DOCSLIB.ORG

1. Antiderivatives for Exponential Functions Recall That for F(X) = Ec⋅X, F ′(X) = C ⋅ Ec⋅X (For Any Constant C)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1. Antiderivatives for Exponential Functions Recall That for F(X) = Ec⋅X, F ′(X) = C ⋅ Ec⋅X (For Any Constant C) 1. Antiderivatives for exponential functions Recall that for f(x) = ec⋅x, f ′(x) = c ⋅ ec⋅x (for any constant c). That is, ex is its own derivative. So it makes sense that it is its own antiderivative as well! Theorem 1.1 (Antiderivatives of exponential functions). Let f(x) = ec⋅x for some 1 constant c. Then F x ec⋅c D, for any constant D, is an antiderivative of ( ) = c + f(x). 1 c⋅x ′ 1 c⋅x c⋅x Proof. Consider F (x) = c e +D. Then by the chain rule, F (x) = c⋅ c e +0 = e . So F (x) is an antiderivative of f(x). Of course, the theorem does not work for c = 0, but then we would have that f(x) = e0 = 1, which is constant. By the power rule, an antiderivative would be F (x) = x + C for some constant C. 1 2. Antiderivative for f(x) = x We have the power rule for antiderivatives, but it does not work for f(x) = x−1. 1 However, we know that the derivative of ln(x) is x . So it makes sense that the 1 antiderivative of x should be ln(x). Unfortunately, it is not. But it is close. 1 1 Theorem 2.1 (Antiderivative of f(x) = x ). Let f(x) = x . Then the antiderivatives of f(x) are of the form F (x) = ln(SxS) + C. Proof. Notice that ln(x) for x > 0 F (x) = ln(SxS) = . ln(−x) for x < 0 ′ 1 For x > 0, we have [ln(x)] = x . ′ 1 1 For x < 0, we have from the chain rule that [ln(−x)] = − −x = x . 1 So ln(SxS) + C is indeed an antiderivative of f(x) = x . Why do we use F (x) = ln(SxS) rather than ln(x)? Notice that ln(x) is defined only for x > 0, while ln(SxS) is defined for all real numbers other than 0. Further 1 2 1 note that f(x) = x is defined also for all real numbers other than 0. It is so the 1 domains of x and its antiderivatives match up. 3. Another definition of ln(x) We defined ln(x) as the inverse function of ex. There is another way to define ln(x) using calculus. We define x 1 ln(x) = dt. S1 t In the interest of time, we will not go through the proof that shows our definition of ln(x) and this new one are exactly the same funtion. But we should be aware of its existence as it is actually a very historical definition. 4. Integration by substitution √ Suppose we would like to find S x + 3dx. How could we go about doing this? √ We need to find a function F (x) whose derivative is x + 3. None of our methods so far seem to work. We will make a substitution of variables. The motivation for doing this is to turn √ the integral into a more friendly form. Let u = x+3. Then we would have ∫ udx. Unfortunately, we cannot take this derivative. Notice that the dx signifies that we are integrating with respect to x. We need to somehow replace dx by du in some way. Notice that u is a function of x, so we may differentiate it with respect du to x. dx = 1. So du = dx. So the differential of u is identical to the differential of x, so we can just make the substitution. So we get √udu 2 u3~2 C. So ∫ = 3 + we have taken the derivative, but we would like the function to be in terms of x. This is simple to fix, just reverse the substitution. Remember, u = x + 3. Thus, 2 3~2 2 3~2 3 u + C = 3 (x + 3) + C, which is our antiderivative. We should note that the C′s above are not necessarily the same, but as they are arbitrary numbers, it is fine to call them both C. We should check that this is actually an antiderivative of f(x). We use the chain ′ 3 2 1~2 √ rule to get F (x) = 2 ⋅ 3 (x + 3) ⋅ 1 = x + 3. So, it is indeed an antiderivative. What we did is a method often called u-subsitution. Intuitively, it \undoes" the chain rule for derivatives. We know that d F g x F ′ g x g′ x f g x g′ x , dx ( ( )) = ( ( )) ⋅ ( ) = ( ( )) ⋅ ( ) 3 where F ′(x) = f(x). This is just the chain rule. Now integrate both sides to get d F g x f g x g′ x . S dx ( ( )) = S ( ( )) ⋅ ( ) By the fundamental theorem of calculus, d F g x dx F g x C, so we ∫ dx ( ( )) = ( ( )) + get ′ S f(g(x)) ⋅ g (x)dx = F (g(x)) + C. What this means is if you have a function of the form f(g(x)) ⋅ g′(x) for some ′ functions f(x) and g(x), then S f(g(x)) ⋅ g (x)dx = F (g(x)) + C, where F (x) is the antiderivative of f(x). So to use this method, we must watch for functions that are of the form a composition of functions multiplied by the derivative of the insider function of that composition. This sounds convoluted, but with practice, it becomes much more natural. 2 Example 1. Find ∫ 2x sin(x )dx. Here we have that sin(x2) is a composition of functions. If f(x) = sin(x) and g(x) = x2, then our function is of the form f(g(x)) ⋅ g′(x). So we can use the substitution method. 2 2 We get ∫ sin(x ) ⋅ 2xdx = − cos(x ) + C. We can easily check this by differenti- ating. That was a very nice example, so let's try something a little harder. 5x6 Example 2. Find dx. S 12x7 + 19 7 du 6 We need a g(x). for simplicity, say g(x) = u = 12x + 19. Then dx = 84x , which gives du = 84x6dx. We can easily substitute in u to get 5x6 5x6 dx = dx. S 12x7 + 19 S u We need to somehow get rid of that 5x6dx and get some sort of du. Well, we 6 5 6 know du = 84x dx. So 84 du = 5x dx. So we have the new integral 6 5x 5 1 5 5 7 dx = du = ln(SuS) + C = ln(S12x + 19S) + C. S 12x7 + 19 S 84 u 84 84 4 We can check this by differentiating with the chain rule. 5. Integration by parts We have an integration method that \undoes" the chain rule for derivatives. We now present a method that \undoes" the product rule for derivatives. The method is know as integration by parts. From the product rule, we know that ′ ′ ′ [f(x) ⋅ g(x)] = f(x)g (x) + g(x)f (x). Rearranging, we get ′ ′ ′ f(x)g (x) = [f(x) ⋅ g(x)] − g(x)f (x). Now we integrate both sides to get ′ ′ S f(x) ⋅ g (x)dx = f(x) ⋅ g(x) − S g(x) ⋅ f (x)dx. du ′ dv ′ Finally, call u = f(x) and v = g(x). Then dx = f (x) and dx = g (x). Then we get the very important formula S u ⋅ dv = u ⋅ v − S v ⋅ du. Example 3. Find ∫ ln(x)dx. This may not look like a formula of the form u ⋅ dv, but it is. If we let u = ln(x) 1 and v = x, then du = x dx and dv = 1dx. So S ln(x)dx = S u ⋅ dv = u ⋅ v − S v ⋅ du = ln(x) ⋅ x − S 1dx = ln(x) ⋅ x − x + C. To reiterate, ∫ ln(x)dx = x ln(x) − x + C. Example 4. Find ∫ x cos(x)dx. 5 The challenge of integration by parts problems is to determine which function should be u and which should be dv. Let's see what happens when we let u = cos(x) 1 2 and dv = xdx. Then we get v = 2 x and du = −sin(x)dx. Then 1 1 x cos x dx x2 cos x x2 sin x dx. S ( ) = 2 ( ) − S −2 ( ) While this formula is true, our choices of u and dv yielded a much more com- plicated formula. So let's switch them. u = x and dv = cos(x)dx. So du = 1dx and v = sin(x). So we get S x cos(x)dx = x sin(x) − S sin(x)dx = x sin(x) + cos(x) + C. As with all antiderivative problems, we can check our answer with differentiation. The integration by parts formula is worth memorizing. Some people use the mneumonic \ultra-violet voodoo" to help remembering it..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Brief but Important Note on the Product Rule
    A brief but important note on the product rule Peter Merrotsy The University of Western Australia [email protected] The product rule in the Australian Curriculum he product rule refers to the derivative of the product of two functions Texpressed in terms of the functions and their derivatives. This result first naturally appears in the subject Mathematical Methods in the senior secondary Australian Curriculum (Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA], n.d.b). In the curriculum content, it is mentioned by name only (Unit 3, Topic 1, ACMMM104). Elsewhere (Glossary, p. 6), detail is given in the form: If h(x) = f(x) g(x), then h'(x) = f(x) g'(x) + f '(x) g(x) (1) or, in Leibniz notation, d dv du ()u v = u + v (2) dx dx dx presupposing, of course, that both u and v are functions of x. In the Australian Capital Territory (ACT Board of Senior Secondary Studies, 2014, pp. 28, 43), Tasmania (Tasmanian Qualifications Authority, 2014, p. 21) and Western Australia (School Curriculum and Standards Authority, 2014, WACE, Mathematical Methods Year 12, pp. 9, 22), these statements of the Australian Senior Mathematics Journal vol. 30 no. 2 product rule have been adopted without further commentary. Elsewhere, there are varying attempts at elaboration. The SACE Board of South Australia (2015, p. 29) refers simply to “differentiating functions of the form , using the product rule.” In Queensland (Queensland Studies Authority, 2008, p. 14), a slight shift in notation is suggested by referring to rules for differentiation, including: d []f (t)g(t) (product rule) (3) dt At first, the Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (2015, p.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Mathematical Modelling
    An Introduction to Mathematical Modelling Glenn Marion, Bioinformatics and Statistics Scotland Given 2008 by Daniel Lawson and Glenn Marion 2008 Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Whatismathematicalmodelling?. .......... 1 1.2 Whatobjectivescanmodellingachieve? . ............ 1 1.3 Classificationsofmodels . ......... 1 1.4 Stagesofmodelling............................... ....... 2 2 Building models 4 2.1 Gettingstarted .................................. ...... 4 2.2 Systemsanalysis ................................. ...... 4 2.2.1 Makingassumptions ............................. .... 4 2.2.2 Flowdiagrams .................................. 6 2.3 Choosingmathematicalequations. ........... 7 2.3.1 Equationsfromtheliterature . ........ 7 2.3.2 Analogiesfromphysics. ...... 8 2.3.3 Dataexploration ............................... .... 8 2.4 Solvingequations................................ ....... 9 2.4.1 Analytically.................................. .... 9 2.4.2 Numerically................................... 10 3 Studying models 12 3.1 Dimensionlessform............................... ....... 12 3.2 Asymptoticbehaviour ............................. ....... 12 3.3 Sensitivityanalysis . ......... 14 3.4 Modellingmodeloutput . ....... 16 4 Testing models 18 4.1 Testingtheassumptions . ........ 18 4.2 Modelstructure.................................. ...... 18 i 4.3 Predictionofpreviouslyunuseddata . ............ 18 4.3.1 Reasonsforpredictionerrors . ........ 20 4.4 Estimatingmodelparameters . ......... 20 4.5 Comparingtwomodelsforthesamesystem . .........
    [Show full text]
  • Example 10.8 Testing the Steady-State Approximation. ⊕ a B C C a B C P + → → + → D Dt K K K K K K [ ]
    Example 10.8 Testing the steady-state approximation. Å The steady-state approximation contains an apparent contradiction: we set the time derivative of the concentration of some species (a reaction intermediate) equal to zero — implying that it is a constant — and then derive a formula showing how it changes with time. Actually, there is no contradiction since all that is required it that the rate of change of the "steady" species be small compared to the rate of reaction (as measured by the rate of disappearance of the reactant or appearance of the product). But exactly when (in a practical sense) is this approximation appropriate? It is often applied as a matter of convenience and justified ex post facto — that is, if the resulting rate law fits the data then the approximation is considered justified. But as this example demonstrates, such reasoning is dangerous and possible erroneous. We examine the mechanism A + B ¾¾1® C C ¾¾2® A + B (10.12) 3 C® P (Note that the second reaction is the reverse of the first, so we have a reversible second-order reaction followed by an irreversible first-order reaction.) The rate constants are k1 for the forward reaction of the first step, k2 for the reverse of the first step, and k3 for the second step. This mechanism is readily solved for with the steady-state approximation to give d[A] k1k3 = - ke[A][B] with ke = (10.13) dt k2 + k3 (TEXT Eq. (10.38)). With initial concentrations of A and B equal, hence [A] = [B] for all times, this equation integrates to 1 1 = + ket (10.14) [A] A0 where A0 is the initial concentration (equal to 1 in work to follow).
    [Show full text]
  • Antiderivatives and the Area Problem
    Chapter 7 antiderivatives and the area problem Let me begin by defining the terms in the title: 1. an antiderivative of f is another function F such that F 0 = f. 2. the area problem is: ”find the area of a shape in the plane" This chapter is concerned with understanding the area problem and then solving it through the fundamental theorem of calculus(FTC). We begin by discussing antiderivatives. At first glance it is not at all obvious this has to do with the area problem. However, antiderivatives do solve a number of interesting physical problems so we ought to consider them if only for that reason. The beginning of the chapter is devoted to understanding the type of question which an antiderivative solves as well as how to perform a number of basic indefinite integrals. Once all of this is accomplished we then turn to the area problem. To understand the area problem carefully we'll need to think some about the concepts of finite sums, se- quences and limits of sequences. These concepts are quite natural and we will see that the theory for these is easily transferred from some of our earlier work. Once the limit of a sequence and a number of its basic prop- erties are established we then define area and the definite integral. Finally, the remainder of the chapter is devoted to understanding the fundamental theorem of calculus and how it is applied to solve definite integrals. I have attempted to be rigorous in this chapter, however, you should understand that there are superior treatments of integration(Riemann-Stieltjes, Lesbeque etc..) which cover a greater variety of functions in a more logically complete fashion.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Chain Rule Name
    Anti-Chain Rule Name: The most fundamental rule for computing derivatives in calculus is the Chain Rule, from which all other differentiation rules are derived. In words, the Chain Rule states that, to differentiate f(g(x)), differentiate the outside function f and multiply by the derivative of the inside function g, so that d f(g(x)) = f 0(g(x)) · g0(x): dx The Chain Rule makes computation of nearly all derivatives fairly easy. It is tempting to think that there should be an Anti-Chain Rule that makes antidiffer- entiation as easy as the Chain Rule made differentiation. Such a rule would just reverse the process, so instead of differentiating f and multiplying by g0, we would antidifferentiate f and divide by g0. In symbols, Z F (g(x)) f(g(x)) dx = + C: g0(x) Unfortunately, the Anti-Chain Rule does not exist because the formula above is not Z always true. For example, consider (x2 + 1)2 dx. We can compute this integral (correctly) by expanding and applying the power rule: Z Z (x2 + 1)2 dx = x4 + 2x2 + 1 dx x5 2x3 = + + x + C 5 3 However, we could also think about our integrand above as f(g(x)) with f(x) = x2 and g(x) = x2 + 1. Then we have F (x) = x3=3 and g0(x) = 2x, so the Anti-Chain Rule would predict that Z F (g(x)) (x2 + 1)2 dx = + C g0(x) (x2 + 1)3 = + C 3 · 2x x6 + 3x4 + 3x2 + 1 = + C 6x x5 x3 x 1 = + + + + C 6 2 2 6x Since these answers are different, we conclude that the Anti-Chain Rule has failed us.
    [Show full text]
  • Differentiation Rules (Differential Calculus)
    Differentiation Rules (Differential Calculus) 1. Notation The derivative of a function f with respect to one independent variable (usually x or t) is a function that will be denoted by D f . Note that f (x) and (D f )(x) are the values of these functions at x. 2. Alternate Notations for (D f )(x) d d f (x) d f 0 (1) For functions f in one variable, x, alternate notations are: Dx f (x), dx f (x), dx , dx (x), f (x), f (x). The “(x)” part might be dropped although technically this changes the meaning: f is the name of a function, dy 0 whereas f (x) is the value of it at x. If y = f (x), then Dxy, dx , y , etc. can be used. If the variable t represents time then Dt f can be written f˙. The differential, “d f ”, and the change in f ,“D f ”, are related to the derivative but have special meanings and are never used to indicate ordinary differentiation. dy 0 Historical note: Newton used y,˙ while Leibniz used dx . About a century later Lagrange introduced y and Arbogast introduced the operator notation D. 3. Domains The domain of D f is always a subset of the domain of f . The conventional domain of f , if f (x) is given by an algebraic expression, is all values of x for which the expression is defined and results in a real number. If f has the conventional domain, then D f usually, but not always, has conventional domain. Exceptions are noted below.
    [Show full text]
  • A Quotient Rule Integration by Parts Formula Jennifer Switkes ([email protected]), California State Polytechnic Univer- Sity, Pomona, CA 91768
    A Quotient Rule Integration by Parts Formula Jennifer Switkes ([email protected]), California State Polytechnic Univer- sity, Pomona, CA 91768 In a recent calculus course, I introduced the technique of Integration by Parts as an integration rule corresponding to the Product Rule for differentiation. I showed my students the standard derivation of the Integration by Parts formula as presented in [1]: By the Product Rule, if f (x) and g(x) are differentiable functions, then d f (x)g(x) = f (x)g(x) + g(x) f (x). dx Integrating on both sides of this equation, f (x)g(x) + g(x) f (x) dx = f (x)g(x), which may be rearranged to obtain f (x)g(x) dx = f (x)g(x) − g(x) f (x) dx. Letting U = f (x) and V = g(x) and observing that dU = f (x) dx and dV = g(x) dx, we obtain the familiar Integration by Parts formula UdV= UV − VdU. (1) My student Victor asked if we could do a similar thing with the Quotient Rule. While the other students thought this was a crazy idea, I was intrigued. Below, I derive a Quotient Rule Integration by Parts formula, apply the resulting integration formula to an example, and discuss reasons why this formula does not appear in calculus texts. By the Quotient Rule, if f (x) and g(x) are differentiable functions, then ( ) ( ) ( ) − ( ) ( ) d f x = g x f x f x g x . dx g(x) [g(x)]2 Integrating both sides of this equation, we get f (x) g(x) f (x) − f (x)g(x) = dx.
    [Show full text]
  • 9.2. Undoing the Chain Rule
    < Previous Section Home Next Section > 9.2. Undoing the Chain Rule This chapter focuses on finding accumulation functions in closed form when we know its rate of change function. We’ve seen that 1) an accumulation function in closed form is advantageous for quickly and easily generating many values of the accumulating quantity, and 2) the key to finding accumulation functions in closed form is the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. The FTC says that an accumulation function is the antiderivative of the given rate of change function (because rate of change is the derivative of accumulation). In Chapter 6, we developed many derivative rules for quickly finding closed form rate of change functions from closed form accumulation functions. We also made a connection between the form of a rate of change function and the form of the accumulation function from which it was derived. Rather than inventing a whole new set of techniques for finding antiderivatives, our mindset as much as possible will be to use our derivatives rules in reverse to find antiderivatives. We worked hard to develop the derivative rules, so let’s keep using them to find antiderivatives! Thus, whenever you have a rate of change function f and are charged with finding its antiderivative, you should frame the task with the question “What function has f as its derivative?” For simple rate of change functions, this is easy, as long as you know your derivative rules well enough to apply them in reverse. For example, given a rate of change function …. … 2x, what function has 2x as its derivative? i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • PLEASANTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Math 8/Algebra I Course Outline Form Course Title
    PLEASANTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Math 8/Algebra I Course Outline Form Course Title: Math 8/Algebra I Course Number/CBED Number: Grade Level: 8 Length of Course: 1 year Credit: 10 Meets Graduation Requirements: n/a Required for Graduation: Prerequisite: Math 6/7 or Math 7 Course Description: Main concepts from the CCSS 8th grade content standards include: knowing that there are numbers that are not rational, and approximate them by rational numbers; working with radicals and integer exponents; understanding the connections between proportional relationships, lines, and linear equations; analyzing and solving linear equations and pairs of simultaneous linear equations; defining, evaluating, and comparing functions; using functions to model relationships between quantities; understanding congruence and similarity using physical models, transparencies, or geometry software; understanding and applying the Pythagorean Theorem; investigating patterns of association in bivariate data. Algebra (CCSS Algebra) main concepts include: reason quantitatively and use units to solve problems; create equations that describe numbers or relationships; understanding solving equations as a process of reasoning and explain reasoning; solve equations and inequalities in one variable; solve systems of equations; represent and solve equations and inequalities graphically; extend the properties of exponents to rational exponents; use properties of rational and irrational numbers; analyze and solve linear equations and pairs of simultaneous linear equations; define,
    [Show full text]
  • Calculus Terminology
    AP Calculus BC Calculus Terminology Absolute Convergence Asymptote Continued Sum Absolute Maximum Average Rate of Change Continuous Function Absolute Minimum Average Value of a Function Continuously Differentiable Function Absolutely Convergent Axis of Rotation Converge Acceleration Boundary Value Problem Converge Absolutely Alternating Series Bounded Function Converge Conditionally Alternating Series Remainder Bounded Sequence Convergence Tests Alternating Series Test Bounds of Integration Convergent Sequence Analytic Methods Calculus Convergent Series Annulus Cartesian Form Critical Number Antiderivative of a Function Cavalieri’s Principle Critical Point Approximation by Differentials Center of Mass Formula Critical Value Arc Length of a Curve Centroid Curly d Area below a Curve Chain Rule Curve Area between Curves Comparison Test Curve Sketching Area of an Ellipse Concave Cusp Area of a Parabolic Segment Concave Down Cylindrical Shell Method Area under a Curve Concave Up Decreasing Function Area Using Parametric Equations Conditional Convergence Definite Integral Area Using Polar Coordinates Constant Term Definite Integral Rules Degenerate Divergent Series Function Operations Del Operator e Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Deleted Neighborhood Ellipsoid GLB Derivative End Behavior Global Maximum Derivative of a Power Series Essential Discontinuity Global Minimum Derivative Rules Explicit Differentiation Golden Spiral Difference Quotient Explicit Function Graphic Methods Differentiable Exponential Decay Greatest Lower Bound Differential
    [Show full text]
  • Matrix Calculus
    Appendix D Matrix Calculus From too much study, and from extreme passion, cometh madnesse. Isaac Newton [205, §5] − D.1 Gradient, Directional derivative, Taylor series D.1.1 Gradients Gradient of a differentiable real function f(x) : RK R with respect to its vector argument is defined uniquely in terms of partial derivatives→ ∂f(x) ∂x1 ∂f(x) , ∂x2 RK f(x) . (2053) ∇ . ∈ . ∂f(x) ∂xK while the second-order gradient of the twice differentiable real function with respect to its vector argument is traditionally called the Hessian; 2 2 2 ∂ f(x) ∂ f(x) ∂ f(x) 2 ∂x1 ∂x1∂x2 ··· ∂x1∂xK 2 2 2 ∂ f(x) ∂ f(x) ∂ f(x) 2 2 K f(x) , ∂x2∂x1 ∂x2 ··· ∂x2∂xK S (2054) ∇ . ∈ . .. 2 2 2 ∂ f(x) ∂ f(x) ∂ f(x) 2 ∂xK ∂x1 ∂xK ∂x2 ∂x ··· K interpreted ∂f(x) ∂f(x) 2 ∂ ∂ 2 ∂ f(x) ∂x1 ∂x2 ∂ f(x) = = = (2055) ∂x1∂x2 ³∂x2 ´ ³∂x1 ´ ∂x2∂x1 Dattorro, Convex Optimization Euclidean Distance Geometry, Mεβoo, 2005, v2020.02.29. 599 600 APPENDIX D. MATRIX CALCULUS The gradient of vector-valued function v(x) : R RN on real domain is a row vector → v(x) , ∂v1(x) ∂v2(x) ∂vN (x) RN (2056) ∇ ∂x ∂x ··· ∂x ∈ h i while the second-order gradient is 2 2 2 2 , ∂ v1(x) ∂ v2(x) ∂ vN (x) RN v(x) 2 2 2 (2057) ∇ ∂x ∂x ··· ∂x ∈ h i Gradient of vector-valued function h(x) : RK RN on vector domain is → ∂h1(x) ∂h2(x) ∂hN (x) ∂x1 ∂x1 ··· ∂x1 ∂h1(x) ∂h2(x) ∂hN (x) h(x) , ∂x2 ∂x2 ··· ∂x2 ∇ .
    [Show full text]
  • Infinitesimal Calculus
    Infinitesimal Calculus Δy ΔxΔy and “cannot stand” Δx • Derivative of the sum/difference of two functions (x + Δx) ± (y + Δy) = (x + y) + Δx + Δy ∴ we have a change of Δx + Δy. • Derivative of the product of two functions (x + Δx)(y + Δy) = xy + Δxy + xΔy + ΔxΔy ∴ we have a change of Δxy + xΔy. • Derivative of the product of three functions (x + Δx)(y + Δy)(z + Δz) = xyz + Δxyz + xΔyz + xyΔz + xΔyΔz + ΔxΔyz + xΔyΔz + ΔxΔyΔ ∴ we have a change of Δxyz + xΔyz + xyΔz. • Derivative of the quotient of three functions x Let u = . Then by the product rule above, yu = x yields y uΔy + yΔu = Δx. Substituting for u its value, we have xΔy Δxy − xΔy + yΔu = Δx. Finding the value of Δu , we have y y2 • Derivative of a power function (and the “chain rule”) Let y = x m . ∴ y = x ⋅ x ⋅ x ⋅...⋅ x (m times). By a generalization of the product rule, Δy = (xm−1Δx)(x m−1Δx)(x m−1Δx)...⋅ (xm −1Δx) m times. ∴ we have Δy = mx m−1Δx. • Derivative of the logarithmic function Let y = xn , n being constant. Then log y = nlog x. Differentiating y = xn , we have dy dy dy y y dy = nxn−1dx, or n = = = , since xn−1 = . Again, whatever n−1 y dx x dx dx x x x the differentials of log x and log y are, we have d(log y) = n ⋅ d(log x), or d(log y) n = . Placing these values of n equal to each other, we obtain d(log x) dy d(log y) y dy = .
    [Show full text]