Gas Liquid Reactions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gas Liquid Reactions Gasliqnew.doc 3-12-05 CHAPTER 13 Gas-Liquid Systems This chapter will focus on the systems where a dissolved gas contacts a liquid. In most cases the dissolved gas will undergo a reaction in the liquid phase. Systems where no reaction occurs are known as physical absorption while the systems where reaction occurs are referred to as chemical absorption. First we provide some examples of application areas where gas-liquid systems are encountered in the field of environmental reaction engineering. This is followed by a discussion of the types of equipment used for gas- liquid contacting. The theory of gas-liquid mass transfer and design of such systems then follow. 1. Application Areas FCC Off Gas Cleaning FCC (Fluid catalytic cracking) off gas from the catalyst regenerator is a major source of pollutants in oil refineries. These gases contain SO2 (quantity depends on the sulfur content of feed), and NOx. These gases are treated in a spray column. The spray is water with the other additives such as alkali, caustic soda or lime. A typical complete flowsheet for the process is shown in Figure 1. The design also removes particulate matter present in the off gas as well as NOx. The pressure drop is low due to the open design. FIGURE 1. FCC Off-Gas purification (to be added) Wet Gas Scrubbing This process is useful for highly diluted SO2 from flue gases. The process uses a concentrated sodium sulfite solution. The absorbed SO2 is thermally released from the bisulfite solution in an evaporator/crystallizer. SO2 emerges as a concentrated gas containing 95% SO2 by volume. This can be converted to elemental sulfur, liquid SO2 or sulfuric acid. A typical flowsheet is shown in Figure 2. FIGURE 2. SO2 removal by wet gas scrubbing H2S removal and spent caustic oxidation Caustic solutions are often used to treat H2S and mercapten containing gas streams. This is an example of a gas-liquid reaction. The sulfides are formed as a result of reaction of caustic solution with the sulfur bearing compounds. This waste stream is highly toxic with high COD. Hence, the spent caustic solution has to be oxidized to form thiosulfate/sulfate. The treated stream is then suitable for wastewater treatment unit. A typical flow chart for spent caustic oxidation is shown in Figure 3. A series of mechanically agitated vessels are used as reactor here. FIGURE 3. Spent caustic oxidation Other applications include air/steam stripping of VOC from wastewater, ozone treatment, etc. 2. Common types of reactors. Common reactors and their brief merits and demerits are discussed below: 1. Packed columns: Liquid and gas flow over a column filled with packings with the flow usually in a countercurrent manner. The design of such equipment need pressure drop calculations and establishment of flooding limits in addition to a mass transfer and reaction analysis. A column is said to flood when the gas flow is sufficient to blow the liquid against gravity and the column can not be operated at these flow rates. Gas pressure drop is usually low with packed columns. A variety of packings are available to suit the system requirements. The system is not suitable if the gas contains suspended solids. 2. Bubble columns: Mixing is caused by the gas flow alone and no additional energy input is necessary. The advantages are simplicity in construction, no moving parts and minimum energy requirements compared to other contactors. Disadvantage is the high pressure drop of the gas due to hydrostatic head of the liquid. Considerable backmixing of the liquid occurs here. Liquid hold up is high in these reactors and hence these are suitable for slow reactions in the liquid. 3. Mechanically agitated contactors: the liquid is agitated by an impeller. System has large liquid holdup and consumes considerable power. Very efficient mixing, moving parts require maintenance. Very suitable for small scale systems in pollution prevention and also for batch or near batch operations. As an example we note that the black liquor oxidation (Na2S solution) is carried out in a series of stirred vessels. 4. Spray columns: Liquid is dispersed in the form of fine spray into an empty column with gas upflow. The system is suitable for highly soluble gases, can also handle gas streams containing suspended impurities. Ultra low pressure drop for the gas phase. Some limitations are energy input to spray the liquid; low mass transfer efficiency due to bypassing and droplet coalescence and liquid entrainment in the gas phase. As an example, we note that the spray columns are used for SO2 removal from FCCU flue gases because the gas stream contains suspended solids and also because SO2 has a high solubility in the aqueous phase. 3. Fundamentals of gas-liquid mass transfer The essential concepts to describe the gas-liquid mass transfer are: (i) Henry’s law (ii) The two film model Henry’s law: Henry’s law describes the equilibrium concentration in the liquid exposed to a gas containing a solute. Various forms are used for Henry’s law. These were summarized in Chapter 3 and students should recall them at this stage. Two common definitions will be used here. (1) y = mx where m is the ratio of mole fraction in the gas to that liquid at equilibrium. (2) P = HC where H is the ratio of gas phase partial pressure to concentration in the liquid at equilibrium. The unit for H is then Pa.m3/mole or atm.m3/mole. Two film model: The basic postulate is the existence of stagnant boundary layers on either side of the gas- liquid interface. Hence the terminology “two” film and these are referred to as gas film and liquid film. Concentration gradients are assumed to exist only in the films. Outside the film, the phases are assumed to be at uniform concentration and are referred to as gas bulk and liquid bulk. A mass transfer driving force is defined for transport in the gas film liquid films individually. In the next section, we show how to combine this into an “overall” mass transfer coefficient. y =mx Gas I I phase Liquid phase xI y x x* y* Gas Liquid film film where x* = hypothetical equilibrium value corresponding to y = y / m xI, yI are the interfacial mole fractions on the liquid side and gas side of the interface respectively. Interface is assumed to be in equilibrium. The mole fractions in the bulk gas are denoted as y and that in the bulk liquid as x. yI mxI by Henry’s law assuming interface to be in equilibrium NA = mass transfer rate per area = k y y yI k x xI x where kx and ky are mass transfer coefficients based on mole fraction driving force. * Overall coefficient is defined as N A K x x x we find from the above equations: 1 1 1 K x mk y k x Alternative way of writing the transfer rate is: * N A K y y y y* = mx = hypothetical gas phase value corresponding to the bulk liquid. 1 1 m K y k y k x y y* K * x * Note that N A K x x x K x y y m m m K Hence K x y m Mass transfer coefficients can also be based on concentration driving force: * N A k L CI CL k x k LCT CT = total molar concentration in the liquid Mass transfer coefficients for the gas phase is often based on gas phase partial pressure. N A k g p pI k y k g P The overall coefficient KL based on concentration driving force is then given as 1 1 1 K L k L kG H Similarly the coefficient KG based on gas phase partial pressure as a driving force is given as 1 1 H K G k g k L where H is in units of Pa m3/mole. Various definitions and inter-relationships should be noted. Example 1: At a point in a gas absorption column, we have air and water in contact. The solute is H2S and the partial pressure of H2S in the air is 5% and the concentration of H2S dissolved in water is zero. Find the rate of mass transfer if the gas side and liquid side mass transfer coefficients are as follows: -4 kL= 2x10 m/s -6 2 kg = 6x10 mole/m Pa s Also find the overall transfer coefficient and express in terms of (a) an overall partial pressure driving force and (b) a liquid phase concentration driving force. Solution: Henry’s law solubility coefficient of H2S is needed and the value used here is 1950 Pa m3/mol. Overall transfer coefficient based on partial pressure driving force is KG and is calculated as 1 1 H K G k g k L -7 2 KG =1x10 mole/Pa m s -7 5 Rate of absorption = KG PG = 1 x 10 x 0.05 x 1 x 10 = 5.09x10-4 mole/m2 s Similarly -4 KL =1.95 x10 m/s which is close to kL. Hence it is seen that the major resistance to transport lies in the liquid side of the film for this case. Gas-liquid Reaction : First order reactions. Model equations for transport in the film. d 2 A D k A (1) A dx 2 1 where k1 is the rate constant for the reaction. It is convenient to normalize the equation by defining the following dimensionless variable. A x a , y A * Dimensionless representation of Eq (1) is then d 2 a Ha 2 a dy 2 k where Ha2 is 2 1 DA Ha is an important dimensionless group for gas – liquid reactions and is known as the Hatta number.
Recommended publications
  • VISCOSITY of a GAS -Dr S P Singh Department of Chemistry, a N College, Patna
    Lecture Note on VISCOSITY OF A GAS -Dr S P Singh Department of Chemistry, A N College, Patna A sketchy summary of the main points Viscosity of gases, relation between mean free path and coefficient of viscosity, temperature and pressure dependence of viscosity, calculation of collision diameter from the coefficient of viscosity Viscosity is the property of a fluid which implies resistance to flow. Viscosity arises from jump of molecules from one layer to another in case of a gas. There is a transfer of momentum of molecules from faster layer to slower layer or vice-versa. Let us consider a gas having laminar flow over a horizontal surface OX with a velocity smaller than the thermal velocity of the molecule. The velocity of the gaseous layer in contact with the surface is zero which goes on increasing upon increasing the distance from OX towards OY (the direction perpendicular to OX) at a uniform rate . Suppose a layer ‘B’ of the gas is at a certain distance from the fixed surface OX having velocity ‘v’. Two layers ‘A’ and ‘C’ above and below are taken into consideration at a distance ‘l’ (mean free path of the gaseous molecules) so that the molecules moving vertically up and down can’t collide while moving between the two layers. Thus, the velocity of a gas in the layer ‘A’ ---------- (i) = + Likely, the velocity of the gas in the layer ‘C’ ---------- (ii) The gaseous molecules are moving in all directions due= to −thermal velocity; therefore, it may be supposed that of the gaseous molecules are moving along the three Cartesian coordinates each.
    [Show full text]
  • Viscosity of Gases References
    VISCOSITY OF GASES Marcia L. Huber and Allan H. Harvey The following table gives the viscosity of some common gases generally less than 2% . Uncertainties for the viscosities of gases in as a function of temperature . Unless otherwise noted, the viscosity this table are generally less than 3%; uncertainty information on values refer to a pressure of 100 kPa (1 bar) . The notation P = 0 specific fluids can be found in the references . Viscosity is given in indicates that the low-pressure limiting value is given . The dif- units of μPa s; note that 1 μPa s = 10–5 poise . Substances are listed ference between the viscosity at 100 kPa and the limiting value is in the modified Hill order (see Introduction) . Viscosity in μPa s 100 K 200 K 300 K 400 K 500 K 600 K Ref. Air 7 .1 13 .3 18 .5 23 .1 27 .1 30 .8 1 Ar Argon (P = 0) 8 .1 15 .9 22 .7 28 .6 33 .9 38 .8 2, 3*, 4* BF3 Boron trifluoride 12 .3 17 .1 21 .7 26 .1 30 .2 5 ClH Hydrogen chloride 14 .6 19 .7 24 .3 5 F6S Sulfur hexafluoride (P = 0) 15 .3 19 .7 23 .8 27 .6 6 H2 Normal hydrogen (P = 0) 4 .1 6 .8 8 .9 10 .9 12 .8 14 .5 3*, 7 D2 Deuterium (P = 0) 5 .9 9 .6 12 .6 15 .4 17 .9 20 .3 8 H2O Water (P = 0) 9 .8 13 .4 17 .3 21 .4 9 D2O Deuterium oxide (P = 0) 10 .2 13 .7 17 .8 22 .0 10 H2S Hydrogen sulfide 12 .5 16 .9 21 .2 25 .4 11 H3N Ammonia 10 .2 14 .0 17 .9 21 .7 12 He Helium (P = 0) 9 .6 15 .1 19 .9 24 .3 28 .3 32 .2 13 Kr Krypton (P = 0) 17 .4 25 .5 32 .9 39 .6 45 .8 14 NO Nitric oxide 13 .8 19 .2 23 .8 28 .0 31 .9 5 N2 Nitrogen 7 .0 12 .9 17 .9 22 .2 26 .1 29 .6 1, 15* N2O Nitrous
    [Show full text]
  • Specific Latent Heat
    SPECIFIC LATENT HEAT The specific latent heat of a substance tells us how much energy is required to change 1 kg from a solid to a liquid (specific latent heat of fusion) or from a liquid to a gas (specific latent heat of vaporisation). �����푦 (��) 퐸 ����������푐 ������� ℎ���� �� ������� �� = (��⁄��) = 푓 � ����� (��) �����푦 = ����������푐 ������� ℎ���� �� 퐸 = ��푓 × � ������� × ����� ����� 퐸 � = �� 푦 푓 ����� = ����������푐 ������� ℎ���� �� ������� WORKED EXAMPLE QUESTION 398 J of energy is needed to turn 500 g of liquid nitrogen into at gas at-196°C. Calculate the specific latent heat of vaporisation of nitrogen. ANSWER Step 1: Write down what you know, and E = 99500 J what you want to know. m = 500 g = 0.5 kg L = ? v Step 2: Use the triangle to decide how to 퐸 ��푣 = find the answer - the specific latent heat � of vaporisation. 99500 퐽 퐿 = 0.5 �� = 199 000 ��⁄�� Step 3: Use the figures given to work out 푣 the answer. The specific latent heat of vaporisation of nitrogen in 199 000 J/kg (199 kJ/kg) Questions 1. Calculate the specific latent heat of fusion if: a. 28 000 J is supplied to turn 2 kg of solid oxygen into a liquid at -219°C 14 000 J/kg or 14 kJ/kg b. 183 600 J is supplied to turn 3.4 kg of solid sulphur into a liquid at 115°C 54 000 J/kg or 54 kJ/kg c. 6600 J is supplied to turn 600g of solid mercury into a liquid at -39°C 11 000 J/kg or 11 kJ/kg d.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 3.4-2 the Compressibility Factor Equation of State
    Chapter 3 3.4-2 The Compressibility Factor Equation of State The dimensionless compressibility factor, Z, for a gaseous species is defined as the ratio pv Z = (3.4-1) RT If the gas behaves ideally Z = 1. The extent to which Z differs from 1 is a measure of the extent to which the gas is behaving nonideally. The compressibility can be determined from experimental data where Z is plotted versus a dimensionless reduced pressure pR and reduced temperature TR, defined as pR = p/pc and TR = T/Tc In these expressions, pc and Tc denote the critical pressure and temperature, respectively. A generalized compressibility chart of the form Z = f(pR, TR) is shown in Figure 3.4-1 for 10 different gases. The solid lines represent the best curves fitted to the data. Figure 3.4-1 Generalized compressibility chart for various gases10. It can be seen from Figure 3.4-1 that the value of Z tends to unity for all temperatures as pressure approach zero and Z also approaches unity for all pressure at very high temperature. If the p, v, and T data are available in table format or computer software then you should not use the generalized compressibility chart to evaluate p, v, and T since using Z is just another approximation to the real data. 10 Moran, M. J. and Shapiro H. N., Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, Wiley, 2008, pg. 112 3-19 Example 3.4-2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A closed, rigid tank filled with water vapor, initially at 20 MPa, 520oC, is cooled until its temperature reaches 400oC.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal Properties of Petroleum Products
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BUREAU OF STANDARDS THERMAL PROPERTIES OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION OF THE BUREAU OF STANDARDS, No. 97 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE R. P. LAMONT, Secretary BUREAU OF STANDARDS GEORGE K. BURGESS, Director MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION No. 97 THERMAL PROPERTIES OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS NOVEMBER 9, 1929 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1929 F<ir isale by tfttf^uperintendent of Dotmrtients, Washington, D. C. - - - Price IS cants THERMAL PROPERTIES OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS By C. S. Cragoe ABSTRACT Various thermal properties of petroleum products are given in numerous tables which embody the results of a critical study of the data in the literature, together with unpublished data obtained at the Bureau of Standards. The tables contain what appear to be the most reliable values at present available. The experimental basis for each table, and the agreement of the tabulated values with experimental results, are given. Accompanying each table is a statement regarding the esti- mated accuracy of the data and a practical example of the use of the data. The tables have been prepared in forms convenient for use in engineering. CONTENTS Page I. Introduction 1 II. Fundamental units and constants 2 III. Thermal expansion t 4 1. Thermal expansion of petroleum asphalts and fluxes 6 2. Thermal expansion of volatile petroleum liquids 8 3. Thermal expansion of gasoline-benzol mixtures 10 IV. Heats of combustion : 14 1. Heats of combustion of crude oils, fuel oils, and kerosenes 16 2. Heats of combustion of volatile petroleum products 18 3. Heats of combustion of gasoline-benzol mixtures 20 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in State and Latent Heat
    Physical State/Latent Heat Changes in State and Latent Heat Physical States of Water Latent Heat Physical States of Water The three physical states of matter that we normally encounter are solid, liquid, and gas. Water can exist in all three physical states at ordinary temperatures on the Earth's surface. When water is in the vapor state, as a gas, the water molecules are not bonded to each other. They float around as single molecules. When water is in the liquid state, some of the molecules bond to each other with hydrogen bonds. The bonds break and re-form continually. When water is in the solid state, as ice, the molecules are bonded to each other in a solid crystalline structure. This structure is six- sided, with each molecule of water connected to four others with hydrogen bonds. Because of the way the crystal is arranged, there is actually more empty space between the molecules than there is in liquid water, so ice is less dense. That is why ice floats. Latent Heat Each time water changes physical state, energy is involved. In the vapor state, the water molecules are very energetic. The molecules are not bonded with each other, but move around as single molecules. Water vapor is invisible to us, but we can feel its effect to some extent, and water vapor in the atmosphere is a very important http://daphne.palomar.edu/jthorngren/latent.htm (1 of 4) [4/9/04 5:30:18 PM] Physical State/Latent Heat factor in weather and climate. In the liquid state, the individual molecules have less energy, and some bonds form, break, then re-form.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Advice. Cryogenic Liquefied Gases
    Safety advice. Cryogenic liquefied gases. Properties Cryogenic Liquefied Gases are also known as Refrigerated Liquefied Gases or Deeply Refrigerated Gases and are commonly called Cryogenic Liquids. Cryogenic Gases are cryogenic liquids that have been vaporised and may still be at a low temperature. Cryogenic liquids are used for their low temperature properties or to allow larger quantities to be stored or transported. They are extremely cold, with boiling points below -150°C (-238°F). Carbon dioxide and Nitrous oxide, which both have higher boiling points, are sometimes included in this category. In the table you may find some data related to the most common Cryogenic Gases. Helium Hydrogen Nitrogen Argon Oxygen LNG Nitrous Carbon Oxide Dioxide Chemical symbol He H2 N2 Ar O2 CH4 N2O CO2 Boiling point at 1013 mbar [°C] -269 -253 -196 -186 -183 -161 -88.5 -78.5** Density of the liquid at 1013 mbar [kg/l] 0.124 0.071 0.808 1.40 1.142 0.42 1.2225 1.1806 3 Density of the gas at 15°C, 1013 mbar [kg/m ] 0.169 0.085 1.18 1.69 1.35 0.68 3.16 1.87 Relative density (air=1) at 15°C, 1013 mbar * 0.14 0.07 0.95 1.38 1.09 0.60 1.40 1.52 Gas quantity vaporized from 1 litre liquid [l] 748 844 691 835 853 630 662 845 Flammability range n.a. 4%–75% n.a. n.a. n.a. 4.4%–15% n.a. n.a. Notes: *All the above gases are heavier than air at their boiling point; **Sublimation point (where it exists as a solid) Linde AG Gases Division, Carl-von-Linde-Strasse 25, 85716 Unterschleissheim, Germany Phone +49.89.31001-0, [email protected], www.linde-gas.com 0113 – SA04 LCS0113 Disclaimer: The Linde Group has no control whatsoever as regards performance or non-performance, misinterpretation, proper or improper use of any information or suggestions contained in this instruction by any person or entity and The Linde Group expressly disclaims any liability in connection thereto.
    [Show full text]
  • The Particle Model of Matter 5.1
    The Particle Model of Matter 5.1 More than 2000 years ago in Greece, a philosopher named Democritus suggested that matter is made up of tiny particles too small to be seen. He thought that if you kept cutting a substance into smaller and smaller pieces, you would eventually come to the smallest possible particles—the building blocks of matter. Many years later, scientists came back to Democritus’ idea and added to it. The theory they developed is called the particle model of matter. LEARNING TIP There are four main ideas in the particle model: Are you able to explain the 1. All matter is made up of tiny particles. particle model of matter in your own words? If not, re-read the main ideas and examine the illustration that goes with each. 2. The particles of matter are always moving. 3. The particles have spaces between them. 4. Adding heat to matter makes the particles move faster. heat Scientists find the particle model useful for two reasons. First, it provides a reasonable explanation for the behaviour of matter. Second, it presents a very important idea—the particles of matter are always moving. Matter that seems perfectly motionless is not motionless at all. The air you breathe, your books, your desk, and even your body all consist of particles that are in constant motion. Thus, the particle model can be used to explain the properties of solids, liquids, and gases. It can also be used to explain what happens in changes of state (Figure 1 on the next page). NEL 5.1 The Particle Model of Matter 117 The particles in a solid are held together strongly.
    [Show full text]
  • Gas–Solid Reactions Are Very Important in Many Chemical
    Quantized Method Solution for Various Fluid-Solid Reaction Models H. Delavari Amrei*, E. Jamshidi, H. Ale Ebrahim Department of Chemical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Petrochemical Center of Excellency, Tehran 15875-4413, Iran. *Corresponding author. Tel.: +98 21 64543177; fax: +98 21 66405847. E-mail address:[email protected] (H. Delavari Amrei) Abstract Fluid–solid reactions exist in many chemical and metallurgical process industries. Several models describe these reactions such as volume reaction model, grain model, random pore model and nucleation model. These models give two nonlinear coupled partial differential equations (CPDE) that must be solved numerically. A new approximate solution technique (quantized method) has been introduced for some of these models in recent years. In this work, the various fluid-solid reaction models with their quantized and numerical solutions have been discussed. Keywords: Fluid-solid reaction, Quantized method, Mathematical models. 1 Contents 1. Introduction......................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Mathematical models of single pellet reaction and their QM solutions ............................................. 5 2.1. Volume reaction model ................................................................................................................ 5 2.2. Grain model ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Notes for States of Matter/Boiling, Melting and Freezing Points/ and Changes in Matter
    Notes for States of Matter/Boiling, Melting and Freezing Points/ and Changes in Matter Matter can be described as anything that takes up space and has mass. There are three states of matter: solid, liquid, and gas. Solids have a definite shape and volume. The particles are tightly packed and move very slowly. Liquids have a definite volume but take the shape of the container they are in. The particles are farther apart. The particles move and slide past each other. Gases have no volume or shape. The particles move freely and rapidly. The boiling, freezing and melting points are constant for each type of matter. For water, the boiling point is 100°C/ freezing and melting points are 0°C. Adding salt to water decreases the freezing point of water. That is why salt is put on icy roads in the winter or why salt is added to an old-fashioned ice cream maker. Adding salt to water increases the boiling point of water. States of matter can be changed by adding or lessening heat. When a substance is heated, the particles move rapidly. Heated solid turns into liquid and heated liquid turns into gas. Removing heat (cooling) turns gas into liquid and turns liquid into solid. Evaporation happens when a substances is heated. Condensation happens when a substance is cooled. Notes for States of Matter/Boiling, Melting and Freezing Points/ and Changes in Matter Matter can be described as anything that takes up space and has mass. There are three states of matter: solid, liquid, and gas. Solids have a definite shape and volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Equations of State and Equation of State Software Packages
    USE OF EQUATIONS OF STATE AND EQUATION OF STATE SOFTWARE PACKAGES Adam G. Hawley Darin L. George Southwest Research Institute 6220 Culebra Road San Antonio, TX 78238 Introduction Peng-Robinson (PR) Determination of fluid properties and phase The Peng-Robison (PR) EOS (Peng and Robinson, conditions of hydrocarbon mixtures is critical 1976) is referred to as a cubic equation of state, for accurate hydrocarbon measurement, because the basic equations can be rewritten as cubic representative sampling, and overall pipeline polynomials in specific volume. The Peng Robison operation. Fluid properties such as EOS is derived from the basic ideal gas law along with other corrections, to account for the behavior of compressibility and density are critical for flow a “real” gas. The Peng Robison EOS is very measurement and determination of the versatile and can be used to determine properties hydrocarbon due point is important to verify such as density, compressibility, and sound speed. that heavier hydrocarbons will not condense out The Peng Robison EOS can also be used to of a gas mixture in changing process conditions. determine phase boundaries and the phase conditions of hydrocarbon mixtures. In the oil and gas industry, equations of state (EOS) are typically used to determine the Soave-Redlich-Kwong (SRK) properties and the phase conditions of hydrocarbon mixtures. Equations of state are The Soave-Redlich-Kwaon (SRK) EOS (Soave, 1972) is a cubic equation of state, similar to the Peng mathematical correlations that relate properties Robison EOS. The main difference between the of hydrocarbons to pressure, temperature, and SRK and Peng Robison EOS is the different sets of fluid composition.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Notes in Physics Introduction to Plasma Physics
    Lecture Notes in Physics Introduction to Plasma Physics Michael Gedalin ii Contents 1 Basic definitions and parameters 1 1.1 What is plasma . 1 1.2 Debye shielding . 2 1.3 Plasma parameter . 4 1.4 Plasma oscillations . 5 1.5 ∗Ionization degree∗ ............................ 5 1.6 Summary . 6 1.7 Problems . 7 2 Plasma description 9 2.1 Hierarchy of descriptions . 9 2.2 Fluid description . 10 2.3 Continuity equation . 10 2.4 Motion (Euler) equation . 11 2.5 State equation . 12 2.6 MHD . 12 2.7 Order-of-magnitude estimates . 14 2.8 Summary . 14 2.9 Problems . 15 3 MHD equilibria and waves 17 3.1 Magnetic field diffusion and dragging . 17 3.2 Equilibrium conditions . 18 3.3 MHD waves . 19 3.4 Alfven and magnetosonic modes . 22 3.5 Wave energy . 23 3.6 Summary . 24 3.7 Problems . 24 iii CONTENTS 4 MHD discontinuities 27 4.1 Stationary structures . 27 4.2 Discontinuities . 28 4.3 Shocks . 29 4.4 Why shocks ? . 31 4.5 Problems . 32 5 Two-fluid description 33 5.1 Basic equations . 33 5.2 Reduction to MHD . 34 5.3 Generalized Ohm’s law . 35 5.4 Problems . 36 6 Waves in dispersive media 37 6.1 Maxwell equations for waves . 37 6.2 Wave amplitude, velocity etc. 38 6.3 Wave energy . 40 6.4 Problems . 44 7 Waves in two-fluid hydrodynamics 47 7.1 Dispersion relation . 47 7.2 Unmagnetized plasma . 49 7.3 Parallel propagation . 49 7.4 Perpendicular propagation . 50 7.5 General properties of the dispersion relation .
    [Show full text]