TOD Story 9/2/03 11:55 AM Page 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TOD Story 9/2/03 11:55 AM Page 1 TOD Story 9/2/03 11:55 AM Page 1 Washington, D.C., Monday, August 18, 2003 Volume 61, No. 33 The Weekly Newspaper of the Public Transportation Industry Transit Agencies Seeing Increased Interest in Transit-Oriented and Joint Development By Federico Cura potential in both large and small communities Reporter that are served by either bus or rail transit, adding that a successful TOD will reinforce ransit-oriented development both the community and the transit system. and transit-adjacent develop- Another term, joint development, refers ment—terms referring to a to TOD projects located on transit agency form of urban planning that property, sometimes replacing surface park- connects development with and-ride lots. It implies a partnership between locations near public trans- a transit agency and a private-sector entity portationT properties—is growing in popularity such as a developer. as transit systems take an increasingly active role in the process along with developers and Increased Ridership and local governments. Other Benefits Over the past two years, public transit U.S. Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.), a long- agencies have been stepping up efforts to cap- time supporter of “smart growth” planning, italize on underused agency properties that pointed to the numerous U.S. transit agencies can be used for TOD in an effort to boost rid- taking a more active role in supporting TOD. ership, revenues, or for other benefits. In an “The resulting increased ridership and rev- era of tightening budgets, the agencies are enue has benefited these transit agencies, PHOTO BY ROBERT HANSEN PHOTOGRAPHY EMSIEK & PARTNERS COURTESY OF MCLARAND VASQUEZ looking for greater non-farebox revenues, engaged developers and others in the private The Promenade at Rio Vista development in San Diego is a mixed-use project at San Diego Trolley’s which may include TOD. sector, and—perhaps most importantly—sig- Rio Vista Station. TOD often incorporates some sort of nificantly improved the quality of life of the mixed-use development, which may include surrounding communities,” noted Blume- between enhanced property values and loca- outlined several market conditions intensify- high-density residential space and shops; com- nauer, who also is the founder and board pres- tion near Dallas Area Rapid Transit light rail ing over the past few years—such as demo- mercial buildings; entertainment facilities; ident of the annual Rail~Volution conference stations. The study calculated that office graphics—that he sees as making TOD, tran- offices; and public open spaces. The proximity that promotes building livable communities properties located near suburban DART rail sit, and to a transit station connects the development near transit. stations increased in value 53 percent above urban lifestyles more attractive to home to other places, and reduces the dependency While some transit agencies have turned comparable properties not served by light rail, renters, home buyers, and developers. on automobiles. joint development into a significant source of and values of residential properties near the Transit villages typically create pedestrian- non-farebox revenue, others have found it stations rose 39 percent compared with a Removing the Obstacles friendly environments that appear open and helps them gain riders, as well as other benefits group of control properties not served by rail. However, smart growth advocates and transit welcoming to the surrounding community: such as the possibility to expand their systems In a study of Santa Clara County property officials maintain that TOD faces a number neighbors may walk to a nearby station, pick and reach more potential riders or markets. values in 1998 and 1999, a University of Cal- of obstacles and developer disincentives in up a cup of coffee and a newspaper on the way Arrington cited a 2002 Parsons Brincker- ifornia at Berkeley researcher found rents for addition to occasional community opposi- to work, and shop on their way home. hoff report for the state of California showing commercial properties within walking dis- tion. While demographers estimate that as These developments are designed to bring that TOD can yield 20 to 40 percent higher tance of Santa Clara Valley Transportation much as 30 percent of the demand for hous- potential transit riders closer to transit facili- ridership at an individual transit station Authority light rail stations were 23 percent ing is for denser, walkable, mixed-use com- ties, leading to increased ridership through a through both commuter and non-work trips, higher than at non-transit-oriented commer- munities, less than 2 percent of new housing location at, or within one-quarter mile to not to mention increasing overall regional rid- cial buildings. starts are in this category, said Hank Dittmar, one-half mile from, a transit stop, said G.B. ership by up to 5 percent. Arrington quoted the Urban Land Insti- president of a livable communities advocacy Arrington, senior professional associate for Some local governments have seen the tute/PricewaterhouseCoopers publication organization called Reconnecting America. transit-oriented development with Parsons economic development triggered by TOD, Emerging Trends in Real Estate, which empha- Reconnecting America recently created Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas in Portland, and also want to attract these typically urban- sized TOD market fundamentals in its 2002 the Center for Transit Oriented Develop- Ore., and chair of APTA’s Land Use and De- styled, high-density, mixed-use developments. market review, in his recent paper titled Light ment to tackle the many policy, zoning, and velopment Subcommittee. Over the past two decades, according to Ar- Rail and the American City: The State-of-the- planning obstacles facing developers and Arrington noted that different transporta- rington, a growing number of communities Practice for TOD: “Markets served with mass- transit agencies who want to create a TOD or tion consultants define TOD in slightly differ- have married light rail with TOD as part of an transportation alternatives and attractive joint development project. Moreover, ent ways, such as mandating that the transit integrated strategy to revitalize urban close-in neighborhoods should be positioned Dittmar noted, building high-density devel- stop be part of a fixed guideway system such as areas. to sustain better long-term prospects as peo- opment requires a developer with unique ex- rail transit or busway-dependent Bus Rapid For example, a University of North Texas ple strive to make their lives more conve- pertise, which tends to be rare. Transit. He said the TOD process has broad study released in January shows a direct link nient.” In a telephone interview, Arrington TOD may provide the answer to the chal- TOD Story 9/2/03 11:55 AM Page 2 ULI Releases ‘Ten Principles’ for Transit- Oriented Development he Urban Land Institute transit was most often an afterthought in recently published a booklet development,” the report states. T titled Ten Principles for Successful The report lists the 10 principles as Development Around Transit, using re- follows: search done in cooperation with mem- • Make It Better with a Vision; A major joint development project is taking shape in Washington’s Chinatown area at WMATA’s bers of APTA’s Land Use and Develop- • Apply the Power of Partnerships; Gallery Place/Chinatown Metrorail Station. The Metrorail pylon indicating the entrance to the ment Subcommittee. • Think Development When Think- subway station is located to the right of the Chinatown Arch. The joint development project is also The report by Robert Dunphy, Debo- ing About Transit; adjacent to the MCI Center sports/entertainment arena, shown in background at right. rah Myerson, and Michael Pawlukiewicz • Get the Parking Right; compares the pairing of housing and re- • Build a Place, Not a Project; lenge of meeting demand for more com- sisted assets for joint development if cer- tail with stations for light rail, other forms • Make Retail Development Market pact and convenient housing and tain conditions are met as advantageous of rail transit, and Bus Rapid Transit that Driven, Not Transit Driven; lifestyle, according to Dittmar. “Virtually for TOD. The St. Louis transit system has been seen since the late 1990s with • Mix Uses, But Not Necessarily in every major metropolitan area is plan- wants to take advantage of this favorable the streetcar-stop communities that were the Same Place; ning, designing, or constructing a new federal policy change, she said, and will typical of urban areas in the 1920s. “By • Make Buses a Great Idea; transit project at this time,” he said, probably discuss the possibility of allow- the close of the twentieth century, how- • Encourage Every Price Point to adding that new transit stations offer the ing Metro to purchase land around sta- ever, the automobile had become the Live Around Transit; and “opportunity to create new anchors for tions to generate either an eventual one- dominant means of travel in urban cen- • Engage Corporate Attention. growth and development that is oriented time financial benefits or a constant ters, cities with extensive transit net- Copies of the report are available at to transit service.” revenue stream to supplement the works were in decline, and proximity to the ULI web site, <www.uli.org>. Other benefits of TOD listed by tran- agency’s budget. She explained that sit officials include enhanced livability Metro was limited in its joint develop- of surrounding communities; improved ment opportunities because the system air quality that contributes to residents’ purchased only enough land to build the use plan is to transform unfocused devel- velopment from Houston’s developers, health and overall quality of life; and a light rail stations themselves. opment patterns in corridors and wedges banks, retailers, and others. He said he way to begin curbing suburban sprawl Even with these limitations, the St. into compact, mixed-use, pedestrian- also is looking to attach development to and vehicle miles traveled, and ulti- Louis region has seen substantial TOD, friendly development along corridors bus facilities such as major stops and mately meeting stricter ozone standards.
Recommended publications
  • Trolleys Through the Timber - Richard Thompson
    Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society Volume 19 503 Issue 2 Spring 2014 Reminder to members: Please be sure your dues In this issue: are up to date. 2014 dues were due Jan 1, 2014. Trolleys Through the Timber - Richard Thompson....................1 Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society News.......................2 If it has been longer than one year since you renewed, Interpretative Center Update Greg Bonn....................................2 go to our website: oerhs.org and download an Red Trolleys in the Sun Mark Kavanagh..................................5 application by clicking: Become a Member MAX Yellow Line Lou Bowerman ..............................................6 Seattle Transit Update Roy Bonn................................................7 Tucson Sun Link Update Roy Bonn............................................9 See this issue in color on line DC Streetcar Update Roy Bonn..............................................10 at oerhs.org/transfer Pacific Northwest Transit Update Roy Bonn..............................10 Spotlight on Members: Hal Rosene ..........................................11 Trolleys Through the Timber Oregon’s Small Town Streetcar Systems By Richard Thompson The following article is excerpted from Richard's upcoming book, “Trolleys Through the Timber: Oregon's Small Town Streetcar Systems.” As the working title indicates, it will focus upon streetcars outside of Portland. This new endeavor will allow the author to further develop information about small town streetcar systems that previously appeared in his online Oregon Encyclopedia entries, and his four books for Arcadia Publishing. By the turn of the 20th century the Small town streetcar systems often relied on secondhand rolling stock. This interurban- street railway had become a vital part of like Forest Grove Transportation Company car is thought to have started life as a trailer urban transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Developer-Planner Interaction in Transportation and Land Use Sustainability, MTI Report 01-21 Aseem Inam MTI
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by SJSU ScholarWorks San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Mineta Transportation Institute Publications 6-1-2002 Developer-Planner Interaction in Transportation and Land Use Sustainability, MTI Report 01-21 Aseem Inam MTI Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/mti_publications Part of the Transportation Commons Recommended Citation Aseem Inam. "Developer-Planner Interaction in Transportation and Land Use Sustainability, MTI Report 01-21" Mineta Transportation Institute Publications (2002). This Report is brought to you for free and open access by SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mineta Transportation Institute Publications by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MTI Report 01-21 Norman Y. Mineta International Institute for Surface Transportation Policy Studies Created by Congress in 1991 Developer-Planner Interaction in Transportation and Land Use Sustainability Mineta Transportation Institute San Jos é State University San Jose, CA 95192-0219 Developer-Planner Interaction in Transportation and Land Use Sustainability Page 1 of 70 MTI Report 01-21 Developer-Planner Interaction in Transportation and Land Use Sustainability JUNE 2002 Dr. Aseem Inam, University of Michigan Dr. Jonathan Levine, University of Michigan Dr. Richard Werbel, San José State University a publication of the Mineta Transportation Institute College of
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Committee
    San Diego Association of Governments TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE August 1, 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO.: 1 Action Requested: APPROVE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE DISCUSSION AND ACTIONS MEETING OF JULY 18, 2008 The meeting of the Transportation Committee was called to order by Chair Jim Madaffer (City of San Diego) at 9:06 a.m. See the attached attendance sheet for Transportation Committee member attendance. 1. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES Action: Upon a motion by Chair Pro Tem Bob Emery (Metropolitan Transit System [MTS]) and a second by Mayor Lori Holt Pfeiler (North County Inland), the Transportation Committee approved the minutes from the Joint SANDAG Board of Directors/Transportation Committee meeting on June 13, 2008, and the regular Transportation Committee meeting on June 20, 2008. 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS/COMMUNICATIONS/MEMBER COMMENTS Lorraine Leighton, a member of the public, commented that Security was enforcing the use of the restrooms at the downtown Amtrak station for Amtrak customer use only. She asked that trolley, COASTER, and other transit passengers be allowed to use the restrooms. Don Stillwell, a member of the public, submitted written comments and spoke regarding the schedules of the bus and trolley service for Mission Valley, Grantville, and Allied Gardens. Chair Madaffer stated that the committee had been provided with a copy of the response letter that MTS sent to him regarding MTS bus route 14. He stated that he would add this item to a future agenda if the committee members decide to do so, and asked Paul Jablonski, MTS Executive Director, to respond to Mr. Stillwell’s comments and briefly summarize the response letter.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Oriented Communities in the San Diego Region
    San Diego Association of Governments TRANSIT ORIENTED COMMUNITIES IN THE SAN DIEGO REGION DRAFT - CONTEXT REPORT November 2014 DRAFT TRANSIT ORIENTED COMMUNITIES IN EconomicTHE Context SAN Report DIEGO REGION San Diego Regional TOD Strategy DRAFT - CONTEXT REPORT November 2014October 15, 2014 PREPARED FOR: San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) prepared for: PREPARED BY: SANDAG AECOM REGIONAL TOD STRATEGY Fashion Valley Transit Center in the 1980s. Flickr / SDMTS: https://www.flickr.com/photos/sdmts/13441171155/ TRANSIT-ORIENTED COMMUNITIES IN THE SAN DIEGO REGION: CONTEXT REPORT III SANDAG TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Context of Transit-Oriented Communities in the San Diego Region ........................ 1 2 Setting a Foundation for the Future of Transit-Oriented Communities .................... 5 3 Population, Employment, and Housing Growth in the San Diego Region ������������� 13 4 Regional Transit System and Access to Employment ............................................. 27 5 Local Market Readiness and Development Prototypes .......................................... 47 6 Types of Transit-Oriented Communities ................................................................. 59 7 Trends and Considerations ................................................................................... 67 8 Building a Toolbox ................................................................................................ 73 9 Example TOD Projects in the San Diego Region .................................................... 75 APPENDICES A Description
    [Show full text]
  • Downloadable
    Mythcon 50 Looking Back, Moving Forward San Diego, California August 2-5, 2019 Progress Report 2 Things You Need to Know About CONFERENCE REGISTRATION Presenters of papers must register by July 15 or we will assume you won’t be attending the conference and your paper will not be scheduled or listed in the program. Mythcon 50 Registration. We will have at-the-door full conference and day rates posted on our website in mid July but presenters must preregister by July 15. Mythcon 50 Registration About ROOM & BOARD IF YOU ARE STAYING ON CAMPUS you will be given both a “tap card” and a key—there is a $50 fee for not returning either one at checkout ($100 if you don’t return both of them). THEREFORE you must bring a check for $100 made out to the Mythopoeic Society to cover the potential loss of both tap card and key. We will hold your check and hand it back when you turn in your tap card and key (can you tell we’ve had problems with this in the past?). If you don’t have a checking account, inquire of a friend who does—otherwise we’ll have to take a deposit via PayPal or Square and that takes more time at registration. Do you know where your towel is? The dorms include sheets, pillow & pillow case, and a towel (no soap, shampoo, etc.—those amenities aren’t included at SDSU but can be purchased at Trader Joe’s, in case you forget yours) but don’t expect a fluffy deluxe towel.
    [Show full text]
  • SYCUAN GREEN LINE Cable Car Time Schedule & Line Route
    SYCUAN GREEN LINE cable car time schedule & line map 12th & Imperial View In Website Mode The SYCUAN GREEN LINE cable car line (12th & Imperial) has 6 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) 12th & Imperial: 12:29 AM - 11:59 PM (2) Fenton Parkway: 6:51 AM - 10:21 AM (3) Santee: 3:53 AM - 10:06 PM (4) Sdsu: 10:36 PM - 11:36 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest SYCUAN GREEN LINE cable car station near you and ƒnd out when is the next SYCUAN GREEN LINE cable car arriving. Direction: 12th & Imperial SYCUAN GREEN LINE cable car Time Schedule 26 stops 12th & Imperial Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 12:29 AM - 11:59 PM Monday 12:29 AM - 11:59 PM Santee Town Center Station 9896 Mission Gorge Road, Santee Tuesday 12:29 AM - 11:59 PM Gillespie Field Station Wednesday 12:29 AM - 11:59 PM Arnele Avenue Station Thursday 12:29 AM - 11:59 PM Friday 12:29 AM - 11:59 PM El Cajon Station 1136 Palm Ave, El Cajon Saturday 12:29 AM - 11:59 PM Amaya Drive Station 9112 Campina Dr, La Mesa Grossmont Station SYCUAN GREEN LINE cable car Info Direction: 12th & Imperial 70th Street Station Stops: 26 7241 Alvarado Road, La Mesa Trip Duration: 65 min Line Summary: Santee Town Center Station, Alvarado Station Gillespie Field Station, Arnele Avenue Station, El Alvarado Road, San Diego Cajon Station, Amaya Drive Station, Grossmont Station, 70th Street Station, Alvarado Station, Sdsu Sdsu Station Station, Grantville Station, Mission San Diego MTS Busway, San Diego Station, Fenton Parkway Station, Rio Vista Station, Mission Valley Center
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Principles for Successful Development Around Transit
    Ten Principles for Successful Development Around Transit Robert Dunphy Deborah Myerson Michael Pawlukiewicz The Urban Land Institute gratefully acknowledges the financial support of Bank of America in underwriting this project. ABOUT ULI–THE URBAN ULI PROJECT STAFF LAND INSTITUTE Rachelle L. Levitt ULI–the Urban Land Institute is a nonprofit Senior Vice President, Policy and Practice education and research institute that is Publisher supported by its members. Its mission is to provide responsible leadership in the Marta Goldsmith use of land in order to enhance the total Vice President, Land Use Policy environment. Robert Dunphy ULI sponsors education programs and Senior Resident Fellow for Transportation forums to encourage an open international Project Director exchange of ideas and sharing of experi- Michael Pawlukiewicz ences; initiates research that anticipates Director, Environment and Policy Education emerging land use trends and issues and proposes creative solutions based on that Deborah Myerson research; provides advisory services; and Senior Associate, Land Use Policy publishes a wide variety of materials to Nancy H. Stewart disseminate information on land use and Director, Book Program development. Established in 1936, the Managing Editor Institute today has more than 18,000 mem- bers and associates from over 60 countries Sandy Chizinsky representing the entire spectrum of the Manuscript Editor land use and development disciplines. Betsy VanBuskirk Richard M. Rosan Art Director President Book/Cover Design, Layout Diann Stanley-Austin Recommended bibliographic listing: Director, Publishing Operations Dunphy, Robert, Deborah Myerson, and Michael Pawlukiewicz. Ten Principles for Successful Development around Transit. Washington, D.C.: ULI–the Urban Land Institute, 2003. ULI Catalog Number: T18 International Standard Book Number: 0-87420-899-8 Copyright 2003 by ULI–the Urban Land Institute 1025 Thomas Jefferson Street, N.W.
    [Show full text]
  • First and Last Mile Solutions for Transit Centers
    SANDAG First and Last Mile Solutions for Transit Centers Project Report October 2011 Prepared for: San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) Prepared by: SANDAG First and Last Mile Solutions for Transit Centers Project Report Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................... 1 2 STUDY APPROACH .................................................................................................................................. 2 3 STATION SELECTION ............................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 CANDIDATE STATIONS AND STATION SELECTION APPROACH ............................................................................... 3 3.2 INITIAL STATION SCREENING ......................................................................................................................... 5 3.3 NARROWED SET OF STATIONS EVALUATION .................................................................................................. 10 3.4 STATION SELECTION RESULTS ..................................................................................................................... 11 3.5 SELECTED STATIONS – SITE VISITS ............................................................................................................... 16 4 SOLUTION OPTIONS .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Caltrans Project P359, Trip Generation Rates for Transportation Impact Analyses of Smart Growth Land Use Projects
    Caltrans Project P359, Trip Generation Rates for Transportation Impact Analyses of Smart Growth Land Use Projects Final Report Prepared by Texas A&M Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, TX 77843 April 2017 FUNDING This project was funded by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) State Planning & Research Program (SPR) and State Public Transportation Account (PTA) funds provided by the Caltrans Headquarters Divisions of Transportation Planning, and Research, Innovation, and System Information. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There were many individuals who provided technical and administrative support and guidance throughout this project and in the development of project reports and deliverables. Special thanks are extended to the following individuals: • Mr. Marc Birnbaum and Mr. Robert Ferwerda of the Caltrans Traffic Operations Division for their technical guidance, feedback, and support throughout the duration of the project; • Mr. Scott Williams, Mr. Hassan Aboukhadijeh, and Ms. Gloria Gwynne of the Caltrans Division of Research for their management and administration of the project’s contract; and • Members of the project’s Smart Growth Trip Generation (SGTG) Technical Advisory Panel for graciously volunteering their time and sharing their expertise in numerous project webinars and in review and feedback on project methods, analyses, results, and deliverables. The names and organizational affiliation of SGTG panel members are listed on Page 8 of this report. Finally, special thanks are also extended to the dozens of property owners and managers of apartments and office buildings in California that granted Caltrans permission to conduct studies and collect trip generation data at their buildings and properties.
    [Show full text]
  • PYPAG Homework 6
    Ten Principles for Successful Development Around Transit Robert Dunphy Deborah Myerson Michael Pawlukiewicz The Urban Land Institute gratefully acknowledges the financial support of Bank of America in underwriting this project. ABOUT ULI–THE URBAN ULI PROJECT STAFF LAND INSTITUTE Rachelle L. Levitt ULI–the Urban Land Institute is a nonprofit Senior Vice President, Policy and Practice education and research institute that is Publisher supported by its members. Its mission is to provide responsible leadership in the Marta Goldsmith use of land in order to enhance the total Vice President, Land Use Policy environment. Robert Dunphy ULI sponsors education programs and Senior Resident Fellow for Transportation forums to encourage an open international Project Director exchange of ideas and sharing of experi- Michael Pawlukiewicz ences; initiates research that anticipates Director, Environment and Policy Education emerging land use trends and issues and proposes creative solutions based on that Deborah Myerson research; provides advisory services; and Senior Associate, Land Use Policy publishes a wide variety of materials to Nancy H. Stewart disseminate information on land use and Director, Book Program development. Established in 1936, the Managing Editor Institute today has more than 18,000 mem- bers and associates from over 60 countries Sandy Chizinsky representing the entire spectrum of the Manuscript Editor land use and development disciplines. Betsy VanBuskirk Richard M. Rosan Art Director President Book/Cover Design, Layout Diann Stanley-Austin Recommended bibliographic listing: Director, Publishing Operations Dunphy, Robert, Deborah Myerson, and Michael Pawlukiewicz. Ten Principles for Successful Development around Transit. Washington, D.C.: ULI–the Urban Land Institute, 2003. ULI Catalog Number: T18 International Standard Book Number: 0-87420-899-8 Copyright 2003 by ULI–the Urban Land Institute 1025 Thomas Jefferson Street, N.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit-Oriented Development: an Examination of America’S Transit Precincts in 2000 & 2010
    Gulf Coast Research Center for Evacuation and Transportation Resiliency LSU / UNO University Transportation Center Transit-Oriented Development: An Examination of America’s Transit Precincts in 2000 & 2010 Final Report John L. Renne, Ph.D., AICP University of New Orleans with Reid Ewing, Ph.D. University of Utah Sponsoring Agency United States Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration Washington, DC Project # 12-06 June 2013 GULF COAST RESEARCH CENTER FOR EVACUATION AND TRANSPORTATION RESILIENCY The Gulf Coast Research Center for Evacuation and Transportation Resiliency is a collaborative effort between the Louisiana State University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and the University of New Orleans' Department of Planning and Urban Studies. The theme of the LSU-UNO Center is focused on Evacuation and Transportation Resiliency in an effort to address the multitude of issues that impact transportation processes under emergency conditions such as evacuation and other types of major events. This area of research also addresses the need to develop and maintain the ability of transportation systems to economically, efficiently, and safely respond to the changing demands that may be placed upon them. Research The Center focuses on addressing the multitude of issues that impact transportation processes under emergency conditions such as evacuation and other types of major events as well as the need to develop and maintain the ability of transportation systems to economically, efficiently, and safely respond to the changing conditions and demands that may be placed upon them. Work in this area include the development of modeling and analysis techniques; innovative design and control strategies; and travel demand estimation and planning methods that can be used to predict and improve travel under periods of immediate and overwhelming demand.
    [Show full text]
  • GRADING CALIFORNIA's RAIL Transit Station Areas
    GRADING CALIFORNIA’S rail TransiT STATION AREAS October 2015 Ethan N. Elkind Michelle Chan Tuong-Vi Faber ABOUT THIS REPOrt T his report was prepared by the Center for Law, Energy & the Environment (CLEE) at UC Berkeley School of Law and issued by Next 10. ABOUT CLEE T he Center for Law, Energy & the Environment (CLEE) channels the expertise of the Berkeley Law community into pragmatic policy solutions to environmental and energy challenges in California and across the nation. The Center works with government, business, and communities on initiatives that focus on reducing greenhouse gas emissions, advancing the transition to renewable energy, and ensuring clean water for California’s future. ABOUN0 T EXT 1 Next 10 is an independent, nonpartisan organization that educates, engages and empowers Californians to improve the state’s future. With a focus on the intersection between the economy, the environment, and quality of life, Next 10 employs research from leading experts on complex state issues and creates a portfolio of nonpartisan educational materials. ABOU T THE AUTHORS E than Elkind is the Associate Director of the Climate Change and Business Program at CLEE, focusing on land use, renewable energy, and transportation policies. His book Railtown on the history of the modern Los Angeles Metro Rail system was published by University of California Press in January 2014. Michelle Chan is a practicing Canadian lawyer and researcher with CLEE. Her previous research contributions include publications with the Harvard Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative and the British Institute of International and Comparative Law. Tuong-Vi Faber is a practicing attorney at a US law firm and a former Visiting Scholar at UC Berkeley School of Law.
    [Show full text]