Original Article KLK4 Is Synchronically Expressed to CTSC in Ameloblasts During Amelogenesis Molars
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2017;10(5):5751-5757 www.ijcep.com /ISSN:1936-2625/IJCEP0047909 Original Article KLK4 is synchronically expressed to CTSC in ameloblasts during amelogenesis molars Lijie Wang1,2*, Xiaohua Xie1*, Yunduan Sun3, Jingyu Wang1, Yan Wang1, Xiumei Wang1 1Department of Stomatology, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China; 2Department of Stomatology, General Hospital of Daqing Oil Field, Daqing, Heilongjiang Prov- ince, China; 3The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China. *Equal contributors. Received January 2, 2017; Accepted January 27, 2017; Epub May 1, 2017; Published May 15, 2017 Abstract: The aim of this study was to provide the evidence that the CTSC product, DPPI is the activator of KLK4 dur- ing amelogenesis by examining the expression pattern of KLK4 and CTSC in developing teeth. The 1st mandibular molars from E16.5 embryos and postnatal mice, and incisor from P5 mandibles were selected for the immunohisto- chemistry with antibodies against KLK4 and DPPI. The expression of KLK4 and CTSC were initiated from postnatal day 1 (P1) expressed in molar ameloblasts. From P5 on, KLK4 was distributed not only in ameloblasts, but also in the degenerating satellite reticulum of molar enamel organ. However, DPPI distribution is always restricted to the molar ameloblasts. In the P5 incisor, the distribution of KLK4 and DPPI were spatiotemporally consistent in the ameloblasts. The coincidence of KLK4 and DPPI distribution in ameloblasts strongly suggested that DPPI activated KLK4. The distribution of KLK4 in satellite reticulum suggested that KLK4 most likely plays a proteolytic role in degeneration of enamel organ. Keywords: Amelogenesis, DPPI, KLK4, CTSC, papillon-lefèvre syndrome Introduction leukotoxin from anaerobic pathogens [6]. These findings explained how and why the mutations Papillon-Lefèvre syndrome (PLS) is a rare of CTSC or the loss of DPPI lead to hyperkerato- autosomal recessive disorder characterized by sis, prepubertal periodontitis and premature palmoplantar hyperkeratosis, prepubertal peri- tooth loss in PLS. However, not all of the mani- odontitis and premature loss of both deciduous festations in PLS patients or CTSC deficient and permanent teeth. The mutations of Cathe- mice was verified to result from this mecha- psin C gene (CTSC) are attributed to PLS [1]. A nism. For example, micro-hardness testing con- cysteine lysosomal protease belonging to the firmed that the enamel ofCTSC knock-out mice papaya superfamily is encoded by CTSC, name- is significantly softened compared with the nor- ly dipeptidyl-peptidase I (DPPI) which hydrolyz- mal littermates [7]. Whether the serine prote- es proteins or peptides in lysosomes by its ase activity of DPPI contributes to the soft endopeptidase and carboxypeptidase activities enamel of CTSC deficient mice is an attracting [2, 3]. In PLS patients, dysfunction of DPPI concern in PLS study. decreases protein degradation resulting in hy- perkeratosis [4]. Meanwhile, DDPI also plays a Ameloblasts produce matrix metalloprotein- key role in activating chymotrypin-like serine ase-20 (MMP20) for matrix processing during proteases by removing one or more N-terminal the secretory stage of amelogenesis, while se- dipeptides from zymogen [5]. PLS patients ex- cret the serine proteinase, Kallikrein-4 (KLK4) hibited reduced activities of polymorphonucle- during the transition and mature stages of ame- ar leukocyte (PMN)-derived serine proteinases, logenesis [8]. The absence or insufficiency of such as elastase, cathepsin G and proteinase MMP20 and KLK4 were demonstrated to cause 3, which in turn decreased the production of amelogenesis imperfect in both human and antimicrobial peptide and the neutralization of mouse [9-12]. Since expressed in late stages KLK4 and CTSC in ameloblasts and responsible for the ultimate removal of matrix proteins from enamel rods, the activity of KLK4 is regarded more critical for enam- el maturation and hardness [10, 12]. KLK4 is produced in a pre- pro-enzyme form in endoplasm reticulum, secreted into extracel- lular space as a pro-enzyme after the removal of signal peptide, and transformed into active serine proteinase by cutting N-terminal propeptide off [13-15]. However, the extracellular activator of KLK4 is still unknown. Although MMP20 could activate KLK4 in vitro, their short overlap during amelogene- sis and the activation of KLK4 in MMP20 knock-out mice revealed that the in vivo activation of KLK4 is performed by enzymes other than MMP20 [16]. As a serine proteinase activating extracellular zymogens, DPPI was found to be secreted into extra- cellular space [17]. Since the re- duced hardness of enamel was detected in both CTSC and KLK4 deficiency mice [7], DPPI was pro- posed as the activator of KLK4 during amelogenesis. Examining the expression pattern of CTSC and KLK4 during amelogenesis is the first step to verify this hypoth- esis. Only when the expression of KLK4 is spatiotemporally consis- tent with that of CTSC, the possi- bility of DPPI activating KLK4 can be established. Materials and methods Animals and tissue preparations All the experiments were approv- ed by animal ethics committee of Harbin medical university and co- nducted in accordance with the Figure 1. KLK4 expression in mouse molar germs. The immunohisto- requirements of ethics commit- chemistry results of KLK4 expression for P1 (A1, A2), P5 (B1, B2), P74 tee. C57/BL6 male and female (C1, C2), P9 (D1, D2), P11 (E1, E2) and P14 (F1, F2), respectively. (A1- mice was mating and the morning F1) are images at the magnitude of 200 folds; (A2-F2) are the magnified images at 400 folds of the corresponding boxes in (A1-F1). (Am: amelo- vaginal plug appeared was record- blasts; Od: odontoblast; SR: satellite reticulum; the scale bar in (A1-F1) ed as embryonic day 0.5 (E0.5) to stands for 200 µm and in (A2-F2) for 20 µm). get E16.5 embryos. The pregnant 5752 Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2017;10(5):5751-5757 KLK4 and CTSC in ameloblasts mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and the embryonic mandibles were fixed in 4% poly- formaldehyde for 24 h at 4°C. For postnatal tissue preparation, the mandibles were separated from the mice after 10% chloral hydra- te intraperitoneal anesthesia and fixed in 4% polyformaldehyde for 24 h at 4°C. Then, the postnatal mandibles were put into 8% EDTA for decalcification. Both the em- bryonic and postnatal mandibles were dehydrated by gradient et- hanol and embedded in paraffin after xylene treatment. All sam- ples were sectioned into 4 um slices, adhered to polylysine am- monia acid treated slides, dried at 37°C and finally treated at 70°C oven overnight. Antibodies For immunohistochemical exami- nation, rabbit polyclonal antibody against KLK4 (Biorbyt, CA, USA) and rat polyclonal antibody ag- ainst DPPI were applied (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Secondary antibo- dies against rabbit and rat conju- gated with horseradish peroxi- dase were purchased from ZSGB- BIO Inc, Beijing, China. Immunohistochemistry Paraffin sections were deparaf- finized in xylene and rehydrated with gradient alcohol. Endogenous peroxidase was inactivated in 3% hydrogen peroxide at room tem- perature for 10 minutes. Then, the sections were rinsed with distilled water and placed in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) for 5 minutes. Sections citrate sustained-release -2 Figure 2. CTSC expression and DPPI distribution in mouse molar germs. liquid (PH6.0, 10 M) were heated The immunohistochemistry results of DPPI distribution in P1 (A1, A2), by microwave for antigen retrieval P5 (B1, B2), P7 (C1, C2), P9 (D1, D2), P11 (E1, E2) and P14 (F1, F2), (high heat for 2 minutes, and then respectively. (A1-F1) are images at the magnitude of 200 folds; (A2-F2) low heat for 5 minutes for KLK4; are the magnified images at 400 folds of the corresponding boxes in (A1-F1). (Am: ameloblasts; Od: odontoblasts; SR: satellite reticulum; the high heat for 5 minutes for DPPI). scale bar in (A1-F1) stands for 200 um and in (A2-F2) for 20 um). After cooled down to room tem- 5753 Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2017;10(5):5751-5757 KLK4 and CTSC in ameloblasts Figure 3. KLK4 expression and DPPI distribution in mouse P5 incisor.The KLK4 immunohistochemistry results in P5 incisor (A). KLK4 distribution in mature (A1), secretory (A2) and pre-secretory stage (A3), respectively. The DPPI immunohistochemistry results in P5 incisor (B). DPPI distribution in mature (B1), secretory (B2) and pre-secretory stage (B3), respectively. (A, B) are images at the magnitude of 200 folds; (A1-A3 and B1-B3) are the magnified images at 400 folds of the corresponding boxes in (A and B). (Am: ameloblasts; Od: odontoblast; *: mesenchyme adjacent to cervical loop; the scale bar in (A and B) stands for 200 um and in A1-A3 and B1-B3 for 10 um). perature and rinsed with PBS, the sections 4°C. Then, the sections were rinsed with PBS were blocked with bovine serum for 20 min and and incubated with secondary antibody for 20 subsequently incubated with KLK4 antibody min at room temperature before develop the (1:100) or DPPI antibody (1:50) overnight at color with freshly prepared DAB. 5754 Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2017;10(5):5751-5757 KLK4 and CTSC in ameloblasts Results Distributions of KLK4 and DPPI in postnatal incisor Distribution of KLK4 in developing molar germs The P5 incisors which contain ameloblasts from progenitor to mature status were applied The immunohistochemistry examinations sh- to the examination of the KLK4 and CTSC own that at the E16.5 day, neither the pre-ame- expression. In the para-sagittal section of the loblasts nor pre-odontoblasts of the mouse P5 incisor, the KLK4 expression was initiated molar germs exhibited the KLK4 expression the pre-secretory ameloblasts which started (data not shown). In the 1st molar at P1, the the polarization to transform into high colum- KLK4 expression was first detected in the ame- nar morphology (Figure 3A and 3A3).