SMART Goal Worksheet

Building SMART Goal Overview School: Klem North Team Name: Building Leadership Team Leader: Steve LaMonica

Team Members: Steve LaMonica, Lou Bircher, Jan Miller, Jeff Darling, Lorene Guentner, Chris Pratt, Laurie Collins

District Goals: Webster Schools strive for excellence in education. Each building and content area will demonstrate improved students achievement toward excellence as evidenced by multiple measures focused on individual student growth. School Goals: During the 2008-2009 school year, All Klem North Students will improve performance in Language Arts as measured by New York State ELA Assessment, DRA, and /or AIMSweb data. Each grade level will determine specific growth based on current and past student performance. Current State: See Grade level reality and SMART goals. See Grade level SMART goals for Specific Action Steps, Strategies and Timelines

Strategies Professional Development Team SMART Goals and Responsibility Timeline Evidence of Effectiveness and/or Resource(s) Needed Action Steps 100% Klem North Collaboration- students will make at 1. Teaching staff will move from least one years the initiation /developing growth and 90% of stage toward the sustaining students below the stage as measured by the average range will Professional Learning reach average range Continuum. by the end of the year A. Implementation of a pilot schedule Building Lead September Adoption and execution of the according to Aimsweb which imbeds grade level /PLC times Teachers, new schedule. aggregate scores. within the regular school day. Administration, Teaching staff. B. Teams will set SMART goals Grade K: which support building and district Current Reality: goals and help to focus their work Grade Level PLC End of October Completed SMART goals for Early literacy and to monitor student learning. teams each grade level Measures at Fall benchmark for Staff Development around RTI LNF- Grade level log which process and concepts. RTI Above 73% includes minutes and training BOCES Below 27% products, i.e. learning LSF- outcomes, enduring Above 64% 2. The development and understandings and essential Below 36% implementation of RTI questions. SMART Goal: moving Klem North as IST, SST, The average rate of measured by the RTI Intervention September Refining the student review improvement for KN Configuration Map. specialist, -November process to include Grand kindergarten students psychologist, Rounds to develop an on Letter sound A. Refining the student review Lead Teachers effective process. fluency will be at a process used in the building. (IST and rate of .9 sounds per and SST) Administration. week. Building SMART Goal Overview First: Common formative Guaranteed Viable Curriculum, Current Reality: Curriculum – PLC teams will identify Grade level October - June Assessments developed including enduring Early literacy and pace essential understandings collaborative around the identified essential understandings , essential Measures at fall (exit outcomes) in ELA utilizing teams, LT, learnings. questions and big ideas benchmark for standards documents, curriculum curriculum LNF- guides and textbooks. supervisors Aimsweb- Common Formative Above-58% Fall, Winter, Assessment Below-42% Assessments – Spring as well Results from AIMSweb DRA, LSF- Standardized assessments will be IST, SST, as periodically NYS Assessments. AIMSweb training Above-40% administered and Collaborative Intervention for those being -Progress monitoring Below-60% Teams will analyze data, monitor specialist, progressed PSF- students progress and adjust psychologist, monitored. Above-51% instruction and/or Lead Teachers DRA Fall Data analysis and progress Below-49% Interventions. (AIMSweb benchmark and Spring monitoring NWF- assessments, -NYS assessments Administration. NYS Above-47% -DRA ) assessments at Below-53% scheduled SMART Goal: times. KN first grade Teams will develop and implement Grade level Throughout the Common formative students will improve local common formative grade level collaborative year assessments at each grade their reading rate by assessments to monitor students’ teams level. 1.8% weekly as acquisition of essential measured by the understandings, and adjust Aimsweb RCBM instruction appropriately.

Instruction – Initiate individual and Second: small group programs to provide Current Reality: additional intervention and learning Throughout the Results from AIMSweb RCBM- time for all students. Utilize a variety year DRA,NYS Assessments Above 59% of instructional strategies to increase Below-41% students’ proficiency as they learn the SMART Goal: Essential Skills. Using AIMSweb Throughout the subtest RCBM in the year Spring of 2009, 2nd graders will score an average of 110 words correct. Implement EWYP (development of leveled book room). Third: -Increasing teachers’ capacity to August-June Current Reality: match students reading levels to RCBM- appropriate instructional and Above-59% independent reading level text. Below-41% Maze- Above-69% Building SMART Goal Overview Below-31% SMART Goal: All KN Third graders will achieve an average growth rate of 1.5 words read correctly per week as measured by the AIMSweb RCBM

Fourth: Current Reality: RCBM- Above-76% Below-24% Maze- Above-81% Below-19% SMART Goal: All KN fourth grade students will demonstrate an increase in fluency and comprehension as measured by the AIMsweb RCBM and Maze measurements.

Fifth: Current Reality: RCBM- Above-67% Below-33% Maze- Above-75% Below-25% SMART Goal: All fifth grade students will receive a score of 37 (90%) in the spring 2009 Maze.