III. BACS Operations Manual Provisional Endorsement (William Green)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Operational IT Committee 3:00 – 4:00 p.m., July 22, FAC 228D
I. Outgoing Email Task Force – Proposal (Mike
Horn) II. Zero-Based Budget – Brief (Brad Englert)
III. BACS Operations Manual – Provisional Endorsement (William Green)
IV. Administrative Systems Modernization Program – Update (Renee Wallace)
BSC 7/3, 1:30-3:00
No Meeting
7/17, 1:30-2:30 ASMP Steering Committee (Renee Wallace) AIC 7/10, 9:00-10:30
*Two-Factor Authentication (Cam Beasley, C.W. Belcher) *Spring Office 365 Migration - Update (Sabina Winters) *Help Desk as a Service (Sandra Germenis)
R&E 7/29, 11:00-4:00
LIFT Selection OIT 7/22, 3:00-4:00
*Outgoing Email Task Force (Mike Horn) *Zero-Based Budget (Brad Englert) *BACS Strategy (William Green) *ASMP (Renee Wallace) C-13
No Meeting C-14
No Meeting SITAB August 28, 9:00-10:00 a.m. Stark Library
*Zero-Based Budget (Brad Englert) *Network Architecture Changes (William Green) *Technical Support Contact Certification Update (Sandra Germemis, Cam Beasley) *LIFT Update (Brad Englert, Christy Tran) Outgoing Email / Marketing Email Task Force
Problem Statement
Across the colleges, schools, and departments, the University sends out millions of marketing emails every day to our alumni, former students, visitors, and donors The function of outgoing emails is completely decentralized which causes the following problems: o Multiple software tools and services are being used, likely leading to wasted resources and spending along with possible risk for fraud and abuse o Multiple email lists exist, making it impossible for any user to know what emails they are subscribed to and impossible to unsubscribe universally, which may be a violation of the CAN SPAM Act of 2003 o No central email calendar exists, leading to users receiving multiple, disconnected emails from campus on the same day Proposal
Establish a task force, sponsored by OIT and the President’s Office, to investigate the problem and recommend further action if necessary
Key Next Steps and Timeline
Get approval from OIT to establish task force Name a Chair and Co-Chair, establish membership Request any and all contracts across campus for outgoing email tools and services from Business Contracts team
Establish a definitive list of all email tools and services, their source of record for email address data, cost for the service, resources used to send emails, and the number of annual emails being sent (approximate) Survey interest and challenges for a campus-wide outgoing email service Establish guidelines, policies, and processes for a centralized outgoing email service Investigate possible implications for Regroup with proposed solutions Recommend proposed solutions and next steps to OIT Information Technology Services (ITS) Zero-Based Budget – Brief
In 2009, the Strategic IT Advisory Committee asked ITS to develop a zero-based budget. The goal of the zero-based budget was to evaluate and prioritize the projects and services of the organization and to make the organization more transparent. Before a new service was added, that service was evaluated in terms of the services currently offered and the limited and set resources available. Rates for services were evaluated in terms of the cost of service and offered at a competitive rates (set by the CFO’s rate setting team) that are posted and easily accessible. ITS engaged in continual improvement and held conversations with campus to understand if services could be delivered better, more cost effective, and faster.
From fiscal years 2009 to 2013, 44 services have been introduced and more than 30 services have been retired.
Some Highlights: • Funds recovered from Office of the CIO staffing changes were redirected toward services and improved service delivery. • Applications saved and redirected funds from identity management and authentication to staff education programs and new authentication and authorization services. • Customer Service and Support Services redirected funds from central-only based customer services to contracting with departments to support managed help desk services for multiple campus units. • The Information Security Office worked with units to trim costs in monitoring and protecting several individual services, transitioning those services to more central services that are more easily monitored and protected. • Networking and Telecommunications Services redirected several million dollars from phone services to VoIP and building security services and network upgrades. • Systems redirected savings from Blackboard to Canvas, our new learning management system, and several items associated with the eventual decommissioning of the mainframe to UNIX storage, virtual machines, and software licenses. • The balance of funds for the Data Centers come from central funding, co-location fees, and retirement of a small number of services.
Over the past five fiscal years, ITS added new services, addressed growth, and increased value in the face of a constant-level budget.
A detailed report will be available and posted to the CIO website in August of 2015.
ITS Zero-Based Budget – Brief 1 BAC S O p e ra t i o n s M a n u a l – E n d o r s e
Overview The Building Access Control and Security (BACS) Operations Manual codifies how those systems are managed and supported at the university.
Specifics An IT Governance Business Services Committee (BSC) Task Force made up of Campus Safety,
Liberal Arts, McCombs, Moody, Natural Sciences and ITS oversaw development of this manual, along with review and requirements from the Information Security Office and Office of Internal Audit. Key points include:
1. Security standards, requirements and oversight are defined for different types of spaces
2. Campus Safety is the owner and ultimate decider for BACS services
3. Governance is through BSC and Campus Safety and Security Committee
4. ITS is responsible for operations, in consultation with applicable University Operations units as noted
5. Units have responsibilities for operations of delegated components
6. BACS is supported primary through fees:
a. Units requiring security fund that security
b. External door support, not installation, is provided as a Common Good
c. False alarm fees are instituted to ensure proper usage
7. Financial impact: new construction/renovation must adhere to new classifications, or as required by authority (e.g. Audit, EH&S, ISO)
Governance version: h t t p s: / / u t exas . b ox. c o m/ s/ y 6 3 9 0 k n m b w p 8 7 4 5 6g j ep
(final version will be published on CIO site once fully approved)
BSC V 1.1 July 16, 2015