offer our thanks to Walter and Laura Fertig for responding to questions concerning past work on this species. We are grateful to the Rocky Mountain Herbarium (RM), USFS Region 4 Herbarium (OGDF), Intermountain Herbarium (UTC), University of Montana (MONTU), R. L. McGregor Herbarium (KANU), and University of Colorado Museum (COLO) for providing herbarium label data. Additional thanks go to Walter Fertig and Rob Thurston for sharing their data concerning predicted distribution and Irwin Evert for providing background information on botanical investigations in northern Wyoming. We would also like to express our appreciation to Ken Heil, Mark Porter, David Inouye, Beth Burkhart and other reviewers for their comments and review of the manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • (Cymopterus Evertii) in Northwestern Wyoming
    Status Report on Evert’s waferparsnip (Cymopterus evertii ) in Northwestern Wyoming Prepared for the Bureau of Land Management Wyoming State Office By Walter Fertig, Laura Welp, and Stuart Markow Wyoming Natural Diversity Database University of Wyoming 1604 Grand Ave. Laramie, WY 82070 8 February 1999 Agreement # K910-A4-0011 Task Order No. TO-015 Abstract Cymopterus evertii (Evert’s wafer-parsnip) is a regional endemic of northwestern Wyoming and northeastern Utah that was first described as a new species in 1986. The species is currently known from 20 occurrences, 18 of which are found in the Absaroka and Owl Creek mountains and western Bighorn Basin in Hot Springs and Park counties, Wyoming. Based on surveys in 1988 and 1996-98, the current Wyoming population is conservatively estimated at over 30,000 individuals in over 300 acres of habitat. C. evertii typically occurs on sparsely vegetated, montane or alpine rocky slopes and ridgetops of volcanic andesitic soils in the Absaroka and Owl Creek ranges or in openings on sandstone ridges or knolls within limber pine/Rocky Mountain juniper or big sagebrush/Idaho fescue communities in the Bighorn Basin. Populations at higher elevations are largely protected by their ruggedness and inaccessibility, while those in the Bighorn Basin are potentially threatened by development associated with oil and gas development and recreation. At least 8 populations are currently protected in the Washakie Wilderness on Shoshone National Forest or in the BLM Carter Mountain ACEC. This species was formerly a candidate for listing under the Endangered Species Act, but was dropped from consideration due to its low threats and local abundance in the Shoshone National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensitive Species Lists in Some Adjacent States As Well As Lists from Other Federal and State Agencies in Wyoming Were Reviewed for This Effort
    BLM Wyoming Sensitive Species Policy and List March 31, 2010 Introduction The USDI Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Wyoming has prepared this list of sensitive species to focus species management efforts towards maintaining habitats under a multiple use mandate. Many species are not on this list due to the lack of status, distribution and habitat requirement information which prohibits any management attention. The goals of this sensitive species policy are to: • Maintain vulnerable species and habitat components in functional BLM ecosystems. • Ensure sensitive species are considered in land management decisions. • Prevent a need for species listing under the Endangered Species Act. • Prioritize needed conservation work with an emphasis on habitat. Authority The authority for this policy and guidance comes from the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended; Title II of the Sikes Act, as amended; the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) of 1976; and the Department Manual 235.1.1A., General Program Delegation, Director, Bureau of Land Management. Special Status Species include those species listed or proposed for listing under the ESA together with species designated internally as BLM sensitive in accordance with BLM Manual 6840. Actions authorized by the BLM shall further the conservation and/or recovery of federally listed species and conservation of Bureau sensitive species. Bureau sensitive species will be managed consistent with species and habitat management objectives in land use and implementation plans to promote their conservation and to minimize the likelihood and need for listing under the ESA. Criteria set forth in the 0.2A section of the 6840 Manual for designating sensitive species are: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Cymopterus): Molecular and Morphological Evidence Suggests Complex Relationships Among the Perennial Endemic Genera of Western North American Apiaceae
    Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen 1295 Polyphyly of the spring-parsleys (Cymopterus): molecular and morphological evidence suggests complex relationships among the perennial endemic genera of western North American Apiaceae Stephen R. Downie, Ronald L. Hartman, Feng-Jie Sun, and Deborah S. Katz-Downie Abstract: Cladistic analyses of DNA sequences from the nuclear rDNA internal transcribed spacer region and cpDNA rps16 intron and, for a subset of taxa, the cpDNA trnF-trnL-trnT locus were carried out to evaluate the monophyly of Cymopterus and to ascertain its phylogenetic placement among the other perennial genera of Apiaceae (Umbelliferae) subfamily Apioideae endemic to western North America. To elucidate patterns in the evolution of specific fruit charac- ters and to evaluate their utility in circumscribing genera unambiguously, additional evidence was procured from cross-sections of mature fruits and the results of cladistic analysis of 25 morphological characters. Analyses of the par- titioned data sets resulted in weakly supported and largely unresolved phylogenetic hypotheses, possibly due to the rapid radiation of the group, whereas the combined analysis of all molecular evidence resulted in a well-resolved phy- logeny with higher bootstrap support. The traditionally used fruit characters of wing shape and composition and orien- tation of mericarp compression are highly variable. The results of these analyses reveal that Cymopterus and Lomatium, the two largest genera of western North American Apiaceae, are polyphyletic, and that their species are inextricably linked with those of other endemic perennial genera of the region (such as, Aletes, Musineon, Oreoxis, Pseudocymopterus, Pteryxia, and Tauschia), many of which are also not monophyletic.
    [Show full text]
  • Johnson County Natural Resource Management Plan
    DECEMBER 1, 2020 Johnson County Natural Resource Management Plan Natural Resource Management Plan Y2 Consultants, LLC & Falen Law Offices (Intentionally Left Blank) CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................... III LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................... IV ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................................... V INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................................ 1 PLAN ORGANIZATION ........................................................................................................................ 5 PROCESS ......................................................................................................................................... 6 AMENDING THE NRMP ..................................................................................................................... 6 COUNTY EXPECTATIONS FOR NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN ..................................................... 7 CHAPTER 1: CUSTOM AND CULTURE ...................................................................................... 9 1.1 COUNTY INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Convergent Evolution and Species Boundaries in Lomatium Species (Apiaceae)
    CONVERGENT EVOLUTION AND SPECIES BOUNDARIES IN LOMATIUM SPECIES (APIACEAE) by Michael Ottenlips A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biology Boise State University May 2019 Michael Ottenlips SOME RIGHTS RESERVED This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internatonal License. BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE COLLEGE DEFENSE COMMITTEE AND FINAL READING APPROVALS of the thesis submitted by Michael Ottenlips Thesis Title: Convergent Evolution and Species Boundaries in Lomatium Species (Apiaceae) Date of Final Oral Examination: 15 February 2019 The following individuals read and discussed the thesis submitted by student Michael Ottenlips, and they evaluated his presentation and response to questions during the final oral examination. They found that the student passed the final oral examination. James F. Smith, Ph.D. Chair, Supervisory Committee Stephen Novak. Ph.D. Member, Supervisory Committee Sven Buerki, Ph.D. Member, Supervisory Committee Donald H. Mansfield, D.A. Member, Supervisory Committee The final reading approval of the thesis was granted by James F. Smith, Ph.D., Chair of the Supervisory Committee. The thesis was approved by the Graduate College. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge the following mentors, collaborators, and friends: My major professor Jim Smith for always being available to discuss research questions, technical problems, and anything else no matter how important or trivial. My graduate committee for providing research guidance, especially Sven Buerki for all the bioinformatics assistance, arranging the visit to Kew Gardens, and providing accesses to his Linux machines. Steve Novak, for his great teaching and guidance on molecular ecology theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Sagebrush-Associated Species of Conservation Concern
    The U.S. Geological Survey has provided full-text access to the following publication: Chapter 2: Sagebrush-associated species of conservation concern By Mary M. Rowland, Lowell H. Suring, Matthias Leu, Steven T. Knick, and Michael J. Wisdom Published in: Sagebrush ecosystem conservation and management: Ecoregional assessment tools and models for the Wyoming Basins, 2011, p. 46-68 Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. The U.S. Geological Survey has been given express permission by the publisher to provide full-text access online for this publication, and is posted with the express permission from the Publications Warehouse Guidance Subcommittee. Sagebrush Ecosystem Conservation and Management: 46–68, 2011 Chapter 2: Sagebrush-Associated Species of Conservation Concern Mary M. Rowland, Lowell H. Suring, Matthias Leu, Steven T. Knick, Michael J. Wisdom Abstract. Selection of species of con- Key words: ecoregional assessment, cern is a critical early step in conducting sagebrush ecosystem, species of conserva- broad-scale ecological assessments for tion concern, species selection, terrestrial conservation planning and management. vertebrates, vascular plants, Wyoming Ba- Many criteria can be used to guide this sins. selection, such as conservation status, ex- Ecoregional assessments may rely on isting knowledge base, and association coarse- or fine-filter approaches or both, with plant communities of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Niobrara Conservation District Draft Natural Resource Management Plan
    FEBRUARY 15,15, 2021 Niobrara Conservation District Draft Natural Resource Management Plan Natural Resource Management Plan Y2 Consultants, LLC & Falen Law Offices (Intentionally Left Blank) Natural Resource Management Plan Y2 Consultants, LLC & Falen Law Offices CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................... III LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................... V ACRONYMS .......................................................................................................................... VI CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 PURPOSE................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK ....................................................................... 1 1.3 PROTECTION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS .................................................................................... 7 1.4 NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN ORGANIZATION ................................................................ 9 1.5 NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS .................................................... 9 1.6 COUNTY EXPECTATIONS FOR NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN ............................................. 10 1.7 CREDIBLE DATA .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]