Table S2. Effects of Defoliation Treatments on Clonal-Architecture-Related Traits. Treatment
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
1Table S2. Effects of defoliation treatments on clonal-architecture-related traits. Treatment as
2single factor was tested by non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis’ tests for number of connections
3and ANOVAs for total length of connections and mean internode length (data log-
4transformed). See table 3 for legend, no: non observed.
5 mean sd treatment effect treatment C treatment M treatment S A – Number of connections 2 Asto 16.5 8.1 16.8 8.0 25.5 10.9 H 30 = 4.52 ns a ab b 2 Cdiv 2.1 1.7 1.1 0.5 0.9 0.3 H 27 = 6.12 * a b b 2 Epal 4.1 3.3 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.4 H 28 = 13.09 ** a b b 2 Erep 7.0 3.1 3.3 1.7 3.6 2.2 H 30 = 11.79 ** 2 Gflu 2.3 2.3 1.6 1.2 0.7 1.0 H 29 = 4.43 ns 2 Jart 4.2 2.1 5.0 1.8 4.6 1.7 H 28 = 0.29 ns 2 Jger 1.7 1.0 1.1 0.3 1.0 0.5 H 25 = 3.24 ns 2 Rrep 2.8 1.1 2.6 1.7 3.6 1.0 H 27 = 3.95 ns a a b 2 Tfra 16.5 4.7 13.9 4.5 8.6 3.3 H 29 = 12.31 ** 2 Trep 27.7 8.5 25.1 7.0 19.3 7.6 H 28 = 5.05 ns B – Mean length of connections (cm) a b c 2 Asto 32.5 7.0 14.7 3.9 7.9 1.2 F 30 = 120.04 *** a ab b 2 Cdiv 4.3 1.7 3.3 1.3 2.3 1.1 F 24 = 5.31 * 2 Epal 8.4 3.0 10.1 3.4 8.8 8.9 F 25 = 1.25 ns 2 Erep 9.8 2.9 14.8 4.8 13.9 2.3 F 29 = 1.86 ns a b b 2 Gflu 19.4 5.9 10.6 2.6 9.0 0.2 F 19 = 17.02 *** 2 Jart 1.4 0.3 1.3 0.4 1.2 0.3 F 28 = 1.11 ns 2 Jger 2.2 1.5 2.6 1.7 2.2 0.5 F 25 = 0.26 ns 2 Rrep 42.7 15.4 41.6 20.6 44.0 11.3 F 27 = 0.22 ns 2 Tfra 9.9 2.7 9.7 2.2 9.4 2.2 F 29 = 0.11 ns 2 Trep 7.6 1.0 6.9 0.9 6.8 1.7 F 28 = 1.50 ns C – Mean inter-ramet distance (cm) a b b 2 Asto 4.6 1.5 2.5 0.5 2.1 0.3 F 30 = 29.89 *** a b b 2 Cdiv 1.1 0.6 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.2 F 24 = 9.98 *** 2 Epal 1.0 0.4 1.0 0.4 0.8 0.5 F 24 = 0.89 ns Erep no no no Gflu no no no 2 Jart 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.2 F 28 = 0.10 ns 2 Jger 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.3 F 22 = 1.27 ns 2 Rrep 9.3 3.7 9.1 2.0 8.7 1.5 F 27 = 0.07 ns 2 Tfra 1.8 0.6 1.9 0.8 1.5 0.3 F 29 = 1.42 ns a b b 2 Trep 1.8 0.2 1.3 1.2 1.1 0.3 F 28 = 21.69 ***
1 1