<p> ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST</p><p>Client: Type of Property: Free standing house Unit/Flat/Apartment Villa Semi Granny Flat Other</p><p>Address: Checklist completed by: Date Completed: </p><p>Problematic/Offending Behaviour/s: Clients target group: </p><p>CJS INFLUENCES FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS factor Court Imposed restrictions/requireme nts.</p><p>Other </p><p>TYPE OF FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS ACCOMM Factor Client Preferences </p><p>Free Standing House Proximity to neighbours. Fence height. Neighbour visibility</p><p>Potential to secrete or entice children. (eg. Large yard/garden, hidden areas, shortcut potential)</p><p>Internal layout potential to secrete people or objects.</p><p>1 June 2006 TYPE OF FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS ACCOMM Factor Free standing house Internal layout impact cont. on supervision. Open plan v’s small pokey rooms</p><p>Internal layout impact on implementation of reactive strategies. Open plan v’s small pokey rooms.</p><p>Views from each window & entry doors.</p><p>Garage/shed (potential to secrete items/people or view others from)</p><p>Other </p><p>Unit Flat/Apartment, Proximity to Granny Flat neighbours. Fence height. Neighbour visibility</p><p>Potential to secrete or entice children. (eg. Large yard/garden, hidden areas, shortcut potential)</p><p>Internal layout potential to secrete people or objects.</p><p>Internal layout impact on supervision. Open plan v’s small pokey rooms.</p><p>2 June 2006 TYPE OF FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS ACCOMM Factor Unit/Flat/Apartment, Internal layout impact granny flat cont. on implementation of reactive strategies. Open plan v’s small pokey rooms.</p><p>Views from each window & entry doors.</p><p>Common areas. Eg. Laundries, back yards</p><p>Other </p><p>Villa/Semi Proximity to neighbours. Fence height. Neighbour visibility.</p><p>Potential to secrete or entice children. (eg, large yard/garden, hidden areas, shortcut potential)</p><p>Internal layout potential to secrete people or objects.</p><p>Internal layout impact on supervision. Open plan v’s small pokey rooms.</p><p>3 June 2006 TYPE OF FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS ACCOMM Factor Villa/Semi cont. Internal layout impact on implementation of reactive strategies. Open plan v’s small pokey rooms.</p><p>Views from each window & entry doors.</p><p>Common areas, eg. Laundries, backyards.</p><p>Other </p><p>LOCATION OF PRESENT IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENT ACCOMM RE: OR x Factor Client Preferences </p><p>Schools, child care centres.</p><p>Shopping centres, corner shops</p><p>Public phones </p><p>Playgrounds, parks </p><p>4 June 2006 LOCATION OF PRESENT IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENT ACCOMM RE:  OR x Factor Libraries/community halls.</p><p>Public toilets </p><p>Bus stops </p><p>Railway stations </p><p>Family restaurants/takeaways</p><p>Cinemas, theatres </p><p>Leisure options for families. Eg public pools, churches, etc</p><p>Laneways, shortcuts near by children likely to use.</p><p>Do neighbours have children living with them?</p><p>Visibility of neighbours from different areas within the house.</p><p>5 June 2006 LOCATION OF PRESENT IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENT ACCOMM RE:  OR x Factor Do children regularly door knock in the area?</p><p>Street lighting </p><p>Other </p><p>CO-RESIDENTS FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS Factor Client Preferences </p><p>Will they be sharing the accomm with others? Y / N Gender of other residents. M = </p><p>F = Age of other residents Are they younger/older/same age?</p><p>Do they look/act younger/older than their age?</p><p>Vulnerability Do they have any physical disabilities?</p><p>Physical characteristics that might make them vulnerable/attractive to offender. 6 June 2006 CO-RESIDENTS FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS Factor Vulnerability cont. Skill deficits that may contribute. (eg communication, personal boundaries, promiscuity)</p><p>Co-residents community Will/do they have connections family/friends visiting that may be a potential target?</p><p>Will other members of the community be visiting the house who could be potential targets?</p><p>Do any of the co- Sexual residents have any type of offending behaviours?</p><p>Other </p><p>Do any of the co- In house (eg TV residents have interests shows, magazines, that may not be in the DVDs) offender’s best interest?</p><p>Outside of house activities that may/would allow access to offenders target group, eg bowling, swimming</p><p>Any other characteristics of co-residents that may increase risk for the offender or make risk management more difficult. Eg. Challenging behaviour? 7 June 2006 CO-RESIDENTS FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS Factor Do any of the co- residents have support needs that may conflict with being able to implement strategies/protocols to manage risks for the offender? Eg medical, behavioural Internal layout of Potential to property compromise additional supervision requirements.</p><p>Potential for co- residents to collude or become a victim. Eg. Only one bathroom</p><p>Other </p><p>REGULAR FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS COMMITMENTS/R Factor OUTINE REQUIREMENTS Client Preferences </p><p>Will the client need to use public transport for either leisure or routine commitments?</p><p>8 June 2006 REGULAR FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS COMMITMENTS/R Factor OUTINE REQUIREMENTS Potential to come in Do their target group contact with target group use this mode/s?</p><p>Travel times </p><p>Destinations </p><p>Supervision during travel, departure & arrival.</p><p>Will the client be walking Travel times as primary mode of transport?</p><p>Destinations </p><p>Will their mode of Eg. Bus route, train transport bring them into station, walking route regular contact with any of the places in the location section?</p><p>Will the clients leisure Type of activity &/or regular commitment bring them into contact with target group via </p><p>9 June 2006 REGULAR FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS COMMITMENTS/R Factor OUTINE REQUIREMENTS Will the clients leisure Time of activity &/or regular commitment bring them into contact with target group via </p><p>Travel to/from activity </p><p>Proximity of activity to other venues target group may use.</p><p>Supervision arrangements for activity</p><p>Whilst in the community will client have access to shopping to obtain inappropriate materials or stimuli?</p><p>If drugs/alcohol an issue will community access provide opportunity to access them?</p><p>Preparation before community access (list tasks such as toileting, verbal prompts, revision of strategies)</p><p>10 June 2006 REGULAR FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS COMMITMENTS/R Factor OUTINE REQUIREMENTS Post community access strategies to support client.</p><p>Have strategies been developed to address crisis situations?</p><p>Have staff been briefed/trained in them?</p><p>SOCIAL FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS NETWORKS Factor Client Preferences </p><p>Opportunities for the client to access friends or acquaintances who participate in high risk behaviours or have attitudes that condone offending behaviour.</p><p>Access to friends or family that are unaware of client’s risk factors or have attitudes that condone offending behaviours.</p><p>Other </p><p>11 June 2006 STAFFING/SUPER FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS VISION Factor Client Preferences </p><p>Support hours per day. </p><p>Support hours per week. </p><p>Will there be a waking night shift?</p><p>Activities requiring special or additional support.</p><p>Mix of male/female staff </p><p>Staff & their families discussion Photos Phone calls</p><p>Do any staff have similar characteristics to target group? Eg. Physical, personal</p><p>Have staff attitudes to sex offenders been considered/addressed?</p><p>Staff briefing on appropriate attire.</p><p>12 June 2006 STAFFING/SUPER FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS VISION Factor Formal communication Direct care staff. channels/protocols established between;</p><p>Direct care staff & management.</p><p>Direct care staff & other service providers Eg. Reporting for sex (eg police, parole offender register officers)</p><p>Direct care staff &/or management & families.</p><p>Staff supervision strategies/procedures established.</p><p>Staff training strategies/procedures established.</p><p>Other </p><p>ACCESS TO FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS MATERIALS Factor Mail delivery & access to inappropriate material via mail.</p><p>TV/video/DVD </p><p>13 June 2006 ACCESS TO FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS MATERIALS Factor Other media (includes Cameras, binoculars, content, viewing times, telescopes etc etc) cont </p><p>Computer/internet </p><p>Mobile phones </p><p>Magazines/newspaper </p><p>Gaming devices (eg Playstation, Nintendo)</p><p>Product packaging </p><p>Access to other forms of pornography</p><p>Items which may be used to groom target group or their carers.</p><p>Other </p><p>14 June 2006 OTHER ISSUES FACTORS IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK (+/-) Key PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/COMMENTS TO CONSIDER Factor</p><p>15 June 2006</p>