DOCSLIB.ORG

CS CAV in Chickamauga Campaign

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CS CAV in Chickamauga Campaign GTIC FiLE COPY 6 CONFEDERATE CAVALRY AT CHI CKAMAUGA-- WHAT WENT WRONG? 00o a) 0 A thesis presented to the Faculty of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE by LAWYN C. EDWARDS, MAd, USA B.S., United States Military Academy,. 1975 M.S., Air Force Institute of Technology, 1987 0 IC Fort Leavenworth, Kansas EB0OI- Approved for public release: distribution is unlimited 9004622 •Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 07040188 P~bh( ronm b,.0dem 10111 %tr'Icecllm Of *,fo..,jt~omt.% el-s to Ia..aQe Io.-owt Delo. the tn, for C.ee-mg ',t'I.CI,o. sesChIFg e.'sung OtIJ vo ;athe, m-9I'd -na -mg,'~the Iat& tefCCrdedvd Z~'oe g &a e-e-~nq t" coilec,'.1f MfO't41,m Semd tOntnerotj le.dt h h'etet~aC r.t te tPtIo '0le'ct~n jf fcy0 raort m<, , q 9 37"'o" fC' ' e.1v(crj It, b...dem to rqtr att s e 'kn~e Ortct1rlt of F ntatOrr Ote.~ tArd Fteoorls )2 1t' a I.,tr-r,..ay. Svte 1204. ArtflgOn VA 22202-4302 ard to the o0fice of Mjfnien-,eM 61d 8InIdget. Pape oO.o Re~duclon Ptoje. (07OA-0 81.),Alshirton. DC 20SO] 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVErE " 1 J"N 1990 Master's Thesis,Aug b9 to Jun 90 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE s. FUNDING NUMBERS Confederate Cavaly at Chickamauga - What Went Wrong? 6. AUTHOR(S) Major Lawyn C..Edwards 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION U.S. Army Command and General Staff College REPORT NUMBER ATTN: ATZL-SWD-GD Fort Leavenworth, KS 66027-6900 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 12a. DISTRIBUTION /AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE Approved for public release; Distribution is A unlimited 13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words) - itis study investigates General Braxton Bragg's use of cavalry during the pivotal Tullahoma and Chickamauga Campaigns. As army commander, Bragg was responsible for organizing units, selecting commanders, and assigning missions. His decisions had significant impact upon the tactical and operational fortunes of the Army of Tennessee and on Confederate strategy. First, this investigation defines the unique heritage of American cavalry. Second, it addresses the actuaL_ emplovmv--. P cavalry in the United States of America.- Did these- roles cor,:idu with those of European cavalry? D'd available army and cavalry leadership play a crucial part in the successes and failures of Confederate plans? Do the careers of Generals Bragg, Wheeler1 and. Forrest offer clues to their efforts at Chickamauga? Also,'.how did the elements of national power (political, military, economit, geographic, and national will), contribute to Contederate cavalry perfcirmnance? This study concludes that blame is to be shared between the commanders involved and the system within which they fought. This study presents an in depth view of the performance of Confederate cavalry in this "victory" at the "River of Death". k--,L 1, 14. SUBJECT TERMSrAmerlcan Civil War, Battle of Chickamauga , 15. NUMStR OF PAGES Confederate Cavalry, Civil War Cavalry Doctrine,' . 206 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT OF REPORT OF THIS PAGE OF ABSTRACT Unclass ified Unclassified Unclassi fied UL NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev 2-89) Pr.,,irbe by ANSI St 13q'18 / CONFEDERATE CAVALRY AT CHICKAMAUGA-- WHAT WENT WRONG? A thesis presented to the Faculty of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College in partial fulfillment o+ the requirements for the degree MASTER OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE by LAWYN C. EDWARDS, MAJ, USA B.S., United States Military Academy, 1975 M.S., Air Force Institute of Technology, 1987 Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 1990 Approved for public release: distribution is unlimited 9004622 MASTERS OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Name of candidate: MAJ Lawyn C. Edwards Title of Thesis: Confederate Cavalry at Chickamaug __-- What Went Wrona? Approved by: ....- , Thesis Committee Chairman William G. Robertson, Ph.D. _ . , Member, Graduate Faculty MAJ George E. <naup, MA Accepted this 1st day of June 1990 by: ..........- , Director, Graduate Degree Philip J. Brookes, Ph.D. Programs The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the student author and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College or any other governmental agency. (References to this study should include the foregoing statement.) ii ABSTRACT CONFEDERATE CAVALRY AT CHICKAMAUGA - WHAT WENT WRONG? by MAJ Lawyn C. Edwards, USA, 206 pages. This study investigates General Braxton Bragg's use of cavalry during the pivotal Tullahoma and Chickamauga Campaigns. As army commander, Bragg was responsible for organizing units, selecting commanders, and assigning missions. His decisions had significant impact upon the tactical and operational fortunes of the Army of Tennessee and on Confederate strategy. First, this investigation defines the unique heritage of American cavalry. Second, it addresses the actual employment of cavalry in the United States of America. Did these roles coincide with those of European cavalry? Did available army and cavalry leadership play a crucial part in the successes and failures of Confederate plans? Do the careers of Generals Bragg, Wheeler, and Forrest offer clu.s to their efforts at Chickamauga? Also, how did the elements of national power (political, military, economic, geographic, and national will), contribute to Confederate cavalry performance? This study concludes that blame is to be shared between the commanders involved and the system within which they fought. This study presents an in depth view of the performance of Confederate cavalry in this "victory" at the "River of Death". SAooselon For NTIS MIU&I DT6DTIC TAB Unannounced 13 ceV Justification 6 Distribution/ Avellabillty Codes ~Avail and/or Diit Specli 1&ii i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Title Page ................................ i Thesis Approval Page ........................ ii Abstract ..............me........a....... i Table of Contents ........... .............. iv List of Maps ...... ................................ v List of Tables .............................. vi List of Figures ... e................. vij Dedication .......................... viii Introduction ................... .. ...... •.... a............. I Chapter 1 -- American Cavalry Tradition and Tactics ....... 8 Chapter 2 -- Confederate Cavalry ........................29 Chapter 3 -- Tullahoma Campaign .......................... 69 Chapter 4 -- Chickamauga Campaign ........................ 99 Chapter 5 -- Battle of Chickamauga .... **mos....... ... 140 Chapter 6 -- Conclusions .............. ................ 167 Appendix A -- Summary of Principal Events, Tullahoma .... 194 Appendix B -- Summary of Principal Events, Chickamauga .. 196 Bibliography ............................................. 200 Initial Distribution List ............ o.................... 206 iv LIST OF MAPS Page Map 1. Theater of Operations ............................. 40 Map 2. Area of Interest .................................. 75 Map 3. ChickamaUga Campaign ............................. 101 Map 4. Battle of Chi=kamauga ............................ 142 SOURCES Map 3: H.V. Boynton, The National Military__a_Er.. Chickamauga-Chattanoogga. An Historical Guide (Cincinnatti: Robert Clarke Co., 1895), p. 22. V LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1. Abstract from Return of Army of Tennessee, 10 June 1863 .................................. 74 Table 2. Abstract from Return of Army of Tennessee, 20 July 1863 ................................. 102 Table 3. Abstract from Return of Army of Tennessee, 31 July 1863 ................................. It Table 4. Confederate Cavalry Order of Battle, 31 July 1863, Army of Tennessee ...................... III Table 5. Abstract from Return and Cavalry Order of Battle, 31 July 1863, Department of East Tennessee...112 Table 6. Abstract from Return of Army of Tennessee and Department of East Tennessee, 10 August 1863.114 Table 7. Confederate Cavalry Order of Battle, 10 August 1863, Army of Tennessee ...................... 115 Table 8. Abstract from Return of Army of Tennessee, 20 August 1863 ............................... 116 Table 9. Confederate Army of Tennessee Order of Battle, 19-20 September 1863 ..................... 143-150 SOURCES The War of the Rebellion: A Compilation of the Offici.l R qprds of_the Union_ and Confederate_Armies. 128 vols. Washington, DC: War Department, 1880-1901. vi LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1. Regimental Armored Cavalry Squadrons ............ 187 Figure 2. Divisional Cavalry Squadrons .................... 188 SOURCES U.S. Army, FM 17-95, CaQvalryOperations (Washington, D.C.: Department of the Army, 1986) vii DEDICATION I am dedicating this work to the American soldier. Not only to the soldier of today, or the blue or the gray, but to all of them. My final conclusion in this work does not lay any guilt upon the private soldier of the Army of Tennessee. I truly believe it is up to the leadership to assist and allow the American fighting man to win this nation's wars. As a member of that leadership element, I am always reminded of a quote from a past president of Washington College, R.E. Lee. He said, "Do your duty in all things. You cannot do more. You should never wish to do less." I also will allow myself the belief that the armies of the United States and the Confederate
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brochure Design by Communication Design, Inc., Richmond, VA 877-584-8395 Cheatham Co
    To Riggins Hill CLARKSVILLE MURFREESBORO and Fort Defiance Scroll flask and .36 caliber Navy Colt bullet mold N found at Camp Trousdale . S P R site in Sumner County. IN G Stones River S T Courtesy Pat Meguiar . 41 National Battlefield The Cannon Ball House 96 and Cemetery in Blountville still 41 Oaklands shows shell damage to Mansion KNOXVILLE ST. the exterior clapboard LEGE Recapture of 441 COL 231 Evergreen in the rear of the house. Clarksville Cemetery Clarksville 275 40 in the Civil War Rutherford To Ramsey Surrender of ST. County Knoxville National Cemetery House MMERCE Clarksville CO 41 96 Courthouse Old Gray Cemetery Plantation Customs House Whitfield, Museum Bradley & Co. Knoxville Mabry-Hazen Court House House 231 40 “Drawing Artillery Across the Mountains,” East Tennessee Saltville 24 Fort History Center Harper’s Weekly, Nov. 21, 1863 (Multiple Sites) Bleak House Sanders Museum 70 60 68 Crew repairing railroad Chilhowie Fort Dickerson 68 track near Murfreesboro 231 after Battle of Stones River, 1863 – Courtesy 421 81 Library of Congress 129 High Ground 441 Abingdon Park “Battle of Shiloh” – Courtesy Library of Congress 58 41 79 23 58 Gen. George H. Thomas Cumberland 421 Courtesy Library of Congress Gap NHP 58 Tennessee Capitol, Nashville, 1864 Cordell Hull Bristol Courtesy Library of Congress Adams Birthplace (East Hill Cemetery) 51 (Ft. Redmond) Cold Spring School Kingsport Riggins Port Royal Duval-Groves House State Park Mountain Hill State Park City 127 (Lincoln and the 33 Blountville 79 Red Boiling Springs Affair at Travisville 431 65 Portland Indian Mountain Cumberland Gap) 70 11W (See Inset) Clarksville 76 (Palace Park) Clay Co.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Lightning Mule Brigade: Abel Streight's 1863 Raid Into Alabama'
    H-Indiana McMullen on Willett, 'The Lightning Mule Brigade: Abel Streight's 1863 Raid into Alabama' Review published on Monday, May 1, 2000 Robert L. Willett, Jr. The Lightning Mule Brigade: Abel Streight's 1863 Raid into Alabama. Carmel: Guild Press of Indiana, 1999. 232 pp. $18.95 (paper), ISBN 978-1-57860-025-0. Reviewed by Glenn L. McMullen (Curator of Manuscripts and Archives, Indiana Historical Society) Published on H-Indiana (May, 2000) A Union Cavalry Raid Steeped in Misfortune Robert L. Willett's The Lightning Mule Brigade is the first book-length treatment of Indiana Colonel Abel D. Streight's Independent Provisional Brigade and its three-week raid in spring 1863 through Northern Alabama to Rome, Georgia. The raid, the goal of which was to cut Confederate railroad lines between Atlanta and Chattanooga, was, in Willett's words, a "tragi-comic war episode" (8). The comic aspects stemmed from the fact that the raiding force was largely infantry, mounted not on horses but on fractious mules, anything but lightning-like, justified by military authorities as necessary to take it through the Alabama mountains. Willett's well-written and often moving narrative shifts between the forces of the two Union commanders (Streight and Brig. Gen. Grenville Dodge) and two Confederate commanders (Col. Phillip Roddey and Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest) who were central to the story, staying in one camp for a while, then moving to another. The result is a highly textured and complex, but enjoyable, narrative. Abel Streight, who had no formal military training, was proprietor of the Railroad City Publishing Company and the New Lumber Yard in Indianapolis when the war began.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 3
    x Frederick H. Hackeman CAMP 85 June 2018 A Message From the Commander Brothers, As we break for the Michigan summer months, we will have some activities that I hope many of our Brothers can attend and support. Coming up this month (June) will be the Three Oaks Flag Day parade. Brother Truhn has offered his trailer to tote those of us that might have an issue in walking the prade route - like me. We’ll have two banners and two magnetic sigs to place on the trailer and vehicle to ‘announce’ our presence. We’ll also place our camp lag/ banner and have a period correct Amrican Flag. This looks to be a fun day with the day begin- ning at 3 p.m. Our mustering will be much earlier to ensure that we get into the correct slot. Then in July, Three Oaks is the location for the Civil War Days event on July 28 and 29. War There will events all day long each day. Brother Chamberlain and wife, Faye, will be two of the presenters on Saturday. Battle re-eactments are also scheduled each day for those partici- pating - and those spectators. I will have a tent set up (and camping there overnght) with a table set up for information pamphlets. I would ike to see some of you to stop by while you are taking in the various activities and sit with me to talk to the interested public. Remember, we’re always looking to recruit new members ! Commander to Page 5 In this Issue Page 1 - Commander’s Message Page 2 - Berrien County in the War Page 3 - May Meeting Minutes Page 3 - Alonzo Goodenough Veterans of the Civil Page 4 - Civil War Time Line Page 6 - Upcoming Events Page 11 - Battle of Fort Pillow Sons of the Union Camp Communicator Next Camp Meetings September 20, 2018 - 6 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Battles in Tennessee
    Civil War Battles in Tennessee Lesson plans for primary sources at the Tennessee State Library & Archives Author: Rebecca Byrd, New Center Elementary Grade Level: 5th grade Date Created: May 2018 Visit http://sos.tn.gov/tsla/education for additional lesson plans. Civil War Battles in Tennessee Introduction: Tennessee’s Civil War experience was unique. Tennessee was the last state to se- cede and the first to rejoin the Union. Middle and West Tennessee supported secession by and large, but the majority of East Tennessee opposed secession. Ironically, Middle and West Tennessee came under Union control early in the war, while East Tennessee remained in Confederate hands. Tennessee is second only to Virginia in number of battles fought in the state. In this lesson, students will explore the economic and emotional effects of the war on the citizens of Tennessee. Guiding Questions How can context clues help determine an author’s point of view? How did Civil War battles affect the short term and long term ability of Tennesseans to earn a living? How did Civil War battles affect the emotions of Tennesseans? Learning Objectives The learner will analyze primary source documents to determine whether the creator/author supported the Union or Confederacy. The learner will make inferences to determine the long term and short term economic effects of Civil War battles on the people of Tennessee. The learner will make inferences to determine the emotional affect the Civil War had on Tennesseans. 1 Curriculum Standards: SSP.02 Critically examine
    [Show full text]
  • List of Staff Officers of the Confederate States Army. 1861-1865
    QJurttell itttiuetsity Hibrary Stliaca, xV'cni tUu-k THE JAMES VERNER SCAIFE COLLECTION CIVIL WAR LITERATURE THE GIFT OF JAMES VERNER SCAIFE CLASS OF 1889 1919 Cornell University Library E545 .U58 List of staff officers of the Confederat 3 1924 030 921 096 olin The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924030921096 LIST OF STAFF OFFICERS OF THE CONFEDERATE STATES ARMY 1861-1865. WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1891. LIST OF STAFF OFFICERS OF THE CONFEDERATE ARMY. Abercrombie, R. S., lieut., A. D. C. to Gen. J. H. Olanton, November 16, 1863. Abercrombie, Wiley, lieut., A. D. C. to Brig. Gen. S. G. French, August 11, 1864. Abernathy, John T., special volunteer commissary in department com- manded by Brig. Gen. G. J. Pillow, November 22, 1861. Abrams, W. D., capt., I. F. T. to Lieut. Gen. Lee, June 11, 1864. Adair, Walter T., surg. 2d Cherokee Begt., staff of Col. Wm. P. Adair. Adams, , lieut., to Gen. Gauo, 1862. Adams, B. C, capt., A. G. S., April 27, 1862; maj., 0. S., staff General Bodes, July, 1863 ; ordered to report to Lieut. Col. R. G. Cole, June 15, 1864. Adams, C, lieut., O. O. to Gen. R. V. Richardson, March, 1864. Adams, Carter, maj., C. S., staff Gen. Bryan Grimes, 1865. Adams, Charles W., col., A. I. G. to Maj. Gen. T. C. Hiudman, Octo- ber 6, 1862, to March 4, 1863. Adams, James M., capt., A.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Tdonelson NATIONAL MILITARY PARK
    Fort TDonelson NATIONAL MILITARY PARK TENNESSEE The Fall of Fort Donelson the Confederate commanders, fearing that they were being trapped behind Fort T)onelson Grant marched his army with difficulty their own fortifications, determined to across the watershed between the Ten­ cut their way out and escape to Nashville. NATIONAL MILITARY PARK nessee and the Cumberland, and, on Feb­ Early on the morning of February 15 they ruary 12, arrived before Fort Donelson attacked the Federal right flank and drove with 15,000 men. This force was later in­ it back from the river in confusion. UNITED STATES creased to about 27,000. The Confed­ Before noon the road was completely DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR erates holding the fort now numbered opened to a Confederate retreat. It has NATIONAL PARK SERVICE about 21,000 men commanded by Gen. been said that this moment was the crisis John B. Floyd, with Gen. Gideon J. of the battle, perhaps the crisis of Con­ federate fortunes. Two courses of action Important in the western campaigns of the Civil War, the fall of Fort Donelson, Entrance to Fort Donelson. Pillow and Gen. Simon Bolivar Buckner in.February 1862, also gave Grant the famous title of "Unconditional Surrender." as his chief subordinates. While await­ were now possible. A good leader might Green, and delivering western Tennessee The Confederate authorities at first ing the arrival of the gunboats which had have saved the army by immediate re­ and all of Kentucky into Federal hands. sought to rest their line of defense on the to steam around from the Tennessee, treat, or he might have taken advantage FORT DONELSON NATIONAL MILITARY of the break in the Federal line to throw The Campaign Plan The battle marked the beginning of a Ohio River, although they did not have Grant invested the place on the west and PARK was the scene of one of the early his entire force into the fight and boldly campaign which, after 17 months of sufficient troops to hold Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • The Other Side of the Monument: Memory, Preservation, and the Battles of Franklin and Nashville
    THE OTHER SIDE OF THE MONUMENT: MEMORY, PRESERVATION, AND THE BATTLES OF FRANKLIN AND NASHVILLE by JOE R. BAILEY B.S., Austin Peay State University, 2006 M.A., Austin Peay State University, 2008 AN ABSTRACT OF A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2015 Abstract The thriving areas of development around the cities of Franklin and Nashville in Tennessee bear little evidence of the large battles that took place there during November and December, 1864. Pointing to modern development to explain the failed preservation of those battlefields, however, radically oversimplifies how those battlefields became relatively obscure. Instead, the major factor contributing to the lack of preservation of the Franklin and Nashville battlefields was a fractured collective memory of the two events; there was no unified narrative of the battles. For an extended period after the war, there was little effort to remember the Tennessee Campaign. Local citizens and veterans of the battles simply wanted to forget the horrific battles that haunted their memories. Furthermore, the United States government was not interested in saving the battlefields at Franklin and Nashville. Federal authorities, including the War Department and Congress, had grown tired of funding battlefields as national parks and could not be convinced that the two battlefields were worthy of preservation. Moreover, Southerners and Northerners remembered Franklin and Nashville in different ways, and historians mainly stressed Eastern Theater battles, failing to assign much significance to Franklin and Nashville. Throughout the 20th century, infrastructure development encroached on the battlefields and they continued to fade from public memory.
    [Show full text]
  • All's Fair in War, Streight's Raid & Forrest's Bluff
    A 2020 BGES Weekend Warrior Program: All’s Fair in War, Streight’s Raid & Forrest’s Bluff With Brian Steel Wills and Norm Dasinger October 2-4, 2020, from Gadsden, AL No Civil War figure has been more polarizing than Nathan Bedford Forrest. Yet, he was a feared and respected military commander who produced some of the great stories and legendary military operations of the war. If you have not read a great biography on the man, Brian Steel Wills’ The Confederacy’s Greatest Cavalryman should be on your list. This program examines one of the unique operations of Forrest’s command and opens a discussion on the military impact of the operation on the war. Streight’s Raid is tarred by history for its misstatements and criticism of the Union commander. Mounted on mules, the operation is ridiculed for the logistical difficulties it presented and the open opportunities it created for Forrest. In some circles analogous to falling out of a boat—Forrest had to hit water! Still, what was the impact of two simultaneous raids launched from nearly the same locations, the first being Ben Grierson’s move south to distract Confederates attention from U.S. Grant’s move along the west bank of Louisiana to cross the Mississippi; the second being Abel Streight’s move toward the Confederate Army of Tennessee’s line of supply, the Western and Atlantic Railroad, which was supplying Braxton Bragg near Tullahoma? Had Rosecrans and Grant coordinated? What might have happened had Forrest pursued Grierson instead of Streight? Clearly both raids launched near the same dates and ending within days of each other—one successful and the other a failure—are robust themes for examination and discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Tour Stops Section #11 Battle of Kennesaw Mountain
    1 The Bandy Heritage Center for Northwest Georgia Atlanta Campaign Driving Tour Kennesaw Mountain Tour Stops Section #11 Battle of Kennesaw Mountain Heavy rain plagued both armies as they withdrew from their Dallas-New Hope-Pickett’s Mill lines during the first weeks of June 1864. Forced to return to the Western and Atlantic Railroad to supply his men, Sherman concentrated his forces in the Acworth-Big Shanty region. The lack of roads and the impassable conditions of the ones that existed prevented Sherman from continuing his strategy of moving around Johnston’s flanks in order to pry him from his strong defensive positions. A more direct approach to Atlanta would be needed. Johnston, having no choice but to shadow Sherman’s movements, established a new line south of Acworth. Taking advantage of several prominent heights in the area, Johnston’s line ran north from Lost Mountain to Gilgal Church, turned east at Pine Mountain, and extended past Brush Mountain to the Western and Atlantic Railroad. This line enabled Johnston to protect both his communications and supply lines as well as the approaches to Marietta. Taking advantage of the wild and broken terrain occupied by his army, Johnston turned the ridges and hills into an extended fortress of earthworks, rifle pits, and artillery firing positions that dominated all avenues of approach across his front. Reinforced by the arrival of Major General Francis Blair’s XVII Corps of McPherson’s Army of the Tennessee, Sherman began his advance to Marietta on June 10, 1864. McPherson, on the left, moved along the railroad toward Marietta.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 11 No. 4 – Fall 2017
    Arkansas Military History Journal A Publication of the Arkansas National Guard Museum, Inc. Vol. 11 Fall 2017 No. 4 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Chairman Brigadier General John O. Payne Ex-Officio Vice Chairman Major General (Ret) Kendall Penn Ex-Officio Secretary Dr. Raymond D. Screws (Non-Voting) Ex-Officio Treasurer Colonel Damon N. Cluck Board Members Ex-Officio. Major Marden Hueter Ex-Officio. Captain Barry Owens At Large – Lieutenant Colonel (Ret) Clement J. Papineau, Jr. At Large – Chief Master Sergeant Melvin E. McElyea At Large – Major Sharetta Glover CPT William Shannon (Non-Voting Consultant) Lieutenant Colonel Matthew Anderson (Non-Voting Consultant) Deanna Holdcraft (Non-Voting Consultant) Museum Staff Dr. Raymond D. Screws, Director/Journal Editor Erica McGraw, Museum Assistant, Journal Layout & Design Incorporated 27 June 1989 Arkansas Non-profit Corporation Cover Photograph: The Hempstead Rifles, a volunteer militia company of the 8th Arkansas Militia Regiment,Hempstead County Table of Contents Message from the Editor ........................................................................................................ 4 The Arkansas Militia in the Civil War ...................................................................................... 5 By COL Damon Cluck The Impact of World War II on the State of Arkansas ............................................................ 25 Hannah McConnell Featured Artifact: 155 mm C, Model of 1917 Schneider ....................................................... 29 By LTC Matthew W. Anderson Message from the Editor The previous two issues of the journal focused on WWI and Camp Pike to coincide with the centennial of the United States entry into the First World War and the construction of the Post now known as Camp Pike. In the coming year, commemoration of the Great War will still be important, with the centennial of the Armistice on 11 November 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Chargerfebruary, 2007
    February, 2007 439th Meeting Vol. 28 #6 Tonight’s Program: Tonight’s Speaker: Ohio’s Civil War William F. B. Vodrey William F.B. Vodrey is a magistrate of Governors Cleveland Municipal Court. He has often spoken to this and other groups about the "Dennison, Tod & Brough: Ohio's Civil War Gover- Civil War. He was president of the Cleve- nors" explores the role that Ohio's chief executives land Civil War Roundtable in 2000-2001, played during the tumultuous years of the Civil War. is a member of the Civil War Preservation Each in his own way, Ohio's governors rallied and led Trust and of the Ohio Historical Society, one of the Union's biggest states during a time of un- and is a former reenactor with the 51st precedented crisis, challenge and opportunity. Despite a Ohio Volunteer Infantry, Co. B. Through strong Copperhead presence here, the Buckeye State's his many efforts on the Roundtable’s be- leaders enabled President Abraham Lincoln to finally half, William continues to make valuable and accurately note, "Ohio has saved the Union." contributions to the Roundtable. David Tod Date : Wednesday, February 14, 2007 Place: The Cleveland Playhouse Club 8501 Carnegie Ave . Time: Drinks 6 PM William Dennison Dinner 7 PM Reservations: Please Call JAC Communications (216) 861-5588 Meal choice: Braised Leg of John Brough Duck or Stuffed Acorn Squash Cleveland President’s Message Civil War Roundtable Founded 1957 February, 2007 President : John Fazio (330) 867-1535 William Vodrey will speak to us at our Febru- Vice President : Terry Koozer (216) 226-7527 ary meeting about Ohio's governors during the Secretary: Marilyn DeBaltzo (440) 461-6804 war.
    [Show full text]
  • FOR THOSE WHO STILL HEAR the Gunsrm by William Glenn Robertson
    FOR THOSE WHO STILL HEAR THE GUNSrM by William Glenn Robertson Dave Rmh of B&G The Armies (~ollide Bragg }~orces His Way Across (~hickamattga (~reek The failure of Gen. Braxton Bragg's bold and bring the remainder to La Fayette, Ga. (see Mills on the previous day by elements of effort to cripple the Federal XIV Corps in Pg. 51). By 8:30a.m., Bragg had decided upon Thomas J. Wood's Federal division, was to McLemore's Cove on September 11, 1863 (see the next offensive action to take. Believing that remain in contact with the Federals in its Maps, Pp. 10-ll) did not break the offensive Maj. Gen. Thomas L. Crittenden's XXI Corps front. On Armstrong's right, Brig. Gen. John spirit of either the Army of Tennessee or its might be vulnerable, he resolved to send forces Pegram was to deploy his two brigades in an commander. After a few hours of fitful rest, north from La Fayette to strike any elements arc stretching southeast toward the hamlet Bragg was again issuing orders as early as of that corps that could be found. ofVillanow, Ga., on the direct route from La seven o'clock the morning of the 12th. At that Accordingly, Lt. Gen. Leonidas Polk was Fayette to Resaca. When he learned around hour he directed Brig. Gen. Bushrod R. told to move Frank Cheatham's large five­ noon that Armstrong had broken contact with Johnson to continue shielding the army's supply brigade division ten miles north on the the Federals at Lee and Gordon's Mills, line by blocking any Federal push toward Chattanooga road to Rock Spring Church (see Bragg sternly sent him forward again.
    [Show full text]