DOCSLIB.ORG

Regulatory Framework Examplesdocument of Good Legal Practice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regulatory Framework Examplesdocument of Good Legal Practice Bringing Organisations & Network Development to higher levels in the Farming sector in Europe www.bondproject.eu BOND PROJECT New Solutions for Collective Action REGULATORY FRAMEWORK EXAMPLESDOCUMENT OF GOOD LEGAL PRACTICE the future of europe’s Foods & Landscapes BOND Regulatory Framework Report Best Legal Practice for Small Farmers prepared by Kisléptékű Termékelőállítók és Szolgáltatók Országos Egyesülete Hungary November 30, 2019 Edited: Andrea Szabadkai Ágnes Major Katalin Kujáni Authors: Andrea Szabadkai Katalin Kujáni Ibolya Lámfalusi Péter Kajner Ágnes Major Flóra Orosz Dorottya Szabó Author of Chapter II: Ibolya Lámfalusi Contributed: Dávid Abonyi Gézáné Jancsó Report was finished on November 30, 2019 Responsibility for the information and views set out in this report lies entirely with the authors. This report is part of the BOND project that has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement No. 774208. 2 Table of Content I. Executive summary .................................................................................................................................. 5 II. Sustainable farming ............................................................................................................................ 10 II.1 Promotion of cooperation by setting a broad definition of family farming and agricultural activities ....................................................................................................................................................... 11 II.1.1 Austria ........................................................................................................................................................................ 11 II.1.2 Croatia ........................................................................................................................................................................ 12 II.1.3 Italy ............................................................................................................................................................................... 13 II.1.4 Poland ....................................................................................................................................................................... 14 II.1.5 Portugal ................................................................................................................................................................... 14 II.1.6 Romania .................................................................................................................................................................. 14 II.2 Preferential tax terms relating to agricultural activities .............................................................. 15 II.2.1 Austria ....................................................................................................................................................................... 16 II.2.2 Croatia ...................................................................................................................................................................... 16 II.2.3 Czech Republic .................................................................................................................................................. 17 II.2.4 France ....................................................................................................................................................................... 17 II.2.5 Hungary ................................................................................................................................................................... 17 II.2.6 Moldova .................................................................................................................................................................. 19 II.2.7 Norway .................................................................................................................................................................... 19 II.2.8 Poland ...................................................................................................................................................................... 20 II.2.9 Romania .................................................................................................................................................................. 20 II.2.10 Slovakia ................................................................................................................................................................ 20 II.2.11 Slovenia .................................................................................................................................................................. 21 II.3 Supporting start-ups ............................................................................................................................................... 21 II.3.1 Austria ........................................................................................................................................................................ 21 II.3.2 France ....................................................................................................................................................................... 21 II.3.3 Poland ...................................................................................................................................................................... 22 II.3.4. Romania ................................................................................................................................................................. 22 II.3.5 Slovakia ................................................................................................................................................................... 22 II.3.6 United Kingdom ............................................................................................................................................... 22 III. Legislations facilitating access to markets ............................................................................ 23 III.1 Cooperatives .......................................................................................................................................................... 23 III.2 Competition law and agricultural cooperation ................................................................................. 29 III.3 Other good practices on cooperation between agricultural producers in the sales of their products .................................................................................................................................................. 30 III.3.1 Austria ...................................................................................................................................................................... 32 III.3.2 France ..................................................................................................................................................................... 32 3 III.3.3 Italy ............................................................................................................................................................................ 33 III.3.4 Romania ................................................................................................................................................................ 35 III.4 Joint action for local and traditional foods .......................................................................................... 35 III.5 Flexibility in hygiene regulations ................................................................................................................. 37 III.5.1 Czech Republic ................................................................................................................................................ 43 III.5.2 Croatia ..................................................................................................................................................................... 43 III.5.3 France ..................................................................................................................................................................... 43 III.5.4 Hungary ................................................................................................................................................................. 48 III.5.5 Norway .................................................................................................................................................................. 50 III.5.6 Poland .................................................................................................................................................................... 51 III.5.7 Portugal ................................................................................................................................................................. 52 III.5.8 Romania ................................................................................................................................................................ 52 III.5.9 Slovakia ................................................................................................................................................................. 53 III.5.10 Spain .....................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Monthly Bulletin European Documentation
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF PARLIAMENTARY DOCUMENTATION AND INFORMATION MONTHLY BULLETIN OF EUROPEAN DOCUMENTATION .. lU 0.. Seventh Year July 1965 C 0 N T E N T S •====·=-----==== P a r t I DEVELOPMENT OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION page I. GENERAL PROBLEMS 3 1. The breakdown in the Brussels negotiations and its sequel • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • . • . • . • • • • • • • • . • • • . • • • 3 2. General de Gaulle's visit to Bonn,,,........... 4 3. Mrs. K~te Strobel discusses the financial future of the EEC •.................................... 5 4. An appeal by the "Europa-Union" to the Bundestag 6 5. German Bar Conference in Augsbur~ .•.••.•.•••••• 7 6. Italian university teachers and the European University . • . • • • . • • • . • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • . • • • • . 8 7. Statement by the European Federal Movement ••••• 10 8. European problems debated on Italian television 11 II. ECONOMIC POLICY AND ECONOMIC SECTORS ...•.••••••••• 13 1. The Common Market and International Monetary Questions . • • • • • • • . • • • . • • . • • • . • . • • . • . • . • . 13 2. The Eighth General Report on Euratom's activi- ties discussed in Rome by Professor Carelli •••• 15 3. A conference of European miners in Italy .•••••• 16 4. The Italian Minister for Agriculture on relations with the EEC .••••••• ~ . • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • . • • • • . • • • 17 5. Italian agriculture and EEC policy............. 18 6. The railway executives of the Six on the common transport policy ••••••.•••••••••• ~............. 20 III. EXTERNAL RELATIONS . •
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability and Organic Farming in the Light of Conventions Theory
    Master´s Thesis, 30 credits Sustainable Enterprising Master´s programme 2008/10, 120 credits Sustainability and organic farming in the light of conventions theory The example of the Hungarian organic sector Orsolya Erdélyi Stockholm University Stockholm Resilience Centre Sustainable Enterprising Master’s Programme Sustainability and organic farming in the light of conventions theory The example of the Hungarian organic sector by Orsolya Erdélyi Supervisor: Ulf Jonsson, Professor at the Economic History Department, Stockholm University Master’s Thesis 30 ECTS Spring term 2010 I Abstract The globalization and industrialization of food sector created a need for food traceability. Alternative food networks, such as organic farming, can serve this purpose by offering an alternative to the conventional food and by regaining the trust between the producer and the consumer. Organic agriculture is assumed to be more sustainable than the industrial one. However, there is a misconception of the concepts “sustainable agriculture” and “organic farming”. In Hungary the contradiction of high export of organic raw materials and high import of processed organic food from the main export countries was experienced in the 1990s. But lately the import volume decreased, and the high export remained combined with low domestic organic consumption. It is important to see how the actors involved in the organic sector perceive the sustainability of the Hungarian organic sector. The research question is: How do different actors perceive sustainability in the Hungarian organic food sector in the light of conventions theory? In order to find the answer 10 actors with different profiles were interviewed. Semi- structured qualitative interviews were carried out.
    [Show full text]
  • AKIS and Advisory Services in Italy Report for the AKIS Inventory (WP3)
    AKIS and advisory services in Italy Report for the AKIS inventory (WP3) of the PRO AKIS project May 2014 Author Monica Caggiano French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA) Contact: [email protected] This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 311994. Please reference this report as follows: Caggiano, M. (2014): AKIS and advisory services in Italy. Report for the AKIS inventory (WP3) of the PRO AKIS project. Online resource: www.proakis.eu/publicationsandevents/pubs 2 Executive summary The main aim of the report is to provide a comprehensive description of the Agricultural Knowledge and Information System (AKIS) in Italy, with a particular focus on agricultural advisory services. The description includes history, policy, funding, advisory methods and a section on how the Farm Advisory System (FAS) was implemented. This report represents an output of the PRO AKIS project (Prospects for Farmers’ Support: Advisory Services in the European Agricultural Knowledge and Information Systems’). It is one of 27 country reports that were produced in 2013 by project partners and subcontractors for compiling an inventory of Agricultural Knowledge and Information Systems. AKIS describe the exchange of knowledge and supporting services between many diverse actors from the first, second or third sector in rural areas. AKIS provide farmers with relevant knowledge and networks around innovations in agriculture. Findings from the 27 country reports were presented at three regional workshops across Europe in February and March 2014, discussed with stakeholders and experts, and subsequent feedback was integrated into the reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Largest Advertising Agency Trade Association
    1 of 148 U.S. Department of State FY 2001 Country Commercial Guide: Italy The Country Commercial Guide for Italy was prepared by U.S. Embassy Rome and released by the Bureau of Economic and Business in July 2000 for Fiscal Year 2001. International Copyright, U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service and the U.S. Department of State, 2000. All rights reserved outside the United States. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY II. ECONOMIC TRENDS AND OUTLOOK Major Trends and Outlook Economic Trends for Agriculture Principal Growth Sectors Government Role in the Economy Balance of Payments Situation Infrastructure III. POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT Nature of Political Relationship with the United States Major Political Issues Affecting Business Climate Brief Synopsis of Political System / Major Political Parties Political Environment for Agriculture IV. MARKETING U.S. PRODUCTS AND SERVICES Distribution and Sales Channels Use of Agents/Distributors; Finding a Partner Franchising 2 of 148 Direct Marketing Leasing Joint Ventures / Licensing Steps to Establishing an Office Advertising and Trade Promotion Pricing Product Selling Techniques / Service / Customer Support Selling to the Government Need for a Local Attorney Performing Due Diligence Marketing U.S. Agricultural Products and Services V. LEADING SECTORS FOR U.S. EXPORTS AND INVESTMENT Best Prospects for Non-Agricultural Goods and Services Best Prospects for Agricultural Products Significant Investment Opportunities VI. TRADE REGULATIONS, CUSTOMS AND STANDARDS Trade Barriers Customs Regulations/Tariff Rates/Import License Requirements Value-Added Taxes Temporary Goods Entry Requirements Special Import/Export Requirements and Certifications Labeling Requirements Prohibited Imports Warranty and Non-warranty Repairs Export Controls Standards Free Trade Zones/Warehouses Membership in Free Trade Arrangements Customs Contact Information Trade Regulations and Standards for Agriculture VII.
    [Show full text]
  • Commoning Food and Food Systems. the Contribution of Social Innovation from Solidarity Economy
    agriculture Article (Re)Commoning Food and Food Systems. The Contribution of Social Innovation from Solidarity Economy Adanella Rossi 1,*, Mario Coscarello 2 and Davide Biolghini 3 1 Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy 2 Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy; [email protected] 3 Forum Cooperazione e Tecnologia, 20146 Milano, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The need for a transition to sustainable food systems is widely recognised. Over the last three decades, movements have been demanding and proposing a radical transformation, foregrounding the social values of food. Experiences inspired by solidarity economy have given rise to highly innovative pathways, grounded on the redefinition of the food-related values and practices and the reconstruction of local, community-based food systems by referring to social and ecological sustainability. One can usefully draw from these experiences for identifying challenges, opportunities and benefits and for analysing the most effective modes of action leading to the creation of alternatives. Capturing and supporting this innovation is particularly important when looking at the opportunities offered by local food policies. This significantly involves the meanings, goals and forms that food governance takes on. The paper aims at investigating these aspects, reading the initiatives inspired by SE principles as an example of social innovation. Their engagement Citation: Rossi, A.; Coscarello, M.; in re-signifying food in terms of “commons” and in “commoning” food systems constitutes a Biolghini, D. (Re)Commoning Food and Food Systems. The Contribution complementary key of analysis. Focusing on the Italian context, the paper draws on many years of of Social Innovation from Solidarity qualitative research and direct involvement in these initiatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Italian Agriculture a 'Pull Factor' for Irregular Migration - And, If So, Why? December 2018
    IS ITALIAN AGRICULTURE A ‘PULL FACTOR’ FOR IRREGULAR MIGRATION – AND, IF SO, WHY? © 2018 Open Society Foundations uic b n dog. This publication is available as a PDF on the Open Society Foundations website under a Creative Commons license that allows copying and distributing the publication, only in its entirety, as long as it is attributed to the Open Society Foundations and used for noncommercial educational or public policy purposes. Photographs may not be used separately from the publication. Authors: Alessandra Corrado with contributions from Francesco Saverio Caruso; Martina Lo Cascio, Michele Nori; Letizia Palumbo; Anna Triandafyllidou Cover photo: © Piet den Blanken/Hollandse Hoogte/Redux opensocietyfoundations.org Is italian agriculture a 'pull factor' for irregular migration - and, if so, why? December 2018 CONTENTS 2 INTRODUCTION: UNPACKING THE DEMAND FOR UNDECLARED WORK IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN SOUTHERN ITALY 4 METHODOLOGY AND SCOPE 5 FACTORS DRIVING DEMAND FOR UNDECLARED AND SEVERELY EXPLOITATIVE WORK IN AGRICULTURE IN SOUTHERN ITALY 5 A. Historical trends and patterns of migrant involvement in agri-food production 10 B. Value chain dynamics and the impact of transport systems, retailers and market factors 12 C. Organised crime and corruption 12 D. Recruitment practices – the role of ‘caporalato’ 15 THE IMPACT OF EU AND ITALIAN POLICIES 15 EU Policies 15 a. Migration and asylum 15 b. Labour migration 16 c. Labour mobility in the EU 17 d. Policies on trafficking and exploitation 17 e. The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) 18 Italian Policies 18 a. Migration and asylum 20 b. Exploitation and trafficking 23 THE SOUTHERN EUROPEAN CONTEXT: SIMILAR CHALLENGES IN GREECE AND SPAIN 27 GOOD PRACTICES AGAINST LABOUR EXPLOITATION 30 CONCLUDING REMARKS 33 References 1 Is italian agriculture a 'pull factor' for irregular migration - and, if so, why? December 2018 INTRODUCTION: UNPACKING THE DEMAND FOR UNDECLARED WORK IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN SOUTHERN ITALY In September 2017, the European Commission context of neo-liberal globalization.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Effects and Agriculture in Italy: a Stochastic Frontier Analysis at Regional Level
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Climate change effects and agriculture in Italy: a stochastic frontier analysis at regional level Auci, Sabrina and Vignani, Donatella 30 January 2014 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/53500/ MPRA Paper No. 53500, posted 09 Feb 2014 14:05 UTC S. Auci e D. Vignani Climate change effects and Agriculture in Italy: a stochastic frontier analysis at regional level 1 2 Sabrina Auci and Donatella Vignani Preliminary Draft January 2014 Abstract Climate changes, associated to atmospheric accumulation of greenhouse gases, could alter level of temperature at the surface, rainfalls and regional water supplies. There are many areas of the Earth that will cope with a rapid increasing of warming at the surface and with an extremization of weather conditions. Although many economic sectors are influenced, agriculture is the most susceptible as weather heavily affects crop production trends, yield variability and reduction of areas suitable to be cultivated. Climate change effects represent a “challenge” that European agriculture has to face in the immediate future. The aim of our work is to analyze the economic impacts of climate change on agricultural sector in Italy at regional scale (NUTS2) in the light of mitigation policies undertaken by Italy in accordance with the commitments made by the EU Policy in the struggle against climate change. Using the stochastic frontier approach, we investigate on the Italian Regions efficiency in the period 2000-2010. Considering that inefficiency could be influenced by two main meteorological factors – rainfall and minimum temperature– we find that rainfall variable has a positive impact on efficiency while minimum temperature variable reduces the efficiency of harvested production.
    [Show full text]
  • Italian Agriculture in Figures 2001
    MINISTERO DELLE Italian agriculture POLITICHE AGRICOLE E FORESTALI in figures 2002 ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI ECONOMIA AGRARIA INEA 36 Via Barberini IN FIGURES 2002 AGRICULTURE ITALIAN 00187 Roma Italia NORTH-WEST 1 Piemonte 1 2 Valle d’Aosta 3 3 Lombardy 2 3 4 Liguria 2 1 NORTH-EAST 4 4 1 Trentino Alto Adige 2 Veneto 3 Friuli Venezia Giulia 1 3 4 Emilia Romagna 2 CENTRE 4 1 1 Tuscany 2 2 Umbria 3 3 Marche 4 4 Lazio 5 8 SOUTH & ISLANDS 6 1 Abruzzo 2 Molise 3 Campania 4 Puglia 5 Basilicata 7 6 Calabria 7 Sicily 8 Sardinia EU COUNTRIES 1 Belgium (€) 2 France (€) 3 Germany (€) € 15 4 Italy ( ) 14 5 Luxembourg (€) 6 Netherlands (€) 7 Denmark 8 Ireland (€) 9 United Kingdom 7 10 Greece (€) € 8 11 Portugal ( ) 9 12 Spain (€) 6 € 3 13 Austria ( ) 1 14 Finland (€) 5 15 Sweden 13 2 4 11 12 10 ita 2002/ing 18-12-2002 16:49 Pagina 1 Italian agriculture in figures 2002 MINISTRY FOR AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY POLICIES ita 2002/ing 18-12-2002 16:49 Pagina 2 Unless otherwise indicated, all the statistics contained in this booklet have been provided by ISTAT and INEA. For international comparisons, Eurostat figures have been used. The Italian, English and French versions of this publication may be consulted on Internet on the following website: http://www.inea.it/pubb/itaco.cfm They may be quoted providing the source is acknowledged. 2 ita 2002/ing 18-12-2002 16:49 Pagina 3 Italian agriculture is increasingly focus- the propensity of our agriculture for and agriculture sector, from economic ing its efforts on the quality of its prod- quality, and this is accompanied by a and legislative information to details on ucts.
    [Show full text]
  • International Labour Migration to Europe's
    ‘The global pandemic has painfully shown how international labour migration is essential to Europe’s economy and food security. Indeed the role of migration in revitalizing rural communities in Europe and in keeping agriculture afloat cannot be overstated. This is a timely and much needed book that investigates the social and economic implications of international labour migration to Europe’s rural regions from both empirical and analytical perspectives.’ Anna Triandafyllidou, Ryerson University, Canada ‘This is book is a must-r ead for anyone interested in understanding the phenomenon of internal rural migration in Europe, its diversity of local practices and similarity in outcomes for social groups, rural industries and rural societies across and within countries in Europe. It is the combination of empirically rich, in- depth case studies that portray the human element of migration with discussions of their significance against the background of labour market and migration theories and the specificity of the rural context that makes the book so particularly insightful.’ Bettina Bock, Wageningen University and Research, Netherlands ‘In fourteen expertly- crafted chapters, this collection offers a historically- informed snapshot of the living and working conditions of people who migrate to rural areas of Europe and the US for agricultural work. Never flinching from sharp critical analysis of the racial capitalism that often seeks to divide workforces in order to weaken them, International Labour Migration to Europe’s Rural Regions also
    [Show full text]
  • The Growth of the Italian Economy, 1820Œ1960
    The Growth of the Italian Economy, 1820–1960 Jon Cohen and Giovanni Federico CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS The Growth of the Italian Economy, 1820±1960 This volume in the New Studies in Economic and Social History series examines Italy's transformation from a largely rural state in the nineteenth century to today's industrial powerhouse. At the time of uni®cation in 1861, much of the country was backward, poor and agrarian: few would have believed that a hundred years later Italy would become one of the seven largest industrial countries, its people among the wealthiest in the world. This process of development and structural change has generated an enormous and evolving literature, alive with con- troversies and compelling insights. New research and reinterpre- tation of existing data have led to a re-evaluation of the nature of Italian dualism, while revisions to national income accounts are modifying the traditional picture of economic growth. Jon Cohen and Giovanni Federico provide a concise, up-to-date account of this literature, highlighting new views on old issues, and signalling areas in need of further research. jon cohen is Professor of Economics at the University of Toronto, Canada. His previous publications include International Monetary Problems and Supply Side Economics (edited with G. C. Harcourt, 1986) and Finance and Industrialization in Italy, 1894±1914 (1977). giovanni federico is a Fellow of the History Department in the University of Pisa. His previous publications include Eur- opean Industrial Policy: The Twentieth Century Experience (edited with James Foreman-Peck, 1999) and An Economic History of the Silk Industry, 1839±1930 (Cambridge, 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • PHYTOTRONIC NEWSLETTER N°12 and 13
    Secretariat Phytotronique Phytotron C. N. R. S. 91190-Gif-sur-Yvette Gif-sur-Yvette, April 1976 PHYTOTRONIC NEWSLETTER N°12 and 13 Contents I. Editorial ....................................................... 1 II. Retirements of Professor P. Chouard ................................ 2 Meetings III. Fifth Long Ashton Symposium (U. K.)-Environmental effects on crop physiology. April 13-16 1975 .................................. 3 IV. Protected cultivation of flowers and vegetable. ISHS Symposium Scheveningen (The Netherlands) May 12-16 1975 ...................... 4 V. Energy savings in greenhouses-Orleans (France) June 10-11 1975.8 VI. The Work of the Committee Agronomic Research-Plastic Industry-Geneva (Switzerland)June 17-19 1975 ....................................... 9 VII. III rd Meeting of the Mediterranean Group for Applied Plant Physiological Research (M P P) Izmir (Turkey) October 13-17 1975. 13 VIII. IIIrd Meeting on "Roots"-Grenoble (France) October 21-23 1975..16 Sews from laboratories and Associations IX. Solar energy for greenhouse residence to be studied. USDA.2091-75 send by Dr. D. Dalrymple ................................................ 19 X. Taiwan Agricultural Research Centre (Republic of China) .......... 20 XI. Small volume growtn chamber and its control by Dr. J. Krekule and all. Prague (Czechoslovak) .............................................. 22 XII. Laboratory of Tropical Phytotechny. By Dr. Ch. Renard-Louvain (Bel- gium). 23 XIII. National Experimentation center of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Milly- la-Foret.(France). .24 XIV. ESNA-European Society of Nuclear methods in Agriculture ....... 25 Reports XV. Photology. A New Branch in Forestry Science by L. Roussel ... 29 (France) XVI. Polluted water Problems in Horticulture by J. Wehrmann(FRG) . 32 XVII. The use of plastics for warmth insulation in Greenhouses by P. Scickler (FRG) ................................................. 36 XVIII. Methods of productivity control of greenhouses cultures in the Far North by G.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture and Migration in Rural Southern Italy in the 2010S: New Populisms and a New Rural Mutualism
    ERPI 2018 International Conference Authoritarian Populism and the Rural World Conference Paper No.77 Agriculture and migration in rural southern Italy in the 2010s: new populisms and a new rural mutualism Giulio Iocco, Martina Lo Cascio, and Mimmo Perrotta 17-18 March 2018 International Institute of Social Studies (ISS) in The Hague, Netherlands Organized jointly by: In collaboration with: Disclaimer: The views expressed here are solely those of the authors in their private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of organizers and funders of the conference. March, 2018 Check regular updates via ERPI website: www.iss.nl/erpi ERPI 2018 International Conference - Authoritarian Populism and the Rural World Agriculture and migration in rural southern Italy in the 2010s: new populisms and a new rural mutualism Giulio Iocco, Martina Lo Cascio, and Mimmo Perrotta Abstract In this paper we take up Scoones et al.’s (2018) challenge to analyse this new political momentum characterized by the emergence of various forms of authoritarian populism analysing what features it assumes in Italy. We look at the centre-left Italian governments in the 2010s (2013-2018) and at their attempt to build a new consensus based on a combination of old and new populist and neoliberal traits. In particular, we explore two issues: 1. a struggle for hegemony over the representations of Italian agriculture; 2. the “military-humanitarian” management of the “migration crisis” and its consequences on migrant farm labour. Both of these have emerged as responses to two deep “crises”: in the domain of agriculture, the crisis of Italian small and medium farming, due to their incorporation into a neoliberalizing food regime since the 1980s; in the domain of migration, the “migration/refugee crisis” started with the “Arab springs” in 2011.
    [Show full text]