Pharmacogenomics—Is There a Role in Antibiotic Therapy?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pharmacogenomics—Is There a Role in Antibiotic Therapy? Pharmacogenomics—a role in antibiotic therapy? DB Davison et al 14 sist over long periods of time, and they there are inborn cohesive forces 1 Pinker S. How the Mind Works. WW Nor- cannot grow except by recruitment. which cause the different individ- ton & Company: New York, London, 1997, pp 1–528. In short, populations differ from uals within a population to coop- 2 Wynne Edwards WC. Evolution through each other because many of their erate sufficiently for the popu- group selection. Blackwell: Oxford, 1986. members tend to carry different lation to function as one 3 Wilson DS. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1975; 72: mutants; furthermore, it is the non- evolutionary unit. 143–146. 4 Wilson DS. Science 1997; 276: 1816–1817. uniformity of the individual members (2) As a second requirement, there 5 Wilson DS, Sober E. J Theor Biol 1989; 136: of a population which helps a popu- must be effective evolutionary dif- 337–356. lation to function as an effective ferences between individuals 6 Rice SH. J Theor Biol 1995; 177: 237–245. entity, and thereby to allow evolution- which at the same time make 7 Crognier E. Ann Hum Biol 2000; 27: 221– 237. ary competition. The situation is anal- every population different from 8 Michod RE, Roze D. Heredity 2001; 86:1–7. ogous to that of a complex organism other populations. The existence 9 Hamilton WD. J Theor Biol 1964; 7:1–52. which has different cells, but they col- of mutations assures the occur- 10 Maynard Smith J. Evolutionary Genetics (2nd laborate and form a living unit. Many rence of differences between indi- edn). Oxford University Press: Oxford, New York, Tokyo, 1998, pp 163–178. of the individual diversities in a popu- viduals as well as between popu- 11 Bradley BJ. Q Rev Biol 1999; 74: 171–194. lation are genetically controlled, as are lations. 12 Chomsky N. Chomsky’s Classic Works. Lang- the different cells of a multicellular uage and Responsibility and Reflections on Important in the current context is organism. Language. New Press: New York, 1998. the fact that it is genetic factors carried 13 Pinker S. Nature 1997; 387: 547–548. To allow evolutionary forces to by individuals which make it possible 14 Lorenz K. Evolution and Modification of favor, or to eliminate, either an indi- for populations to function as differ- Behavior. University of Chicago Press: vidual or a population, there are two Chicago, IL, 1971. ent evolutionary units. requirements applying to both these 15 Charrier I et al. Nature 2001; 412: 873. 16 Weimerskirch H et al. Nature 2001; 413: units of selection: DUALITY OF INTEREST 697–698. 292 (1) The first requirement is the pres- None declared. 17 Goldenberg J et al. Science 2001; : 2433. ence and function of cohesive 18 Seashore CE. Psychology of Music. Dover: Correspondence should be sent to forces; we are not surprised when New York, 1967. W Kalow, Department of Pharmacology, the cohesive forces between the 19 Boehm C. Curr Anthropol 1993; 34: 227– Medical Sciences Building, University of different cells of a multicellular 254. Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A8, Canada. 20 Kalow W. Pharmacogenetics 2001; 10:1–3. organism allow this organism to Tel: 416 978 2734 21 Siller S. Nature 2001; 411: 689–692. act as an individual. However, we Fax: 416 978 6395 also have to accept the fact that Email: w.kalowȰutoronto.ca of predictable outcomes from a study Pharmacogenomics—Is there a role of human genomes and their responses ex vivo to a particular phar- in antibiotic therapy? macological agent.2,3 Treatment of infectious diseases is a DB Davison1, TJ Dougherty2, JF Barrett3 and M Pucci1 bit of a therapeutic outlier. Ideally, one desires an agent that has no discern- 1Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Wallingford, CT, USA; 2Pfizer ible effects on the host of an infection, Global Research & Development, Groton, CT, USA; 3Merck Research Laboratories, while having lethal effects on the Rahway, NJ, USA invading organism. Neither of these ideals is ever achieved. When one thinks of pharmacogenomics in infec- The Pharmacogenomics Journal (2002) 2, and possibly adverse events that vary tious diseases, it is often in the context 14–16. DOI: 10.1038/sj/tpj/6500064 with the host’s repertoire of gene poly- of drug effects (P450 interactions, etc) 1 morphisms. Several of the most obvi- and seldom in terms of the microbial In its purest form, pharmacogenomics ous and well-discussed areas of pharm- population that the drug affects. Usu- is defined as the functional linkage of acogenomics potential have been ally this is couched in terms of a the science of human pharmacology, oncology, CNS disorders, and decision in prescribing of a drug to toxicology and genomics. This link is inflammation, where a pattern of gene which the patient may be allergic or somewhat artificial, and in its current expression (up- or down-regulation) prescribing a drug to which the patient usage, pharmacogenomics implies an may be monitored in response to a may have an adverse response due to association of some pharmacological given pharmacological agent. The ulti- aberrant metabolism because of, eg, agent with measurable host responses mate promise of pharmacogenomics is polymorphic variations in the The Pharmacogenomics Journal Pharmacogenomics—a role in antibiotic therapy? DB Davison et al 15 expression of the repertoire of human organisms. It has become clear that Another important pharmacogen- cytochromes. If a pharmacogenetic, or microbial populations, despite being omic measurement is the pathogen’s pharmacogenomic evaluation was largely clonal at the onset, can during response to both the host immune somehow instantaneously possible, an infection become heterogeneous in response and the antibiotic used to the drug of choice would be matched terms of, for example, antibiotic resist- suppress or kill it. The host response against the maximum compatibility of ance. Let’s consider the possible exam- can be assessed by its ability to invoke the host and maximal effect on the ination of antibiotic resistance by a a competent host immune response, infectious agent. pharmacogenomics analysis. There is both non-specific(ieRESsystem)and However, there may not be any evidence accumulating that differing specific (antibody or T-cell response). more significant effector of human environments (eg, in a host Gene markers can quantitatively pharmacology than the microbial compartment) and stress (eg, anti- measure all of these responses, but infection itself (bacterial, fungal and biotic treatment) can increase none at present immediately help viral). The cascade of gene expression mutation rates in bacteria.6 This popu- with diagnosis of infection or choice response to infection is diverse and lation heterogeneity, in turn, can lead of therapy. immense, affecting numerous human to increased rates of resistance devel- The bacterium’s response at the gen- host response genes including the opment and treatment failures. This omic level, however, may be a very complement cascade, general heterogeneity of bacterial populations direct and quick indicator of the resist- inflammation responses, febrile in an infection can become quite ance potential. For example, the response, the numerous immune marked; for example, a very high per- science of gene expression profiling response systems, and likely additional centage of mutators are found among (microarrays, etc) has evolved to the factors yet to be uncovered. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from point that, within a day or two, a com- human population heterogeneity can cystic fibrosis patients.7 plete time-sequence-based expression have an even more profound influence The predictive nature of data from a pattern of gene products could be on the outcome of infection. Con- pharmacogenomic evaluation of any assessed in bacteria. This would allow sider, for example, the presence of sin- given drug’s effects on a pathogen for contrasting the ‘normal’ and ‘drug gle-nucleotide polymorphisms in the could have a significantly greater affected’ bacterium to see what effects human population; these minor differ- impact than single point MIC drug treatment may have on the ences in certain genes are known to measurements. That is, a MIC deter- dynamics of the pathogen population. affect the outcome of the events asso- mines the ability of a drug to inhibit The ability of chips to detect single ciated with the gene products. A visible bacterial growth in a standard mismatches and expression levels of recent, well-publicized example is that assay, but does nothing to predict key resistance genes could be used of individuals naturally resistant to resistance potential, mode of inhi- both to detect resistance mutations, HIV.4 A mutation in the CD4 receptor bition (bactericidal or bacteristatic), and measure expression levels of resist- prevents the virus from binding, thus virulence, efflux, genes turned on or ance genes. If a profile of relevant preventing infection. Another off—all ‘genomics-measurable’ para- example is the recent discovery of meters that may better predict the out- mouse polymorphisms in the kif1C come of a given treatment regimen. gene that alter susceptibility of macro- But how could this work? The most phages to anthrax toxin.5 It is antici- straightforward way to proceed would pated that this genetic basis for be a ‘profiling’ of gene expression in anthrax susceptibility will extend to devising a pharmacogenomic evalu- man. The antimicrobials used to treat ation, most likely established initially pathogens may also affect the ‘pharm- by whole genome microarrays with a acogenomic’ response in humans significant contribution possible from indirectly by affecting the presen- proteomics. Effects normalized to tation of a pathogen to the human drug-free controls and normalization host (eg modification of the pathogen to growth rates of a pathogen may pro- surface or lytic events exposing bac- vide data in which a rapid diagnostic terial intracellular content).
Recommended publications
  • Clinical Pharmacology 1: Phase 1 Studies and Early Drug Development
    Clinical Pharmacology 1: Phase 1 Studies and Early Drug Development Gerlie Gieser, Ph.D. Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Div. IV Objectives • Outline the Phase 1 studies conducted to characterize the Clinical Pharmacology of a drug; describe important design elements of and the information gained from these studies. • List the Clinical Pharmacology characteristics of an Ideal Drug • Describe how the Clinical Pharmacology information from Phase 1 can help design Phase 2/3 trials • Discuss the timing of Clinical Pharmacology studies during drug development, and provide examples of how the information generated could impact the overall clinical development plan and product labeling. Phase 1 of Drug Development CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH PRE POST AND CLINICAL APPROVAL 1 DISCOVERY DEVELOPMENT 2 3 PHASE e e e s s s a a a h h h P P P Clinical Pharmacology Studies Initial IND (first in human) NDA/BLA SUBMISSION Phase 1 – studies designed mainly to investigate the safety/tolerability (if possible, identify MTD), pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an investigational drug in humans Clinical Pharmacology • Study of the Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) of the drug in humans – PK: what the body does to the drug (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion) – PD: what the drug does to the body • PK and PD profiles of the drug are influenced by physicochemical properties of the drug, product/formulation, administration route, patient’s intrinsic and extrinsic factors (e.g., organ dysfunction, diseases, concomitant medications,
    [Show full text]
  • An Update on ABCB1 Pharmacogenetics
    The Pharmacogenomics Journal (2011) 11, 315–325 & 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved 1470-269X/11 www.nature.com/tpj REVIEW An update on ABCB1 pharmacogenetics: insights from a 3D model into the location and evolutionary conservation of residues corresponding to SNPs associated with drug pharmacokinetics SJ Wolf1,6, M Bachtiar1,6, The human ABCB1 protein, (P-glycoprotein or MDR1) is a membrane-bound 1 2 3 glycoprotein that harnesses the energy of ATP hydrolysis to drive the J Wang , TS Sim , SS Chong unidirectional transport of substrates from the cytoplasm to the extracellular 1,4,5 and CGL Lee space. As a large range of therapeutic agents are known substrates of ABCB1 protein, its role in the onset of multidrug resistance has been the focus of 1Department of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of much research. This role has been of particular interest in the field of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; 2Department pharmacogenomics where genetic variation within the ABCB1 gene, of Microbiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, particularly in the form of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), is National University of Singapore, Singapore, believed to contribute to inter-individual variation in ABCB1 function and Singapore; 3Department of Pediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of drug response. In this review we provide an update on the influence of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; 4Division of coding region SNPs within the ABCB1 gene on drug pharmacokinetics. By Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre, utilizing the crystal structure of the mouse ABCB1 homolog (Abcb1a), which Singapore, Singapore and 5Duke-NUS Graduate is 87% homologous to the human sequence, we accompany this discussion Medical School, Singapore, Singapore with a graphical representation of residue location for amino acids Correspondence: corresponding to human ABCB1 coding region SNPs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Pharmacogenomics in Developing Countries
    The Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Pharmacogenomics in Developing Countries Report of an International Group of Experts Human Genetics Chronic Diseases and Health Promotion WHO Library CataloguinginPublication Data The ethical, legal and social implications of pharmacogenomics in developing countries : report of an international group of experts. "Preparation of this report was undertaken by Human Genetics, headed by Victor Boulyjenkov. Cathy Schapper (Monash University) had principal responsibility for researching, writing and editing the report ..."Acknowledgements. 1.Pharmacogenetics ethics. 2.Pharmacogenetics legislation. 3.Ethics, Pharmacy. 4.Patient rights. 5.Socioeconomic factors. 6.Legislation, Drug. 7.Developing countries. I.Boulyjenkov, Victor. II.Schapper, Cathy. III.World Health Organization. ISBN 978 92 4 159546 9 (NLM classification: QV 38) © World Health Organization 2007 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; email: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; email: [email protected]). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacogenomics to Predict Tumor Therapy Response: a Focus on ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters and Cytochromes P450
    Journal of Personalized Medicine Review Pharmacogenomics to Predict Tumor Therapy Response: A Focus on ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters and Cytochromes P450 Viktor Hlaváˇc 1,2,* , Petr Holý 1,2,3 and Pavel Souˇcek 1,2 1 Toxicogenomics Unit, National Institute of Public Health, 100 00 Prague, Czech Republic; [email protected] (P.H.); [email protected] (P.S.) 2 Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 306 05 Pilsen, Czech Republic 3 Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 100 00 Prague, Czech Republic * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +420-267082681; Fax: +420-267311236 Received: 31 July 2020; Accepted: 26 August 2020; Published: 28 August 2020 Abstract: Pharmacogenomics is an evolving tool of precision medicine. Recently,due to the introduction of next-generation sequencing and projects generating “Big Data”, a plethora of new genetic variants in pharmacogenes have been discovered. Cancer resistance is a major complication often preventing successful anticancer treatments. Pharmacogenomics of both somatic mutations in tumor cells and germline variants may help optimize targeted treatments and improve the response to conventional oncological therapy. In addition, integrative approaches combining copy number variations and long noncoding RNA profiling with germline and somatic variations seem to be a promising approach as well. In pharmacology, expression and enzyme activity are traditionally the more studied aspects of ATP-binding cassette transporters and cytochromes P450. In this review, we briefly introduce the field of pharmacogenomics and the advancements driven by next-generation sequencing and outline the possible roles of genetic variation in the two large pharmacogene superfamilies.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacogenomics: the Promise of Personalized Medicine for CNS Disorders
    Neuropsychopharmacology REVIEWS (2009) 34, 159–172 & 2009 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0893-133X/09 $30.00 REVIEW ............................................................................................................................................................... www.neuropsychopharmacology.org 159 Pharmacogenomics: The Promise of Personalized Medicine for CNS Disorders Jose de Leon*,1,2,3,4 1 2 Mental Health Research Center, Eastern State Hospital, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA; College of Medicine, 3 4 University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA; College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA; Psychiatry and Neurosciences Research Group (CTS-549), Institute of Neurosciences, Medical School, University of Granada, Granada, Spain This review focuses first on the concept of pharmacogenomics and its related concepts (biomarkers and personalized prescription). Next, the first generation of five DNA pharmacogenomic tests used in the clinical practice of psychiatry is briefly reviewed. Then the possible involvement of these pharmacogenomic tests in the exploration of early clinical proof of mechanism is described by using two of the tests and one example from the pharmaceutical industry (iloperidone clinical trials). The initial attempts to use other microarray tests (measuring RNA expression) as peripheral biomarkers for CNS disorders are briefly described. Then the challenge of taking pharmacogenomic tests (compared to drugs) into clinical practice is explained by focusing on regulatory
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacogenomic Testing for Selected Conditions Final Evidence Report
    Pharmacogenomic testing for selected conditions Final evidence report December 9, 2016 Health Technology Assessment Program (HTA) Washington State Health Care Authority PO Box 42712 Olympia, WA 98504-2712 (360) 725-5126 www.hca.wa.gov/about-hca/health-technology-assessment [email protected] Pharmacogenomic Testing for Selected Conditions A Health Technology Assessment Prepared for Washington State Healthcare Authority FINAL REPORT December 9, 2016 Acknowledgement This report was prepared by: Hayes, Inc. 157 S. Broad Street Suite 200 Lansdale, PA 19446 P: 215.855.0615 F: 215.855.5218 This report is intended to provide research assistance and general information only. It is not intended to be used as the sole basis for determining coverage policy or defining treatment protocols or medical modalities, nor should it be construed as providing medical advice regarding treatment of an individual’s specific case. Any decision regarding claims eligibility or benefits, or acquisition or use of a health technology is solely within the discretion of your organization. Hayes, Inc. assumes no responsibility or liability for such decisions. Hayes employees and contractors do not have material, professional, familial, or financial affiliations that create actual or potential conflicts of interest related to the preparation of this report. WA – Health Technology Assessment December 9, 2016 Table of Contents EVIDENCE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE ROLE of PHARMACOGENOMICS in PHARMACOKINETICS Cheryl D
    CHAPTER 5 THE ROLE OF PHARMACOGENOMICS IN PHARMACOKINETICS Cheryl D. Cropp INTRODUCTION Recent advances in personalized medicine have demonstrated that genetic variations in genes encoding for drug metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) and drug membrane transporters (DMTs) can have an important impact on drug disposition and efficacy. These variations are integral to the explanation of differences in drug disposition between and within populations. This chapter provides a general review of the role of pharmacogenomics and its established importance in the safe and effective dosing of medications. BASIC DEFINITIONS Highlighted fields of study related to drug disposition and therapeutic outcomes include: • Pharmacodynamics: What the drug does to the body. It is the science of how the drug and drug- target interact and result in a biological effect. • Pharmacogenetics: The study of genetic causes of individual DNA variations in drug response. • Pharmacogenomics: A genome-wide analysis (DNA, RNA level) of the genetic determinants of drug efficacy and toxicity. • Pharmacokinetics: What the body does to the drug. Pharmacokinetics relates to how drug concentrations of a medication change over a dosing interval. It involves the dynamics of how the drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and eliminated (ADME) by the body. • Pharmacology: An investigation of the drug action’s impact on biological systems including an understanding of chemical properties, mechanism of action, therapeutic response, and biological transformation. Overall, the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenetics, and pharmacogenomics related to a drug interact biologically to influence efficacy and/or toxicity and serve as a framework for improving the understanding of pharmacology and drug development in the creation of more advanced and novel approaches to treat disease and provide precision therapies for individual patients (see Figure 5-1).
    [Show full text]
  • Premarket Evaluation in Early-Phase Clinical Studies and Recommendations for Labeling
    Guidance for Industry Clinical Pharmacogenomics: Premarket Evaluation in Early-Phase Clinical Studies and Recommendations for Labeling U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) January 2013 Clinical Pharmacology Clinical/Medical 10300.fnl.doc Guidance for Industry Clinical Pharmacogenomics: Premarket Evaluation in Early-Phase Clinical Studies and Recommendations for Labeling Additional copies are available from: Office of Communications Division of Drug Information, WO51, Room 2201 10903 New Hampshire Ave. Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002 Phone: 301-796-3400; Fax 301-847-8714 http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or Office of Communication, Outreach, and Development (HFM-40) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Food and Drug Administration 1401 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852-1448 http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm (Tel) 800-835-4709 or 301-827-1800 or Office of Communication, Education, and Radiation Programs Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance Center for Devices and Radiological Health Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Ave. WO66, Room 4613 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002 http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/default.htm Email: [email protected] Fax: 301-827-8149 (Tel) Manufacturers Assistance: 800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100 (Tel) International Staff: 301-796-5708 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) January 2013 Clinical Pharmacology Clinical/Medical TABLE OF CONTENTS I.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacogenomics for Infectious Diseases
    Microbio al lo ic g d y e & M D f i o a l g Journal of a n n o Aceti, J Med Microb Diagn 2016, 5:1 r s u i s o J DOI: 10.4172/2161-0703.1000223 ISSN: 2161-0703 Medical Microbiology & Diagnosis Brief Communication Open Access Pharmacogenomics for Infectious Diseases Antonio Aceti* Department of Infectious Diseases, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy *Corresponding author: Antonio Aceti, Professor, Department of Infectious Diseases, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy, Tel: 0633775817; E-mail: [email protected] Rec date: Jan 28, 2016; Acc date: Mar 18, 2016; Pub date: Mar 21, 2016 Copyright: © 2016 Aceti A, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Communication analysis varying according to the species being analysed, would offer the benefit of streamlining the multiple parallel phenotypic assays The microbiological investigations typically undertaken as part of currently undertaken to test for susceptibility to a wide range of the management of infectious disease in both individuals and antibiotics. Arguably, genomics could provide more accurate results populations can be broadly characterised as addressing at least one of than phenotypic assays that are subject to significant intrinsic variation the following questions: caused by the large number of external factors that can affect bacterial • What organism is causing the infection? growth, and the intrinsic biological variation in the organisms themselves. Over the past decade, several companies have developed • What drugs can be used to treat it? various nucleic acid testing assays for the direct detection of viral • How is it related to other similar infections? pathogens and some resistant bacteria from clinical samples [4].
    [Show full text]
  • PHARMACOGENOMICS Know Your GPCR Mutations (And Target Them Right)
    RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS Nature Reviews Drug Discovery | Published online 1 Feb 2018; doi:10.1038/nrd.2018.13 mangsaab/iStock/Getty Images Plus PHARMACOGENOMICS Know your GPCR mutations (and target them right) Natural human genetic variations may within known functional sites, such MOR. Given the huge number of cause patients to respond differently as ligand binding, effector binding or drugs targeting the MOR that are to the same medication. Therefore, post-translational modification sites. prescribed, if even a small fraction understanding genetic variation in To explore the functional are ineffective or cause adverse drug targets can maximize efficacy implications of such mutations, the reactions, the economic burden and reduce side effects. In a new study, authors then experimentally analysed may be considerable. a team led by M. Madan Babu the impact of three MVs near the However, “as it stands, no receptor present a comprehensive analysis of ligand-binding pocket of the μ-opioid variants are included in the labelling G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) receptor (MOR) on G protein activa- information of any GPCR drug genetic variants and find that GPCRs tion by the endogenous agonist endo- target by any regulatory agency,” says targeted by marketed drugs show morphine 1, morphine (full agonist), Alexander Hauser, first author of this genetic variation within functional buprenorphine (partial agonist) and study. “This is likely going to change regions such as drug-binding sites. naloxone (antagonist). Whereas one with increased sequencing efforts, GPCRs mediate the therapeutic variant (M153V) resulted in partial bigger cohorts and better character- effects of more than 30% of FDA- LoF and reduced the response to both ization of the variants”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Population Genetics of Drug Resistance Evolution in Natural Populations of Viral, Bacterial and Eukaryotic Pathogens
    Molecular Ecology (2016) 25, 42–66 doi: 10.1111/mec.13474 DETECTING SELECTION IN NATURAL POPULATIONS: MAKING SENSE OF GENOME SCANS AND TOWARDS ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS The population genetics of drug resistance evolution in natural populations of viral, bacterial and eukaryotic pathogens BENJAMIN A. WILSON,*1 NANDITA R. GARUD,† 1 ALISON F. FEDER,*1 ZOE J. ASSAF† 1 and PLEUNI S. PENNINGS‡ *Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA, †Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA, ‡Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, Room 520, Hensill Hall, 1600 Holloway Ave, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA Abstract Drug resistance is a costly consequence of pathogen evolution and a major concern in public health. In this review, we show how population genetics can be used to study the evolution of drug resistance and also how drug resistance evolution is informative as an evolutionary model system. We highlight five examples from diverse organisms with particular focus on: (i) identifying drug resistance loci in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum using the genomic signatures of selective sweeps, (ii) deter- mining the role of epistasis in drug resistance evolution in influenza, (iii) quantifying the role of standing genetic variation in the evolution of drug resistance in HIV, (iv) using drug resistance mutations to study clonal interference dynamics in tuberculosis and (v) analysing the population structure of the core and accessory genome of Staphy- lococcus aureus to understand the spread of methicillin resistance. Throughout this review, we discuss the uses of sequence data and population genetic theory in studying the evolution of drug resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacogenomics of Antibiotics
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Pharmacogenomics of Antibiotics Gabriele Stocco 1 , Marianna Lucafò 2 and Giuliana Decorti 2,3,* 1 Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, I-34128 Trieste, Italy; [email protected] 2 Institute for Maternal and Child Health—IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, I-34137 Trieste, Italy; [email protected] 3 Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, I-34149 Trieste, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 28 July 2020; Accepted: 17 August 2020; Published: 19 August 2020 Abstract: Although the introduction of antibiotics in medicine has resulted in one of the most successful events and in a major breakthrough to reduce morbidity and mortality caused by infectious disease, response to these agents is not always predictable, leading to differences in their efficacy, and sometimes to the occurrence of adverse effects. Genetic variability, resulting in differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antibiotics, is often involved in the variable response, of particular importance are polymorphisms in genes encoding for drug metabolizing enzymes and membrane transporters. In addition, variations in the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and class II genes have been associated with different immune mediated reactions induced by antibiotics. In recent years, the importance of pharmacogenetics in the personalization of therapies has been recognized in various clinical fields, although not clearly in the context of antibiotic therapy. In this review, we make an overview of antibiotic pharmacogenomics and of its potential role in optimizing drug therapy and reducing adverse reactions. Keywords: pharmacogenomics; antibiotics; human leukocyte antigen (HLA); adverse drug reaction; transporters; pharmacokinetics 1.
    [Show full text]