Reovirus-­Induced Cell-­Mediated Immunity for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma Within the Resistant Bone Marrow Niche

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reovirus-­Induced Cell-­Mediated Immunity for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma Within the Resistant Bone Marrow Niche Open access Original research J Immunother Cancer: first published as 10.1136/jitc-2020-001803 on 19 March 2021. Downloaded from Reovirus- induced cell- mediated immunity for the treatment of multiple myeloma within the resistant bone marrow niche Louise M E Müller,1 Gemma Migneco,1 Gina B Scott,1 Jenny Down,2 Sancha King,2 1 3 4 1 Basem Askar, Victoria Jennings, Babatunde Oyajobi, Karen Scott , Emma West,1 Christy Ralph,1 Adel Samson,1 Elizabeth J Ilett,1 Munitta Muthana,2 Matt Coffey,5 Alan Melcher,3 Christopher Parrish,6 Gordon Cook,7 2 1 Michelle Lawson, Fiona Errington- Mais To cite: Müller LME, Migneco G, ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Scott GB, et al. Reovirus- Background Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an Multiple myeloma (MM) is a tumor of induced cell- mediated immunity incurable disease and oncolytic viruses offer a well- terminally differentiated plasma cells which for the treatment of multiple tolerated addition to the therapeutic arsenal. Oncolytic myeloma within the resistant expand in the bone marrow (BM). MM reovirus has progressed to phase I clinical trials and bone marrow niche. Journal results in the onset of myeloma- induced bone its direct lytic potential has been extensively studied. for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer disease (MBD) due to increased bone resorp- However, to date, the role for reovirus- induced 2021;9:e001803. doi:10.1136/ tion by osteoclasts and loss of osteoblast func- jitc-2020-001803 immunotherapy against MM, and the impact of the bone marrow (BM) niche, have not been reported. tion. MBD is one of the many debilitating Methods This study used human peripheral blood features of MM which results in bone pain ► Additional material is 1 published online only. To view, mononuclear cells from healthy donors and in vitro co- and frequent fractures. The worldwide inci- please visit the journal online culture of MM cells and BM stromal cells to recapitulate dence of MM is ~114 000 cases per year and (http:// dx. doi. org/ 10. 1136/ jitc- the resistant BM niche. Additionally, the 5TGM1- Kalw/ numbers are expected to increase with an 2020- 001803). RijHSD immunocompetent in vivo model was used to aging population.2 Currently, MM remains an examine reovirus efficacy and characterize reovirus- incurable disease in need of novel treatment Accepted 17 February 2021 induced immune responses in the BM and spleen following strategies that are safe and well- tolerated.2 intravenous administration. Collectively, these in vitro and The BM microenvironment has a diverse http://jitc.bmj.com/ in vivo models were used to characterize the development cellular composition, including haemato- of innate and adaptive antimyeloma immunity following reovirus treatment. poietic stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells, Results Using the 5TGM1- Kalw/RijHSD BM stromal cells (BMSCs; fibroblasts and immunocompetent in vivo model we have demonstrated epithelial cells) and immune cells. Moreover, that reovirus reduces both MM tumor burden and the BM niche provides a range of cytokines, on September 25, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. myeloma- induced bone disease. Furthermore, detailed chemokines and growth factors which all immune characterization revealed that reovirus: (i) contribute to MM progression and therapy + increased natural killer (NK) cell and CD8 T cell resistance.3 4 Oncolytic viruses (OVs) prefer- + numbers; (ii) activated NK cells and CD8 T cells and (iii) entially infect and kill malignant cells, and upregulated effector- memory CD8+ T cells. Moreover, + use multiple mechanisms to eradicate tumor increased effector- memory CD8 T cells correlated with cells, including engagement of both innate decreased tumor burden. Next, we explored the potential and adaptive antitumor immune responses.5 6 for reovirus-induced immunotherapy using human co- culture models to mimic the myeloma- supportive Oncolytic virotherapy has gained increasing BM niche. MM cells co- cultured with BM stromal cells attention over recent years following the displayed resistance to reovirus-induced oncolysis and Food and Drug Administration approval of © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re- use bystander cytokine- killing but remained susceptible to Talimogene laherparepvec (T-V ec), a modi- permitted under CC BY. killing by reovirus-activa ted NK cells and MM-specific fied herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1), which Published by BMJ. cytotoxic T lymphocytes. encodes granulocyte-macrophage colony- For numbered affiliations see Conclusion These data highlight the importance of stimulating factor (GM-CSF), for the treat- end of article. reovirus-induced immunotherapy for targeting MM cells ment of advanced melanoma. Unfortunately, within the BM niche and suggest that combination with in comparison to solid malignancies, OVs are Correspondence to agents which boost antitumor immune responses should relatively under investigated in the context Dr Fiona Errington- Mais; be a priority. F. Errington@ leeds. ac. uk of hematological malignancies (HM) and, as Müller LME, et al. J Immunother Cancer 2021;9:e001803. doi:10.1136/jitc-2020-001803 1 Open access J Immunother Cancer: first published as 10.1136/jitc-2020-001803 on 19 March 2021. Downloaded from such, their progression to clinical trials has been limited; Reovirus therapy experiment to date, phase I clinical trials in MM have been reported Both female and male mice aged 5–8 weeks were used for reovirus, measles virus (MV) and vesicular stomatitis and all groups were randomized based on age and sex. virus.7 Mouse group numbers were ascertained using the power Reovirus is a double-stranded RNA virus that uses calculation formula (2(SD)2×f(α,β)/Δ2). The α (signifi- junctional adhesion molecule A (JAM- A) for viral entry,8 cance level) was 0.05, β (power level) was 90% and both kills neoplastic cells through both apoptotic and non- Δ (least practicable difference between groups) and SD apoptotic mechanisms9 10 and can use activated RAS were taken from a pilot study to determine reovirus effi- signaling for replication and oncolysis9; significantly, cacy. This gave rise to the following power calculation JAM- A is overexpressed in MM11 and mutated Ras is (2(8.33)2×10.5/152=6.47) and seven mice/group were associated with MM progression.12 In accordance with used for all subsequent in vivo experiments. this, the direct lytic potential of reovirus against MM On day 0, mice were injected with 2×106 bone- homing has been reported13 and early phase clinical trials have 5TGM1 cells (a kind gift from Prof Oyajobi)19 in 100 µL been carried out using reovirus type 3 Dearing strain phosphate- buffered saline (PBS) via the lateral tail vein. (T3D; pelareorep).14 Pelareorep was well-tolerated in On day 7–9, reovirus or control (PBS) treatment was patients with MM, and only low- grade adverse effects initiated with 3 weekly injections (Monday/Wednesday/ were reported.14 15 Friday) of 2×107 plaque- forming units (PFU)/mL Innate and adaptive immunity are important for reovirus in 100 µL PBS or 100 µL PBS alone, respectively. reovirus efficacy and the secretion of type I inter- Treatment continued until the development of HLP in feron (IFN) is a key component of the innate immune PBS- treated mice (20–27 days) when all mice were sacri- response.16 IFN-α is important for natural killer (NK) cell ficed and tissues were harvested for assessment of tumor activation in response to reovirus,16 although a range of burden, bone analysis and immunophenotyping (see other pro- inflammatory cytokines mediate the recruit- online supplemental tables S1 and S2 for details of the ment of NK cells and dendritic cells (DC) to the tumor.17 flow cytometry antibodies used). Reovirus also enhances the ability of DC to present tumor- associated antigens (TAA) for priming of tumor-specific Assessment of MBD by micro-CT cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs).18 Harnessing reovirus- To assess bone disease, tibiae were analyzed by micro-CT induced antitumor immunity has the potential to induce (µCT) using a SkyScan 1272 ex vivo µCT scanner at 50 kV immunological memory and long-term cancer remission and 200 µA, using an aluminum filter of 0.5 mm and pixel in patients with MM. size of 4.3 µm2, as described previously.20 Bone volume Unfortunately, despite promising preclinical data, (BV)/total volume, trabecular number, trabecular thick- single- agent reovirus treatment was ineffective at treating ness, cortical thickness, lesion area and lesion number relapsed/refractory MM. This dichotomy highlights the parameters were then assessed as described previously20 21 need for us to better understand reovirus–host interac- and according to standard guidelines. http://jitc.bmj.com/ tions, in particular, which reovirus effector mechanisms are induced within the BM niche and which have the SYBR Green reovirus RT-qPCR capacity to eradicate MM cells that are supported by the One- step quantitative PCR (qPCR) reactions were tumor microenvironment. Once identified, key effector prepared in triplicate in 96-well MicroAmp Optical Reac- mechanisms can be prioritized for the development tion plates (Applied Biosystems) using the Power SYBR Green RNA- to- C 1- Step Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific); of effective combination strategies designed to boost T on September 25, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. reovirus efficacy in clinical trials. Therefore, this study 20 µL reaction mixes included: 0.3 µg RNA, 1× Power aimed to characterize the immune response to reovirus in SYBR Green RT- PCR Mix, 1× RT Enzyme Mix, 0.5 µM of a BM niche and identify key effector mechanisms under- σ3 forward and reverse primers and RNase- free water. A pinning reovirus efficacy. 10fold serial dilution of reovirus RNA, isolated from stock reovirus, was included for quantification of reovirus RNA. Thermal cycling was performed on the QuantStudio 5 Real- Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). METHODS 5TGM1 in vivo model Cell culture C57BL/KaLw/RijHSD mice were purchased at age 5–10 NCI-H929, U266B, JIM3 and OPM2 human MM cell lines, weeks from the St James’s Biomedical Services, Univer- KG-1 (an acute myeloid leukemia cell line) and HS-5 sity of Leeds.
Recommended publications
  • Oncolytic Viruses PANVAC and Pelareorep As Treatment for Metastatic Breast Cancer
    Oncolytic Viruses PANVAC and Pelareorep as Treatment for Metastatic Breast Cancer Willie Mieke Iwema Rijksuniversiteit Groningen S2673622 BSc Thesis Life science & Technology July 5, 2019 Department of Medical Microbiology: Molecular Virology D. Bhatt PhD candidate Prof. dr. C.A.H.H. Daemen Table of content 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 4 2. PANVAC ....................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Vaccinia virus mechanism of action .............................................................................................. 7 2.2 Activation of the host immune system .......................................................................................... 8 2.3 PANVAC in advanced carcinomas ................................................................................................. 9 2.4 PANVAC and docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer ................................................................... 11 3. Pelareorep ................................................................................................................................. 13 3.1 Reovirus mechanism of action .................................................................................................... 13 3.2 Activation of the host immune system ........................................................................................ 14 3.3 Pelareorep
    [Show full text]
  • Pembrolizumab in Combination with the Oncolytic Virus Pelareorep And
    Published OnlineFirst November 6, 2019; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2078 CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH | CLINICAL TRIALS: IMMUNOTHERAPY Pembrolizumab in Combination with the Oncolytic Virus Pelareorep and Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Phase Ib Study A C Devalingam Mahalingam1,2, Grey A. Wilkinson3, Kevin H. Eng4, Paul Fields5, Patrick Raber5, Jennifer L. Moseley2, Karol Cheetham3, Matt Coffey3, Gerard Nuovo6, Pawel Kalinski4, Bin Zhang1, Sukeshi Patel Arora2, and Christos Fountzilas4 ABSTRACT ◥ Background: Pelareorep is an intravenously delivered oncolytic achieved partial response for 17.4 months. Two additional patients reovirus that can induce a T-cell–inflamed phenotype in pancreatic achieved stable disease, lasting 9 and 4 months, respectively. ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Tumor tissues from patients Treatment was well tolerated, with mostly grade 1 or 2 treat- treated with pelareorep have shown reovirus replication, T-cell ment-related adverse events, including flu-like symptoms. Viral infiltration, and upregulation of PD-L1. We hypothesized that replication was observed in on-treatment tumor biopsies. T-cell pelareorep in combination with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy receptor sequencing from peripheral blood revealed the creation of in patients with PDAC would be safe and effective. new T-cell clones during treatment. High peripheral clonality and Methods: A phase Ib single-arm study enrolled patients with changes in the expression of immune genes were observed in PDAC who progressed after first-line treatment. Patients received patients with clinical benefit. pelareorep, pembrolizumab, and either 5-fluorouracil, gemcitabine, Conclusions: Pelareorep and pembrolizumab added to che- or irinotecan until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. motherapy did not add significant toxicity and showed encour- Study objectives included safety and dose-limiting toxicities, tumor aging efficacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Immunotherapy in Myeloma Horizons Infosheet Clinical Trials and Novel Drugs
    Immunotherapy in myeloma Horizons Infosheet Clinical trials and novel drugs This Horizons Infosheet provides information on immunotherapy, a type of treatment being investigated in myeloma. The Horizons Infosheet series What is immunotherapy? provides information relating Immunotherapy is a type of cancer to novel drugs and treatment treatment which helps the immune strategies that are currently being system to recognise and kill cancer investigated for the treatment of cells. Many myeloma treatments are myeloma. The series also aims to immunotherapies. highlight the considerable amount of research currently taking place in What is the immune system? the field of myeloma. The immune system is made up of The drugs and novel strategies specialised cells, tissues and organs described in the Horizons Infosheets which work together in a process may not be licensed and/or known as an immune response. An approved for use in myeloma. You immune response protects the body may, however, be able to access from foreign organisms (such as them as part of a clinical trial. bacteria or viruses) that enter the body. Infoline: 0800 980 3332 1 The immune system also identifies of mechanisms, allowing them and kills faulty or abnormal cells in to multiply and grow in the body. the body. Immunotherapy stimulates the immune system to work harder or White blood cells, produced in the smarter to kill myeloma cells. bone marrow, are an important part of the immune system. Different The complexity of the immune types of white blood cell, such as system means that there are plasma cells and T cells, perform many ways in which it can be specific immune functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Trends in Cancer Immunotherapy
    biomedicines Review Current Trends in Cancer Immunotherapy Ivan Y. Filin 1 , Valeriya V. Solovyeva 1 , Kristina V. Kitaeva 1, Catrin S. Rutland 2 and Albert A. Rizvanov 1,3,* 1 Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, 420008 Kazan, Russia; [email protected] (I.Y.F.); [email protected] (V.V.S.); [email protected] (K.V.K.) 2 Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2QL, UK; [email protected] 3 Republic Clinical Hospital, 420064 Kazan, Russia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-905-316-7599 Received: 9 November 2020; Accepted: 16 December 2020; Published: 17 December 2020 Abstract: The search for an effective drug to treat oncological diseases, which have become the main scourge of mankind, has generated a lot of methods for studying this affliction. It has also become a serious challenge for scientists and clinicians who have needed to invent new ways of overcoming the problems encountered during treatments, and have also made important discoveries pertaining to fundamental issues relating to the emergence and development of malignant neoplasms. Understanding the basics of the human immune system interactions with tumor cells has enabled new cancer immunotherapy strategies. The initial successes observed in immunotherapy led to new methods of treating cancer and attracted the attention of the scientific and clinical communities due to the prospects of these methods. Nevertheless, there are still many problems that prevent immunotherapy from calling itself an effective drug in the fight against malignant neoplasms. This review examines the current state of affairs for each immunotherapy method, the effectiveness of the strategies under study, as well as possible ways to overcome the problems that have arisen and increase their therapeutic potentials.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinically Explored Virus-Based Therapies for the Treatment of Recurrent High-Grade Glioma in Adults
    biomedicines Review Clinically Explored Virus-Based Therapies for the Treatment of Recurrent High-Grade Glioma in Adults Amanda V. Immidisetti 1,* , Chibueze D. Nwagwu 2, David C. Adamson 3,4, Nitesh V. Patel 5 and Anne-Marie Carbonell 6 1 Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA 2 School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA; [email protected] 4 Atlanta VA Healthcare System, Decatur, GA 30033, USA 5 Department of Neurosurgery, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA; [email protected] 6 OncoSynergy, Inc., Stamford, CT 06902, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: As new treatment modalities are being explored in neuro-oncology, viruses are emerging as a promising class of therapeutics. Virotherapy consists of the introduction of either wild-type or engineered viruses to the site of disease, where they exert an antitumor effect. These viruses can either be non-lytic, in which case they are used to deliver gene therapy, or lytic, which induces tumor cell lysis and subsequent host immunologic response. Replication-competent viruses can then go on to further infect and lyse neighboring glioma cells. This treatment paradigm is being explored extensively in both preclinical and clinical studies for a variety of indications. Virus-based Citation: Immidisetti, A.V.; therapies are advantageous due to the natural susceptibility of glioma cells to viral infection, which Nwagwu, C.D.; Adamson, D.C.; Patel, improves therapeutic selectivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Past, Present and Future of Oncolytic Reovirus
    cancers Review Past, Present and Future of Oncolytic Reovirus , Louise Müller y , Robert Berkeley y, Tyler Barr, Elizabeth Ilett z and Fiona Errington-Mais * z Leeds Institute of Medical Research (LIMR), University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; [email protected] (L.M.); [email protected] (R.B.); [email protected] (T.B.); [email protected] (E.I.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-113-3438410 Authors contributed equally to this review article. y Joint Senior Author. z Received: 18 September 2020; Accepted: 30 October 2020; Published: 31 October 2020 Simple Summary: Within this review article the authors provide an unbiased review of the oncolytic virus, reovirus, clinically formulated as pelareorep. In particular, the authors summarise what is known about the molecular and cellular requirements for reovirus oncolysis and provide a comprehensive summary of reovirus-induced anti-tumour immune responses. Importantly, the review also outlines the progress made towards more efficacious combination therapies and their evaluation in clinical trials. The limitations and challenges that remain to harness the full potential of reovirus are also discussed. Abstract: Oncolytic virotherapy (OVT) has received significant attention in recent years, especially since the approval of talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC) in 2015 by the Food and Drug administration (FDA). Mechanistic studies of oncolytic viruses (OVs) have revealed that most, if not all, OVs induce direct oncolysis and stimulate innate and adaptive anti-tumour immunity. With the advancement of tumour modelling, allowing characterisation of the effects of tumour microenvironment (TME) components and identification of the cellular mechanisms required for cell death (both direct oncolysis and anti-tumour immune responses), it is clear that a “one size fits all” approach is not applicable to all OVs, or indeed the same OV across different tumour types and disease locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Treating Cancer by Mimicking Infection
    Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on May 23, 2019; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1800 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Pathogen molecular pattern receptor agonists: treating cancer by mimicking infection Running Title: Pattern recognition receptors in immuno-oncology Mark Aleynick;1 Judit Svensson-Arvelund, PhD;1 Christopher R. Flowers, MD;2 Aurélien Marabelle, MD, PhD;3 Joshua D. Brody, MD.1,4,* 1Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA 2Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30307, USA 3Cancer Immunotherapy Program, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif 94800, France 4Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA *Correspondence: Joshua D. Brody [email protected]; 212-241-6756 Hess CSM Floor 5 Room 106 1470 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10029 Disclosures: Mark Aleynick has no conflicts of interest to disclose. Judit Svensson-Arvelund has no conflicts of interest to disclose Christopher Flowers has served as a consultant for: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Celgene (unpaid), Denovo Biopharma, Genentech/Roche (unpaid), Gilead, OptumRx, Karyopharm, Pharmacyclics/ Janssen, Spectrum. Dr. Flowers has received research funding from: Abbvie, Acerta, BeiGene, Celgene, Gilead, Genentech/Roche, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Millennium/Takeda, Pharmacyclics, TG Therapeutics, Burroughs Wellcome Fund, Eastern Cooperative
    [Show full text]
  • A Phase 2 Study of Pembrolizumab in Combination with Pelareorep in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
    IRB #: STU00207577-MOD0018 Approved by NU IRB for use on or after 7/8/2020 through 9/29/2020. NU Study Number: NU 18I01 A Phase 2 study of pembrolizumab in combination with pelareorep in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma Principal Investigator: Devalingam Mahalingam MD, PhD Northwestern University Associate Professor, Division of Hematology and Oncology Developmental Therapeutics Institute (DTI) 233 East Superior Street, Ground Floor, Olson Pavilion Chicago, IL 60611 Phone: 312-695-6929 Fax: 312-472-0564 E-mail: [email protected] Sub-Investigator(s): Division of Hematology and Oncology Northwestern University Al Benson, MD Aparna Kalyan, MBBS, FRACP Sheetal Kircher, MD Mary Mulcahy, MD Biostatistician: Hui Zhang, PhD [email protected] Study Intervention(s): Pelareorep and Pembrolizumab IND Number: PS003760 IND Holder: Devalingam Mahalingam MD, PhD Funding Source: Oncolytics Biotech Inc: drug support (pelareorep) Merck: drug support (pembrolizumab) Version Date: 3.23.2020 Coordinating Center: Clinical Trials Office Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center Northwestern University 676 N. St. Clair, Suite 1200 Chicago, IL 60611 http://cancer.northwestern.edu/research/clinical-trials-office/ NU 18I01 Protocol Version Date:3.23.2020 i IRB #: STU00207577-MOD0018 Approved by NU IRB for use on or after 7/8/2020 through 9/29/2020. NU Study Number: NU 18I01 Table of Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS..........................................................................................................................iv STUDY
    [Show full text]
  • A Phase II Study of Pelareorep (REOLYSIN®) in Combination with Gemcitabine for Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
    cancers Article A Phase II Study of Pelareorep (REOLYSIN®) in Combination with Gemcitabine for Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Devalingam Mahalingam 1,2,*, Sanjay Goel 3, Santiago Aparo 3, Sukeshi Patel Arora 2, Nicole Noronha 4, Hue Tran 4, Romit Chakrabarty 4, Giovanni Selvaggi 4, Andres Gutierrez 4, Matthew Coffey 4, Steffan T. Nawrocki 5, Gerard Nuovo 6 and Monica M. Mita 7 1 Division of Hematology/Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA 2 Cancer Therapy and Research Center, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA; [email protected] 3 Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY 10467, USA; sgoel@montefiore.org (S.G.); [email protected] (S.A.) 4 Oncolytics Biotech Inc., Calgary, AB T2N 1X7, Canada; [email protected] (N.N.); [email protected] (H.T.); [email protected] (R.C.); [email protected] (G.S.); [email protected] (A.G.); [email protected] (M.C.) 5 Department of Medicine, Division of Translational and Regenerative Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA; [email protected] 6 Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH and Phylogeny, Inc., Powell, OH 43065, USA; [email protected] 7 Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-312-926-9636 Received: 20 April 2018; Accepted: 17 May 2018; Published: 25 May 2018 Abstract: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a poor prognosis, with 1 and 5-year survival rates of ~18% and 7% respectively. FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine in combination with nab-paclitaxel are standard treatment options for metastatic disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Reovirus Enhances Cytotoxicity of Natural Killer Cells Against Colorectal
    Long et al. J Transl Med (2021) 19:185 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-02853-y Journal of Translational Medicine RESEARCH Open Access Reovirus enhances cytotoxicity of natural killer cells against colorectal cancer via TLR3 pathway Shiqi Long1,2†, Yangzhuo Gu3†, Yuanyuan An1,2, Xiaojin Lin1,2, Xiaoqing Chen1,2, Xianyao Wang1,2, Chunxiang Liao1,2, Weiwei Ouyang4, Nianxue Wang2, Zhixu He1,5 and Xing Zhao1,2,3* Abstract Background: Cetuximab has been approved for use for frst-line treatment of patients with wild-type KRAS meta- static colorectal cancer (CRC). However, treatment with cetuximab has shown limited efcacy as a CRC monotherapy. In addition, natural killer (NK) cell function is known to be severely attenuated in cancer patients. The goal of this study was to develop a new strategy to enhance antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) mediated by NK cells, in combination with cetuximab against CRC cells. Methods: Ex vivo expanded NK cells were stimulated with reovirus, and reovirus-activated NK cells mediated ADCC assay were performed on CRC cells in combination with cetuximab. The synergistic antitumor efects of reovirus-acti- vated NK cells and cetuximab were tested on DLD-1 tumor-bearing mice. Finally, Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) knock- down in NK cells, along with chemical blockade of TLR3/dsRNA complex, and inhibition of the TLR3 downstream signaling pathway, were performed to explore the mechanisms by which reovirus enhances NK cell cytotoxicity. Results: We frst confrmed that exposure of NK cells to reovirus enhanced their cytotoxicity in a dose-dependent manner.We then investigated whether reovirus-activated NK cells exposed to cetuximab-bound CRC cells exhibited greater anti-tumor efcacy than either monotherapy.
    [Show full text]
  • Pembrolizumab in Combination with the Oncolytic Virus Pelareorep and Chemotherapy In
    Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on November 6, 2019; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2078 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. 1 Pembrolizumab in combination with the oncolytic virus pelareorep and chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a Phase 1b study Devalingam Mahalingam1,2, Grey A Wilkinson3, Kevin H. Eng4, Paul Fields5, Patrick Raber5, Jennifer L. Moseley2, Karol Cheetham3, Matt Coffey3, Gerard Nuovo7, Pawel Kalinski4, Bin Zhang1, Sukeshi Patel Arora2, Christos Fountzilas4 1Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 2Mays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; 3Oncolytics Biotech Inc, Calgary, AB; 4Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; 5Adaptive Biotechnologies, Seattle WA; 7Ohio State University Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH. Corresponding Author: Devalingam Mahalingam, Email: [email protected] Running title: A phase 1b study of pelareorep in combination with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy Keywords: Oncolytic virus, immune checkpoint inhibitor, PD-1, PD-L1 pancreatic adenocarcinoma, immunotherapy, reovirus type 3 Dearing, tumor microenvironment (TME) Financial Support: Oncolytics Biotech Inc. provided pelareorep and partial funding. The correlative studies were partially funded by a grant provided by the Roswell Park Alliance Foundation. CF was a recipient of a postdoctoral fellowship award from the Research Training Award (RP 140105) funded by the Cancer Prevention & Research Institute of Texas. This work Downloaded from clincancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 23, 2021. © 2019 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on November 6, 2019; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2078 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
    [Show full text]
  • Oncolytic Virotherapy: New Weapon for Breast Cancer Treatment
    Oncolytic virotherapy: new weapon for breast cancer treatment Veronica Martini1,2a , Francesca D’Avanzo1, Paola Maria Maggiora1, Feba Maria Varughese1,2, Antonio Sica3,4b and Alessandra Gennari1,2c 1Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara 13100, Italy 2Center for Translational Research on Autoimmune & Allergic Diseases – CAAD, Novara 28100, Italy 3Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, A Avogadro 28100, Italy 4Department of Inflammation and Immunology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center–IRCCS, Rozzano (MI) 20089, Italy ahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0887-4082 bhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8342-7442 chttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0928-2281 Abstract The recent introduction of viruses as a weapon against cancer can be regarded as one of the most intriguing approaches in the context of precision medicine. The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors has been extensively studied in early and advanced cancer stages, with extraordinary results. Although there is a good tolerability profile, especially when compared with conventional chemotherapy, severe immune-related adverse events have Review emerged as a potential limitation. Moreover, there are still treatment-resistant cases and thus further treatment options need to be implemented. Several in vitro and in vivo stud- ies have been conducted and are ongoing to develop oncolytic viruses (OVs) as a tool to modulate the immune system response. OVs are attenuated viruses that can kill cancer cells after having infected them, producing microenvironment remodelling and antitu- mour immune response. The potential of oncolytic virotherapy is to contrast the absence of T cell infiltrates, converting ‘cold’ tumours into ‘hot’ ones, thus improving the perfor- mance of the immune system.
    [Show full text]