DOCSLIB.ORG

Cryptozoologicon: Volume I Cryptozoologicon: Volume I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cryptozoologicon: Volume I Cryptozoologicon: Volume I (Download pdf ebook) Cryptozoologicon: Volume I Cryptozoologicon: Volume I 0ohWYeTps Cryptozoologicon: Volume I CIqMBJDBD GT-45522 PmAJysrjl USmix/Data/US-2013 uGpZ5g0xJ 3.5/5 From 353 Reviews M2L60TlqF John Conway, C. M. Kosemen, Darren Naish tlVxNUM7B DOC | *audiobook | ebooks | Download PDF | ePub YYS7gqrCH CphlupWG8 PD02vpgOx luHTWxpZq lMELCQG6X rMGRQvmNK YRVEWqfTG nKHf5MTS4 16 of 17 people found the following review helpful. Cryptozoology finally gets eYVnIGJXh the treatment it deservesBy Cameron A. McCormickCryptozoology claims to be NMqsqoGWY a lot of things normally something along the lines of searching for "hidden" or sjwVc6whE "unexpected" animals but effectively it's the art of taking anecdotes and even I8KQou2XV softer evidence way too seriously. For a practice purportedly focused on LI5xo5bHq discovery, cryptozoology is ironically hyper-conservative and tends to rehash t7JsNRhH2 the same old information and hypotheses even if they've been shown to be MJCRv0ETY improbable, wrong or fake. While cryptozoology has been stuck in a purgatory- 2WUbxrDBg like existence since the 1960's, people eschewing or unaware of that label have 51l6CTNhs been going around discovering new and sometimes large and exciting species, AUEzkKESM even when initially starting from soft evidence like anecdotes.Just because 6gIXbjepg cryptozoology is (largely) an unintentionally serious study of mythical creatures yswE7wmN7 doesn't make it worthless. The thing is, lots of the cryptids are really e2RYboWTn compelling. Some of my favorite monsters are cryptozoological creations. 8UPhJRCSp Cryptids are at their most interesting when they're decoupled from any pretense of being real and treated as speculative modern folklore. Which is what the Cryptozoologicon does.It's been a while since I've been as excited about a book as the Cryptozoologicon. It covers 28 cryptids ranging from ubiquitous in pop culture (Bigfoot, Yeti) to hyper-obscure (Con Rit, Tizheruk); from teetering-on- plausible (Orang Pendek) to freakishly crazy (Kelpie?! Goatman?!?!) to known mistakes (Zuiyo Maru carcass, Rods). Each of these cryptids is treated to one beautiful illustration (and sometimes other figures) and a trifid discussion: a review of the available information, a skeptical analysis of the information, and then a speculative treatment. Occasionally the speculation becomes so wild the authors break down into the sort of madness hitherto found only in Lovecraft's epistolary heroes, ranting and raving in a style curiously similar to that espoused by the Internet's less coherent cryptozoologists.Summarizing a book covering so many topics isn't easy, so I'll look at one cryptid that I feel was treated in an extra-clever way: the Mbielu-Mbielu-Mbielu. Previously, it was the world's stupidest cryptid; a rogue microbiologist named Roy Mackal went to equatorial Africa and somebody (not an eyewitness, apparently) pointed to a picture of a stegosaur in a book and gave it a name. Mackal's conclusion about a semi-aquatic extant stegosaur is just word salad-y nonsense (and yes, I've read his book), but some people continue on treating it as a valid concept! The Cryptozoologicon out-speculates the speculators. Why a stegosaur and not a fish known as a bichir? They already have numerous bifid dorsal fins, can breathe air, unexpectedly tetrapod-like limbs (more so than lungfish and coelacanths... long story), and have reached huge sizes in the past. They seem all set to evolve into semi-aquatic pseudo-stegosaurs! Of course the authors of the Cryptozoologicon don't actually *believe* this, it's just a fun and exceedingly clever alternative.The Cryptozoologicon doesn't always speculate wildly, but this doesn't make the cryptids any less compelling. It's pretty light and very fun and the best approach to cryptozoology I've ever encountered.6 of 6 people found the following review helpful. Top notch Illustrations, combined with skepticism and speculative fiction.By Tim MorrisThrough my long obsession with Cryptozoology, it pains me that even the best, most comprehensive books on the subject have little in the way of original, high quality illustrations. Many describe the entities well in the text, enough to give a mental picture, but the majority of cryptozoology books are compendiums of information on the subject, compiling sightings and hypotheses about these mystery creatures. Even the greats such as Sanderson and Heuvelmans are very sparse with proper illustrations, the illustrations in Bernard Heuvelman's books are so forgettably plain that they are not noteworthy.One problem is, that many current cryptozoologists do not have the proper funding to employ many artists. Loren Coleman is a notable exception in having one or two devoted illustrators that have provided many, many black and white depictions. I myself produce cryptozoology illustrations for some clients, but I am paid in merchandise (complimentary copies of the books), simply because I have a thirst for crypto books in the first place.It is unfortunate that I can count on one hand, the books about Cryptozoology that posses truly striking, original artwork. One of which is a very lavish children's book, one is the skeptical tome "Abominable Science", one is Loren Coleman's Hominoid Field Guide, and one very exhaustive French handbook that was never released in English. The 2 recent books about sea monsters on renaissance and medieval maps also warrant inclusion, but their illustrations are historical documents, not originals."The Cryptozoologicon: Volume 1", which will soon have a sequel, instantly rockets to the top of this list.Each creature entry, of which there are 28, provides a truly beautiful, realistic color portrait of each cryptid. Accompanying this are 3 sections of text per entry. The first is about the sightings and general context, the next is a skeptical paragraph about the likelihood or lack thereof, to its existence, and the third is a piece of speculative fiction as to the nature of the creature, as if it were actually real. The book takes pains to point out that they do not endorse the un-supported existence of any folkoloric creatures, in fact, some cryptids covered in the book are either disproved, false, or fake. The main point of the book is not the investigative nature of many crypto books, but viewing this modern mythological bestiary as what in most cases, it truly is, creative exercises in speculative thought.After a long love-affair with Cryptozoology, this book has brought me to an epiphany. The fact that these mystery beasts probably do not exist, is not really a bad thing, nor is it a smirch on the reputation of any cryptozoologists. It isn't a bad thing, because the sightings, investigation, and resulting speculation have become a contemporary equivalent of the long-gone annals of Greek and Medieval mythology. That is, of course, perhaps not real, but damn good storytelling. Creatures seemingly exist in our minds and collective conscious, as much as the material, natural world.I eagerly await the second edition, which will be a sequel. apparently the author and illustrators became so enthused with their speculative ramblings, that they will soon have enough for a second book. Sooner rather than later, I hope.4 of 4 people found the following review helpful. Cryptozoology - as science and as gloriously preposterous speculationBy Sharon HillThis is Volume One. More volumes are possibly on the way (at least one more). The authors seemed to have great fun with this one.The introduction is cryptozoology in a nutshell, with a smart, skeptical, scholarly point of view - the kind I prefer. Each entry is a summary of what is known or conjectured about the cryptid. Then the authors crank up the fictional biology to 11 and even push the limits of popular cryptozoo-ers, while remaining generally within the confines of zoology, to indulge in descriptions and illustrations of the proposed animals.There is no "belief" or religiously fed need by these authors to PROVE this or that animal is real. It's straight zoology blended with art, folklore and a creativity fueled by love of this topic. This book is a few reading levels above your average pop cryptid book, which is good, I think. There is nothing bad about raising the bar.The Cryptozoologicon picks at the foundation of the field and finds it rather holey. They advocate a new approach to the subject - a more rigorous, rational, less ridiculous approach. However...parts of The Cryptozoologicon are very very silly. That was clearly the intent. The hoop snake makes an appearance. The chupacabra becomes a very large opossum called "Deinoroo"; only a matter of time, they say, until it graduates from attacking livestock to targeting humans. I enjoyed the treatment of "rods" as the most ridiculous of all proposed cryptids; the resulting speculative animal turns out to be gloriously preposterous. This is speculative zoology at its finest. Cryptozoologicon is a celebration of the myths, legends, evolution and biology of hidden animals. Always sceptical, but always willing to indulge in speculative fun, Cryptozoologicon aims to provide a new way to approach cryptozoology: as fictional biology..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cryptozoologicon: Volume I Online
    PYrNA (Free and download) Cryptozoologicon: Volume I Online [PYrNA.ebook] Cryptozoologicon: Volume I Pdf Free John Conway, C. M. Kosemen, Darren Naish ePub | *DOC | audiobook | ebooks | Download PDF Download Now Free Download Here Download eBook #506077 in Books Darren Naish C M Kosemen John Conway 2013-11-07Original language:EnglishPDF # 1 8.50 x .26 x 8.50l, .44 #File Name: 1291621539102 pagesCryptozoologicon Volume I | File size: 48.Mb John Conway, C. M. Kosemen, Darren Naish : Cryptozoologicon: Volume I before purchasing it in order to gage whether or not it would be worth my time, and all praised Cryptozoologicon: Volume I: 16 of 17 people found the following review helpful. Cryptozoology finally gets the treatment it deservesBy Cameron A. McCormickCryptozoology claims to be a lot of things — normally something along the lines of searching for "hidden" or "unexpected" animals — but effectively it's the art of taking anecdotes and even softer evidence way too seriously. For a practice purportedly focused on discovery, cryptozoology is ironically hyper-conservative and tends to rehash the same old information and hypotheses even if they've been shown to be improbable, wrong or fake. While cryptozoology has been stuck in a purgatory-like existence since the 1960's, people eschewing or unaware of that label have been going around discovering new and sometimes large and exciting species, even when initially starting from soft evidence like anecdotes.Just because cryptozoology is (largely) an unintentionally serious study of mythical creatures doesn't make it worthless. The thing is, lots of the cryptids are really compelling. Some of my favorite monsters are cryptozoological creations.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Palaeoart
    Palaeontologia Electronica http://palaeo-electronica.org State of the Palaeoart Mark P. Witton, Darren Naish, and John Conway The discipline of palaeoart, a branch of natural history art dedicated to the recon- struction of extinct life, is an established and important component of palaeontological science and outreach. For more than 200 years, palaeoartistry has worked closely with palaeontological science and has always been integral to the enduring popularity of prehistoric animals with the public. Indeed, the perceived value or success of such products as popular books, movies, documentaries, and museum installations can often be linked to the quality and panache of its palaeoart more than anything else. For all its significance, the palaeoart industry ment part of this dialogue in the published is often poorly treated by the academic, media and literature, in turn bringing the issues concerned to educational industries associated with it. Many wider attention. We argue that palaeoartistry is standard practises associated with palaeoart pro- both scientifically and culturally significant, and that duction are ethically and legally problematic, stifle improved working practises are required by those its scientific and cultural growth, and have a nega- involved in its production. We hope that our views tive impact on the financial viability of its creators. inspire discussion and changes sorely needed to These issues create a climate that obscures the improve the economy, quality and reputation of the many positive contributions made by palaeoartists palaeoart industry and its contributors. to science and education, while promoting and The historic, scientific and economic funding derivative, inaccurate, and sometimes exe- significance of palaeoart crable artwork.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Number 69
    The Palaeontology Newsletter Contents 69 Association Business 2 Association Meetings 9 Progressive Palaeontology 12 News 13 From our correspondents Here be dragons 17 For a very specialized audience only 23 PalaeoMath 101: Size & shape coords 26 Meeting Reports 37 Mystery Fossils 14 & 15 (and 13) 64 Future meetings of other bodies 67 Reporter: Reviewing peer review 71 Sylvester-Bradley Reports 77 Soapbox: On the mathematics of life 83 Book Reviews 88 Special Papers 79 & 80 104–107 Palaeontology vol 51 parts 5 & 6 108–110 Reminder: The deadline for copy for Issue no 70 is 23rd February 2009. On the Web: <http://www.palass.org/> ISSN: 0954-9900 Newsletter 69 2 Association Business Annual Meeting Notification is given of the 53rd Annual General Meeting and Annual Address This will be held at the University of Glasgow on 20th December 2008, following the scientific sessions. Please note that following the October Council meeting, an additional item has been added to the agenda published in Newsletter 68. Agenda 1. Apologies for absence 2. Minutes of the 52nd AGM, University of Uppsala 3. Annual Report for 2007 (published in Newsletter 68) 4. Accounts and Balance Sheet for 2007 (published in Newsletter 68) 5. Increase in annual subscriptions 6. Election of Council and vote of thanks to retiring members 7. Palaeontological Association Awards 8. Annual address H. A. Armstrong Secretary DRAFT AGM MINUTES 2007 Minutes of the Annual General Meeting held on Monday, 17th December 2007 at the University of Uppsala. 1. Apologies for absence: Prof. Batten; Prof. J. C. W. Cope; Dr P.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of the Microvertebrate Fauna of the Early Cretaceous (Barremian) Wessex Formation of the Isle of Wight, Southern England
    ASPECTS OF THE MICROVERTEBRATE FAUNA OF THE EARLY CRETACEOUS (BARREMIAN) WESSEX FORMATION OF THE ISLE OF WIGHT, SOUTHERN ENGLAND By STEVEN CHARLES SWEETMAN M.A. (Oxon.) 1980 F.G.S. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Portsmouth School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Burnaby Building, Burnaby Road, Portsmouth, PO1 3QL, U.K. April, 2007 0 Disclaimer Whilst registered for this degree, I have not registered for any other award. No part of this work has been submitted for any other academic award. 1 Acknowledgements At inception of this project there was a significant risk that the Wessex Formation would not yield a microvertebrate fauna. I would, therefore, like to express special thanks to Dave Martill (University of Portsmouth) for his initial support and for securing the research scholarship which made this study possible. I would also like to thank him for his supervision, generous support, encouragement and advice thereafter. Special thanks also to Susan Evans (UCL) for her enthusiastic help and advice on all matters relating to microvertebrates in general, and lizards in particular, and to Jerry Hooker (NHM) for everything relating to mammals; also to Brian Gasson for his support in the field and for the generous donation of many exceptional specimens from his private collection. The broad scope of this study has engendered the help, support and advice of many others and I am grateful to all. At the University
    [Show full text]
  • The Palaeontology Newsletter
    The Palaeontology Newsletter Contents 90 Editorial 2 Association Business 3 Association Meetings 11 News 14 From our correspondents Legends of Rock: Marie Stopes 22 Behind the scenes at the Museum 25 Kinds of Blue 29 R: Statistical tests Part 3 36 Rock Fossils 45 Adopt-A-Fossil 48 Ethics in Palaeontology 52 FossilBlitz 54 The Iguanodon Restaurant 56 Future meetings of other bodies 59 Meeting Reports 64 Obituary: David M. Raup 79 Grant and Bursary Reports 81 Book Reviews 103 Careering off course! 111 Palaeontology vol 58 parts 5 & 6 113–115 Papers in Palaeontology vol 1 parts 3 & 4 116 Virtual Palaeontology issues 4 & 5 117–118 Annual Meeting supplement >120 Reminder: The deadline for copy for Issue no. 91 is 8th February 2016. On the Web: <http://www.palass.org/> ISSN: 0954-9900 Newsletter 90 2 Editorial I watched the press conference for the publication on the new hominin, Homo naledi, with rising incredulity. The pomp and ceremony! The emotion! I wondered why all of these people were so invested just because it was a new fossil species of something related to us in the very recent past. What about all of the other new fossil species that are discovered every day? I can’t imagine an international media frenzy, led by deans and vice chancellors amidst a backdrop of flags and flashbulbs, over a new species of ammonite. Most other fossil discoveries and publications of taxonomy are not met with such fanfare. The Annual Meeting is a time for sharing these discoveries, many of which will not bring the scientists involved international fame, but will advance our science and push the boundaries of our knowledge and understanding.
    [Show full text]
  • The Palaeontology Newsletter
    The Palaeontology Newsletter Contents100 Editorial 2 Association Business 3 Annual Meeting 2019 3 Awards and Prizes AGM 2018 12 PalAss YouTube Ambassador sought 24 Association Meetings 25 News 30 From our correspondents A Palaeontologist Abroad 40 Behind the Scenes: Yorkshire Museum 44 She married a dinosaur 47 Spotlight on Diversity 52 Future meetings of other bodies 55 Meeting Reports 62 Obituary: Ralph E. Chapman 67 Grant Reports 72 Book Reviews 104 Palaeontology vol. 62 parts 1 & 2 108–109 Papers in Palaeontology vol. 5 part 1 110 Reminder: The deadline for copy for Issue no. 101 is 3rd June 2019. On the Web: <http://www.palass.org/> ISSN: 0954-9900 Newsletter 100 2 Editorial This 100th issue continues to put the “new” in Newsletter. Jo Hellawell writes about our new President Charles Wellman, and new Publicity Officer Susannah Lydon gives us her first news column. New award winners are announced, including the first ever PalAss Exceptional Lecturer (Stephan Lautenschlager). (Get your bids for Stephan’s services in now; check out pages 34 and 107.) There are also adverts – courtesy of Lucy McCobb – looking for the face of the Association’s new YouTube channel as well as a call for postgraduate volunteers to join the Association’s outreach efforts. But of course palaeontology would not be the same without the old. Behind the Scenes at the Museum returns with Sarah King’s piece on The Yorkshire Museum (York, UK). Norman MacLeod provides a comprehensive obituary of Ralph Chapman, and this issue’s palaeontologists abroad (Rebecca Bennion, Nicolás Campione and Paige dePolo) give their accounts of life in Belgium, Australia and the UK, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Sources and Monster Historiography
    Notes on Sources and Monster Historiography Those who searched for manlike monsters in the twentieth century— not as metaphors, but as flesh and blood organisms—have gone largely overlooked by academic historians of science. This field, as with cryp- tozoology in general, became the domain of independent amateur chroniclers producing a range of works of varying quality.1 An excel- lent explanation of what cryptozoology attempts to do is found in Chad Arment’s Cryptozoology: Science and Speculation.2 Since the 1960s, scholarly works on anomalous primates, and cryptids in gen- eral, look to place them in the realm of legend and myth: creations of the human mind rather than of evolution.3 These works tend to fall under what Jeffrey Cohen called “monster theory.”4 Works taking an empirical, physical anthropology approach include Gill, Meldrum, and Bindernagel.5 Recent writings have begun to address the lives of the monster hunters, but follow the tradition of focusing on the folkloric and pop culture nature of Bigfoot rather than on the natural history element, and not on the place of cryptozoology in the context of the history of science. This category tends to lean to the exposé or dismissive side.6 Of use to the discussion of monsters in general are scholarly works that attempt to put studies of human monsters into the history of biological systemization and classification.7 A number of methodological issues need to be addressed in the historiography of anomalous primate studies. There are papers col- lections of leading researchers. Grover Krantz, Bernard Heuvelmans, and Ivan Sanderson have accessible materials, as do Carleton Coon and George Agogino.
    [Show full text]
  • George F. Engelmann, Dept. of Geography & Geology, University Of
    PA13C-0242 T. rex and Godzilla: Finding Science in Science Fiction George F. Engelmann, Dept. of Geography & Geology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182, [email protected] & Daniel J. Chure, Dinosaur National Monument (ret.), Director of the Dinosaur Film Society, Jensen, UT 84035 Abstract Works of fiction act as a powerful vehicle for inculcating an intuitive understanding (or misunderstanding) of scientific concepts in the audience. They can com- municate information about scientific phenomena or how science is done. These entertainments can contribute to scientific literacy of the public and provide valua- The Problem/Opportunity Real Objects of Science Fiction: Dinosaurs ble outreach opportunities, but scientific accuracy is rarely even a minor consideration in developing fictional stories. Science educators can still make use of popu- Stories, whether based in reality or wholly fictional, have a powerful educational impact. Science fiction and fantasy, especially when enhanced by sophisticated, Real objects of scientific study, whether material or conceptual, are the hallmark of science fiction. Sometimes they are essential to the story through action or lar fiction to promote science education and outreach. computer-generated visual effects, is an increasingly popular genre that reaches a huge audience of children and adults. The intuitive reality of the objects and events constraints, sometimes just the MacGuffin around which the story unfolds. Dinosaurs are very popular in this role and appear frequently in fictional stories. Varied approaches have focused on the physical science in classic space operas, but historical sciences can make use of public interest in fictional tales involving portrayed can present a significant potential problem for science education, but can also be seen as an opportunity to introduce real science to the audience whose in- Dinosaurs are inherently interesting.
    [Show full text]
  • How Many Extant Pinniped Species Remain to Be Described? Michael A
    This article was downloaded by: [Mr Darren Naish] On: 21 August 2012, At: 09:12 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Historical Biology: An International Journal of Paleobiology Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ghbi20 How many extant pinniped species remain to be described? Michael A. Woodley a , Darren Naish b & Hugh P. Shanahan c a School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK b School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 3QL, UK c Department of Computer Science, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK Version of record first published: 30 Jun 2009 To cite this article: Michael A. Woodley, Darren Naish & Hugh P. Shanahan (2008): How many extant pinniped species remain to be described?, Historical Biology: An International Journal of Paleobiology, 20:4, 225-235 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08912960902830210 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources.
    [Show full text]
  • In-Depth Film Guide for Teachers (PDF)
    Short Film Great Transitions: The Origin of Birds Educator Materials IN-DEPTH FILM GUIDE DESCRIPTION In the short film Great Transitions: The Origin of Birds (http://www.hhmi.org/biointeractive/great- transitions-origin-birds), we join University of Texas paleontologist Dr. Julia Clarke on a journey to uncover the evidence that birds are a lineage of theropod dinosaurs. The film illustrates many of the practices of science, including asking important questions, formulating and testing hypotheses, analyzing and interpreting evidence, and revising explanations as new evidence becomes available. KEY CONCEPTS A. Species descend from other species. Any two species or groups of organisms, no matter how distantly related, can be traced back to a common ancestor. B. The fossil record provides a history of life on Earth. It includes organisms with features that are intermediate, or transitional, between major groups. C. One way scientists infer evolutionary relationships is by exploring patterns in the presence or absence of certain morphological traits in different species. D. Evidence that birds are descended from theropod dinosaurs includes shared anatomical features, as well as inferred physiological and behavioral similarities. E. The transition from dinosaurs on the ground to birds flying in the air did not happen in a sudden leap, nor did it happen in a linear, step-by-step progression. F. Feathers evolved before flight and therefore must have originally served other functions, such as insulation or communication. Traits that serve one function can be co-opted for a different function through evolution. G. Today, dinosaurs are classified into two groups: avian and non-avian.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fossil Record of Bird Behaviour D
    bs_bs_bannerJournal of Zoology Journal of Zoology. Print ISSN 0952-8369 The fossil record of bird behaviour D. Naish Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK Keywords Abstract birds; Avialae; fossil; behaviour; palaeontology; ecomorphology. Between the Middle Jurassic and Holocene, birds evolved an enormous diversity of behaviours. The distribution and antiquity of these behaviours is difficult to Correspondence establish given a relatively poor fossil record. Rare crop, stomach and gut contents Darren Naish, Ocean and Earth Science, typically reveal diets consistent with morphology but stem-members of some National Oceanography Centre, lineages (including Cariamae and Coraciiformes) seem to have been different in Southampton ecology from their extant relatives. Most of our ideas about the behaviour of fossil University of Southampton, Southampton birds are based on analogy (with skull form, limb proportions and claw curvature SO14 3ZH, UK. being used to guide hypotheses). However, this has limitations given that some Email: [email protected] extinct taxa lack extant analogues and that some extant taxa do not behave as predicted by osteology. Reductionist methods have been used to test predation Editor: David Hone style and running ability in fossil taxa including moa, Gastornis and phorusrhacids. Virtually nothing is known of nesting and nest-building behaviour Received 18 July 2013; revised 11 but colonial nesting is known from the Cretaceous onwards. Rare vegetative nests December 2013; accepted 17 December demonstrate modern nest-building from the Eocene onwards. Ornamental 2013 rectrices indicate that sexually driven display drove some aspects of feather evo- lution and evidence for loud vocal behaviour and intraspecific combat is known doi:10.1111/jzo.12113 for some taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Cretaceous) of Southern England
    ARTICLE IN PRESS DTD 5 Cretaceous Research -- (2004) 1–9 www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes Europe’s largest dinosaur? A giant brachiosaurid cervical vertebra from the Wessex Formation (Early Cretaceous) of southern England Darren Naisha,*, David M. Martilla, David Cooperb, Kent A. Stevensc aSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3QL, UK bLittle Shate, Mill Lane, Brighstone, Newport, Isle of Wight PO30 4BU, UK cDepartment of Computer and Information Science, Deschutes Hall, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA Received 28 February 2002; accepted in revised form 14 July 2004 Abstract A single brachiosaurid sauropod cervical vertebra from the Wessex Formation (Barremian, Early Cretaceous) of the Isle of Wight is remarkable for its size. With a partial centrum length (i.e., excluding evidence of the anterior condyle) of 745 mm it represents the largest sauropod cervical reported from Europe and is close in size to cervical vertebrae of the giant brachiosaurid Brachiosaurus brancai from Late Jurassic Tanzania. The complete animal probably exceeded 20 m in total length. The specimen shares important morphological characters with Sauroposeidon proteles from Early Cretaceous USA, including extensive lateral fossae and well-developed posterior centroparapophyseal laminae, indicating that it is part of a Brachiosaurus–Sauroposeidon clade, and in some characters is intermediate between the two. Owing to the complexities of Isle of Wight sauropod taxonomy the specimen is not attributed to a named taxon. Ó 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Dinosauria; Sauropoda; Brachiosauridae; Brachiosaurus; Sauroposeidon; Early Cretaceous; Isle of Wight; England 1. Introduction The Wessex Formation (Barremian, Early Creta- ceous) of the Isle of Wight, southern England, is well Sauropod dinosaurs, the long-necked giants of the known for its diverse dinosaur fauna (Benton and Mesozoic, are well represented in the fossil record of Spencer, 1995; Hutt et al., 2001; Martill and Naish, Europe.
    [Show full text]