Initial Environmental Examination
November 2011 Project no. 43901-01
Municipal Waste to Energy Project (People’s Republic of China)
Suzhou Phase III Waste-to-Energy Subproject
Prepared by China Everbright International Limited for the Asian Development Bank (ADB)
This initial environmental examination report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation on or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Municipal Solid Waste Waste-to-Energy Project Phase III Expansion, Everbright Environmental Energy (Suzhou) Limited The Report of Environmental Impacts of the BOT Project of Suzhou Phase Waste-To-Energy Power Plant
Construction Unit: Everbright Environmental Energy (Suzhou) Limited
2011 11
I Municipal Solid Waste Waste-to-Energy Project Phase III Expansion, Everbright Environmental Energy (Suzhou) Limited Content
1 Overview ...... 1
1.1 Preface ...... 1
1.2 Basis of Compilation ...... 3
1.3 Assessment Purposes and Working Principles ...... 9
1.4 Assessment Factors ...... 10
1.5 Assessment Grade ...... 11
1.6 Assessment Range ...... 15
1.7 Object of Environment Sensitivity Protection ...... 16
1.8 Assessment Standard ...... 17
1.9 Process of Assessment ...... 26
2 Environment Overview ...... 28
2.1 Overview of Natural Environment ...... 28
2.2 Overview of Social Economy ...... 33 2.3 Overview of Regional Master Plan and Environmental
Protection Plan ...... 36
3 Reviews on Existing projects ...... 50
3.1 Overview of Existing Projects ...... 50
3.2 Overview of Technological Process ...... 52
3.3 Raw and Auxiliary Materials Consumption ...... 58 3.4 Water Supply, Drainage and Water Balance of Existing
Projects 62
3.5 Discharge Conditions of Main Pollutants ...... 64 3.6 Official and Written Reply of Existing Projects and
Implement Condition of “Three-meanwhile” Policy ...... 73
3.7 Main Environment Problems of Existing Projects ...... 81
3.8 The Measures of “Using New Method to Improve Old One” ...... 81
4 Engineering Analysis of Phase Expansion Project ...... 83
II Municipal Solid Waste Waste-to-Energy Project Phase III Expansion, Everbright Environmental Energy (Suzhou) Limited
4.1 The Necessity of Phase Expansion Project ...... 83
4.2 Basic Composition of Phase Expansion Project ...... 84
4.3 Overview on the Geographic Positions of the Plants ...... 88
4.4 Overview on Land Occupation and Plan Layout of the Plants .... 88
4.5 Overview of Projects and Equipment ...... 90
4.6 General Information of Raw and Auxiliary Materials ...... 107
4.7 Public Auxiliary Projects...... 109
4.8 The Production and Discharge of Main Pollutants ...... 115
4.9 Summary of Pollutant Discharge ...... 136
5 Comment on Pollution Prevention Measures ...... 139
5.1 Comment on Air Pollution Prevention Measures ...... 139
5.2 Comment on Water Pollution Prevention Measures ...... 153
5.3 Comment on Noise Pollution Prevention Measures ...... 160
5.4 Comment on Solid Waste Pollution Prevention Measures ...... 161
5.5 Underground Water and Soil Prevention Measures ...... 165
5.6 Greening Measures ...... 166
5.7 Summary List of “Three-meanwhile” Acceptance Check ...... 167
6 Industrial Policies, Cleaner Production and Recycling
Economy Analysis ...... 173
6.1 Industrial Policies ...... 173
6.2 Cleaner Production ...... 174
6.3 Recycling Economy ...... 190
7 Investigation on Regional Pollution Sources and Investigation
and Evaluation of Present Environmental Quality Condition . 192
7.1 Investigation on Regional Pollution Sources ...... 192 6 3 ΣPi(10 m /a) ...... 195
Ki(%) 195
7.2 Investigation on Present Environmental Quality Condition ...... 195
III Municipal Solid Waste Waste-to-Energy Project Phase III Expansion, Everbright Environmental Energy (Suzhou) Limited
7.3 Environmental Quality Review and Analysis ...... 211
8 Predicative Analysis on Environmental Impact ...... 215
8.1 Prediction and Evaluation on Ambient Air Impact ...... 215
8.2 Analysis on the Environmental Impact of Surface Water ...... 244
8.3 Prediction and Assessment of Noise Environmental Impact ...... 245
8.4 Analysis on the Environmental Impact of Solid Waste ...... 250
8.5 Analysis on the Environmental Impact of Soil ...... 251
8.6 Analysis on the Environmental Impact of Ground Water ...... 251 8.7 Analysis on the Environmental Impact during Waste
Transportation ...... 255
9 Analysis on Environmental Impact During Construction
Period ...... 256 9.1 Noise Environmental Impact Assessment and Control
Measures During Construction Period ...... 256 9.2 Waste Water Environmental Impact Assessment and Control
Measures During Construction Period ...... 259 9.3 Waste Gas Environmental Impact Assessment and Control
Measures During Construction Period ...... 259 9.4 Ecological Environmental Impact Assessment and Control
Measures during Construction Period ...... 261
10 Risk Assessment ...... 262
10.1 Overview ...... 262
10.2 Risk Identification ...... 262
10.3 Assessment Grade Determination and Assessment Range ...... 265
10.4 Analysis on Sources ...... 267
10.5 Analysis on Accident Consequences ...... 268
10.6 Risk Control Measures for Current Project ...... 274
10.7 Formulation of Accident Contingency Plan ...... 278
IV Municipal Solid Waste Waste-to-Energy Project Phase III Expansion, Everbright Environmental Energy (Suzhou) Limited 10.8 Contingency Prevention of the Expansion Project and Its
Contingency Plan ...... 283
10.9 Summary of Risk Assessment ...... 284
11 Emission Control ...... 285
11.1 Emission Control Factors ...... 285
11.2 Emission Application ...... 285
11.3 Emission Balance Plan ...... 286
12 Public Participation ...... 287
12.1 Purpose of Public Participation ...... 287
12.2 Principles of Public Participation...... 287
12.3 Methods of Public Participation ...... 288
12.4 Result Analysis of Public Participation Questionnaire Issued . 288
12.5 Online Publication Investigation ...... 298
12.6 Participating Hearing of the public ...... 298
12.7 Grievance Redress Mechanism...... 299
12.8 Investigation Conclusion of Public Participation ...... 300
13 Feasible Analysis of Site Selection ...... 302
13.1 Consistency Analysis to Urban Planning ...... 302 13.2 Consistency Analysis to Environmental Sanitation
Professional Planning ...... 303 13.3 Consistency Analysis on Important Environmental
Protection Targets ...... 304 13.4 Consistency of Environment Development [2008] No. 82
Regulation ...... 305
13.5 Environmental Impact Analysis ...... 310
13.6 Analysis on Reasonability of General Layout ...... 311
13.7 Summary ...... 312
14 Economic Cost-benefit Analysis ...... 314
V Municipal Solid Waste Waste-to-Energy Project Phase III Expansion, Everbright Environmental Energy (Suzhou) Limited
14.1 Economic Benefit Analysis ...... 314
14.2 Environmental Benefit Analysis ...... 315
14.3 Social and Economic Environmental Impact ...... 320
15 Environmental Management and Detection Plan ...... 321
15.1 Basic Objectives of Environmental Management ...... 321
15.2 Management Responsibilities and Measures ...... 321
15.3 Environmental Management Responsibilities ...... 321
15.4 Environmental Monitoring Responsibilities ...... 322
15.5 Environmental Supervision ...... 323
15.6 Environmental Monitoring Plan ...... 325
15.7 Standardization Requirements for Sewage Outfall ...... 329
16 Conclusion and Suggestions ...... 331
16.1 Project Overview ...... 331 16.2 Ambient Quality Situation and Main Environmental
Protection Objectives ...... 331
16.3 Main Pollution Prevention Measures ...... 334
16.4 Environmental Feasibility ...... 336
16.5 Analysis on Clean Production...... 338
16.6 Environmental Impact Forecast Results ...... 339
16.7 Emission Control...... 342
16.8 Public-participated Investigation ...... 342
16.9 Final Conclusions on Environmental Assessment ...... 343
16.10 Suggestions and Requirements ...... 343
VI Municipal Solid Waste Waste-to-Energy Project Phase III Expansion, Everbright Environmental Energy (Suzhou) Limited
1 Overview
1.1 Preface As a famous historic and cultural city as well as an important scenic tourist city, Suzhou is one of the cities with the fastest economic development in Yangtze River Delta. The city covers an area of 8,488 km2, with an urban area of 1,650 km2. At the end of 2009, its registered permanent residents were 6.3329 million, of which 2.4021 million lived in urban area. During the process of economic development, Suzhou put Qizishan Refuse Landfill Site into operation to disposal its municipal domestic waste in 1993, with the design storage capacity of 4.7 million cubic meters and the effective capacity of 4.2 million cubic meters, with the designed service life of 15 years. Since the rate of growth of domestic waste exceeds the expected value, the discharge quantity of Suzhou municipal domestic waste in 1993 was between 280~300t/d, which reached 1,300t/d in 2002 and 3,000t/d at the end of 2006, according to the statistics data of Suzhou Public Municipal Works Administration. Facing the restrictions of objective conditions, such as natural, social environment of Suzhou, selection and storage capacity of refuse landfill site, fast growth of domestic waste in urban area of Suzhou, it is urgent for Suzhou to choose proper approach of domestic waste disposal to solve the problem of sustainable development. From May of 2002 to December of 2003, relevant departments of Suzhou municipal government had declared and completed the environmental assessment of “3×350t/d Domestic Waste Waste-to-Energy Project of Suzhou SuNeng Waste-to-Energy Co., Ltd.” (hereinafter referred to as Phase Project), planning to use the reserved site of Qizishan Refuse Landfill Site to build a garbage incineration power plant with daily treatment of domestic waste of 1,000t. The project had its environmental impact assessment accomplished by State Power Environmental Protection Research Institute and had been replied by Jiangsu Environmental Protection Department in Suzhou Environment Management [2003] No. 229 in December, 2003. In 2004, China Everbright International Limited had been brought in by Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) pattern of government investment invitation and
1 Municipal Solid Waste Waste-to-Energy Project Phase III Expansion, Everbright Environmental Energy (Suzhou) Limited Everbright Environmental Protection Energy (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. was established to take charge of the establishment of Phase Project and the operation management of the first 25 year, and change the enterprise name according to Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Administration of Registration of Companies. In accordance with Suzhou Environment Acceptance (2007) No. 380, Phase Project had passed the acceptance of environmental protection organized by Jiangsu Environmental Protection Department. As domestic waste of Suzhou increases, Everbright Environmental Protection had invested RMB 450 million to implement the Phase extension project “2×500t/d garbage incinerator + 20MW turbo generator unit” (hereinafter referred to as Phase Project); meanwhile, in order to make full use of resources, the extension project would establish comprehensive utilization of slag project. The environmental impact assessment of the project had been accomplished by China Bluestar Lehigh Engineering Corporation. The project had been replied in Environment Audit [2008] No. 25 by the Ministry of Environmental Protection in March, 2008. Phase Project was constructed and put into operation in 2009 and past the acceptance of environmental protection organized by Ministry of Environmental Protection in Environment Acceptance [2010] No. 84. The data of online monitoring, acceptance monitoring, routine monitoring operated in Phase Project and Phase Project show that, through the purification of the process of “lime cream de-acidification by semi-dry process + activated carbon adsorption + bag dust separation”, the concentration of pollutants in the discharged gas of the flue gas is lower than the requirements of the standard selected in assessment (see 1.8.2 Standard of Pollutants Discharge), the discharge concentration of dioxins reaches the EU 2000 Standard (hereinafter referred to as EU Standard). Suzhou Qizishan Refuse Landfill Site and garbage incinerating power plant has become the only approach to dispose the domestic waste of Suzhou at present and in the future. In order to maximize the comprehensive utilization of resources, reduce environmental pollution, further promote the environmental bearing capacity of Suzhou, and realize the fast, sustainable and healthy development of Suzhou, Everbright Environmental Protection Energy (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. decides to invest RMB 750 million to establish Phase Extension Project, with the extension of “3×500t/d garbage incinerator + 2×15MW generator unit”, under the substantial support of local government department.
2 Municipal Solid Waste Waste-to-Energy Project Phase III Expansion, Everbright Environmental Energy (Suzhou) Limited In accordance with relevant regulations, such as Law of the Peoples Republic of China on Assessment of Environmental Effects and Environmental Protection Management Measures for Construction Project, Nanjing Institute of Environmental Science of the Ministry of Environmental Protection had accepted the delegation of Everbright Environmental Protection Energy (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. in March, 2011 to take charge of the environmental impact assessment of the Phase Extension Project of the Domestic Waste Waste-to-Energy project of the company, as well as the formulation of the environmental impact report of the project. After accepting the entrustment, the assessment unit had formulated the environmental impact assessment of the project and submitted it for approval, based on field investigation, collection of basic data and preliminary analysis of engineering pollution discharge condition.
1.2 Basis of Compilation
1.2.1 National Laws and Regulations 1 Environment Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China, December 26, 1989; 2 Law on the Prevention of Air Pollution of People's Republic of China, revised on April 29, 2000; 3 Law of the People's Republic of China on Prevention and Control of Water Pollution, June 1, 2008; 4 Law of the People's Republic of China on Prevention and Control of Pollution from Environmental Noise, revised on October 29, 1996; 5 Law of the People's Republic of China on the Prevention and Control of Environmental Pollution by Solid Wastes , revised on December 29, 2004 6 Law of the Peoples Republic of China on Assessment of Environmental Effects, September 1, 2003; 7 Energy Conservation Law of the People’s Republic of China, January 1, 1998; 8 Law of the People's Republic of China on Renewable Energy, January 1, 2006; 9 Cleaner Production Promotion Law of the People's Republic of China,
3 Municipal Solid Waste Waste-to-Energy Project Phase III Expansion, Everbright Environmental Energy (Suzhou) Limited January 1, 2003; 10 Decision of the State Council on Several Issues Concerning Environmental Protection, State Development No. (96) 31; 11 Regulations on the Administration of Construction Project Environmental Protection, the State Council Decree No. 253 in 1998; 12 Circular of Opinions on Enhancing Industrial Water Conservation, State Economic and Trade Resource (2000) Decree No. 1015 of State Economic and Trade Commission; 13 Decision on Implementing the Scientific Concept of Development and Stepping up Environmental Protection by the State Council, State Development [2005] No. 39; 14 “The Eleventh Five-Year Plan” National Environment Conservation Laws and Regulations Construction Plan, Environmental Development [2005] No. 131; 15 Instructional Advice of State Environment Protection Administration on Promoting Circular Economy, Environmental Development [2005] No. 114; 16 Classification Catalogue for Environment Impact Assessment of Construction Project, Ministry of Environmental Protection Decree No. 2, September 2, 2008; 17 Circular of Enhancing Environment Impact Assessment Management and Preventing Environmental Risk, State Environmental Protection Administration Environmental Development [2005] No. 152; 18 Circular of National Development and Reform Commission on the issuance of Relevant Management Rules on Renewable Energy Generation, National Development and Reform Commission Development and Reform Energy [2006] No. 13; 19 The Notice about Speeding up Electric Power Industry Adjustment and Help it Develop Healthily and Orderly, National Development and Reform Commission Development and Reform Energy [2006] No. 661; 20 Interim Provisions for Environment Impact Assessment Public Participation, State Environmental Protection Administration Environmental Development [2006] No. 28; 21 Circular of State Environmental Protection Administration on Work for
4 Municipal Solid Waste Waste-to-Energy Project Phase III Expansion, Everbright Environmental Energy (Suzhou) Limited Reporting the Total Emission of Major Pollutants, Environmental Development [2006] No. 98; 22 Circular of State Environmental Protection Administration, State Economic and Trade Commission, Ministry of Science and Technology on Hazardous Waste Disposal Policy, Environmental Development [2001] No. 199; 23 Technological Policy for Treatment of Municipal Solid Wastes and Its Pollution Prevention, Ministry of Construction, Ministry of Science and Technology, State Environmental Protection Administration, Jian Cheng [2000] No. 120; 24 National Dangerous Wastes Catalogue, Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China, National Development and Reform Commission of the People’s Republic of China Decree No. 1, June 6, 2008; 25 Measures for Administration of Hazardous Waste Manifest, State Environmental Protection Administration, October 1, 1999; 26 Provisions for Documents of Classification and Approval on Environment Impact Assessment of Construction Project, Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China Decree No. 5, January 16, 2009; 27 Rules on Further Strengthening Industrial Policy and Credit Policy to Coordinate and Control Credit Risks, National Development and Reform Commission Development and Reform Industry [2004] No. 46; 28 Guideline Catalogue for Industrial Restructuring (2011 version); 29 Circular of State Environmental Protection Administration on the Issuance of Guidelines on Total Amount Distribution of Sulfur Dioxide (Environmental Development [2006] No. 182); 30 Official Reply of the State Council on the Control Plan of the Total Emission of National Main Pollutants During the “Eleventh Five-Year Plan”, and its Annex Control Plan of the Total Emission of National Main Pollutants During the “Eleventh Five-Year Plan”, the State Council Guo Han [2006] No. 70; 31 Circular on Further Strengthening Environment Impact Assessment Management of Biomass Waste-to-Energy Projects, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Development and Reform Commission, Bureau of Energy, Environmental Development [2008] No. 82, September 4, 2008; 32 Town Appearance Sanitation Regulations, the State Council Decree No.
5 Municipal Solid Waste Waste-to-Energy Project Phase III Expansion, Everbright Environmental Energy (Suzhou) Limited 101, June, 1992; 33 Administrative Measures for Urban Living Garbage, Ministry of Construction Decree No. 27, August, 1993; 34 State Planning Commission, Ministry of Construction, State Environmental Protection Administration, Ji Investment [2002] No. 1591, Circular on Boosting the Industrialization Development of Urban Sewage and Garbage; 35 National Development and Reform Committee, etc. Development and Reform Huan Zi [2004] No. 73, Circular on the Issuance of List of Resources for Comprehensive Use (2003 Revision); 36 Control over Licensing for the Discharge of Key Pollutants in Huai River and Taihu Lake Basin (Trial Implementation), State Environmental Protection Administration, October 1, 2001; 37 General Office of the State Council Transmitted the Circular of Ministry of Environmental Protection on the Guideline of Promoting Air Pollution Joint Prevention and Control and Improving Regional Air Quality (State Office Transmit [2010] No. 33).
1.2.2 Local Policy, Laws and Regulations (1) Environmental Air Quality Functional Regionalization of Jiangsu Province; (2) Classification of Surface Water Function Category of Jiangsu Province; (3) Jiangsu Environmental Protection Act, implemented on August 16, 1997; (4) Interim Provisions on the Control of Total Amount of Discharged Pollutants of Jiangsu Province (1993 Provincial Government Decree No. 38); (5) Several Stipulations Concerning Sewage Outlet Setting and Standardized Management (Jiangsu Environment Control [1997] No. 122); (6) Circular of Doing Good Job in the Environmental Management of Construction Project (Jiangsu Environment Management [2006] No. 98); (7) Guidance Catalogue for Industrial Structure Adjustment of Jiangsu Province (Jiangsu Government Issue [2006] No. 140); (8) Policies and Measures of Jiangsu Province on Promoting Environmental Protection (Jiangsu Government Issue [2006] No. 92), July, 2006; (9) Jiangsu Province Noise Pollution Control Regulations, The Standing Committee of the Tenth People's Congress of Jiangsu Province, No. 108,
6 Municipal Solid Waste Waste-to-Energy Project Phase III Expansion, Everbright Environmental Energy (Suzhou) Limited implemented on March 1, 2006; (10) Circular of Provincial Government on Policies and Measures Concerning Promoting the Construction of Conservation-minded Society, Jiangsu Government Issue [2006] No. 60, May 4, 2006; (11) Circular of Provincial Government on Opinions Concerning the Implementation of Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction of Jiangsu Province, Jiangsu Government Issue [2007] No. 63; (12) Circular of the Issuance of the Standard of Formulating the Content of Recycle Economy in Regional Development and Environmental Impact Assessment of Construction Project (Trial Implementation), Jiangsu Environmental Protection Department, February, 2004 (Jiangsu Environment Control [2005] No. 50); (13) Circular of Provincial Government on Implementation Plan of Water Environmental Comprehensive Control in Taihu Lake Basin of Jiangsu Province, (Jiangsu Government Issue [2009] No. 36); (14) Circular of Provincial Government Office on the Issuance of Jiangsu “the Eleventh Five-Year Plan” Document of Responsibility on Reducing Total Amount of Water Pollutants (Jiangsu Government Issue [2007] No. 97); (15) Taihu Lake Water Pollution Prevention and Control Regulations of Jiangsu Province, revised in 2007; (16) Guidance Catalogue for Suzhou Industrial Development, Jiangsu Government [2007] No. 129; (17) Circular of Municipal Government Office Transmitted the Working Points of Water Pollution Prevention and Control Taihu Lake Basin of Suzhou in 2010,Jiangsu Government Office [2010] No. 112; (18) Circular of Issuing the Implementation Opinions on Further Strengthening the Implementation of Emission Reduction of Main Pollutants, Jiangsu Government [2007] No. 148; (19) Circular of Issuing the Review Management Measures of Regional Balance Plan of the Total Discharge Amount of Main Pollutants of Construction Project in Jiangsu Province, (Jiangsu Environment Office [2011] No. 71); (20) Circular of Further Normalizing Public Participation and Hearing System in Environmental Assessment of Planning and Construction, (Jiangsu Environment Office [2011] No. 173); (21) Solid Waste Pollution Control Regulations of Jiangsu Province (2010).
7 Municipal Solid Waste Waste-to-Energy Project Phase III Expansion, Everbright Environmental Energy (Suzhou) Limited
1.2.3 Local Plans and Data of the Project Site (1) Suzhou Urban Master Plan (2007-2020); (2) Eleventh Five-Year Planning on Environmental Protection of Suzhou; (3) Professional Plan of Suzhou on Environmental Hygiene (2006-2020); (4) Master Plan of Mudu Town in Wu County; (5) Environmental Protection Plan of Mudu Town in Wu County.
1.2.4 Technical Basis (1) Technical Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment-General Principles (HJ/T2.1-93); (2) Technical Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment- Atmospheric Environment (HJ2.2-2008); (3) Technical Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment- Surface Water Environment (HJ/T2.3-93); (4) Technical Guidelines for Noise Assessment (HJ2.4-2009); (5) Technical Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment- Groundwater Environment (HJ610-2011); (6) Technical Guidelines for Environmental Risk Assessment on Projects (HJ/T169-2004); (7) Provisions of Jiangsu Province on Standardization Formulation of Main Content of Environmental Impact Report of Construction Projects (Trial Implementation); (8) Industrial Standard of People's Republic of China Technical Code for Projects of Municipal Household Garbage Incineration (CJJ90-2009), Ministry of Construction, September 1, 2002; (9) Industrial Standard for Environment Protection of People's Republic of China Specification for Formulating Environmental Impact Statement of Thermal Power Plant Construction Project (HJ/T13-1996, issued by State Environmental Protection Administration, Ministry of Power Industry); (10) Standard for Pollution Control on the Household Garbage Incineration (GB18485-2001); (11) Standard for Pollution Control on the Landfill Site of Household Garbage
8 Municipal Solid Waste Waste-to-Energy Project Phase III Expansion, Everbright Environmental Energy (Suzhou) Limited (GB16889-2008); (12) Standard for Pollution Control on Hazardous Waste Storage (GB18597-2001).
1.2.5 Documents and Replies Relating to the Project (1) Power of Attorney for Environmental Assessment; (2) Circular of Provincial Development and Reform Committee on Implementing Preliminary Work of Phase Extension Project of Suzhou Domestic Waste Waste-to-Energy Project, Su Development and Reform Investment Fa [2011] No. 240; (3) Advisory opinions on environmental Assessment of construction project, Advisory [2011] No. 40; (4) Application Report of the Project.
1.3 Assessment Purposes and Working Principles
1.3.1 Assessment Purposes It is required to analyze the impact degree and range on surrounding environment according to the main pollutants discharged by the project, argue the environmental feasibility of engineering construction and advancement and rationality of environment protection safety measures on technology and economy, and further put forward measures and suggestions for preventing, controlling and reducing pollution, so as to provide basis for the design of environment protection facilities and environmental management.
1.3.2 Working Principles 1. According to the “3R Principle” of reduction, reuse and recycle, it is required to realize the recycle of resources across industries, promote resource utilization, comprehensively utilize waste, safety disposal, aiming for promoting the coordination of society, economy and ecology environment. 2. It is required to stick on the principle of “cleaner production”, “standard discharge” and “control on the total amount of pollutants” according to the rules of Regulations on the Administration of Construction Project Environmental Protection, and strengthen the assessment content of cleaner production technology and
9 Municipal Solid Waste Waste-to-Energy Project Phase III Expansion, Everbright Environmental Energy (Suzhou) Limited environmental protection control countermeasures. 3. It is required to conscientiously implement national regulations and policies, analyze and assess the planning consistency of the project, rationality of engineering and pollution prevention and control, feasibility of site selection. 4. It is also required to do engineering analysis well, analyze the impact degree and range of the project on environment through environmental impact forecasting by combining the environmental characteristics of the geographical position of the proposed project, put forward feasible environmental protection measures, minimize the discharge amount of pollutants, and work out real and reliable assessment conclusion, so as to provide basis for environmental protection control and environmental management.
1.4 Assessment Factors See Table 1.4-1 for the assessment factors of the project.
Table 1.4-1 Environmental Assessment Factors Current Condition Assessment Factors Impacted Assessment Total Amount Item Factors (Analysis) Control Factors
Dust, SO2, NO2, HCl, SO2, NO2, PM10, NH3, H2S, HCl, HCl, HF, PM10, SO2, NOx, CO, Atmosphere HF, CO, Cd, Pb, Hg, fluoride, CO, Pb, Cd, dioxin Cd, Pb, Hg, dioxins, NH3, H2S dioxins Surface pH, COD, DO, ammonia nitrogen, - - Water SS, total phosphorus, oil type pH, permanganate index, ammonia nitrogen, Cr6+, Cd, Hg, Pb, total Groundwater - - escherichia coli, nitrite nitrogen, fluoride, total hardness
Noise Equivalent sound level Ld(A) - pH, cadmium, mercury, arsenic,
Soil copper, lead, chromium, zinc, nickel, - - dioxin
Ecology Plant, farmland ecology - Discharge amount of Solid Wastes Output, utilization amount, disposal amount of industrial solid wastes industrial solid wastes
10 Municipal Solid Waste Waste-to-Energy Project Phase III Expansion, Everbright Environmental Energy (Suzhou) Limited 1.5 Assessment Grade
1.5.1 Assessment Grade of Environment and Air According to the analysis results of preliminary engineering, the main
atmosphere pollutants of the project include NOx, SO2, HCl, etc. In accordance with the requirements of Technical Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment- Atmospheric Environment (HJ2.2-2008), it is required to choose estimation pattern to classify the atmospheric environment assessment of the project, individually calculate
the standard rate of maximum ground level concentration Pi for all pollutants, the
longest distance D10% corresponding to that when ground level concentration reaches 10% of standard limit value, see Table 1.5-1 for the calculation results of main pollutants. The results are calculated according to the estimation pattern. Pmax, fly ash
solidification in-organization, is 20.16%; the biggest D10% appears at 803.66m. According to assessment grading criteria (Table 1.5-2), the assessment grade of this project is Level . It is stipulated in Technical Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment- Atmospheric Environment (HJ2.2-2008) that “it shall be not less than Level for the special items with its discharged pollutant having serious hazard to human health or ecological environment”. Therefore, the atmosphere assessment grade of this project is defined as Level . To assess the impacts of the project on Mudu Town, the assessment range takes the range with the center of project exhaust funnel and the radius of 3 km.
Table 1.5-1 Calculation Result Sheet of Estimation Pattern Maximum Appearance Standard Rate Concentration Distance of Assessment of Maximum Recommended Pollution Pollutant of Downwind Maximum Standard Ground D10% [m] Assessment Source Direction Concentration [ug/m3] Concentration Grade [ug/m3] [m] [%]
Dust 1.43 1,000.0 450.00 .32
SO2 1.43 1,000.0 500.00 .29
NO2 23.11 1,005.0 240.00 9.63 Incinerator HCl 0.73 1,005.0 50.00 1.46 HF 0.14 1,000.0 20.00 .70 Pb 0.07 1,005.0 10.70 .66 Hg 0.01 1,005.0 .90 .78
11 Municipal Solid Waste Waste-to-Energy Project Phase III Expansion, Everbright Environmental Energy (Suzhou) Limited
Cd 0.01 1,005.0 10.00 .07 Dioxin 0.00 1,000.0 .00 .29 Ammonia Refuse Chute 5.24 123.0 200.00 2.62 H2S 0.61 123.0 10.00 6.07 Fly Ash pm10 90.73 96.0 450.00 20.16 803.66 Solidification
Table 1.5-2 Assessment Grade Assessment Grade Criterion of Assessment Grade Level Pmax ≥ 80%, and D10% ≥ 5km Level Others
Pmax < 10%, or D10% < the closest distance of pollution source Level from boundary of factory
1.5.2 Surface Water Environment Assessment Grade With respect to industrial waste water recycling, only the pipe of domestic sewage is connected to new sewage treatment plant. According to the relevant provisions of Technical Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment (Surface Water) (HJ/T2.3-93), the water assessment grade is brief analysis.
1.5.3 Noise Assessment Grade The quality standard for noise of the region where the project is located implements the Level standard of Environmental Quality Standard for Noise (GB3096-2008). Through forecasting, the added value of the noise at the boundary of the factory is less than 3dB (A), thus the quality standard for noise of the project is defined as Level , according to the requirements of Technical Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment (HJ2.4-2009).
1.5.4 Groundwater Environment Assessment Grade The construction project belongs to I project that may cause pollution to groundwater. According to Technical Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment HJ610-2011, it is required to make sure the assessment and range of groundwater by selecting aeration zone antifouling property, vulnerable water-bearing bed, sensitivity of groundwater environment, sewage quantity and complexity of
12 Municipal Solid Waste Waste-to-Energy Project Phase III Expansion, Everbright Environmental Energy (Suzhou) Limited sewage quality. In accordance with Table 6 and Table 12 of Technical Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment HJ610-2011, the groundwater environmental impact grade of this project is Level and the assessment range is the round area with the project as the center and the radius of 6km. The assessment indicator and assessment standard of all items are showed in the following tables:
Table 1.5-3 Aeration Zone Antifouling Property Grade Grade Penetrability of aeration zone rock (soil) The thickness of single rock (soil) bed of Mb ≥ 1.0m, coefficient of permeability of k Strong 10-7cm/s, continuous and stable distribution The thickness of single rock (soil) bed of 0.5m Mb 1.0m, coefficient of permeability of k 10-7cm/s, continuous and stable distribution Middle The thickness of single rock (soil) bed of Mb≥1.0m, coefficient of permeability of 10-7cm/s k 10-4cm/s, continuous and stable distribution Weak Rock and soil bed fail to meet the conditions of the above “strong” or “middle” Note: The “rock (soil) bed” refers to the first rock (soil) bed under the underground base of the construction project; the coefficient of permeability of aeration zone rock (soil) bed refers to the coefficient of permeability of aeration zone rock soil when it is saturated.
Table 1.5-4 Grade of Vulnerable Water-bearing Bed of Construction Project Grade Position of the project site and vulnerable water-bearing bed property The area with strong coefficient of permeability of unconfined aquifer and aeration zone rock property (for instance, sand and gravel); area that has close relationship with Easy groundwater and surface water; area that goes against dilution and self-purification of pollutant in groundwater Area with multiple water-bearing bed system and close relationship of water power Middle between beds Difficult Other areas beyond the above situation
Table 1.5-5 Sensitivity of Groundwater Environment Grade Groundwater environment property of the project site Quasi conservation area of centralized model drinking water source field (including the Sensitive built water source field under operation, for backup or emergence, as well as water source
13 Municipal Solid Waste Waste-to-Energy Project Phase III Expansion, Everbright Environmental Energy (Suzhou) Limited field under construction and planning); other conservation areas relating to groundwater set by national or local government beyond centralized model drinking water source field, like special groundwater resource conservation area such as hot water, mineral water and warm spring Supply runoff area beyond quasi conservation area of centralized model drinking water source field (including the built water source field under operation, for backup or More emergence, as well as water source field under construction and planning); distribution Sensitive area beyond special groundwater resource (for instance, mineral water, warm spring, etc.) conservation area, as well as the environmental sensitivity areas that are not listed in the above sensitivity grade Insensitive Other areas beyond the above areas Note: 1. The “environmental sensitivity area” in the table refers to the environmental sensitivity area relating to groundwater defined in Classification Catalogue for Environment Impact Assessment of Construction Project. 2. in case the water-bearing bed (water-bearing system) is located at the boundary of supply area or runoff area and discharge area; the sensitivity grade shall be upgrade by one level.
Table 1.5-6 Sewage Quantity Grand Grade Total Amount of Sewage Discharge (m3/d)
Large 10,000 Middle 1,000~10,000 Small 1,000