DOCSLIB.ORG

Inspecteurs Waterstaat Vóór 1850 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Inspecteurs Waterstaat Vóór 1850 3 Nummer Toegang: 2.16.06 Inventaris van het archief van de Inspecteurs en Commissies van de Waterstaat in Nederland, (1551) 1798-1849 (1870) Versie: 12-04-2021 H. Bonder Nationaal Archief, Den Haag 1952 This finding aid is written in Dutch. 2.16.06 Inspecteurs Waterstaat vóór 1850 3 INHOUDSOPGAVE Beschrijving van het archief......................................................................................7 Aanwijzingen voor de gebruiker................................................................................................9 Openbaarheidsbeperkingen.......................................................................................................9 Beperkingen aan het gebruik......................................................................................................9 Materiële beperkingen................................................................................................................9 Aanvraaginstructie...................................................................................................................... 9 Citeerinstructie............................................................................................................................ 9 Archiefvorming.........................................................................................................................10 Geschiedenis van de archiefvormer..........................................................................................10 Geschiedenis van het archiefbeheer.........................................................................................16 De verwerving van het archief..............................................................................................18 Inhoud en structuur van het archief.........................................................................................19 Selectie en vernietiging.............................................................................................................19 Verantwoording van de bewerking...........................................................................................19 Ordening van het archief...........................................................................................................19 Verwant materiaal....................................................................................................................20 Beschikbaarheid van kopieën...................................................................................................20 Afgescheiden archiefmateriaal.................................................................................................20 Verwante archieven.................................................................................................................. 20 Beschrijving van de series en archiefbestanddelen................................................21 01 CHRISTIAAN BRUNINGS EN FREDERIK WILLEM CONRAD........................................................21 01.1 Ambtelijke stukken.............................................................................................................................23 01.1.1 Betreffende algemene zaken.....................................................................................................23 01.1.2 Betreffende bijzondere zaken....................................................................................................25 01.1.2.01 Friesland...........................................................................................................................25 01.1.2.02 Groningen........................................................................................................................26 01.1.2.03 Drenthe............................................................................................................................26 01.1.2.04 Overijssel..........................................................................................................................26 01.1.2.05 Gelderland.......................................................................................................................26 01.1.2.06 Utrecht.............................................................................................................................26 01.1.2.07 Noord-Holland.................................................................................................................27 01.1.2.08 Zuid-Holland...................................................................................................................29 01.1.2.09 Zeeland............................................................................................................................30 01.1.2.10 Noord-Brabant.................................................................................................................30 01.2 Persoonlijke stukken..........................................................................................................................31 01.2.1 Van Chr. Brunings........................................................................................................................31 01.2.2 Van F.W. Conrad..........................................................................................................................33 02 CORNELIS RUDOLPHUS THEODORUS KRAYENHOFF..............................................................36 02.1 Verschillende waterstaatsfuncties....................................................................................................36 03 PLEUNUS LORENTZ...................................................................................................................39 03.1 Opzichter van de fortificaties en commies........................................................................................39 04 JAN BLANKEN JZN..................................................................................................................... 41 04.1 Stukken betreffende algemene zaken...............................................................................................41 04.1.1 Persoonlijke aangelegenheden, rapporten, instructies, e.d.....................................................41 04.1.2 Zeeweringen en verdedigingswerken.......................................................................................42 04.1.3 Rivieren, dijken, enz. in het algemeen......................................................................................43 04.1.4 Wegen in het algemeen............................................................................................................45 04.2 Stukken betreffende bijzondere zaken............................................................................................45 04.2.1 Waterstaat.................................................................................................................................45 04.2.1.1 Friesland, Groningen en Drenthe......................................................................................45 04.2.1.2 Overijssel...........................................................................................................................45 04.2.1.3 Gelderland (en Duitsland).................................................................................................46 04.2.1.4 Utrecht..............................................................................................................................48 4 Inspecteurs Waterstaat vóór 1850 2.16.06 04.2.1.5 Noord-Holland..................................................................................................................49 04.2.1.6 Zuid-Holland......................................................................................................................51 04.2.1.6.1 Algemeen...................................................................................................................51 04.2.1.6.2 Rivierwerken..............................................................................................................53 04.2.1.6.3 Kanalen.....................................................................................................................54 04.2.1.6.4 Polders, droogmakerijen en veenderijen.................................................................55 04.2.1.6.5 Wegen en tollen........................................................................................................55 04.2.1.7 Zeeland..............................................................................................................................56 04.2.1.8 Noord-Brabant..................................................................................................................57 04.2.1.9 Limburg en Luik.................................................................................................................59 04.2.2 Miltaire zaken............................................................................................................................59 04.2.3 Uitvindingen enz.......................................................................................................................60 05 ADRIANUS FRANÇOIS GOUDRIAAN..........................................................................................61 05.1 Inspecteur-generaal...........................................................................................................................61 05.2 Inspecteur der 2e divisie...................................................................................................................62 05.3 Dossiers en bundels..........................................................................................................................62
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Tradition of Making Polder Citiesfransje HOOIMEIJER
    The Tradition of Making Polder CitiesFRANSJE HOOIMEIJER Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Technische Universiteit Delft, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. ir. K.C.A.M. Luyben, voorzitter van het College voor Promoties, in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 18 oktober 2011 om 12.30 uur door Fernande Lucretia HOOIMEIJER doctorandus in kunst- en cultuurwetenschappen geboren te Capelle aan den IJssel Dit proefschrift is goedgekeurd door de promotor: Prof. dr. ir. V.J. Meyer Copromotor: dr. ir. F.H.M. van de Ven Samenstelling promotiecommissie: Rector Magnificus, voorzitter Prof. dr. ir. V.J. Meyer, Technische Universiteit Delft, promotor dr. ir. F.H.M. van de Ven, Technische Universiteit Delft, copromotor Prof. ir. D.F. Sijmons, Technische Universiteit Delft Prof. ir. H.C. Bekkering, Technische Universiteit Delft Prof. dr. P.J.E.M. van Dam, Vrije Universiteit van Amsterdam Prof. dr. ir.-arch. P. Uyttenhove, Universiteit Gent, België Prof. dr. P. Viganò, Università IUAV di Venezia, Italië dr. ir. G.D. Geldof, Danish University of Technology, Denemarken For Juri, August*, Otis & Grietje-Nel 1 Inner City - Chapter 2 2 Waterstad - Chapter 3 3 Waterproject - Chapter 4 4 Blijdorp - Chapter 5a 5 Lage Land - Chapter 5b 6 Ommoord - Chapter 5b 7 Zevenkamp - Chapter 5c 8 Prinsenland - Chapter 5c 9 Nesselande - Chapter 6 10 Zestienhoven - Chapter 6 Content Chapter 1: Polder Cities 5 Introduction 5 Problem Statement, Hypothesis and Method 9 Technological Development as Natural Order 10 Building-Site Preparation 16 Rotterdam
    [Show full text]
  • Making Lifelines from Frontlines; 1
    The Rhine and European Security in the Long Nineteenth Century Throughout history rivers have always been a source of life and of conflict. This book investigates the Central Commission for the Navigation of the Rhine’s (CCNR) efforts to secure the principle of freedom of navigation on Europe’s prime river. The book explores how the most fundamental change in the history of international river governance arose from European security concerns. It examines how the CCNR functioned as an ongoing experiment in reconciling national and common interests that contributed to the emergence of Eur- opean prosperity in the course of the long nineteenth century. In so doing, it shows that modern conceptions and practices of security cannot be under- stood without accounting for prosperity considerations and prosperity poli- cies. Incorporating research from archives in Great Britain, Germany, and the Netherlands, as well as the recently opened CCNR archives in France, this study operationalises a truly transnational perspective that effectively opens the black box of the oldest and still existing international organisation in the world in its first centenary. In showing how security-prosperity considerations were a driving force in the unfolding of Europe’s prime river in the nineteenth century, it is of interest to scholars of politics and history, including the history of international rela- tions, European history, transnational history and the history of security, as well as those with an interest in current themes and debates about transboundary water governance. Joep Schenk is lecturer at the History of International Relations section at Utrecht University, Netherlands. He worked as a post-doctoral fellow within an ERC-funded project on the making of a security culture in Europe in the nineteenth century and is currently researching international environmental cooperation and competition in historical perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Radboud Repository PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/132951 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2017-12-05 and may be subject to change. ENVIRONMENTALISM, RENEWED CONCERN FOR FLOOD SAFETY, AND THE 8 EUROPEANIZATION OF DUTCH WATER POLICIES, 1970–2010 Wim van Leussen and Sander Meijerink s the title of this chapter suggests, three major by the construction of dikes were reconsidered, and Adevelopments characterize the contemporary new “room for the river” policies were introduced. history of Dutch water management: the environmental Furthermore, these latest flood policies were no longer wave, the renewed attention for flood safety strategies, confined to reducing flood probability, but also aimed and the Europeanization of Dutch water policies. The at reducing flood exposure and flood vulnerability— first development concerns the lasting influence of both strategies that the Dutch seem to have unlearned over the environmental wave and the democratization of the past century. To inform the public on these policy Dutch society in the 1960s and 1970s on Dutch water changes, the Dutch government at century’s end policies. As the increased environmental awareness launched a large-scale public campaign, informing induced a substantive change of water policies toward the people that they have to learn “to live with water” integrated water resources management based on a again.1 These new flood management strategies of water systems approach, the democratization process creating room for the river and raising water awareness, in Dutch society would have an impact on the process however, have not replaced the policies of reducing of decision making on new water policies and proj- flood probability by the construction of dikes.
    [Show full text]
  • Dames En Heren, Het Is Me Een Eer En Een Genoegen Om Vandaag Met
    Toespraak van de plaatsvervangend Diecteur-generaal Rijikswaterstaat, dhr Th. Van de Gazelle bij de oplevering van het gerestaureerde praalgraf van Christiaan Brunings en Frederik Conrad in de ST. Bavokerk te Haarlem op vrijdagavond 22 augustus 2014. Dames en heren, Het is me een eer en een genoegen om vandaag met u de oplevering van dit prachtig gerestaureerde monument te mogen vieren. Dit is bovendien een goed moment om de bijzondere verdiensten van Christiaan Brunings en Frederik Conrad weer eens onder de aandacht te brengen. Zij waren de grondleggers van Rijkswaterstaat en van de waterbeheersing van dit land. We staan er niet vaak bij stil, maar zonder dijken, dammen en stormvloedkeringen zou tweederde van ons land onder water staan. Nederlanders hebben hun land veroverd op het water. Weg- en waterbouwkundigen als Christiaan Brunings en Frederik Conrad hebben daar een doorslaggevende rol in gehad. Om dat te illustreren neem u graag mee naar de situatie van ons land aan het einde van de 18e eeuw. Nederland is in die tijd in crisis door grote waterstaatkundige problemen. De economie van ons land, die drijft op onze scheepvaart, raakt in het slop. De rivieren en havenmonden verzanden. Binnenvaartschepen kunnen niet langer aanmeren in de Hanzesteden. Ook de veiligheid van ons land is in het geding. De kust van ons land wordt steeds kwetsbaarder. De houten golfbrekers aan de buitenkant van de zeedijken raken kapot. Ze worden namelijk aangevreten door de verwoestende ‘paalworm’. Bovendien raken de kronkelende rivieren in ons land ‘s winters verstopt. In de bochten van de rivieren hopen zich gigantische hopen kruiend ijs op.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Strategies for Water Heritage Past, Present and Future Adaptive Strategies for Water Heritage Carola Hein Editor
    Carola Hein Editor Adaptive Strategies for Water Heritage Past, Present and Future Adaptive Strategies for Water Heritage Carola Hein Editor Adaptive Strategies for Water Heritage Past, Present and Future Editor Carola Hein Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment Technical University Delft Delft, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands ISBN 978-3-030-00267-1 ISBN 978-3-030-00268-8 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00268-8 Library of Congress Control Number: 2019934522 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and the Author(s) 2020. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc- nd/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this license to share adapted material derived from this book or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. This work is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • The Interaction of City and Water in the Yangtze River Delta, a Natural/Artificial Comparison with Euro Delta
    sustainability Article The Interaction of City and Water in the Yangtze River Delta, a Natural/Artificial Comparison with Euro Delta Yan Wang 1,2,*, Wei Dong 1 and Luuk Boelens 2 1 School of Architecture, Southeast University, 2 Sipailou, Nanjing 210096, China; [email protected] 2 Center for Mobility and Spatial Planning, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41 B2-1, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +86-25-8379-4579 Received: 20 September 2017; Accepted: 18 December 2017; Published: 8 January 2018 Abstract: Metropolitan deltas have much in common because of similar urban water management conditions. This paper will introduce the interaction of urban development and water management in and around the Yangtze River Delta from a historical perspective. It will compare the Yangtze River Delta with a short overview of the historic water urban developments in the Euro Delta. This paper will explore the importance of the variations of both delta areas, especially regarding the similarities and differences in urban morphology and delta governance. In conclusion, we will outline new challenges of resilient urban water management in both delta areas. Keywords: water urban history; Yangtze River Delta; Euro Delta; urban morphology; delta governance 1. Introduction The emergence of cities in world ancient civilizations is connected to large waterways. Civilizations needed water resources to settle down in one location, as rivers, lakes, and water pools were cradles for food. Canals and natural water streams were also used as defensive mechanisms. Later on, urban settlements prospered, as waterways allowed for trade and transport of goods and people, further spurring urban development [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 34 (2009) 119–131
    Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 34 (2009) 119–131 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Physics and Chemistry of the Earth journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pce The nation-state and the river: Spaces and times on Dutch rivers, 1795–1814 Cornelis Disco * University of Twente, Science, Technology, Health and Policy Studies, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, Netherlands article info abstract Article history: Nothing indeed demonstrates more forcefully the extent to which Dutch water management corresponds Received 13 November 2007 to the nature and the needs of the Dutch people and their land, and how it has emerged there from in a Received in revised form 17 June 2008 natural fashion than the fact that the revolutionaries of 1795, despite being so intoxicated by their unex- Accepted 27 June 2008 pected victory and sudden power that they overturned everything ... nonetheless refrained from laying Available online 9 July 2008 hands on institutions whose extreme antiquity would in those days have provided more of an excuse to abolish than to preserve them (J.W. Welcker, De Noorder-Lekdijk Bovendams en de doorsteking van den Keywords: Zuider-Lekdijk bij Culemborg 1803–1813. Een bijdrage tot de geschiedenis van den Nederlandschen Rivers Waterstaat geschetst en met onuitgegeven stukken toegelicht (‘s-Gravenhage: 1880), p. 2). State-formation Flood control Ó 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Commons Batavian Republic 1. Introduction The following day, January 16th, the intendant himself came to in- spect the dikes, and was received by the officers of the dike board.1 On the 13th of January, 1811, the officers of the Dike Board of This minor incident, turning on a mistaken presumption by the the Northern Lek Dike beneath the Dam installed themselves in officers of the dike board that they still had discretionary authority their headquarters at Jaarsveld near the middle of their 25 km long over disbanding their own dike army, illustrates both the persis- dike.
    [Show full text]
  • Hesselink, A.W. (2002). Oude Stroomsnelheidsmetingen in De
    Oude stroomsnelheids- m e tingen in de Rijntakken ANNIKA W. H ESSELI N K 'Verbaal van de proeven omtrent de snelheden der Boven-Rivieren, genoomen in de hierna gemel­ de Peilraaijen van de Oppervlakte tot op den Bodem der rivier, ten einde daar uit de gemiddelde snelheden te vinden, en door middel van deezen mitgaders van de vlakken Inhoud der Profilen de respective capaciteiten van gemelde Boven Rivieren te bepalen' (Brunings, 1790). De grote rivieren waren in de 18e eeuw in Ven, 1976). Als gevolg hiervan verzandden slechte staat: de afvoercapaciteit was te de Nederrijn en IJssel en nam de afvoerca­ klein, de dijken waren slecht onderhouden, paciteit af. Om de afvoerverdeling te verbe­ de afvoerverdeling van Rijn en Maas over de teren werd in 1707 het Pannerdensch zijtakken was niet stabiel en er waren te Kanaal gegraven. In 1771 werd besloten dat weinig riviermondingen. Dit resulteerde in de Waal voortaan 2/3 van het Rijnwater vele overstromingen. Om de veiligheid in moest afvoeren, de Nederrijn 2/9 en de IJs­ het rivierengebied te vergroten werden in sel 1/9. Om de afvoerverdeling aan het eind de 18e eeuw deze onvolkomenheden onder­ van de 18e eeuw te controleren ontwikkelde zocht. In 1730 werd een van de eerste waterstaatsingenieur Christiaan Brunings stroomsnelheidsmetingen uitgevoerd, om (1736-1805) in 1786 een stroomsnelheids- de afvoer van de Maas en de Waal te bepa­ meter1. len. Dit werd opnieuw gedaan in de Rijntak­ ken in 1790 en 1792. Aan de hand van deze BRUNINCS' STROOM SN ELH El DSM ETER gegevens werd het beleid ten aanzien van Brunings' stroomsnelheidsmeter bestond de grote rivieren vastgesteld en hoopte men uit een vierkante plaat (6 bij 6 Rhijnland- de slechte toestand van de rivieren te ver­ sche duim, dit is 16 bij 16 cm), die op ver­ beteren.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (4Mb)
    ...I J' I I/~·:~· I ,._ < , f' , [ ' . ' S~mmission of the European Communities; _Joint Research Centre- lspra Establishment 21020 lspra (Va)- Italy .. EURASEP PROJECT OCS EXPERIMENT 1977 Report No. 1 · DATA ACQUISITION B. Mriller Sorensen December 1977 I {'Ir/ 'j _,_ .' I CONTENTS 1. BACI<GROUND 1. l. :NIMBUS-G/CZCS/NET l, 2. EURASEP Project 1. 3. Pre -launch Activities 2. THE OCEAN COLOR SCANNER • 3. PREPARATION OF THE OCS CAMPAIGN 4. PRE-STAND-BY ACTIVITIES, JUNE 13- 19 4. 1. Installation of the Ocean Color Scanner 4. 2. Intercalibration of Sea Truth Instruments 4. 3. Information :CVIeeting with Sea Truth Teams 4. 4. Information Meeting with Atmospheric Measurement teams 4. 5. Test Flights and Sea Truth "Dummy Runs" 5. OCS SUPPORT FROM A MULTISPECTRAL SCANNER ON A MEDIUM ALTITUDE AIRCRAFT 6. PROJECT PLAN 6. 1. V/eather Forecasting 6. 2. Communication Center 6. 3. Aircrafts and Sensors 6. 3. 1. Mystere 20 Falcon Jet 6. 3. 2. Dornier 28 "Skyservant" 6. 3. 3. Cessna 402 6., 4 .. Sea Truth 6. 5. Atmospheric Measurements 6 .. 6. Vlate r Related Optical f>.Aeasurements 6. 7. Current Measurements 6. C. Meteorological Records 7. THE OCS EXPERIMENT JUNE 19- JULY 3 D. ASSESSMENT OF THE PLANNING, COORDINATION AND EXECUTION OF THE OCS EXPERIMENT S. l. Sea Truth B. 2. Flights 8. 3. Atmospheric Measurements • 9. DOCUMENTATION 10. DATA ARCHIVATION AND DATA ANALYSIS PLAN 11. ACI<.NOW LEDGEMENT APPENDICES EUR/C-IS/31/78. e II LIST OF FIGURES Figure l Test site with flight and ship tracks Figure 2 Floating intake Figure 3 Scheme for on-board continuous surface sampling Figure.4 Test site with atmospheric measurement stations Figure 5 Test site with alternative flight plan for Mystere LIST OF TABLES Table l Comparison of the characteristics of the OCS with those of two conventional scanners Table 2 The vessels and their tracks EUR/C-IS/31 /78.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison Between Regions in China and Europe, C. 1400–
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by DSpace at VU Journal of Global History (2006) 1, pp 59–79 ª London School of Economics and Political Science 2006 doi:10.1017/S1740022806000040 River control and the evolution of knowledge: a comparison between regions in China and Europe, c. 1400–18501 Karel Davids Afdeling Geschiedenis, Faculteit der Letteren, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] Abstract This article examines the similarities and divergences in the evolution of knowledge con- cerning river control in China and Europe, between about 1400 and 1850. The analysis con- centrates on four densely populated and relatively prosperous regions, which were faced with comparable problems caused by unruly rivers: the coastal plains of the Yellow River, the basin of the middle Yangzi, the coastal area of Northern Italy, and the Rhine delta in the Netherlands. During the period under discussion, Northern Italy was the first region to witness a ‘cognitive leap’ in knowledge of river hydraulics. The author analyses why this particular transformation in the body of knowledge took place in Northern Italy, rather than in any of the regions in China. He also examines why the Netherlands, in contrast to regions in China, offered a receptive environment to this new approach in river hydraulics from c. 1770. He suggests that differences in the development of knowledge can be explained primarily in terms of underlying socio-political structures. Introduction ‘Since European rivers presented few serious control problems, European interest [in hydraulic works], when eventually it arose, centred mainly on transport canals’, Joseph Needham many years ago claimed in his magisterial Science and civilisation in China.2 1 An earlier version of this essay was presented at the Global Economic History Network Conference in the Netherlands Institute of Advanced Studies, Wassenaar, The Netherlands, September 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • River Management and the Evolution of Knowledge in China, Northern Italy and the Netherlands Karel Davids
    Water control and useful knowledge: river management and the evolution of knowledge in China, Northern Italy and the Netherlands Karel Davids Introduction ‘Since European rivers presented few serious control problems, European interest [ in hydraulic works ], when eventually it arose, centred mainly on transport canals’, Joseph Needham many years ago claimed in his magisterial Science and civilisation in China. 1 In contrast with China, European countries apparently developed no particular interest, or competence, in the management of water flows in rivers. Anyone who has kept up with the news of the last ten years or so knows that Needham’s remark was in fact rather optimistic, to say the least. European rivers nowadays do present serious control problems and, the historian may add, they did so in the past as well. Problems of water control, and their solutions, in Europe differed less from those in China than a casual glance might suggest. The history of water control offers a rich field for challenging comparisons between Europa and China. This paper will look from a Chinese perspective at river management in Europe. The importance in Chinese history of the problem of controlling the Yellow River is, thanks to the work by Needham, Flessel, Elvin. Dodgen and others2, quite well-known. Comparable problems arose in regions in Europe, notably the coastal 11 Needham, Joseph, with Wang Ling and Lu Gwei-djen, Science and civilization in China, vol.4.III, Civil engineering and nautics (Cambridge 1971) , 376; Needham was nevertheless aware of the emergence of what he calls `post-Renaissance mathematical hydrodynamics’, see footnote d on p.231.
    [Show full text]
  • Bekijk Deze Editie (Pdf)
    ^BORNEO dabo ml X «""•, <t& *V ƒ.•?;••;.:.. àdayn a calapa CAERT-THRESOOR TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR DE GESCHIEDENIS VAN DE KARTOGRAFIE IN NEDERLAND 15e jaargang 1996, nr. 2 w^pjTmmaaiu^ -Paccm a* *"••* C2^ ß rt/W îem fÊj\imtaok CAERT-THRESOOR Inhoud 15e jaargang 1996, nr. 2 Antiquariaat •"»novi^ Het Bisschopshof De Nederlandse bijdrage aan de decoratieve kartografische titelpagina Rodney Shirley 29 '. .het Skelet van de nieuwe Caart der Republiek. .', de kostbare voorgeschiedenis van de Krayenhoff-kaart Oude Boeken, Prenten René M. Haubourdin 38 en Kaarten Varia Cartographica 47 Besprekingen 51 J.W. Kervezee Nieuwe Literatuur en Facsimile-uitgaven 53 Lichte Gaard 1 3511 KT Utrecht 030-2314093 Nederlandse stads- en dorpsgezichten Kaarten en plattegronden Plaatsbeschrijvingen en atlassen Redactie Dr. H.P. Deys, Drs. M.M.Th.L. Hameleers, Geïllustreerde boeken Dr. P.C.J. van der Krogt, Drs. A.H. Ruitinga, J.W.F. Voogt, Drs. D. de Vries Drs. J.W.H. Werner Redactiesecretariaat Kopij, recensie-exemplaren enz. zenden aan: Caert-Thresoor, dhr. J.W.F. Voogt, Universiteit Utrecht, FRW-Vakgr. Kartografie, Postbus 80.115, 3508 TC Utrecht. Aanwijzingen voor auteurs Op aanvraag verkrijgbaar bij het redactiesecretariaat. Abonnementen en administratie Abonnementen (alleen per hele jaargang) ƒ 32,50 per jaar (vier nummers), buitenland ƒ 55, — . Losse nummers ƒ 12,50. Opgave van abonnementen, adreswijzigingen en bestellingen van losse nummers aan: Caert-Thresoor, Postbus 68, 2400 AB Alphen aan den Rijn, tel. 0172- 444667, Postgironummer 5253901. Copyright Het overnemen of vermenigvuldigen van artikelen is slechts geoorloof d na schriftelijke toestemming van de re- dactie Advertentietarieven hele pagina per nr. ƒ 110,— halve pagina per nr.
    [Show full text]