DOCSLIB.ORG

Edward Mckendree Bounds on the Relationship Between Providence and Man’S Will in Prayer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Edward Mckendree Bounds on the Relationship Between Providence and Man’S Will in Prayer Copyright © 2013 Grady DeVon Smith, Jr. All rights reserved. The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary has permission to reproduce and disseminate this document in any form by any means for purposes chosen by the Seminary, including, without limitation, preservation or instruction. EDWARD MCKENDREE BOUNDS ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROVIDENCE AND MAN’S WILL IN PRAYER A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by Grady DeVon Smith, Jr. December 2013 APPROVAL SHEET EDWARD MCKENDREE BOUNDS ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROVIDENCE AND MAN’S WILL IN PRAYER Grady DeVon Smith, Jr. Read and Approved by: __________________________________________ Timothy K. Beougher (Chair) __________________________________________ Adam W. Greenway __________________________________________ Bruce A. Ware Date______________________________ To my pastor, Al Jackson, who encouraged me to pursue my seminary education and gave me the time to do so; to the people of Lakeview Baptist Church, our wonderful church family, who have been so supportive of us during these years as I pursued both ministry and doctoral studies; to my parents, who have always encouraged me to keep learning and who have particularly encouraged us and helped us in many ways during this long educational journey; to our boys, Grady Jeremiah and Richard Josiah, whose desire to be with Daddy reminds me that my first and foremost ministry is always at home; and most importantly, to my best friend and remarkable wife, Julia, who brings such joy into my life each day and provides support and strength so that I can pursue our calling to help shepherd the people of Lakeview and to make God famous among the world in Auburn. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PREFACE . vi Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION . 1 Influence of Bounds on the Evangelical Understanding of Prayer . 2 Statement of the Problem . 8 Background of the Study . 12 Methodology of the Research . 15 Limitations of the Study . 18 Definitions . 20 2. A BIOGRAPHY OF EDWARD MCKENDREE BOUNDS . 25 Childhood, Education, and Law Career . 27 Early Years of Ministry: Preacher and Chaplain During Civil War . 31 Middle Years of Ministry: Preacher and Newspaper Editor . 39 Later Years of Ministry: Personal Prayer and Writing . 50 His Final Years, Death, and Legacy . 56 3. AN EXAMINATION OF BOUNDS’ WRITINGS . 62 Bounds’ Books . 63 Bounds’ Newspaper Editorials . 142 4. THE CHURCH DOMINION MODEL AND BOUNDS’ PLACE WITHIN IT . 164 The Church Dominion Model . 166 Proponents of the Church Dominion Model . 168 iv Chapter Page Legitimacy of the Church Dominion Model . 190 Bounds’ Place within the Church Dominion Model . 194 5. ASSESMENT OF BOUNDS’ BELIEFS ON PROVIDENCE AND PRAYER . 210 Psalm 2:7-8 . 211 Isaiah 45:11 . 218 Matthew 7:7-8 . 226 John 14:13-14 . 235 2 Kings 20 . 243 Genesis 18 . 251 6. CONCLUSIONS ABOUT BOUNDS’ BELIEFS ON PROVIDENCE AND PRAYER . 262 Appendix BOUNDS’ BOOKS: EDITIONS, REVISIONS, AND CHANGES THROUGH THE YEARS . 278 BIBLIOGRAPHY . 284 v PREFACE This undertaking could not have been completed were it not for the help, encouragement, support, and prayers of so many others. Dr. Tim Beougher, my supervising professor, introduced me to E. M. Bounds during my doctoral studies, and through a seminar assignment challenged me to think more deeply about how Bounds’ theology impacted his radical prayer life. Dr. Beougher is the one who encouraged me to pursue this particular topic for further study beyond that seminar, something that eventually led to this project. Dr. Bruce Ware and Dr. Adam Greenway have further provided valuable guidance to the direction of this project. In addition, I am thankful for Dr. Thom Rainer and Dr. Chuck Lawless, who joined Dr. Beougher in encouraging me to pursue this doctoral program. Sufficient space is not available to recount how each professor under whom I studied at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary was used by the Lord to deepen my understanding of the things of God. I am grateful for the godly influence of each of those men, and the many who went before them to ensure that what is taught in our seminaries is faithful to the Word of God. Their teaching helped equip me to look at everything, including Bounds’ underlying theology, in light of what the Word of God teaches. I would be remiss not to mention here how Dr. Darrel King, the foremost expert on Bounds today, has spent countless hours sharing with me stories about Bounds’ life and beliefs and letting me ask incessant questions. His insights were of tremendous importance in this project, his prayers were much appreciated, and his making himself vi available for whatever was needed has been a resource far more useful than any biography or printed resource could ever provide. My parents especially have encouraged me to further my education and have given sacrificially of their time to regularly travel to Auburn to help my wife with our children so that I could be free to research and write. Their investment in me throughout the years, and their encouragement to think deeply about things, laid the foundation on which this work is built. Most importantly, no number of words could express my appreciation to my wife, Julia, for loving me and helping me through this journey. Her sacrifice and willingness to release me to study and write while she took care of two little boys under age three provided the time without which this project could not have been completed. More than that, her love for me and support for both my school and ministry endeavors provided me the encouragement to press on. I am amazed at the mercy and grace that God has poured into my life. I realize that it is only by His mercy and grace that I have life, salvation, ministry opportunities, an amazing family, and everything else I experience in life. I pray that the efforts of this project will be useful to His people for the sake of His Kingdom advancing and His fame being known among all the peoples. Grady DeVon Smith, Jr. Auburn, Alabama December 2013 vii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION In Christianity today, there is no shortage of books in which the author calls believers back to the necessity of prayer and the need to give it greater importance in their lives both individually and corporately as the body of Christ. For example, books on spiritual disciplines place a strong emphasis on the importance of prayer as a foundational discipline. In Celebration of Discipline Richard Foster reminds his readers that of all disciplines, “Prayer is the most central.”1 Donald Whitney also reminds readers that the lack of godliness is a result of prayerlessness since “to be like Jesus we must pray.”2 In addition, contemporary theology books, such as J. I. Packer’s Knowing God, stress that “people who know their God are before anything else people who pray.”3 Similarly, popular author and speaker John Piper asserts the necessity of prayer in enjoying God since “prayer is the nerve center of our vital fellowship with Jesus.”4 Detailed books are available on a theology of prayer such as Packer’s Praying5 and Eric J. Alexander’s Prayer: A Biblical Perspective.6 Books are available chronicling how prayer changes churches, perhaps the most well-known of which is Jim Cymbala’s Fresh 1Richard J. Foster, Celebration of Discipline (San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1998), 32. 2Donald S. Whitney, Spiritual Disciplines for the Christian Life (Colorado Springs: NavPress, 1991), 66. 3J. I. Packer, Knowing God (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1993), 28. 4John Piper, Desiring God (Sisters, OR: Multnomah Books, 1996), 150. 5J. I. Packer, Praying (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2006). 6Eric J. Alexander, Prayer: A Biblical Perspective (Carlisle, PA: The Banner of Truth Trust, 2012). 1 Wind, Fresh Fire, the story of how prayer changed the Brooklyn Tabernacle.7 Specialty books, such as Gregory Frizzell’s How to Develop a Powerful Prayer Life, are also available to guide believers in specific steps to improve prayer.8 Perhaps such modern books fill bookshelves today because, as John MacArthur describes in one of his own books on prayer, “Communion with God is so vital and prayer so effective in the fulfillment of God’s plan, the enemy attempts constantly to introduce errors into our understanding of and commitment to prayer.”9 As E. M. Bounds himself describes, “There is the decay of prayer in the Church.”10 Perhaps books on prayer continue to be written and bought in large numbers because believers sense that struggle to give priority to prayer in their lives, and its resulting decay individually and corporately due to the enemy’s attacks on this vital area of their lives. Influence of Bounds on the Evangelical Understanding of Prayer As one peruses those many books on prayer, one man from a past generation frequently appears quoted within them. That man is Edward McKendree Bounds, the Methodist pastor and evangelist from the late 1800’s and early 1900’s. His quotes, primarily on prayer, are cited by authors such as Cymbala,11 Foster,12 MacArthur,13 7Jim Cymbala, Fresh Wind, Fresh Fire (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1997). 8Gregory R. Frizzell, How to Develop a Powerful Prayer Life (Memphis, TN: The Master Design, 1999). 9John MacArthur, Alone With God: Rediscovering the Power & Passion of Prayer (Colorado Springs: David C. Cook, 2006), 10. 10Edward M. Bounds, Prayer and Praying Men (New York: George H. Doran Company, 1921), 102. 11Cymbala, Fresh Wind, Fresh Fire, 145. 12Foster, Celebration of Discipline, 45. 13MacArthur, Alone with God, 51. 2 Packer,14 and Piper,15 along with D. A. Carson,16 Neil Cole,17 Robert Coleman,18 John Eldredge,19 Jerry Falwell,20 Cheri Fuller,21 James Goll,22 Stanley Grenz,23 Kent Hughes,24 Chip Ingram,25 Cindy Jacobs,26 David Jeremiah,27 Greg Laurie,28 Erwin Lutzer,29 Joyce Meyer,30 Robert Morgan,31 Oswald Sanders,32 Charles Stanley,33 John Stott,34 Chuck 14Packer, Praying, 190.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2016 General Conference Preview
    APRIL 2016 • VOL. 20 NO. 10 FEATURED: 2016 General Conference Preview PAGES 6-13 INSIDE THIS ISSUE News from the Episcopal Office 1 Events & Announcements 2 Christian Conversations 3 Local Church News 4-5 General Conference 6-13 Historical Messenger 14-15 Conference News 16-17 ON THE 16 COVER Montage picturing delegates at round tables at the 2012 General Conference and Peoria Convention-site of the 2016 General Conference The Current (USPS 014-964) is published Send materials to: monthly by the Illinois Great Rivers P.O. Box 19207, Springfield, IL 62794-9207 Conference of The UMC, 5900 South or tel. 217.529.2040 or fax 217.529.4155 Second Street, Springfield, IL 62711 [email protected], website www.igrc.org An individual subscription is $15 per year. Periodical postage paid at Peoria, IL, and The opinions expressed in viewpoints are additional mailing offices. those of the writers and do not necessarily POSTMASTER: Please send address reflect the views of The Current, The IGRC, changes to or The UMC. The Current, Illinois Great Rivers Communications Team leader: Paul E. Conference, Black Team members: Kim Halusan and P.O. Box 19207, Springfield, IL 62794-9207 Michele Willson 13 IGRC’s best kept secret: Your church has FREE Current subscriptions! Due to the faithful payment of apportionments of our churches, free subscriptions to The Current are available to each IGRC congregation. The bad news? One-half of those subscriptions go unclaimed! Pastors: Check the list of subscribers to The Current for your church by visiting www.igrc.org/subscriptions. Select the District, Church and enter the church’s six-digit GCFA number.
    [Show full text]
  • Editor's Preface
    2 The Chronicle 2008 EDITOR'S PREFACE On behalf of the Historical Society of the Central Pennsylvania Conference of the United Methodist Church, I present volume XIX of THE CHRONICLE . For nineteen years, the society has produced a mix of scholarly, entertaining, informative and inspiring stories of United Methodism – all united by a common theme. This volume continues that tradition. This year’s unifying theme “Intersecting History” tells the stories of persons who may not be well-known, but whose United Methodist faith experience played a role behind the scenes and/or had contact with persons or situations of significance. The cover photograph of United Brethren layman Hinkey Haines from Red Lion, York County, with his more famous friend sets the stage for the entire volume. The articles are arranged in chronological order, according to the significant person or situation with which they intersect. The first article centers on Charles Wesley (1707-1788). Although hopefully well-known to our readers, he clearly labored in the shadows of his older brother John. Behind the scenes, however, the words of his hymn texts have probably shaped United Methodist theology and helped spread United Methodism at least as much as the sermons of his more prominent sibling. Last year marked the 300 th anniversary of the birth of Charles Wesley. The Chronicle thanks Charles Yrigoyen for permission to reprint in this format the presentations he made at last year’s Annual Conference in celebration of that anniversary. Preparing the article for publication, I was re- impressed with the significant content in the hymns of Charles Wesley and the casualness with which we tend to parrot the words as we sing from the hymnal.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright Holiness Data Ministry -- All Rights Are Reserved for This Digital Publication, and Duplication of This DVD by Any Means Is Forbidden
    Copyright Holiness Data Ministry -- All Rights Are Reserved For This Digital Publication, And Duplication Of This DVD By Any Means Is Forbidden. Also, Copies Of Individual Files Must Be Made In Accordance With The Restrictions Of The B4UCopy.txt File On This Disc. AMERICAN METHODISM By M. L. Scudder With An Introduction By Rev. Joseph Cummings, President Of Wesleyan University Illustrated "Ye are chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a peculiar people." S. S. Scranton & Co., Hartford, Connecticut Zeigler, McCurdy & Co., Cincinnati, Ohio; O. F. Gibbs, Chicago, Illinois; H. H. Bancroft & Co., San Francisco, California. 1867 Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1867, by S. S. Scranton & Co., In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the District of Connecticut. * * * * * * * Digital Edition 07-26-09 By Holiness Data Ministry * * * * * * * CONTENTS Introduction Book Pictures 01 -- PRESENT STATE OF METHODISM -- Methodism Claims To Be Of God -- The Phenomena Of Its History -- Its Present Status -- Its Rapid Growth, Compared With The Primitive Church -- Statistical Proof Of Greatness -- English Methodism -- Its Numerical Strength -- A Religious Educator Of The Young -- Its Literature Among The People -- Its Missionary Work -- Beneficial Re-Action On The Domestic Church - - Its Moral Power On The Masses -- Maintains Its Evangelical Spirit -- American Methodism -- A Wonderful Religious Movement -- What The Centenary Year Has Shown, By Its Services, By Its Teachings, By Its Commemorative Offerings -- General Diffusion
    [Show full text]
  • The Camp Meeting in South Carolina Methodism
    Wofford College Digital Commons @ Wofford Historical Society Addresses Methodist Collection 11-4-1919 The aC mp Meeting in South Carolina Methodism W. A. Massebeau Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wofford.edu/histaddresses Part of the Church History Commons, and the History of Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Massebeau, W. A., "The aC mp Meeting in South Carolina Methodism" (1919). Historical Society Addresses. Paper 32. http://digitalcommons.wofford.edu/histaddresses/32 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Methodist Collection at Digital Commons @ Wofford. It has been accepted for inclusion in Historical Society Addresses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Wofford. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The CaIllp Meeting In South Carolina Methodisn1. Annual Address before the Upper South Carolina Conference Histori­ cal Society in Greenwood, So Co, No­ vember 4th, 1919, and before the South Carolina Conference Histori­ cal Society McColl, So Co, Novem­ ber 25th, 19190 By w. A. MASSEBEAU Published by the Order of the Societies The Camp Meeting In South Carolina ~fethodisIll In 1798 Rev. John McGee settled at Dixon Springs, Ky., in what was then the bounds of the old Cumberland Cir­ cuit. In that same section, there was a younger brother who was a Presbyterian preacher. The McGee brothers were born in Guilford County, N. C., of Presbyterian par­ ents. John McGee became a local preacher in the Meth­ odist Church, while his younger brother, converted under his ministry, took orders in the Presbyterian Church. Having settled in the lower part of Kentucky, they went out in 1799 on a preaching tour and attended a sacra­ mental service in Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • “Redeeming the Time”: the Making of Early American Methodism
    “REDEEMING THE TIME”: THE MAKING OF EARLY AMERICAN METHODISM By Michael Kenneth Turner Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Religion May, 2009 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Dean James Hudnut-Beumler Professor M. Douglas Meeks Professor James P. Byrd Professor Dennis C. Dickerson Copyright ©2009 by Michael Kenneth Turner Al Rights Reserved To my ever-supportive and loving wife, Stephanie and To my father, Thomas, who helped every step of the way iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The idea for this dissertation took nascent form during my time as a participant in the 2006 Wesley Studies Seminar. I am very grateful for the fellowship from Duke Divinity School that enabled me to participate in the seminar and do early research on the dissertation. In particular, I would like to thank that group’s helpful leader and organizer, Dr. Richard Heitzenrater. I am also appreciative of the conversations, suggestions, and encouragement I received from Dean Laceye Warner (Duke Divinity School), Dr. Jason Vickers (United Theological Seminary), Dr. Sarah Lancaster (Methodist Theological School of Ohio), Dr. Rex Matthews (Candler School of Theology), and Dr. Steve McCormick (Nazarene Theological Seminary) both during and following the seminar. I am also thankful for all my colleagues and mentors at Vanderbilt University. First and foremost, I would like to thank the members of my dissertation committee. Dean James Hudnut-Beumler, my chair, is among the most knowledgeable students of American Religious History that I know. I am very grateful for his guidance through the program.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduced Reprint
    2008 SESSION INTRODUCED REPRINT 088238596 INTRODUCED 1 HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 142 2 Offered January 9, 2008 3 Prefiled January 8, 2008 4 Commending Downing©s United Methodist Church on the occasion of its 225th anniversary. 5 ±±±±±±±±±± Patron±±Lewis 6 ±±±±±±±±±± 7 WHEREAS, Downing©s United Methodist Church located in Oak Hall, which celebrates its 225th 8 anniversary in 2008, is the oldest Methodist church on the Eastern Shore of Virginia and named for 9 Captain William Downing in whose home faithful followers of John Wesley first congregated; and 10 WHEREAS, though it cannot be documented, it is said that Captain Downing was converted to the 11 faith by the Reverend Robert Williams around 1772; and 12 WHEREAS, the first substantiated and recorded history of the church began with writings and a visit 13 in 1783 by noted missionary Francis Asbury, who was sent by John Wesley to organize followers in 14 America; and Bishop Asbury visited Downing©s Chapel on 13 or more occasions between 1783 and 15 1810; and 16 WHEREAS, Downing©s Methodist Church quickly became one of the foremost churches on the 17 Eastern Shore and the congregation heard regular preaching on Sundays by circuit preachers, including 18 early inspirational Methodist ministers such as Richard Whatcoat in 1788, William McKendree in 1810, 19 and Lorenzo Dow in 1805 and 1813; and 20 WHEREAS, by 1794 Captain Downing deeded the land on which Downing©s Methodist Church stood 21 to its congregation, which grew and multiplied in numbers and faith until the original church building
    [Show full text]
  • This, Too, Is Harrisburg District History Prepared for Delivery at the Harrisburg District Ministerium at Salem Church in Cumberland County February 14, 1967 by C.F
    This, Too, Is Harrisburg District History prepared for delivery at the Harrisburg District Ministerium at Salem Church in Cumberland County February 14, 1967 by C.F. Berkheimer editor’s note: The title is the one given by conference historian Charles F. Berkheimer, then retired and living in Williamsport, in 1967. Prior to the denominational union that formed the United Methodist Church, the Harrisburg District of the Methodist Church included the city of Harrisburg and all of York, Adams, Franklin, Cumberland, Perry and Juniata counties. In 1967, that area included 60 charges – 11 in Harrisburg and 49 west of the Susquehanna. Since the Evangelical United Brethren were much more numerous than the Methodists in that part of the conference, the 1968 union necessitated a major realignment in the district boundaries. In 1970, the first year of Central Pennsylvania Conference of the United Methodist Church, the York District alone – which didn’t even include the entire county – had 60 charges. While copies of the paper were distributed to the attendees, this valuable contribution to the history of our conference – like most of Berkheimer’s research – was never actually published. The Chronicle is pleased to serve as the instrument by which this information now receives the wider circulation it deserves. The paper is surprisingly concise and assumes that the listeners were familiar with the persons, places and events discussed in the document. Either Dr. Berkheimer over-estimated his audience or people had a greater interest in church history in the 1960’s than they do today. Since modern district gatherings seldom include historical presentations, the latter may be the case.
    [Show full text]
  • William Penn Chandler and Revivalism in the East, 1797-1811
    klethodist History, 25:3 (April 1987) WILLIAM PENN CHANDLER AND REVIVALISM IN THE EAST, 1797-1811 j KIRK MARINER f William Penn Chandler (1764-1822) is today all but forgotten in the d If Methodist church for which he labored. He kept no journal that details his career. None of his sermons survives to allow us to judge why his con­ ~ temporaries considered him so remarkable a preacher. Even his memoir in the Minutes of the Philadelphia Conference in 1823 deals more with the circumstances of his death than with the achievements of his life. n , Yet Chandler's brief ministerial career, once sketched from the 'J reminiscences of his contemporaries, suggests that this preacher helped to shape the denomination which forgot him. For Chandler was a revivalist, one of that new breed of preachers who changed American 9 ., preaching and evangelism during the Second Great Awakening. That he lived and worked in the East at the very time when new forms of revivalism 5t were blazing out of the West suggests that not all of the new revivalistic method was a frontier invention. The revivalism of the Second Great ), Awakening was forged not only at Cane Ridge but also on the banks of at the Chesapeake Bay, and in this latter arena William Penn Chandler was In a major figure. Almost nothing is known of Chandler's early life. He was born in Charles County, Maryland, on June 22, 1764, and at some unknown date n, married a woman known to us only as Mary. While still a young man n· he moved to Philadelphia, and there on August 20, 1790, he was converted Id in St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arkansas Conference Archives at Bailey Library in Conway
    THE ARK A NS A S CONFEREN C E AR C HIVES HOLDINGS OF T H E ARC H IVES - UPD A TED JU LY -24-2014 DISCIPLINES OF DENOMINATIONS THAT BECAME THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH IN ARKANSAS: The Methodist Episcopal Church (MC, established 1784 & continued to 1844): 1742, 1778-79, 1784, 1785-1789, 1792, 1798, 1798 Reprint, 1801, 1804, 1808, 1812, 1820, 1821, 1824, 1828, 1830, 1832, 1836 1840, 1844, 1845, 1846, 1852, 1853, 1856, 1850, 1860, 1864, 1868, 1872, 1875, 1876, 1880, 1884, 1888, 1892, 1896, 1900, 1904, 1908, 1912, 1916, 1921, 1924, 1928, 1932, 1936. The Methodist Episcopal Church, South, established 1844 (MECS): 1846, 1854, 1855, 1857, 1858, 1858, 1859, 1864, 1866, 1870, 1873, 1874, 1876, 1878, 1879, 1882, 1883, 1884, 1885, 1886, 1888, 1889, 1890, 1892, 1894, 1896, 1910, 1900, 1899, 1902, 1904, 1906, 1908, 1911, 1914, 1918, 1920, 1922, 1924, 1926, 1930, 1934, 1938. The Methodist Protestant Church, established 1830 (MP): 1854, 1831, 1854, 1858, 1868, 1877, 1880, 1881, 1888, 1904, 1928, 1936. The Methodist Church, established in 1939 (MC) (Merger of the ME, MES & MP): 1939, 1940, 1944, 1948, 1952, 1956, 1960, 1964. The Evangelical Association, established 1803 (EA) 1924 The Church of the United Brethren in Christ, established in 1800 (UB): 1886-1887, 1889-1891, 1892-1893, 1894-1896, 1897-1898, 1899-1900, 1902, 1904, 1917, 1925, 1929, 1931, 1933, 1937, 1945, 1945-1949, 1947. The Evangelical United Brethren Church, established in 1948 (EUB) (Merger of EA and UB) 1959, 1967-1968 (some Journals not available). The United Methodist Church, established 1968 (UMC) (Merger of the EUB & MC): Journal of the Uniting Conference 199391941, 1968, 1971, 1980, 1984, 1988, 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • An Itemized Inventory of the Collection of Ministerial Credentials with Descriptive Annotations Provided by Wanda W. Smith
    An Itemized Inventory of the Collection of Ministerial Credentials with descriptive annotations provided by Wanda W. Smith Collection BridArch 303.70 Bridwell Library Perkins School of Theology Southern Methodist University For additional details about this collection, please consult the Finding Aid to the Collection of Ministerial Credentials. Box 835A File 01 Allen, F. L., 1865-1871 Allen, F. L., Local Preacher’s License, 1865 November 4, Methodist Episcopal Church, South, Georgia Conference[ atlanta District], Alpharetta Circuit, "held at Warsaw’s"[?], in the handwriting of and signed by J[ohn] R. Gaines, pastor in charge. ADS Allen, F. L., Deacon’s Orders, 1868 November 29, Methodist Episcopal Church, South, Texas Annual Conference, signed by Bishop David S. Doggett at Brenham, Texas. ADS Allen, F. L., Elder’s Orders, 1871 December 10, Methodist Episcopal Church, South, Texas Annual Conference, signed by Bishop Enoch M. Marvin at Galveston, Texas. ADS File 02 Andres, A. J., 1863 Andres, A. J., Local Preacher’s License, 1863 September 19, in the Methodist Episcopal Church, Springfield Circuit, Illinois Conference, in the handwriting of and signed by Peter Cartwright. ADS File 03 Andrews, Edward G., 1844-1852 Andrews, Edward G., Local Preacher’s License, 1844 August 6, recommendation signed by L. Paddock, Presiding Elder, Cazenovia District, Oneida Conference of Methodist Episcopal Church. ADS Bridwell Library * Perkins School of Theology * Southern Methodist University * Dallas, Texas Andrews, Edward G., Local Preacher’s License, 1845 April 22, Methodist Episcopal Church, New York Conference, Quarterly Conference, held in Middletown, for Wesleyan University Station, signed by Bartholomew Creagh, Presiding Elder. ADS Andrews, Edward G., Local Preacher’s License, 1847 April 19, Methodist Episcopal Church, Middletown Station, Middletown Quarterly Conference, signed by Bartholomew Creagh, Presiding Elder, Hartford District.
    [Show full text]
  • Rights Reserved by HDM for This Digital Publication Copyright 1999 Holiness Data Ministry Duplication of This CD by Any Mean
    All Rights Reserved By HDM For This Digital Publication Copyright 1999 Holiness Data Ministry Duplication of this CD by any means is forbidden, and copies of individual files must be made in accordance with the restrictions stated in the B4Ucopy.txt file on this CD. * * * * * * * ASBURY WAS RIGHT -- METHODISM WENT WRONG By Duane V. Maxey * * * * * * * Digital Edition 06/14/99 By Holiness Data Ministry * * * * * * * INTRODUCTION This publication is my own creation, and the basic propositions and assertions that are set forth herein are also mine. However, I have inserted quotations from the works of James Edward Armstrong, Nathan Bangs, James B. Finley, Randolph Sinks Foster, Maxwell Pierson Gaddis, Robert Paine, Abel Stevens, and Ezra Squier Tipple. All of the works from which I have quoted are already in the HDM Library except that of R. S. Foster, and it is my intention to add the Foster publication into the our Library within the next few days. There are indeed two sides in the matter of following a Church Leader. There are times when doing so, contrary to personal persuasions, is wrong. There are other times when doing so, in spite of our personal views, is the wise and right thing to do. In this work, I set forth 4 things about which "Asbury Was Right" and in which "Methodism Went Wrong" -- things in which if Methodism had followed Asbury's divinely inspired direction they could have avoided the rapid onset of M. E. apostasy after his death. -- DVM * * * * * * * CONTENTS 1 Asbury Was Right in the Direction He Took Methodism 2 Asbury
    [Show full text]
  • The Vital Landscape: Evangelical Religious Practice and the Culture of Nature in America, 1790-1870
    The Vital Landscape: Evangelical Religious Practice and the Culture of Nature in America, 1790-1870 The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Grainger, Brett Malcolm. 2014. The Vital Landscape: Evangelical Religious Practice and the Culture of Nature in America, 1790-1870. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard Divinity School. Citable link https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37367451 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA The Vital Landscape: Evangelical Religious Practice and the Culture of Nature in America, 1790–1870 A dissertation presented by Brett Malcolm Grainger to The Faculty of Harvard Divinity School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Theology in the Subject of History of Christianity Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts March 2014 © 2014 Brett Malcolm Grainger All rights reserved. David Neil Hempton Brett Malcolm Grainger “The Vital Landscape: Evangelical Religious Practice and the Culture of Nature in America, 1790–1870” Evangelicalism, historians have long noted, was a movement born in field, forest, and stream. Like most truisms, however, this one has rarely been explored as deeply as it deserves. Using the tools of cultural history, this dissertation explores the variety of ways in which antebellum evangelicals engaged, enlisted, and resisted the spiritual potential of the natural world in order to progress in the religious life.
    [Show full text]