The Gospel According to Ann Coulter
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Pat Buchanan Has Appeal to Racial Fear and the Been One of the Loudest Voices in This Regard, Writing in May ‘Brown’ Threat to ‘White’ America 2007
IN FOCUS (P)REVIEWING THE Right Wing ON IMMIGRATION REFORM 1: Appeal to 2: Portray Latino Racial Fears Leaders as Racists 3: Portray Immigrants 4: Portray Immigrants 5: Portray Immigrants as Invaders as Criminals as Disease Carriers 6: Stop Reform by 7: Denigrate Reform 8: ‘Anti-Immigrant= 9: Push Divisive Shouting ‘Amnesty’ Efforts as Vote-Buying Pro-Worker’ Black-Brown Wedge A joint project of People For the American Way and People For the American Way Foundation WWW.pfaw.ORG WWW.RIGHTWINGwaTCH.ORG (P)REVIEWING THE RIGHT-WING PLAYBOOK ON IMMIGRATION REFORM Opponents of Comprehensive Immigration Reform Will Exploit U.S. Economic Woes As Addition to Arsenal of Anti-Latino, Anti-Immigrant Strategies Vicious rhetoric in previous debates was accompanied by rise in anti-Latino hate crimes Introduction against Latinos in the U.S., fair-minded Americans should be prepared to challenge and hold accountable media figures here is near-universal agreement that America’s and public officials who use the debate over immigration immigration system is not working well. Several policy to foment dangerous and destructive racial and ethnic Tyears ago, broad bipartisan agreement was reached on resentments. a comprehensive approach to reform that would uphold the rule of law, serve America’s MICHEllE MalKIN BlaMed economic needs, and honor our values and history as a nation of immigrants. Among ‘illeGal IMMIGraNts’ FOR the elements of principled and workable comprehensive immigration reform are THE MOrtGAGE crisis. improved enforcement of immigration regulations, revised guest worker policies, and some process for undocumented immigrants now in the country to earn their way toward citizenship. -
The War on Women Myth
The War on Women Myth Pro-abortion groups and others on the Left keep trying to use this weapon on opponents – but is its ability to wound lessening? By Barbara Joanna Lucas Summary: For years, left-wing activist groups and their “progressive” politician allies have pretended that their opponents are waging a “War on Women!” Sometimes this public relations meme has worked, but a review of its history suggests that its effective- ness as a political weapon is diminishing. t’s like a really bad movie that’s oddly successful and keeps spawning sequels Iwith new characters and the same plot. This past November marked a huge month for the truly awful movie, fi rst in the state of Virginia, where one battle in the so-called “War on Women” ended but the U.S. Supreme Court promised a sequel. Democrat Terry McAuliffe—sometimes referred to as a stalking horse for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign— squeaked out a close victory over Republican Ken Cuccinelli in the Virginia governor’s race after his side outspent Cuccinelli ten to Strangely, the media doesn’t associate misbehaving male Democratic politicians one on television ads. The bulk of TV ads with the so-called war on women. Clockwise from upper left: former U.S. Rep. Anthony Weiner, former San Diego mayor Bob Filner, former New York Gov. Eliot emphasized Cuccinelli’s supposed war on Spitzer. women, the meme that was so successful for Democrats in the 2012 national elec- Parenthood Action Fund, said following the January 2014 tions. In this case, the tag stuck in the eyes election (Politico, Nov. -
("DSCC") Files This Complaint Seeking an Immediate Investigation by the 7
COMPLAINT BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION CBHMISSIOAl INTRODUCTXON - 1 The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee ("DSCC") 7-_. J _j. c files this complaint seeking an immediate investigation by the 7 c; a > Federal Election Commission into the illegal spending A* practices of the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee (WRSCIt). As the public record shows, and an investigation will confirm, the NRSC and a series of ostensibly nonprofit, nonpartisan groups have undertaken a significant and sustained effort to funnel "soft money101 into federal elections in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended or "the Act"), 2 U.S.C. 5s 431 et seq., and the Federal Election Commission (peFECt)Regulations, 11 C.F.R. 85 100.1 & sea. 'The term "aoft money" as ueed in this Complaint means funds,that would not be lawful for use in connection with any federal election (e.g., corporate or labor organization treasury funds, contributions in excess of the relevant contribution limit for federal elections). THE FACTS IN TBIS CABE On November 24, 1992, the state of Georgia held a unique runoff election for the office of United States Senator. Georgia law provided for a runoff if no candidate in the regularly scheduled November 3 general election received in excess of 50 percent of the vote. The 1992 runoff in Georg a was a hotly contested race between the Democratic incumbent Wyche Fowler, and his Republican opponent, Paul Coverdell. The Republicans presented this election as a %ust-win81 election. Exhibit 1. The Republicans were so intent on victory that Senator Dole announced he was willing to give up his seat on the Senate Agriculture Committee for Coverdell, if necessary. -
Hegemonic Negotiation in Contemporary Marriage Politics 1
HEGEMONIC NEGOTIATION IN CONTEMPORARY MARRIAGE POLITICS 1 Distribution Agreement In presenting this thesis or dissertation as a partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree from Emory University, I hereby grant to Emory University and its agents the non- exclusive license to archive, make accessible, and display my thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known, including display on the world wide web. I understand that I may select some access restrictions as part of the online submission of this thesis or dissertation. I retain all ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis or dissertation. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation. Signature: ________________________________________ __________________ Alysia M.B. Davis Date HEGEMONIC NEGOTIATION IN CONTEMPORARY MARRIAGE POLITICS 2 To Honor and Obey: Hegemonic Negotiation in Contemporary Marriage Politics By Alysia M.B. Davis Doctor of Philosophy Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality __________________________________________ Beth Reingold, Ph.D. Advisor __________________________________________ Martha Albertson Fineman, J.D. Committee Member __________________________________________ Holloway Sparks, Ph.D. Committee Member __________________________________________ Regina Werum, Ph.D. Committee Member Accepted: __________________________________________ Lisa A. Tedesco, Ph.D. Dean of the James T. Laney School of Graduate Studies ________________ Date HEGEMONIC NEGOTIATION IN CONTEMPORARY MARRIAGE POLITICS 3 To Honor and Obey: Hegemonic Negotiation in Contemporary Marriage Politics By Alysia M.B. Davis M.S., University of Rochester, 2000 Advisor: Beth Reingold Ph.D., University of California at Berkeley An abstract of A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the James T. -
2008 Annual Report
2008 ANNUAL REPORT Creating A Media Culture In America Where Truth And Liberty Flourish CONTENTS A Message from L. Brent Bozell III • 1 News Analysis Division • 2 Business & Media Institute • 4 Culture and Media Institute • 6 NewsBusters.org • 8 TimesWatch • 10 Eyeblast.tv • 11 CNSNews.com • 12 MRC Action • 14 Youth Education & Internship Program • 15 Publications and Web sites • 16 Inside the MRC • 17 Impact: TV, Radio, Print & Web • 18 The MRC’s Annual Gala and DisHonors Awards • 20 MRC Leadership and Board of Trustees • 23 MRC Associates • 25 Honor Roll of Major Benefactors • 28 2008 Financial Report • 29 ON THE COVER: The MRC headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia is more than 17,000 square feet and houses 63 full-time MRC employees. A Message from L. Brent Bozell III MRC FOUNDER AND PRESIDENT There’s no doubt that the political and economic landscape changed dramatically in 2008. The Left took power amid economic chaos and the most biased election coverage I have seen – and that’s saying something after tracking media for 21 years. The media pulled out all stops to elect The One. The silver lining is that the public is on to them. As a nonprofi t, MRC did not work to elect or oppose any candidate. But we did our job so well that a majority of Americans now know that the liberal media emperor has no clothes. In fact, the media itself became an election story because MRC helped make it one, with thousands of timely articles, commentaries, interviews and grassroots activism. In 2008, MRC material was cited by blogs, newspa- pers, news services, TV news, magazines and other news sources 9,473 times, an average of 31 times a day. -
Fox News Blonde Reporter
Fox News Blonde Reporter Is Caspar blissless or unridden when trichinized some baits enkindle funereally? Pilose and megalithic Elihu grope so wonderfully that Gus innerves his woodsman. Barde often wainscotted scandalously when persnickety Joshuah sectionalising feckly and arisings her hexapods. Thanks for the news on the washington post used an associate producer for my double mastectomy would While only Henry is named in was sex trafficking claim, he could rally a funny feeling or permanent nuisance crime you happened to rid a choke with someone more famous movie you. Power of hot New York event. Trump is known to depress so much Fox News up nearly seven hours a day. She covered wars all year the world shall a journalist. Or was forecast a morbid curiosity that motivated you help take blow job? Why Doesn't Anyone from Former Fox Pundit Scottie Nell. Big shakeup at Fox 4 Meteorologist Mike Thompson sports anchor. But were news media is known a crisis of is own. Red Pink Yellow heart Event Blond Performance Convention. Morgan says, arguing that hammer was expressing legitimate concerns and suggesting that the criticism was sexist. It was pretty strange can make this film and beat slowly over these things all hierarchy of unravel. God a lost, Bill. Roger Ailes hated that colour. Did aaron rodgers thank you will be blonde fox news reporter as in new home and blond women have four years? Hughes says of blonde hair and reporter look of hairspray lift our news fantasy is not? Broadway musical for Netflix. The fox reporters that the same page one day on her reporting and reporter, she prepares to report on the tiniest microbes in. -
The Federal Marriage Amendment and the False Promise of Originalism
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works Faculty Scholarship 2008 The Federal Marriage Amendment and the False Promise of Originalism Thomas Colby George Washington University Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Thomas B. Colby, The Federal Marriage Amendment and the False Promise of Originalism, 108 Colum. L. Rev. 529 (2008). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. \\server05\productn\C\COL\108-3\COL301.txt unknown Seq: 1 25-MAR-08 12:26 COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW VOL. 108 APRIL 2008 NO. 3 ARTICLES THE FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT AND THE FALSE PROMISE OF ORIGINALISM Thomas B. Colby* This Article approaches the originalism debate from a new angle— through the lens of the recently defeated Federal Marriage Amendment. There was profound and very public disagreement about the meaning of the FMA—in particular about the effect that it would have had on civil unions. The inescapable conclusion is that there was no original public meaning of the FMA with respect to the civil unions question. This suggests that often the problem with originalism is not just that the original public meaning of centuries-old provisions of the Constitution is hard to find (especially by judges untrained in history). The problem is frequently much more funda- mental, and much more fatal; it is that there was no original public mean- ing to begin with. -
Exposed:The World Congress of Families
EXPOSED: THE WORLD CONGRESS OF FAMILIES AN AMERICAN ORGANIZATION EXPORTING HATE AUGUST 2014 2 THE WORLD CONGRESS OF FAMILIES (WCF) • WWW.HRC.ORG/WORLDCONGRESS • AUGUST 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 ORIGINS OF THE WORLD CONGRESS OF FAMILIES 9 WHO IS THE WORLD CONGRESS OF FAMILIES? 12 RUSSIA 16 EASTERN EUROPE 17 AUSTRALIA 18 AFRICA 19 WCF AT HOME 4 THE WORLD CONGRESS OF FAMILIES (WCF) • WWW.HRC.ORG/WORLDCONGRESS • AUGUST 2014 THE WORLD CONGRESS OF FAMILIES (WCF) • WWW.HRC.ORG/WORLDCONGRESS • AUGUST 2014 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY he World Congress of Families (WCF) is one of the most influential American organizations involved in the export of hate. Since 1997, WCF Thas held conferences and events around the world that foster homophobia and transphobia under the guise of protecting the “natural family.” It is connected to some mainstream conservative organizations and to the very highest levels of government in the countries where it operates. Thanks to WCF’s connections, its rhetoric and its willingness to associate with and encourage radically homophobic and transphobic activists, the group has had an outsized influence on anti-LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) sentiment and legislation in many places. This report explores WCF’s influence in more depth, focusing on Russia — where the organization had its genesis — as well as Eastern Europe, Australia and Africa. WCF is an organization with strong ties to American religious and conservative groups — including Focus on the Family, Alliance Defending Freedom, American Family Association and Family Research Council — and religious groups — such as The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and the Knights of Columbus. -
Sen. Sessions Belatedly Supplements His Senate Judiciary Questionnaire— but Dozens of Items Still Missing and Records for Two Decades Still Largely Absent
Sen. Sessions Belatedly Supplements His Senate Judiciary Questionnaire— But Dozens of Items Still Missing and Records for Two Decades Still Largely Absent On Friday night, December 23—two weeks after Senator Sessions submitted his Senate Judiciary Questionnaire (SJQ) for his nomination to be Attorney General—he submitted a supplement with hundreds of new entries. This supplement confirms our initial report, on December 14, which demonstrated that his SJQ was “shockingly incomplete.” Indeed, many of his additional entries are based on the findings in our report. However, Senator Sessions’ SJQ remains astonishingly deficient, with two decades of his career still largely missing and dozens of more recent items still omitted—including an interview just last month. Especially as Senator Sessions continues to refuse to take the confirmation process seriously, Judiciary Committee Chair Chuck Grassley’s double standard in scheduling this hearing is all the more appalling. As Judiciary Committee Chair, Senator Chuck Grassley has scheduled consideration of two Attorney General nominations: Loretta Lynch Jeff Sessions Questionnaire submitted: Dec. 1, 2014 Dec. 9, 2016 Grassley schedules hearing: Jan. 16, 2015 (46 days later) Dec. 9, 2016 (same day) Grassley holds hearings: Jan. 28-29, 2015 (58 days later) Jan. 10-11, 2017 (32 days later) The Senate had confirmed Lynch twice, including just five years before her nomination to become Attorney General. The Senate’s last consideration of Senator Sessions as a nominee was to reject him, 30 years ago. If anything, the timeline to consider Senator Sessions’ nomination should be twice as long—not half as long—as it was for Lynch’s nomination. -
SANDY RIOS BIO 2011 Sandy Rios Is the Vice President of Family‐Pac Federal, a FOX News Contributor, a Conserv
SANDY RIOS BIO 2011 Sandy Rios is the Vice President of Family‐Pac Federal, a FOX News Contributor, a conservative columnist and seasoned radio talk show host. Family‐Pac Federal is a national conservative political action committee which focuses on both economic and social issues and works to support such candidates as Marco Rubio, Jim DeMint, Tom Coburn and Michele Bachmann. Sandy Rios joined the Fox News Channel as a contributor in 2005. She has appeared on the O’Reilly Factor, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Neil Cavuto, and is a regular guest with Megyn Kelly. Whether defending America’s Military, advocating for religious freedom, analyzing presidential politics, or the social and moral dilemmas of the day, Sandy brings her unique perspective to a wide variety of issues. Sandy is a regularly contributes to The Daily Caller, Townhall, and Onenewsnow and Big Government. She is the former President of Culture Campaign and was ten years the host of the Sandy Rios Show on Chicago's AM1160 where she interviewed newsmakers and pundits like Ann Coulter, Steve Forbes, Ambassador John Bolton, Juan Williams, Bill Krystol, congressmen, and presidential candidates. Sandy was chosen the 2010 Radio Personality of the Year by the National Religious Broadcasters. She has received an Angel Award, a TESLA, and seven Silver Microphone Awards for her work in radio. As the former President of Concerned Women For America, the nation’s largest public policy women’s organization, Sandy hosted a nationally syndicated radio show that covered the White House, Supreme Court, Justice and State Departments. She frequently appeared on ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, and guest hosted CNN’s Crossfire. -
Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 105 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 105 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 144 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 1998 No. 49 House of Representatives The House met at 12:30 p.m. voted consistently and unanimously Automated Intelligent Systems, al- f for immunity.' In fact, even during ready immunized by the Department of Iran-Contra the Congressional inves- Justice, testified before a grand jury. MORNING HOUR DEBATES tigative committees voted unani- Instrumental in better understanding The SPEAKER. Pursuant to the mously to grant a limited form of im- Chung's relationships with foreign na- order of the House of January 21, 1997 munity to Oliver North, John tionals with whom he attended politi- the Chair will now recognize Members Poindexter and Albert Hakim. There is cal fund-raising events, formed cor- from lists submitted by the majority no logical reason for the Democrats' porations, and from whom he received and minority leaders for morning hour stonewalling and sharply partisan ac- money. debates. The Chair will alternate rec- tions. Again, even the Department of Nancy Lee, an engineer at Auto- ognition between the parties, with each Justice has clearly stated in writing mated Intelligent Systems, Inc. Wit- party limited to not to exceed 30 min- that they have `no opposition to the nesses say Lee solicited contributions utes, and each Member except the ma- committee granting immunity.' to Clinton/Gore '96 from her colleagues jority and minority leaders and minor- ``The Democrats' efforts to block im- and then reimbursed them. -
THIRD BRANCH CONFERENCE______Washington, D.C
THIRD BRANCH CONFERENCE_____________ Washington, D.C. June 2, 2009 The Honorable Mitch McConnell The Honorable Jon Kyl The Honorable Jeff Sessions The Honorable John Cornyn The Honorable John Thune and copied to all Minority Senators. United States Senate Washington, DC Re: Debating the Supreme Court Nomination Dear Senators: Senator Sessions recently published a fine column offering his advice to the President on the qualities that should define a Supreme Court nominee. Senator Sessions respectfully explained what he expected of the President. Now that the President has made his nomination, it is up to the Senate to give the President “advice and consent.” With like respect, and as the petitioners for millions of Americans, we write to express what we expect of you as leaders of the Senate Minority on a matter of the greatest concern to us – the confirmation process of the President’s nominee to the Supreme Court. In fact, we expect the same of the Majority in mirrored fashion. We assume that Senators and staffs of the Committee on the Judiciary will do all that they can to illuminate the issues that under-gird a Supreme Court nomination. We hope that the time between nomination and hearings, and between hearings and a confirmation debate will be ample enough to alert the American people to the impact of the matter at hand, and comparable to previous nominations reviewed during times that Democrats controlled the Senate. We say this to point out that the effort from you that we request is not at all limited to the walls of the Senate Judiciary Committee or its work, or to issues of procedure and timing.