Digital Czech Republic: How We Grow

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Digital Czech Republic: How We Grow Digital Czech Republic: How we grow Report | January 2017 Preface Digital Czech Republic is a McKinsey & Company Insights and aspirations for the different industry report that attempts to provide a holistic view sectors of this report were developed together with of digitization in the Czech Republic. It aims to our sector leaders: Wojtek Bogdan, Viktor Hanzlík, quantify – for the first time – the opportunity that Ivan Jelic, András Kadocsa, Michal Čermák, digitization presents for the Czech economy. Tomáš Karakolev, Peter Kováčik, John Leach, Its aspiration is to help businesses think about Michal Skalský, Daniel Svoboda, Michal Valachovič digitization and to offer a number of sector-specific and Jiří Franta. We are also thankful to David Tan perspectives and potential ambitions. An additional and Sergey Khon from Finalta, who provided us goal is to consider the role of digitization beyond with unique insights on the financial segment. business, and offer policy makers and citizens a Moreover, we would like to thank the experts who point of departure for thinking about digitization. provided their knowledge and expertise to various parts of this report. They are; Sree Ramaswamy, The report also reflects the deep commitment of Henk Broeders, Somesh Khanna, Adrian Booth, McKinsey’s Prague office to Czech economic and Niko Mohr, Peter Peters, Rajat Agarwal, Shankar social development. It continues the tradition of Chandrasekaran, Mukund Sridhar, Karel Dörner previous research, including our study on Czech and Jürgen Meffert. We would like to thank our economic potential (October 2015, in cooperation management consultants – Boris Reznicek, Marek with the Aspen Institute and Forbes), the potential Slobodnik, Dan Kohout, Albert Soukup and Lucie of women in Czech business (April 2012), and the Markova – who have been working together with state of the Czech education sector (September sector experts and contributors in writing this report. 2010). This report is part of a series of publications on digitization across the world. Previous publications include Digital America: A tale of the haves and have-mores (published December 2015), Digital Europe: Pushing the frontier, capturing the benefits (June 2016), The economic essentials of digital strategy (March 2016), and Digital Poland: Capturing the opportunity to join leading global economies (August 2016). We would like to thank the authors of these reports for sharing their expertise and insights with us. Michal Čermák Expert Partner, McKinsey & Company Prague Dan Svoboda Managing Partner, McKinsey & Company Prague About McKinsey & Company McKinsey & Company is a global management About the McKinsey Global Institute consulting firm, deeply committed to helping The McKinsey Global Institute (MGI), the institutions in the private, public, and social sectors business and economics research arm of achieve lasting success. For nine decades, our McKinsey, was established in 1990 to develop primary objective has been to serve as our clients’ a deeper understanding of the evolving global most trusted external adviser. With consultants economy. MGI’s mission is to help leaders in the in more than 100 offices in 62 countries, across commercial, public, and social sectors develop industries and functions, we bring unparalleled a deeper understanding of the evolution of the expertise to clients anywhere in the world. global economy and to provide a fact base that contributes to decision making on critical About McKinsey Prague management and policy issues. The Prague office of McKinsey & Company is a unique blend of talented people, innovative ideas, management excellence, and a long history of relationships with leading Czech and Slovak institutions. Since 1994, we have managed to grow into a large office with a ‘small office feel’, not losing our entrepreneurial roots and spirit. We regularly do pro bono work: most recently, we looked at how to radically improve the outcomes of our primary education system. Equally importantly, we are proud to have raised and developed a number of business and society leaders in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. About Digital McKinsey Digital McKinsey is a global organization that brings together the best of McKinsey’s digital capabilities. Digital McKinsey not only advises but also builds, operates, and transfers capabilities to help our clients create value by reinventing the core of their businesses. Digital McKinsey brings together nearly 2,000 experts from across our global firm – including more than 800 developers, designers, IT architects, data engineers, agile coaches, and advanced analytics experts. Contents 08 In Brief 12 Reaching high: The macroeconomics of digitization 14 Introduction: Opening our eyes to the world 16 Looking up to the bar: Digitization across Europe 20 Understanding growth: Labor productivity 24 Pleasures and pains: How digitization works 30 Setting our ambitions: Productivity growth 32 Choosing your field and setting aspirations: Industry focus 34 Telecommunications 40 Retail 48 Manufacturing 56 Banking 64 Insurance 70 Utilities 76 Construction 82 Healthcare 88 Making a difference for everybody: Businesses, government and individuals 92 Companies: Achieving a successful digital transformation 94 Government: Bringing digitization to citizens 102 Individuals: Fighting for a happier life 106 Summarizing what we learned: Conclusion 110 Contributors 114 Appendix: Methodology of the macroeconomic section Digital Czech Republic: How we grow 7 8 Digital Czech Republic: How we grow In brief Digital Czech Republic: How we grow 9 As with the rest of the world, the Czech Republic Digitization presents different opportunities and is undergoing a digital transition. Its effects on the challenges in different sectors. Companies in economy are not uniform – companies in different each sector need to set bold aspirations to take industry sectors digitize at a different pace and advantage of these trends. This report discusses have to adopt their own aspirations. Meeting possible aspirations and digitization levers in them will enable the Czech Republic to accelerate eight key sectors (telecommunications, retail, productivity and growth. However, digitization manufacturing, banking, insurance, utilities, is the responsibility of all stakeholders – not just construction, and healthcare). The highest- businesses. Policy makers and citizens will also priority levers differ from sector to sector and need to do their part to accelerate digitization and companies need to understand the broader ensure that it works for them. implications of digitization on their competitive advantages and market conduct, and the McKinsey’s Industry Digitization Index captures dynamics in the broader value chain. how digitization is spreading across Europe and provides a picture of companies’ digital Business leaders have already recognized assets, uses, and workers. The index shows that that a digital transformation is necessary, but Europe’s economy is digitizing unevenly, with often struggle to ensure that they take the right large variations across sectors and firms. The approach. We provide “nine key questions” information and communications technology which should help them make the right decision. sector is at the digital frontier. Media and finance are close to the frontier, while large, traditional It would be a mistake to limit digitization to sectors (like construction and healthcare) lag far business. Czech policymakers need to adopt behind. digital technologies to transform the delivery of public services. The Czech Republic ranks 92nd The Czech Republic lags behind Western in the provision of online government services Europe in labor productivity; in nominal terms, – just below Belarus and El Salvador. The the gap stands at 60%. Digitization is a way Government can also help get Czech individuals to narrow that gap, and indeed more digitized and businesses online. Finally, it can change the Czech sectors have seen more productivity way of setting regulation, adopting, for example, growth. By embracing digitization, the Czech a more experimental approach to regulate the Republic can contribute to closing up to 19% of next Uber or Airbnb. the productivity gap. Spread out over 10 years, this would increase Czech GDP by 1.0 – 2.1% Finally, individuals will need to balance the annually. advantages and disadvantages digitization brings to their daily lives and fight to ensure We propose a framework to demonstrate the that in aggregate it brings them a happier life. effects of digitization on different sectors. The Digitization transforms all dimensions of our framework views the effect of digitization as a lives; our careers, our consumption habits, our change in labor productivity resulting from four entrepreneurial opportunities, the way we gather factors: (1) changing legacy product/service information, as well as our social and communal volumes, (2) changing costs, (3) revenue from lives. new products/services and (4) changes in hours worked. Using these factors as a lens explains Digitization is a challenge and all stakeholders why digitization is a boon to some sectors and a will need to find new ways of doing things. curse to others. The authors hope that this report will provide direction in this uncharted territory. 10 Digital Czech Republic: How we grow Digital Czech Republic: How we grow 11 12 Digital Czech Republic: How we grow Reaching high: The macroeconomics of digitization As a child needs to explore the world, our economy needs
Recommended publications
  • List of Participants
    JUNE 26–30, Prague • Andrzej Kremer, Delegation of Poland, Poland List of Participants • Andrzej Relidzynski, Delegation of Poland, Poland • Angeles Gutiérrez, Delegation of Spain, Spain • Aba Dunner, Conference of European Rabbis, • Angelika Enderlein, Bundesamt für zentrale United Kingdom Dienste und offene Vermögensfragen, Germany • Abraham Biderman, Delegation of USA, USA • Anghel Daniel, Delegation of Romania, Romania • Adam Brown, Kaldi Foundation, USA • Ann Lewis, Delegation of USA, USA • Adrianus Van den Berg, Delegation of • Anna Janištinová, Czech Republic the Netherlands, The Netherlands • Anna Lehmann, Commission for Looted Art in • Agnes Peresztegi, Commission for Art Recovery, Europe, Germany Hungary • Anna Rubin, Delegation of USA, USA • Aharon Mor, Delegation of Israel, Israel • Anne Georgeon-Liskenne, Direction des • Achilleas Antoniades, Delegation of Cyprus, Cyprus Archives du ministère des Affaires étrangères et • Aino Lepik von Wirén, Delegation of Estonia, européennes, France Estonia • Anne Rees, Delegation of United Kingdom, United • Alain Goldschläger, Delegation of Canada, Canada Kingdom • Alberto Senderey, American Jewish Joint • Anne Webber, Commission for Looted Art in Europe, Distribution Committee, Argentina United Kingdom • Aleksandar Heina, Delegation of Croatia, Croatia • Anne-Marie Revcolevschi, Delegation of France, • Aleksandar Necak, Federation of Jewish France Communities in Serbia, Serbia • Arda Scholte, Delegation of the Netherlands, The • Aleksandar Pejovic, Delegation of Monetenegro, Netherlands
    [Show full text]
  • The Bosnian War Crimes Chamber: a Successfully Domestic Hybrid Tribunal
    31 THE BOSNIAN WAR CRIMES CHAmbER: A SUCCESSFULLY DOMESTIC HYBRID TRIBUNAL Matteo Godi The Bosnian War Crimes Chamber (BWCC), a locally owned tribunal, holds promise to facilitate reconciliation in Bosnia-Herzegovina (BiH) through the individualization of guilt. The establishment of the BWCC in January 2005 marked a significant step toward establishing rule of law principles in BiH. While Bosnian courts were trying cases immediately after the Dayton Agreement had been signed, international and national concerns arose over the trials’ fairness and effectiveness. The BWCC, an offspring of the International Criminal Court for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), was aimed at addressing these concerns, but has not been free from criticisms. This paper will challenge two of the main critiques advanced against the BWCC—namely, that of being Serb-biased and that of being counterproductive to reconciliation. While the Chamber’s poor outreach efforts have thus far proven counterproductive in making this process effective, targeting individual wrongdoers rather than ethnic groups can potentially avoid the dangerous generalization of guilt that inexorably fuels ethnic division, which was the cause of the Bosnian war in the first place. INTRODUCTION Ten years after the signing of the Dayton Agreement, following international criminal trials by the International Criminal Court for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and ineffective domestic prosecutions, the Bosnian War Crimes Chamber (BWCC) was created by a joint effort of the Office of the High Representative (OHR) of Bosnia-Herzegovina (BiH) and the ICTY. The BWCC, a hybrid court, was meant to address some of the problems of the domestic judiciary in prosecuting war crimes— among them, its partiality and inability to protect itself from political influence.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Range Ballistic Missile Defense in Europe
    Long-Range Ballistic Missile Defense in Europe Steven A. Hildreth Specialist in Missile Defense Carl Ek Specialist in International Relations September 23, 2009 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL34051 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Long-Range Ballistic Missile Defense in Europe Summary In early 2007, after several years of internal discussions and consultations with Poland and the Czech Republic, the Bush Administration formally proposed deploying a ground-based mid- course defense (GMD) element in Europe of the larger Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) to defend against an Iranian missile threat. The system would have included 10 interceptors in Poland, a radar in the Czech Republic, and another radar deployed in a country closer to Iran, all to be completed by 2013 at a reported cost of at least $4 billion. The proposed European BMD capability raised a number of foreign policy challenges in Europe and with Russia. On September 17, 2009, the Obama Administration announced it would cancel the Bush- proposed European BMD program. Instead, Defense Secretary Gates announced U.S. plans to develop and deploy a regional BMD capability that can be deployed around the world on relatively short notice during crises or as the situation may demand. Gates argued this new capability, based primarily around current BMD sensors and interceptors, would be more responsive and adaptable to growing concern over the direction of Iranian short- and medium- range ballistic missile proliferation. This capability would continue to evolve and expand over the next decade. This report is updated for Senate consideration of the defense appropriations bill (H.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Factoring Perspective: Croatia Vs European Union
    Baresa, Suzana, Sinisa Bogdan, and Zoran Ivanovic. 2012. Factoring perspective: Croatia vs European Union. UTMS Journal of Economics 3 (2): 141–166. Preliminary communication (accepted September 21, 2012) FACTORING PERSPECTIVE: CROATIA VS EUROPEAN UNION Suzana Baresa 1 Sinisa Bogdan Zoran Ivanovic Abstract: This paper points out the problems of liquidity, disposal and obtaining funds, inability to collect receivables, delayed payments in times of economic and financial instability and dynamic business upheavals and uncertainty. As a contribution to resolve these issues new alternative methods of financing for business are imposing, one of them is factoring. Although most countries don’t have adequate legal framework, factoring has emerged as the dominant form of financing, whose current status and development points to the prospects of development in the future. In terms of measures and actions which are taken to combat these issues, as well as legislation, many efforts are made at international level in European Union and in Croatia. Overview and description of the factoring development, and indications for further development are presented in relation to the world, the European Union and the Republic of Croatia. This paper also describes factoring comparison among European countries. Key words: factoring, liquidity, delayed payments, Republic Croatia, European Union, receivables. Jel Classification: G32, G33, G35, O52 INTRODUCTION The Republic of Croatia is in the process of accession to the European Union, that process, despite all kinds of problems, requires significant changes to the system-wide. The change has occurred in the whole system of the economy, especially in the financial system. Changes to legislation that had to be coordinated with the European Union have led to significant changes in the area of financial services.
    [Show full text]
  • War Crimes Chamber of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina
    PROSECUTIONS CASE STUDIES SERIES The War Crimes Chamber in Bosnia and Herzegovina: From Hybrid to Domestic Court (2008) ©2008 International Center for Transitional Justice and Bogdan Ivaniševi ć ©2008 International Center for Transitional Justice This document may be cited as Bogdan Ivanišević, The War Crimes Chamber in Bosnia and Herzegovina: From Hybrid to Domestic Court (2008), International Center for Transitional Justice i ABOUT THE ICTJ The International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ) assists countries pursuing accountability for past mass atrocity or human rights abuse. The Center works in societies emerging from repressive rule or armed conflict, as well as in established democracies where historical injustices or systemic abuse remain unresolved. In order to promote justice, peace, and reconciliation, government officials and nongovernmental advocates are likely to consider a variety of transitional justice approaches including both judicial and nonjudicial responses to human rights crimes. The ICTJ assists in the development of integrated, comprehensive, and localized approaches to transitional justice comprising five key elements: prosecuting perpetrators, documenting and acknowledging violations through nonjudicial means such as truth commissions, reforming abusive institutions, providing reparations to victims, and facilitating reconciliation processes. The Center is committed to building local capacity and generally strengthening the emerging field of transitional justice, and works closely with organizations and experts around the world to do so. By working in the field through local languages, the ICTJ provides comparative information, legal and policy analysis, documentation, and strategic research to justice and truth-seeking institutions, nongovernmental organizations, governments, and others. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Bogdan Ivanišević has been a Belgrade-based consultant to the former Yugoslavia Program of the International Center for Transitional Justice since November 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Legacy of War: Minority Returns in the Balkans by Bogdan Ivanisevic
    Legacy of War: Minority Returns in the Balkans By Bogdan Ivanisevic In the territories that comprise the former Yugoslavia—notably Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina (hereafter Bosnia), and Kosovo—the failure of international and domestic efforts to promote the return of refugees and displaced persons has left substantially in place the wartime displacement of ethnic minorities. The Balkan experience offers an important lesson for other post-conflict situations: unless displacement and “ethnic cleansing” are to be accepted as a permanent and acceptable outcome of war, comprehensive and multi-faceted return strategies—with firm implementation and enforcement mechanisms—must be an early priority for peace-building efforts. Post-war efforts in the former Yugoslavia make clear that when these elements are present, minority return progresses; when they are absent, return stalls. In all parts of the former Yugoslavia affected by ethnic wars during the 1990s, persons displaced by war from areas in which they now comprise an ethnic majority were able to return to their homes fairly soon after the end of hostilities. The true measure of effectiveness of the return policies pursued by national authorities and the international community, however, is the extent to which minorities have been able to return. By that measure return has been far less successful. Most minority members are still displaced, and it is increasingly evident that, even if the conditions for return improve in the future, most will not return to their homes. In most areas of return, nationalistic politicians remained in power during the crucial immediate post-war period and either used that power to hinder the return of minorities, or did precious little to facilitate it.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Dr. BOGDAN U
    CURRICULUM VITAE Dr. BOGDAN UUMLI Institute Mihailo Pupin, University of Belgrade Volgina 15, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia http://www.pupin.rs Oce Phone: +381 (0)11 2775 460 Cell Phone: +381 (0)66 9499 050 E-mail: bogdan.uscumlic@{pupin.rs, telecom-bretagne.eu, gmail.com} Homepage: http://www.pupin.rs/en/cv/bogdan-uscumlic-3/; http://perso.telecom-bretagne.eu/bogdanuscumlic/ BIOGRAPHY Bogdan U²¢umli¢ was born on 20 March 1981 in Zrenjanin, Serbia. There he nished the primary school Petar Petrovi¢ Njego² and Zrenjanin's High School. He got the M.Sc. degree in telecommunications from The Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Belgrade, in 2006. Bogdan U²¢umli¢ began the doctoral studies at TELECOM Bretagne in Brest, France in January 2007, and he defended the thesis in April 2010. By defending a dissertation entitled Optical Architecture and Trac Engineering in Optical Metropolitan Networks he acquired the title Doctor of information and communication science and technology. The thesis deals with the trac engineering issues in a WDM ring with optical packet switching and time-discrete access to the medium. The research tools used in this work are discrete time event simulator, developed by adding the new features to Network Simulator (ns-2), the analytical methods of queueing theory and the linear programming optimization techniques. Mentors were Prof. Annie Gravey and Michel Morvan, and thesis director was Prof. Jean-Louis De La Bougrenet Tocnaye. Members of the Commission for the defense of the thesis were: Prof. Bernard Cousin, Dr. Philippe Chanclou, Prof. Marc Sevaux, Prof. Annie Gravey, Prof. Jean-Louis De Bougrenet De La Tocnaye, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Made in the EU: Foxconn in the Czech Republic Rutvica Andrijasevic Devi
    Made in the EU: Foxconn in the Czech Republic Rutvica Andrijasevic Devi Sacchetto Author bios Rutvica Andrijasevic works at School of Management, University of Leicester. Her areas of expertise are gender and work, migration and citizenship and her work has address how contemporary forms of mobility and labour, such as ‘illegality’ and ‘trafficking’ problematize the relationship between free waged labour, rights and citizenship. She is the author of Agency, Migration and Citizenship in Sex Trafficking (Palgrave, 2010) and a member of the editorial collective Feminist Review. Devi Sacchetto works at the Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, University of Padua. His research interests are in labour and migration and he has published on topic of delocalization of production to Eastern Europe, migration and agriculture in Southern Europe, and seafarers’ working conditions. He is the author of Fabbriche Galleggianti. Solitudine e sfruttamento dei nuovi marinai (Jaca Book, 2009). Abstract Next to its 32 factories in mainland China, Foxconn has other 200 factories and subsidiaries around the world on which there is little or no data. This article focuses on plants in the Czech Republic, Foxconn’s most important European site and the hub for export-oriented electronics industry. It asks whether there are similarities between Foxconn’s Chinese and European sites, two locations commonly imagined as separate and opposite in their management practices and treatment of the workforce. Drawing on 60 interviews with workers and privileged informants, the article outlines the labour process, forms of control, composition of labour, the role of the state, and the reach and impact of the trade unions in Foxconn’s Czech plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT 2012 Client inspired banking Everyone deserves an individual approach Annual report 2012 Client inspired banking 2 Contents Survey of Key Data ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������3 Introducing Raiffeisenbank ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������4 Important Events in 2012 ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������5 CEO‘s Statement ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������6 Corporate Social Responsibility Report ����������������������������������������������������������������������������8 Report of the Supervisory Board ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������9 Statutory and Supervisory Bodies���������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 10 Report of the Supervisory Board of Raiffeisenbank a�s� ������������������������������������������������12 Organisational Chart �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������14 Economic Development in the Czech Republic ��������������������������������������������������������������17 Raiffeisenbank’s Market Position �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������18 Financial Section �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Moldova
    Grids & Datums REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA by Clifford J. Mugnier, C.P., C.M.S. “The history of the Republic of Moldova is the history of two different Ottoman authorities, Moldova suffered repeated invasions by Turks, regions that have been joined into one country, but not into one na- Crimean Tatars, and Russians. In 1792 the Treaty of Iasi forced the tion: Bessarabia and Transnistria. Bessarabia, the land between the Ottoman Empire to cede all of its holdings in what is now Transnistria Prut and Nistru rivers, is predominantly ethnic Romanian in popula- to the Russian Empire. An expanded Bessarabia was annexed by, and tion and constitutes the eastern half of a region historically known incorporated into, the Russian Empire following the Russo-Turkish as Moldova or Moldavia (the Soviet-era Russian name). Transnistria War of 1806-12 according to the terms of the Treaty of Bucharest is the Romanian-language name for the land on the east bank of the of 1812. Moldovan territory west of the Prut River was united with Nistru River; the majority of the population there is Slavic -- ethnic Walachia. And in the same year, Alexandru Ioan Cuza was elected Ukrainians and Russians -- although Romanians are the single larg- prince of Walachia and the part of Moldova that lay west of the Prut est ethnic group there. To a great extent, Moldova's history has River, laying the foundations of modern Romania. These two regions been shaped by the foreigners who came to stay and by those who were united in 1861” (Library of Congress Country Studies, 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Name Policy: from Theory to Practice
    Dysertacje Wydziału Neofilologii UAM w Poznaniu 4 Justyna B. Walkowiak Personal Name Policy: From Theory to Practice Wydział Neofilologii UAM w Poznaniu Poznań 2016 Personal Name Policy: From Theory to Practice Dysertacje Wydziału Neofilologii UAM w Poznaniu 4 Justyna B. Walkowiak Personal Name Policy: From Theory to Practice Wydział Neofilologii UAM w Poznaniu Poznań 2016 Projekt okładki: Justyna B. Walkowiak Fotografia na okładce: © http://www.epaveldas.lt Recenzja: dr hab. Witold Maciejewski, prof. Uniwersytetu Humanistycznospołecznego SWPS Copyright by: Justyna B. Walkowiak Wydanie I, Poznań 2016 ISBN 978-83-946017-2-0 *DOI: 10.14746/9788394601720* Wydanie: Wydział Neofilologii UAM w Poznaniu al. Niepodległości 4, 61-874 Poznań e-mail: [email protected] www.wn.amu.edu.pl Table of Contents Preface ............................................................................................................ 9 0. Introduction .............................................................................................. 13 0.1. What this book is about ..................................................................... 13 0.1.1. Policies do not equal law ............................................................ 14 0.1.2. Policies are conscious ................................................................. 16 0.1.3. Policies and society ..................................................................... 17 0.2. Language policy vs. name policy ...................................................... 19 0.2.1. Status planning ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Few Remarks About Bogdan the One-Eyed's Matrimonial Policies In
    Medieval Studies, vol. 22, 2018 / Studia z Dziejów Średniowiecza, tom 22, 2018 Katarzyna Niemczyk (University of Silesia in Katowice) https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-9656-3048 Katarzyna Niemczyk A few remarks about Bogdan the One-Eyed’s matrimonial policies in the context of the conflict between Poland and Moldova in 1509 A few remarks about Bogdan the One-Eyed’s matrimonial policies… Keywords: Bogdan the One-Eyed,The Polish–Moldovan conflict, Elisabeth Jagiellon The war between Poland and Moldova in 1509 was the continuation of a long-standing conflict between these two states. The origins of this problem lies in the time of reign of the Polish King Vladis- laus Jagiellon, who needed money for his struggle with the Teutonic Order. He borrowed a sum of rubles (probably 4,000) from the ruler of Moldova, Peter I, and as a deposit, gave him, among other things, Pokutia. However, the Polish king did not return the money to the ruler of Moldova, and he did not give him Pokutia either.1 This is why, from that time on, Moldova tried to win this lost territory back. Despite many attempts to solve this problem, either by war or negotiations, it remained unresolved at the beginning of the sixteenth century. According to some historians, the reason for Bogdan’s expedition in 1509 was the hope to marry Alexander’s sister, Elisabeth Jagiellon.2 1 Besides Pokutia, Vladislaus Jagiellon gave as a deposit the land of Halych. See B. Poзoв, Укрански грамоты, vol. 1, Kиїві 1928, no. 19; Материалы для истории взаимных отношений России, Польши, Молдавии, Валахии и Турции в XIV–XVI вв.
    [Show full text]