540 by Shuhai Xiao1, Guy M. Narbonne2, Chuanming Zhou3, Marc Laflamme4, Dmitriy V. Grazhdankin5, Malgorzata Moczydlowska-Vidal6, Huan Cui7 Towards an Ediacaran Time Scale: Problems, Protocols, and Prospects 1 Department of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA. E-mail:
[email protected] 2 Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada 3 Key Laboratory of Economic Stratigraphy and Palaeogeography, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China 4 University of Toronto Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, Ontario L5L 1C6, Canada 5 Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, prospekt Akademika Koptyuga 3, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia 6 Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Villavägen 16, SE 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden 7 Department of Geoscience and NASA Astrobiology Institute, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA (Received: 23/12/2015; Accepted: 4/9/2016) DOI:10.18814/epiiugs/2016/v39i4/103886 The Ediacaran Period follows the Cryogenian data to constrain the age, duration, and global extent of Period in the wake of a snowball Earth glaciation and the Shuram negative δ13C excursion, to calibrate and precedes the Cambrian Period with its rising tide of correlate Ediacaran acanthomorph biozones, and to animal radiation. It is also the longest among all determine the temporal relationship among the Shuram stratigraphically