DOCSLIB.ORG

Unit 7-Section View Drawings.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unit 7-Section View Drawings.Pdf UNIT 7 SECTION VIEWS 7.1 Introduction A section view is an orthographic projection view drawn to reveal internal or hidden features in an object. Section views are used to supplement standard orthographic view drawings in order to completely describe an object. They improve visualization of designs, clarify multiviews and facilitate dimensioning of drawings. Hence they are an important aspect of design and documentation. Section views are created by defining an imaginary cutting plane or planes on the object so that the observer can see the internal details. Hidden lines are generally not shown in sections. Hatch lines (also called section lines) are used to indicate solid materials that are cut through. A combination of hatch lines is called a pattern. A hatch pattern has certain attributes such as orientation and line spacing. Some hatch pattern types are used to represent specific materials or group of materials. Both part and assembly sections can be created. Sometimes, auxiliary section views may be needed for clarity. 7.2 Concept of Sections In orthographic projection, the standard projection planes are top (horizontal), front (frontal), side (profile). The frontal and profile planes are vertical, while the top is horizontal. Standard drawing views are created on these planes with preferred view directions. The view direction for the frontal and profile planes is horizontal while the view direction for the horizontal plane is vertical. Fig. 7.1a shows the standard front and top views a cylinder. Fig. 7.1b shows the same cylinder in mixed (standard, section, cut isometric) views with the front view converted to a section view. Several elements associated with the concept of sections are indicated in Fig. 7.1b. These are i) cutting plane line, ii) view direction, iii) removed portion, iv) retained portion, v) hatching, and vi) section caption or label. The cutting plane is an imaginary plane that passes through the object at a position of interest. It is represented by a line (the edge view of the section plane) in an adjacent view to the section view. In Fig. 7.1b, the cutting plane is vertical since its edge view is seen on the horizontal plane. Cutting planes can change direction within an object. The view direction is the line of sight or the direction an imaginary viewer is facing. The view direction is indicated by the arrow head and is perpendicular to the cutting plane. In Fig. 7.1b, the view direction is horizontal. The removed portion is the portion of an object that is assumed to have been removed in order to expose the interior. It is the cut- out portion of the object. The viewer is able to directly see the interior of the object when the cut-out is removed. Top view Top view Section view Front view a) Standard views b) Mixed views Fig. 7.1: Concept of sections The retained portion is the portion of an object that is assumed to be left in front of the viewer. The hatching is the pattern of hatch lines used to indicate solid material. The section label is the name given to the section or cutting plane. A very important difference between standard and section views is the replacement of hidden lines in standard views with visible lines in section views. This is very fundamental since it indicates the feature is now visible in a section view. Comparing the standard and mixed views of Fig. 7.1 shows the clarity advantage of section views. Another advantage of section views is that the visible lines from hidden lines in standard views can be used for 1 dimensioning; hidden lines are not used for dimensioning. When parts or assemblies have complex internal features, hidden lines in standard views become confusing, sections are then indispensable. 7.3 Cutting Plane Linestyles A cutting plane is represented by a line that shows the edge view of the cutting plane. A limited number of linestyles are used to represent cutting planes. In Fig. 7.2, the common linestyles for cutting planes are shown. They are a) thick center line, b) thick phantom line and c) broken visible line. The representation in c) is used if the cutting plane line would hide important details in a drawing. Each of these lines is usually joined to two arrows at their ends. The direction of the arrow is the viewer’s line of sight. Cutting plane lines are drawn in the view adjacent to the section view and may go beyond the boundary of the adjacent view. The thickness of a cutting plane line should be more than that of normal visible line. a) Thick centerline b) Thick phantom line c) Broken visible line Fig. 7.2: Cutting plane linestyles 7.4 Hatch Patterns Hatch lines are thin lines and when they are laid out in a specific angle and spacing, a hatch pattern is formed. A hatch pattern is always within a closed boundary. If there is a gap in an section, hatching will not occur when using CAD systems. Spacing of hatch lines should enhance readability. Depending on the size of the drawing, it may be between 1.5 mm (0.06 in) to 6 mm (0.25 in) in relatively small drawings. Likewise, the inclination of hatch lines should be guided by clarity. The angle of inclination for hatch lines normally varies between 15 o and 75 o. Popular angles are 15 o, 30 o, 45 o, 60 o, and 75 o. The angle 45 o is the default angle in most CAD software. Hatch lines must not be drawn or placed parallel to object lines or features in a section. In Fig. 7.3, the left column views have hatch lines parallel to some object features and they are, therefore, unacceptable. The acceptable representations are shown in the right column views. The angle of inclination of the hatch lines must be different from the angles of inclination of all the features forming the boundary of a hatch pattern. Fig.7.4 shows some examples of assembly hatch patterns. When components are assembled, the hatch patterns must not be parallel to object lines or features of hatch boundary. Also, hatch lines are inclined at different angles in each component in order to distinguish them. Fig. 7.3: Hatch pattern layout Fig. 7.4: Assembly hatch patterns 2 Conventionally, some hatch patterns are associated with specific materials. However, the proliferation of available materials today makes it impractical to have a unique hatch pattern for material types and grades. Thus selected material hatch patterns are in common use. In architectural drawings, some material hatch patterns are in popular use. Machine drawings use few material hatch patterns and ANSI 31 pattern for cast iron in Fig. 7.5 is the recommended today for machine drawings. This pattern may be used for all types of materials in machine drawings. Fig. 7.5 shows some material hatch pattern types. Fig. 7.5: Material type hatch patterns 7.5 Section View Representation and Placement Proper representation of section features is very important. Every feature directly exposed to the view needs to be included as visible entities in the section view. Gaps between feature segments must not be allowed. In Fig. 7.6, two section view representations are given. The left representation is right while the right representation is wrong because of gaps between the view segments. The line features omitted in the right representation are clearly visible in the indicated section plane. Section view position in a drawing has a definite relationship with the view direction. A section view should be placed behind the tail end of the view direction arrow. Fig. 7.7 illustrates the application of this principle for a) top section view, b) front section view, and c) right section view. Sufficient gap should be allowed between the section and the adjacent view it is derived from. This gap is very important because sufficient space must be made available for dimension placement. a) Right b) Wrong Fig. 7.6: Section view representation 3 a) Top section view b) Front section view c) Right section view Fig. 7.7: Placement of section views 7.6 Section View Types Section views may be classified in different ways. For our discussions, we shall group them into full, partial, and special section views. In full section views the full length of the principal dimension perpendicular to the view direction of the object is shown in section view. Hence the cutting plane or planes pass through the whole cross- section of the object. Partial section views do not reveal the whole sections, but show a portion of the interior. Special sections include auxiliary sections, assembly sections, and un-sectioned features. Full Section Views Full section views provide section views along the full length of the cross-section of an object. They include straight, offset, removed, revolved, and aligned section views. Each is briefly discussed below. Straight Sections A straight section is also called a full section by some authors. The cutting plane for a straight sections cuts right through the middle of the object so that one half of it is revealed after the second half is imagined removed. Thus a straight section is created from a single cutting plane. Straight sections are best for objects with an axis of symmetry. In multiview drawings, a section view can replace a standard view, and straight sections are commonly thus employed. Fig. 7.8 shows an example of a straight section view. Offset Sections Offset sections are similar to straight section except the cutting plane changes direction at 90 o at a time as it goes through the object.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Mathematics of Fels Sculptures
    THE MATHEMATICS OF FELS SCULPTURES DAVID FELS AND ANGELO B. MINGARELLI Abstract. We give a purely mathematical interpretation and construction of sculptures rendered by one of the authors, known herein as Fels sculptures. We also show that the mathematical framework underlying Ferguson's sculpture, The Ariadne Torus, may be considered a special case of the more general constructions presented here. More general discussions are also presented about the creation of such sculptures whether they be virtual or in higher dimensional space. Introduction Sculptors manifest ideas as material objects. We use a system wherein an idea is symbolized as a solid, governed by a set of rules, such that the sculpture is the expressed material result of applying rules to symbols. The underlying set of rules, being mathematical in nature, may thus lead to enormous abstraction and although sculptures are generally thought of as three dimensional objects, they can be created in four and higher dimensional (unseen) spaces with various projections leading to new and pleasant three dimensional sculptures. The interplay of mathematics and the arts has, of course, a very long and old history and we cannot begin to elaborate on this matter here. Recently however, the problem of creating mathematical programs for the construction of ribbed sculptures by Charles Perry was considered in [3]. For an insightful paper on topological tori leading to abstract art see also [5]. Spiral and twirling sculptures were analysed and constructed in [1]. This paper deals with a technique for sculpting works mostly based on wood (but not necessarily restricted to it) using abstract ideas based on twirls and tori, though again, not limited to them.
    [Show full text]
  • Sculptures in S3
    Sculptures in S3 Saul Schleimer and Henry Segerman∗ Abstract We describe the construction of a number of sculptures. Each is based on a geometric design native to the three- sphere: the unit sphere in four-dimensional space. Via stereographic projection, we transfer the design to three- dimensional space. All of the sculptures are then fabricated by the 3D printing service Shapeways. 1 Introduction The three-sphere, denoted S3, is a three-dimensional analog of the ordinary two-dimensional sphere, S2. In n+ general, the n–dimensional sphere is a subset of R 1 as follows: n n+1 2 2 2 S = f(x0;x1;:::;xn) 2 R j x0 + x1 + ··· + xn = 1g: Thus S2 can be seen as the usual unit sphere in R3. Visualising objects in dimensions higher than three is non-trivial. However for S3 we can use stereographic projection to reduce the dimension from four to three. n n n Let N = (0;:::;0;1) be the north pole of S . We define stereographic projection r : S − fNg ! R by x0 x1 xn−1 r(x0;x1;:::;xn) = ; ;:::; : 1 − xn 1 − xn 1 − xn See [1, page 27]. Figure 1a displays the one-dimensional case; this is also a cross-section of the n– dimensional case. For any point (x;y) 2 S1 − fNg draw the straight line L between N and (x;y). Then L meets R1 at a single point; this is r(x;y). N x 1−y (x;y) (a) Stereographic projection from S1 − (b) Two-dimensional stereographic projection applied to the Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mathematics of Mitering and Its Artful Application
    The Mathematics of Mitering and Its Artful Application Tom Verhoeff Koos Verhoeff Faculty of Mathematics and CS Valkenswaard, Netherlands Eindhoven University of Technology Den Dolech 2 5612 AZ Eindhoven, Netherlands Email: [email protected] Abstract We give a systematic presentation of the mathematics behind the classic miter joint and variants, like the skew miter joint and the (skew) fold joint. The latter is especially useful for connecting strips at an angle. We also address the problems that arise from constructing a closed 3D path from beams by using miter joints all the way round. We illustrate the possibilities with artwork making use of various miter joints. 1 Introduction The miter joint is well-known in the Arts, if only as a way of making fine frames for pictures and paintings. In its everyday application, a common problem with miter joints occurs when cutting a baseboard for walls meeting at an angle other than exactly 90 degrees. However, there is much more to the miter joint than meets the eye. In this paper, we will explore variations and related mathematical challenges, and show some artwork that this provoked. In Section 2 we introduce the problem domain and its terminology. A systematic mathematical treatment is presented in Section 3. Section 4 shows some artwork based on various miter joints. We conclude the paper in Section 5 with some pointers to further work. 2 Problem Domain and Terminology We will now describe how we encountered new problems related to the miter joint. To avoid misunderstand- ings, we first introduce some terminology. Figure 1: Polygon knot with six edges (left) and thickened with circular cylinders (right) 225 2.1 Cylinders, single and double beveling, planar and spatial mitering Let K be a one-dimensional curve in space, having finite length.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Section- Surface Area of a Prism- Surface Area of a Cylinder- Volume of a Prism
    S8.6 Volume Things to Learn (Key words, Notation & Formulae) Complete from your notes Radius- Diameter- Surface Area- Volume- Capacity- Prism- Cross-section- Surface area of a prism- Surface area of a cylinder- Volume of a prism- Section 1. Surface area of cuboids: Q1. Work out the surface area of each cuboid shown below: Q2. What is the surface area of a cuboid with the dimensions 4cm, 5cm and 6cm? Section 2. Volume of cuboids: Q1. Calculate the volume of these cuboids: S8.6 Volume Q2. Section 3. Definition of prisms: Label all the shapes and tick the ones that are prisms. Section 4. Surface area of prisms: Q1. Find the surface area of this triangular prism. Q2. Calculate the surface area of this cylinder. S8.6 Volume Q3. Cans are in cylindrical shapes. Each can has a diameter of 5.3 cm and a height of 11.4 cm. How much paper is required to make the label for the 20 cans? Section 5. Volume of a prism: Q1. Find the volume of this L-shaped prism. Q2. Calculate the volume of this prism. Give your answer to 2sf Section 6 . Volume of a cylinder: Q1. Calculate the volume of this cylinder. S8.6 Volume Q2. The diagram shows a piece of wood. The piece of wood is a prism of length 350cm. The cross-section of the prism is a semi-circle with diameter 1.2cm. Calculate the volume of the piece of wood. Give your answer to 3sf. Section 7. Problems involving volume and capacity: Q1. Sam buys a planter shown below.
    [Show full text]
  • Calculus Terminology
    AP Calculus BC Calculus Terminology Absolute Convergence Asymptote Continued Sum Absolute Maximum Average Rate of Change Continuous Function Absolute Minimum Average Value of a Function Continuously Differentiable Function Absolutely Convergent Axis of Rotation Converge Acceleration Boundary Value Problem Converge Absolutely Alternating Series Bounded Function Converge Conditionally Alternating Series Remainder Bounded Sequence Convergence Tests Alternating Series Test Bounds of Integration Convergent Sequence Analytic Methods Calculus Convergent Series Annulus Cartesian Form Critical Number Antiderivative of a Function Cavalieri’s Principle Critical Point Approximation by Differentials Center of Mass Formula Critical Value Arc Length of a Curve Centroid Curly d Area below a Curve Chain Rule Curve Area between Curves Comparison Test Curve Sketching Area of an Ellipse Concave Cusp Area of a Parabolic Segment Concave Down Cylindrical Shell Method Area under a Curve Concave Up Decreasing Function Area Using Parametric Equations Conditional Convergence Definite Integral Area Using Polar Coordinates Constant Term Definite Integral Rules Degenerate Divergent Series Function Operations Del Operator e Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Deleted Neighborhood Ellipsoid GLB Derivative End Behavior Global Maximum Derivative of a Power Series Essential Discontinuity Global Minimum Derivative Rules Explicit Differentiation Golden Spiral Difference Quotient Explicit Function Graphic Methods Differentiable Exponential Decay Greatest Lower Bound Differential
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Cross-Section Geometry and Channel Volume in Two Reaches of the Kankakee River in Illinois, 1959-94
    Changes in Cross-Section Geometry and Channel Volume in Two Reaches of the Kankakee River in Illinois, 1959-94 By PAUL J. TERRIO and JOHN E. NAZIMEK U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96 4261 Prepared in cooperation with the KANKAKEE COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Urbana, Illinois 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 221 N. Broadway Box 25286 Urbana, Illinois 61801 Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Abstract......................................................................................... 1 Introduction...................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Scope............................................................................ 3 Description of the Study Area................................................................... 4 Acknowledgments............................................................................ 4 Compilation and Measurement of Channel Cross-Section Geometry Data ..................................... 6 Momence Wetlands Reach ..................................................................... 6 Six-Mile Pool Reach .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Have You Ever Used Two Picture Planes to Draw a Single Perspective View?
    G e n e r a l a r t i c l e have you ever used Two Picture Planes to Draw a Single Perspective View? T o m á S G arc í A S A l gad o Apparently, the use of two picture planes to draw a single view has be a more versatile plane that in addition to representing not been attempted before. Most perspective methods, after Alberti, the appearance of 3D objects would also serve to measure take for granted the use of a single picture plane, disregarding its likely real dimensions? Such a plane, in Modular Perspective [3], use in dual positions. What if two picture planes are necessary to ABSTRACT draw a single view—for example, given a lack of spatial references at can be called the perspective plane (PPL). On the PPL one can ground level to estimate the distance between two objects? This article measure and draw directly the three modular coordinates of demonstrates that to draw the interior of a building from which another all points of interest of any given object in space. In other building can be seen about 190 m away, where the projection of such words, the PPL is a true three-dimensional plane, despite building on the first picture plane would be imprecise, it may be wise to actually being two-dimensional. use a second picture plane. This leads to consideration of how objects In addition, the PPL can be of any size, since all points are change shape as they move away from the viewer.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometry Module 3 Lesson 6 General Prisms and Cylinders and Their Cross-Sections
    GEOMETRY MODULE 3 LESSON 6 GENERAL PRISMS AND CYLINDERS AND THEIR CROSS-SECTIONS OPENING EXERCISE Complete the opening exercise on page 39 in your workbook. Include the hidden edges. Is a right rectangular prism hollow? That is, does it include the points inside? DISCUSSION Right Rectangular Prism: Let E and 퐸’ be two parallel planes.1 Let B be a rectangular region* in the plane E.2 At each point P of B, consider the 푃푃̅̅̅̅̅′ perpendicular to E, joining P to a point 푃′ of the plane 퐸’.3 The union of all these segments is called a right rectangular prism.4 * A rectangular region is the union of a rectangle and its interior. Definition Review Lateral Edge Lateral Face Base General Cylinder: Let E and 퐸’ be two parallel planes, let B be a region* in the plane E, and let L be a line that intersects E and 퐸’ but not B. At each point P of B, consider 푃푃̅̅̅̅̅′ parallel to L, joining P to a point 푃′ of the plane 퐸’. The union of all these segments is called a general cylinder with base B. * A region refers to a polygonal region (triangle, quadrilateral, pentagon, and hexagon), a circular region or regions that can be decomposed into such regions. MOD3 L6 1 Compare the definitions of right rectangular prism and general cylinder. How are they different? The definitions are similar. However, in the right rectangular prism, the region B is a rectangular region. In a general cylinder, the shape of B is not specified. Also, the segments (푃푃̅̅̅̅̅′) in the right rectangular prism must be perpendicular.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometry Module 3 Lesson 7 General Pyramids and Cones and Their Cross-Sections
    GEOMETRY MODULE 3 LESSON 7 GENERAL PYRAMIDS AND CONES AND THEIR CROSS-SECTIONS OPENING EXERCISE Complete the opening exercise on page 49 in your workbook. General Cylinders: 1 and 6 Prisms: 2 and 7 Figures that come to a point with a polygonal base: 4 and 5 Figures that come to a point with a curved base: 3 and 8 DISCUSSION Rectangular Pyramid: Given a rectangular region B in a plane E and a point V not in E, the rectangular pyramid with base B and vertex V is the collection of all segments VP for any point P in B. Image 4 from the Opening Exercise is an example of a rectangular pyramid. MOD3 L7 1 General Cone: Let B be a region in a plane E and V be a point not in E. The cone with base B and vertex V is the union of all 푉푃̅̅̅̅ for all point P in B. Images 2, 4, 5, and 8 from the Opening Exercise are examples of general cones. The definition for rectangular pyramid and general cone are essentially the same. What is the only difference? The only difference is that a rectangular pyramid has a rectangular base. A general cone can have any region for a base. Important Notes about Pyramids and Cones A general cone is named by its base. o A general cone with a disk as a base is called a circular cone. o A general cone with a polygonal base is called a pyramid. Examples of this include a rectangular pyramid or a triangular pyramid.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Basics of the Depiction in Drawings
    2. Basics of the Depiction in Drawings Most of the articles that shall be subject to the protection under the Design Act are in the form of a three-dimensional shape. However, when filing an application for design registration concerning a three-dimensional form, applicants must represent it in drawings depicted on a two-dimensional plane, and so on. In other words, the object of a design right is not a real three-dimensional shape, but a three-dimensional form depicted on such two-dimensional drawings. Therefore, the drawing methods are defined in details so that the third party may also correctly understand the form, which is the object of the right. Thus, it is necessary to depict drawings, etc. according to the formulated drawing methods so that the form, which is the object of a design right, may be understood correctly. It is also necessary to depict necessary drawings so that the entire form, which is the object of a design right, may be understood as being specified for design registration. In addition, views that help in understanding of the design need to be depicted, where necessary (Drawings for explaining the form or the state of use, in which lines, etc. that do not constitute the design in the application are added, shall be indicated as “Reference view of yy” to be distinguished from the drawings that depict only constitute elements of the design in the application). The basics of how to depict drawings will be explained below. 14 A. Drawings necessary for specifying the form 2A.1 Types of drawing formulated in the Form and basic points to be noted (1) The types of drawings necessary for specifying the form (i) In cases where the design is the form of a three-dimensional shape, in principle, the front view, the rear view, the left side view, the right side view, the top view and the bottom view that have been prepared at the same scale by the orthographic projection method, regarded as a set of drawings (hereinafter referred to as “a set of six views), need to be prepared.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1204.4952V2 [Math.HO] 17 May 2012
    Sculptures in S3 Saul Schleimer Henry Segerman∗ Mathematics Institute Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Warwick University of Melbourne Coventry CV4 7AL Parkville VIC 3010 United Kingdom Australia [email protected] [email protected] Abstract We construct a number of sculptures, each based on a geometric design native to the three-dimensional sphere. Using stereographic projection we transfer the design from the three-sphere to ordinary Euclidean space. All of the sculptures are then fabricated by the 3D printing service Shapeways. 1 Introduction The three-sphere, denoted S3, is a three-dimensional analog of the ordinary two-dimensional sphere, S2. In n+ general, the n–dimensional sphere is a subset of Euclidean space, R 1, as follows: n n+1 2 2 2 S = f(x0;x1;:::;xn) 2 R j x0 + x1 + ··· + xn = 1g: Thus S2 can be seen as the usual unit sphere in R3. Visualising objects in dimensions higher than three is non-trivial. However for S3 we can use stereographic projection to reduce the dimension from four to three. n n n Let N = (0;:::;0;1) be the north pole of S . We define stereographic projection r : S − fNg ! R by x0 x1 xn−1 r(x0;x1;:::;xn) = ; ;:::; : 1 − xn 1 − xn 1 − xn See [1, page 27]. Figure 1a displays stereographic projection in dimension one. For any point (x;y) 2 S1 − fNg draw the straight line L through N and (x;y). Then L meets R1 at a single point; this is r(x;y). Notice that the figure is also a two-dimensional cross-section of stereographic projection in any dimension.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Sections of Three-Dimensional Objects
    Regents Exam Questions Name: ________________________ G.GMD.B.4: Cross-Sections of Three-Dimensional Objects www.jmap.org G.GMD.B.4: Cross-Sections of Three-Dimensional Objects 1 A right hexagonal prism is shown below. A 4 A plane intersects a hexagonal prism. The plane is two-dimensional cross section that is perpendicular perpendicular to the base of the prism. Which to the base is taken from the prism. two-dimensional figure is the cross section of the plane intersecting the prism? 1) triangle 2) trapezoid 3) hexagon 4) rectangle 5 A two-dimensional cross section is taken of a Which figure describes the two-dimensional cross three-dimensional object. If this cross section is a section? triangle, what can not be the three-dimensional 1) triangle object? 2) rectangle 1) cone 3) pentagon 2) cylinder 4) hexagon 3) pyramid 4) rectangular prism 2 A right cylinder is cut perpendicular to its base. The shape of the cross section is a 6 Which figure(s) below can have a triangle as a 1) circle two-dimensional cross section? 2) cylinder I. cone 3) rectangle II. cylinder 4) triangular prism III. cube IV. square pyramid 1) I, only 2) IV, only 3) I, II, and IV, only 3 The cross section of a regular pyramid contains the 4) I, III, and IV, only altitude of the pyramid. The shape of this cross section is a 1) circle 2) square 3) triangle 4) rectangle 1 Regents Exam Questions Name: ________________________ G.GMD.B.4: Cross-Sections of Three-Dimensional Objects www.jmap.org 7 Which figure can have the same cross section as a 8 William is drawing pictures of cross sections of the sphere? right circular cone below.
    [Show full text]