UVA-PHA-0033 CASE WRITING One of the Most Important Aspects of Case Method Teaching Is the Development and Use of Good Materials
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UVA-PHA-0033 CASE WRITING One of the most important aspects of case method teaching is the development and use of good materials. Some good cases have been around for many, many years. Although they appear dated and obsolete to the casual observer, they contain issues and problems that have endured and continue to be powerful teaching tools. Students, however, disdain to read cases written as much as 10 years prior. Cases with “old” copyright dates can dampen their interest in the case and even undermine the case’s credibility with them. Students may not get the benefit of discussing an enduring issue if they have “turned off” because of the copyright date. Consequently, the question arises, “Where does one find good, current cases?” and, if that search for the right case fails, “How does one write good cases?” The Current Case Pool Perhaps the largest collection of well-written cases resides in Harvard Case Services (HCS) at the Harvard Business School in Boston, Massachusetts. For many years the Harvard Business School administered an international, intercollegiate case clearing house (ICCH) where they received, cataloged, and distributed cases not only from their own faculty but from others around the world. This practice was discontinued in the early 1980s. HCS now only distributes cases written by their own faculty. While these are primarily intended for Harvard’s own classes, the distribution of cases remains a strong business venture for the school. Harvard produces a hard-copy bibliography of all their cases with useful indices to help you find the kind of material you may need. Recently, they have been experimenting with and distributing electronic versions of this bibliography; soon one may search for topics from a computer file rather than flipping through a bound bibliography. Other sources of current cases include Darden Business Publishing (DBP) at the Darden Graduate School of Business Administration at the University of Virginia, Charlottesville, and Case Reproduction Services at Western Ontario University in Ontario, Canada. DBP publishes an annual bibliography similar to Harvard’s but smaller in scope. The DBP bibliography also includes teaching notes for many of the cases. Other schools, such as Stanford University, Northwestern University, Dartmouth College, and Columbia University also support and encourage case development and writing, although on a much smaller scale. This technical note was prepared by Professor James G. Clawson. Copyright © 1995 by the University of Virginia Darden School Foundation, Charlottesville, VA. All rights reserved. To order copies, send an e-mail to [email protected]. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—without the permission of the Darden School Foundation. ◊ -2- UVA-PHA-0033 In addition to academic institutions which encourage case writing and dissemination, there are some associations which have meetings to encourage and improve the quality of case writing. Perhaps the best known of these is the North America Case Research Association which holds an annual meeting in November of each year, where new case materials are distributed, discussed, criticized, and encouraged in conference sessions. Although most members of this association do not come from institutions that heavily support and encourage case writing, they have found the case method useful enough in their teaching to have banded together to encourage and help each other to develop current materials. This association also publishes a case research journal which uses a blind referee process to select and print the best of submitted cases. Cases published in the Case Research Journal may be photocopied for educational use without charge. Writing New Cases Finding leads for new cases, collecting the data, and writing and editing the material into a polished and useful case is a somewhat difficult and artful process. In my experience, people can be easily frustrated and confused by their first attempts to write usable cases. For those who stick with it and practice their case writing skills, there are rich rewards to be gained. In addition to learning a new professional skill, one must also overcome the criticism of some colleagues who may denounce case writing as a waste of time. They will cite the lack of generalizability that comes from a research sample of N = 1, the amount of time good case writing demands, and the lack of established case- oriented scholarly groups as reasons why one should not spend time writing cases. There are those who will agree, however, that well-researched and well-written descriptive cases can add significantly to a rigorous research agenda. In this view, descriptive case research is an important early step in the research process that often leads to the recognition of patterns and the formulation of testable hypotheses. Such field-based-research agendas, some agree, are more powerful than those that build exclusively from other academic work or from office-bound reflection. I agree with this latter position and encourage you to consider case development and writing as an integral part of your research activities rather than viewing it only as a teaching-based diversion from real research. The topic of case writing invites a number of important questions: Where can one find leads? What kind of case should one write? How should one structure the case? What kind of data should one include? How can one revise cases? How can cases be disseminated? and many more related queries. We will consider each of the questions in turn. -3- UVA-PHA-0033 Finding Leads For the new case writer, one of the most daunting aspects of case writing can be finding companies that will allow one to come in, collect data, write up, and use a teaching case. It is often easier to get research cases, since those are more easily disguised and less discussed in the classroom. In either case, the following are some suggestions for developing case leads. One of the most productive sources of cases is the executive education program participant, who will often describe a problem to an instructor after class; these problems can easily develop into case-writing opportunities. Other sources may be found among old friends and colleagues from previous businesses or educational programs; casual conversation can reveal a situation that could make an excellent educational case. Company or individual cold calls or following up on situations outlined in the press or literature are less productive. These no-advance-contact situations make it difficult to develop the kind of relationship that is essential for developing a case lead. Case-writing relationship There are several key elements in the case-writing relationship that must be understood and managed in order for the experience to be positive for both parties. The most important issue is credibility. If the case subjects don’t trust your skills or abilities, they will be unlikely to invite you to come in. Early negotiations, therefore, should include a discussion of your experience, your training and schooling, your writing skills, and any other information that will give the subject a sense of confidence in you. You also need to address the question of confidentiality. Anonymity should be complete until the final version of the case is signed off and released by the appropriate officer in the organization. Any data not included in the case must be carefully destroyed or sequestered away so that it will not violate the confidentiality of the relationship. When one approaches a new case-writing opportunity, it is best at the outset to make clear and explicit to those involved that all data collected will be held in confidence and that the subject of the case will have control of all data until he has reviewed, revised, and signed a release form on the final version of the case. Anything less, in my opinion, is a violation of professional ethics and greatly undermines the ability of the case writer to secure case leads. Since control of collected case data and of whether or not the case will be released lies in the hands of the case subject, one occasionally is confronted with a situation where a time-consuming, developed case will not be released. At the last minute, the material may seem to be too current or too sensitive to the subject. Therefore, it is a good idea to negotiate clearly at the outset what the case will be about, what kind of data will be in it, what the tone will be, and so on, so that you can secure a preliminary approval of not only the project but of a reasonable description of what the final case will look like. I remember one situation in which I worked with an individual on a case that described his relationship with his superior officer at a previous employer. Although we had been colleagues at the time and the case was not unduly sensitive from my point of view, he wouldn’t release it. I waited a couple of years and revised the case to make it less direct, but he still wouldn’t -4- UVA-PHA-0033 release it. Clearly, something was sensitive to him. We negotiated for a decade before I finally became convinced that the person would never release the case and any further efforts on it would be wasted. In a similar experience, I worked at the invitation of one company to develop an extensive case on their management style. The data collected involved careful note-taking and tape-recorded interviews with 25 senior executives. We transcribed each interview, picked out the parts we wanted to use, sent the excerpts to each individual, got their release, and then compiled the overall case.