DOCSLIB.ORG

Development and Flight Test Experiences with a Flight-Crucial Digital Control System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Development and Flight Test Experiences with a Flight-Crucial Digital Control System NASA Technical Paper 2857 1 1988 Development and Flight Test Experiences With a Flight-Crucial Digital Control System Dale A. Mackall Ames Research Center Dryden Flight Research Facility Edwards, Calgornia I National Aeronautics I and Space Administration I Scientific and Technical Information Division I CONTENTS Page ~ SUMMARY ................................... 1 I 1 INTRODUCTION . 1 2 NOMENCLATURE . 2 3 SYSTEM SPECIFICATION . 5 3.1 Control Laws and Handling Qualities ................. 5 3.2 Reliability and Fault Tolerance ................... 5 4 DESIGN .................................. 6 4.1 System Architecture and Fault Tolerance ............... 6 4.1.1 Digital flight control system architecture .......... 6 4.1.2 Digital flight control system computer hardware ........ 8 4.1.3 Avionics interface ...................... 8 4.1.4 Pilot interface ........................ 9 4.1.5 Actuator interface ...................... 10 4.1.6 Electrical system interface .................. 11 4.1.7 Selector monitor and failure manager ............. 12 4.1.8 Built-in test and memory mode ................. 14 4.2 ControlLaws ............................. 15 4.2.1 Control law development process ................ 15 4.2.2 Control law design ...................... 15 4.3 Digital Flight Control System Software ................ 17 4.3.1 Software development process ................. 18 4.3.2 Software design ........................ 19 5 SYSTEM-SOFTWARE QUALIFICATION AND DESIGN ITERATIONS ............ 19 5.1 Schedule ............................... 20 5.2 Software Verification ........................ 21 5.2.1 Verification test plan .................... 21 5.2.2 Verification support equipment . ................ 22 5.2.3 Verification tests ...................... 22 5.2.4 Reverifying the design iterations ............... 24 5.3 System Validation .......................... 24 5.3.1 Validation test plan . ............... 24 5.3.2 Support equipment ....................... 25 5.3.3 Validation tests ....................... 25 5.3.4 Revalidation of designs .................... 33 5.4 Qualification Issues ......................... 33 6 CONFIGURATION CONTROL . 33 17 FLIGHTTEST ................................ 34 I 7.1 General ............................... 35 1 7.2 Fault-Tolerant Design ........................ 37 I 7.2.1 In-flight experience ..................... 37 7.2.2 Ground experience ....................... 39 7.2.3 Summary ............................ 40 I 7.3 Control Laws ............................. 41 I iii i PRECEDING PAGE BLANK NOT FILMED 7.4 Hardware ............................... 42 7.5 Software ............................... 43 8 OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . 44 8.1 Anomaly of Flight 44, A Case Study .................. 44 8.1.1 Specifcation ......................... 44 8.1.2 Design ............................ 45 8.1.3 Qualification ......................... 45 8.2 Observations and Recommendations by development Phase .......................... 45 8.2.1 Specification ......................... 45 8.2.2 Design ............................ 46 8.2.3 Qualification ......................... 47 8.2.4 Flight test .......................... 48 9 CONCLUDINGREMARKS . 49 APPENDIX -CONTROL LAW VERIFICATION REQUIREMENTS 50 iv SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION Engineers and scientists in the advanced The advanced fighter technology integra- fighter technology integration (AFTI) tion (AFT11 F-16 program provided the F-16 program investigated the integra- opportunity to investigate the bene- tion of emerging technologies into an fits and complexities of integrating advanced fighter aircraft. AFTI'S three advanced aircraft technologies into a major technologies included (1 ) flight- fighter aircraft. The study was a crucial digital control, (2) decoupled joint National Aeronautics and Space aircraft flight control, and (3) inte- Administration (NASA), U.S. Air Force, gration of avionics, flight control, and and U.S. Navy program and was managed pilot displays. In addition to investi- by the Air Force Flight Dynamics Labo- gating improvements in fighter perform- ratory. NASA goals were to ensure ance, researchers studied the generic safety during flight testing and to problems confronting the designers of provide an independent assessment of highly integrated f light-crucial digital the advanced technologies. control systems. The primary subject of this report The author provides an overview of is the digital flight control system both the advantages and problems of in- (DFCS) and its integration with the tegrated digital control systems. An avionics and pilot displays. An intro- examination of the specification, de- duction to the history, rationale, and sign, qualification, and flight test nomenclature of digital flight control life-cycle phase is provided. An over- systems can be found in Szalai (1978). view is given of the fault-tolerant The AFTI F-16 DFCS development objec- design, multimoded decoupled flight tives included assessment of a triplex control laws, and integrated avionics dual-fail operate architecture, integra- design. The approach to qualifying the tion of avionics and pilot displays with software and system designs is discussed, the DFCS, and development of mission- and the effects of design choices on specific decoupled flight control modes. system qualification are highlighted. Operating a DFCS without mission AFTI F-16 flight test results are impairment after any two failures summarized for the fault-tolerant, de- required a minimum of four channels of coupled flight control, hardware, and redundancy in previously designed sys- software requirements. The effects of tems. If a triplex system could cor- design choices and qualification proce- rectly choose between the remaining dures on flight test operations are de- two channels when the second failure tailed, based on AFTI flight experience. occurred, acquisition and maintenance costs for the flight control system Observations and recommendations are could be reduced. Reducing pilot work- given for each development phase - speci- load and increasing weapon effectiveness fication, design, qualification, and were the goals of integrating the DFCS flight test. and its mission-specific decoupled con- trol modes with the avionics system and pilot displays. In previously designed A/S airspeed systems, the flight controls did not have specific modes for the different ASB air-to-surface bombing missions. The pilot was required to individually configure each avionic ASG air-to-surface gunnery system for a mission. ATP acceptance test procedure This report includes an historical review of the development and flight lateral acceleration, ft/sec2 test of this integrated DFCS program. AY The historical review is structured to ac alternating current provide an adequate background of the development process and the resulting alpha angle of attack, deg design needed to comprehend the flight test results. The author addresses each an normal acceleration, ft/sec2 of the development phases - specifica- tion, design, qualification, and flight BIT built-in test test. Important lessons learned are illustrated with examples from flight beta angle of sideslip, deg test experience. CADC central air data computer The increasing use of system integration to increase aircraft ccv control configured vehicle performance, and the flight crucial nature of these systems, dictates a CHGR charger, battery thorough assessment of this inte- grated DFCS program. CPC computer program component CPDS computer program development 2 NOMENCLATURE specification CPPS computer program product AAG air-to-air gunnery specification ~ ACK acknowledge CPU central processing unit i ( A-D analog to dig1tal c.g. center of gravity, percentage mean aerodynamic chord I AD I atti tude directional i indicator D-A digital to analog I AFT1 advanced fighter tech- DAAG decoupled air-to-air gunnery 1 nology integration DASB decoupled air-to-surface I AGL above ground level, ft bombing I I AIU actuator interface unit DASG decoupled air-to-surface I gunnery ALT altimeter I DFCS digital flight control system ~ AMUX avionics multiplex bus 2 DGFT dog fight HS I horizontal situation indicator DN down HUD head-up display DNRM decoupled normal HZ hertz DST device status table hr hours dc direct current I BU independent back-up unit degrees I FFC integrated flight fire control deg/sec degrees per second ILS instrument landing system EMIC electromagnetic interference and compatibility INU inertial navigation unit EPU emergency power unit I oc input-output controller ETSE engineering test support I SA integrated servoactuator equipment KCAS knots calibrated airspeed FCC fire control computers k thousand FCR fire control radar LARAP low-altitude radar autopilot FDIR fault detection, indentifica- tion, and reconfiguration LAT-DIR lateral-directional FLCC flight control computer LCND left canard FM failure manager, a software LEF leading-edge flap component L FLP left trailing edge flap FMET failure modes and effects testing LH left hand FPME f lightpath maneuver L HT left horizontal tail enhancement LOC location in memory flt flight LQS linear quadratic synthesis ft feet LRU line replaceable unit good channel average lb pounds G command M Mach longitudinal acceleration, g MAX maximum afterburner power 3 MHz mi1 lion hertz RCND right canard MIL military power RFLP right flap MPD multipurpose display RH right hand MSL median select log C RHT right horizontal tail MSOV missile override RM redundance managment msec millisecond ROM read only memory NX longitudinal
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aircraft Flight Manual
    AIRCRAFT FLIGHT MANUAL 770-00048 | REVISION A | 03.23.2016 REVISION HISTORY REVISION DATE DESCRIPTION A March 2016 Initial Release ALTA 8 AIRCRAFT FLIGHT MANUAL PART NUMBER: 770-00048 CONTENTS 2 Revision History 3 Contents 6 ALTA 8 OVERVIEW 7 Disclaimer and Warning 9 Limitation of Liability 11 Introduction 12 Symbols, Abbreviations and Terminology 15 Dimensions 17 Included Items 18 Specifications 22 Limitations 24 System Diagrams 28 ALTA Mobile App 28 Additional Required Components (not included) 29 SETTING UP ALTA 8 30 Unfolding/Folding ALTA 8 33 Radio Installation 38 Radio Mapping 43 Configuring for MōVIs 45 Isolator Cartridges 46 Battery Installation 51 Compass Calibration 54 Propellers 56 First Person View (FPV) 63 Tuning ALTA 8 66 ALTA 8 Flight Parameters 69 Resetting ALTA 8 WiFi Password 70 OPERATING ALTA 8 71 Flight Controller Modes 74 Home Switch | AIRCRAFT FLIGHT MANUAL 3 75 Disarm Safety Switch 76 Status Light 78 Alarms 79 Orientation Lights 80 ALTA App Monitor 81 Data Logging 82 NORMAL PROCEDURES 83 Unpacking and Setup 84 Before Starting 86 Before Takeoff 88 After Every Flight 90 After Last Flight 91 EMERGENCY PROCEDURES 92 Emergency Guidance 93 Status Light Warning Indicator Illuminates 94 Pilot Disorientation 95 Unexpected Flight Controller Behavior 96 Battery Exhaustion 97 Loss of Radio Control Signal 98 Loss of FPV Signal 99 PERFORMANCE 100 Weight / Endurance Performance Data 101 Allowable Gross Weight Gross Weight 102 MAINTAINING ALTA 8 103 General Information and Techniques 104 Maintenance Items 108 Firmware Update Process 109 Motor Alignment 112 Guidelines Following an Accident | AIRCRAFT FLIGHT MANUAL 4 113 TROUBLESHOOTING 116 APPENDIX 117 Appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • Fly-By-Wire - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia 11-8-20 下午5:33 Fly-By-Wire from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Fly-by-wire - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 11-8-20 下午5:33 Fly-by-wire From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Fly-by-wire (FBW) is a system that replaces the Fly-by-wire conventional manual flight controls of an aircraft with an electronic interface. The movements of flight controls are converted to electronic signals transmitted by wires (hence the fly-by-wire term), and flight control computers determine how to move the actuators at each control surface to provide the ordered response. The fly-by-wire system also allows automatic signals sent by the aircraft's computers to perform functions without the pilot's input, as in systems that automatically help stabilize the aircraft.[1] Contents Green colored flight control wiring of a test aircraft 1 Development 1.1 Basic operation 1.1.1 Command 1.1.2 Automatic Stability Systems 1.2 Safety and redundancy 1.3 Weight saving 1.4 History 2 Analog systems 3 Digital systems 3.1 Applications 3.2 Legislation 3.3 Redundancy 3.4 Airbus/Boeing 4 Engine digital control 5 Further developments 5.1 Fly-by-optics 5.2 Power-by-wire 5.3 Fly-by-wireless 5.4 Intelligent Flight Control System 6 See also 7 References 8 External links Development http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fly-by-wire Page 1 of 9 Fly-by-wire - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 11-8-20 下午5:33 Mechanical and hydro-mechanical flight control systems are relatively heavy and require careful routing of flight control cables through the aircraft by systems of pulleys, cranks, tension cables and hydraulic pipes.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Principles of Inertial Navigation
    Basic Principles of Inertial Navigation Seminar on inertial navigation systems Tampere University of Technology 1 The five basic forms of navigation • Pilotage, which essentially relies on recognizing landmarks to know where you are. It is older than human kind. • Dead reckoning, which relies on knowing where you started from plus some form of heading information and some estimate of speed. • Celestial navigation, using time and the angles between local vertical and known celestial objects (e.g., sun, moon, or stars). • Radio navigation, which relies on radio‐frequency sources with known locations (including GNSS satellites, LORAN‐C, Omega, Tacan, US Army Position Location and Reporting System…) • Inertial navigation, which relies on knowing your initial position, velocity, and attitude and thereafter measuring your attitude rates and accelerations. The operation of inertial navigation systems (INS) depends upon Newton’s laws of classical mechanics. It is the only form of navigation that does not rely on external references. • These forms of navigation can be used in combination as well. The subject of our seminar is the fifth form of navigation – inertial navigation. 2 A few definitions • Inertia is the property of bodies to maintain constant translational and rotational velocity, unless disturbed by forces or torques, respectively (Newton’s first law of motion). • An inertial reference frame is a coordinate frame in which Newton’s laws of motion are valid. Inertial reference frames are neither rotating nor accelerating. • Inertial sensors measure rotation rate and acceleration, both of which are vector‐ valued variables. • Gyroscopes are sensors for measuring rotation: rate gyroscopes measure rotation rate, and integrating gyroscopes (also called whole‐angle gyroscopes) measure rotation angle.
    [Show full text]
  • FS/OAS A-24, Avionics Operational Test Standards for Contractually
    Avionics Operational Test Standards FS/OAS A-24 Revision F September 10, 2018 The following standards apply to all contractually required/offered avionics equipment under US Forest Service contracts and Department of the Interior interagency fire contracts. Abbreviations and Selected Definitions are in Section 7. 1. Communications Systems Interference No squelch breaks or interference with other transceivers with 1 MHz separation. No transmit interlock functions for communications transceivers on fire aircraft. VHF-AM Transceiver Type TSO approved, selectable frequencies in 25 kHz increments, 760 channel minimum, operation from 118.000 to 136.975 MHz, 720 channel acceptable for DOI if contractually permitted Display Visible in direct sunlight Operation To and from service monitor Transmitter System modulation from 50% to 95% and clear, 5 watts minimum output power, frequency within 20 PPM (+2.46 kHz @ 122.925 MHz) (47 CFR 87.133) Receiver Squelch opens when receiving a signal from 50 Nautical Miles or (All Aircraft) greater when no other radios on the aircraft are transmitting. (See FS/OAS A-30 Radio Interference Test Procedures) Receiver Squelch opens when receiving a signal from 24 Nautical Miles or (Fire aircraft approved greater while other radios on the aircraft are transmitting with a for passengers or aircraft spacing of 2 MHz or greater. (See FS/OAS A-30 Radio Interference requiring two pilots) Test Procedures) 1 Aeronautical VHF-FM Transceiver (P25 required for Fire) Type Listed on Approved Radios list, P25 meets FS/AMD A-19
    [Show full text]
  • Radar Altimeter True Altitude
    RADAR ALTIMETER TRUE ALTITUDE. TRUE SAFETY. ROBUST AND RELIABLE IN RADARDEMANDING ENVIRONMENTS. Building on systems engineering and integration know-how, FreeFlight Systems effectively implements comprehensive, high-integrity avionics solutions. We are focused on the practical application of NextGen technology to real-world operational needs — OEM, retrofit, platform or infrastructure. FreeFlight Systems is a community of respected innovators in technologies of positioning, state-sensing, air traffic management datalinks — including rule-compliant ADS-B systems, data and flight management. An international brand, FreeFlight Systems is a trusted partner as well as a direct-source provider through an established network of relationships. 3 GENERATIONS OF EXPERIENCE BEHIND NEXTGEN AVIONICS NEXTGEN LEADER. INDUSTRY EXPERT. TRUSTED PARTNER. SHAPE THE SKIES. RADAR ALTIMETERS FreeFlight Systems’ certified radar altimeters work consistently in the harshest environments including rotorcraft low altitude hover and terrain transitions. RADAROur radar altimeter systems integrate with popular compatible glass displays. AL RA-4000/4500 & FreeFlight Systems modern radar altimeters are backed by more than 50 years of experience, and FRA-5500 RADAR ALTIMETERS have a proven track record as a reliable solution in Model RA-4000 RA-4500 FRA-5500 the most challenging and critical segments of flight. The TSO and ETSO-approved systems are extensively TSO-C87 l l l deployed worldwide in helicopter fleets, including ETSO-2C87 l l l some of the largest HEMS operations worldwide. DO-160E l l l DO-178 Level B l Designed for helicopter and seaplane operations, our DO-178B Level C l l radar altimeters provide precise AGL information from 2,500 feet to ground level.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of F/A-18 Spin Departure Demonstration Procedure with Departure Resistant Flight Control Computer Version 10.7
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-2004 Development of F/A-18 Spin Departure Demonstration Procedure with Departure Resistant Flight Control Computer Version 10.7 David J. Park University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Aerospace Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Park, David J., "Development of F/A-18 Spin Departure Demonstration Procedure with Departure Resistant Flight Control Computer Version 10.7. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2004. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2312 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by David J. Park entitled "Development of F/A-18 Spin Departure Demonstration Procedure with Departure Resistant Flight Control Computer Version 10.7." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Aviation Systems. Robert. B. Richards, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Charles T. N. Paludan, Richard J. Ranaudo Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by David J.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Coupled Sidesticks on the Pilot Monitoring's Awareness
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Institute of Transport Research:Publications Influence of Coupled Sidesticks on the Pilot Monitoring's Awareness During Flare Alan F. Uehara∗ and Dominik Niedermeiery DLR (German Aerospace Center), Braunschweig, Germany, 38108 Passive sidesticks have been used in modern fly-by-wire commercial airplanes since the late 1980s. These passive sidesticks typically do not feature a mechanical coupling between them, so the pilot's and copilot's sidesticks move independently. This characteristic disabled the pilot monitoring (PM) to perceive the control inputs of the pilot flying (PF). This can lead to problems of awareness in abnormal situations. The development of active inceptor technology made it possible to electronically couple two sidesticks emulating a mechanical coupling. This research focuses on the benefits of coupled sidesticks to the situation awareness of the PM. The final approach and landing scenario was considered for this study. Twelve pilots participated in the simulator experiment. Results suggest that the coupling between sidesticks, allowing the PM to perceive the PF's inputs, can improve the PM's situation awareness. Nomenclature ADI Attitude Director Indicator PF Pilot Flying AGL Above Ground Level PFD Primary Flight Display ATC Air Traffic Control PM Pilot Monitoring DLR German Aerospace Center PNF Pilot Not Flying FAA Federal Aviation Administration SA Situation Awareness FBW Fly-By-Wire SOP Standard Operating Procedure FCS Flight Control System TOGA Takeoff/Go-Around KCAS Knots Calibrated Airspeed VMC Visual Meteorological Conditions IMC Instrument Meteorological Conditions I. Introduction he control inceptors and the actuators of the control surfaces are mechanically decoupled in fly-by-wire T(FBW) airplanes.
    [Show full text]
  • Fly-By-Wire: Getting Started on the Right Foot and Staying There…
    Fly-by-Wire: Getting started on the right foot and staying there… Imagine yourself getting into the cockpit of an aircraft, finishing your preflight checks, and taxiing out to the runway ready for takeoff. You begin the takeoff roll and start to rotate. As you lift off, you discover your side stick controller is not responding correctly to your commands. Panic sets in, and you feel that you’ve lost total control of the aircraft. Thanks to quick action from your second in command, he takes over and stabilizes the aircraft so that you both can plan to return to the airport under reversionary mode. This situation could have been a catastrophe. This happened in August of 2001. A Lufthansa Airbus A320 came within less than two feet and a few seconds of crashing during takeoff on a planned flight from Frankfurt to Paris. Preliminary reports indicated that maintenance was performed on the captain’s sidestick controller immediately before the incident. This had inadvertently created a situation in which control inputs were reversed. The case reveals that at least two "filters," or safety defenses, were breached, leading to a near-crash shortly after rotation at Frankfurt’s Runway 18. Quick action by the first officer prevented a catastrophe. Lufthansa Technik personnel found a damaged pin on one segment of the four connector segments (with 140 pins on each) at the "rack side," as it were, of the avionics mount. This incident prompted an article to be published in the 2003 November-December issue of the Flight Safety Mechanics Bulletin. The report detailed all that transpired during the maintenance and subsequent release of the aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeppesen Tailored Charts for Avionics Frequently Asked Questions
    Business Aviation Jeppesen Tailored Charts for Avionics Frequently Asked Questions Q. What is Tailored Charts for Avionics? Q. Which avionics equipment support A. Jeppesen Tailored Charts for Avionics is an extended service/ tailored charts? usage for all customers subscribing to tailored chart services who A. Generally speaking, any avionics systems that can display operate qualifying-avionics equipped aircraft. This service enables Jeppesen charts could support tailored charts. However, in your tailored charts to be viewed on front panel avionics displays. some technical cases, the manner in which each avionics system implemented the specifications can vary, resulting in limitations Q. As the customer, why would I want to subscribe for displaying some tailored charts. Due to the complex nature of to this service? this charting service, Jeppesen will only offer tailored charts for A. If you currently, or plan to, subscribe to Jeppesen tailored charts systems that have been fully tested and approved. Please contact and you operate an aircraft equipped with certified avionics that can your Jeppesen sales or account management representative to display Jeppesen charts, there are many reasons to subscribe to this learn more. If you do not have a representative, please fill out the contact us form on this product page and a representative will be in optional service. touch with you. e More options and flexibility to display chart navigation information. All charts within a subscription coverage (tailored and standard) Q. Are there avionics software configuration can be accessed independently between EFBs or the front panel. settings required before Jeppesen tailored charts can be utilized? e More efficient workflows are possible because the flight deck crew can work independently as needed to plan and execute their A.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Aviation Maintenance Profession
    Subject: OVERVIEW OF THE AVIATION Date: 11/09/01 AC No: 65-30A MAINTENANCE PROFESSION Initiated By: AFS-305 Change: 1. PURPOSE. This advisory circular (AC) was prepared by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Flight Standards Service to provide information to prospective airframe and powerplant mechanics and other persons interested in the certification of mechanics. It contains information about the certificate requirements, application procedures, and the mechanic written, oral, and practical tests. 2. CANCELLATION. AC 65-30, Overview of the Aviation Maintenance Profession, dated June 27, 2000, and AC 65-11B, Airframe and Power Plant Mechanics Certification Information, revised in 1987, are canceled. 3. RELATED 14 CFR REFERENCES. Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). a. Part 65, Certification: Airmen other than Flight Crewmembers. b. Part 145, Repair Stations. c. Part 147, Aviation Maintenance Technician Schools. d. Part 187, Fees. 4. RELATED READING MATERIAL. a. To obtain a directory of names and school locations that are FAA certified under the provision of 14 CFR part 147, write to: U.S. Department of Transportation; Subsequent Distribution Office; Ardmore East Business Center; 3341 Q. 75th Ave.; Landover, MD 20785. Request AC 147-2EE, Directory of FAA Certificated Aviation Maintenance Technician Schools. This AC is a free publication. b. For educational assistance, contact the Department of Education, Office of Student Financial Assistance, 400 Maryland Ave, S.W., Washington D.C. 20202. AC 65-30A 11/09/01 c. A comprehensive list of all airlines, repair stations, manufacturers, and fixed base operators (FBO) can be found in the World Aviation Directory at the reference section of your local library.
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Altimeter Industry Coalition Coalition Overview David Silver, Aerospace Industries Association
    Radio Altimeter Industry Coalition Coalition Overview David Silver, Aerospace Industries Association 7/1/2021 2 Background • The aviation industry, working through a multi-stakeholder group formed after open, public invitation by RTCA, conducted a study to determine interference threshold to radio altimeters • The study found that 5G systems operating in the 3.7-3.98 GHz band will cause harmful interference altimeter systems operating in the 4.2- 4.4 GHz band – and in some cases far exceed interference thresholds • Harmful interference has the serious potential to impact public and aviation safety, create delays in aircraft operations, and prevent operations responding to emergency situations 7/1/2021 3 Goals and Way Forward • To ensure the safety of the public and aviation community, government, manufacturers, and operators must work together to: • Further refine the full scope of the interference threat • Determine operational environments affected • Identify technical solutions that will resolve interference issues • Develop future standards • Government needs to bring the telecom and aviation industries to the table to refine understanding of the extent of the problem and collaboratively develop mitigations to address the changing spectrum environment near-, mid-, and long- term. 7/1/2021 4 Coalition Tech-Ops Presentation John Shea, Helicopter Association International Sai Kalyanaraman, Ph.D., Collins Aerospace 7/1/2021 5 What is a Radar Altimeter? • Radar altimeters are the only device on the aircraft that can directly measure the distance between the aircraft and the ground and only operate in 4200-4400 MHz • Operate when the aircraft is on the surface to over 2500’ above ground Radar Altimeter Antennas Radar Altimeter Antennas Photo credit: Honeywell Photo credit: ALPA 7/1/2021 6 How Does a Radar Altimeter Work? 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Management in Fly-By-Wire Systems
    NASA Technical Memorandum 104757 Risk Management in Fly-by-Wire Systems Karyn T. Knoll March 1993 NASA r (NASA-TM-104757) RISK MANAGEMENT N93-22703 IN FLY-BY-WIRE SYSTEMS (NASA) 23 p Unclas G3/17 0156304 NASA Technical Memorandum 104757 Risk Management in Fly-by-Wire Systems KarynT. Knoll Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas March 1993 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas CONTENTS Section Page Abstract 1 Introduction . 1 Description of Fly-by-Wire Systems 1 Risks Inherent in Fly-by-Wire Systems 2 Risk Management in the Fly-by-Wire Industry 5 Configuration Control '. 5 Verification and Validation 6 Tools 7 Backup Flight Control Systems 9 Risk Management and the Space Shuttle Program 12 References 17 TABLE Table Page 1 Right Control System Summary 15 PRECEDING PAGE BLANK NOT FILMED Abstract A general description of various types of fly-by-wire systems is provided. The risks inherent in digital flight control systems, like the Space Shuttle, are identified. The results of a literature survey examining risk management methods in use throughout the aerospace industry are presented. The applicability of these methods to the Space Shuttle program is discussed. Introduction Since the development of the Space Shuttle, many other aerospace vehicles have incorporated fly-by-wire technologies in their flight control systems in an effort to improve performance, efficiency, and reliability. Because the flight control system is a critical component of any aerospace vehicle, it is especially important that the risks inherent in using fly-by-wire technologies are thoroughly understood and carefully managed.
    [Show full text]