The Cottage Industry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

The Cottage Industry • The Cottage Industry – A family or small group of workers made products from their homes to sell, usually just to earn extra money (not to make a living). Before the Industrial Revolution, this was how products were manufactured. – Merchants (business people) delivered materials to the house – The workers in the house turned the materials into a product to be sold – The merchants returned to collect the product and pay the workers. – The merchants sold the product in other markets. The Cottage Industry The Cottage Industry • Modern Examples: – www.etsy.com – Fredericton Farmers Market – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5UbII_Q0_c – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7vElymyRDQ &feature=related The Factory System • The Factory System – Machines did work that was once done by hand. Workers were paid to operate the machines. – Faster – Cheaper – One machine could do the work of 50 or more people. – Machines were powered by coal, steam or water. The Factory System Cottage Industry Factory System Source of Power Hand Machines Place of Production In the home In the factories Scale of Production Small Scale Large Scale (Large-scale? Small-scale?) Cost of finished product Expensive Cheap Production Capacity Few Many How much could be made? Worker Safety Safe Dangerous Skill Requirements of Must be very skilled to Little or no skill required to Labourers craft products operate machines Speed of producing one Slow. One product made at Very fast. Multiple item a time. products made at once. Cottage vs. Factory Cottage Factory Hand-made products Machine-made products One person makes one One person makes one whole product part of a product Made in the home Made in a factory Expensive to produce Cheap to produce Time consuming Fast Review Slip • Answer the following question: – Why was the Factory System better for England’s economy than the Cottage Industry? .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Mental Strain As Field of Action in the 4Th Industrial Revolution
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia CIRP 17 ( 2014 ) 100 – 105 Variety Management in Manufacturing. Proceedings of the 47th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems Mental strain as field of action in the 4th industrial revolution Uwe DOMBROWSKI, Tobias WAGNER* Institute for Advanced Industrial Management (IFU), Technische Universität Braunschweig, Langer Kamp 19, 38106 Braunschweig * Corresponding author. Tel.: "+49 531 391-2725" ; Fax: +49 531 391-8237. E-mail address: [email protected] Abstract Industrial revolutions have changed the society by a development of key-technologies. The vision of the 4th industrial revolution is triggered by technological concepts and solutions to realize a combination of the economy of scale with the economy of scope. This aim is also known as mass customization and is characterized by handling a high level of complexity with a total network integration of products and production processes. These technology-driven changes also lead to new fields of activity in the industrial science and the occupational psychology. The 4th industrial revolution intends to implement the collaboration between humans and machines. At the same time, processes are locally controlled and planned. For humans, this results to new work items. Resulting psychological effects should be investigated. This paper classifies the 4th industrial revolution systematically and describes future changes for employees. It derives the necessity of labor- psychological analysis of new key technologies like cyber physical systems. A theoretical foundation of a psychological work requirement analysis by using the VERA method is given.
[Show full text]
Technology, Labor, and Mechanized Bodies in Victorian Culture
Syracuse University SURFACE English - Dissertations College of Arts and Sciences 12-2012 The Body Machinic: Technology, Labor, and Mechanized Bodies in Victorian Culture Jessica Kuskey Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/eng_etd Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Kuskey, Jessica, "The Body Machinic: Technology, Labor, and Mechanized Bodies in Victorian Culture" (2012). English - Dissertations. 62. https://surface.syr.edu/eng_etd/62 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in English - Dissertations by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT While recent scholarship focuses on the fluidity or dissolution of the boundary between body and machine, “The Body Machinic” historicizes the emergence of the categories of “human” and “mechanical” labor. Beginning with nineteenth-century debates about the mechanized labor process, these categories became defined in opposition to each other, providing the ideological foundation for a dichotomy that continues to structure thinking about our relation to technology. These perspectives are polarized into technophobic fears of dehumanization and machines “taking over,” or technological determinist celebrations of new technologies as improvements to human life, offering the tempting promise of maximizing human efficiency. “The Body Machinic” argues that both sides to this dichotomy function to mask the ways the apparent body-machine relation is always the product of human social relations that become embedded in the technologies of the labor process. Chapter 1 identifies the emergence of this dichotomy in the 1830s “Factory Question” debates: while critics of the factory system described workers as tools appended to monstrous, living machines, apologists claimed large-scale industrial machinery relieved human toil by replicating the laboring body in structure and function.
[Show full text]
The Domestic System Vs. the Factory System by Sarah Collinge
The Domestic System vs. the Factory System By Sarah Collinge The Domestic System Before the 1700s, people manufactured products in their own homes. These people were considered artisans. They made products by hand, often taking a long time to make each object. While this work was slow, the finished products were of high quality. During the time of the domestic system, it took a great deal of time to produce fabric that could be made into clothing. First, wool was sheared from the sheep and cleaned. It was then spun by spinners and made into yarn. Finally, a skilled weaver wove the yarn using a handloom. It took a significant amount of time and skill to make a single piece of fabric. With the population growing, the need for a large production of goods, especially textiles, was needed. The domestic system was no longer able to provide enough goods to meet the demand. The Factory System In the late 1700s, machines were invented that allowed textiles to be made faster and in larger quan- tities. These new machines replaced hand weavers. The new machines were too large to be housed in one’s home. They also required a power source to make them run. Factories, or mills, were built along rivers, which supplied power. Workers now had to leave their homes each day and travel to a factory to work. Some workers lived too far away from a factory to trav- el back and forth each day. They stayed in tenements or apartments in order to be close to their work.
[Show full text]
Practical Application of the Industry 4.0 Concept in a Steel Company
sustainability Article Practical Application of the Industry 4.0 Concept in a Steel Company Radosław Mi´skiewicz and Radosław Wolniak * Faculty of Organisation and Management, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 10 June 2020; Accepted: 14 July 2020; Published: 17 July 2020 Abstract: The primary aim of this paper was to present and analyze practical solutions of Industry 4.0 as applied in the Re Alloys company. The research question was whether the implementation of the digitization process based on Industry 4.0 resulted in changes to the organizational structure of the company and whether this brought about an improvement in the energy and material efficiency of the company. The research method used in the paper was the case study method. In view of the project’s results, we concluded that implementation of the new solution based on digitalization caused increased energy and material efficiency, often forced by external factors stemming from the operation of competitive markets. Technological changes also require the application of IT technologies and communication systems in managing production. Access to this information is also a chance to gain a competitive advantage. Keywords: Industry 4.0; manufacturing; metals and metal production; digitalization 1. Introduction Today, industrial production is driven by global competition and the need to quickly adapt to ever-changing market requirements [1–3]. Modern production was built on the experiences of the first industrial revolution, streamlining the operations of manufacturing plants; the second revolution, introducing electricity to industry; and the third revolution, automating uniform tasks for production workers [4–6].
[Show full text]
Textile Industry and the Factory System
What might be the advantages of factory weaving WhatWhatWhat isWhat the are are boy dothe the you inmachines workers the see machine here? doing?doing? doing? over cottage industry weaving? This is a picture of workers at the mule- spinning machines making cotton cloth in an English textile mill in 1834. The Textile Industry Invented Textiles: any cloth or goods produced by weaving, knitting or felting. The textile industry developed as a way to solve the problems of the putting-out system (cottage industries) and increase productivity and efficiency. The markets continued to demand more cloth, and the rural workers spinning yarn by hand and weaving cloth on a hand loom could not keep up. Notes: Textile Industry Invented: Cottage industry couldn’t keep up with the demand for textiles. 1767: James Hargreaves invented a compound spinning wheel. It was able to spin 16 threads at one time. He named this invention the Spinning Jenny, after his wife, Jenny. 1769: Richard Arkwright improved on the spinning wheel with his invention of the water frame. This machine involved winding thread through four pairs of rollers operating at varying speeds. What powers the water frame? A water wheel powered the water frame. What might be the advantages of the water frame? What might be the disadvantages of the water frame? 1779: Samuel Crompton made a further improvement on the spinning wheel. By using the mobile carriage of the spinning jenny and the rollers of the water frame, Crompton created a new machine that was able to spin strong yarn, yet also thin enough to be used in the finest fabrics.
[Show full text]
Industrial Revolution
Industrial Revolution Text: http://www.history.com/topics/industrial-revolution Images: Internet / H. Schulz The Industrial Revolution, which took place from the 18th to 19th centuries, was a period during which predominantly agrarian, rural societies in Europe and America became industrial and urban. Prior to the Industrial Revolution, which began in Britain in the late 1700s, manufacturing was often done in people’s homes, using hand tools or basic machines. Industrialization marked a shift to powered, special- purpose machinery, factories and mass production. The iron and textile industries, along with the development of the steam engine, played central roles in the Industrial Revolution, which also saw improved systems of transportation, communication and banking. While industrialization brought about an increased volume and variety of manufactured goods and an improved standard of living for some, it also resulted in often grim employment and living conditions for the poor and working classes. Contents Britain: Birthplace of the Industrial Revolution Innovation and Industrialization Transportation and the Industrial Revolution Communication and Banking in the Industrial Revolution Quality of Life during Industrialization 1 Industrialization Moves Beyond Britain Britain: Birthplace of the Industrial Revolution Before the advent of the Industrial Revolution, most people resided in small, rural communities where their daily existences revolved around farming. Life for the average person was difficult, as incomes were meager, and malnourishment and disease were common. People produced the bulk of their own food, clothing, furniture and tools. Most manufacturing was done in homes or small, rural shops, using hand tools or simple machines. A number of factors contributed to Britain’s role as the birthplace of the Industrial Revolution.
[Show full text]
The Effects of Smart Factory Operational Strategies and System Management on the Innovative Performance of Small- and Medium-Sized Manufacturing Firms
sustainability Article The Effects of Smart Factory Operational Strategies and System Management on the Innovative Performance of Small- and Medium-Sized Manufacturing Firms Rok Lee Department of LINC Plus Project Organization, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea; [email protected]; Tel.: +82-10-6314-4004 Abstract: This study aims to determine the effects of smart factory system management and opera- tional strategies on the innovative performance of small- and medium-sized manufacturing firms. To this end, we administered an empirical survey to 222 hands-on workers who operate smart facto- ries in small- and medium-sized Korean firms. The collected data were analyzed using structural equation modeling and the results showed that the enterprise resource planning (ERP), quality management, ethical management, and productivity management systems had positive effects on innovative performance. The effect of operational strategies on innovative performance was not verified. Consequently, small- and medium-sized firms should focus on establishing ERP systems, which lead to system establishment, standardization of work processes, CEO support and attention, and increase user recognition levels for raising innovative performance. Keywords: smart factory; strategy; innovation performance; Korea Citation: Lee, R. The Effects of Smart Factory Operational Strategies and System Management on the 1. Introduction Innovative Performance of Small- and Workers in smart factory environments monitor the production line and, based on Medium-Sized Manufacturing Firms. recorded data, perform operational management tailored to the productivity and efficiency Sustainability 2021, 13, 3087. of manufacturing the best products with the least resources. In particular, the introduction https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063087 of information and communications technology (ICT) allows for quick and accurate sup- port, and the central system of the smart factory saves time and expenses from product Academic Editor: Roberta Costa distribution to product release.
[Show full text]
LL Industrial Revolution
The Factory System SLMS/10 Inventions Sweatshops •New inventions led to the development of •Many textile factories were given the the “Factory System”, and often one inven- nickname “sweatshops” because of the hot tion led to the creation of another. and sweaty environment maintained within, •The Flying Shuttle by John Kay wove cloth and because the labor was faster, and this created an in- “sweated” out of the workers. creased demand for thread. •The temperatures inside of •James Hargreaves then cre- textile mills were kept warm ated the Spinning Jenny , and and humid in order to prevent Richard Arkwright created the cotton threads from breaking. the Water Frame to spin •The air of a textile factory was filled with thread much faster. The water frame used cotton fibers, and often created lung water to power it, and most early factories diseases in the workers. Eye inflammations, needed to be located close to sources of tuberculosis, deafness and mouth cancers running water. were not uncommon in factory laborers. •Edmund Cartwright created the Power •Early factories had no safety features on Loom -- a fully mechanized way of making machines. It was not difficult to get fingers, cloth. This was a large, dangerous machine hands, arms, hair, clothes or feet caught in that was powered by the steam engine. the machines. Such incidents resulted in •The power loom led to an increased de- disability, disfigurement and death. mand for raw cotton and the creation of the Cotton Gin by Eli Whitney. The Work Day •The work day was long — 12 to 14 hours, six Child Labor days a week, with limited breaks for meals.
[Show full text]
Charles Dickens (1812-1870) the Industrial Revolution
Charles Dickens (1812-1870) Charles Dickens was born in Portsmouth, in the South of England, in 1812. Two years later his family moved to London.When his father was arrested for debts the boy went to work in a factory. He was nine years old. A year later his father left prison and Charles was sent back to school. Dickens’s secret ambition was to write stories. Success came with the publication of the Pickwick Papers (1836). His next novel was Oliver Twist (1838). It was followed by many others like A Christmas Carol (1843) and David Copperfield (1849). With this novel, based on his own life experiences, Dickens reached the height of his fame. He died in 1870 and was buried at Westminster Abbey in Poets’ Corner. He is generally considered one the greatest English novelists and he was the most important writer of the Victorian Age. He described the social conditions of his time, especially of children and poor people. He was very popular in his day and after. The Industrial Revolution From 1760 to 1850 inventions in the textile industry and enormous industrial changes led to extensive industrialization. This was the era of the Industrial Revolution, when production began to be made in factories instead of in the home. The Industrial Revolution took place in Britain because Britain was rich in coal, which provided energy for the factories, and could count on cheap raw materials coming from its colonies. Many people left the countryside and went to live and work in the new large cities. The workers were paid very little and lived in terrible conditions, but the factory owners made a lot of money and became very rich.
[Show full text]
Industrial Revolution Teaching Guide
TEACHING WITH PRIMARY SOURCES Industrial Revolution How does innovation impact people’s lives? In the latter 1700s, inventions in the textile industry in Great Britain were the first signs of major changes in a revolution in production that greatly altered many aspects of society. Steam-powered machines began to do what animals or people had formerly done by hand. Textile mills could produce high quality cloth cheaply and in huge quantities. Factories sprang up, creating new jobs for factory workers but driving individual weavers who usually worked at home out of business and leading to the growth of cities. Industrialization spread to the iron industry, creating greater demands for mining of ore and coal. Soon the factory system spread to the rest of Europe and the United States. For their owners, factories could create great wealth. Workers, however, often toiled for long hours for low pay under harsh working conditions. Industrialization of Agriculture A tremendous growth of machine-power transformed agriculture in the 19th Century. Using factory-produced machinery like the steel plow, the reaper, mowers and threshing machines powered by horses, farmers were able to expand the size of their operations and produce far more than they could when farming was done by hand. The invention of the cotton gin to separate seeds from the cotton fiber made cotton-growing profitable and increased the demand for slaves in Southern states. Over the long term, it greatly reduced the number of people required to produce the nation’s food and fiber. Around 1800, nearly 90 percent of Americans were farm families.
[Show full text]
National Intelligent Manufacturing Standard System Construction
2015) (Version National Intelligent ManufacturingGuidelines Standard System Construction GuidelinesConstruction System (Version 2015) Standard Manufacturing December 2015 Intelligent National Table of Contents I. General Requirements ........................................................................... 2 (i) Guiding ideology .................................................................................. 2 2015) (ii) Basic principle ................................................................................... 3 (iii) Construction target ............................................................................. 4 (Version II. Construction Idea .................................................................................. 6 (i) Fig. 1 Intelligent manufacturing system framework ............................ 7 Guidelines (ii) Structural diagram of intelligent manufacturing standard system ... 17 (iii) Framework of intelligent manufacturing standard system .............. 20 III. Construction Contents ...................................................................... 22 Construction (i) Basic generality standards .................................................................. 22 (ii) Key technique standards ................................System .................................. 27 (iii) Key industries standards .................................................................. 43 Standard IV. Implementation Organization .......................................................... 46 Appendix 1: Terms and Abbreviations
[Show full text]
Capitalism and the Factory System.Pdf
202 Oliver E. Williamson Simon. Herbert A. 1962. "The Architecture of Complexity." Proceedings ofthe American Philosophical Society 106:467-82. Reprinted in Simon. The Sciences ofthe Artificial. 2d CHAPTER 9 ed. Cambridge: MIT Press. 1981. 1972. "Theories of Bounded Rationality." In Decision and Organization, ed. C. McGuire and R. Radner. Amsterdam: North-Holland. 1978."Rationality as a Process and asa Product ofThought." AmericanEconomicRl!View Capitalism and the factory system 68:1-15. Smith. Vernon. ] 974. "Economic Theory and Its Discontents." AmericanEconomicReview 64:320-2. AXEL LEIJONHUFVUD Stigler. George. 1968. The Organization ofIndustry. Homewood, llI.: Richard D. Irwin. Teece, David. 1980. "Economies of Scope and the Scope of the Enterprise." Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1(3):223-45. 9.1 Introduction 1982. "Towards an Economic Theory ofthe Multiproduct Firm." Journal ofEconomic Behavior and Organization 3:39-64. Economic theorizing utilizes, on the one hand, mathematical tech Williamson, Oliver E. 1971. "The Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure niques and, on the other, thought experiments, parables, or stories. Considerations." American Economic Review 61:112-23. Progress may stagnate for various reasons. Sometimes we are held back 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: The Free for lack ofthe technique needed to turn our stories into the raw material Press. for effective scientific work. At other times, we are short ofgood stories 1976. "Franchise Bidding for Natural Monopolies - in General and with Respect to CATV." Bell Journal ofEconomics 7:73-104. to inject meaning into (and perhaps even to draw a moral from) our 1979. "Transaction Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations." models.
[Show full text]