ACTION PLAN No. 35

The Little morphnoides was declared a vulnerable on 22 February 2008 in accordance with section 38 of the Nature Conservation Act 1980. Section 40 of the Act requires the Conservator of Flora and Fauna to prepare an Action Plan in response to each declaration. This is the Action Plan for the:

Little Eagle Hieraaetus morphnoides

Preamble Table 1 Criteria satisfied

The Nature Conservation Act 1980 establishes 2.2 Species is observed, estimated, inferred the ACT Flora and Fauna Committee with or suspected to be at risk of premature responsibilities for assessing the conservation in the ACT region in the status of ACT flora and fauna and the medium-term future, as demonstrated by ecological significance of potentially the following: threatening processes. Where the Committee 2.2.1 Current serious decline in believes that a species or ecological population or distribution from community is threatened with extinction or a evidence based on: process is an ecological threat, it is required to advise the responsible Minister and 2.2.1.1 Direct observation, recommend that a declaration be made including comparison of accordingly. historical and current records.

Flora and Fauna Committee assessments are made on nature conservation grounds only and in a regional context. They are guided by criteria set out in its publication Threatened Species and Communities in the ACT: criteria for assessment, September 2001. Australian Capital Territory Vulnerable. Declared under Section 38 of the In making its assessment of the Little Eagle, Nature Conservation Act 1980. Notified in the Committee concluded that the criteria for a Disallowable Instrument No. DI2008-26, 25 vulnerable species were satisfied as indicated February 2008. in the adjacent table. In response to a Committee recommendation, the Minister made a corresponding declaration. Vulnerable. Listed in Part 1 of Schedule 2 of the NSW Threatened Species Conservation The Conservator of Flora and Fauna is Act 1995. Gazetted 12 February 2010. required to develop a management response to each declaration by way of an Action Plan. The plan must contain proposals for the identification, protection and survival of a Links with other plans declared species. Measures proposed in this Action Plan This is the Action Plan for the Little Eagle complement those proposed in: Hieraaetus morphnoides. Whilst its legal • Action Plan No. 27: Woodlands for Wildlife: authority is confined to the Australian Capital ACT Lowland Woodland Conservation Territory, management considerations are Strategy addressed in a regional context. • Action Plan No. 28: A Vision Splendid of the Grassy Plains Extended: ACT Lowland Native Conservation Strategy

Action Plan No. 35. Little Eagle 1 • Action Plan No. 29: Ribbons of Life: ACT similar to adults but tend to be more strongly Aquatic Species and rufous in colour with less contrast in patterns Conservation Strategy. (Marchant and Higgins 1993; Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001; Olsen and Fuentes 2004; Debus 1998). Species description and ecology

DESCRIPTION Typical habitat for the Little Eagle includes

woodland or open . Higher abundance of The Little Eagle Hieraaetus morphnoides is the species is associated with hillsides where one of the smallest in the world. It is a there is a mosaic of wooded and open areas stocky, powerful with a broad head, fully such as riparian woodlands, forest margins feathered legs and a square-cut, barred tail and wooded farmland. Little Eagles usually (Figure 1). Adults weigh between 500 and avoid large areas of dense forest, preferring to 1200 g with a body length of 450–550 mm. hunt in open woodland, where the use Wingspan is about 120 cm with males having trees for lookouts (Marchant and Higgins 1993; longer wings in proportion to their bodies, but Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). In the ACT, being nearly half the weight of females. Little Eagles frequent open woodland and riparian areas (Olsen and Fuentes 2004).

BREEDING

Little Eagles in open woodland (usually on hillsides) and along tree-lined watercourses, with the nest typically placed in a mature, living tree. The birds build a stick nest lined with leaves and may use different in successive years, including those of other birds such as ravens. Two eggs are usually laid in late August to early September (Marchant and Higgins 1993). After an incubation period of about 37 days, one or two young are fledged after approximately eight weeks (Olsen and Fuentes 2004; Debus et al. 2007; Debus and Ley 2009).

Little Eagle nesting territories are defended against intruders and advertised by soaring, undulating flight display, conspicuous perching and/or calling (Marchant and Higgins 1993; Debus et al. 2007; Bounds 2008). Movement behaviour varies between individuals, and may be partly migratory, dispersive or permanently resident (Marchant and Higgins 1993).

DIET

Little Eagles hunt live prey and occasionally take carrion. The eagles search for prey by soaring (up to 500 m altitude) or by using an

elevated exposed perch. The species is an Figure 1 Little Eagle agile, fast hunter swooping to take prey on the

ground in the open but also from trees and The Little Eagle occurs in light and dark colour shrubs (Marchant and Higgins 1993; Olsen et forms. The most common is the light form al. 2006; Debus et al. 2007; Debus and Ley which is dark brown above with black streaks 2009). Recorded prey species (from feeding on the head and neck, and a sandy to pale observations, nest remains and faecal pellets) underbody. The dark form is similar except the show considerable variation indicating a broad head and underbody is usually darker brown or diet, which seems to be determined primarily rich rufous. The sexes are similar with females by the availability of prey of a suitable size. being larger and typically darker. Juveniles are

Action Plan No. 35. Little Eagle 2 Rabbits (mostly juveniles), birds (parrots and 1990s (Bounds 2008). The decline in reporting small passerines < 500 g), insects (such as rate over the past 20 years for the South Christmas beetles Anoplognathus sp. and Eastern Highlands bioregion (DSEWPC 2011) Cicadas) and are typical dietary has been greater than 20% (Barrett et al. 2003, inclusions (Baker-Gabb 1984; Marchant and 2007). This bioregion includes the ACT. Higgins 1993; Debus 1998; Debus and Rose 1999; Olsen and Osgood 2006; Debus et al. Sightings of the Little Eagle have been 2007; Debus and Ley 2009; Olsen et al. 2006, recorded across much of the ACT, but the 2010). Debus (1998) notes that their diet varies breeding range is in the lower northern parts of geographically; the diet in northern the ACT with the highest concentrations in the has a high proportion of birds, in the arid zone Murrumbidgee and the Molonglo river corridors is mostly , and in has (Taylor and COG 1992). The Little Eagle has a high proportion of juvenile rabbits. In the ACT undergone greater than 70% decline over the region its diet comprises mostly rabbits and to last 20 years. For the period 1990-1992 the a lesser extent birds (especially rosellas, number of ACT breeding territories reported magpie-larks and starlings) (Olsen and was 13 (Taylor and COG 1992) or 11 (Olsen Fuentes 2004; Olsen et al. 2006, 2010). 1992) whereas in the same number of years two decades later there were three or two, i.e 3 There is some evidence of prey partitioning in 2009 (Olsen et al. 2010), 2 in 2010 on the between Little Eagles and the sympatric, larger same sites (Olsen et al. 2012) 1 in 2011 and 1 Wedge-tailed Eagle Aquila audax, with the in 2012. latter tending to take larger prey and to eat more carrion (Baker-Gabb 1984; Debus and Breeding success is likely to be a key indicator Rose 1999; Olsen et al. 2006, 2010). However, of the Little Eagle’s status and the lower rabbits are the most common dietary item for Molonglo River valley appears to have been a both eagle species near (Olsen et al. stronghold for the species in the ACT in recent 2010), indicating potential for competition for times. Much of the area is to be developed for prey. Both species also eat carrion and it is housing the increasing Canberra population. possible that the more numerous Wedge-tailed Eagles in the ACT region keep Little Eagles away from macropod carcasses, and that Little Threats Eagles would eat more carrion if not excluded by Wedge-tailed Eagles (Olsen et al. 2010). The main threat to the Little Eagle appears to

be loss of habitat. In the ACT this is mostly due DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE to the encroachment of urban development on

remnant woodland and grassland. Associated The Little Eagle is endemic to Australia and is human activity may also cause the retreat of distributed throughout the mainland. In south- Little Eagles from nearby, otherwise suitable eastern Australia there has been a general and habitat (Debus 2005; Olsen and Fuentes 2005; continuing decline in its abundance over the Olsen and Osgood 2006; Debus et al. 2007; last 30 years based on indices established by Olsen et al. 2008). national and regional censuses.

Approximately 80% of the estimated area of In the first national bird atlas in 1977–81, the lowland woodland in the ACT at the time of Little Eagle was reported in 65% of one degree European settlement has been lost (ACT grid cells across Australia, with mostly high Government 2010). In 2004 the urban reporting rates (more than 40% of surveys per development of East O'Malley woodland grid) across NSW and Victoria. Breeding was displaced the last active Little Eagle nest in the recorded in 11% of cells, with the highest rates urban area (Olsen and Fuentes 2005). The in NSW and Victoria (Blakers et al. 1984). Little Eagle has been noted as one of the During the second national bird atlas in 1998– species that would be affected by urban 2002, the Little Eagle was recorded in 59% of development in the Lower Molonglo Valley grid cells, at mostly low reporting rates (Debus 2008). (recorded in less than 20% of surveys per grid). Breeding was recorded in 5% of grid Protecting nest trees e.g. placing a buffer cells (Barrett et al. 2003, 2007). Overall, there around them, is not necessarily sufficient for has been a national decline in reporting rate of conservation. Foraging areas also need to be 14%. In NSW over the last 20 years (two Little protected. Nesting and foraging areas may be Eagle generations) the decline in reporting rate disjunct, with foraging areas several kilometres has been 39%, and over the past 30 years has away from the nest tree, which is typically been 50%, with an accelerating trend since the located in woodland (Olsen and Osgood 2006;

Action Plan No. 35. Little Eagle 3 Debus and Ley 2009). Radio tracking or GPS Little Eagles as a component of the indigenous studies would be useful to quantify home range biodiversity of the ACT and region. size and habitat use. This objective is to be achieved through the There has been speculation that loss of following strategies: woodland nesting habitat and increased kangaroo abundance in and around the city Survey, Monitoring and Research may have resulted in an increased level of Promoting and participating in a program of interaction between Little Eagles and the survey, monitoring and research, aimed at larger, dominant Wedge-tailed Eagle. Wedge- better understanding of the ecology of the tailed Eagles breed earlier than Little Eagles species and identifying and managing causes and appear to compete for food, nests and of population decline. nest-sites, and have been known to kill Little Eagles (Debus 2005; Olsen et al. 2006, 2010). Such interactions may have resulted in Little Protection Eagles being displaced from territories and/or Identifying and protecting habitat critical to a decrease in their breeding success (Olsen et survival of the species in the ACT. al. 2006; Debus et al. 2007). In the ACT, the remaining Little Eagle nests are five kilometres Regional Co-operation or more away from Wedge-tailed Eagle nests (Olsen and Fuentes 2005; Olsen et al. 2008, Co-operating with state and local government 2009). Breeding pairs of Little Eagles have agencies in formulating and implementing been observed to move into areas vacated by conservation measures. Wedge-tailed Eagles due to human interference (Olsen et al. 2006). Community Engagement Increasing community awareness of the need Direct or secondary poisoning by pesticides to protect the species and its habitat, and such as Pindone used for rabbit control has supporting related community-based been suggested as a possible cause for the conservation action. death of a number of raptors in the ACT, including Little Eagles (Olsen et al, 2010). The paucity of information on home ranges and habitat use for Little Eagles makes it difficult to Conservation issues and intended specify an appropriate safe distance from a management actions nesting site for the application of pesticides (Olsen and Osgood 2006). The primary conservation issue for the Little Eagle in the ACT is retention of adequate These issues are not confined to the ACT. In foraging and breeding habitat. Core habitat in NSW over 50% of forest and woodland has the ACT comprises grassland, lowland been cleared (Lunney 2004). Much of the woodland and riparian areas where eagles can remaining habitat that is important for eagle hunt and establish breeding territories. breeding is under ecological stress (Morgan 2000; Barrett et al. 2007). In NSW ‘Clearing of Much of the former lowland area of the ACT is native vegetation’ is recognised as a Key now occupied by Canberra, and the remaining Threatening Process under the Threatened areas of these habitat types will be reduced by Species Conservation Act 1995. Likewise, further urban expansion to accommodate the Pindone for rabbit control is readily available in increasing human population, eg development all jurisdictions and potential risk to raptors is of the Lower Molonglo valley. Approximately not widely appreciated. forty nature reserves have been identified in and around the urban area but none is large There is likely to be ready movement of Little enough and of suitable habitat to be likely to Eagles between NSW and the ACT, meaning meet the needs of even one breeding pair of that population change has to be considered Little Eagles. on a regional basis, and management of threats would ideally be the same. For example a large area around one of the recently used nest sites at Belconnen is planned for urban development. While Kama Major conservation objective Nature Reserve nearby has been preserved from development, and is important for The objective of this Action Plan is to maintain conservation of many of the elements of in the long term, a viable, wild population of endangered lowland grassland and woodland,

Action Plan No. 35. Little Eagle 4 its size at 0.15 sq km, is two orders of A better understanding of the ecology of the magnitude too small to permanently provide for Little Eagle is developed and used to identify a pair of Little Eagles. This example is likely to and manage causes of population decline. illustrate the general pattern of the relationship between the Little Eagle and the city of Actions Canberra. 1. Participate in and support survey, monitoring and research by tertiary It is difficult to evaluate the level of threat institutions; support involvement by posed by Pindone used to poison rabbits. community based organisations to: Based on toxicity studies with Wedge-tailed • Eagles, it seems likely that some rabbit monitor the breeding success of the carcasses contain sufficient toxin to kill a Little Little Eagle; and Eagle. However Little Eagles take mainly • improve understanding of habitat use juvenile rabbits (as live prey) and for and home range of remaining breeding effectiveness, rabbit control is preferably timed birds in ACT to avoid the season when juveniles are Seek funding to: present. ACT government rabbit poisoning • improve understanding of the territory programs include several measures to reduce overlap between Little Eagles and the risk to raptors, including observation during Wedge-tailed Eagles the ‘free feeding’ stage (using non-toxic bait), and collecting any visible carcasses early in • investigate the hypothesis that the morning. (Most rabbits die in cover or Pindone and other chemicals have underground.) However Pindone is freely caused the decline of Little Eagles, available, and is used by other landholders and alternative hypotheses. also, both in the ACT and through the range of 2. In developing pest control programs, use the Little Eagle. Other toxins, and other information from surveys, monitoring and hypothetical causes of population decline research, including on home ranges and should also be considered. habitat use for Little Eagles to assess the likely susceptibility of Little Eagles to Existing information includes reliable, time- indirect poisoning from those programs. based records of distribution, nesting sites and Modify programs accordingly. breeding success for the species. Such information will assist in identifying ecological Indicators threats, determining research needs, and 1. There is improved understanding of the developing protection and management ecology of the Little Eagle (in particular, strategies. distribution, breeding success, habitat use, home range, territory overlap with the SURVEY, MONITORING AND RESEARCH Wedge-tailed Eagle) and this information is used to inform conservation actions to Critical to effective conservation actions for the protect the species. Little Eagle is a greater understanding of its habitat use, home range requirements, and 2. Information on the ecology of the Little whether interactions between Little Eagles and Eagle is taken into consideration in Wedge-tailed Eagles have increased to a level preparing pest control programs, so as to that is detrimental to Little Eagle breeding lessen the risk of incidental poisoning. success. There is also concern that Little Eagles may be at risk of incidental poisoning PROTECTION: IDENTIFYING AND from pest control programs. PROTECTING CRITICAL HABITAT

There has been a long-term program of raptor The primary threat to the Little Eagle is loss of survey and monitoring in the ACT and region habitat, including nest sites and foraging areas. undertaken by community-based naturalists The preferred habitat for the species in the (including Canberra Ornithologists Group and ACT is woodland, grassland and riparian the University of Canberra). It is desirable that areas, especially where these occur together these programs continue and that they include as a mosaic. Conservation objectives and survey and monitoring of active nests, which actions for these habitat types are set out in can provide information on numbers of the relevant Action Plans, namely: breeding pairs and their breeding success. • Action Plan No. 27: Woodlands for Wildlife: ACT Lowland Woodland Conservation Strategy Objective

Action Plan No. 35. Little Eagle 5 • Action Plan No. 28: A Vision Splendid of opinion. The lower Molonglo River valley will the Grassy Plains Extended: ACT Lowland be a focus of attention given land use Native Grassland Conservation Strategy pressures and its historical significance as a • Action Plan No. 29: Ribbons of Life: ACT breeding area for Little Eagles. Aquatic Species and Riparian Zone Conservation Strategy. Objective Habitat sufficient to maintain a viable, wild These action plans provide the main vehicle for population of Little Eagles in the long term is identification and protection of habitat for the maintained in the ACT and region. This Little Eagle in a landscape context. However, includes nesting sites and foraging areas. additional actions will be required to identify and protect nesting sites and associated Actions foraging habitat. The Nature Conservation Act 1. Apply formal measures (reservation, 1980 provides for protection of nest sites. memorandums of understanding, land Other statutory protection mechanisms are management agreements, off-reserve outlined below: conservation mechanisms) to protect and manage Little Eagle habitat in the ACT that 1. Reservation: The strongest statutory complement actions in ACT conservation mechanism for protecting sites of strategies (Action Plans 27, 28, 29). conservation significance. Extensive 2. Give identified nest sites and foraging riverine in the Murrumbidgee River areas a high priority for protection. Protect Corridor and the Lower Molonglo River known previous nest sites at Molonglo Corridor are protected in this way. Valley, Uriarra East and Dunlop with a buffer. 2. Memorandum of Understanding (MOU): MOUs between the ACT Government and 3. Undertake management actions on ACT landholders, including the Commonwealth Government managed land, and provide Government, provide a means by which specifications and advice to other sites of conservation significance can be landholders and managers, aimed at managed to protect their values, while protecting Little Eagle habitat. enabling other compatible land uses to occur. Indicators 1. Formal measures have been taken to 3. Land Management Agreements (LMA) protect and manage Little Eagle habitat in for leased rural land: LMAs establish an the ACT, with a high priority given to nest agreed framework for sustainable sites and foraging areas. management of the land. Management 2. Management actions have been taken on standards may be agreed in recognition of ACT Government managed land aimed at particular conservation issues. protecting habitat.

3. Specifications and advice on conserving 4. Off-reserve conservation on Public or Little Eagle habitat has been provided to : Unleased Land within the urban area other landholders and land managers who Not all public land is reserved for nature manage land where habitat occurs. conservation, but conservation values may

be present notwithstanding. The general

provisions of the Nature Conservation Act REGIONAL CO-OPERATION 1980 apply, including the protection of

nests. The Nature Conservation Act 1980 Habitat for the Little Eagle in the South Eastern also has provisions for the Conservator to Highlands bioregion is under ecological stress give directions for the protection of native generally and regional population decline of plants and (Conservator the species is evident. Liaison with agencies directions). outside the ACT that are involved in the

conservation of the Little Eagle is essential for The results of monitoring and research will be a regional conservation effort. used to establish a minimum set of attributes that must be satisfied to adequately protect a Objective nest site and associated foraging area. Where the required studies or ecological data are Actions to conserve the Little Eagle in the ACT currently lacking, as an urgent interim are part of a coordinated regional approach. measure, conservation actions will be based on best available knowledge and expert

Action Plan No. 35. Little Eagle 6 Action the continued presence of a breeding pairs in The ACT will promote a coordinated regional the Molonglo Valley will require consideration conservation effort for the Little Eagle by of habitat protection during planning for urban continuing to liaise with other State and development. Commonwealth conservation agencies. It is possible that the presence of Little Eagle Indicator habitat on rural leases will have economic implications in the form of land use constraints, Regional liaison is maintained and ACT management requirements to achieve conservation efforts are complemented by conservation goals, or acquisition for actions throughout the South Eastern reservation purposes. It is also possible that Highlands bioregion. the presence of habitat will enable rural leases

to continue, if future urban development of COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT these areas is precluded.

Community engagement can assist the For many people in the ACT, the presence of achievement of conservation goals by fostering bushland and wildlife are important aspects of an appreciation of both the issues involved the Canberra urban landscape and lifestyle. (particularly the ecological, economic and There are correspondingly significant social effects of land planning and land community concerns about further loss of management) and of the actions required to ecological communities and their component conserve biodiversity. Community engagement native species in the ACT. is also important for accessing community knowledge and resources (for example, wildlife expertise or capacity to undertake volunteer activities). In the case of the Little Eagle, Legislative provisions knowledge of its conservation status and threats to its future well-being in the ACT are, The following legislation applies to the to a significant extent, a product of community conservation of flora and fauna in the ACT: knowledge and efforts. ACT Legislation Objectives 1. The community is informed of the Nature Conservation Act 1980 conservation issues regarding the Little Eagle. The Nature Conservation Act 1980 protects native plants and animals and the nests of 2. Community based conservation activities native animals. It establishes the Conservator focused on the Little Eagle continue and of Flora and Fauna and specified activities are grow. controlled via a licensing system. The Conservator may give the occupier of land Actions directions for the protection or conservation of 1. Provide the community with information native plants and animals on the land. The Act about the conservation requirements for also provides authority for the management of the Little Eagle. public land that is reserved for conservation of 2. Encourage and support the continuation the natural environment. Special measures for and further development of community conservation of a species or community of based conservation activities related to the concern can be introduced. Little Eagle, particularly with regard to conservation and management of habitat. Planning and Development Act 2007

Indicator The object of this Act is to provide a planning There is active, well-informed and ongoing and land system that contributes to the orderly involvement of the community in the and sustainable development of the ACT. The conservation of the Little Eagle. Act establishes the Territory Plan; provides for the identification, reservation and management of Public Land; and outlines requirements for environmental impact assessment. Socio-economic issues

Protection of Little Eagle habitat may result in land-use constraints that could affect future urban development opportunities. In particular, Heritage Act 2004

Action Plan No. 35. Little Eagle 7

This Act establishes a system for the The review will provide an opportunity for both recognition, registration and conservation of the Flora and Fauna Committee and relevant natural and cultural heritage places and section(s) of the ACT Government to assess objects. A list of these places is maintained on progress; take account of new knowledge of the ACT Heritage Register. the species and threats; consider new developments in policy and administration; and Commonwealth Legislation review directions and priorities for future conservation actions. Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 Acknowledgements The Environment Protection and Biodiversity

Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) is the Bill Logan, Murray Evans, Stephen Debus and primary Commonwealth legislation for Kevin Frawley contributed significantly to the environment protection. Under the EPBC Act, preparation of this Action Plan. The illustration an action will require approval from the of the species (Figure 1) was prepared for the (Commonwealth) Environment Minister if the ACT Government by Leslie Wallington. action has, will have, or is likely to have a significant impact on a matter of national environmental significance and it is not subject to certain specified exceptions. Matters of References national environmental significance are: World Heritage and National Heritage properties, ACT Government 2010. ACT Woodland Ramsar wetlands of international importance, Restoration Implementation Plan. nationally listed threatened species and Unpublished report by Department of ecological communities, migratory species Territory and Municipal Services. Viewed protected under international agreements, 29 March 2011. Commonwealth marine environment and Baker-Gabb DJ 1984. The breeding ecology of The Little Eagle is not currently a species listed twelve species of diurnal raptor in north- under the EPBC Act. It does, however, use western Victoria, Australian Wildlife Yellow Box – Red Gum grassy woodland Research 11: 145–160. which is a component of the EPBC listed ecological community: White Box – Yellow Box Barrett G, Silcocks A, Barry S, Cunningham R – Red Gum Grassy Woodland and Derived and Poulter R 2003. The New Atlas of Native Grassland (listed as critically Australian Birds (Royal Australasian endangered). Ornithologists Union, Hawthorn East, Victoria). Barrett GW, Silcocks AF, Cunningham R, Oliver Implementation and review DL, Weston MA and Baker J 2007. Comparison of atlas data to determine the

conservation status of bird species in New The ACT Government (Conservation South Wales, with emphasis on woodland- Research, Environment and Sustainable dependent species, Australian Zoology 34: Development Directorate) has responsibility for 37–77. coordinating implementation of this Action Plan. Some actions will involve collaboration Blakers M, Davies SJJF, Reilly PN 1984. The between government agencies, research Atlas of Australian Birds (Melbourne organisations and the community. University Press, Melbourne). Bounds J 2008. Nomination of a vulnerable The Flora and Fauna Committee will review species to the ACT Flora and Fauna implementation of this Action Plan after three Committee: Little Eagle, Canberra Bird years. The review will comprise an assessment Notes 33: 84–95. of achievement of the objectives of the Action Debus S 1998. The Birds of Prey of Australia: A Plan, recognising that the timeframe for Field Guide (Oxford University Press, achieving some objectives are necessarily Melbourne). longer than the duration of this Action Plan. Debus S 2005. Potential impacts of proposed Assessment of progress will be based on urban development on the raptors in the achieving the relevant indicator for each Action.

Action Plan No. 35. Little Eagle 8 Molonglo Valley, ACT. Unpublished report to Olsen J, Fuentes E, Rose AB and Frost S 2006. ACT Planning and Land Authority, Canberra. Food and hunting of eight breeding raptors Debus S 2008. Raptors and the proposed near Canberra, 1990–1994, Australian Field Central Molonglo Development, Canberra Ornithology 26: 77–95. Bird Notes 33: 81–83. Olsen J and Osgood M 2006. Numbers of Debus S and Rose AB 1999. Notes on the diet breeding Little Eagles in the Australian of the Wedge-tailed Eagle Aquila audax, Capital Territory in 2006, Canberra Bird Australian Bird Watcher 18: 38–41. Notes 31: 178–182. Debus SJS, Hatfield TS, Ley AJ and Rose AB Olsen J, Osgood M, Maconachie M and Dabb G 2007. Breeding Biology and Diet of the Little 2008. Numbers of breeding Little Eagles Eagle Hieraaetus morphnoides in the New Hieraaetus morphnoides in the Australian England Region of New South Wales, Capital Territory in 2007, Canberra Bird Australian Field Ornithology 24: 137–157. Notes 33: 77–80. Debus SJS and Ley AJ 2009. Aspects of the Olsen J, Osgood M, Maconachie M, Dabb G breeding cycle of the Little Eagle Hieraaetus and Butterfield M 2009. Numbers of morphnoides, Australian Field Ornithology breeding Little Eagles Hieraaetus 26: 76–99. morphnoides in the Australian Capital Territory in 2008, Canberra Bird Notes 34: DSEWPC (Department of Sustainability, 81–85. Environment, Water, Population and Communities) 2011. Australia’s bioregions Olsen J, Judge D, Fuentes E, Rose AB and (Australian Government, Canberra). Viewed Debus SJS 2010. Diets of Wedge-tailed 5 July 2011. Eagles (Aquila audax) and Little Eagles (Hieraaetus morphnoides) beeding near Canberra, Australia, Journal of Raptor Ferguson-Lees J and Christie DA 2001. Research 44: 50–61. Raptors of the World (Helm, London). Olsen J, Osgood M, Maconachie M, Dabb G Gould J 1841. The Zoology of the Voyage of and Butterfield M 2010. Little Eagles, HMS Beagle, Vol. III Birds (London). Whistling Kites and Swamp Harriers in the Lunney D (2004) A test of our civilisation: Australian Capital Territory 2009, Canberra Conserving Australia’s forest fauna across a Bird Notes 35: 81–84. cultural landscape. In ‘Conservation of Olsen J, Osgood M, Maconachie M, Dabb G Australia’s Forest Fauna (2nd edn)’. (Ed. D and Butterfield M 2012. Little Eagles, Lunney) pp. 1-22. (Royal Zoological Society Whistling Kites and Swamp Harriers in the of NSW: Sydney) Australian Capital Territory 2010, Canberra Marchant S and Higgins PJ eds. 1993. Bird Notes 36: 155–157. Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Olsen P, Weston M, Tzaros C, Silcocks A 2005. Antarctic Birds Vol. 2 (Oxford University The State of Australia’s Birds 2005: Press, Melbourne). Woodlands and Birds. Supplement to Morgan G 2000. Landscape Health in Australia: Wingspan 15. A rapid assessment of the relative condition Taylor McC and Canberra Ornithologists Group of Australia’s bioregions and subregions 1992. Birds of the Australian Capital (Environment Australia, Canberra). Territory: An Atlas (Canberra Ornithologists Olsen J (1992). Raptors in Namadgi, Canberra Group and the National Capital Planning Nature Parks, theMurrumbidgee River Authority, Canberra). Corridor and on the Googong Foreshore,

ACT with special emphasis on the . Report to the ACT Parks and Conservation Service. Olsen J and Fuentes E 2004. Preliminary report on the effect of the development of the Molonglo Valley on the community of birds of prey. Unpublished report to the ACT Government. Applied Ecology Research Group, University of Canberra. Olsen J and Fuentes E 2005. Collapse in numbers of breeding Little Eagles in the Australian Capital Territory, Canberra Bird Notes 30: 141–145.

Action Plan No. 35. Little Eagle 9 List of Action Plans • Two-spined Blackfish (Gadopsis bispinosus)

• Trout Cod (Maccullochella In accordance with Section 23 of the Nature macquariensis) Conservation Act 1980, Action Plans are • Macquarie Perch (Macquaria prepared by the Conservator of Flora and australasica) Fauna. The following are current: • Murray River Crayfish (Euastacus

armatus) No. 5: A subalpine herb (Gentiana • Silver Perch (Bidyanus bidyanus) baeuerlenii) —an endangered species. • Tuggeranong Lignum (Muehlenbeckia No. 6: Corroboree Frog (Pseudophryne tuggeranong) corroboree)—a vulnerable species. • Pink-tailed Worm (Aprasia No. 22: Brush-tailed Rock-wallaby (Petrogale parapulchella) penicillata)—an endangered species. No. 23: Smoky Mouse (Pseudomys fumeus)— No. 30: Spotted-tailed Quoll (Dasyurus an endangered species. maculatus)—a vulnerable species. No. 27: Woodlands for Wildlife: ACT Lowland No. 31: Canberra Spider Orchid (Arachnorchis Woodland Conservation Strategy. actensis) – an endangered species Incorporating Action Plans for the No. 32: Brindabella Midge Orchid (Corunastylis following threatened species and ectopa) – an endangered species communities: No. 33: Glossy Black- • Yellow Box – Red Gum Grassy (Calyptorhynchus lathami) – a Woodland vulnerable species • A Leek Orchid (Prasophyllum petilum) No. 34: Murrumbidgee Bossiaea (Bossiaea • Small Purple Pea (Swainsona recta) grayi) – an endangered species • Hooded Robin (Melanodryas cucullata) • Swift Parrot (Lathamus discolor) • Superb Parrot (Polytelis swainsonii) FURTHER INFORMATION • Brown Tree creeper (Climacteris picumnus) Further information on this Action Plan or other • Painted Honeyeater (Grantiella picta) threatened species and ecological • Regent Honeyeater (Xanthomyza communities can be obtained from: phrygia) Conservation Research unit, Environment and • Varied Sitella (Daphoenositta Sustainable Development Directorate chrysoptera) • White-winged Triller (Lalage sueurii) Phone: (02) 132281

No. 28: A Vision Splendid of the Grassy Plains Environment and Sustainable Development Extended: ACT Lowland Native Directorate Website: Grassland Conservation Strategy. http://www.esdd.act.gov.au/ Incorporating Action Plans for the following threatened species and This document should be cited as: communities: ACT Government 2013. Little Eagle • Natural Temperate Grassland (Hieraaetus morphnoides). Action Plan No. 35. • Striped Legless Lizard (Delma impar) ACT Government, Canberra. • Grassland Earless Dragon (Tympanocryptis pinguicolla) • Golden Sun Moth (Synemon plana) • Perunga Grasshopper (Perunga ochracea) • Button Wrinklewort (Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides) • Ginninderra Peppercress (Lepidium ginninderrense)

No. 29: Ribbons of Life: ACT Aquatic Species and Riparian Zone Conservation Strategy. Incorporating Action Plans for the following threatened species and communities:

Action Plan No. 35. Little Eagle 10