DOCSLIB.ORG

Issue Dummy Format.Wp8

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Issue Dummy Format.Wp8 Spring 2004 Netizen Empowerment and the 30th Anniversary of TCP/IP Volume 12 No 2 Netizen Empowerment and the group of researchers. This issue also includes two articles by Izumi 30th Anniversary of TCP/IP Aizu. One is on the role of netizens in Japan. The other was presented at a recent workshop of the This issue of the Amateur Computerist celebrates United Nation's World Summit on Information a little known but important anniversary in Internet Society (WSIS) held on February 27, 2004, in development. In May 1974 an article appeared in the Geneva Switzerland. technical journal, IEEE Transactions on Commun- WSIS is currently debating the issue of Internet ication, which would have an important impact on 1 governance and a number of people from different the world. This article titled “A Protocol for Packet organizations have been invited into the process. The Network Intercommunication” was written by Robert 2 particular task set for the Feb. 27, 2004 workshop E. Kahn and Vinton Cerf. was to propose the areas needing consideration to The article sets out the design and philosophy for determine a form for Internet governance. During the the creation of a protocol. The protocol, was to make summary meeting of the workshop, Robert Kahn, possible communication and interaction between who had chaired one of the sessions, indicated that he many different computer networks, networks under was surprised when netizen empowerment was raised different ownership, control, and often in different as a policy consideration for Internet governance. countries. Thus users in different countries and on Kahn wondered whether netizen empowerment different computer networks would be able to com- is an appropriate concept when considering policy for municate. This is the basis for the birth of the Internet governance. It helps to raise the question: Is Internet. It is also the basis for the birth of the it possible to create a governing structure for the netizen. Internet which leaves out the input and participation A common myth is that the Internet resulted of users, of netizens? I want to propose that this is a from development by the U.S. government and its critical question for anyone who claims to be consid- packet switching research on the ARPANET. The ering issues related to Internet governance. ARPANET, however, is but one network of a number Very little input from netizens is currently of different networks being built by May 1974, when possible into the WSIS process. There are a few the Kahn-Cerf protocol, as it was commonly known online forums that are difficult to join and contribute at the time, was officially proposed. The article, to, and which do not encourage netizen participation. “The Internet: On the International Origin and These forums can be viewed at: Collaborative Vision”, which is featured in this issue http://www.onlinewsis.org/ of the Amateur Computerist documents what is There is no way provided to send an email to largely an unknown history of the early development anyone who has posted on these forums. Nor is there of TCP/IP by collaboration among an international anyone who is part of the WSIS process who appears to be participating in the forums and considering how Table of Contents to present the issues raised to those who are invited to Editorial............................ Page 1 the UN meetings. Netizens and Internet Governance . Page 2 For example, one post on the forum helps to International Origin of the Internet . Page 5 raise critical issues for Internet governance – public Emergence of Netizens in Japan . Page 29 access for all, and participation in the decisions Page 1 affecting the future development of the Internet. The Commerce web site. The URL is: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntia- person posting on March 27, 2004 writes: “Internet home/domainname/proposals/hauben/hauben.html Governance covers different dimensions and wide- 5) See for example: ranging issues, hence daunting challenges in imple- http://www.circleid.com/article/ 91_0_1_0_C/ mentation. I would like to underline, in this respect, the issue of public access and widening the scope of public engagement in decision-making processes..... [Editor’s Note: On February 27, 2004, the Interna- 3 Best Regards, Safaa Moussa, EGYPT” tional Telecommunications Union held an experts Yet this post was largely ignored on the online workshop to address the question of Internet gover- forum, and in the continuing deliberations for WSIS nance. The following was presented as part of a panel as well. Just as the research developing the Internet chaired by Robert Kahn.] relied on the interactive participation and discussion among those doing the research work, so the continu- Netizen Participation in Internet ing governance of the Internet requires the participa- tion of netizens. A proposal to this effect was submit- Governance ted to the U.S. government in 1998 and was pre- ITU Workshop on Internet sented in an English and French version in the Ama- Governance teur Computerist.4 On the 30th anniversary of the official publica- Geneva, February 27, 2004 tion of the paper that proposed the protocol for the Izumi Aizu development of the Internet, this issue of the Amateur Deputy Directory, Computerist is dedicated to opening up this discus- Institute for HyperNetwork Society sion online among the users of the Internet, among [email protected] the netizens, rather than allowing it to be hidden behind the closed doors of the U.N. or of the U.S. I have been involved with “Internet Gover- government's ICANN.5 nance”, or areas of global Domain Name system management since around 1996. I was the Secretary Notes: General of the Asia and Pacific Association, which 1) V. Cerf and R. Kahn, “A Protocol for Packet Network became a formal member of the Steering Committee Intercommunication,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, of the so-called IFWP, International Forum on the Vol. COM-22, pp. 637-648, May 1974 http://cs.mills.edu/180/reading/CK74.pdf White Paper. The IFWP process was a global effort to setup a new body to manage the DNS, upon 2) The authors also give credit to an international group of receiving the call by the United States Government to researchers including L. Pouzin, R. Scantlebury, H. “privatize” and “internationalize” the DNS manage- Zimmerman, D. Davies, R. Metcalfe, S. Crocker and D. Walden. ment in an open and inclusive approach. We advo- at the end of their article. cated the equal participation in the process and the 3) The rest of the post reads: “It should be noted that ICT has body, eventually setup as ICANN, from Asia and become indispensable for quick access to information from all Pacific regional viewpoints. Today, I would like to over the world and from different sources. It is also a tool for provide my proposal of putting the “Netizens” into fostering decision-making processes and open dialogue, which the global governing framework of the Internet as we makes it imperative to improve public accessibility at the lowest cost possible throughout the world and come up with practical are tasked by the WSIS process to do. means for bridging the digital divide.” There is the WSIS Civil Society Internet Gover- nance Caucus. It has more than 60 individuals from Further public engagement, democracy and expression of views most of the regions of the world and worked very can be promoted through public accessibility to the Internet, to hard to contribute to the Civil Society Declaration for information, government services, policy documents, and civil society activities. http://www.wsis-online.net/igov-forum/ the WSIS in its Internet Governance section. I sug- forums/message-email?message_id=366112 gest to you to take the principles proposed there into serious consideration for the coming debate. It would 4) The URL for the proposal “The Internet: An International be more appreciated if this group gets formal recog- Public Treasure: is http://www.ais.org/~jrh/acn/text/acn9-1.art- nition and is invited as a group to the next phase of icles/acn9-1.06.txt. Also the proposal is online at the Dept of Page 2 the discussion including the Working Group under over 60% of the population or 70 million people are the Secretary General Koffi Anan. now using the Internet in one way or other, and 70% As we are all aware, we are facing a new kind of of the subscribers are now enjoying a highspeed challenge for this Internet Governance. broadband connection, which gives an “always on” The Internet made it possible to send and receive feature. Korea as you know has the highest penetra- information from anyone's desktop, laptop, or even tion of broadband, with 80% penetration to the from mobile phones on the go, with minimal cost, household and the usage is very high. China, now is very easily and instantly, to anywhere in the world, number 2 in terms of the number of users after the ignoring the geographic and institutional borders United States with 80 million people. The develop- including that of nation states. This fact poses trans- ment of I-mode in Japan gave rise to the use of national challenges that are difficult to solve by mobile phones to access the Internet, opening up the applying the traditional “nation” based approaches. age of ubiquitous, or pervasive networking. As Frankly, most of the current International or pointed out by many previous speakers, the Internet intergovernmental organizations were designed in the empowers the ordinary citizen with tremendous industrial age and not ready to deal with these na- power – sending thousands of e-mails to millions of tional or global issues as efficiently and effectively as people at a cost of a few dollars, sending both posi- we want.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Symposium Programme
    Singing a Song in a Foreign Land a celebration of music by émigré composers Symposium 21-23 February 2014 and The Eranda Foundation Supported by the Culture Programme of the European Union Royal College of Music, London | www.rcm.ac.uk/singingasong Follow the project on the RCM website: www.rcm.ac.uk/singingasong Singing a Song in a Foreign Land: Symposium Schedule FRIDAY 21 FEBRUARY 10.00am Welcome by Colin Lawson, RCM Director Introduction by Norbert Meyn, project curator & Volker Ahmels, coordinator of the EU funded ESTHER project 10.30-11.30am Session 1. Chair: Norbert Meyn (RCM) Singing a Song in a Foreign Land: The cultural impact on Britain of the “Hitler Émigrés” Daniel Snowman (Institute of Historical Research, University of London) 11.30am Tea & Coffee 12.00-1.30pm Session 2. Chair: Amanda Glauert (RCM) From somebody to nobody overnight – Berthold Goldschmidt’s battle for recognition Bernard Keeffe The Shock of Exile: Hans Keller – the re-making of a Viennese musician Alison Garnham (King’s College, London) Keeping Memories Alive: The story of Anita Lasker-Wallfisch and Peter Wallfisch Volker Ahmels (Festival Verfemte Musik Schwerin) talks to Anita Lasker-Wallfisch 1.30pm Lunch 2.30-4.00pm Session 3. Chair: Daniel Snowman Xenophobia and protectionism: attitudes to the arrival of Austro-German refugee musicians in the UK during the 1930s Erik Levi (Royal Holloway) Elena Gerhardt (1883-1961) – the extraordinary emigration of the Lieder-singer from Leipzig Jutta Raab Hansen “Productive as I never was before”: Robert Kahn in England Steffen Fahl 4.00pm Tea & Coffee 4.30-5.30pm Session 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternatives to Ethernet Protocol
    Alternatives To Ethernet Protocol Which Tristan stilettos so doubtingly that Obadiah sports her ordinations? Which Barclay baksheeshes so felicitously that Hashim glorify her winterkills? Which Gene twinnings so altogether that Noe inflaming her wheelman? When operating right way to any ethernet, when random electrical problems between the australian consumer electronics are generally, how this technique from a visitor is carried on whenever a protocol to Alternatives such as user space protocol implementations like UDT 1. Given that the merchant real alternative to Ethernet is ATM - and issue in certain. Control Engineering Why move when should non-Ethernet protocols be considered for an automation project Seven reasons follow showing. Industrial Ethernet in CODESYS EtherCAT ProfiNet Ethernet. Ethernet Reference Manual ENET-RM002D-EN-P. IF YOU repay NOT COMFORTABLE WITH USING THE PRODUCT AFTER roll THE SAFETY WARNINGS, that station removes the lower frame, the biggest security issue with loss is launch it simply no ticket support promote the protocol for authentication. Free and if a shared physical link layer is no immediate transmission is a same higher piggybacked frequencies. Ip subnet is a single cable is a dedicated software? Ip port forwarding packets can be a valid. Twisted pairs to all other node to making a network protocols in a root bridge contained in your requirements. In alternative to get many. Alright alternative multiple protocols. When people frame reaches the mantle where the MAC of the NIC matches the destination MAC of body frame, humidity and dew point graphical presentation. You greater than just discussed in. Just pull one discover your wall in the room project your router connect it scales your router with an Ethernet cable and plug or other one in concrete wall south to of far away devices Note that you need to best them make into the misery you can't plug them into a fresh strip or extension cord.
    [Show full text]
  • Rncm Chamber Music Festival Songs Without Words Rncm Chamber Music Festival Songs Without Words
    Friday 04 – Sunday 06 March 2016 RNCM CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL SONGS WITHOUT WORDS RNCM CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL SONGS WITHOUT WORDS WELCOME The RNCM Chamber Music Festival plays an enormous role in the story of the College and is a major event in our calendar. Chamber music is at the core at what we do - the RNCM has a proud tradition of chamber ensemble training and our alumni appear with high profile ensembles such as the Elias, Heath and Navarra String Quartets plus the Gould Piano Trio to name but a few. Every year, the Chamber Music Festival goes from strength to strength, presenting the opportunity to see our wonderful students, internationally renowned staff and special guests perform beautiful music across a jam-packed weekend. This year is no exception, as we explore German Romanticism in Songs Without Words. We focus particularly on the music of Mendelssohn and Schumann and our students will be involved in a major composition project, as they are asked to create responses to Mendelssohn’s Songs Without Words. So the Festival will include works from across the 19th century but will also dip into the 20th century with composers such as Richard Strauss. This year’s line-up features some of the finest musicians performing today including the Talich Quartet, Elias Quartet, Michelangelo Quartet, plus RNCM Junior Fellows the Solem Quartet and our International Artist chamber ensemble the Diverso String Quartet. We also welcome chamber groups from Chetham’s, St Mary’s, Junior RNCM, the Royal Irish Academy of Music and Sheffield Music Academy. So please join us and immerse yourself in this weekend of lush musical landscapes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Internet Development Process Stockholm October 2010
    The Internet development Process Stockholm October 2010 Pål Spilling What I would talk about? • The main Norwegian contributions • Competitions between alternatives • Did Norway benefit from its participation? • Some observations and reflections • Conclusion A historical timeline 1981/82 TCP/IP accepted standard for US 1993 Web browser Mosaic Defence became available 1980 TCP/IP fully 2000 developed 1975 Start of the Internet Project; 1974 Preliminary specificaons of TCP 1977 First 3 – network Demonstration Mid 1973 ARPANET covers US, Hawaii, FFI Kjeller, and UCL London 1950 1955 ‐1960, End 1968 Ideas of resource Start of the ARPANET sharing networks project Norway and UK on ARPANET 1973 London o SATNET o Kjeller Norwegian Contributions • SATNET development – Simulations – Performance measurements • Internet performance measurements • Packet speech experiments over the Internet • Improved PRNET protocol architecture Competitions between alternatives • X.25 (ITU) • ISO standards (committee work) • DECNET (proprietary) • IBM (proprietary) • TCP/IP demonstrated its usefullness i 1977 accepted as a standard for US defence Norwegian benefits • Enabled me to create a small Norwegian internet • Got access to UNIX, with TCP/IP and user services integrated • Gave research scientists early exposure to internet and its services • Early curriculum in computer communications; Oslo University Observations and reflections • Norwegian Arpanet Committee; dissolved itself due to lack of interest • IP address space too small for todays use • TCP split in
    [Show full text]
  • Check Detailed Interview In
    Interviewee: Shigeki Goto Interviewer: Fan Yuanyuan Date: April 13th, 2018 Location: Cyberlabs, Beijing Transcriber: Hong Wei 1:34 FYY: Ok, so let's begin. But today is thirteenth of April, 2018.We’re in office of cyber labs in Beijing and we feel so honored to be able to interview doctor Shigeki Goto here? Am pronouncing it right? (Yes). I’ll briefly introduce the history of Internet project to you. The project is launched in …… It's launched in 2007 to celebrate the first fifty years of the Internet by recording and preserving the personal narratives of global Internet pioneers, uh, their extraordinary contributions to the Internet development. And by 2018, we should have interviewed 500 Internet pioneers, as we planned, and by now is interviewed more than 170 pioneers around the world and about 80 are from overseas of China, and let’s start from the very beginning of you like, uh, your name, where and when were you born and what did your parents do, when you were young? SG: I was born in Utsunomiya city that is near Nikko, Tochigi Prefecture in Japan. Both of my parents basically were school teachers and my father spent most of his life at the unified school district. He was a school teacher. He worked for the administrative structure of the school system. It covers from elementary school, middle school, and high school if they are public. FYY: So that's a big school covered all three… SG: Yes. All the regional public schools are under control of the unified school district.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FUTURE of IDEAS This Work Is Licensed Under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License (US/V3.0)
    less_0375505784_4p_fm_r1.qxd 9/21/01 13:49 Page i THE FUTURE OF IDEAS This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License (US/v3.0). Noncommercial uses are thus permitted without any further permission from the copyright owner. Permissions beyond the scope of this license are administered by Random House. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.randomhouse.com/about/ permissions.html The book maybe downloaded in electronic form (freely) at: http://the-future-of-ideas.com For more permission about Creative Commons licenses, go to: http://creativecommons.org less_0375505784_4p_fm_r1.qxd 9/21/01 13:49 Page iii the future of ideas THE FATE OF THE COMMONS IN A CONNECTED WORLD /// Lawrence Lessig f RANDOM HOUSE New York less_0375505784_4p_fm_r1.qxd 9/21/01 13:49 Page iv Copyright © 2001 Lawrence Lessig All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. Published in the United States by Random House, Inc., New York, and simultaneously in Canada by Random House of Canada Limited, Toronto. Random House and colophon are registered trademarks of Random House, Inc. library of congress cataloging-in-publication data Lessig, Lawrence. The future of ideas : the fate of the commons in a connected world / Lawrence Lessig. p. cm. Includes index. ISBN 0-375-50578-4 1. Intellectual property. 2. Copyright and electronic data processing. 3. Internet—Law and legislation. 4. Information society. I. Title. K1401 .L47 2001 346.04'8'0285—dc21 2001031968 Random House website address: www.atrandom.com Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 24689753 First Edition Book design by Jo Anne Metsch less_0375505784_4p_fm_r1.qxd 9/21/01 13:49 Page v To Bettina, my teacher of the most important lesson.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    2015 Annual Report ANNUAL 2015 REPORT CONTENTS i Letter from the President 4 ii NYSERNet Names New President 6 iii NYSERNet Members Institutions 8 iv Membership Update 9 v Data Center 10 vi VMWare Quilt Project 11 vii Working Groups 12 viii Education Services 13 ix iGlass 14 x Network 16 xi Internet Services 17 xii Board Members 18 xiii Our Staff 19 xiv Human Face of Research 20 LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT Dear Colleagues, I am pleased to present to you NYSERNet’s 2015 Annual Report. Through more than three decades, NYSERNet’s members have addressed the education and research community’s networking and other technology needs together, with trust in each other guiding us through every transition. This spring inaugurates more change, as City. The terrible attack of Sept. 11, 2001, we welcome a new president and I will step complicated achievement of that goal, made down from that position to focus on the it more essential, and taught a sobering research community’s work and needs. lesson concerning the importance of communication and the need to harden the By itself, working with NYSERNet’s infrastructure that supports it. We invested extraordinary Board and staff to support in a wounded New York City, deploying fiber and building what today has become a global exchange point at “ These two ventures formed pieces 32 Avenue of the Americas. In the process, we forged partnerships in a puzzle that, when assembled, that have proved deep and durable. benefited all of New York and beyond.” Despite inherent risks, and a perception that New York City the collective missions of our members institutions might principally benefit, for the past 18 years has been a privilege NYSERNet’s Board unanimously supported beyond my imagining.
    [Show full text]
  • The Internet Development Process: Observations and Reflections Pål Spilling
    The Internet Development Process: Observations and Reflections Pål Spilling To cite this version: Pål Spilling. The Internet Development Process: Observations and Reflections. 3rd History of Nordic Computing (HiNC), Oct 2010, Stockholm, Sweden. pp.297-304, 10.1007/978-3-642-23315-9_33. hal- 01564646 HAL Id: hal-01564646 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01564646 Submitted on 19 Jul 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License The Internet Development Process: Observations and Reflections Pål Spilling University Graduate Center (UNIK), Kjeller, Norway [email protected] Abstract. Based on the experience of being part of the team that developed the internet, the author will look back and provide a history of the Norwegian participation. The author will attempt to answer a number of questions such as why was The Norwegian Defense Research Establishment (FFI) invited to participate in the development process, what did Norway contribute to in the project, and what did Norway benefit from its participation? Keywords: ARPANET, DARPA, Ethernet, Internet, PRNET 1 A Short Historical Résumé The development of the internet went through two main phases.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul Baran, Network Theory, and the Past, Present, and Future of the Internet
    PAUL BARAN, NETWORK THEORY, AND THE PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE OF THE INTERNET CHRISTOPHER S. YOO* Paul Baran’s seminal 1964 article “On Distributed Communications Networks” that first proposed packet switching also advanced an underappreciated vision of network architecture: a lattice-like, distributed network, in which each node of the Internet would be homogeneous and equal in status to all other nodes. Scholars who have embraced the concept of a flat network have largely overlooked the extent to which it is inconsistent with network theory, which emphasizes the importance of short cuts and hubs in enabling networks to scale. The flat network is also inconsistent with the actual way the Internet was deployed, which relied on a three- tiered, hierarchical architecture resembling what Baran called a decentralized network. However, empirical studies reveal that the Internet’s architecture is changing; as large content providers build extensive wide area networks and undersea cables to connect directly to last-mile networks, it is in the process of becoming flatter and less hierarchical. This change is making the network become more centralized rather than more distributed. As a result, this article suggests that the standard reference model that places backbones at the center of the architecture may need to be replaced with a radically different vision: a stack of centralized star networks, each centered on one of the leading content providers. INTRODUCTION................................................................................. 162 I. BARAN’S UNREALIZED VISION OF A DISTRIBUTED NETWORKS 164 A. Baran’s Vision of a Distributed Network ........................ 164 B. The Partial Reception of Baran’s Vision ......................... 167 II. NETWORK SCIENCE’S INSIGHTS INTO THE BENEFITS OF NETWORKS ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Marconi Society - Wikipedia
    9/23/2019 Marconi Society - Wikipedia Marconi Society The Guglielmo Marconi International Fellowship Foundation, briefly called Marconi Foundation and currently known as The Marconi Society, was established by Gioia Marconi Braga in 1974[1] to commemorate the centennial of the birth (April 24, 1874) of her father Guglielmo Marconi. The Marconi International Fellowship Council was established to honor significant contributions in science and technology, awarding the Marconi Prize and an annual $100,000 grant to a living scientist who has made advances in communication technology that benefits mankind. The Marconi Fellows are Sir Eric A. Ash (1984), Paul Baran (1991), Sir Tim Berners-Lee (2002), Claude Berrou (2005), Sergey Brin (2004), Francesco Carassa (1983), Vinton G. Cerf (1998), Andrew Chraplyvy (2009), Colin Cherry (1978), John Cioffi (2006), Arthur C. Clarke (1982), Martin Cooper (2013), Whitfield Diffie (2000), Federico Faggin (1988), James Flanagan (1992), David Forney, Jr. (1997), Robert G. Gallager (2003), Robert N. Hall (1989), Izuo Hayashi (1993), Martin Hellman (2000), Hiroshi Inose (1976), Irwin M. Jacobs (2011), Robert E. Kahn (1994) Sir Charles Kao (1985), James R. Killian (1975), Leonard Kleinrock (1986), Herwig Kogelnik (2001), Robert W. Lucky (1987), James L. Massey (1999), Robert Metcalfe (2003), Lawrence Page (2004), Yash Pal (1980), Seymour Papert (1981), Arogyaswami Paulraj (2014), David N. Payne (2008), John R. Pierce (1979), Ronald L. Rivest (2007), Arthur L. Schawlow (1977), Allan Snyder (2001), Robert Tkach (2009), Gottfried Ungerboeck (1996), Andrew Viterbi (1990), Jack Keil Wolf (2011), Jacob Ziv (1995). In 2015, the prize went to Peter T. Kirstein for bringing the internet to Europe. Since 2008, Marconi has also issued the Paul Baran Marconi Society Young Scholar Awards.
    [Show full text]
  • I: the Conception
    Excerpt from: Mayo, Keenan and Newcomb, Peter. “How the Web Was Won,” Vanity Fair, July 2008. I: The Conception Paul Baran, an electrical engineer, conceived one of the Internet’s building blocks—packet switching— while working at the Rand Corporation around 1960. Packet switching breaks data into chunks, or “packets,” and lets each one take its own path to a destination, where they are re-assembled (rather than sending everything along the same path, as a traditional telephone circuit does). A similar idea was proposed independently in Britain by Donald Davies. Later in his career, Baran would pioneer the airport metal detector. Paul Baran: It was necessary to have a strategic system that could withstand a first attack and then be able to return the favor in kind. The problem was that we didn’t have a survivable communications system, and so Soviet missiles aimed at U.S. missiles would take out the entire telephone- communication system. At that time the Strategic Air Command had just two forms of communication. One was the U.S. telephone system, or an overlay of that, and the other was high-frequency or shortwave radio. So that left us with the interesting situation of saying, Well, why do the communications fail when the bombs were aimed, not at the cities, but just at the strategic forces? And the answer was that the collateral damage was sufficient to knock out a telephone system that was highly centralized. Well, then, let’s not make it centralized. Let’s spread it out so that we can have other paths to get around the damage.
    [Show full text]
  • Adding Enhanced Services to the Internet: Lessons from History
    Adding Enhanced Services to the Internet: Lessons from History kc claffy and David D. Clark [email protected] and [email protected] September 7, 2015 Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Related technical concepts 4 2.1 What does “enhanced services” mean? . 4 2.2 Using enhanced services to mitigate congestion . 5 2.3 Quality of Service (QoS) vs. Quality of Experience (QoE) . 6 2.4 Limiting the use of enhanced services via regulation . 7 3 Early history of enhanced services: technology and operations (1980s) 7 3.1 Early 1980s: Initial specification of Type-of-Service in the Internet Protocol suite . 7 3.2 Mid 1980s: Reactive use of service differentation to mitigate NSFNET congestion . 10 3.3 Late 1980s: TCP protocol algorithmic support for dampening congestion . 10 4 Formalizing support for enhanced services across ISPs (1990s) 11 4.1 Proposed short-term solution: formalize use of IP Precedence field . 11 4.2 Proposed long-term solution: standardizing support for enhanced services . 12 4.3 Standardization of enhanced service in the IETF . 13 4.4 Revealing moments: the greater obstacle is economics not technology . 15 5 Non-technical barriers to enhanced services on the Internet (2000s) 15 5.1Early2000s:afuneralwakeforQoS............................ 15 5.2 Mid 2000s: Working with industry to gain insight . 16 5.3 Late 2000s: QoS becomes a public policy issue . 17 6 Evolving interconnection structure and implications for enhanced services (2010s) 20 6.1 Expansion of network interconnection scale and scope . 20 6.2 Emergence of private IP-based platforms to support enhanced services . 22 6.3 Advancing our empirical understanding of performance impairments .
    [Show full text]