DOCSLIB.ORG

Pavilion Plaza West Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pavilion Plaza West Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration 7.1.1.1.1 PAVILION PLAZA WEST INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Lead Agency: City of Garden Grove Community and Economic Development Department 11222 Acacia Parkway Garden Grove, CA 92840 Project Applicant: Sterling Organization 302 Daturta Street, Suite 100 West Palm Beach, FL. 33401 Prepared by: Environment Planning Development Solutions, Inc. 2 Park Plz., Suite 1120 Irvine, CA 92614 January 2021 Pavilion Plaza West Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE INITIAL STUDY ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION ..................................................................................................................... 2 2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ............................................................................................... 3 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION ..................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 EXISTING PROJECT SITE ................................................................................................................................ 3 2.3 EXISTING LAND USES AND ZONING DESIGNATION OF THE PROJECT SITE ................................... 3 2.4 SURROUNDING GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS ...................................................... 3 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................... 11 3.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................................. 11 3.2 PROJECT FEATURES .................................................................................................................................... 11 3.3 CONSTRUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 13 3.4 DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS AND PERMITS ........................................................................................ 13 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ......................................................................................... 21 4.1 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ....................................................................... 21 4.2 DETERMINATION ......................................................................................................................................... 22 4.3 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST QUESTIONS ........................................................................................... 24 1. AESTHETICS ........................................................................................................................................................ 24 2. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES .............................................................................................. 29 3. AIR QUALITY ...................................................................................................................................................... 32 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES .............................................................................................................................. 38 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................................... 42 6. ENERGY .............................................................................................................................................................. 45 7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS ................................................................................................................................... 49 8. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ................................................................................................................... 56 9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ................................................................................................... 60 10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY ........................................................................................................ 66 11. LAND USE AND PLANNING ......................................................................................................................... 75 12. MINERAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................................... 77 13. NOISE ............................................................................................................................................................... 79 14. POPULATION AND HOUSING .................................................................................................................... 88 15. PUBLIC SERVICES ............................................................................................................................................ 90 16. RECREATION ................................................................................................................................................... 94 17. TRANSPORTATION ........................................................................................................................................ 96 18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................. 113 19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS ............................................................................................................. 117 20. WILDFIRES ..................................................................................................................................................... 122 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE ......................................................................................... 124 5 DOCUMENT PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTORS ............................................................ 127 i Pavilion Plaza West Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Figures Figure 1: Regional Location .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Figure 2: Local Vicinity ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 3: Aerial View ......................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 4: Conceptual Site Plan ....................................................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 5: Project Elevations ............................................................................................................................................................. 17 Figure 6: Landscaping Plan ............................................................................................................................................................. 19 Figure N-1: Receiver Locations and Project Plus Ambient Noise Levels .................................................................................. 85 Figure T-1: Traffic Study Intersections ........................................................................................................................................... 99 Figure T-2: High Quality Transit Corridor ................................................................................................................................. 105 Figure T-3: Low VMT Generating Traffic Analysis Zones ....................................................................................................... 107 Figure T-4: Location of Similar Retail Stores ............................................................................................................................. 109 Tables Table 1: Surrounding Existing Land Use and Zoning Designations ............................................................................................ 4 Table 2: Proposed Commercial Retail and Restaurant Uses ..................................................................................................... 11 Table 3: Proposed Vehicular Parking and Charging Stations .................................................................................................. 12 Table 4: Construction Schedule ...................................................................................................................................................... 13 Table AES-1: Development Standards for the Neighborhood Mixed Use Zone ................................................................... 13 Table AQ-1: SCAQMD Regional Daily Emissions Thresholds .................................................................................................... 33 Table AQ-2: Construction Emissions Summary ............................................................................................................................. 34 Table AQ-3: Summary of Peak Operational Emissions ............................................................................................................. 35 Table AQ-4: Localized Significance Summary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jational Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form
    •m No. 10-300 REV. (9/77) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE JATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ____________TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS >_____ NAME HISTORIC BROADWAY THEATER AND COMMERCIAL DISTRICT________________________ AND/OR COMMON LOCATION STREET & NUMBER <f' 300-8^9 ^tttff Broadway —NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Los Angeles VICINITY OF 25 STATE CODE COUNTY CODE California 06 Los Angeles 037 | CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE X.DISTRICT —PUBLIC ^.OCCUPIED _ AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM _BUILDING(S) —PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED .^COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE .XBOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE ^ENTERTAINMENT _ REUGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS 2L.YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY —OTHER: NAME Multiple Ownership (see list) STREET & NUMBER CITY. TOWN STATE VICINITY OF | LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDSETC. Los Angeie s County Hall of Records STREET & NUMBER 320 West Temple Street CITY. TOWN STATE Los Angeles California ! REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TiTLE California Historic Resources Inventory DATE July 1977 —FEDERAL ^JSTATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS office of Historic Preservation CITY, TOWN STATE . ,. Los Angeles California DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED ^ORIGINAL SITE X.GOOD 0 —RUINS X_ALTERED _MOVED DATE- —FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The Broadway Theater and Commercial District is a six-block complex of predominately commercial and entertainment structures done in a variety of architectural styles. The district extends along both sides of Broadway from Third to Ninth Streets and exhibits a number of structures in varying condition and degree of alteration.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Bus and Metro Rail System
    Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Metro Bus Lines East/West Local Service in other areas Weekdays Saturdays Sundays North/South Local Service in other areas Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Limited Stop Service Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Special Service Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Approximate frequency in minutes Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Weekdays Saturdays Sundays 102 Walnut Park-Florence-East Jefferson Bl- 200 Alvarado St 5-8 11 12-30 10 12-30 12 12-30 302 Sunset Bl Limited 6-20—————— 603 Rampart Bl-Hoover St-Allesandro St- Local Service To/From Downtown LA 29-4038-4531-4545454545 10-12123020-303020-3030 Exposition Bl-Coliseum St 201 Silverlake Bl-Atwater-Glendale 40 40 40 60 60a 60 60a 305 Crosstown Bus:UCLA/Westwood- Colorado St Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve 3045-60————— NEWHALL 105 202 Imperial/Wilmington Station Limited 605 SANTA CLARITA 2 Sunset Bl 3-8 9-10 15-30 12-14 15-30 15-25 20-30 Vernon Av-La Cienega Bl 15-18 18-20 20-60 15 20-60 20 40-60 Willowbrook-Compton-Wilmington 30-60 — 60* — 60* — —60* Grande Vista Av-Boyle Heights- 5 10 15-20 30a 30 30a 30 30a PRINCESSA 4 Santa Monica Bl 7-14 8-14 15-18 12-18 12-15 15-30 15 108 Marina del Rey-Slauson Av-Pico Rivera 4-8 15 18-60 14-17 18-60 15-20 25-60 204 Vermont Av 6-10 10-15 20-30 15-20 15-30 12-15 15-30 312 La Brea
    [Show full text]
  • Update on Acquisition of Permanent Subsurface Easements Through The
    June 13, 1995 Los Angeles County TO: BOARD OF DIRECTORS Metropolitan Transportation THROUGH: Authority FROM: 425 South Main Street SUBJECT: UPDATE ON ACQUISITION OF PERMANENT Los Angeles, CA SUBSURFACE EASEMENTS THROUGH THE 9oo~3q393 HOLLYWOODHILLS 213.972.6ooo BACKGROUND At its May24, 1995 meeting, the MTABoard of Directors was requested to hold a public hearing and adopt a Resolution of Necessity authorizing the commencementof eminent domain proceedings to acquire permanent subsurface easements (PSE) from approximately84 properties. The properties are located in the HollywoodHills along the alignment of the Metro Rail Segment 3 tunnel alignment between the Hollywood/Highlandand Universal City stations. Approximately 30 property owners were present at the meeting and addressed the Board concerning the staffs request to initiate condemnation action. The Board deferred any action on the adoption of the resolution for 30 days and requested staff to work with the property ownersduring the 30 days and report back to the Board on all actions taken. ACTIONS TAKEN SUBSEQUENT TO BOARD MEETING The Real Estate, Construction and Public Affairs staffs immediately made plans to hold a communitymeeting with the property owners to discuss the project and to respond to all questions raised by the property owners. A meeting was held on Wednesday, May31, at the CampoDe Cahuenga in Studio City. A meeting notice was sent to all property owner notifying them of the meeting. Approximately 35 property owners attended the meeting. Staff members from Real Estate, Construction and County Counsel made presentations and answered questions raised by the property owners. A written response to frequently asked Real Estate questions was prepared as a hand-out and was distributed at the meeting (Attachment 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Activities Fee Must Passi
    University of California at Irvine Volume 1, 'Num.ber 7 MORNING EDITION Thursday, Novembe·r 17, 1966 Orange County's Growth, Politics Activities Fee Make Newsweek Orange County's· growth and ' poli~ics hit the national scene Must Passi last week. N eiwsweek, No- The Activities Fee is a Must! Without it there will be vember 14 unearths the "rightist virtually nothing to da way O'Ut here in the middle of haven of Orange County." nowhere "It is the land of buldozed These are some of the many functions the Activity Fee orange groves and American has supported: flags 40 feet long. It is: the fifth • Chad and Jeremy Concert hous,ing project after the fourth • Sports events (rall ies and rooter buses) freeway wreck on the right. It • The Yearbook is waving at a next-door neigh- • Jose Feliciano concert bor and then realizing with a • The Anthill (If you can take it!) .start that hes not the one who 9 The Association concert was there last week. It is iin • The Family Dog show (Op-Dance) short, Orange County, Calif. - • And hopefully, in the future, a·n ASUCI Book fastest changing county in the Store so you won't have to pay the exhor.bitant U.S., and the one fastest to re- prices that you pay now. sist change." • And also, hopefully, a Student Union. The article considers the ~::::::'::::·::::::::ti.::.·:,:·::_·;::~ ;:.=~x ~~~~@dLk1\hitu~;·~~~ :: .:::; .;~.:···::'.:··· ···~::::·::·~::;:3:~:::.~:/'.fkUfLIU:L ??itrnH1MIMMJfatMl So do it! Vote "YES" for the Activities Fee! county's fantastic population STUDENTS IN GATEWAF PLAZA - Four students sit on the The Anthill Staff rise, pointing to• Ga['den Grove, steps in UCl's Gateway Plaza as one student lies among a town fifteen years old with a them.
    [Show full text]
  • Inherent Vice, Aproductivity, and Narrative
    Overwhelmed and Underworked: Inherent Vice, Aproductivity, and Narrative Miles Taylor A Thesis in The Department of Film Studies Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (Film Studies) at Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada May 2020 © Miles Taylor 2020 Signature Page This is to certify that the thesis prepared By: Miles Taylor Entitled: Overwhelmed and Underworked: Inherent Vice, Aproductivity, and Narrative And submitted in Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (Film Studies) Complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final Examining Committee: Examiner Luca Caminati Examiner Mary Esteve Supervisor Martin Lefebvre Approved by Marc Steinberg 2020 Rebecca Duclos Taylor iii Abstract Overwhelmed and Underworked: Inherent Vice, Aproductivity, and Narrative Miles Taylor This thesis proposes an artistic mode called aproductivity, which arises with the secular crisis of capitalism in the early 1970’s. It reads aproductivity as the aesthetic reification of Theodor Adorno’s negative dialectics, a peculiar form of philosophy that refuses to move forward, instead producing dialectics without synthesis. The first chapter examines the economic history aproductivity grows out of, as well as its relation to Francis Fukuyama’s concept of “The End of History.” After doing so, the chapter explores negative dialectics and aproductivity in relation to Adam Phillips’ concept of the transformational object. In the second chapter, the thesis looks at the Thomas Pynchon novel Inherent Vice (2009), as well as the 2014 Paul Thomas Anderson adaptation of the same name.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of BREA NOTICE of PREPARATION of a DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT for the BREA MALL MIXED USE PROJECT and NOTICE of SCOPING MEETING
    CITY OF BREA NOTICE OF PREPARATION of a DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT for the BREA MALL MIXED USE PROJECT and NOTICE OF SCOPING MEETING Date: August 16, 2019 Subject: Notice of Preparation (NOP) and Scoping Meeting for the Brea Mall Mixed Use Project Draft Environmental Impact Report To: State Clearinghouse, State Responsible Agencies, State Trustee Agencies, Other Public Agencies, Interested Organizations Lead Agency/Sponsor: City of Brea, Planning Division Project Title: Brea Mall Mixed Use Project NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Brea will prepare an environmental impact report (EIR) for the Brea Mall Mixed Use Project. The City is the lead agency for the project. The purpose of this notice is to (1) serve as a Notice of Preparation of an EIR pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines § 15082, (2) advise and solicit comments and suggestions regarding the scope and content of the EIR to be prepared for the project, and (3) notice the public scoping meeting. NOTICE OF PREPARATION: The City of Brea, as Lead Agency, requests that responsible and trustee agencies respond in a manner consistent with § 15082(b) of the CEQA Guidelines. Pursuant to CEQA § 21080.4, responsible agencies must submit any comments in response to this notice no later than 30 days after receipt. The public review period will commence on Friday, August 16, 2019, and will close on Monday, September 16, 2019. A copy of the NOP is available for review at the City of Brea offices and at the Brea Branch of the Orange County Public Library. City of Brea – Planning Division, Level 3 Brea Library 1 Civic Center Circle 1 Civic Center Circle, Level 1 Brea, CA 92821 Brea, CA 92821 The document can also be viewed electronically on the City's webpage at: www.cityofbrea.net/projectsinprocess WRITTEN COMMENTS: We ask that any person wishing to comment on the NOP provide written comments by the end of the public review period at 5:00 p.m., Monday, September 16, 2019, addressed to Jessica M.
    [Show full text]
  • General Background
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Earth and Mineral Sciences RESTRUCTURING DEPARTMENT STORE GEOGRAPHIES: THE LEGACIES OF EXPANSION AND CONSOLIDATION IN PHILADELPHIA’S JOHN WANAMAKER AND STRAWBRIDGE & CLOTHIER, 1860-1960 A Thesis in Geography by Wesley J Stroh © 2008 Wesley J Stroh Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science August 2008 The thesis of Wesley J. Stroh was reviewed and approved* by the following: Deryck W. Holdsworth Professor of Geography Thesis Adviser Roger M. Downs Professor of Geography Karl Zimmerer Professor of Geography Head of the Department of Geography *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. ABSTRACT RESTRUCTURING DEPARTMENT STORE GEOGRAPHIES: THE LEGACIES OF EXPANSION AND CONSOLIDATION IN PHILADELPHIA’S JOHN WANAMAKER AND STRAWBRIDGE & CLOTHIER, 1860-1960 Consolidation in the retail sector continues to restructure the department store, and the legacies of earlier forms of the department store laid the foundation for this consolidation. Using John Wanamaker’s and Strawbridge & Clothier, antecedents of Macy’s stores in Philadelphia, I undertake a case study of the development, through expansion and consolidation, which led to a homogenized department store retail market in the Philadelphia region. I employ archival materials, biographies and histories, and annual reports to document and characterize the development and restructuring Philadelphia’s department stores during three distinct phases: early expansions, the first consolidations into national corporations, and expansion through branch stores and into suburban shopping malls. In closing, I characterize the processes and structural legacies which department stores inherited by the latter half of the 20th century, as these legacies are foundational to national-scale retail homogenization.
    [Show full text]
  • Sol Price and the Founders of Fedmart and Price Club
    The Journal of Volume 56 Fall 2010 Number 4 • The Number Journal of San Diego History 2010 56 Fall Volume San Diego History Publication of The Journal of San Diego History is underwritten by a major grant from the Quest for Truth Foundation, established by the late James G. Scripps. Additional support is provided by “The Journal of San Diego Fund” of the San Diego Foundation and private donors. The San Diego History Center is a museum, education center, and research library founded as the San Diego Historical Society in 1928. Its activities are supported by: the City of San Diego’s Commission for Arts and Culture; the County of San Diego; individuals; foundations; corporations; fund raising events; PRESERVE A SAN DIEGO TREASURE membership dues; admissions; shop sales; and rights and reproduction fees. Your $100 contribution will help to create an endowment for Articles appearing in The Journal of San Diego History are abstracted and indexed in Historical Abstracts and America: History and Life. The Journal of San Diego History The paper in the publication meets the minimum requirements of American Please make your check payable to The San Diego Foundation. Indicate on National Standard for Information Science-Permanence of Paper for Printed the bottom of your check that your donation is for The Journal of San Diego Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. History Fund. The San Diego Foundation accepts contributions of $100 and up. Your contribution is tax-deductible. The San Diego Foundation 2508 Historic Decatur Road, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92106 (619) 235-2300 or (858) 385-1595 [email protected] Cover: A collage of photos featuring Sol Price and the founders of FedMart and Price Club.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveyla Survey Report Template
    Historic Resources Survey Report West Los Angeles Community Plan Area Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources Prepared by: SAPPHOS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Pasadena, CA August 15, 2012 Table of Contents Project Overview 1 SurveyLA Methodology Summary 1 Project Team 3 Survey Area 3 Designated Resources 10 Community Plan Area Survey Methodology 12 Summary of Findings 14 Summary of Property Types 14 Summary of Contexts and Themes 16 For Further Reading 44 Appendices Appendix A: Individual Resources Appendix B: Non-Parcel Resources Appendix C: Historic Districts & Planning Districts SurveyLA West Los Angeles Community Plan Area Project Overview This historic resources survey report (“Survey Report”) has been completed on behalf of the City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning’s Office of Historic Resources (OHR) for the SurveyLA historic resources survey of the West Los Angeles Community Plan Area (CPA). This project was undertaken from September 2011 to May 2012 by Sapphos Environmental, Inc. This Survey Report provides a summary of the work completed, including a description of the survey area; an overview of the field methodology; a summary of relevant contexts, themes, and property types; and complete lists of all surveyed resources. This Survey Report is intended to be used in conjunction with the SurveyLA Field Results Master Report (“Master Report”), which provides a detailed discussion of SurveyLA methodology and explains the terms used in this report and associated appendices. The Master Report, Survey Report, Appendices, and Results Map are available at www.surveyla.org. SurveyLA Methodology Summary Below is a brief summary of SurveyLA methodology.
    [Show full text]
  • (. ·Edts Denounce by K
    University of California, Irv in e Volume 1, No. 10 "A GREAT METROPOUTAN NEWSPAPER' 1967 Reagan's Proposals Insult UC (. ·eDts Denounce by K. C. WESTBURG In no instance would the new Governor's proposals have a favorable result without Budget Cut, Tuition There is much speculation that the Uni- first having an adverse one. versity of California is in serious trouble Students and educators throughout the In an emergency session Mon- he said. "We are facing a $62 over the recent state governmental propo· stat,e have taken personal offense to Rea- day at UCLA, the Board of Re- million deficit ... and the burden gan's actions via a barrage of letter pro- gents of the University of Cali- of this deficit depends on the bud- sals concerning tuition and a budget cut. fornia openly opposed Governor get requests for the next year." Rumors indicate that President of the Uni- tests, more outspoken actions, i.e., those Ronald Reagan's tuition threat and Smith suggested that the substi- versity Clark Kerr may soon be replaeed; of Fresno State College students, and the proposed UC budget cut. that the University is in danger of losing campus-wide support of protest movem.ents. tution of the $22 million special Although the Regents made no Regents fund for a corresponding some of its brilliant professors to competi- Student council members at UCLA voted formal statement refusing to con- amount allotted by the state, the tors because of the inevitable salary de- Monday on a formal resolution opposing_ sider the two governmental pro- initiation of a yearly tuition charge, creases i.n the face of th,e overall financial the Reagan move.
    [Show full text]
  • Master List of Mta Divisions Locations Stations 073009
    METRO DIVISIONS, LOCATIONS, TERMINALS FACILITY CODE NAME Address City State Zip DIVISIONS - LOCATIONS - TERMINALS DIVISION 0001 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 1130 E. 6TH ST LOS ANGELES CA 90021 DIVISION 0002 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 720 E. 15TH ST. LOS ANGELES CA 90021 DIVISION 0003 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 630 W. AVENUE 28 LOS ANGELES CA 90065 DIVISION 0004 NON-REVENUE VEHICLE DIVISION 7878 TELEGRAPH RD. DOWNEY CA 90240 DIVISION 0005 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 5425 VAN NESS AVE. LOS ANGELES CA 90062 DIVISION 0006 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 100 SUNSET AVE. VENICE CA 90291 DIVISION 0007 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 8800 SANTA MONICA BLVD. LOS ANGELES CA 90069 DIVISION 0008 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 9201 CANOGA AVE. CHATSWORTH CA 91311 DIVISION 0009 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 3449 SANTA ANITA AVE. EL MONTE CA 91731 DIVISION 0010 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 742 N. MISSION RD. LOS ANGELES CA 90033 DIVISION 0011 BLUE LINE MAIN YARD 4350 E. 208th ST. LONG BEACH CA 90810 DIVISION 0012 INACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 970 W. CHESTER PL. LONG BEACH CA 90813 LOCATION 0014 SOUTH PARK SHOPS 5413 AVALON BLVD. LOS ANGELES CA 90011 DIVISION 0015 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 11900 BRANFORD ST. SUN VALLEY CA 91352 TERMINAL 0017 MAPLE LOT - BUS LAYOVER 632 MAPLE AVE. LOS ANGELES CA 90014 DIVISION 0018 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 450 W. GRIFFITH ST. GARDENA CA 90248 TERMINAL 0019 EL MONTE STATION 3501 SANTA ANITA AVE. EL MONTE CA 91731 DIVISION 0020 RED LINE MAIN YARD 320 SO. SANTA FE AVE. LOS ANGELES CA 90013 DIVISION 0021 PASADENA GOLD LINE YARD(MIDWAY) 1800 BAKER ST.
    [Show full text]
  • 1987, Narrowed the Range of Alternatives to Five
    r. I II -- !"!._!i!k ____ ... lII....uuu__I:U uI - I-u-..-- . jII ------S uI,p I E$iIN;IaIi. I. - APPENDIX I TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A: APPENDIX TO CHAPTER ONE. A-i 1. SECTION 1: DEVELOPMENT OF CORE STUDY CANDIDATE ALIGNMENTS................................................. A-2 FIGURE A-i: SUMMARY OF CANDIDATE ALIGNMENTS ............... A-3 TABLE A-i: EVALUATION CATEGORIES AND CRITERIA ............ A-b APPENDIX B: ALIGNMENT PLANS AND PROFILES ........................... B-i APPENDIX C: STATION LOCATION PLANS ................................. C-i APPENDIX D: AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES.... D- 1 1. SECTION 1: BUS TRANSIT SERVICE ADJUSTMENTS ................ D -2 1.1 CANDIDATE ALIGNMENT 1 ................................. D-2 1.2 CANDIDATE ALIGNMENT 2 ................................. D-4 1. 3 CANDIDATE ALIGNMENT 3 ................................. D -4 1.4 CANDIDATE ALIGNMENT 4 ................................. D-6 1.5 CANDIDATE ALIGNMENT 5 ................................. D-8 2. SECTION 2: LAND USE CHARACTERISTICS ....................... D-11 TABLE 2-1: STATION AREA LAND USE PROFILES, YEAR 1986 ..... D-i2 TABLE 2-2: COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN REGIONAL CORE BY STATION AREA ................. D-15 FIGURE 2-1: UNION STATION AREA ............................ D-18 FIGURE 2-2: UNION CIVIC CENTER STATION AREA ............... D-19 FIGURE 2-3: FIFTH/HILL STATION AREA ....................... D-2O FIGURE 2-4: SEVENTH/FLOWER STATION AREA ................... D-21 FIGURE 2-5: WILSHIRE/ALVARADO ............................. D-22 FIGURE 2-6: WILSHIRE/VERMONT .............................. D-23 FIGURE 2-7: WILSHIRE/NORMANDIE ............................ 0-24 FIGURE 2-8: WILSHIRE/WESTERN .............................. D-25 FIGURE 2-9: BEVERLY/VERMONT ............................... 0-26 FIGURE 2-10: BEVERLY/WESTERN .............................. D- 27 FIGURE 2-11: WILSHIRE/CRENSHAW ............................ 0-28 FIGURE 2-12: WILSHIRE/LA BREA ............................. D-29 FIGURE 2-13: WILSHIRE/FAIRFAX ............................
    [Show full text]