DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 182/Thursday, September 19, 2002

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 182/Thursday, September 19, 2002 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 182 / Thursday, September 19, 2002 / Notices 59061 Dated: September 13, 2002. is necessary for the proper performance the fiscal year. It is distributed to our Michael W. Carlton, of the functions of the agency, including partners in state, Federal, and other Chief Information Officer (I). whether the information shall have agencies; to researchers; schools of [FR Doc. 02–23791 Filed 9–18–02; 8:45 am] practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the public health; and other interested BILLING CODE 6820–EP–M agency’s estimate of the burden of the groups. It is also available on ATSDR’s proposed collection of information; (c) Internet website and by request. ways to enhance the quality, utility, and ATSDR staff has developed a reader DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND clarity of the information to be survey to get readers’ opinions and HUMAN SERVICES collected; and (d) ways to minimize the suggestions about the agency annual burden of the collection of information report. The survey will be inserted and Centers for Disease Control and on respondents, including through the mailed with each annual report. An Prevention use of automated collection techniques online version of the reader survey will or other forms of information be available on the ATSDR website. The [60Day–02–79] technology. Send comments to Seleda survey will collect information on the Proposed Data Collections Submitted Perryman, CDC Assistant Reports readability and effectiveness of the for Public Comment and Clearance Officer, 1600 Clifton Road, report, the affiliation of the readers, and Recommendations MS D–24, Atlanta, GA 30333. any suggestions on improving Proposed Project: Reader Evaluation readability or content. In compliance with the requirement of ATSDR Agency Profile and Annual It is anticipated that the reader survey of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Report—New—The Agency for Toxic will provide important feedback that Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for Substances and Disease Registry will enable ATSDR staff to better tailor opportunity for public comment on (ATSDR) publishes an agency profile future reports to the needs of its readers. proposed data collection projects, the and annual report every fiscal year to Gathering reader feedback will ensure Centers for Disease Control and highlight the agency’s major activities that appropriate information is included Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic and findings. The report provides a in the document to provide a good summaries of proposed projects. To record of the agency’s significant overview of the agency’s activities. The request more information on the accomplishments in meeting its information will be used to improve proposed projects or to obtain a copy of mandates under the Comprehensive customer satisfaction related to the the data collection plans and Environmental Response, annual report. There will be no cost to instruments, call the CDC Reports Compensation, and Liability Act respondents, as postage will be pre- Clearance Officer on (404) 498–1210. (CERCLA), as amended, and other paid. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether Federal statutes. The annual report gives The annual burden hours are the proposed collection of information a snapshot of the agency’s activities for estimated to be 41. Number of re- Avg. burden Respondents Number of re- sponses/re- response Total burden spondents spondent (in hours) (in hours) Academia ......................................................................................................... 100 1 5/60 8 State and Local Government Staff .................................................................. 100 1 5/60 8 General Public ................................................................................................. 300 1 5/60 25 Total .......................................................................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................ 41 Dated: September 13, 2002. Retraction: In the Federal Register DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND Nancy E. Cheal, issue of Thursday, September 5, 2002, HUMAN SERVICES Acting Deputy Director for Policy, Planning Volume 67: No. 172, on page 56845– and Evaluation, Centers for Disease Control 56846, we wish to retract the emergency Health Resources and Services and Prevention. notice announcing the Public Administration [FR Doc. 02–23793 Filed 9–18–02; 8:45 am] Information Collection Requirements National Vaccine Injury Compensation BILLING CODE 4163–18–P Submitted to the Office of Management Program; List of Petitions Received and Budget (OMB) for the ‘‘Pharmacy Plus Template for Low Income Seniors AGENCY: Health Resources and Services DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND under Medicaid’’, form number CMS– Administration, HHS. HUMAN SERVICES 10067. ACTION: Notice. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Dated: September 10, 2002. SUMMARY: The Health Resources and Services John P. Burke, Services Administration (HRSA) is Paperwork Reduction Act Team Leader, CMS publishing this notice of petitions [Document Identifier: CMS–10067] Reports Clearance Officer, Office of Strategic received under the National Vaccine Agency Information Collection Operations and Regulatory Affairs, Division Injury Compensation Program (‘‘the Activities: Submission for OMB of Regulations Development and Issuances. Program’’), as required by Section Review; Comment Request; Retraction [FR Doc. 02–23769 Filed 9–18–02; 8:45 am] 2112(b)(2) of the Public Health Service BILLING CODE 4120–03–P (PHS) Act, as amended. While the ACTION: Notice; retraction. Secretary of Health and Human Services is named as the respondent in all SUMMARY: In the Federal Register issue proceedings brought by the filing of of Thursday, September 5, 2002, make petitions for compensation under the the following retraction: Program, the United States Court of VerDate Sep<04>2002 22:38 Sep 18, 2002 Jkt 197001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM 19SEN1 59062 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 182 / Thursday, September 19, 2002 / Notices Federal Claims is charged by statute submit relevant, written information’’ 6. Angela and Bruce Hewett on behalf of with responsibility for considering and relating to the following: Hunter Blake Hewett, Fort Worth, Texas— acting upon the petitions. Court of Federal Claims Number 02–0257V 1. The existence of evidence ‘‘that 7. Danny W. Caldwell, Statesville, North FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For there is not a preponderance of the Carolina—Court of Federal Claims Number information about requirements for evidence that the illness, disability, 02–0258V filing petitions, and the Program in injury, condition, or death described in 8. Elizabeth and James O’Hea on behalf of general, contact the Clerk, United States the petition is due to factors unrelated Evan James O’Hea, Rockford, Illinois— Court of Federal Claims, 717 Madison to the administration of the vaccine Court of Federal Claims Number 02–0259V described in the petition,’’ and 9. Tima Mehok on behalf of Anthony Edward Place, NW., Washington, DC 20005, Rodriguez, Robbinsdale, Minnesota—Court (202) 219–9657. For information on 2. Any allegation in a petition that the of Federal Claims Number 02–0260V HRSA’s role in the Program, contact the petitioner either: 10. Anne and Anthony Christie on behalf of Director, National Vaccine Injury (a) ‘‘Sustained, or had significantly Anthony Neil Christie, Houston, Texas— Compensation Program, 5600 Fishers aggravated, any illness, disability, Court of Federal Claims Number 02–0262V Lane, Room 8A–46, Rockville, MD injury, or condition not set forth in the 11. Virginia and Carl Williams on behalf of 20857; (301) 443–6593. Carl Houston Williams, Mount Sterling, Table but which was caused by’’ one of Kentucky—Court of Federal Claims SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The the vaccines referred to in the Table, or Number 02–0263V Program provides a system of no-fault (b) ‘‘Sustained, or had significantly 12. Deanna and Randy Beinlich on behalf of compensation for certain individuals aggravated, any illness, disability, Allan Beinlich, Weatherford, Texas—Court who have been injured by specified injury, or condition set forth in the of Federal Claims Number 02–0264V Table the first symptom or 13. Terrilyn Singer on behalf of Zachary childhood vaccines. Subtitle 2 of Title Stephen Singer, Allentown, XXI of the PHS Act, 42 U.S.C. 300aa– manifestation of the onset or significant Pennsylvania—Court of Federal Claims 10 et seq., provides that those seeking aggravation of which did not occur Number 02–0265V compensation are to file a petition with within the time period set forth in the 14. Carla and Jeffrey Barres on behalf of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and to Table but which was caused by a Morgan Ruth Barres, San Antonio, Texas— serve a copy of the petition on the vaccine’’ referred to in the Table. Court of Federal Claims Number 02–0266V Secretary of Health and Human This notice will also serve as the 15. Chen-Zhi Jian and Mei-Chin Lai on behalf Services, who is named as the of Gerald Lai Jian, Falls Church, Virginia— special master’s invitation to all Court of Federal Claims Number 02–0267V respondent in each proceeding. The interested persons to submit written 16. Erica Goodman on behalf of Aaron Secretary has delegated his information relevant to the issues Rashad Jacobs, Baltimore, Maryland— responsibility under the Program to described above in the case of the Court of Federal Claims Number 02–0268V HRSA. The Court is directed by statute petitions listed below.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CODEBOOK.Txt 2/16/2012
    UTEX0018_CODEBOOK.txt 2/16/2012 ============================================================================== == Project Code : UTEX0018 Project Name : Texas Tribune Prepared for : Jim Henson and Daron Shaw Interviews : 800 Field Period : 2/8/2012 - 2/15 /2012 Project Manager : Sam Luks - 650-462-8009 ============================================================================== == Matching and Weighting Polimetrix interviewed 909 respondents who were then matched down to a sample of 800 to produce the final dataset. The respondents were matched on gender , age , race , education , party identification , ideology and political interest. Polimetrix then weighted the matched set of survey respondents to known marginals for the registered voters of Texas from the 2008 Current Population survey and the 2007 Pew Religious Life Survey. Variable List ============================================================================== == Name Description ---- ----------- caseid Case ID weight Case Weight race Race hispanic Hispanic descent langpref Language Q1 Texas votereg birthyr Birth year gender Gender educ Education Q2 Political interest Q3 Texas Vote Freq Q4 Most Important Problem Q5 Most Important problem , Texas Q6 Retrospective Assessments , Obama Q7 Retrospective Assessments , Congress Q8 Rick Perry , Governor Q9 Country direction Q10 National Economy Q11 Texas direction Q12 Personal Econ Q13 Vote 2012 Q14 Republican Primary Q14A Republican Primary Force Q15 Republican Primary Satisfaction Q16_new Republican Primary Candidate Traits Q17 Republican
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report for the Texas Judiciary
    ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE TEXAS JUDICIARY FISCAL YEAR 2011 ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE TEXAS JUDICIARY FISCAL YEAR 2011 Published By OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION CARL REYNOLDS, ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR 205 WEST 14TH STREET, SUITE 600 POST OFFICE BOX 12066 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2066 (512) 463-1625 FAX: (512) 463-1648 WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV MARCH 2012 Table of Contents TEXAS COURTS: A DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY Court Structure and Function Court Structure Chart .....................................................................................................................................2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................3 Funding of the Texas Judicial Branch ...........................................................................................................3 Court Structure and Function ........................................................................................................................5 Judicial Administration ..................................................................................................................................9 Court Reorganization Bill ...............................................................................................................................10 Notes ..................................................................................................................................................................10 Information About Texas Judges Judicial Qualifications
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report for the Texas Judiciary
    ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE TEXAS JUDICIARY FISCAL YEAR 2011 ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE TEXAS JUDICIARY FISCAL YEAR 2011 Published By OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION CARL REYNOLDS, ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR 205 WEST 14TH STREET, SUITE 600 POST OFFICE BOX 12066 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2066 (512) 463-1625 FAX: (512) 463-1648 WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV MARCH 2012 Table of Contents TEXAS COURTS: A DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY Court Structure and Function Court Structure Chart .....................................................................................................................................2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................3 Funding of the Texas Judicial Branch ...........................................................................................................3 Court Structure and Function ........................................................................................................................5 Judicial Administration ..................................................................................................................................9 Court Reorganization Bill ...............................................................................................................................10 Notes ..................................................................................................................................................................10 Information About Texas Judges Judicial Qualifications
    [Show full text]
  • Poll Crosstabs
    University of Texas / Texas Tribune Texas Statewide Survey Crosstabs Political Interest 3 – 7 Texas Voting Frequency 8 - 12 Approval Ratings Obama Approval [JBNOTE: Option + Tab] 13 - 17 Congress Approval 18 – 22 Perry Approval 23 – 27 Mood of Texans Country Right Direction/Wrong Track 28 – 31 National Economy Retrospection 31 – 36 Texas Right Direction/Wrong Track 36 – 39 Personal Economic Retrospection 40 – 44 Horse-Race Items 2012 Primary Choice 45 – 48 GOP Presidential Primary Choice 48 – 53 GOP Presidential Primary Choice Satisfaction 53 - 58 GOP Presidential Primary Choice Decision Criteria 58 – 63 GOP Senate Primary 64 – 73 GOP Lt. Governor Primary 74 - 78 Dem. Senate Primary 79 – 83 Gingrich-Obama Hypothetical Matchup 84 – 88 Romney-Obama Hypothetical Matchup 89 – 93 Santorum-Obama Hypothetical Matchup 94 – 98 Paul-Obama Hypothetical Matchup 99 – 103 U.S. Senate General Election – Generic Ballot 104 – 108 U.S. Congress Generic Ballot with Tea Party Option 109 – 113 Perry Reelection Support 113 – 118 Mormon Vote 118 – 121 Candidate Preference – Descriptive Representation 122 – 126 Candidate Preference – Substantive Representation 127 – 131 Miscellaneous National Politics Items Romney Favorability 132 – 136 Gingrich Favorability 137 – 141 Paul Favorability 142 – 146 Santorum Favorability 147 - 151 Field Dates: February 8-15, 2012 N=800 Adults Margin of error: +/- 3.46% for full sample 1 of 219 University of Texas / Texas Tribune Texas Statewide Survey Crosstabs Obama Favorability 152 – 156 Perry Favorability 157 – 161 Tea Party
    [Show full text]
  • UT-Austin/Texas Tribune – Texas Statewide Survey, February 2012 Page 1 of 15
    University of Texas / Texas Tribune Texas Statewide Survey - Day 2 Summary Field Dates: February 8-15, 2012 N=800 Adults Margin of error: +/- 3.46% unless otherwise noted Interest and Engagement Q1. Are you registered to vote in the state of Texas? 1. Yes, registered 100% Q2. Generally speaking, would you say that you are extremely interested in politics and public affairs, somewhat interested, not very interested, or not at all interested? 1. Extremely interested 53% 2. Somewhat interested 36% 3. Not very interested 8% 4. Not at all interested 2% 5. Don’t know 1% Q3. There are many elections in the state of Texas. Furthermore, many people intend to vote in a given election, but sometimes personal and professional circumstances keep them from the polls. Thinking back over the past two or three years, would you say that you voted in all elections, almost all, about half, one or two, or none at all? 1. Every election 31% 2. Almost every election 37% 3. About half 12% 4. One or two 10% 5. None 7% 6. Don’t know/Refused/NA 2% UT-Austin/Texas Tribune – Texas Statewide Survey, February 2012 Page 1 of 15 Retrospective Assessments Q6. How would you rate the job Barack Obama has done as president? Would you say that you… 1. Approve strongly 19% 2. Approve somewhat 20% 3. Neither approve nor disapprove 5% 4. Disapprove somewhat 6% 5. Disapprove strongly 49% 6. Don’t know 1% Q7. Overall, how do you rate the job the U.S. Congress is doing? 1. Approve strongly 1% 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Salsa2sjournal 683..728
    SENATE JOURNAL EIGHTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE Ð REGULAR SESSION AUSTIN, TEXAS PROCEEDINGS THIRTIETH DAY (Wednesday, March 23, 2011) The Senate met at 11:09 a.m. pursuant to adjournment and was called to order by the President. The roll was called and the following Senators were present:iiBirdwell, Carona, Davis, Deuell, Duncan, Ellis, Eltife, Estes, Fraser, Gallegos, Harris, Hegar, Hinojosa, Huffman, Jackson, Lucio, Nelson, Nichols, Ogden, Patrick, Rodriguez, Seliger, Shapiro, Uresti, VanideiPutte, Watson, Wentworth, West, Whitmire, Williams, Zaffirini. The President announced that a quorum of the Senate was present. Father Jayme Mathias, Cristo Rey Catholic Church, Austin, offered the invocation as follows: All powerful God, we thank You for the many gifts You continue to shower upon us:iiYour gifts of life and health, family and friends, and the great responsibility of shepherding the people of this great state. We ask You to bless us today as we begin this legislative session. Enlighten us, that we might act wisely to ensure the brightest possible future for the people of our state. We ask this in Your name, You who live and reign forever and ever. Amen. Senator Whitmire moved that the reading of the Journal of the proceedings of the previous day be dispensed with and the Journal be approved as printed. The motion prevailed without objection. PHYSICIAN OF THE DAY Senator Nichols was recognized and presented Dr. Keith Miller of Center as the Physician of the Day. The Senate welcomed Dr. Miller and thanked him for his participation in the Physician of the Day program sponsored by the Texas Academy of Family Physicians.
    [Show full text]
  • UT-Austin/Texas Tribune – Texas Statewide Survey, February 2012 Page 1 of 21
    University of Texas / Texas Tribune Texas Statewide Survey Field Dates: February 8-15, 2012 N=800 Adults Margin of error: +/- 3.46% unless otherwise noted Interest and Engagement Q1. Are you registered to vote in the state of Texas? 1. Yes, registered 100% Q2. Generally speaking, would you say that you are extremely interested in politics and public affairs, somewhat interested, not very interested, or not at all interested? 1. Extremely interested 53% 2. Somewhat interested 36% 3. Not very interested 8% 4. Not at all interested 2% 5. Don’t know 1% Q3. There are many elections in the state of Texas. Furthermore, many people intend to vote in a given election, but sometimes personal and professional circumstances keep them from the polls. Thinking back over the past two or three years, would you say that you voted in all elections, almost all, about half, one or two, or none at all? 1. Every election 31% 2. Almost every election 37% 3. About half 12% 4. One or two 10% 5. None 7% 6. Don’t know/Refused/NA 2% UT-Austin/Texas Tribune – Texas Statewide Survey, February 2012 Page 1 of 21 Most Important Problem Q4. What would you say is the most important problem facing this country today? [Randomize] 1. The economy 30% 2. Unemployment/jobs 10% 3. Federal spending/national debt 17% 4. Political corruption/leadership 11% 5. Health care 4% 6. Moral decline 5% 7. National security/terrorism 1% 8. Immigration 3% 9. Taxes 1% 10. Gas prices 3% 11. Energy 0% 12. Gay marriage 0% 13.
    [Show full text]