Meeting Minutes of the 802
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
1
Project IEEE 802.20 Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access
Title Draft Meeting Minutes, 802.20 Interim Meeting - Session #20, Jacksonville, LA, USA, May 15-16, 2006
Date 2006-06-07 Submitted
Source(s) Rajat Prakash, Email: [email protected] Recording Secretary for the session QUALCOMM, Incorporated 5775 Morehouse Drive San Diego, CA, 92121
Re: 802.20 Session#20
Abstract Draft of the Minutes of the Session #20;
Purpose Minutes of the Session. This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE 802.20 Working Group. It is offered as a basis for Notice discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this Release contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.20. The contributor is familiar with IEEE patent policy, as outlined in Section 6.3 of the IEEE-SA Standards Patent Board Operations Manual
The 20th session of 802.20 was held at the May 2006 Interim meeting in Jacksonville, Fla.
Contributions and WG documents referenced in these minutes can be found at the 802.20 website, http://www.ieee802.org/20/
See the Appendix C for the overall session attendance and participation credit list.
Minutes of 802.20 Monday May 15, 2006
Meeting started at 11 am.
Chair went over the presentation C802.20-06/27 (Chair’s opening slides ).
Bylaws on Patents Copy Right Rules Logistics of the session. IEEE 802 meeting conduct Sign in procedure for the session (the Chair mentioned that members credit for tutorials is based on the honor system, and members should claim credit for a tutorial if they get) Procedure for sign in for 802.19/802.18. IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards Affiliation Statements
1110am: Discussion of agenda. (included in Appendix B).
Quorum Call: Hand count of voters showed 34.
A Roll Call for Quorum was requested by Jose Puthenkulam: 44 voters present out of 143 as shown in Appendix A. The Chair stated no Quorum was present.
11:30am: Chair projected the agenda (as posted on the website).
Anna Tee requested that posted contributions (19, 20 and 21) be presented. R. Canchi agreed to present (10 minutes) his contribution 21. Jim Tomcik replied that the contribution is clear and does not need presentation. He suggested discussion be carried out through private email or email on the reflector. After further discussion with Anna Tee, Jim Tomcik agreed to discuss 19 and 20 on Tuesday morning. Chair to amend agenda to add 19, 20 and 21 to the morning schedule for Tuesday.
Jose Puthenkulam asked if “current status of letter ballot” item included discussion of the resolutions for LB1. Chair responded that LB1 comments and resolutions are posted on the website. Chair stated LB2 a recirculation was already in ballot. Jose requested that resolution items should be discussed in this meeting, and stated that “the process is not open, and the comments are not being discussed in the WG. The WG is supposed to determine the standard, and not the five members of the BRC”.
Hand count (members only) for approving the agenda: 10 in favor, 2 opposed, 23 abstain. Approved Agenda in Appendix B 3 Regarding Anna Tee’s contribution about the March meeting, chair noted that we will be unable to approve the minutes in this meeting (lack of quorum) and in this meeting we should discuss this and, if needed come up with modified text. Chair suggested he work with Anna Tee during the lunch break.
Jiezhen Lin said she had some comments about the minutes too, and Chair suggested offline discussion. Jim Ragsdale and Jose Puthenkulam also requested time for review of the minutes. After further discussion, chair projected the March minutes (redlined version submitted by Anna Tee). Suggestions for some changes to the text from Jose Puthenkulam and Jim Ragsdale. The chair discussed individual redlined items.
Break for lunch 1230pm. Resume at 140pm. Resume with discussion of ballot resolution process. Presenter of contribution 18 requested delay in presenting the contribution. All Agreed.
Chair started letter ballot status update. Chair requested the members to look at the material on the web page and noted that there has been a change in the approval percentages due to abstain votes being counted the wrong way earlier. Jim Ragsdale requested for an extension of the ballot resolution period, and the chair responded that given this a recirculation, the given deadline is acceptable.
Jose Puthenkulam raised the issue of copyright and the chair replied that correspondence is ongoing between the chair and other organizations to address copyright questions raised. Jose requested to see the letters that have been exchanged between the chair and other organizations. Chair replied he would decide later if the individual emails would be shared. Chair also noted that given there were comments on the ballot regarding copyright questions he felt he should work to resolve the comments.
2pm: Contribution “Systematic problems with current draft” 06-22r1, Alan Jette and James F. Mollenauer. The chair asked the presenters to present a redlined version of the changes in r1 and the presenters gave a redlined version. Disagreement and debate between Doug Knislely who chaired the development of a document refernced and the presenters about this contribution.
Hassan Yaghoobi questioned the completeness of the proposals given that there is some common text between the proposals and existing standards (of other organizations). The chair disagreed with the statement. Hassan Yaghoobi requested for the procedural vice chair’s opinion on this issue. The editor replied that according to IEEE style manual rules (sec 2.5), the permission may be requested as soon as the text is included in the draft, and that there is no requirement that the proposal submitter obtain copyright permission prior to submission.
Jose Puthenkulam (supported by Al Jette) stated that resolving the copyright issue is important, and requested the chair disclose the correspondence with other standards bodies. The chair responded that he sent an email to TIA requesting a copyright permission review for possible common text. Again, Jose requested a copy emails by the Chair. The chair stated he would share official letters as part of the comment resolution.
Anna Tee then read a reference to an IEEE procedures document.
Jim Mollenauer proposed a motion to modify the draft text (since quorum is not present in this meeting, Jim requested that the motion be voted in the July plenary). The chair responded that the ballot is open and this motion is out of order. Jim Ragsdale asked about the correctness of this action given lack of quorum, the chair replied that this is a straw poll and not a motion (because quorum is not met). Al Wieczorek. commented that motions should be allowed without quorum, 4 and future meetings should be able to able to approve/disapprove the motion. Jim responded that he is okay with this item being a straw poll.
Text of straw poll:
The editor be directed to modify the current text as follows Restrict the scope of the draft to the MAC and Physical layers Remove text copied from other standards group Replace this text with reference to 3gpp2 document(s) such as C.S0024.A Add messages to 3gpp2 MAC layer if needed by the new physical layer [removed by movers] Explicitly indicate what parts of 3gpp2 standard are not used [removed in response to Doug’s comment]
Debate on the straw poll. After comment from Doug Knisely, the last item was removed.
After a comment from Jose Puthenkulam, Jim Mollenauer then requested to change this straw poll to a motion. The chair ruled that this is not a valid motion because it is not enforceable even if it got passed with quorum. The chair said that the draft will only change through the ballot process.
Jim Ragsdale that there are only two alternatives: straw poll now, or carry motion forward to next meeting. The chair ruled that the rules allow for the third alternative for a motion to take place during a non-quorum meeting and be revoted in a plenary. However the chair stated that the motion is non-actionable.
Jim Mollenauer said he would like to make this a motion. Seconded by Anna Tee Final form of motion below.
That the 802.20 working group modify the existing text as follows Restrict the scope of the draft to the MAC and Physical layers Remove text copied from other standards group Replace this text with reference to 3GPP2 document(s) such as C.S0024.A
Vote on the motion 28-8-3. Motion passes (this is a technical vote). Chair stated he would rule on the validity on the motion in July Plenary. Break for coffee at 4pm. Resume at 430pm
Contribution: “Proposed traffic modeling ad hoc”. Leonid Razoumov and Hujun Yin, contribution 18. The contributor requested the chair to grant an ad hoc study group to come up with a more realistic traffic model (particularly on the reverse link).
The chair asked the contributor how this is useful given technology selection is completed in the WG. Hassan Yaghoobi suggested that if the ad hoc comes up with recommendations, those could be used to modify the draft in the ballot process. Hassan Yaghoobi also expressed his concern about the way his LB comment (regarding this traffic model issue) was resolved.
Some discussion on the contribution. Jose Puthenkulam and Anna Tee argued in favor of the contributor.
R. Canchi noted that the parameters (traffic mix) themselves are not part of the draft specification, but were used as part of technology selection. Mark Klerer and Jim Tomcik noted that such an ad hoc committee should be formed outside 802.20 to develop real world traffic models for performance evaluation purposes. Jose argued that an outside group may not have the motivation to improve the draft of 802.20 and therefore this work should be done within 802.20. 5 Anna Tee commented on the process by which the evaluation criteria document was formed and said the evaluation criteria document is incomplete. She also referred to the 3GPP2 evaluation methodology and commented that it included a better model for the reverse link.
The chair responded that after weighing all arguments, he would not form an ad hoc.
Jose requested the chair to take a motion to support the formation of an ad hoc. Chair noted that the process requires a motion to reopen the evaluation criteria document (technical vote). Jose argued that the ECD need not be opened at this stage, and the ad hoc should be formed and allowed to complete its work. If the ad hoc decides to change the ECD, it may be through a later motion to open the ECD. The chair replied that for this ad hoc to serve its purpose, the ECD has to be opened, and thus he will take a vote on opening the ECD first.
520pm Motion moved by Jose Puthenkulam and second by Hujun Yin (note, motion was modified through a friendly amendment by Anna Tee). “Motion to initiate adhoc group to develop the traffic models for the reverse link, that are not in the evaluation criteria document based on the deficiencies identified by contribution C802.20-06-18.
Chair ruled that this is a technical vote (reopen the ECD) and needs 75% to pass.
Debate on the motion.
Motion 28 yes, 5 no, 3 abstain. Note that it needs another vote in a meeting with Quorum.
Recess for the day. Will Resume at 8am with contribution 23.
Minutes of 802.20 Tuesday May 16, 2006
Meeting started at 805am.
Presentation “Suggestion for LB Resolution Results” 06/23 Jiezhen Lin and T. Hu.
Anna Tee stated that the WB mode and 625k-MC mode have a different MAC and different PHY, and that this difference is unusual. Anna Tee requested to know the commonalities between the two modes. The editor mentioned some example from 802 that have multiple PHYs and also some examples that have multiple MAC/PHYs.
Presentation 830am: “Suggestions on Improvements for LB1 Comment Resolution Results” 06/24 Anna Tee, C. Koo & DS Park.
Some discussion about the points raised in the above contribution, including discussion on PAPR. Jim Tomcik mentioned that the PAPR issue can be solved by scheduler design and power control design (and that these two algorithms are outside the scope of the spec). Anna Tee referred to her earlier contribution (Mar 2005) for details on the PAPR problem. The chair stated that Anna Tee may mail the contribution (and supporting studies if available) to the reflector, in order to convince the WG about this problem. Anna Tee requested Jim Tomcik to provide data in support of his claim that the scheduler can reduce PAPR.
Mark Klered stated that the letter ballot process requires members to send suggestions along with ballot comments, so that the ballot resolution committee should decide how to act on the comments.
Al Jette requested the following be in the minutes “This contribution and several of the other contribution this week are based on the chair’s actions of forming a closed letter ballot resolution 6 committee and sending to recirculation ballot without having any discussion in the 802.20 WG on the resolution comments. The chair’s steps prevent a fair and open process. These actions prevent a minority of the membership of the group from having the ability to influence development of this standard”. Jose Puthenkulam made a statement supporting the above argument and made a reference to the 802 P&P.
Motion (Anna Tee, second by Jiezhen Lin) Move the WG to improve comment resolution to comment #22, by starting an ad hoc group to investigate the alternative uplink waveform for 802.20, which has a lower peak to average power ratio, e.g. DFT spread OFDM or other alternatives.
The chair questioned if this is a study group that may result in a new PAR. Anna Tee replied that the output of the ad hoc will be a comparison of waveforms that will be used by the WG during ballot resolution. Jim Mollenauer argued in favor of the ad hoc group.
Motion passes 28 yes -6 no -2 abstain. Joanne Wilson asked if this is a technical or procedural vote. The chair said he will rule on this motion in July.
Contribution:930am, 06/26 “Suggestion on a remedy for the missing transmitter and receiver requirements specification in 802.20 standard draft V 1.0” Anna Tee, Changhoi Koo et al.
Jim Ragsdale stated that compliance with the SRD requires the addition of transmitter and receiver requirements to the draft specification.
Motion (Anna Tee, second Hassan Yaghoobi) Move to create a ad hoc group to work on the transmitter and receiver specifications for the 802.20 standard draft to ensure the completeness of the standard draft and compliance with the 802.20 systems requirements document.
Joanne Wilson suggested changing to ad hoc group in above motion (original motion said task group). Vote was 29-4-2. The chair said he will rule on this motion in July. .
Break 10am-1030am. Resume with contribution 25.
Resumed at 1035am.
Contribution 25r1 “IEEE 802.20 comment resolution process for letter ballot I”. Anna Tee, Bill Semper et al.
Debate on the ballot resolution process and the role and membership of the BRC. Jose Puthenkulam questioned the process. Anna Tee stated that the chair has planned a schedule that does not give an opportunity to discuss ballot comments in the WG.
Motion: 1110am (Anna Tee , second by Jose Puthenkulam): To carry out 802.20 WG LB comment resolutions during the working group meeting, as implied in section 7.2.4.21.2 of the 802 P&P.
Rationale: Section 7.2.4.2.2 of the 802 P&P states “normally, the working group meets to resolve the negatives or assigns the task to a ballot resolution group”. The normal method is not being followed, and no valid reason has been given. In addition to the BRG members have not been authorized by the WG by a vote. Also, the mover and seconder and possibly several others have been denied participation in the BRC. 7 Chair ruled that the motion is out of order because the ballot resolution/recirculation procedure was set at March Plenary.
Anna Tee stated that “802.20-06/03 applies to LB1, but the motion applies to all current and future comment resolution procedures.” She also stated the rules for ballot resolution should be revised.
Anna Tee stated that she would like to have a straw poll similar to the previous motion. The chair ruled that he will not take the straw poll because he has already ruled the motion out of order.
Contribution: 1130am 06/19. “Response to C802.20-06-14r1”, Jim Tomcik.
Jim Tomcik stated that this contribution is purely informational, and he does not expect the WG to take any action in response to the contribution. Jim also stated that further information may be obtained through email (privately or on the reflector).
Contribution: 1145am 06/21. “Queries listed in C802.20-06-14r1 on MBTDD and 625k0MC mode” R. Canchi. Contribution was presented.
Contribution: 1155am 06/20. “F-SSCH Performance”, Jim Tomcik.
Jim also stated that further information may be obtained through email (privately or on the reflector).
Recess for lunch, resume at 105pm.
Resumed at 115pm:
Discussion of March minutes. The recording secretary projected the revised minutes on the screen and the minutes were reviewed with input from Anna Tee, Jose Puthenkulam and Jim Ragsdale. All proposed changes were agreed. The Chair stated the revised version would be posted and
Next meeting planning: Jose Puthenkulam asked the chair to meet for four days in July. The chair noted that input.. He stated he did not believe a four day meeting was necessary.
Jose requested a straw poll to see the opinion of the WG about the duration of the next meeting. The chair stated he will do a poll on the reflector to ask a larger set of people what they are planning for contributions. Then the chair will finalize an agenda.
Relative to appeals the chair stated there was an Appeal Hearing Wed afternoon on the Appeal from Jose Puthenkulam and Hassan Yaghoobi. There was also an Executive Committee Rehearing request of an appeal ruling. Chair agreed to put on the reflector the schedule of these hearings when he has a final schedule.
Anna Tee proposed to make a motion, and the chair asked if the motion is related to the current agenda item. Jose Puthenkulam stated that a motion can be made at any time. Text of motion: “Move to cancel the letter ballot”. Anna Tee and second by Al Jette.
Rationale: the letter ballot was initiated in violation of the 802.20 P&P procedures rules in 2.9.2. In addition there are several technical issues that are not addressed in the draft in order to meet the system requirements as highlighted in C802.20-06026 and C802.20-06/15r2; and the ballot comment resolution process is not an open process, as discussed in C802.20-06-25r1. 8 The chair ruled the motion out of order because (1) ballot resolution is ongoing, and (2) this item is already in appeal, and (3) the motion is not related to the agenda item.
The chair noted that the July meeting will likely start on Monday 1pm or later.
Motion to adjourn: Hank Eilts, second by Jim Tomcik. No objections. Meeting Adjourned at 2:30pm
Appendix A: May Last Name First Name Company/Organization Reg. ID Voter Present
Agis Edward Intel Corp 410 M Y
Ahn Jae Young ETRI 2783 M Y
Alamouti Siavash Intel 564 M Y
Arefi Reza Intel 2083 M Y
Canchi Radhakrishna Kyocera 745 M Y
Choi Yang-Seok Intel 642 M Y
Eilts Henry Texas Instruments 2476 M Y
Epstein Mark Qualcomm 999 M Y
Guo Qiang Motorola 871 M Y
Hou Victor Broadcom 2075 M Y
Jette Alan Motorola 2981 M Y
Kiernan Brian Interdigital Com. 577 M Y
Kitamura Takuya Fujitsu M Y
Klerer Mark Qualcomm 1533 M Y
Koo Changhoi Samsung 2379 M Y
Kwon Dong Seung ETRI 1523 M Y
Lee Heesoo ETRI 2797 M Y
Lee Wook-Bong LG Electronics 3092 M Y
Li Jun Nortel Natworks 2524 M Y
Lim Hyoung Kyu Samsung 1234 M Y
Lin Jiezhen Siemens Ltd., China 1764 M Y
Ma Steven Freescale Semi. 2086 M Y
Mollenauer James Technical Strategy/Motorola 205 M Y
Nakamura Tetsuya NTT MCL Inc. M Y
Odlyzko Paul Motorola 433 M Y 9
Park Won-Hyoung Samsung AIT 3171 M Y
Perini Patrick EFR, Inc. 3240 M Y
Pirhonen Riku Nokia 249 M Y
Prakash Rajat Qualcomm 1520 M Y
Puthenkulam Jose Intel M Y
Qian Xiaoshu Intel 3090 M Y
Ragsdale James Ericsson 498 M Y
Son Yeongmoon Samsung 1233 M Y
Suh Changho Samsung Electronics 3147 M Y
Tee Lai-King Anna Samsung M Y
Tomcik James Qualcomm 857 M Y
Upton Jerry JUpton Consulting;Qualcomm 300 M Y
Valbonesi Lucia Motorola 2007 M Y
Watanabe Fujio NTT DoCoMo USA Labs 265 M Y
Wieczorek Alfred Motorola 1331 M Y
Wilson Joanne ArrayComm 1754 M Y
Yaghoobi Hassan Intel 411 M Y
Yeh Choongil ETRI 302 M Y
Yin Hujun Intel M Y
Agrawal Avneesh Qualcomm 2982 M
Ali Murtaza Texas Instruments 1199 M
Alphonse Jean Lucent Technologies 3123 M
Barriac Gwen Qualcomm 2342 M
Bernstein Jeffrey TMG 1327 M
Bravin Nancy Individual 262 M
Bussey Chris Bussey Consulting 447 M
Cai Sean ZTE Communications 678 M
Carlo Jim Huawei 757 M Edmais Computer Services (Brazilian Carneiro Edson Comp.) 1500 M
Carson Peter Qualcomm 979 M
Castell Harold P. BCSI 335 M
Chickneas Jim Consultant/Qualcomm 1346 M 10
Chion Hua Mary ZTE Communications 2093 M
Chong Chia-Chin DoCoMo USA Labs 1192 M
Chun Jin Young LGE 1190 M
Cleveland Joseph Samsung 2788 M
Dean Chris TMG Telecom 2068 M
Dodd Donald Case Communications 337 M
Dorward Lynne Ladcomm Corp 1355 M
Dunn Doug Kyocera TRC 3050 M
Feder Peretz Lucent 184 M
Ferguson Alistair Selbourne Associates 998 M
Freeland Graham Steepest Ascent Ltd 3184 M
Gal Dan Lucent 562 M
Garcia-Alis Daniel Univ. of Strathclyde 618 M
Garg Deepshikha Kyocera TRC 1979 M
Giles Arthur USGT 1820 M Double E Enterprises (Brazilian Gomes Eladio companies int) 1494 M
Gorodetsky Svetlana Gorodetsky Consulting 1410 M
Gorokhov Alexei Qualcomm Inc. 3064 M
Ho Jin-Meng Texas Instruments 519 M
Howard Fred Network Consulting Services 2891 M
Humbert John Sprint 834 M
Huo David Lucent 1853 M
Iimuro Kazuyoshi Kyocera 3183 M
James David S. Oak Global BV M
Jeong Moo Ryong NTT DoCoMo USA Labs 769 M
Jeong Byung-Jang ETRI 3225 M
Ji Tingfang Qualcomm Inc. 3113 M
Jones Dennis Taliesen North Consulting 1252 M
Kadous Tamer Qualcomm 2977 M
Kalhan Amit Kyocera TRC 3049 M 11
Kasch William John Hopkins Univ. 2570 M
Khademi Majid Khademi Consulting 506 M
Khandekar Aamod Qualcomm Inc 2976 M
Khatibi Farrokh Qualcomm 1274 M
Kim Yong Ho LG Electronics 2462 M
Kimura Shigeru Kyocera 791 M
Kitahara Minako Kyocera 602 M
Knisely Douglas Airvana 2943 M
Ko Young-Jo ETRI 3200 M
Kwon Young Hyoun LG Electronics 3087 M
Lalaguna Pablo MedStar 1440 M
Lawrence Lisa CTCI Group 1194 M
Martynov Irina Belgud International 1408 M
Martynov Michael Belgud International 1409 M
McMahon Anthony Steepest Ascent 3101 M
McMillan Donald Adv. Network Tech. Solutions 1010 M
Miyazono Max Qualcomm 2097 M
Murakami Kazuhiro Kyocera 798 M
Murphy Peter Intel Corp. 2621 M
Naguib Ayman Qualcomm 681 M
Naidu Mullaguru Qualcomm 93 M
Nakano Shinji Kyocera TRC 2245 M
Nguyen Nha BCSI 1398 M
Nicolas Julien Kyocera Research 1921 M
Novick Fred Bussey Consulting 1157 M
O'Brien Francis Lucent M
Patzer Steve Intel 122 M
Pfann Eugen Univ. of Strathclyde 3081 M
Ping Luo Panasonic Singapore M
Pittampalli Eshwar Lucent 2802 M
Poisson Sebastien OasisWireless 227 M 12
Polcari Amy Bussey Consulting 501 M
Polsgrove Jim JKB Global 1452 M
Preece Rob BCSI 320 M
Rajkumar Ajay Lucent 440 M 802.20 Proposed Detail Level Agenda – May 2006 Interim, Session #20 Sampath Hemanth HyattQualcomm Regency, Jacksonville, Florida 2633 M Agenda items are for time allocation and adjourn maybe earlier if all agenda items are completed. As approved 5/15/06 Sano Masato Kyocera TRC 2244 M Monday, May 15, 2006 8:00AM – 10:00AM IEEE 802 ShieldsOpening Plenary Judy Ladcomm Corp. 1384 M
Monday, MayShively 15, 2006 11:00ADavidM - 12:30PM (LunchCingular 12:30 Wireless-1:30PM 626 M - Opening Session of 802.20 11:00am-12:30pm - - IEEE IPRSpringer rules and meeting Warren conduct Springer Assoc./Independent 405 M - Logistics for the session - - Quorum StaverCall Doug 3581969Canada Inc. 358 M - - Review of Proposed 802.20 Agenda - - ApprovalSutivong of Agenda including Arak modifications TRUE Corporation 579 M - - Review and approve March Minutes - - Current StatusSuzuki of Letter BallotTomohiro KYOCERA Corp. 3182 M
Monday, MayTeague 15, 2006 1:30PMHarris – 5:00PM Hyatt Qualcomm, Inc. 2978 M 1:30-5:00pm Contributions 1:30-2:15pm C802.20-06/18 - ProposedToro Traffic ModelingSteven Ad Hoc (L. RazoumovSane & Solutions H. Yin) LLC M 2:15-2:45pm C802.20-06/22 - Systematic Problems with Current Draft (A. Jette & J. Mollenauer) 2:45-3:15pm C802.20-06/23 - Suggestion for LB Resolution Results (J. Lin & T.Hu) Trick John Bussey Consulting Break 695 M
3:45:-4:15pm C802.20-06/24 - Suggestions on Improvements for LB1 Comment Resolution Results (A. Tee,
C. Koo & DSUlupinar Park) Fatih Qualcomm 2934 M 4:15-5:00pm C802.20-06/26 - Suggestion on Remedy for Missing Tx/Rx Requirement (A. Tee and others)
Valls Juan Carlos TMG Group 1432 M
Vijayan Rajiv Qualcomm, Inc. 2979 M
Tuesday, VivancoMay 16, 2006 8:00AMSilvia - 12:00PM HyattTMG (B r e a k 1 0 – 1 0 : 3 0 a m ) 1029 M 802.20 Comment Resolution Process for LB1 (A. Tee & Others) 8:00-9:00am C802.20-06/25 Wasilewski Thomas Qualcomm 2034 M Response to 06/14r1 Questions (J. Tomcik) 9:00am-9:30am C802.20-06/19 Response to Queries in 06.14r1 (R. Canchi) 9:30am-10:00am C802.20-06/21 Wu Gang NTT DoCoMo USA Labs 1004 M F-SSCH Performance (J. Tomick) 10:30am-11:00am C802.20-06/20 Other Contributions, if agreed and available Yallapragada Rao Qualcomm 3162 M Tuesday, May 16, 2006 1:00PM – 5:00PM Hyatt (B r e a k 3 : 3 0 – 4 : 0 0 P M ) Other Contributions,Youssefmir if agr eedMichael and available ArrayComm 1:00pm- 2:00pm1582 M New Business 2:00pm- 3:00pm
Next MeetingYuda Planning Tetsuya Kyocera TRC 3:00pm- 3:30pm758 M Close andYuza Adjourn Masaaki NEC infrontia 4:00pm -5:00pm24 M
Appendix B: 13
Appendix C: Attendance and Participation Credit Reg. Last Name First Name Company/Organization ID Attendance May Credit 14
Agis Edward Intel Corp 410 Yes Yes
Ahmadi Sassan Intel 3149 Yes Yes
Ahn Jae Young ETRI 2783 Yes Yes
Alamouti Siavash Intel 564 Yes Yes
Arefi Reza Intel 2083 Yes Yes
Austin Mark OFCOM 1418 Yes No
Baum Kevin Motorola 891 Yes Yes
Bavafa Moussa Broadcom 3348 Yes Yes
Canchi Radhakrishna Kyocera 745 Yes Yes
Chae Suchang ETRI 3478 Yes Yes
Chang Young Bin Samsung 3477 Yes Yes
Chen Yao Samsumg BST 3508 Yes Yes
Cho Soonmi Samsung Electronics 3350 Yes Yes
Choi Yang-Seok Intel 642 Yes Yes
Chong Chia-Chin DoCoMo USA Labs 1192 Yes Yes
Comstock David Huawei 3299 Yes Yes
Eilts Henry Texas Instruments 2476 Yes Yes
El-Rayes Mohamed Samsung 3507 Yes Yes
Epstein Mark Qualcomm 999 Yes Yes
Guo Qiang Motorola 871 Yes Yes
Herold Barry Motorola 1026 Yes No
Hong Songnam Samsung 3447 Yes Yes
Hou Victor Broadcom 2075 Yes Yes
Hu Rose Nortel 3269 Yes Yes
Hu Teck Siemens 3483 Yes Yes
Hur Yerang Posdata America R&D 763 Yes Yes
Ikeda Yutaka Sharp Corporation 3448 Yes No
Jette Alan Motorola 2981 Yes Yes
Ji Baowei Samsung TA 1222 Yes Yes
Joo Pan Yuh Samsung 1242 Yes Yes
Kiernan Brian Interdigital Com. 577 Yes Yes
Kim Tae Young Samsung 2901 Yes Yes 15
Kim Young-Ho Samsung 1425 Yes Yes
Kim Youngsoo Samsung 47 Yes Yes
Kim Hyeon Soo Samsung 3656 Yes Yes
Kim Jae-Ho ETRI 3543 Yes Yes
Kitamura Takuya Fujitsu 1277 Yes Yes
Klerer Mark Qualcomm 1533 Yes Yes
Knisely Douglas Airvana 2943 Yes Yes
Kolze Tom Broadcom 932 Yes Yes
Koo Changhoi Samsung 2379 Yes Yes
Koplyay Ferenc Freescale 3423 Yes Yes
Kwon Dong Seung ETRI 1523 Yes Yes
Lee Heesoo ETRI 2797 Yes Yes
Lee Wook-Bong LG Electronics 3092 Yes Yes
Lestable Thierry SERI 3563 Yes Yes
Li Jun Nortel Natworks 2524 Yes Yes
Li Thomas Huawei 2166 Yes Yes
Li Yingyang Samsung BST 3556 Yes Yes
Lim Hyoung Kyu Samsung 1234 Yes Yes
Lin Jiezhen Siemens Ltd., China 1764 Yes Yes
Liu Walter Huawei 3387 Yes Yes
Lu Jianmin Huawei 3001 Yes Yes
Ma Steven Freescale Semi. 2086 Yes Yes
Mollenauer James Technical Strategy/Motorola 205 Yes Yes
Noh Taegyun ETRI 3542 Yes Yes
Odlyzko Paul Motorola 433 Yes Yes
Oguma Hiroshi Institute MIyagi Pref 43 Yes Yes
Oh Changyoon Samsung 3452 Yes Yes
Ovadia Shlomo Intel 321 Yes Yes
Panicker John Nortel 3369 Yes Yes
Park Chul ERTI 1435 Yes Yes
Park DS Samsung 1373 Yes Yes
Park Jeongho Samsung 3448 Yes Yes 16
Park Won-Hyoung Samsung AIT 3171 Yes Yes
Patzer Steve Intel 122 Yes Yes
Perini Patrick EFR, Inc./IPWireless 3240 Yes No
Pirhonen Riku Nokia 249 Yes Yes
Prakash Rajat Qualcomm 1520 Yes Yes
Puthenkulam Jose Intel 451 Yes Yes
Qian Xiaoshu Intel 3090 Yes Yes
Ragsdale James Ericsson 498 Yes Yes
Rajadurai Rajavelsamy Samsung India Software 3510 Yes Yes
Roy Richard SRA, Inc. 953 Yes No Samsung India Software Santhanakrishnan Anand (SISO) 3503 Yes Yes
Sasaki Shigenobu Niigata University 3352 Yes Yes
Semper Bill Samsung 3609 Yes Yes
Seo Bangwon ETRI 3541 Yes Yes
Shoji Hiryuki Kyocera 3628 Yes Yes
Shono Takashi Intel 83 Yes Yes
Sihn Gyung Chul ETRI 3523 Yes Yes
Son Yeongmoon Samsung 1233 Yes Yes
Song Young Seog ETRI 3393 Yes Yes
Srinivasan Roshni Intel 3485 Yes Yes
Stuby Richard Agere Systems 1699 Yes Yes
Suh Changho Samsung Electronics 3147 Yes Yes
Suh Mark Samsung TA 3565 Yes Yes
Surcobe Valentin Motorola 2896 Yes Yes
Tee Lai-King Anna Samsung 844 Yes Yes
Tomcik James Qualcomm 857 Yes Yes
Upton Jerry JUpton Consulting;Qualcomm 300 Yes Yes
Vaidya Rahul Samsung 3502 Yes Yes
Valbonesi Lucia Motorola 2007 Yes Yes
Warren Craig Freescale 293 Yes No
Wieczorek Alfred Motorola 1331 Yes Yes 17
Wilson Joanne ArrayComm 1754 Yes Yes
Wu Geng Nortel 230 Yes Yes
Yaghoobi Hassan Intel 411 Yes Yes
Yeh Choongil ETRI 302 Yes Yes
Yin Hujun Intel 924 Yes Yes
Yun Jungnam POSDATA 266 Yes Yes