Outline of AMC Request for Cost Estimates

AMC Request for WRAP Annual Cost Estimates

Activity Area Costs from AMC request for cost estimates

2010 2011

Base I Annual Funding – On-going System $335,000 $335,000 Maintenance and Operation Base II Annual Funding, Regional Haze – $3,090,000 $2,900,000 Periodic Assessments Regional Haze Subtotal $3,425,000 $3,235,000 Additional Regional Technical Assessments, assuming full funding is provided for Base 1 & Base 2) $1,065,000 $965,000 a. Ozone Annual Funding b. Mercury Annual Funding 50,000 50,000 c. NOx/Nitrate/Nitrogen Annual Funding Incl. in Ozone Incl. in Ozone

Additional Regional Technical Assessments $1,115,000 $1,015,000 subtotal

Regional Haze + Additional Technical $4,540,000 $4,250,000 Assessments total 1. Maintain the most critical ongoing systems for implementation of regional haze requirements. Lights on, Running the systems, keeping data current and available a. TSS, VIEWS, EDMS, FETS data updates Base I Annual Funding – On-going System Maintenance and Operation Contracted System, Sponsoring Annual Costs Description or Additional Activity, etc. Committee Information EDMS operations EIF a.(i), (ii) 75,000 Haze emissions tracking, and maintenance TDAWG c (i) storage, analyses FETS operations and FSEF a. (i), (ii) 75,000 Data base compilation for maintenance wildfire, planned and accomplished Rx activities and emissions TSS/VIEWS System TAF a. (i), (iii) 175,000 Management, data display Maintenance updating and storage, tool development, training, other major operational elements 309 SO2 Milestone RHIWG c. 10,000 Implementation of program, Program tracking ongoing since 2003 Hardware and Incl software Website maintenance Incl. Personnel costs Travel support Overhead estimate Recommended Incl. List and explain each system/infrastructure separately enhancements Annual 335,000 SUBTOTAL, Base I

2 2. Conduct periodic monitoring, emissions, modeling and other analyses required by the regional haze rule a. Upgrade data quality – fill data gaps and holes in emission source categories and monitoring networks. Provide most current emission projections for RH planning 2012?, 2018 Additional modeling needed for 2012 check-in Base II Annual Funding, Regional Haze – Periodic Assessments Year Needed Assessment Cost Additional information Description 2010-2011 Supplemental 1,065,000 Filling ‘holes’ in selected Emissions updates for 40+225+75 source categories, including haze EIF b. (i), c. (i)- 25+30+90+25 tribes; Updating EIs for 2012 (iv); d. (i)-(iv); 20+15+65 SIP review (example) O&GWG a-d; FSEF 75+100+200 b (i), (ii), c; TDAWG 50+30 a, b, c(ii), TOC c, d 2005-2010 Supplemental 85,000 In concert with emission and Monitoring updates 35+30+20 modeling updates for 2012 for haze TAF c (i)- SIP review (example) (iii) Required modeling 850,000 Explain each and the cost per and other analyses analysis effort required for regional 100+ haze RHIWG a, b; 150+300+250+25+ TAF b (i), (iii), (iv), 25 (vi), (vii) Additional 350,000 Explain each and the cost per recommended 100+75+50+60+65 analysis effort modeling and other analyses required for regional haze TAF b. (ii), (v), (viii) – (x), TDAWG a Hardware and Incl software Website Incl. maintenance Personnel costs TOC a. 390,000 Including benefits Travel support staff TOC a. Incl. Travel support, TOC a. 125,000 meeting costs Overhead estimate TOC a. 140,000 e.g., admin staff, rent, etc. Recommended Incl. List and explain each system/infrastructure separately enhancements

3 Annual Subtotal, 3,005,000 Base II Annual Total Base 3,340,000 I + Base II

4 3. Additional Regional Technical Assessments, assuming full funding is provided for Base 1 and Base 2

Ozone Estimated Incremental Cost for Regional Ozone Studies, Assuming Base 1 and 2 Funding for Regional Haze Activity Cost Explanation, Other Explanation (Different or Information (Project supplemental data sets from Description) Haze) Emissions Inventory 270,000 EIF a (iii) (iv), c (i)- (Combined HG, NH) TOC 50+90+75+15+15+25 (iv), d (i)-(iv) (GHG recommend include GHG in a, b, c, FSEF a (iii), new EI) TAF a (i)(ii) Monitoring 100,000 100 TAF c (iii) (Combined HG, NH) Regional Modeling 250,000 250 TAF b (i)-(x) (Combined HG, NH) Other 350,000 EIF b (ii)-(iv), FSEF Control effectiveness, Source 10+40+ 25+275 b (i)-(iii), c (i) TAF a attribution, (Combined with (i)-(iv) HG, NH) Subtotal Additional 970,000 (combined Ozone with Hg and NOx dep.)

Mercury Estimated Incremental Cost for Regional Mercury Air Quality Analyses and Aquatic Deposition Studies, Assuming Base 1 and 2 Funding for Regional Haze Activity Cost Explanation, Other Explanation (Different or Information (Project supplemental data sets from Description) Haze) Emissions Inventory - EIF a (iii) (iv), c (i)- (Combined O3, NH) (iv), d (i)-(iv) (GHG a, b, c, FSEF a (ii), TAF a (i)(ii)

Monitoring - TAF c (iii) (Combined O3, NH) Regional Modeling - TAF b (i)-(x) TDAWG (Combined NH) 50,000 a Other - EIF b (ii)-(iv), FSEF b Control effectiveness, Source (i)-(iii), c (i) attribution, (Combined with O3, NH) Subtotal Additional 50,000 Mercury

5 NOx/Nitrate/Nitrogen Estimated Incremental Cost for Regional Nitrogen Analyses and Deposition Studies, Assuming Base 1 and 2 Funding for Regional Haze Activity Cost Explanation, Other Explanation (Different or Information (Project supplemental data sets from Description) Haze) Emissions Inventory - EIF a (iii) (iv), c (i)- (Combined O3, HG) TOC (iv), d (i)-(iv) (GHG a, recommend include GHG in b, c, FSEF a (ii), TAF a new EI (i)(ii) Monitoring - TAF c (iii) (Combined O3, HG Regional Modeling - TAF b (i)-(x), TDAWG (Combined O3, HG) a Other - EIF b (ii)-(iv), FSEF b Control effectiveness, Source (i)-(iii), c (i) attribution, (Combined with O3, HG) Subtotal Additional All combined with NOx dep. O3 and Hg TOTAL $970,000 ADDITIONAL INCREMENTS