TO:William Walsh, CPPB, Buyer Manager

M E M O R A N D U M

TO: William Walsh, CPPB, buyer Manager DTMB, Purchasing Operations

DATE: September 13, 2011

FROM: Lymon C. Hunter, CPPB DTMB, Purchasing Operations - MRO

RE: Award Summary and Synopsis for RFP No. 071I1300229(B) Armed Security Guard Services – DTMB - MI State Fairgrounds

I. Background Information/General: This Request for Proposal (RFP) sought proposals to establish a contract(s) for armed security guard service for the Michigan State Fairgrounds as detailed on the attached listing and on the requisition. Article I is designed to provide bidders with information requirements associated with this RFP.

The RFP package was posted to the bid4michigan website on August 1, 2011

II. Buyer (or Joint Evaluation Committee): All RFP responses were evaluated by:

Lymon C. Hunter, CPPB DTMB-Purchasing Operations Jeff Pratt DTMB – Security & Emergency Management

III. Bidders: A total of 13 bidders submitted proposals for this RFP by the published due date of August 22, 2011. Bidders’ are as follows:

MI Name CRO SDV Address City / State Pass Business YES YES NO 11685 Mt. Elliott Ave. Burton, MI Lagarda Security NO Guardian Guard NO NO 20800 Southfield Rd. Southfield, MI YES YES Services NO YES 5160 Falconview Ave SE Kentwood, MI YES YES DK Security Services Strategic Protection NO NO 25900 Greenfield, Ste 144 Oak Park, MI YES YES Group Axiom Protection NO NO 20600 Eureka Road, #510 Taylor, MI YES YES Group Miller Protection NO NO 313 East Baltimore Street Detroit, MI YES YES Services NO NO 15565 Northland Dr, Ste YES YES Southfield, MI 200W Advance Security 20150 Livernois Detroit, MI YES YES Pyratech Security NO NO NO NO 16250 Northland Drive Suite YES YES Southfield, MI 363 Prudential Protective NO NO 3 Parklane Blvd., Suite 1130 YES YES Dearborn, MI W. Securitas, USA All Pro Security NO NO 17356 W. 12 Mile Road Southfield, MI YES NO Services Teachout Security NO NO 2348 Stone Bridge Drive Flint, MI YES NO Page 1 of 6 NO NO 29200 Vassar Suite 240 Livonia, MI YES NO G4S Secure Solutions

of 6 3.021 Method of Evaluation In awarding the Contract, proposals will be evaluated by a Joint Evaluation Committee (chaired by DTMB Purchasing Operations).

3.022 Technical Proposal Evaluation Criteria The following chart represents the scoring of the particular factors:

STEP 01: TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA . Bidders will be evaluated based on their proposed approach to meeting the detailed Armed Security Guard specifications identified in STEP 2 (i.e., Work Plan).

STEP 02: TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA

. Bidders that complete and pass STEP 1 and achieve a minimum score of 80 points in STEP 2 will be placed on a “Pre-Qualified Bidder Pool for Armed Security Guard Services - Statewide and be eligible to submit proposals for any Contracts that expire between 10/1/11 and 09/30/16 subject to submitting the certifications and representations. Agencies may utilize the pre-qualified Bidder pool for Contractors handled under their delegated authority. . Bidder is to prepare (as part of its proposal), the company/organization’s approach to meeting the State’s specifications in response to the Location Specification Sheet (LSS) with a complete work plan. Responses should follow the outline below. The following chart represents the scoring of the particular factors.

. 1. Company Information, And Capabilities (Article 4.011) 10

2. Company’s Prior Experience, and References 40 (Article 4.012) 3. Staff Training & Development; Health Safety & Environmental Protection (Article 20 4.013) 4. Quality Assurance, Control Plan, and 10 Customer Service (Article 4.016) 5. Location Work Plan (Article 4.017) 20 TOTAL 100

Oral Presentation Bidders who submit proposals may be required to make oral presentations of their proposals to the State. These presentations provide an opportunity for the Bidders to clarify the proposals through mutual understanding. Purchasing Operations will schedule these presentations, if required.

3.023 Price Evaluation (a) Only those proposals receiving a score of 80 points or more in the technical proposal evaluation will have their pricing evaluated to be considered for award.

(b) Evaluation of price proposals includes consideration for a Qualified Disabled Veteran Preference. 1984 PA 431, as amended, establishes a preference of up to 10% for businesses owned by qualified disabled veterans meeting the minimum point threshold for passing.

(c) The State reserves the right to consider economic impact on the State when evaluating proposal pricing. This includes, but is not limited to: job creation, job retention, tax revenue implications, and other economic considerations.

3.024 Award Recommendation The award recommendation will be made to the responsive and responsible Bidder who offers the best value to the State of Michigan. Best value will be determined by the Bidder meeting the minimum point threshold and offering the best combination of the factors stated in Section 3.022, and price, as demonstrated by its proposal.

of 6 Evaluation Results:

Please see bid-file for detailed breakdown of bidders’ evaluation summary and technical proposal. See the following tables for all scores.

Locatio Technical n Plan CRITERIA: Criteria: Criteria: Total: d ) g & n s n t i e a n c p n i

o n n i d ) a 0 t o ) a r e s i 4 r a t t ) s t s ( T ) t u

p s a n s s

t p s t e

9 p m r s p

( a a 5 r t ) )

P t t o ( A m

0 o s s n

6 y ( f t t c d t o o e e (

e y l c

n p p e n t c T T S s I i i p n

- g - l

m e n f l e 0 0 i e i n y a b b p m l e l i a 1 2 i m I g f n u u u o ( ( p r a f n l p , n i a i i p e S a S u Q e t n t p F ) u u p v n o Q s S q x i

S e t m t o i E E n p o D

r o f C 0 n i f o i 1 a g a r ( r t e P T Bidder Name: S R Lagarda Security 10 32 18 10 70.00 8 6 0 14.0 84.00 Yes Guardian Guard Services 10 40 20 10 80.00 9 6 5 20.0 100.00 Yes DK Security Services 9 40 20 10 79.00 9 5 5 19.0 98.00 Yes Strategic Protection Group 7 32 20 10 69.00 9 6 3 18.0 87.00 Yes Axiom Protection Group 10 40 20 10 80.00 9 6 5 20 100.00 Yes Miller Protection Services 10 40 20 10 80.00 9 6 5 20 100.00 Yes Advance Security 10 40 20 8 78.00 9 6 3 18 96.00 Yes Pyratech Security 7 40 18 8 73.00 7 6 5 18 91.00 Yes Prudential Protective 10 40 16 9 75.00 7 4 5 16 91.00 Yes Securitas, USA 9 36 20 6 71.00 9 0 0 9 80.00 Yes All Pro Security Services 8 30 18 6 62.00 7 2 2 11.0 73.00 No Teachout Security Solution 7 20 16 4 47.00 9 4 0 13 60.00 No G4S Secure Solutions 7 20 14 6 47.00 9 0 5 14 61.00 No

of 6 Award recommendation is made for Advance Security reflective of a final score of 96.0 based on Company Information, Prior Experience, Staff Development & Training, Quality Assurance, Location Work Plan, and lowest total cost of ownership for qualified bidders. The overall best value is to recommend the award to Advance Security even after applying the 10% preference for the presence of a Qualified Disabled Veteran bidder (DK Security). This recommendation reflects the lowest total cost to the State of Michigan. See table below for award amounts.

Bidder Address City/State/Zip/Phone Award Amount Name Southfield, MI 48075 248.355.0500 15565

Northland Advance $1,304,040.0 Dr, Ste Security 0 200W

$1,304,040 TOTAL: .00

of 6 JEC Members Signatures:

______Signature Date

 Reviewed and approved by: ______