Review of the Potential of Seabird Colony Monitoring to Inform Monitoring Programmes for Consented Offshore Wind Farm Projects

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Review of the Potential of Seabird Colony Monitoring to Inform Monitoring Programmes for Consented Offshore Wind Farm Projects TITL BTO RESEARCH REPORT 712 Review of the potential of seabird colony monitoring to inform monitoring programmes for consented offshore wind farm projects. Cook, A.S.C.P., Humphreys, E.M., Robinson, R.A. & Burton, N.H.K. BTO Research Report No. 712 Review of the potential of seabird colony monitoring to inform monitoring programmes for consented offshore wind farm projects Authors Cook, A.S.C.P., Humphreys, E.M., Robinson, R.A. and Burton, N.H.K. Report of work carried out by the British Trust for Ornithology on behalf of the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy's offshore energy Strategic Environmental Assessment programme April 2019 British Trust for Ornithology The British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU Registered Charity No. 216652 British Trust for Ornithology British Trust for Ornithology Review of the Potential of Seabird Colony Monitoring to Inform Monitoring Programmes for Consented Offshore Wind Farm Projects BTO Research Report No. 712 Cook, A.S.C.P., Humphreys, E.M., Robinson, R.A. and Burton, N.H.K. Published in April 2019 by the British Trust for Ornithology The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk, IP24 2PU, UK Copyright British Trust for Ornithology 2019 ISBN 978-1-912642-07-6 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publishers CONTENTS Page No. LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................................... 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 5 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................ 9 1.2 Aims ......................................................................................................................................... 10 2. METHODS ................................................................................................................................. 11 2.1 Identifying Relevant SPAs and Feature Species ..................................................................... 11 2.2 Summarising Existing Demographic Monitoring and the Availability of Data to inform Population Models .................................................................................................................. 12 2.2.1 Abundance .................................................................................................................. 12 2.2.2 Breeding success ......................................................................................................... 12 2.2.3 Adult survival .............................................................................................................. 12 2.3 Assessing the statistical power to detect changes in demographic parameters .................. 13 2.3.1 Abundance .................................................................................................................. 13 2.3.2 Breeding success ......................................................................................................... 15 2.3.3 Adult survival .............................................................................................................. 16 3. RESULTS ................................................................................................................................... 19 3.1 Identifying Relevant SPAs and Feature Species ..................................................................... 19 3.2 Summarising Existing Demographic Monitoring and the Availability of Data to inform Population Models .................................................................................................................. 20 3.3 Species Results ........................................................................................................................ 20 3.3.1 Northern Fulmar Fulmarus glacialis .......................................................................... 20 3.3.2 Manx Shearwater Puffinus puffinus .......................................................................... 30 3.3.3 Northern Gannet Morus bassanus ............................................................................. 36 3.3.4 European Shag Phalacrocorax aristotelis .................................................................. 44 3.3.5 Black-legged Kittiwake Rissa tridactyla ..................................................................... 50 3.3.6 Lesser Black-backed Gull Larus fuscus ....................................................................... 58 3.3.7 Herring Gull Larus argentatus .................................................................................... 66 3.3.8 Great Black-backed Gull Larus marinus ..................................................................... 74 3.3.9 Sandwich Tern Sterna sandvicensis ........................................................................... 80 3.3.10 Common Tern Sterna hirundo .................................................................................... 87 3.3.11 Arctic Tern Sterna paradisaea .................................................................................... 93 3.3.12 Arctic Skua Stercorarius parasiticus ......................................................................... 100 3.3.13 Great Skua Stercorarius skua ................................................................................... 105 3.3.14 Common Guillemot Uria aalge ................................................................................ 111 3.3.15 Razorbill Alca torda .................................................................................................. 119 3.3.16 Atlantic Puffin Fratercula arctica ............................................................................. 128 Research Report No: 712 April 2019 1 Page No. 4. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................. 135 4.1 Discussion .............................................................................................................................. 135 4.2 Recommendations ................................................................................................................ 140 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 144 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................ 145 APPENDIX 1......................................................................................................................................... 149 Research Report No: 712 April 2019 2 LIST OF TABLES Page No. Table 2.2.1 Demographic parameters of seabird species monitored by the Seabird Monitoring Programme and the extent to which they feed into national indicators ...................................................................................................... 13 Table 2.3.1 Scenarios considered for capture-mark-recapture studies at seabird breeding colonies that were used to generate estimates of adult survival .............................. 18 Table 4.1.1 Number of Special Protections Areas for each species at which LSEs associated with the impacts of offshore wind farms could not be ruled out by the HRA screening process and at which current monitoring programmes have sufficient power to detect at 25% or 50% decline in abundance and/or breeding success .... 137 Table A1 List of offshore wind farms considered in this report .............................................. 149 Table A2 Species features of Special Protection Areas for which a Likely Significant Effect (LSE) could not be ruled out by the Habitats Regulations Assessment or Appraisal (HRA) screening process for offshore wind farms considered in this report ................................................................................................................. 151 Table A3 Species features of Special Protection Areas for which a Likely Significant Effect (LSE) could not be ruled out by the Habitats Regulations Assessment or Appraisal (HRA) screening process for offshore wind farms considered in this report and the associated effects for which LSEs were predicted .................... 155 Table A4 Species features of Special Protection Areas for which a Likely Significant Effect (LSE) could not be ruled out by the Habitats Regulations Assessment or Appraisal (HRA) screening process for offshore wind farms considered in this report and the existing monitoring of abundance, breeding success and survival of these species’ populations .............................................................. 160 Research Report No: 712 April 2019 3 Research Report No: 712 April 2019 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. To inform the consenting process, the potential impacts on seabird populations of the key effects associated with renewable energy developments are assessed through an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). When preparing applications for Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIPs) in England or Wales, or for equivalent
Recommended publications
  • Habitats and Species Surveys in the Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters: Updated October 2016
    TOPIC SHEET NUMBER 34 V3 SOUTH RONALDSAY Along the eastern coast of the island at 30m the HABITATS AND SPECIES SURVEYS IN THE PENTLAND videos revealed a seabed of coarse sand and scoured rocky outcrops. The sand was inhabited FIRTH AND ORKNEY WATERS by echinoderms and crustaceans, while the rock was generally bare with sparse Alcyonium digitatum (Dead men’s fi nger) and numerous DUNCANSBY HEAD PAPA WESTRAY WESTRAY Echinus esculentus. Dense brittlestar beds were The seabed recorded to the south of Duncansby SANDAY found to the south. Further north at a depth Head is fl at bedrock with patches of sand, of 50 m the seabed took the form of a mosaic cobbles and boulders. The rock surface is quite ROUSAY MAINLAND STRONSAY of rippled sand, bedrock and boulders with bare other than dense patches of red algae, ORKNEY occasional hydroids and bryozoans. clumps of hydroids and dense brittlestar beds. SCAPA FLOW HOY COPINSAY SOUTH RONALDSAY PENTLAND FIRTH STROMA DUNCANSBY HEAD CAITHNESS VIDEO AND PHOTOGRAPH SITES IN SOUTHERN PART OF ANEMONES URTICINA FELINA ON TIDESWEPT SURVEYED AREA CIRCALITTORAL ROCK Introduction mussels off Copinsay, also found off Noss Head. An extensive coverage of loose-lying Data availability References Marine Scotland Science has been collecting red alga was found in the east of Scapa Flow video and photographic stills from the Pentland The biotope classifi cations and the underlying Moore, C.G. (2009). Preliminary assessment of the on muddy sand and sandeels were also found Firth and Orkney Islands as part of a wider video and images are all available through conservation importance of benthic epifaunal species off west Hoy.
    [Show full text]
  • Cruising the ISLANDS of ORKNEY
    Cruising THE ISLANDS OF ORKNEY his brief guide has been produced to help the cruising visitor create an enjoyable visit to TTour islands, it is by no means exhaustive and only mentions the main and generally obvious anchorages that can be found on charts. Some of the welcoming pubs, hotels and other attractions close to the harbour or mooring are suggested for your entertainment, however much more awaits to be explored afloat and many other delights can be discovered ashore. Each individual island that makes up the archipelago offers a different experience ashore and you should consult “Visit Orkney” and other local guides for information. Orkney waters, if treated with respect, should offer no worries for the experienced sailor and will present no greater problem than cruising elsewhere in the UK. Tides, although strong in some parts, are predictable and can be used to great advantage; passage making is a delight with the current in your favour but can present a challenge when against. The old cruising guides for Orkney waters preached doom for the seafarer who entered where “Dragons and Sea Serpents lie”. This hails from the days of little or no engine power aboard the average sailing vessel and the frequent lack of wind amongst tidal islands; admittedly a worrying combination when you’ve nothing but a scrap of canvas for power and a small anchor for brakes! Consult the charts, tidal guides and sailing directions and don’t be afraid to ask! You will find red “Visitor Mooring” buoys in various locations, these are removed annually over the winter and are well maintained and can cope with boats up to 20 tons (or more in settled weather).
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for a Marine Act for Scotland the Tangle of the Forth
    The Case for a Marine Act for Scotland The Tangle of the Forth © WWF Scotland For more information contact: WWF Scotland Little Dunkeld Dunkeld Perthshire PH8 0AD t: 01350 728200 f: 01350 728201 The Case for a Marine Act for Scotland wwf.org.uk/scotland COTLAND’S incredibly Scotland’s territorial rich marine environment is waters cover 53 per cent of Designed by Ian Kirkwood Design S one of the most diverse in its total terrestrial and marine www.ik-design.co.uk Europe supporting an array of wildlife surface area Printed by Woods of Perth and habitats, many of international on recycled paper importance, some unique to Scottish Scotland’s marine and WWF-UK registered charity number 1081274 waters. Playing host to over twenty estuarine environment A company limited by guarantee species of whales and dolphins, contributes £4 billion to number 4016274 the world’s second largest fish - the Scotland’s £64 billion GDP Panda symbol © 1986 WWF – basking shark, the largest gannet World Wide Fund for Nature colony in the world and internationally 5.5 million passengers and (formerly World Wildlife Fund) ® WWF registered trademark important numbers of seabirds and seals 90 million tonnes of freight Scotland’s seas also contain amazing pass through Scottish ports deepwater coral reefs, anemones and starfish. The rugged coastline is 70 per cent of Scotland’s characterised by uniquely varied habitats population of 5 million live including steep shelving sea cliffs, sandy within 0km of the coast and beaches and majestic sea lochs. All of 20 per cent within km these combined represent one of Scotland’s greatest 25 per cent of Scottish Scotland has over economic and aesthetic business, accounting for 11,000km of coastline, assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerial Survey of Northern Gannet (Morus Bassanus) Colonies Off NW Scotland 2013
    Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 696 Aerial survey of northern gannet (Morus bassanus) colonies off NW Scotland 2013 COMMISSIONED REPORT Commissioned Report No. 696 Aerial survey of northern gannet (Morus bassanus) colonies off NW Scotland 2013 For further information on this report please contact: Andy Douse Scottish Natural Heritage Great Glen House INVERNESS IV3 8NW Telephone: 01463 725000 E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Wanless, S., Murray, S. & Harris, M.P. 2015. Aerial survey of northern gannet (Morus bassanus) colonies off NW Scotland 2013. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 696. This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. The views expressed by the author(s) of this report should not be taken as the views and policies of Scottish Natural Heritage. © Scottish Natural Heritage 2015. COMMISSIONED REPORT Summary Aerial survey of northern gannet (Morus bassanus) colonies off NW Scotland 2013 Commissioned Report No. 696 Project No: 14641 Contractor: Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Year of publication: 2015 Keywords Northern gannet; Sula Sgeir; St Kilda; Flannan Islands; Sule Stack: Sule Skerry; gugas; population trends. Background Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) commissioned an aerial survey of selected colonies of northern gannets (Morus bassanus) off the NW coast of Scotland in 2013. The principal aim was to assess the status of the population in this region, which holds some important, but infrequently counted colonies (St Kilda, Sula Sgeir, Sule Stack, Flannan Islands and Sule Skerry). In addition, an up-to-date assessment was required to review the basis for the licensed taking of young gannets (gugas) from the island of Sula Main findings Aerial surveys of all five colonies were successfully carried out on 18 and 19 June 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Medicine
    HISTORY OF MEDICINE The air-ambulance: Orkney's experience R. A. COLLACOTT, MA, DM, PH.D, MRCGP RCGP History of General Practice Research Fellow; formerly General Practitioner, Isle of Westray, Orkney Islands SUMMARY. The paramount problem for the de- isolated medical service. Patients could be transferred livery of the medical services in the Orkneys has between islands and from the islands to mainland been that of effective transport. The develop- Scotland. It became easier for general practitioners to ment of an efficient air-ambulance service has obtain the assistance of colleagues in other islands, had a major impact on medical care. The service which led to more effective specialist services in the started in 1934, but was abolished at the outset of main island townships of Kirkwall in the Orkney Isles, the Second World War and did not recommence Stornoway in the Hebrides and Lerwick in the Shetland until 1967. This paper examines the evolution of Isles. The air-ambulance made attending regional cen- the air-ambulance service in the Orkney Islands, tres such as Aberdeen easier and more comfortable for and describes alternative proposals for the use of patients than the conventional, slower journey by boat: aircraft in this region. for example, the St Ola steamer took four to five hours to sail between Kirkwall and Wick via Thurso whereas the plane took only 35 minutes; furthermore, patients Introduction often became more ill as a result of the sea journey alone, the Pentland Firth being notorious for its stormy UNLIKE the other groups of Scottish islands, the I Orkney archipelago a of seas.
    [Show full text]
  • Screening for Likely Significant Effects
    Argyll Array Offshore Wind Farm: Habitat Regulations Assessment – Screening for Likely Significant Effects 14 May 2014 Project Number: SGP6346 RPS 7 Clairmont Gardens Glasgow G3 7LW Tel: 0141 332 0373 Fax: 0141 332 3182 Email: [email protected] rpsgroup.com QUALITY MANAGEMENT Prepared by: Name: Rafe Dewar Title: Senior Ecologist Signature Authorised by: Name: Martin Scott Title: Principal Ornithologist Signature: Current Status: Draft for Comment Issue Date: 14 May 2014 Revision Number: 4 Revision Notes: - Project File Path: J:\SGP 6346 - Scottish Power Argyll Array Birds\Reports\Reports in Progress\ This report has been prepared within the RPS Planning and Development Quality Management System to British Standard EN ISO 9001 : 2008 COPYRIGHT © RPS The material presented in this report is confidential. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of ScottishPower Renewables and shall not be distributed or made available to any other company or person without the knowledge and written consent of ScottishPower Renewables or RPS. rpsgroup.com REPORT TEMPLATE TYPE: Planning ISSUE DATE: 18 May 2011 REVISION NUMBER: - REVISION DATE: - rpsgroup.com CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 The Project ............................................................................................................................................ 1 The Habitat Regulations Requirements ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SCOTTISH BIRDS .LJ~ ~{I;JJJ /~ / \
    ISSN 0036-9144 SCOTTISH BIRDS .LJ~ ~{i;JJJ /~ / \ " ~(/ . ~ --';y '<-~ THE JOURNAL OF THE SCOTTISH ORNITHOLOGISTS' CLUB Vol. 11 No. 8 WINTER 1981 ~~- GATEWAY TO A WORLD OF INTEREST Opens for the appreciative and enquiring traveller, a series of holidays venturing through areas rich in natural history and historical significance. Our 1982 ornithological brochure is now available and includes the following desinations : January California March Texas April Holland, Gibraltar, Crete, Camargue, Japan May South-West USA June Holland, Finland July Alaska, Switzerland August Peru September Gibraltar, Camargue, New England October Australia November South Africa December Falkland Islands These tours are specially organised for those who enjoy Ornithology, Natural History, etc. FOR FULL DETAILS OF THE ABOVE TOURS AND ANY OTHER SPECIALISED TRAVEL, APPLY TO mIS TOURS (ARRANGED BY FURNESS TRAVEL LTD., A MEMBER OF THE FURNESS WITHY GROUP) 148 GLOUCESTER ROAD NORTH, FILTON, BRISTOL. TELEPHONE (0272) 791172 & i950liO Telex 449840 ATOL 543BC THE CUCKOO lan Wyllie Using the personal experience and observation of many years, and with the aid of the researches of many other scientists, Ian Wyllie has written a comprehensive study of the cuckoo .throughout the world. The evolution of the parasitic method of reproduction has long aroused scientific interest and possible explanations are discussed in relation to the European and other parasitic cuckoos as well as the world's other brood parasites. Including as it does numerous previously unpublished photographs, The Cuckoo is a much-needed source of reliable information on a bird which puzzles and fascinates ornithologists and amateur bird watchers alike. 176 pages 15 colour photographs ·35 black and white photographs £8.95 ~ B A'TSFORD 4 Fitzhardinge Street, .WW fi London WIH OAH WILDliFE IN TOE ARCTIC ENJOY the thrill of seeing rare wildlife in the Arctic for 2/3 weeks in the summer of 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • Isle of May NNR Expedition Pack Contents
    Isle of May NNR Expedition Pack Contents Section 1 - Introduction Page Map 2 The Isle of May 3 Aims Of The Pack 3 How To Use This Pack 4 Section 2 - Expedition Planning 5 Introduction 6 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 6 - 8 Ground Rules 8 - 9 Pre Visit Activities 9 - 10 Quick Games 10 - 12 Island Activity Programmes 12 - 13 Section 3 - Expedition Jewel Of The Forth 14 - 78 Section 4 - Expedition Island Of Lost Souls 79 - 123 Section 5 - Curriculum Links 124 - 133 Section 6 - The Story Of The May 134 - 153 Section 7 - Seabird Fact Files 154 - 168 Section 8 - Resources 169 - 173 Isle of May NNR Expedition Pack Introduction Section 1: Introduction - welcome to the Isle of May Isle of May NNR Expedition Pack 1 Introduction The Isle of May The Isle of May lies at the mouth of the Firth of Forth about five miles from Anstruther. A National Nature Reserve (NNR) since 1956, the May is the largest island in the Firth and home to vast numbers of seabirds and seals, making it an internationally important site for wildlife. The long history of the island has included hunters and farmers, saints and pirates, warriors and scientists. Today the only people living on the island are researchers and SNH staff who welcome around 7,000 visitors to the island each summer. Everyone who lives around the coast of the Forth should at some time visit the Isle of May and experience the mystery and grandeur of this magnificent island - the Jewel of the Forth. Aims of this Pack Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) has produced this pack as a resource to help teachers and leaders wishing to make use of the Isle of May as an educational resource.
    [Show full text]
  • SNH Commissioned Report 628: the Scottish Gannet Survey 2004
    Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 628 The Scottish gannet survey 2004 COMMISSIONED REPORT Commissioned Report No. 628 The Scottish gannet survey 2004 For further information on this report please contact: Andy Douse Scottish Natural Heritage Great Glen House INVERNESS IV3 8NW Telephone: 01463 725000 E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Wanless, S., Murray, S., Harris, M.P. & Evans, S. 2015. The Scottish gannet survey 2004. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 628. This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. The views expressed by the author(s) of this report should not be taken as the views and policies of Scottish Natural Heritage. © Scottish Natural Heritage 2015. COMMISSIONED REPORT Summary The Scottish gannet survey 2004 Commissioned Report No. 628 Project No: F04AC301 Contractor: Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Year of publication: 2015 Keywords Gannet; Site Condition Monitoring; SPA; Sula Sgeir. Background Scotland’s Special Protection Areas (SPAs) support 80% of the British breeding population of northern gannets Morus bassanus. There are 15 ‘aggregations of breeding birds’ features that are notified for gannet in Scotland, seven of which are on SSSIs and eight on SPAs. Site condition monitoring is carried out on a six-year rolling programme. The gannet had low priority in Seabird 2000 and no counts were made of the three largest colonies, nor was Sula Sgeir, the site of the annual guga hunt, counted. This contract aimed to: assess numbers and conservation status, list any threats and establish survey protocols for gannet colonies on Bass Rock, Sule Skerry, Sule Stack, Sula Sgeir, Flannan Isles, St Kilda, Ailsa Craig and Scare Rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Tcm9-289385.Pdf
    Yell Ramna Stacks & Gruney Fetlar Mousa Loch of Spiggie Sumburgh Head Noup Cliffs North Hill Birsay Moors Trumland The Loons and Loch of Banks Onziebust Mill Dam Marwick Head Brodgar Cottasgarth & Rendall Moss Copinsay Hoy Hobbister Durness Dunnet Head Eilean Hoan Broubster Leans Loch na Muilne Forsinard Flows Priest Island Troup Head Vallay Edderton Sands Balranald Nigg and Udale Bays Ardmore Culbin Sands Loch of Strathbeg Fairy Glen Loch Ruthven Meikle Loch Eileanan Dubha Corrimony Ballinlaggan RSPB Abernethy Insh Marshes The Crannach Fowlsheugh Coll Glenborrodale RESERVES The Reef Loch of Kinnordy Skinflats Tay Inversnaid Colonsay Vane Farm 2011 Oronsay Inner Clyde Fidra Fannyside Smaull Farm Lochwinnoch Inchmickery Loch Gruinart/Ardnave Baron’s Haugh The Oa Horse Island Bogside Flats Aird’s Moss Rathlin Ailsa Craig Coquet Island Lough Foyle Ken-Dee Marshes Wood of Cree Kirkconnell Merse Crook of Baldoon Campfield Marsh Larne Lough Islands Mersehead Geltsdale Belfast Lough Lower Lough Erne Islands Portmore Lough Mull of Galloway & Scar Rocks Saltholme Haweswater St Bees Head Aghatirourke Strangford Bay & Sandy Island Lyth Valley Hodbarrow Leighton Moss & Morecambe Bay Bempton Cliffs Carlingford Lough Islands Hesketh Out Marsh Fairburn Ings Marshside Read’s Island Blacktoft Sands The Skerries Dove Stone Tetney Marshes Valley Wetlands DearneV alley – Old Moor and Bolton Ings South Stack Cliffs Dee Estuary Beckingham Marshes Conwy Eastern Moors Malltraeth Marsh Langford Lowfields Morfa Dinlle Coombes & Churnet Valleys Freiston Shore Titchwell
    [Show full text]
  • A Census of the Atlantic Puffins Fratercula Arctica Breeding on Orkney in 2016
    A census of Atlantic Puffins on Orkney A Census of the Atlantic Puffins Fratercula arctica breeding on Orkney in 2016 Robert D. Hughes1*, Fabrice Le Bouard1, Gareth Bradbury2 and Ellie Owen1 * Correspondence author. Email: [email protected] 1 The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, North Scotland Regional Office, Etive House, Beechwood Park, Inverness, IV2 3BW, UK; 2 The Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust, Slimbridge, GL2 7BT, UK. Abstract Atlantic Puffins Fratercula arctica were counted at all known colonies in Orkney (excluding Sule Skerry) during the 2016 breeding season. Counts of individuals (IND) were made during pre-laying and incubation at all 20 sites and at six sites where burrows where physically accessible. In 2016 the Atlantic Puffin population of Orkney was estimated to be 6,675 breeding pairs (based on the counts of apparently occupied burrows [AOB] where available, and assuming that one individual represented one breeding pair for the other sites). AOB counts were higher than the IND counts at all six colonies where both methods were used. Previous Orkney Atlantic Puffin population estimates of breeding pairs were mostly based on counts of individuals on land (INDL) made during late incubation and chick rearing. While caution must be used when comparing INDL counts between years the results suggest a decline in line with studies of other Northern Isles colonies. Introduction The Atlantic Puffin Fratercula arctica (hereafter ‘Puffin’) is a rocky crevice and burrow nesting seabird, whose range is restricted to the cold waters of the North Atlantic (Harris & Wanless 2011). Due to the Puffins’ nesting habits, often in remote or inaccessible locations, accurately determining their population size is difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • A6359 Findynate Estate
    44 A RCHERFIELD DIRLETON , N ORTH BERWICK 44 A RCHERFIELD DIRLETON, NORTH BERWICK, EH39 5HT DIRLETON 2.5 MILES, GULLANE 2.9 MILES, NORTH BERWICK 4.5 MILES, EDINBURGH 24 MILES, EDINBURGH AIRPORT 32 MILES Magnificent conteMporary Mansion house with far reaching views to the firth of forth, set in extensive landscaped gardens within the prestigious archerfield estate Vestibule, Reception Hall, Drawing Room, Dining Room, Study, Cloakroom, WC, Open Plan Family Kitchen with Dining and Seating Areas, Family Room Master Suite with Dressing Room and En Suite, 4 Further En Suite Bedrooms Attic Playroom/Cinema Self-Contained Apartment with Two Bedrooms, Bathroom, Open Plan Kitchen, Dining and Sitting Room Four Car Garage. Laundry Room. Gardener’s WC Landscaped Gardens and Woodland EPC Rating = C About 4 acres in all situation 44 Archerfield is set in four acres of land within the historic Archerfield Estate. The house sits on the largest plot on the development and is set slightly apart from the remaining development, flanking the 14th fairway of the Fidra Links golf course, giving uninterrupted views over Yellowcraigs beach and Fidra island, with Fife and the Isle of May on the horizon. The Village is a fully established modern development in the beautiful coastal countryside of East Lothian, between Gullane and Dirleton. Lying just east of the famous Muirfield Links, home to the Honourable Company of Edinburgh Golfers, and nearby Gullane, Luffness and North Berwick golf courses, the Estate has its own rich golfing history, with the first game taking place here in 1868, and an 18 hole course created in 1910.
    [Show full text]