DOCSLIB.ORG

Subscription Credit Facilities: a Comparison of Borrowing Base Structures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Subscription Credit Facilities: a Comparison of Borrowing Base Structures Subscription Credit Facilities: A Comparison of Borrowing Base Structures By Kiel Bowen, Todd N. Bundrant, Mark C. Dempsey and Christopher N. Ellis 1 Subscription credit facilities, which are lines of Calculation of the Borrowing Base: A credit in favor of private equity and similar subscription credit facility borrowing base is investment funds primarily secured by the usually calculated by taking (x) uncalled capital commitments of the fund’s investors, capital of each Eligible Investor multiplied are most commonly structured using a by (y) the Advance Rate with respect to such borrowing base structure similar to other Eligible Investor and (z) subtracting any types of asset-backed loans. Many factors will haircuts related to Concentration Limits dictate the best borrowing structure for a and/or Borrowing Base Deductions. fund, the most important of which are the Eligible Investors: The uncalled capital make-up of the fund’s investor pool and commitments of some investors will be where the fund is in its life cycle (raising included in the calculation of the borrowing capital, harvesting investments, etc.). base (“Eligible Investors”) and the uncalled Historically, each market lender has been tied capital commitments of other Investors will to a single borrowing base philosophy that not be (“Excluded Investors”). Determining keyed squarely into its unique credit and which investors will and will not be included underwriting requirements. As industry varies greatly in the different market competition has continued to grow, banks approaches to structuring a borrowing base. have realized that a one-size-fits-all approach Typically, both an investor’s may not be the best long-term approach in creditworthiness and its investor the market. Accordingly, many lenders have documentation (e.g., the existence of a adjusted their credit and underwriting policies problematic side letter provision) will be the to permit more flexibility in structuring key factors in determining if an investor will borrowing bases to better fit a particular be included or excluded from the borrowing fund’s investor pool. Sometimes this has been base. As described below, some borrowing accomplished by adjusting the borrowing base approaches use bright-line categories base inclusion criteria, advance rates or of Eligible Investors, meaning the inclusion concentration limits, while other times, it is process, approval rights, and requirements accomplished by taking a completely different for these categories are explicitly set forth in approach to structuring the borrowing bases. the loan documentation, while other approaches employ more relaxed standards. Prior to discussing the differences between It is important to note, that even though the various borrowing base structures, it is Excluded Investors do not contribute to the helpful to first outline the common tenants of calculation of the Borrowing Base, their the various borrowing base structures: uncalled capital is collateral and, similar to Concentration Limits provide over- other asset-backed lending structures, collateralization. provides the lender with “over- Borrowing Base Deductions: Some lenders collateralization.” may also include deductions from the Exclusion Events: Upon the occurrence of borrowing base that limit the amount certain negative events, Eligible Investors available under the facility. For instance, will automatically be excluded from the recourse debt outside of the facility is borrowing base and become Excluded commonly deducted from the borrowing Investors. Standard exclusion events base on a dollar-for-dollar basis. This include, among others: (a) an investor elects concept is premised on the lender’s to stop funding its commitment or such understanding that all debt (and not just investor repudiates or challenges the their borrowings) should be covered by the enforceability of its commitment; (b) an borrowing base. investor fails to fund its capital contribution With the above background, there are three when due; (c) an investor defaults in any standard borrowing base approaches representation or warranty made in any common in the US subscription facility market: fund document; (d) rated investors fail to (1) a borrowing base of only highly-rated satisfy the applicable requirement (or any included investors with a high advance rate other inclusion standard) or unrated (the “Included Investor Model” or “II Model”); investors have a significant drop in net (2) a two-tier approach, which provides for worth; (e) an investor transfers its interest or both highly-rated included investors with a otherwise ceases to be an investor or high advance rate and a designated investor requests a withdrawal from the fund; and class, where the latter has a lower advance (f) bankruptcy of an investor. rate (the “Included/Designated Model” or the Advance Rates: This is the percentage of “II/DI Model”); and (3) a flat advance rate uncalled capital commitments of each across all (or most) investors (the “Flat Eligible Investor that will be used in the Advance Rate Model”), which may also be calculation of the borrowing base. It is structured as a coverage ratio (the “Coverage typically less than 100% to provide Ratio Model”). additional over-collateralization. Below we explore these traditional structures Concentration Limits: In order to provide and then discuss how these structures are greater risk diversification, concentration evolving to address increased competition limits are often included in subscription and the particular needs of fund borrowers. credit facilities. Concentration limits are restrictions on how much borrowing base A. Included Investor Model credit will be given to any particular In the traditional Included Investor Model, investor’s uncalled capital commitments— only highly-rated investors that meet a often calculated as a percentage of an pre-defined set of criteria (e.g., a minimum individual investor’s uncalled capital credit rating (typically set at BBB+) and, commitment against the total amount of all with respect to pensions, a minimum uncalled capital commitments or all Eligible “funding ratio” (often 90%) or, in some Investor uncalled capital commitments. cases, minimum assets (typically Additionally, aggregate investor class $1 billion)) will be designated Eligible concentration limits might be included. Like Investors (“Rated Included Investors”). For Excluded Investors and Advance Rates, these investors, typically the only approval 2 Mayer Brown | Subscription Credit Facilities: A Comparison of Borrowing Base Structures right is in favor of the administrative agent creditworthiness to include in the (and not any facility lenders). Other non- borrowing base (these investors are rated investors that, in the determination commonly referred to as “Designated of all lenders, would be rated investment- Investors”). The inclusion of any grade if they had a rating (“Non-Rated Designated Investors typically requires all Included Investors”) will also usually be lender consent and has historically Eligible Investors in an II Model. required some evidence of credit- The Advance Rate for all Eligible Investors worthiness or credit support, such as in an II Model is typically set between 80% publicly available financial information or and 100%2 and Concentration Limits have evidence of a strong relationship with a historically been determined by a static creditworthy parent. grid ranging from 5-15%, in each case Advance Rates and Concentration Limits dependent on the Eligible Investor’s rating with respect to Included Investors usually or classification as a Non-Rated Included mirror the Advance Rates and Investor. Non-Rated Included Investors Concentration Limits typically used in the (and sometimes lower-rated Rated II Model. The Advance Rate for Designated Included Investors) are usually also subject Investors is typically set at either 60% or to an aggregate Concentration Limit. 65%. Additionally, Designated Investors Since the borrowing base only includes are usually subject to both individual and uncalled capital commitments of aggregate Concentration Limits. We often investment-grade investors, lenders see a 5% individual Concentration Limit typically offer favorable pricing and looser and an aggregate Concentration Limit of terms compared to other borrowing base 35% with respect to Designated Investors. structures. Funds that use the II Model The II/DI approach is currently the most usually have a diversified class of highly commonly used in the syndicated market. rated investors and use subscription This approach is often used by funds that facilities mostly for bridging purposes— need larger credit facilities with a and not long-term leverage. These funds borrowing base than a traditional II Model typically don’t require high overall or Flat Advance Rate Model approach effective advance rates against the entire would be unlikely to support over the life investor pool because they regularly repay of the fund, and usually offers the highest borrowings and prefer the less expensive overall effective advance rate. To account pricing and looser terms that the II Model for the fact that lower-rated investors are provides. included in the borrowing base, pricing B. Included/Designated Model may be higher than facilities employing the II Model and these facilities may be The Included/Designated Model builds off tighter on other terms and reporting the II Model’s technology. In addition to requirements than the other models. classifying Rated Included Investors
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Private Debt: the Hunt for Yield
    Private Debt: The Hunt For Yield Old Hill Partners, Inc. 1120 Boston Post Road, 2nd Floor Darien, CT 06820 Executive Summary Seven years after the financial crisis and the global onset of ZIRP and QE monetary policies, investors are still confronted with few options when it comes to generating yield from traded credit and equity vehicles. However, economic growth, while measured, has been sufficient to meaningfully lower default rates on privately-placed corporate debt. Accordingly, investors are discovering the qualities inherent in this overlooked and relatively undiscovered asset class, primarily shorter duration and yield premiums in excess of those available from comparable traded credit instruments. At the same time, tighter banking regulations have made it unfeasible and uneconomical for large financial institutions to lend to small and medium-sized businesses - precisely the corporate segment most in need to growth and expansionary capital - and they are increasingly turning to non-bank providers as a source of financing. This situation creates an attractive supply-demand dynamic between the companies that need capital and participants than can provide credit. When properly vetted and constructed, such private debt transactions increasingly offer the potential to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns for prudent investors. © 2015 Old Hill Partners, Inc.. Page 2 of 10 What is Private Debt? Private debt allows investors to act as a direct lender to private companies instead of through an intermediating financial institution. It is generally illiquid and not traded in organized markets, but is backed by corporate credit (such as cash flow), real estate, infrastructure, or other hard, financial or esoteric assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Printmgr File
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q È QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2018 OR ‘ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission File Number 1-11758 (Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 1585 Broadway 36-3145972 (212) 761-4000 (State or other jurisdiction of New York, NY 10036 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) (Registrant’s telephone number, incorporation or organization) (Address of principal executive including area code) offices, including zip code) Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes È No ‘ Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes È No ‘ Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.
    [Show full text]
  • Goldman Sachs Ecosystem New York City, 10005, USA 9212) 902-1000;
    Goldman Sachs Group 200 West Street, Manhattan, Goldman Sachs Ecosystem New York City, 10005, USA 9212) 902-1000; www.goldmansachs.com Outside Relationships Goldman Sachs Group, Inc (Delaware Corporation) Outside Relationships Securities Regulators Capital Suppliers Customers Regulation and Customers Suppliers Capital Regulators Debt Structure Equity Structure NYSE Listing Rules Debt: $ 266.4 Billion; Credit Ratings (Long Terms): DBRS (A – High), Fitch (A), Moody’s (A2), R&I (A), S&P (BBB+) Equity Securities Public Debt Bond Financing Dividends and Common Holders Regulators Group Inc. U.S. Group Inc. Non-U.S. Subsidiaries U.S. Subsidiaries Non- Treasury Stock Preferred Stock Common Stock Stock Repurchases Hybrid Financial Commercial Other Unsecured Significant Working Capital Dollar Fixed and Dollar Fixed and Dollar Fixed and U.S. Dollar Fixed Shares Authorized: 605M Shares Authorized: 496,750 Shares Issued: 901.7M Commercial Instruments Paper Short-Term Shareholders US Securities Financing Floating Rate Floating Rate Floating Rate and Floating Rate Shares Held in Treasury: 557.6M Shares Issued: 420,282 Shares Outstanding: 344.1M Equity Capital and Exchange Banks $18.8B $6.1B Borrowings $2.0B Obligations $117.4B Obligations $54.5B Obligations $25.1B Obligations $16.4B Shares Yet to be Repurchased: 49.7M Shares Outstanding: 420,280 Holders: 6,491 Vanguard Commission Trading Group, Inc (Securities Law Regulators (7.03%) Disclosure and Finance Internal Audit Administration Reporting Governance Corporate Matters Requirements; Anti- Budget
    [Show full text]
  • A Case for Debt Financing in Indian Impact Enterprises by Sudarshan Sampathkumar, Sam Whittemore, Ramraj Pai, and Swasti Saraogi
    Giving Credit Where Due A Case for Debt Financing in Indian Impact Enterprises By Sudarshan Sampathkumar, Sam Whittemore, Ramraj Pai, and Swasti Saraogi The Nonprofit Hiring Toolkit How to find and hire the best talent Byline Collaborating to accelerate social impact NovemberOctober 2020 2016 Table of Contents Foreword ..............................................................................................................................................................................................3 Executive Summary ...............................................................................................................................................................4 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................................5 Financial Data Analysis Shows a Significant Debt Shortfall .............................................7 Investors heavily favour equity in impact enterprises ...............................................................................8 Many impact enterprises demonstrate reasonable credit quality ..................................................10 Barriers to Debt Financing for Impact Enterprises ......................................................................13 Impact enterprises struggle to find and secure loans ...............................................................................13 NBFCs lend when banks shy away ............................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA)
    Dear Sir, Madam, To support the FSB’s evaluation of the effects of financial regulatory reform on small and medium-sized enterprises I am pleased to provide a copy of the Alternative Credit Council’s (ACC) Financing the Economy research on the global private credit market. There are numerous data points and case studies throughout this report that demonstrate how private credit managers are supporting SMEs, and becoming more prominent sources of finance in markets such as real estate finance, trade finance or asset-backed lending. We have conducted this research on an annual basis since 2015 and previous editions of Financing the Economy can be found here. The ACC represents over 170 members that manage more than $400 billion of private credit assets. ACC members provide an important source of funding to the economy by providing finance to mid-market corporates, small and mid-sized enterprises, commercial and residential real estate developments, infrastructure, as well the trade and receivables business. The ACC’s core objectives are to provide direction on policy and regulatory matters, support wider advocacy and educational efforts, and generate industry research with the view to strengthening the sector's sustainability and wider economic and financial benefits. I would be pleased to discuss the contents of this research with you further. Kind regards, Nicholas Smith Nicholas Smith Director, Private Credit T: +44 (0)20 7822 8380 E: [email protected] This message and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. You must not act on or disclose the contents if received in error but should inform us at the address above and delete the message.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Finance ASSET-BASED FINANCE
    corporate finance ASSET-BASED FINANCE lighter covenant structures than cashflow facilities, providing the same degree of leverage. CABL lenders protect their position by thorough monitoring of the asset base. This control, while initially seeming to be an Powerful additional administrative burden for the treasurer, frequently yields benefits to the company in terms of better controls and leveraging reduced working capital. WELL ESTABLISHED CABL has been established in the US for many years (the US market is estimated at some $185bn, according to Asset Based Finance) and has developed into far more than a niche financing product. As well as the ‘traditional’ CABL product for mid-market companies, we have witnessed increasing utilisation of ABL in the ‘top slice’ of large buyouts as an alternative or addition to the revolving credit fund (RCF) tranche. A good example would be the recent – and, at the time, record – $33bn buyout of HCA by Bain Capital, KKR and Merrill Lynch Global PE. A $2bn ABL loan tranche augmented the $21bn of other senior debt, $5bn of second lien and $5bn of common equity. The ABL tranche accommodates the seasonal fluctuations in working capital and carries slightly lower pricing (see Chart 1). Jon Norton of Burdale Financial Limited explains European security laws mean that pan- how comprehensive asset-based lending is making European activity is primarily driven by invoice financing in quasi-securitisation inroads into the UK. structures. However, we do expect sizeable, multi-jurisdictional European CABL transactions to complete in 2007. In the UK, where CABL is still relatively underutilised, Executive summary there is a growing realisation that it is an I Corporate treasurers are finding an increasing need for asset-backed lending which ideal source of funding for borrowers in provides flexible support to the increasingly complex working capital and cash needs of transition who might otherwise face higher- today’s corporates.
    [Show full text]
  • Gcp Asset Backed Income Fund Limited
    GCP ASSET BACKED INCOME FUND LIMITED GCP ASSET BACKED INCOME FUND LIMITED Annual report and financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2019 Annual reportyear ended 31 December 2019 and financial statements for the CONTENTS ABOUT THE COMPANY Introduction GCP Asset Backed Income Fund 1 At a glance – 31 December 2019 Highlights for the year Limited is a listed investment 2 Investment objectives and KPIs 3 Portfolio at a glance company which focuses 4 Chairman’s statement predominantly on investments 6 The Company’s growth since IPO in UK asset backed loans. Strategic report 10 Strategic overview The Company seeks to provide shareholders 12 Business model with attractive risk-adjusted returns through 14 Investment Manager’s report 28 Financial review of the year regular, growing distributions and modest capital 30 Sustainability appreciation over the long term. 32 Risk management The Group is currently invested in a diversified Governance portfolio of asset backed loans across the social 40 Board of Directors infrastructure, property, energy and infrastructure, 42 The Investment Manager 44 Board leadership and purpose and asset finance sectors, located predominantly 45 Stakeholders in the UK. 48 Division of responsibilities 52 Composition, succession and evaluation The Company is a closed-ended investment 54 Audit, risk and internal control company incorporated in Jersey. The Company 58 Remuneration has a premium listing on the Official List of the FCA 61 Directors’ report 63 Statement of Directors’ responsibilities with its shares admitted to trading on the Premium Segment of the Main Market of the LSE since Financial statements 23 October 2015. 66 Independent Auditor’s report 70 Statement of comprehensive income At 31 December 2019, its market capitalisation was 71 Statement of financial position £479.1 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Credit – the Road Less Traveled Spring / Summer 2020
    Alternative Credit – The Road Less Traveled Spring / Summer 2020 Alternative Credit has long described the Ares estimates that the various sectors spectrum of investments and sectors that exist comprising this market represent an overall outside of traditional markets. The investible universe of over $4 trillion in size development and expansion of markets can today. To put that in context, Alternative Credit lead to the formation of new, Alternative Credit presents an investible market roughly equal in sectors. Likewise, market stresses and size to direct lending and private equity markets economic cycles can create mismatches in the combined (illustrated below).3 supply and demand for capital thus creating 1 opportunities for Alternative Credit investors. $4.2 trillion Whatever the root cause, Alternative Credit investments are often aimed at filling gaps $3.0 created by market inefficiencies. By providing trillion Specialty capital solutions that traditional markets do not Assets or cannot, Alternative Credit managers can create value and deliver attractive returns to $1.0 Real 2 investors – often in excess of 10% – despite a trillion Assets credit profile that is protective of principal. Financial Assets The sectors that comprise this market evolve over time. Some become large and established. Direct Lending Private Equity Alternative Credit Occasionally, a sector may become so well established and conventional that it ‘graduates’ Despite the large market size and potential for HEADQUARTERS into the realm of traditional markets where attractive risk-adjusted returns, we find that Ares Management Corporation 2000 Avenue of the Stars investors benefit from greater market liquidity, Alternative Credit is often underrepresented in 12th Floor transparency, standardization and scalability many investors’ portfolios.
    [Show full text]
  • Asset-Based Lending Solutions by Both Specialists and Mainstream Banks
    Capital Thinking Cheap, flexible and in fashion: CFOs are increasingly being offered asset-based lending solutions by both specialists and mainstream banks. Why wouldn’t you use it? We discuss the positives and negatives of ABL. ISSUE 4 FEBRUARY 2015 Just about every lender now has an asset-based financing product, sometimes labelled as structured finance. Why? Cost of capital. A bank’s cost of capital to be precise. The regulatory framework in 2015 sees ABL products carrying a lower cost of capital for a bank, as the loan is directly collateralised. All good for the banks and lenders. Good for corporates too? It certainly can be. Borrowers benefit from a lender’s lower cost of capital in the form of a cheaper margin. ABL products are very flexible and grow with your business. And they go way beyond basic invoice discounting. For CFOs though, buyer beware. The level of funding available goes down, as well as up, with changes in working capital. If you release a one off cash benefit from a new or uprated ABL facility, will your return on that cash be value creating for shareholders? Could you ever afford to not use ABL once you have started? What exactly is asset-based lending (ABL)? Asset-backed lending ABL is a form of secured lending where In this edition of Capital Thinking, Asset-backed lending usually involves some a loan is advanced against specific we look at five areas: form of securitisation, in which a number of assets of the borrower. In practice, the small, individual illiquid assets are sold by 1 Asset-based lending vs cash flow their originators (usually a financial institution) main focus of asset-based lending is lending to an SPV, which in-turn issues fixed-rate on current assets, primarily accounts securities to investors.
    [Show full text]
  • European Mid-Market Debt Update – Spring 2021.Pdf
    European Mid-Market Debt Update MARKET REPORT European Mid-Market Debt Update Socially Distanced Deal Making Goes Viral as Economy Prepares for Recovery from Pandemic Spring 2021 European Mid-Market Debt Update Spring 2021 European Mid-Market Debt Update Executive Summary After an excellent start to 2020 in Q1, deal count contracted heavily in Q2 and Q3 as the pandemic “We are excited to present the spring 2021 edition of unfolded and lenders focused inward, supporting existing clients. In some countries such as the our quarterly market update, in which we provide the UK, decreased deal count was also compounded by banks facilitating government loan schemes. results of our inaugural debt mid-market survey, While market sentiment improved over the summer, we didn't see a strong rebound in deal tracking deals completed by over 50 mid-market activity until Q4 2020. Key drivers for the rebound included pent-up PE demand and high levels of lenders in H2 2020. debt fund dry powder. The desire to deploy capital, combined with a flight to quality and heavy focus on COVID-19 insulated credits, resulted in a supply and demand imbalance and led to pricing We are also delighted to have witnessed a strong and lending terms reverting to pre-pandemic levels. recovery in mid-market deal-making from Q4 2020 onwards. We discuss some of the key trends seen in The pandemic has accelerated the growth of market share held by debt funds. Banks remain cautious on ‘new-to-bank’ lending and have shown less appetite for super senior revolving credit 2020 and our outlook for 2021 in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Intangible Assets in Capital Markets
    Capital choices Intangible assets in capital markets IA for development and commercialisation As intangibles emerge as an asset purposes, even before start up. While funds class, financial firms are developing and firms often differ in structure, these a variety of mechanisms to utilise enterprises work with companies either to buy the IP/IA or invest in the company for them in the capital markets commercialisation of the IP/IA. Due to the private nature of private By Ian Ellis and Kenan Patrick Jarboe equity deals, many details about this group of firms and funds have not been disclosed. Over the past decade, intellectual capital has The large investment bank Deutsche Bank become foundational for many companies, (DB), however, announced publicly that it is while intangible assets – such as currently managing three IP funds totalling intellectual property (whether patents, more than €150 million invested in IP trademarks, copyrights or trade secrets), assets. Partnering with IP Bewertungs AG, brand value, corporate reputation, franchises DB has identified and purchased IP assets and human capital – have emerged as a for further legal and commercial refinement valuable asset class. The capital markets and to be sold and/or licensed. financial system have responded to this Another IA-focused firm, IgniteIP, calls shift. Financial firms have invented new itself a “full-service IP placement vehicles and updated existing models to enterprise” that works with inventors, IP provide capital to companies with owners and investors to commercialise significant value in intangible assets (IA). and/or license IP. IgniteIP’s model differs Based on published reports, we have from the traditional VC model in that it has been able to identify examples of the array paid attention to IP development nearly of models for equity and debt financing independent of the business itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Asset-Backed Finance Opportunities for Private Capital in the Era of Bank Re-Regulation
    ASSET-BACKED FINANCE OPPORTUNITIES FOR PRIVATE CAPITAL IN THE ERA OF BANK RE-REGULATION Brendan McAllister September 2014 ABOUT THE AUTHOR Brendan McAllister Partner & Portfolio Manager Brendan is a Partner and Co-Portfolio Manager of the Pine River Fixed Income Fund. As Head of Mortgage Credit and Asset-Backed Trading, Brendan is a senior member of the team that led Pine River’s highly successful investment initiatives in Non-Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis. He is also a lead- er of Pine River’s efforts in Asset-Backed Finance. Brendan serves as President of The Pine River Foundation and is a member of the firm’s Charitable Initiatives Committee. Prior to joining Pine River in 2008, Brendan served as an Institutional Fixed Income Salesman in the Se- curitized Products group at UBS Securities in New York, specializing in Non-Agency mortgage bonds. He received a BA with a double ma- jor in Economics and Political Science at the University of Rochester. INTRODUCTION It’s an often-fitting analogy to describe financial markets as a system of plumbing that facilitates the sup- ply, demand and movement of capital in the broader economy. Just as plumbing is woven intricately into a city and employs a complex array of supply lines, drains, reservoirs, conditioners and specialty fixtures, the credit market is a complex network of channels and structures through which capital gets from those who have it to those who need it. Perhaps most importantly, both plumbing systems and financial markets share the trait that the flow can be stressed and instantly clogged or even halted by a number of factors.
    [Show full text]