The Inevitable Pak-Afghan Union ICSSA Occasional Paper
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
1 The inevitable Pak-Afghan Union ICSSA Occasional Paper Abid Ullah Jan The paper assesses Pak-Afghan future in the light of history, culture and the ongoing situation on the ground. 2 Contents History 4 Early history 4 Muslim conquests 5 Beginning of the international problem 6 The indivisible people and land 8 Recent border tensions 10 Talks of division 12 Greater Afghanistan 12 Footnotes 15 Annexure 17 3 The Inevitable Pak-Afghan Union. The paper is based on arguments in the light of history and current realities, which shows that Union of Pakistan and Afghanistan is necessary, inevitable and possible. Any reference to religion has been purposely avoided to keep it understandable. When analysed from the religious point of view, there are authentic sayings of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), which show that there would be a strong government towards the Eastern side of Arab Peninsula, which will play a leading role in Islamic revival. The continued struggle in Afghanistan, the unflinching determination of both Afghans and Pakistanis never to live under occupation and the military strength that Pakistan has acquired are some of the indications towards realisation of Prophet Muhammad’s (PBUH) prophesies and the establishment of Greater Afghanistan. The US and its allies occupy both Afghanistan and forces advocating South Asian regional cooperation (even Pakistan. The only difference is that the former is under Pakistan’s reunion with India) are the forces acting for the direct military occupation as a result of full-scale war disintegration of Pakistan. There are also plans under con- waged against its former government. Pakistan, on the sideration since long for dividing Afghanistan into differ- other hand, suffers from partial occupation. Unlike Hamid ent states to neutralise any prospects of its emergence as Karzai, the US forces have not waged a war to install an “Islamic fundamentalist” state. Pakistan and General Musharraf. Nevertheless, compared to Afghani- Afghanistan’s future security and survival as viable states stan, the US can achieve its objectives more freely and is self-evident in none of these propositions. Interestingly, conveniently in Pakistan. Along these full and partial oc- all efforts made towards disintegrating these states are in- cupations, natural resources, strategic positions, Pakistan’s directly leading to the realisation of most plausible secu- nuclear capability and various other factors within and rity alternative: the union of Pakistan and Afghanistan. Whatever may be outside Pakistan and Afghanistan are pushing these coun- They strengthen the invisible forces of trans-pseudo-na- the outcome, one tries are at work to somehow alter their present status. tional religious and cultural identity which are leading Whatever may be the outcome, one can safely say these countries towards the inevitable union. can safely say that that Pakistan and Afghanistan will not remain as two states In Pakistan, there are two clear ends of the spectrum. Pakistan and on the world map for too long. Almost all the visible forces At one end, visionaries like Dr. Israr Ahmed of Tanzeem- Afghanistan will are engaged in somehow disintegrating these states. The i-Islami foresee confederation between Pakistan and Af- invisible forces, nevertheless, are brining these countries ghanistan for countering Indian and other hegemonic not remain as two towards an ultimate unification — towards the forma- designs.1 On the other end, the self-proclaimed “liberals” states on the tion of a greater Afghanistan. A thorough analysis reveals like Najam Sethi come up with inflammatory and scare- world map for too that results of the visible forces, working for disintegrat- mongering articles and editorials. For example a Febru- ing these states, would also indirectly lead to strengthen ary 02, 2001 editorial of the Friday Times shows how much long. position of the forces invisibly leading these states towards deep contempt some quarters have for the North-West unification. Frontier Province (NWFP), Pakhtoons and Afghans. The The disintegration options are presented as the best idea of a multi-ethnic, multi-sectarian and democratic security option for the region. A broad identification in Pakistan seems to exclude the inhabitants of NWFP. By this regard shows the forces for domestic liberalization making disparaging remarks about Pakhtoons, the edito- (demilitarising, democratising, or “secularising”) and the rial is an example of how the forces of disintegration are 4 Durability of Pakistan borders are constantly questioned by Indian and western analysts with a hope to see a disintegrated Pakistan. At the moment, ethnic separatism actually not only promoting sectarianism, hatred, intol- History is not a significant threat in the erance and xenophobia but also paving the way for unifi- NWFP, where the Pakhtunistan cation of Pakistan and Afghanistan. movement is mostly moribund In an article published in Asian Affairs, an American Early History It is probable that there were well-developed civili- and, beyond that, tends to be seen Review, Washington October 1995, Sandy Gordon argued that at the end of the Cold War, India had emerged as the zations in Afghanistan in prehistoric times, but the ar- less as a product of grievances of winner and Pakistan the loser in South Asia. “Far from chaeological record is not clear. Certainly cultures had Pakhtoons than as a device having lost out as a result of the end of the Cold War,” he flourished in the north and east before the Persian king exploited and fostered at times by wrote, India is poised to emerge in the early 21st century Darius I (c.500 B.C.) conquered these areas. Later, external forces. as a far more important and influential power in the In- Alexander the Great conquered (329–327 B.C.) them on dian Ocean region, and even globally, than it was in the his way to India, which never included the present land latter part of the 20th.2 Pro-India transmissions of BBC area of Pakistan. World Service abroad and rhetoric of pro-India “peace After Alexander’s death (323 B.C.) the region at first lobby’ together with anti-religious organisation campaign was part of the Seleucid empire. In the north, Bactria in Pakistan indicate the pace of uncontrollable events that became independent, and the south was acquired by the are soon going to push the pendulum towards the inevi- Maurya dynasty. Bactria expanded southward but fell table unification. (mid-2d cent. B.C.) to the Parthians and rebellious tribes Durability of Pakistan borders are constantly ques- (notably the Saka). Buddhism was introduced from the tioned by Indian and western analysts with a hope to see east by the Yüechi, who founded the Kushan dynasty (early a disintegrated Pakistan. At home, media outlets like Fri- 2d cent. B.C.). Their capital was Peshawar. The Kushans day Times use the acronym, ‘NWFP’ throughout specific declined (3d cent. A.D.) and were supplanted by the pieces of articles and editorials in a way to relegate a con- Sassanids, the Ephthalites, and the Turkish Tu-Kuie. stituent unit of the Pak Nation. Perhaps in their vision of a multi-ethnic, multi-sectarian and democratic Pakistan, Muslim conquests Eastern Flank of Islam under the Four Rightly the ‘NWFP’ will merely be an appendage i.e. a buffer Guided Caliphs Islam spread to the borders of Afghani- zone to protect a multi-ethnic, multi-sectarian and demo- stan under Caliph Othman (644-656) and Caliph Ali cratic Pakistan from their co-religionists in Afghanistan. (656-661). Under the Umayyads (661-750), Islam spread At the moment, ethnic separatism is not a signifi- to Afghanistan: Kabul (664), Punjab, Sindh and Central cant threat in the NWFP, where the Pakhtunistan move- Asia: Transoxania, Merv (710), Samarkand (710). In 711 ment is mostly moribund and, beyond that, tends to be C.E., Muhmmad Bin Qasim under command of the ruler At the same time, Pakhtoons seen less as a product of grievances of Pakhtoons than as a of Spain and Central Asia came into South Asia reaching nationalism is by no means a device exploited and fostered at times by external forces. EMPIRE OF MAHMOOD GHAZNI thing of the past, however, and At the same time, Pakhtoons nationalism is by no means seems bound to become more a thing of the past, however, and seems bound to be- troublesome with Pakhtoon and come more troublesome with Pakhtoon and non- Pakhtoon struggle in Afghanistan on the one hand and non-Pakhtoon struggle in irresponsible attitude of the “liberal” leaders and media Afghanistan on the one hand and pundits in Pakistan on the other. The new version of this irresponsible attitude of the movement, nevertheless, would be in favour of confed- “liberal” leaders and media eration with Afghanistan rather than dismemberment of pundits in Pakistan on the other. Pakistan. The new version of this This paper looks into various aspects that are lead- movement, nevertheless, would be ing Pakistan and Afghanistan to end up as a united coun- in favour of confederation with try. Afghanistan rather than dismemberment of Pakistan. 5 This paper looks into various aspects that are leading Pakistan and Af- ghanistan to end up as a united country. as far as Multan, where he settled 4000 Arab families. 1526) with its capital in Delhi, followed under the lead- The Muslim The Muslim conquest of Afghanistan began in the ership of four major dynasties - the Mamluks (Turkish conquest of Af- 7th century. Several short-lived Muslim dynasties were slaves), Khaljis, Tughlaqs and Lodis.6 During this time founded, the most powerful of them having its capital at there was an intermixing of Turkish, Persian and Afghan ghanistan began Ghazni. Mehmud Gahnavi, who conquered the lands culture, for example the word Urdu is of Turkish origin in the 7th cen- from Khorasan in Iran to the Punjab in India early in the meaning military camp.