DOCSLIB.ORG

Pars Equality Center V. Trump

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pars Equality Center V. Trump Case 1:17-cv-00255-TSC Document 35 Filed 03/15/17 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PARS EQUALITY CENTER, IRANIAN Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-255 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL IRANIAN AMERICAN Hon. Tanya S. Chutkan COUNCIL, PUBLIC AFFAIRS ALLIANCE OF IRANIAN AMERICANS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP et al., Defendants. PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Plaintiffs1—individual Iranian nationals and four national Iranian-American organizations—hereby move for a preliminary injunction as set forth below and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction (“Memorandum”). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a). Plaintiffs seek to enjoin Defendants from enforcing or implementing certain provisions of President Donald J. Trump’s Executive Order No. 13,780, entitled “Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States.” As demonstrated in the Memorandum, the Executive Order and Defendants’ 1 This Motion for a preliminary injunction is filed, by and through undersigned counsel, on behalf of organizational Plaintiffs Pars Equality Center, Iranian American Bar Association, National Iranian American Council and Public Affairs Alliance of Iranian Americans, Inc. as well as individual Plaintiffs Ali Asaei, Shiva Hissong, John Doe #1, John Doe #3, John Doe #5, on behalf of himself and his minor child Baby Doe #1, John Doe #7, John Doe #8, Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #4, Jane Doe #8, Jane Doe #9, Jane Doe #10, Jane Doe #11, Jane Doe #12, and Jane Doe #13. The remaining individual Plaintiffs were harmed by Defendants’ conduct and remain Plaintiffs in the above-captioned matter for purposes of seeking permanent relief. Case 1:17-cv-00255-TSC Document 35 Filed 03/15/17 Page 2 of 3 implementation of it violate the First and Fifth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, the Immigration and Nationality Act and its implementing regulations, and the Administrative Procedure Act. Defendants should be enjoined from enforcing or implementing §§ 2(c)-(e), 3, 6(a), and 6(c) of the Executive Order. Pursuant to Local Rule 7(m), counsel for Plaintiffs state that they have conferred with opposing counsel regarding the filing of this motion for preliminary injunction. Defendants intend to file a response to the motion for preliminary injunction in accordance with the Court’s scheduling order. Dkt. 33. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court grant their Motion for Preliminary Injunction. A proposed Order is attached hereto. 2 Case 1:17-cv-00255-TSC Document 35 Filed 03/15/17 Page 3 of 3 Dated: March 15, 2017 Respectfully submitted, /s/ John A. Freedman Cyrus Mehri (D.C. Bar # 420970) John A. Freedman (D.C. Bar # 453075) Joanna K. Wasik (D.C. Bar # 1027916) David P. Gersch (D.C. Bar # 367469) Amelia Friedman (D.C. Bar # 1033583) R. Stanton Jones (D.C. Bar # 987088) MEHRI & SKALET, PLLC Nancy L. Perkins (D.C. Bar # 421574) 1250 Connecticut Ave., NW Ronald A. Schechter (D.C. Bar # 245019) Suite 300 Robert N. Weiner (D.C. Bar # 298133) Washington, DC 20036 Samuel M. Witten (D.C. Bar # 378008) (202) 822-5100 Lindsey D. Carson (D.C. Bar # 992620) (202) 822-4997 (fax) Sally L. Pei (D.C. Bar # 1030194) [email protected] Sonia Tabriz (D.C. Bar # 1025020) Stephen K. Wirth (D.C. Bar # 1034038) Kristen Clarke (D.C. Bar # 973885) ARNOLD & PORTER Jon Greenbaum (D.C. Bar # 489887) KAYE SCHOLER LLP LAWYERS’ COMMITTEE FOR 601 Massachusetts Ave., NW CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW Washington, DC 20001 1401 New York Ave., NW (202) 942-5000 Suite 400 (202) 942-5999 (fax) Washington, DC 20005 [email protected] (202) 662-8600 (202) 783-0857 (fax) Christopher M. Odell* [email protected] ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP 700 Louisiana Street, Suite 1600 Houston, TX 77002 (713) 576-2400 (713) 576-2499 (fax) [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiffs *Pro hac vice motion forthcoming 3 Case 1:17-cv-00255-TSC Document 35-1 Filed 03/15/17 Page 1 of 54 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PARS EQUALITY CENTER, IRANIAN No. 1:17-cv-255 (TSC) AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL IRANIAN AMERICAN Electronically Filed COUNCIL, PUBLIC AFFAIRS ALLIANCE OF IRANIAN AMERICANS, INC., et al., Hon. Tanya S. Chutkan Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Case 1:17-cv-00255-TSC Document 35-1 Filed 03/15/17 Page 2 of 54 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ...................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 FACTUAL BACKGROUND......................................................................................................... 5 A. Mr. Trump’s Campaign Pledge to Ban Muslims from the United States............... 5 B. The January 27 Executive Order............................................................................. 6 C. Defendants’ Chaotic Implementation of the January 27 Executive Order ............. 9 D. Multiple Courts Enjoin Enforcement of the January 27 Executive Order............ 10 E. President Trump Announces Plans to Revise the January 27 Executive Order ... 12 F. The March 6 Executive Order............................................................................... 14 G. Effects of the March 6 Executive Order on Plaintiffs........................................... 18 ARGUMENT…………................................................................................................................ 23 I. Plaintiffs Are Likely To Succeed on the Merits of Each of Their Claims........................ 24 A. Establishment Clause............................................................................................ 24 B. Equal Protection.................................................................................................... 28 1. The March 6 Executive Order Fails Strict Scrutiny.................................. 28 2. The March 6 Executive Order Fails Even Rational-Basis Review........... 31 C. Due Process........................................................................................................... 32 D. Administrative Procedure Act............................................................................... 33 1. Defendants’ Actions Are Contrary to the INA and Implementing Regulations. .............................................................................................. 33 2. Defendants’ Actions Disregard APA Procedural Requirements. ............. 40 i Case 1:17-cv-00255-TSC Document 35-1 Filed 03/15/17 Page 3 of 54 I. Plaintiffs Will Suffer Immediate, Irreparable Harm Absent Preliminary Relief.............. 40 II. The Balance of the Equities and the Public Interest Support Preliminary Relief............. 42 CONCLUSION............................................................................................................................. 45 ii Case 1:17-cv-00255-TSC Document 35-1 Filed 03/15/17 Page 4 of 54 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) CASES Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. Brewer, 818 F.3d 901 (9th Cir. 2015) ...................................................................................................45 Aziz v. Trump, No. 17-cv-116, 2017 WL 386549 (E.D. Va. Jan. 28, 2017)....................................................10 Aziz v. Trump, No. 17-cv-116, 2017 WL 580855 (E.D. Va. Feb. 13, 2017) ...................................................12 Bonham v. D.C. Library Admin., 989 F.2d 1242 (D.C. Cir. 1993).........................................................................................24, 25 CBS Corp. v. FCC, 785 F.3d 699 (D.C. Cir. 2015)...........................................................................................37, 40 Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520 (1993).................................................................................................................25 City of Cleburne, Tex. v. Cleburne Living Ctr., 473 U.S. 432 (1985).................................................................................................................31 City of New Orleans v. Dukes, 427 U.S. 297 (1976).................................................................................................................28 City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469 (1989).................................................................................................................30 Darweesh v. Trump, No. 17-cv-480, 2017 WL 388504 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 28, 2017)...................................................10 Gordon v. Holder, 632 F.3d 722 (D.C. Cir. 2011).................................................................................................23 Graham v. Richardson, 403 U.S. 365 (1971).................................................................................................................28 Haitian Centers Council, Inc. v. McNary, 807 F. Supp. 928 (E.D.N.Y. 1992) ..........................................................................................35 Harisiades v. Shaughnessy, 342 U.S. 580 (1952).................................................................................................................28 Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980).................................................................................................................28 iii
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Department of Injustice Under Jeff Sessions the Department of Injustice Under Jeff Sessions January 2019
    January 2019 The Department of Injustice Under Jeff Sessions The Department of Injustice Under Jeff Sessions January 2019 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 VOTING RIGHTS 2 IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS 3 CRIMINAL JUSTICE 6 DISABILITIES 9 HEALTH CARE 10 RELIGIOUS LIBERTY 10 LGBT RIGHTS 10 CRIMINALIZATION OF POVERTY 11 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 12 WORKERS' RIGHTS 12 FREE PRESS AND PROTEST RIGHTS 12 PRIVACY RIGHTS 13 SEPARATION OF POWERS 15 POLITICIZED ANALYSIS AND PERSONNEL 15 INTRODUCTION Jeff Sessions' tenure at the Department of Justice was a national disgrace. As attorney general, he was entrusted to enforce federal laws — including civil rights laws — and secure equal justice for all. Instead, Sessions systematically undermined our civil rights and liberties, dismantled legal protections for the vulnerable and persecuted, and politicized the Justice Department's powers in ways that threaten American democracy. When President Donald Trump and his political appointees elsewhere in his administration tried to do the same, often in violation of the Constitution, Sessions' Justice Department went into overdrive manufacturing legal and factual justifications on their behalf and defending the unjust actions in court. Sessions was aided by Trump-approved appointees who often overruled career attorneys and staffers committed to a high level of neutral professionalism. Under Sessions' political leadership, these Trump appointees have inflicted significant damage in the past two years. Together they have threatened the First Amendment rights of the press and protesters, targeted the communities Trump disfavors through discriminatory policies and tactics, attacked the ability of ordinary citizens to vote and change their elected government, vindictively retaliated against perceived political opponents, and thwarted congressional oversight of the Justice Department's activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Iranian-American's Perceptions of Prejudice and Discrimination
    Interpersona | An International Journal on Personal Relationships interpersona.psychopen.eu | 1981-6472 Articles Iranian-American’s Perceptions of Prejudice and Discrimination: Differences Between Muslim, Jewish, and Non-Religious Iranian-Americans Shari Paige* a, Elaine Hatfield a, Lu Liang a [a] University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA. Abstract Recent political events have created a political and social climate in the United States that promotes prejudice against Middle Eastern, Iranian, and Muslim peoples. In this study, we were interested in investigating two major questions: (1) How much ethnic harassment do Iranian-American men and women from various religious backgrounds (Muslim, Jewish, or no religious affiliation at all) perceive in their day-to-day interactions? (2) To what extent does the possession of stereotypical Middle Eastern, Iranian, or Muslim traits (an accent, dark skin, wearing of religious symbols, traditional garb, etc.) spark prejudice and thus the perception of ethnic harassment? Subjects were recruited from two very different sources: (1) shoppers at grocery stores in Iranian-American neighborhoods in Los Angeles, and (2) a survey posted on an online survey site. A total of 338 Iranian-Americans, ages 18 and older, completed an in-person or online questionnaire that included the following: a request for demographic information, an assessment of religious preferences, a survey of how “typically” Iranian-American Muslim or Iranian-American Jewish the respondents’ traits were, and the Ethnic Harassment Experiences Scale. One surprise was that, in general, our participants reported experiencing a great deal of ethnic harassment. As predicted, Iranian-American Muslim men perceived the most discrimination—far more discrimination than did American Muslim women.
    [Show full text]
  • The Democrats Unite Handily
    20160829_postal_cover61404-postal.qxd 8/9/2016 6:40 PM Page 1 August 29, 2016 $4.99 MICHAELICHAEL KNOX BERAN:: ANDREW STUTTAFORD: CHARLES C. W. COOKE:: TRUMP’S NIXON PROJECT THE ROBOT THREAT BEHOLD A GUN SHOW WHY RACE RELATIONS GOT WORSEJ.J. D.D. VANCE VANCE www.nationalreview.com base_new_milliken-mar 22.qxd 7/11/2016 3:41 PM Page 1 NATIONAL REVIEW INSTITUTE ANNOUNCES THE 3rd Annual HONORING SECRETARY GEORGE P. SHULTZ FOR HIS ROLE IN DEFEATING COMMUNISM WILLIAM F. BUCKLEY JR. PRIZE FOR LEADERSHIP IN POLITICAL THOUGHT MICHAEL W. GREBE THE LYNDE AND HARRY BRADLEY FOUNDATION WILLIAM F. BUCKLEY JR. PRIZE FOR LEADERSHIP IN SUPPORTING LIBERTY THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 CITY HALL SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA For his entire life, Bill Buckley sought to preserve and buttress the foundations of our free society. To honor his achievement and inspire others, National Review Institute’s Board of Trustees has created the William F. Buckley Jr. Prizes for Leadership in Political Thought and Leadership in Supporting Liberty. We hope you will join us this year in San Francisco to support the National Review mission. For reservations and additional information contact Alexandra Zimmern, National Review Institute, at 212.849.2858 or www.nrinstitute.org/wfbprize www.nrinstitute.org National Review Institute (NRI) is the sister nonprofit educational organization of the National Review magazine. NRI is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. EIN#13-3649537 TOC-new_QXP-1127940144.qxp 8/10/2016 2:43 PM Page 1 Contents AUGUST 29, 2016 | VOLUME LXVIII, NO. 15 | www.nationalreview.com ON THE COVER Page 23 Stephen D.
    [Show full text]
  • Iranian-Americans in Orange County, California: a Survey of Socioeconomic, Attitudinal, and Demographic Characteristics ______
    IRANIAN-AMERICANS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA: A SURVEY OF SOCIOECONOMIC, ATTITUDINAL, AND DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS ____________________________________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, Fullerton ____________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Sociology ____________________________________ By Daniel Dariush Tanara Thesis Committee Approval: Professor Berna Torr, Chair Professor Eileen Walsh, Department of Sociology Professor Anthony Alvarez, Department of Sociology Fall, 2017 ABSTRACT The latest data from US Census (2013) estimate the Iranian immigrant population at 470,000 in the US and 215,000 (46%) in California. Los Angeles County has the highest concentration of Iranian immigrants population. Orange County, adjacent to L.A. County, is the second largest concentration of Iranian immigrants with estimated population of 36,000. Unfortunately not much is known about this small group of immigrants beyond the basic demographics provided by the census data. Census data suggest that Iranian immigration continue to grow. The preferred destination for most is Orange County, specifically south Orange County that is the most affluent section of the County. In order to better understand the characteristics of this growing immigrant population, I conducted a pilot study of the socioeconomic and attitudinal characteristics of the Iranian immigrant population in city of Mission Viejo in Orange County. The scope of the study was limited mainly due to budget constraints, however, the purpose of the study is not just to collect data, but provide guidelines for more comprehensive, larger study/ies. The data were collected via an online survey in both English and Persian, that included questions outside the scope of the Census, including religions and religiosity, political affiliation, civic engagement, health, and sexual orientation, as well as basic demographics (e.g., age, gender, marital status, etc.) of 1st, 1.5, and 2nd generations of the Iranian immigrants.
    [Show full text]
  • 20200130 USCCR Statement on Iranian Americans
    The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Expresses Concern Over Treatment of Iranian Americans January 30, 2020 The U. S. Commission on Civil Rights, by unanimous vote, expresses deep concern over the treatment of Iranians and Iranian Americans in airports, and calls on the Department of Homeland Security to take all necessary steps immediately to ensure equitable treatment of all people at America’s borders and on the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties to investigate reports of discriminatory treatment of Iranians and Iranian Americans at our borders and within the United States. In early 2020, news reports emerged of Iranians – including American citizens who are of Iranian descent – who were subjected to particular and intense scrutiny by Customs and Border Patrol agents.1 This is in addition to the multiple news reports of Iranians with valid visas who were subjected to similar scrutiny, and in some instances barred from actually entering the United States.2 Further, it seems that these actions are not based on any particularized suspicion or security risk.3 Accordingly, these reports 1 Zolan Kanno-Youngs, Mike Baker, and Mariel Padilla, “U.S. Stops Dozens of Iranian-Americans Returning From Canada,” New York Times, Jan. 5, 2020, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/05/us/politics/iranian-americans-border.html; Lloyd Grove, “Iran- Born Ivy League Professor Detained and Grilled About Soleimani at JFK,” The Daily Beast, Jan. 6, 2020, https://www.thedailybeast.com/iranian-americans-detained-and-grilled-at-us-checkpoints-after-trump- kills-soleimani. 2 Caleb Hampton and Caitlin Dickerson, “‘Demeaned and Humiliated’: What Happened to These Iranians at U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Leveraging Social Science Expertise in Immigration Policymaking
    Copyright 2018 by Ming H. Chen Northwestern University Law Review Vol. 112 LEVERAGING SOCIAL SCIENCE EXPERTISE IN IMMIGRATION POLICYMAKING Ming H. Chen ABSTRACT— The longstanding uncertainty about how policymakers should grapple with social science demonstrating racism persists in the modern administrative state. This Essay examines the uses and misuses of social science and expertise in immigration policymaking. More specifically, it highlights three immigration policies that dismiss social scientific findings and expertise as part of presidential and agency decision- making: border control, crime control, and extreme vetting of refugees to prevent terrorism. The Essay claims that these rejections of expertise undermine both substantive and procedural protections for immigrants and undermine important functions of the administrative state as a curb on irrationality in policymaking. It concludes by suggesting administrative, political, and judicial mechanisms that would encourage policymakers to leverage expertise and curb irrationality in immigration policymaking. AUTHOR— Associate Professor, University of Colorado Law and Political Science; Faculty-Director, CU Immigration Law & Policy Program; Visiting Scholar, University of California at Berkeley Center for the Study of Law & Society; Ph.D., University of California at Berkeley; J.D., NYU Law School. Thank you to Osagie Obasogie and the eCRT Working Group for inspiring this Essay. Thoughtful discussion from a 2018 Law & Society Association Roundtable and comments from Ingrid Eagly, Jill Family, Shannon Gleeson, Megan Hall, Sharon Jacobs, Huyen Pham, Emily Ryo, Reuel Schiller, Jonathan Weinberg, Travis Weiner, and the Northwestern University Law Review student editors, especially Maggie Houseknecht, helped improve this Essay. 281 N O R T H W E S T E R N U N I V E R S I T Y L A W R E V I E W O N L I N E INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Community Organizations Filed a Lawsuit in the United States District
    Case 1:19-cv-07993-GBD Document 1 Filed 08/27/19 Page 1 of 117 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MAKE THE ROAD NEW YORK, AFRICAN SERVICES COMMITTEE, ASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION, CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES (ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORK), and CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC., Plaintiffs, - against - COMPLAINT KEN CUCCINELLI, in his official capacity as Acting Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES; KEVIN K. McALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security; and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Defendants. Plaintiffs Make the Road New York (“MRNY”), African Services Committee (“ASC”), Asian American Federation (“AAF”), Catholic Charities Community Services (Archdiocese of New York) (“CCCS-NY”), and Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc. (“CLINIC”), for their Complaint against defendants Ken Cuccinelli and Kevin K. McAleenan, in their respective official capacities; the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”); and the United States Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), allege as follows: PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. Defendants have promulgated a rule (the “Rule”)1 that seeks to deny lawful permanent residence in the United States to millions of law-abiding aspiring immigrants with low incomes and limited assets. Most of them are the husbands and wives, parents and 1 See Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds, 84 Fed. Reg. 41,292 (Aug. 14, 2019) (to be codified at 8 C.F.R. pts. 103, 212, 213, 214, 245, 248). Case 1:19-cv-07993-GBD Document 1 Filed 08/27/19 Page 2 of 117 children of U.S. citizens. For the first time in history, the Rule would impose a wealth test on the primary doorway to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • “USC Engineering and I Grew up Together,” Viterbi Likes to Say
    Published by the University of Southern California Volume 2 Issue 2 Let There Be Light A Revolution in BioMed Imaging Small and Deadly A Proper Name Searching for Air A Proper Name Pollution Solutions Viterbis Name School of Engineering Digital Reunion Reuniting the Parthenon and its Art Spring/Summer 2004 One man’s algorithm changed the way the world communicates. One couple’s generosity has the potential to do even more. Andrew J. Viterbi: Presenting The University of Southern California’s • Inventor of the Viterbi Algorithm, the basis of Andrew and Erna Viterbi School of Engineering. all of today’s cell phone communications • The co-founder of Qualcomm • Co-developer of CDMA cell phone technology More than 40 years ago, we believed in Andrew Viterbi and granted him a Ph.D. • Member of the National Academy of Engineering, the National Academy of Sciences and the Today, he clearly believes in us. He and his wife of nearly 45 years have offered American Academy of Arts and Sciences • Recipient of the Shannon Award, the Marconi Foundation Award, the Christopher Columbus us their name and the largest naming gift for any school of engineering in the country. With the Award and the IEEE Alexander Graham Bell Medal • USC Engineering Alumnus, Ph.D., 1962 invention of the Viterbi Algorithm, Andrew J. Viterbi made it possible for hundreds of millions of The USC Viterbi School of Engineering: • Ranked #8 in the country (#4 among private cell phone users to communicate simultaneously, without interference. With this generous gift, he universities) by U.S. News & World Report • Faculty includes 23 members of the National further elevates the status of this proud institution, known from this day forward as USC‘s Andrew Academy of Engineering, three winners of the Shannon Award and one co-winner of the 2003 Turing Award and Erna Viterbi School of Engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Groups and Library of Congress Subject Headings
    Ethnic Groups and Library of Congress Subject Headings Jeffre INTRODUCTION tricks for success in doing African studies research3. One of the challenges of studying ethnic Several sections of the article touch on subject head- groups is the abundant and changing terminology as- ings related to African studies. sociated with these groups and their study. This arti- Sanford Berman authored at least two works cle explains the Library of Congress subject headings about Library of Congress subject headings for ethnic (LCSH) that relate to ethnic groups, ethnology, and groups. His contentious 1991 article Things are ethnic diversity and how they are used in libraries. A seldom what they seem: Finding multicultural materi- database that uses a controlled vocabulary, such as als in library catalogs4 describes what he viewed as LCSH, can be invaluable when doing research on LCSH shortcomings at that time that related to ethnic ethnic groups, because it can help searchers conduct groups and to other aspects of multiculturalism. searches that are precise and comprehensive. Interestingly, this article notes an inequity in the use Keyword searching is an ineffective way of of the term God in subject headings. When referring conducting ethnic studies research because so many to the Christian God, there was no qualification by individual ethnic groups are known by so many differ- religion after the term. but for other religions there ent names. Take the Mohawk lndians for example. was. For example the heading God-History of They are also known as the Canienga Indians, the doctrines is a heading for Christian works, and God Caughnawaga Indians, the Kaniakehaka Indians, (Judaism)-History of doctrines for works on Juda- the Mohaqu Indians, the Saint Regis Indians, and ism.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Updates Eriade Hunter
    The Modern American Volume 2 Article 11 Issue 1 Spring 2006 2006 Legislative Updates Eriade Hunter Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/tma Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, and the Law and Society Commons Recommended Citation Hunter, Eriade. “Legislative Updates.” The odeM rn American, Spring 2006, 35. This Legislative Updates is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in The odeM rn American by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Legislative Updates Keywords Civil Rights Amendments Act of 2005, African-Americans Act, Medicaid Obesity Treatment Act of 2005, Condemning bigotry, violence, and discrimination against Iranian-Americans, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders Higher Education Enhancement Act This legislative updates is available in The odeM rn American: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/tma/vol2/iss1/11 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES By Eriade Hunter* H. R. 288 Civil Rights Amendments Act of 2005 S. 2160 Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders Higher Introduced by Representative Towns (D-NY) Education Enhancement Act This bill will amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Introduced by Senator Boxer (D-CA) Fair Housing Act to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex- This bill aims to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 ual orientation and will be known as the “Civil Rights Amend- to include Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference of the Birds: Iranian-Americans, Ethnic Business, and Identity Delia Walker-Jones Macalester College, [email protected]
    Macalester College DigitalCommons@Macalester College Geography Honors Projects Geography Department 4-26-2017 Conference of the Birds: Iranian-Americans, Ethnic Business, and Identity Delia Walker-Jones Macalester College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/geography_honors Part of the Geography Commons Recommended Citation Walker-Jones, Delia, "Conference of the Birds: Iranian-Americans, Ethnic Business, and Identity" (2017). Geography Honors Projects. 52. http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/geography_honors/52 This Honors Project - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Geography Department at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geography Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Conference of the Birds: Iranian-Americans, Ethnic Business, and Identity Delia Walker-Jones Macalester College Advisor: Professor Holly Barcus Geography Department 04/26/2017 CONFERENCE OF THE BIRDS 1 Abstract The United States is home to the largest population of Iranians outside of Iran, an immigrant group that slowly emerged over the latter half of the 20th century, spurred by the 1979 Iranian Revolution and subsequent unrest in the mid-2000s. This case study explores the Iranian and Iranian-American-identifying population of the United States, with a geographic focus on the Twin Cities metro area in Minnesota. It delves into several
    [Show full text]
  • BACKGROUNDER No
    BACKGROUNDER No. 3212 | JULY 5, 2017 The U.S. Refugee Admissions Program: A Roadmap for Reform Olivia Enos, David Inserra, and Joshua Meservey Abstract The U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) is at the center of seri- Key Points ous debate within American society, the courts, and among policymak- ers. The USRAP should not be used as pretext to advocate for a global n The U.S. refugee admission pro- right to migrate nor is it a solution to conflict. Instead, the U.S. refugee grams advances U.S. interests, but admission program should be reformed to better advance U.S. interests. targeted reforms are necessary. USRAP asserts American leadership, helps partners and allies in a tan- n Refugees undergo more vetting gible way, and rescues some of the world’s most vulnerable people. Con- than any other immigrants to the gress and the Administration can strengthen the USRAP in ways that U.S., but policymakers should will lessen the security challenges—including through improvements to make critical improvements. vetting procedures—and improve the economic, fiscal, and assimilation n The most difficult radicalization outcomes for refugees. This roadmap for reforming the USRAP ensures challenge is with children resettled that the program continues to serve U.S. interests, support our allies, at a young age, or the children of resettled refugees. and help those in greatest need. n Refugees will inevitably adopt n Section 6 of Executive Order 13780 issued on March 6, 2017, some of the forms of American cul- ture, but it is not a given that they President Donald Trump temporarily suspended the U.S.
    [Show full text]