Double Jeopardy Constitutional Interpretation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Double Jeopardy Constitutional Interpretation Journal of the Bar of Ireland • Volume 13 • Issue 5 • November 2008 Double Jeopardy Constitutional Interpretation BR 5-2008.indd 1 28/10/2008 10:46:07 Editorial Correspondence to: Eilis Brennan BL The Editor Bar Review Law Library Four Courts Dublin 7 DX 813154 Telephone: 353-1-817 5505 Fax: 353-1-872 0455 E: [email protected] Cover Illustration: Brian Gallagher T: 01 4973389 Editor: Eilis Brennan BL E: [email protected] W: www.bdgart.com Typeset by Gough Typesetting Services, Dublin [email protected] T: 01 8727305 Editorial Board: Donal O’Donnell SC, Chairman, Editorial Board Gerry Durcan SC Mary O’Toole SC Patrick Dillon Malone BL Conor Dignam BL Volume 13, Issue 5, November 2008, ISSN 1339-3426 Adele Murphy BL Brian Kennedy BL Vincent Browne BL Mark O’Connell BL Paul A. McDermott BL Tom O’Malley BL Contents Patrick Leonard BL Paul McCarthy BL Des Mulhere Jeanne McDonagh 106 Character Evidence in criminal trials Jerry Carroll THERESA LOWE BL Consultant Editors: Dermot Gleeson SC Patrick MacEntee SC 109 The Incoherence of Historicism in Irish Constitutional Thomas McCann SC Interpretation* Eoghan Fitzsimons SC Pat Hanratty SC DAVID LANGWALLNER BL James O’Reilly SC Gerard Hogan SC lxxiii Legal Update: A Guide to Legal Developments from The Bar Review is published by Round Hall in association with The 24th June 2008 up to 14th October 2008 Bar Council of Ireland. For all subscription queries contact: 115 Reform of the Statute Book and Access to Legislation Round Hall Thomson Reuters HEATHER MAHON 43 Fitzwilliam Place, Dublin 2 Telephone: + 353 1 662 5301 Fax: + 353 1 662 5302 119 Double Jeopardy – How many trials to Babylon? E: [email protected] DAVID GOLDBERG SC web: www.roundhall.ie Subscriptions: January 2008 to December 2008—6 issues Annual Subscription: €210.00 For all advertising queries contact: Tom Clark, Direct line: + 44 20 7393 7797 E: [email protected] Directories Unit. Sweet & Maxwell Contributions published in this journal are not intended to, and do not represent, legal advice on Telephone: + 44 20 7393 7000 the subject matter contained herein. This publication should not be used as a substitute for or as a supplement to, legal advice. The views expressed in the articles herein are the views of the contributing The Bar Review November 2008 authors and do not represent the views or opinions of the Bar Review or the Bar Council. BR 5-2008.indd 105 28/10/2008 10:46:08 Character Evidence in criminal trials THERESA LOWE BL It is a very common feature of a plea in mitigation that the it is well established that the defence can put before the jury defence will call character witnesses who will testify as to the evidence of good character. good character of the accused. What is not so common is the calling of character witnesses during the course of a criminal Purpose of calling character evidence trial prior to the case going to the jury. While uncommon, the defence is at all times entitled to adduce this evidence The purpose of calling character witnesses to give evidence and in certain circumstances, it is the appropriate course for during the trial is primarily to show that the accused is less the defence to take. likely to have committed the offence because he or she is a person of good character. Such evidence goes to his or her History innocence of the offences charged and also to his or her credibility. This evidence is generally led by the defence and The admission of evidence of the good character of an put before the jury for the dual purpose of convincing them accused can be traced back to the seventeenth century in the that the accused is unlikely to have committed the offences case of R v Turner1. It was regularly admitted by the end of alleged and further to bolster the credibility of the accused if the eighteenth century and in the leading case of R v Rowton2 he or she gives evidence or made pre-trial statements denying Cockburn C.J. stated: the commission of the offence.4 Thus, where evidence of good character is given on behalf “The allowing evidence of a prisoner’s good character of an accused, it goes to his or her innocence of the offences to be given has grown up from a desire to administer charged and his or her credibility, if he testified during the the law with mercy, as far as possible. It sprung up in proceedings or made exculpatory pre-trial statements. a time when the law was, according to the common In People (Attorney General) v Bond,5 the trial judge had estimation of mankind, severer than it should have permitted the cross-examination of the accused as to been.” previous convictions on the basis that the defence had attacked the character of prosecution witnesses. Haugh J. While the law may be regarded as less severe in the 21st explained that this evidence was admissible only to show century, such evidence is now admissible in favour of the that the accused was a person whose evidence might not be accused in any criminal proceedings and can be adduced by worthy of credit. It had, however, wrongly been used to show examination in chief of the accused or witnesses called by that the accused had probably committed the offences with the defence, or elicited on cross examination of prosecution which he was charged. The trial judge should have explained witnesses, a co-accused or witnesses called by him.3 that “it went to his credit and should on no account be used to show the Thus, the defence is entitled to elicit that evidence from probability of his guilt.” 6 the prosecuting Garda and prosecution witnesses, from an accused person during examination-in-chief, from the Who can be called as a character witness? co-accused or witnesses called by him and there is also an entitlement to call character witnesses if the defence chooses • Persons who are aware of the accused person’s to do so. standing in the community.7 Typical character The Criminal Justice (Evidence) Act of 1924 anticipates witnesses are previous or current employers, a the defence giving evidence of good character. Section spouse can be called to give character evidence8 1(f)(ii) provides that the accused may be asked about his bad and in general, persons of good standing in the character and/or about any previous offences which he may community. have committed, or been convicted of, or been charged with, if he has personally or by his advocate asked questions of the witnesses for the prosecution with a view to establishing his own good character or has given evidence of his good character, or the nature or conduct of the defence is such as to involve imputations on the character of the prosecutor or the witnesses for the prosecution. That legislation is in place for over eighty years. Therefore, 4 McGrath, Evidence. (2005) 466 5 [1966] I.R. 214 6 ( 223) 7 R. v. Rowton (1865) 10 Cox C.C. 25 at 30; [1861-73] All E.R. 549 at 1 (1664) 6 St. Tr. 565. 552.) 2 (1865) 10 Cox C.C. 25 at 30; [1861-73] All E.R. 549 at 552. 8 Peter Charleton, P.A. McDermott, M. Bolger, Criminal Law (1999) 3 McGrath, Evidence. (2005) 465 189 Page 106 Bar Review November 2008 BR 5-2008.indd 106 28/10/2008 10:46:08 What kind of good character evidence may be members of the community think of him or given? her, when he or she is not present.17 Therefore an accused, when giving evidence of his own • When evidence of good character is given, it good character, may give evidence of specific should be directed to that part of the man’s acts or instances tending to show that he is of character which is relevant.9 So, if the charge good character.18 is theft, evidence of the accused person’s character for honesty is relevant as is his Nature of the questions character for violence where the charge is one of assault. The witness is asked a series of questions designed to • The rule at common law is that evidence of elicit relevant information about the accused. The form of character is confined to evidence of general questioning is limited in these circumstances. There are certain reputation and not evidence of disposition. matters that cannot be canvassed by Defence Counsel. Since the decision in Rowton, it has been the Examples of inappropriate questions might be, by way of rule that witnesses as to character must testify example, an attempt to elicit the witness’s immediate reaction to the reputation of the accused and not to on hearing about the particular charge or charges. It would specific good acts or individual’s opinions as to also be imprudent to ask a witness if they believe the accused character. That approach was approved in this to be capable of committing the alleged offence. jurisdiction in People (DPP) v Ferris 10 Therefore, the only evidence of good character that may be adduced by a witness called by the defence Judges Directions or elicited in cross-examination is evidence of the general reputation of the accused and not There are no authorities here regarding Judges directions in evidence of disposition.11 relation to character evidence. However, other jurisdictions • While evidence of (a) opinion or (b) particular can provide some guidance in this area. In Commonwealth acts or examples of conduct should be excluded, jurisdictions, the trial judge is required to give the jury a 12 in practice, the rule is ignored13 and such direction as to the use that can be made and the weight to evidence is often admitted.
Recommended publications
  • Passport Delays and EU Law Legal Privilege
    Journal of the Bar of Ireland • Volume 15 • Issue 4 • July 2010 Passport Delays and EU Law Legal Privilege FAMILY Mediation Training & Professional Accreditation Programmes 2010 ENNIS: Tues 14th to Sat 18th September 2010 CHARLEVILLE: Tues 2nd to Sat 6th November 2010 Fees: €4,250.00 REDUCED TO €2,850.00 ► Friarylaw’s Family Mediation Training & Professional Accreditation Programme is specifically designed for the resolution of Domestic Relations and Matrimonial disputes. It is a five day programme which also contains the initial half day mini review available to Civil & Commercial candidates, followed by four and a half days of practical family mediation training provided by experienced family mediators and trainers, lawyer and non-lawyer. It also concludes with a final day video recorded simulated mediation, together with a further 12-16 hours post course independent study. ► For Civil & Commercial Accredited Mediators who wish to now obtain the Family Mediation Accreditation, special provisions are in place to attend on the programme for three days at the cost of €1,650. ► Friarylaw are one of the leading mediation service providers in Ireland. In February 2010 we launched a Family Mediation Training Programme in conjunction with Family Mediation Ireland. This training is unique to the Irish market and is based upon the successful methodology adopted by Family Mediation Ireland in the conduct of mediations during the past twelve months. It involves co-mediation and applies an approach to family mediation of both plenary session and private caucusing. An important characteristic of the training is the guarantee of pupilage opportunities by Family Mediation Ireland to Friarylaw panelist graduates of the programme.
    [Show full text]
  • 13Th Annual Report, 2008
    BRITISH-IRISH PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY TIONÓL PARLAIMINTEACH NA BREATAINE AGUS NA HÉIREANN Doc No 142 March 2009 1 CONTENTS Introduction…………………………………………………………………………… Membership of the Body……………………………………………………………… Political developments……………………………………………………………… The work of the Body………………………………………………………………… Thirty-sixth Plenary ……………………………………………………………… Thirty-seventh Plenary……………………………………………………………… Steering Committee………………………………………………………………… Committees…………………………………………………………………………… Staffing………………………………………………………………………………… Prospects for 2009…………………………………………………………………… APPENDIX 1: Membership of the Body…………………………………… APPENDIX 2: Reports and other documents approved by the Body……… APPENDIX 3: Work of Committees……………………………………… Committee A…………………………………………………………… Committee B…………………………………………………………… Committee C…………………………………………………………… Committee D…………………………………………………………… APPENDIX 4: Staff of the Body…………………………………………… 2 THIRTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT THE WORK OF THE BRITISH-IRISH INTER-PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY Introduction 1.This is the thirteenth annual report of the Body since it was decided at the Plenary Session in May 1996 that such a Report should be made. This Report summarises the work of the Body during 2008. Membership of the Body 2.There were a number of significant changes in membership during the year. In the eary spring, the British Co-Chair, the Rt Hon Paul Murphy, returned to the Cabinet and was replaced by the Rt Hon Peter Hain. Sean O’Fearghail was replaced as an Irish Vice- Chair and Chair of Committee C by Ms Margaret Conlon. Most importantly for the future of the Body, the October session was attended for the first time by delegates from the Democratic unionist Party and the Ulster Unionist party. Political Developments General Overview 3. 2008 was a year of consolidation for the peace process in Northern Ireland following the restoration of devolved government in May 2007. A Programme for Government and Investment Strategy for Northern Ireland, along with the Budget, were passed by the Assembly on 28 and 29 January 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the 30 Dáil for Anti-Poverty Groups
    European Anti-Poverty Network (EAPN) Ireland Guide to the 30th Dáil for Anti-Poverty Groups ‘EAPN Ireland is a network of groups and individuals working against poverty and social exclusion. Our objective is to put the fight against poverty at the top of the European and Irish agendas’ Contents Page Acknowledgements 2 Introduction 2 The Parties 4 Dáil Session Guide 5 A Brief Guide to Legislation 7 Dáil Committees 9 The TD in the Dáil 9 Contacting a TD 12 APPENDICES 1: List of Committees and Spokespersons 2: Government Ministers and Party Spokespersons 1 Introduction This Guide has been produced by the European Anti-Poverty Network (EAPN) Ireland. It is intended as a short briefing on the functioning of the Dáil and a simple explanation of specific areas that may be of interest to people operating in the community/NGO sector in attempting to make the best use of the Dáil. This briefing document is produced as a result of the EAPN Focus on Poverty in Ireland project, which started in December 2006. This project aimed to raise awareness of poverty and put poverty reduction at the top of the political agenda, while also promoting understanding and involvement in the social inclusion process among people experiencing poverty. This Guide is intended as an accompanying document to the EAPN Guide to Understanding and Engaging with the European Union. The overall aim in producing these two guides is to inform people working in the community and voluntary sector of how to engage with the Irish Parliament and the European Union in influencing policy and voicing their concerns about poverty and social inclusion issues.
    [Show full text]
  • 71 Seanad E´ Ireann 1227
    71 SEANAD E´ IREANN 1227 De´ardaoin, 8 Deireadh Fo´mhair, 2009 Thursday, 8th October, 2009 10.30 a.m. RIAR NA hOIBRE Order Paper GNO´ POIBLI´ Public Business 1. (l) An Bille um Riala´il Iompair Phoiblı´ 2009 — An Coiste (ato´ga´il, alt 28). (a) Public Transport Regulation Bill 2009 — Committee (resumed, section 28). 2. An Bille um Pleana´il agus Forbairt (Leasu´ ) 2009 — An Dara Ce´im (ato´ga´il). Planning and Development (Amendment) Bill 2009 — Second Stage (resumed). 3. An Bille um Fhorbairtı´ Ilaonad 2009 — An Coiste. Multi-Unit Developments Bill 2009 — Committee. 4. An Bille um No´ s Imeachta Coiriu´ il 2009 — An Coiste. Criminal Procedure Bill 2009 — Committee. 5. An Bille Cro´ ine´irı´ 2007 — An Coiste. Coroners Bill 2007 — Committee. 6. An Bille um Sheirbhı´sı´ Maoine (Riala´il) 2009 — An Coiste. Property Services (Regulation) Bill 2009 — Committee. 7. Bille na dTeangacha Oifigiu´ la (Leasu´ ) 2005 — An Dara Ce´im. Official Languages (Amendment) Bill 2005 — Second Stage. —Senators Joe O’Toole, Paul Coghlan, David Norris. 8. An Bille um Chosaint Coigiltis Comhair Creidmheasa 2008 — An Dara Ce´im. Credit Union Savings Protection Bill 2008 — Second Stage. —Senators Joe O’Toole, David Norris, Feargal Quinn, Shane Ross, Ivana Bacik, Ro´na´n Mullen. 9. An Bille um Chumas Meabhrach agus Caomhno´ ireacht 2008 — An Dara Ce´im. Mental Capacity and Guardianship Bill 2008 — Second Stage. —Senators Joe O’Toole, David Norris, Feargal Quinn, Shane Ross, Ivana Bacik. P.T.O. 1228 8 Deireadh Fo´mhair, 2009 10. An Bille um Chosaint Tomhalto´ irı´ (Leasu´ ) 2008 — An Dara Ce´im.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Seanad Éireann 93
    6 SEANAD ÉIREANN 93 Dé Máirt, 25 Eanáir, 2011 Tuesday, 25th January, 2011 2.30 p.m. RIAR NA hOIBRE Order Paper GNÓ POIBLÍ Public Business 1. (l) An Bille um Thacaíocht do Mhic Léinn, 2008 [Dáil] — An Coiste. (a) Student Support Bill 2008 [Dáil] — Committee. 2. An Bille um Leas Cúnna, 2010 — An Coiste. Welfare of Greyhounds Bill 2010 — Committee. 3. Ráitis maidir leis an séadchomhartha náisiúnta ag 14-16 Sráid Uí Mhóra, Baile Átha Cliath 1. Statements on the national monument at 14-16 Moore Street, Dublin 1. 4. An Bille um Cheartas Coiriúil (Ord Poiblí), 2010 [Dáil] — An Dara Céim. Criminal Justice (Public Order) Bill 2010 [Dáil] — Second Stage. 5. An Bille um Fhreagairt don Athrú Aeráide, 2010 — An Dara Céim (atógáil). Climate Change Response Bill 2010 — Second Stage (resumed). Leasú ar an Tairiscint don Dara Léamh: Amendment to Motion for Second Stage: 1. To delete all words after ‘‘That’’ and substitute the following: ‘‘Seanad Éireann declines to give a Second Reading to the Climate Change Response Bill 2010 because an all Party consensus has not been agreed on a green house gas emission reduction strategy.’’ —Senators Frances Fitzgerald, Paul Bradford, Paddy Burke, Jerry Buttimer, Ciaran Cannon, Paudie Coffey, Paul Coghlan, Maurice Cummins, Paschal Donohoe, Fidelma Healy-Eames, Nicky McFadden, Joe O’Reilly, John Paul Phelan, Eugene Regan, Liam Twomey. 6. An Bille Ombudsman (Leasú), 2008 [Dáil] — An Dara Céim. Ombudsman (Amendment) Bill 2008 [Dáil] — Second Stage. 7. An Bille Cróinéirí, 2007 — An Coiste. Coroners Bill 2007 — Committee. P.T.O. 94 25 Eanáir, 2011 8. An Bille um Chonarthaí Foirgníochta, 2010 — An Coiste.
    [Show full text]
  • Seanad Éireann
    SEANAD ÉIREANN AN BILLE UM CHLÚMHILLEADH 2006 DEFAMATION BILL 2006 LEASUITHE TUARASCÁLA REPORT AMENDMENTS [No. 43a of 2006] [11 March, 2008] [Printers Reference] SEANAD ÉIREANN AN BILLE UM CHLÚMHILLEADH 2006 —AN TUARASCÁIL DEFAMATION BILL 2006 —REPORT Leasuithe Amendments *Government amendments are distinguished by an asterisk. 1. In page 7, lines 1 and 2, to delete all words from and including “except” in line 1 down to and including “implication)” in line 2. —Senators Eugene Regan, Maurice Cummins. 2. In page 7, line 24, after “person” to insert the following: “or the publication to the second-mentioned person was in the course of the performance of duties of a secretarial nature by the second-mentioned person (being a person whose relationship if any to the first-mentioned person is primarily based on contract) and there were no reasonable grounds to believe that the first-mentioned person would suffer any significant injury by reason only of such publication”. —Senators Alex White, Michael McCarthy, Brendan Ryan, Phil Prendergast, Dominic Hannigan, Alan Kelly. 3. In page 9, to delete lines 43 and 44. —Senators Eugene Regan, Maurice Cummins. 4. In page 10, line 10, to delete “, in particular,”. —Senators Alex White, Michael McCarthy, Brendan Ryan, Phil Prendergast, Dominic Hannigan, Alan Kelly. 5. In page 10, to delete lines 17 to 20 and substitute the following: “(3) In this section “multiple publication” means publication by a person of the same defamatory statement in two or more of his or her media publications whether contemporaneously or not.”. —Senators Eugene Regan, Maurice Cummins. 6. In page 10, to delete lines 21 to 25 —Senators David Norris, Eugene Regan.
    [Show full text]
  • 13 Seanad E´ Ireann 163
    13 SEANAD E´ IREANN 163 De´ Ce´adaoin, 18 Feabhra, 2009 Wednesday, 18th February, 2009 10.30 a.m. RIAR NA hOIBRE Order Paper GNO´ POIBLI´ Public Business 1. An Bille fa´n Ombudsman um Sheirbhı´sı´ Dlı´ 2008 [Da´il] — An Dara Ce´im. Legal Services Ombudsman Bill 2008 [Da´il] — Second Stage. 2. (l) An Bille Toghcha´in (Leasu´ ) 2008 [Da´il] — An Coiste (Alt 4, ato´ga´il). (a) Electoral (Amendment) Bill 2008 [Da´il] — Committee (Section 4, resumed). 3. Ra´itis maidir leis an Mea´n-Oirthear. Statements on the Middle East. 4. (l) An Bille Cuanta (Leasu´ ) 2008 — An Coiste (leasu´ 8, ato´ga´il). (a) Harbours (Amendment) Bill 2008 — Committee (amendment 8, resumed). 5. An Bille Cro´ ine´irı´ 2007 — An Coiste. Coroners Bill 2007 — Committee. 6. An Bille Uchta´la 2009 — An Coiste. Adoption Bill 2009 — Committee. 7. Bille na dTeangacha Oifigiu´ la (Leasu´ ) 2005 — An Dara Ce´im. Official Languages (Amendment) Bill 2005 — Second Stage. —Senators Joe O’Toole, Paul Coghlan, David Norris. 8. An Bille um Chosaint Coigiltis Comhair Creidmheasa 2008 — An Dara Ce´im. Credit Union Savings Protection Bill 2008 — Second Stage. —Senators Joe O’Toole, David Norris, Feargal Quinn, Shane Ross, Ivana Bacik, Ro´na´n Mullen. 9. An Bille um Chumas Meabhrach agus Caomhno´ ireacht 2008 — An Dara Ce´im. Mental Capacity and Guardianship Bill 2008 — Second Stage. —Senators Joe O’Toole, David Norris, Feargal Quinn, Shane Ross, Ivana Bacik. P.T.O. 164 18 Feabhra, 2009 10. An Bille um Chosaint Tomhalto´ irı´ (Leasu´ ) 2008 — An Dara Ce´im.
    [Show full text]
  • 16Th Annual Report, 2011
    BRITISH-IRISH PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY TIONÓL PARLAIMINTEACH NA BREATAINE AGUS NA HÉIREANN SIXTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT Doc. No. 190 May 2012 1 CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………………………Page 3 Membership of the Body……………………………………………………………….Page 3. Political developments…………………………………………………………………Page 3 The work of the Assembly…………………………………………………………….Page 6 Forty-second plenary session …………………………………………………….Page 6 Forty-third plenary session…………………………………………………………Page 10 Committees…………………………………………………………………………..Page 15 Staffing……………………………………………………………………………….Page 15 Prospects for 2012…………………………………………………………………Page 16 APPENDIX 1: Membership of the Body……………………………… Page 17 APPENDIX 2: Reports and other documents approved by the Body….Page 22 APPENDIX 3: Work of Committees…………………………………..Page 23 Committee A…………………………………………………………… Committee B…………………………………………………………… Committee C…………………………………………………………… Committee D…………………………………………………………… APPENDIX 4: Staffing of the Assembly…………………………………,,Page 27 2 SIXTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT THE WORK OF THE BRITISH-IRISH PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY Introduction 1. This is the sixteenth annual report of the Assembly since it was decided at the Plenary Session in May 1996 that such a Report should be made. This Report summarises the work of the Assembly during 2011. Membership of the Assembly 2. Following the Irish General Election of 25 February 2011, a new Irish delegation was appointed. Mr Niall Blaney TD, who ceased to be a member of the Assembly, was replaced as Co-Chair by Mr Joe McHugh TD. Elections to the Scottish Parliament, National Assembly for Wales and Northern Ireland Assembly in May 2011 also led to significant changes in delegations. Political developments General Overview 3. The first British State Visit to Ireland took place from 17-20 May 2011. Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and HRH the Duke of Edinburgh met the President Mrs Mary McAleese and Dr McAleese, as well as the Taoiseach, Mr Enda Kenny TD.
    [Show full text]
  • Thirteenth Annual Report
    BRITISH-IRISH PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY TIONÓL PARLAIMINTEACH NA BREATAINE AGUS NA HÉIREANN Doc No February 2010 1 CONTENTS Introduction…………………………………………………………………………… Membership of the Body……………………………………………………………… Political developments……………………………………………………………… The work of the Body………………………………………………………………… Thirty-sixth Plenary ……………………………………………………………… Thirty-seventh Plenary……………………………………………………………… Steering Committee………………………………………………………………… Committees…………………………………………………………………………… Staffing………………………………………………………………………………… Prospects for 2009…………………………………………………………………… APPENDIX 1: Membership of the Body…………………………………… APPENDIX 2: Reports and other documents approved by the Body……… APPENDIX 3: Work of Committees……………………………………… Committee A…………………………………………………………… Committee B…………………………………………………………… Committee C…………………………………………………………… Committee D…………………………………………………………… 2 APPENDIX 4: Staff of the Body…………………………………………… 3 FOURTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT THE WORK OF THE BRITISH-IRISH INTER-PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY Introduction 1.This is the fourteenth annual report of the Assembly since it was decided at the Plenary Session in May 1996 that such a Report should be made. This Report summarises the work of the Assembly during 2008. Membership of the Body 2.There were a number of significant changes in membership during the year. In the eary spring, the British Co-Chair, the Rt Hon Paul Murphy, returned to the Cabinet and was replaced by the Rt Hon Peter Hain. Sean O‟Fearghail was replaced as an Irish Vice- Chair and Chair of Committee C by Ms Margaret Conlon. Most importantly for the future of the Body, the October session was attended for the first time by delegates from the Democratic unionist Party and the Ulster Unionist party. Political Developments General Overview 3. 2008 was a year of consolidation for the peace process in Northern Ireland following the restoration of devolved government in May 2007. A Programme for Government and Investment Strategy for Northern Ireland, along with the Budget, were passed by the Assembly on 28 and 29 January 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Chairperson and Eight Commissioners of Low Pay Commission Appointed Oireachtas Update €300 Housing Investment Programme Jointl
    PUBLIC AFFAIRS IRELAND NEWSLETTER ISSUE 348 FEBRUARY 23 2015 YOUR ESSENTIAL WEEKLY GUIDE TO LEGISLATIVE, REGULATORY, AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS IN IRELAND Oireachtas Update In the Dáil, the Order for Second Stage and Second Stage of the Children and Family Relationships Bill 2015 will be on the agenda on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday. The Roads Bill 2015 will be reaching its Final Stage on Wednesday and Thursday. The Redress for Women Resident in Certain Institutions Bill 2014, the Workplace Relations Bill 2014, and the Garda Siochána (Amendment) (No. 3) Bill 2014, are all on the Seanad’s timetable this week. Minister of State Ann Phelan will be presenting on Tuesday to the Joint Committee on Environment, Culture and the Gaeltacht about the challenges that exist for rural Ireland. The Joint Committee on Transport and Communications will hear from Energia, SSE Airtricity, Electric Ireland and Bord Gáis Energy representatives on Wednesday on the topic of the cost of electricity and gas to consumers in the context of falling international wholesale crude oil and gas prices. Chairperson and Eight Commissioners of Low Pay Commission appointed Minister for Business and Employment, Ged Nash TD, has appointed Dr Donal de Buitléir as Chairperson of the Low Pay Commission. Dr de Buitléir is Director of Publicpolicy.ie. The Low Pay Commission will advise the Government on an annual basis on an appropriate National Minimum Wage rate. Eight members to serve on the Commission were also appointed by the Minister following a competition advertised by the Public Appointments Service. The current national minimum wage in Ireland is €8.65.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtual Child Pornography Mental Health Tribunals
    Journal of the Bar of Ireland • Volume 14 • Issue 1 • February 2009 Virtual Child Pornography Mental Health Tribunals BR 1-2009.indd 1 09/02/2009 12:12:50 Editorial Correspondence to: Eilis Brennan BL The Editor Bar Review Law Library Four Courts Dublin 7 DX 813154 Telephone: 353-1-817 5505 Fax: 353-1-872 0455 E: [email protected] Editor: Eilis Brennan BL Editorial Board: Cover Illustration: Brian Gallagher T: 01 4973389 Donal O’Donnell SC, E: [email protected] W: www.bdgart.com Chairman, Editorial Board Typeset by Gough Typesetting Services, Dublin [email protected] T: 01 8727305 Gerry Durcan SC Mary O’Toole SC Patrick Dillon Malone BL Conor Dignam BL Adele Murphy BL Brian Kennedy BL Vincent Browne BL Mark O’Connell BL Paul A. McDermott BL Volume 14, Issue 1, February 2009, ISSN 1339-3426 Tom O’Malley BL Patrick Leonard BL Paul McCarthy BL Des Mulhere Jeanne McDonagh Contents Jerry Carroll Consultant Editors: Dermot Gleeson SC Patrick MacEntee SC 2 An Introduction to the CCBE Thomas McCann SC Eoghan Fitzsimons SC DAVID CONLAN SMYTH BL AND JEANNE MCDONAGH Pat Hanratty SC James O’Reilly SC Gerard Hogan SC 4 Virtual Child Pornography: A Victimless Crime? The Bar Review is published by OISÍN CLARKE B.L. Round Hall in association with The Bar Council of Ireland. 11 Round Hall Judicial Review Conference 2008 For all subscription queries contact: NIAMH CLEARY AND RACHAEL WALSH Round Hall Thomson Reuters (Professional) Ireland Limited i Legal Update: 43 Fitzwilliam Place, Dublin 2 Telephone: + 353 1 662 5301 A Guide to Legal Developments from Fax: + 353 1 662 5302 18th November 2008 up to 26th January 2009 E: [email protected] web: www.roundhall.ie Subscriptions: January 2009 to December 13 Case Law on the Mental Health Act 2001: Part 1 2009—6 issues NIALL NOLAN B.L.
    [Show full text]
  • SGRA April 2007 Newsletter
    Sandycove and Glasthule Residents Association Newsletter www.sandycoveandglasthule.ie April 2007 [email protected] Circulation 2,500 Sandycove and Glasthule Residents Association is thriving and active in the Sandycove and Glasthule area. The m ain object of the Association is to prom ote the best interests of the residents of the area. W e regularly publish this newsletter, which is distributed to 2,500 households in the area. The printing of this newsletter is paid for by m em bers‘ subscriptions. If you are a m em ber, thank you. If you are not already a m em ber, please consider joining. An application form is enclosed with this newsletter. (&/&3"- &-&$5*0/ *446& 8 ) "5 5) & $"/% *% "5&4 4": "# 065 -0$"- *446&4 W e received responses from GENERAL ELECTION CANDIDATES W hat they told us (in alphabetical order): A General Election is approaching. There is considerable Barry Andrews, Fianna Fail interest among residents as to where candidates stand on John Bailey, Fine Gael important issues affecting our locality. As a service to resi- Sean Barrett, Fine Gael dents and as a contribution to promoting public interest Richard Boyd Barrett, and participation in issues affecting the area, we decided People Before Profit Alliance to address questions to each of the potential TD candi- Ciaran Cuffe, Green Party dates who have made themselves known to us. These questions were set out in a questionnaire. W e asked each candidate Eamonn Gilmore, Labour to respond so that we might publish a report on the responses in our Mary Hanafin, Fianna Fail next newsletter.
    [Show full text]