Address: Checklist Completed By: Date Completed

ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST

Client: Type of Property: Free standing house Unit/Flat/Apartment Villa Semi Granny Flat Other

Address: Checklist completed by: Date Completed:

Problematic/Offending Behaviour/s: Clients target group:

CJS INFLUENCES FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS factor Court Imposed restrictions/requireme nts.

TYPE OF FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS ACCOMM Factor Client Preferences

Free Standing House Proximity to neighbours. Fence height. Neighbour visibility

Potential to secrete or entice children. (eg. Large yard/garden, hidden areas, shortcut potential)

Internal layout potential to secrete people or objects.

1 June 2006 TYPE OF FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS ACCOMM Factor Free standing house Internal layout impact cont. on supervision. Open plan v’s small pokey rooms

Internal layout impact on implementation of reactive strategies. Open plan v’s small pokey rooms.

Views from each window & entry doors.

Garage/shed (potential to secrete items/people or view others from)

Unit Flat/Apartment, Proximity to Granny Flat neighbours. Fence height. Neighbour visibility

Potential to secrete or entice children. (eg. Large yard/garden, hidden areas, shortcut potential)

Internal layout impact on supervision. Open plan v’s small pokey rooms.

2 June 2006 TYPE OF FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS ACCOMM Factor Unit/Flat/Apartment, Internal layout impact granny flat cont. on implementation of reactive strategies. Open plan v’s small pokey rooms.

Common areas. Eg. Laundries, back yards

Villa/Semi Proximity to neighbours. Fence height. Neighbour visibility.

Potential to secrete or entice children. (eg, large yard/garden, hidden areas, shortcut potential)

Internal layout impact on supervision. Open plan v’s small pokey rooms.

3 June 2006 TYPE OF FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS ACCOMM Factor Villa/Semi cont. Internal layout impact on implementation of reactive strategies. Open plan v’s small pokey rooms.

Common areas, eg. Laundries, backyards.

LOCATION OF PRESENT IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENT ACCOMM RE: OR x Factor Client Preferences

Schools, child care centres.

Shopping centres, corner shops

Public phones

Playgrounds, parks

4 June 2006 LOCATION OF PRESENT IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENT ACCOMM RE:  OR x Factor Libraries/community halls.

Public toilets

Bus stops

Railway stations

Family restaurants/takeaways

Cinemas, theatres

Leisure options for families. Eg public pools, churches, etc

Laneways, shortcuts near by children likely to use.

Do neighbours have children living with them?

Visibility of neighbours from different areas within the house.

5 June 2006 LOCATION OF PRESENT IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENT ACCOMM RE:  OR x Factor Do children regularly door knock in the area?

Street lighting

CO-RESIDENTS FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS Factor Client Preferences

Will they be sharing the accomm with others? Y / N Gender of other residents. M =

F = Age of other residents Are they younger/older/same age?

Do they look/act younger/older than their age?

Vulnerability Do they have any physical disabilities?

Physical characteristics that might make them vulnerable/attractive to offender. 6 June 2006 CO-RESIDENTS FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS Factor Vulnerability cont. Skill deficits that may contribute. (eg communication, personal boundaries, promiscuity)

Co-residents community Will/do they have connections family/friends visiting that may be a potential target?

Will other members of the community be visiting the house who could be potential targets?

Do any of the co- Sexual residents have any type of offending behaviours?

Do any of the co- In house (eg TV residents have interests shows, magazines, that may not be in the DVDs) offender’s best interest?

Outside of house activities that may/would allow access to offenders target group, eg bowling, swimming

Any other characteristics of co-residents that may increase risk for the offender or make risk management more difficult. Eg. Challenging behaviour? 7 June 2006 CO-RESIDENTS FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS Factor Do any of the co- residents have support needs that may conflict with being able to implement strategies/protocols to manage risks for the offender? Eg medical, behavioural Internal layout of Potential to property compromise additional supervision requirements.

Potential for co- residents to collude or become a victim. Eg. Only one bathroom

REGULAR FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS COMMITMENTS/R Factor OUTINE REQUIREMENTS Client Preferences

Will the client need to use public transport for either leisure or routine commitments?

8 June 2006 REGULAR FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS COMMITMENTS/R Factor OUTINE REQUIREMENTS Potential to come in Do their target group contact with target group use this mode/s?

Travel times

Destinations

Supervision during travel, departure & arrival.

Will the client be walking Travel times as primary mode of transport?

Destinations

Will their mode of Eg. Bus route, train transport bring them into station, walking route regular contact with any of the places in the location section?

Will the clients leisure Type of activity &/or regular commitment bring them into contact with target group via

9 June 2006 REGULAR FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS COMMITMENTS/R Factor OUTINE REQUIREMENTS Will the clients leisure Time of activity &/or regular commitment bring them into contact with target group via

Travel to/from activity

Proximity of activity to other venues target group may use.

Supervision arrangements for activity

Whilst in the community will client have access to shopping to obtain inappropriate materials or stimuli?

If drugs/alcohol an issue will community access provide opportunity to access them?

Preparation before community access (list tasks such as toileting, verbal prompts, revision of strategies)

10 June 2006 REGULAR FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS COMMITMENTS/R Factor OUTINE REQUIREMENTS Post community access strategies to support client.

Have strategies been developed to address crisis situations?

Have staff been briefed/trained in them?

SOCIAL FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS NETWORKS Factor Client Preferences

Opportunities for the client to access friends or acquaintances who participate in high risk behaviours or have attitudes that condone offending behaviour.

Access to friends or family that are unaware of client’s risk factors or have attitudes that condone offending behaviours.

11 June 2006 STAFFING/SUPER FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS VISION Factor Client Preferences

Support hours per day.

Support hours per week.

Will there be a waking night shift?

Activities requiring special or additional support.

Mix of male/female staff

Staff & their families discussion Photos Phone calls

Do any staff have similar characteristics to target group? Eg. Physical, personal

Have staff attitudes to sex offenders been considered/addressed?

Staff briefing on appropriate attire.

12 June 2006 STAFFING/SUPER FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS VISION Factor Formal communication Direct care staff. channels/protocols established between;

Direct care staff & management.

Direct care staff & other service providers Eg. Reporting for sex (eg police, parole offender register officers)

Direct care staff &/or management & families.

Staff supervision strategies/procedures established.

Staff training strategies/procedures established.

ACCESS TO FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS MATERIALS Factor Mail delivery & access to inappropriate material via mail.

TV/video/DVD

13 June 2006 ACCESS TO FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS MATERIALS Factor Other media (includes Cameras, binoculars, content, viewing times, telescopes etc etc) cont

Computer/internet

Mobile phones

Magazines/newspaper

Gaming devices (eg Playstation, Nintendo)

Product packaging

Access to other forms of pornography

Items which may be used to groom target group or their carers.

14 June 2006 OTHER ISSUES FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS TO CONSIDER Factor

15 June 2006