DOCSLIB.ORG

Poll Crosstabs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Poll Crosstabs University of Texas / Texas Tribune Texas Statewide Survey Crosstabs Political Interest 3 – 7 Texas Voting Frequency 8 - 12 Approval Ratings Obama Approval [JBNOTE: Option + Tab] 13 - 17 Congress Approval 18 – 22 Perry Approval 23 – 27 Mood of Texans Country Right Direction/Wrong Track 28 – 31 National Economy Retrospection 31 – 36 Texas Right Direction/Wrong Track 36 – 39 Personal Economic Retrospection 40 – 44 Horse-Race Items 2012 Primary Choice 45 – 48 GOP Presidential Primary Choice 48 – 53 GOP Presidential Primary Choice Satisfaction 53 - 58 GOP Presidential Primary Choice Decision Criteria 58 – 63 GOP Senate Primary 64 – 73 GOP Lt. Governor Primary 74 - 78 Dem. Senate Primary 79 – 83 Gingrich-Obama Hypothetical Matchup 84 – 88 Romney-Obama Hypothetical Matchup 89 – 93 Santorum-Obama Hypothetical Matchup 94 – 98 Paul-Obama Hypothetical Matchup 99 – 103 U.S. Senate General Election – Generic Ballot 104 – 108 U.S. Congress Generic Ballot with Tea Party Option 109 – 113 Perry Reelection Support 113 – 118 Mormon Vote 118 – 121 Candidate Preference – Descriptive Representation 122 – 126 Candidate Preference – Substantive Representation 127 – 131 Miscellaneous National Politics Items Romney Favorability 132 – 136 Gingrich Favorability 137 – 141 Paul Favorability 142 – 146 Santorum Favorability 147 - 151 Field Dates: February 8-15, 2012 N=800 Adults Margin of error: +/- 3.46% for full sample 1 of 219 University of Texas / Texas Tribune Texas Statewide Survey Crosstabs Obama Favorability 152 – 156 Perry Favorability 157 – 161 Tea Party Influence on GOP 162 – 166 Perry’s Influence on Texas’ Image 167 - 171 State and National Policy Items Support for Pathway to Citizenship for Illegal Immigrants 172 – 176 Priority for Immigration Policy – Skills/Family 177 - 180 Views on Abortion 180 – 185 Views on Level of Services that Government Should Provide 185 – 190 Favor or Oppose Creation of a Redistricting Commission 190 – 193 Attitudes towards Gay Marriage/Civil Unions 194 – 198 Attitudes towards Assisted Suicide 199 – 202 Death Penalty Support 202 – 207 Jealousy of the Wealth 207 – 210 Attitudes towards Tax Share of the Wealthy 211 – 214 Cause of Wealth 214 - Polimetrix interviewed 909 respondents who were then matched down to a sample of 800 to produce the final dataset. The respondents were matched on gender, age, race, education, party identification, ideology and political interest. Polimetrix then weighted the matched set of survey respondents to known marginals for the registered voters of Texas from the 2008 Current Population survey and the 2007 Pew Religious Life Survey. Field Dates: February 8-15, 2012 N=800 Adults Margin of error: +/- 3.46% for full sample 2 of 219 University of Texas / Texas Tribune Texas Statewide Survey Crosstabs | Ideology Political interest | Extr. Lib. 2 3 Middle 5 6 Extr. Con.| Total ----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+---------- Extremely interested | 26 57 39 68 53 130 91 | 464 | 68.42 67.86 55.71 35.42 50.00 67.71 79.13 | 58.22 ----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+---------- Somewhat interested | 10 25 25 89 46 56 20 | 271 | 26.32 29.76 35.71 46.35 43.40 29.17 17.39 | 34.00 ----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+---------- Not very interested | 1 2 6 23 7 5 3 | 47 | 2.63 2.38 8.57 11.98 6.60 2.60 2.61 | 5.90 ----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+---------- Not at all interested | 1 0 0 8 0 1 1 | 11 | 2.63 0.00 0.00 4.17 0.00 0.52 0.87 | 1.38 ----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+---------- Don't know | 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 | 4 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 | 0.50 ----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+---------- Total | 38 84 70 192 106 192 115 | 797 | 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 | 100.00 | 7 point Party ID Political interest | Strong De Not very Lean Demo Independe Lean Repu Not very Strong Re None of t None of t | Total ----------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+---------- Extremely interested | 99 30 37 25 99 33 137 1 1 | 462 | 55.62 34.09 62.71 41.67 73.88 42.86 72.87 11.11 100.00 | 58.19 ----------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+---------- Somewhat interested | 67 44 21 23 31 37 46 2 0 | 271 | 37.64 50.00 35.59 38.33 23.13 48.05 24.47 22.22 0.00 | 34.13 ----------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+---------- Not very interested | 9 13 1 7 4 5 4 3 0 | 46 | 5.06 14.77 1.69 11.67 2.99 6.49 2.13 33.33 0.00 | 5.79 ----------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+---------- Not at all interested | 3 1 0 3 0 2 1 1 0 | 11 | 1.69 1.14 0.00 5.00 0.00 2.60 0.53 11.11 0.00 | 1.39 ----------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+---------- Don't know | 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 | 4 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.22 0.00 | 0.50 ----------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+---------- Total | 178 88 59 60 134 77 188 9 1 | 794 | 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 | 100.00 Field Dates: February 8-15, 2012 N=800 Adults Margin of error: +/- 3.46% for full sample 3 of 219 University of Texas / Texas Tribune Texas Statewide Survey Crosstabs | Tea Party popularity Political interest | Republica Democrati Tea Party Don't kno | Total ----------------------+--------------------------------------------+---------- Extremely interested | 92 156 135 82 | 465 | 67.65 52.35 72.97 45.30 | 58.13 ----------------------+--------------------------------------------+---------- Somewhat interested | 40 121 46 66 | 273 | 29.41 40.60 24.86 36.46 | 34.12 ----------------------+--------------------------------------------+---------- Not very interested | 2 19 3 23 | 47 | 1.47 6.38 1.62 12.71 | 5.88 ----------------------+--------------------------------------------+---------- Not at all interested | 2 2 1 6 | 11 | 1.47 0.67 0.54 3.31 | 1.38 ----------------------+--------------------------------------------+---------- Don't know | 0 0 0 4 | 4 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.21 | 0.50 ----------------------+--------------------------------------------+---------- Total | 136 298 185 181 | 800 | 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 | 100.00 | Education Political interest | No HS High scho Some coll 2-year 4-year Post-grad | Total ----------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------+---------- Extremely interested | 11 107 130 35 130 52 | 465 | 47.83 47.35 59.36 55.56 68.06 66.67 | 58.13 ----------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------+---------- Somewhat interested | 9 96 69 25 50 24 | 273 | 39.13 42.48 31.51 39.68 26.18 30.77 | 34.12 ----------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------+---------- Not very interested | 1 18 15 3 8 2 | 47 | 4.35 7.96 6.85 4.76 4.19 2.56 | 5.88 ----------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------+---------- Not at all interested | 2 5 1 0 3 0 | 11 | 8.70 2.21 0.46 0.00 1.57 0.00 | 1.38 ----------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------+---------- Don't know | 0 0 4 0 0 0 | 4 | 0.00 0.00 1.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 | 0.50 ----------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------+---------- Total | 23 226 219 63 191 78 | 800 | 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 | 100.00 Field Dates: February 8-15, 2012 N=800 Adults Margin of error: +/- 3.46% for full sample 4 of 219 University of Texas / Texas Tribune Texas Statewide Survey Crosstabs | Religion participation Political interest | More than Once a we A few tim Once or t Never | Total ----------------------+-------------------------------------------------------+---------- Extremely interested | 90 75 59 127 113 | 464 | 61.22 63.03 56.73 57.99 53.81 | 58.07 ----------------------+-------------------------------------------------------+---------- Somewhat interested | 46 37 39 75 76 | 273 | 31.29 31.09 37.50 34.25 36.19 | 34.17 ----------------------+-------------------------------------------------------+---------- Not very interested | 6 7 4 13 17 | 47 | 4.08 5.88 3.85 5.94 8.10 | 5.88 ----------------------+-------------------------------------------------------+---------- Not at all interested | 4 0 1 3 3 | 11 | 2.72 0.00 0.96 1.37 1.43 | 1.38 ----------------------+-------------------------------------------------------+---------- Don't know | 1 0 1 1 1 | 4 | 0.68 0.00 0.96 0.46 0.48 | 0.50 ----------------------+-------------------------------------------------------+---------- Total | 147 119 104 219 210 | 799 | 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 | 100.00 | Race Political interest | White / B Black Hispanic Asian Native Am Mixed Other Middle Ea | Total ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+---------- Extremely interested | 315 45 76 5 6 9 8 1 | 465 | 62.75 45.45 51.01 45.45 66.67 56.25 72.73 33.33 | 58.13
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CODEBOOK.Txt 2/16/2012
    UTEX0018_CODEBOOK.txt 2/16/2012 ============================================================================== == Project Code : UTEX0018 Project Name : Texas Tribune Prepared for : Jim Henson and Daron Shaw Interviews : 800 Field Period : 2/8/2012 - 2/15 /2012 Project Manager : Sam Luks - 650-462-8009 ============================================================================== == Matching and Weighting Polimetrix interviewed 909 respondents who were then matched down to a sample of 800 to produce the final dataset. The respondents were matched on gender , age , race , education , party identification , ideology and political interest. Polimetrix then weighted the matched set of survey respondents to known marginals for the registered voters of Texas from the 2008 Current Population survey and the 2007 Pew Religious Life Survey. Variable List ============================================================================== == Name Description ---- ----------- caseid Case ID weight Case Weight race Race hispanic Hispanic descent langpref Language Q1 Texas votereg birthyr Birth year gender Gender educ Education Q2 Political interest Q3 Texas Vote Freq Q4 Most Important Problem Q5 Most Important problem , Texas Q6 Retrospective Assessments , Obama Q7 Retrospective Assessments , Congress Q8 Rick Perry , Governor Q9 Country direction Q10 National Economy Q11 Texas direction Q12 Personal Econ Q13 Vote 2012 Q14 Republican Primary Q14A Republican Primary Force Q15 Republican Primary Satisfaction Q16_new Republican Primary Candidate Traits Q17 Republican
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report for the Texas Judiciary
    ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE TEXAS JUDICIARY FISCAL YEAR 2011 ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE TEXAS JUDICIARY FISCAL YEAR 2011 Published By OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION CARL REYNOLDS, ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR 205 WEST 14TH STREET, SUITE 600 POST OFFICE BOX 12066 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2066 (512) 463-1625 FAX: (512) 463-1648 WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV MARCH 2012 Table of Contents TEXAS COURTS: A DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY Court Structure and Function Court Structure Chart .....................................................................................................................................2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................3 Funding of the Texas Judicial Branch ...........................................................................................................3 Court Structure and Function ........................................................................................................................5 Judicial Administration ..................................................................................................................................9 Court Reorganization Bill ...............................................................................................................................10 Notes ..................................................................................................................................................................10 Information About Texas Judges Judicial Qualifications
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report for the Texas Judiciary
    ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE TEXAS JUDICIARY FISCAL YEAR 2011 ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE TEXAS JUDICIARY FISCAL YEAR 2011 Published By OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION CARL REYNOLDS, ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR 205 WEST 14TH STREET, SUITE 600 POST OFFICE BOX 12066 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2066 (512) 463-1625 FAX: (512) 463-1648 WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV MARCH 2012 Table of Contents TEXAS COURTS: A DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY Court Structure and Function Court Structure Chart .....................................................................................................................................2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................3 Funding of the Texas Judicial Branch ...........................................................................................................3 Court Structure and Function ........................................................................................................................5 Judicial Administration ..................................................................................................................................9 Court Reorganization Bill ...............................................................................................................................10 Notes ..................................................................................................................................................................10 Information About Texas Judges Judicial Qualifications
    [Show full text]
  • UT-Austin/Texas Tribune – Texas Statewide Survey, February 2012 Page 1 of 15
    University of Texas / Texas Tribune Texas Statewide Survey - Day 2 Summary Field Dates: February 8-15, 2012 N=800 Adults Margin of error: +/- 3.46% unless otherwise noted Interest and Engagement Q1. Are you registered to vote in the state of Texas? 1. Yes, registered 100% Q2. Generally speaking, would you say that you are extremely interested in politics and public affairs, somewhat interested, not very interested, or not at all interested? 1. Extremely interested 53% 2. Somewhat interested 36% 3. Not very interested 8% 4. Not at all interested 2% 5. Don’t know 1% Q3. There are many elections in the state of Texas. Furthermore, many people intend to vote in a given election, but sometimes personal and professional circumstances keep them from the polls. Thinking back over the past two or three years, would you say that you voted in all elections, almost all, about half, one or two, or none at all? 1. Every election 31% 2. Almost every election 37% 3. About half 12% 4. One or two 10% 5. None 7% 6. Don’t know/Refused/NA 2% UT-Austin/Texas Tribune – Texas Statewide Survey, February 2012 Page 1 of 15 Retrospective Assessments Q6. How would you rate the job Barack Obama has done as president? Would you say that you… 1. Approve strongly 19% 2. Approve somewhat 20% 3. Neither approve nor disapprove 5% 4. Disapprove somewhat 6% 5. Disapprove strongly 49% 6. Don’t know 1% Q7. Overall, how do you rate the job the U.S. Congress is doing? 1. Approve strongly 1% 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Salsa2sjournal 683..728
    SENATE JOURNAL EIGHTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE Ð REGULAR SESSION AUSTIN, TEXAS PROCEEDINGS THIRTIETH DAY (Wednesday, March 23, 2011) The Senate met at 11:09 a.m. pursuant to adjournment and was called to order by the President. The roll was called and the following Senators were present:iiBirdwell, Carona, Davis, Deuell, Duncan, Ellis, Eltife, Estes, Fraser, Gallegos, Harris, Hegar, Hinojosa, Huffman, Jackson, Lucio, Nelson, Nichols, Ogden, Patrick, Rodriguez, Seliger, Shapiro, Uresti, VanideiPutte, Watson, Wentworth, West, Whitmire, Williams, Zaffirini. The President announced that a quorum of the Senate was present. Father Jayme Mathias, Cristo Rey Catholic Church, Austin, offered the invocation as follows: All powerful God, we thank You for the many gifts You continue to shower upon us:iiYour gifts of life and health, family and friends, and the great responsibility of shepherding the people of this great state. We ask You to bless us today as we begin this legislative session. Enlighten us, that we might act wisely to ensure the brightest possible future for the people of our state. We ask this in Your name, You who live and reign forever and ever. Amen. Senator Whitmire moved that the reading of the Journal of the proceedings of the previous day be dispensed with and the Journal be approved as printed. The motion prevailed without objection. PHYSICIAN OF THE DAY Senator Nichols was recognized and presented Dr. Keith Miller of Center as the Physician of the Day. The Senate welcomed Dr. Miller and thanked him for his participation in the Physician of the Day program sponsored by the Texas Academy of Family Physicians.
    [Show full text]
  • UT-Austin/Texas Tribune – Texas Statewide Survey, February 2012 Page 1 of 21
    University of Texas / Texas Tribune Texas Statewide Survey Field Dates: February 8-15, 2012 N=800 Adults Margin of error: +/- 3.46% unless otherwise noted Interest and Engagement Q1. Are you registered to vote in the state of Texas? 1. Yes, registered 100% Q2. Generally speaking, would you say that you are extremely interested in politics and public affairs, somewhat interested, not very interested, or not at all interested? 1. Extremely interested 53% 2. Somewhat interested 36% 3. Not very interested 8% 4. Not at all interested 2% 5. Don’t know 1% Q3. There are many elections in the state of Texas. Furthermore, many people intend to vote in a given election, but sometimes personal and professional circumstances keep them from the polls. Thinking back over the past two or three years, would you say that you voted in all elections, almost all, about half, one or two, or none at all? 1. Every election 31% 2. Almost every election 37% 3. About half 12% 4. One or two 10% 5. None 7% 6. Don’t know/Refused/NA 2% UT-Austin/Texas Tribune – Texas Statewide Survey, February 2012 Page 1 of 21 Most Important Problem Q4. What would you say is the most important problem facing this country today? [Randomize] 1. The economy 30% 2. Unemployment/jobs 10% 3. Federal spending/national debt 17% 4. Political corruption/leadership 11% 5. Health care 4% 6. Moral decline 5% 7. National security/terrorism 1% 8. Immigration 3% 9. Taxes 1% 10. Gas prices 3% 11. Energy 0% 12. Gay marriage 0% 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 182/Thursday, September 19, 2002
    Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 182 / Thursday, September 19, 2002 / Notices 59061 Dated: September 13, 2002. is necessary for the proper performance the fiscal year. It is distributed to our Michael W. Carlton, of the functions of the agency, including partners in state, Federal, and other Chief Information Officer (I). whether the information shall have agencies; to researchers; schools of [FR Doc. 02–23791 Filed 9–18–02; 8:45 am] practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the public health; and other interested BILLING CODE 6820–EP–M agency’s estimate of the burden of the groups. It is also available on ATSDR’s proposed collection of information; (c) Internet website and by request. ways to enhance the quality, utility, and ATSDR staff has developed a reader DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND clarity of the information to be survey to get readers’ opinions and HUMAN SERVICES collected; and (d) ways to minimize the suggestions about the agency annual burden of the collection of information report. The survey will be inserted and Centers for Disease Control and on respondents, including through the mailed with each annual report. An Prevention use of automated collection techniques online version of the reader survey will or other forms of information be available on the ATSDR website. The [60Day–02–79] technology. Send comments to Seleda survey will collect information on the Proposed Data Collections Submitted Perryman, CDC Assistant Reports readability and effectiveness of the for Public Comment and Clearance Officer, 1600 Clifton Road, report, the affiliation of the readers, and Recommendations MS D–24, Atlanta, GA 30333.
    [Show full text]